Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T04:35:43.666Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Recipients designed: Tag questions and gender

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Alexa Hepburn
Affiliation:
Loughborough University
Jonathan Potter
Affiliation:
Loughborough University
Susan A. Speer
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
Elizabeth Stokoe
Affiliation:
Loughborough University
Get access

Summary

Introduction: Lakoff, psychology and tag questions

One of the most emblematic claims of early feminist work on language was that there are systematic differences between men and women in their use of tag questions. Famously, and as part of her path-breaking work in the study of gender inequalities, Lakoff (1975) suggested that there is a ‘linguistic rule’ that women will use tag questions more than men. This entails that:

Women's speech sounds more polite than men's. One aspect of politeness is as we have just described: leaving a decision open, not imposing your mind, or views or claims on anyone else.

(Lakoff, 1975: 18)

Equally famously, subsequent researchers raised doubts about the empirical basis of the claim that tag questions are characteristic of women's talk and the idea that tag questions have a single and standard conversational role (e.g., Cameron et al., 1988; Coates, 2004; Eckert & McConnell-Ginet, 2003; Holmes, 1995; Speer, 2005a).

This chapter will bracket off the wide-ranging arguments about whether tags do or do not mark a gender difference, or whether the grammatical pattern underlies some psychological state such as a lack of confidence or assertiveness. Nevertheless, to help us engage with the sociolinguistic literature we will work with a selection of tag questions produced by female speakers addressing male recipients. These will be taken from a varied set of contexts: a child protection helpline, mundane talk and a television programme where house buyers are helped in their search. Our broader aim, however, will be quite discrete.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×