Book contents
- Cracking the Digital Ceiling
- Cracking the Digital Ceiling
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Global Perspectives
- Part II Regional Perspectives
- Part III Cultural Perspectives from the United States and Europe
- Part IV Cultural Perspectives from Asia-Pacific
- Conclusion
- Notes
- Index
- References
Conclusion
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 October 2019
Book contents
- Cracking the Digital Ceiling
- Cracking the Digital Ceiling
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Global Perspectives
- Part II Regional Perspectives
- Part III Cultural Perspectives from the United States and Europe
- Part IV Cultural Perspectives from Asia-Pacific
- Conclusion
- Notes
- Index
- References
Summary
As we close this collection of many perspectives from multiple cultures and countries we hope to have shown that women’s participation in computing is largely determined by cultural factors. We hope this book has provided a convincing argument that alternative ways of thinking about, and acting on, gender and computing issues could benefit both the field and the people in it. We have argued for the examination of variables outside a gender dichotomy as possible sources of differences in women’s participation in computing. In particular, we have suggested and illustrated that a cultural approach, an approach that pays close attention to culture and environment, focuses on the many factors that can allow for, or hinder, women’s participation.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Cracking the Digital CeilingWomen in Computing around the World, pp. 324 - 336Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Abu-Lail, N., Phang, F., Ater Kranov, A., Mohd-Yusof, K., Olsen, R. G., Williams, R., and Zainal Abidin, A. (2012). Persistent Gender Inequity in U.S. Undergraduate Engineering: Looking to Jordan and Malaysia for Factors to Their Success in Achieving Gender Parity. In Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference, 1–34.Google Scholar
Adams, J., Vimala, B., and Baichoo, S. (2003). An Expanding Pipeline: Gender in Mauritius. In Proceedings of the 34th ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 59–63.Google Scholar
Alghamdi, F. (2016). Women in Computing in Saudi Arabia. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM-W Europe Celebration of Women in Computing. Retrieved from https://uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:971716/FULLTEXT01.pdf.Google Scholar
Azoulay, A., and Mlambo-Ngcuka, P. (2018). Joint-Message from Audrey Azoulay, Director-General of UNESCO, and Ms Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka, Executive Director of UN Women, on the Occasion of the International Day for Women and Girls in Science. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), February 11. Retrieved from https://en.unesco.org/commemorations/womenandgirlinscienceday.Google Scholar
Bian, L., Leslie, S., and Cimpian, A. (2017). Gender Stereotypes about Intellectual Ability Emerge Early and Influence Children’s Interests. Science, 355, 389–391.Google Scholar
Charles, M., and Bradley, K. (2006). A Matter of Degrees: Female Underrepresentation in Computer Science Programs Cross-Nationally. In Cohoon, J. M. and Aspray, W. (eds.), Women and Information Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 183–203.Google Scholar
Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Davies, P. G., and Steele, C. M. (2009). Ambient Belonging: How Stereotypical Cues Impact Gender Participation in Computer Science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1045–1060.Google Scholar
Devine, P. G., Forscher, P. S., Austin, A. J., and Cox, W. T. (2013). Long-Term Reduction in Implicit Race Bias: A Prejudice Habit-Breaking Intervention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(6), 1267–1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diekman, A. B, Eagly, A. H., Mlandinic, A., and Ferreira, M. C. (2005). Dynamic Stereotypes about Women and Men in Latin America and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36(2), 209–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eliot, L. (2009). Pink Brain, Blue Brain: How Small Differences Grow into Troublesome Gaps – And What We Can Do about It. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
Ferrante, M. B. (2018). Three Ways to Ask for a Flexible Work Schedule. Forbes, October 20. Retrieved from www.forbes.com/sites/marybethferrante/2018/10/20/3-ways-to-ask-for-a-flexible-work-schedule/1#656c5e391246.Google Scholar
Fine, C. (2010). Delusions of Gender: How Our Minds, Society, and Neurosexism Create Differences. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Guy, S. (2018). Flexible Work Arrangements: A Growing Trend for Engineers. SWE Magazine, May 7. Retrieved from https://alltogether.swe.org/2018/05/flexible-work-arrangements-a-growing-trend-for-engineers/.Google Scholar
Jordon-Young, R. M. (2011). Brain Storm: The Flaws in the Science of Sex Differences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mastroianni, A., and McCoy, D. (2018). Countries with Less Gender Equity Have More Women in STEM – Huh? Scientific American, Voices, May 17. Retrieved from https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/voices/countries-with-less-gender-equity-have-more-women-in-stem-huh/.Google Scholar
Pal, J. (2010). Of Mouse and Men: Computers and Geeks as Cinematic Icons in the Age of ICTD. In Proceedings of the 2010 iConference, 179–187.Google Scholar
Quesenberry, J. L., and Trauth, E. M. (2008). Revisiting Career Path Assumptions: The Case of Women in the IT Workforce? International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Paris, Paper 150.Google Scholar
Reges, S. (2018). Why Women Don’t Code. Quillette, June 19. Retreived from https://quillette.com/2018/06/19/why-women-dont-code/.Google Scholar
Sanchez, A., and Singh, A. (2016). Accessing Higher Education in Developing Countries: Panel Data Analysis from India, Peru, and Vietnam. Young Lives, Working Paper 150, May. Retrieved from https://europa.eu/capacity4dev/file/31987/download?token=ztUbIV7A.Google Scholar
Schnall, M. (2014). Celebrating Gloria Steinem’s 80th Birthday. Huffpost, May 24. Retrieved from www.huffingtonpost.com/marianne-schnall/gloria-steinems-80th-birthday_b_5009045.html.Google Scholar
Thébaud, S., and Charles, M. (2018). Segregation, Stereotypes, and STEM. Social Sciences, 7(7), 111.Google Scholar
World Economic Forum (2016). The Global Gender Gap Report 2017. Retrieved from www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-gender-gap-report-2017.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.