Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T11:31:10.751Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Understanding organizations through embodied metaphors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2011

Loizos Heracleous
Affiliation:
University of Warwick
Claus D. Jacobs
Affiliation:
Universität St Gallen, Switzerland
Get access

Summary

In Chapter 2 we outlined the key theoretical antecedents to crafting strategy through embodied metaphors, drawing from literature on metaphor and embodied realism. We portrayed metaphor as a creative force, addressing the cognitive, spatial and embodied dimensions. We also addressed the theoretical development of metaphor in the context of organization development interventions, a context we exemplify in this chapter. We operationalize the embodied metaphor approach in a study of three organization development workshops where groups of actors were engaged in constructing metaphors in the flesh: physical entities whose target domains were their task, their organization in its business landscape, and the identity of their division. In doing so, participants drew on a variety of source domains, and the resulting metaphors produced insights for them in terms of developing shared views of their target domains, as well as for us as researchers through a three-stage analytical process involving contextual understanding, within-case analysis and cross-case analysis.

We analyzed grand metaphors and constituent metaphors constructed by these teams, and found that actors' first-order perceptions of organizational dimensions such as power, importance, relatedness, coherence, belongingness, robustness/duality of relationships, and uniformity, are manifested in particular ways in these embodied metaphors, through the spatial arrangement of physical objects. We found that analysis of embodied metaphors can enable access to actors' first-order conceptions of organizational dimensions, revealing alternative qualities and interrelations among them, and posing substantial challenges to established conceptions of ontology and method in organization theory.

Type
Chapter
Information
Crafting Strategy
Embodied Metaphors in Practice
, pp. 121 - 155
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Association, American Psychological. 1994. Publication manual of the American Psychological Association, 4th edn. Washington, DC: APA.
Barrett, F. J. and Cooperrider, D. L. 1990. Generative metaphor intervention: A new behavioral approach for working with systems divided by conflict and caught in defensive perception. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 26: 219–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, D. 1994. Making the invisible visible: Using analogically-based methods to surface unconscious organizational processes. Organization Development Journal, 12(4): 37–47.Google Scholar
Broussine, M. and Vince, R. 1996. Working with metaphor towards organizational change. In Oswick, C. and Grant, D. (eds.), Organisation development: Metaphorical explorations. London: Pitman, 57–70.Google Scholar
Buergi, P. and Roos, J. 2003. Images of strategy. European Management Journal, 21(1): 69–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buergi, P., Jacobs, C., and Roos, J. 2005. From metaphor to practice in the crafting of strategy. Journal of Management Inquiry, 14: 78–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, W. W. 1992. Metaphors to consult by. Group and Organization Management, 17: 255–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dilthey, W. 1989. Introduction to the human sciences. Makkreel, R. A. and Rodi, F. (eds.), Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Doyle, J. R., and Sims, D. 2002. Enabling strategic metaphor in conversation: A technique of cognitive sculpting for explicating knowledge. In Huff, A. S. and Jenkins, M. (eds.), Mapping strategic knowledge. London: Sage, 63–85.Google Scholar
Donaldson, L. 1996. For positivist organization theory. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forceville, C. 2009. Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In Forceville, C. and Urios-Aparisi, E. (eds.), Multimodal metaphor. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 19–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. 1999. Researching metaphor. In Cameron, L. and Low, G. (eds.), Researching and applying metaphor. Cambridge University Press, 28–47.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. 2003. Embodied experience and linguistic meaning. Brain and Language, 84, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heath, C. and Hindmarsh, J. 2002. Analysing interaction: Video, ethnography and situated conduct. In May, T. (ed.), Qualitative Research in Action. London: Sage, 99–121.Google Scholar
Heracleous, L. and Jacobs, C. 2008. Understanding organizations through embodied metaphors. Organization Studies, 29: 45–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J. 1984. Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Huff, A. S. 1990. Mapping strategic thought. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Jacobs, C. and Heracleous, L. 2006. Constructing shared understanding – the role of embodied metaphors in organization development. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 24(2): 207–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. 1987. The body in the mind: the bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. and Lakoff, G. 2002. Why cognitive linguistics requires embodied realism. Cognitive Linguistics, 13: 245–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M.. 1999. Philosophy in the flesh. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Marshak, R. 1993. Managing the metaphors of change. Organizational Dynamics, 22(1): 44–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, M. B. and Huberman, A. M. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Morgan, G. 1980. Paradigms, metaphor and puzzle solving in organization theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25: 660–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, G. 1983. More on metaphor: Why we cannot control tropes in administrative science. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28: 601–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, G. 1986. Images of organization. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Oswick, C., Putnam, L., and Keenoy, T. 2004. Tropes, discourse and organizing. In Grant, D., Hardy, C., Oswick, C., and Putnam, L. (eds.), Sage handbook of organizational discourse. London: Sage, 105–27.Google Scholar
Palmer, I. and Dunford, R. 1996. Conflicting uses of metaphors: Reconceptualizing their use in the field of organizational change. Academy of Management Review, 21: 691–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeffer, J. 1993. Barriers to the advance of organization science: Paradigm development as a dependent variable. Academy of Management Review, 18: 599–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rakova, M. 2002. The philosophy of embodied realism: A high price to pay?Cognitive Linguistics, 13: 215–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roos, J., Victor, B., and Statler, M. 2004. Playing seriously with strategy. Long Range Planning, 37: 549–68.
Rohre, T. 2007. The body in space: Embodiment, experientialism and linguistic conceptualization. In Ziemke, T., Zlatev, J., and Frank, R. (eds.), Body, Language and Mind, Vol. 1. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Stake, R. E. 1995. The art of case research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Weber, M. 1991. The nature of social action. In Runciman, W. G. (ed.), Weber: Selections in translation. Cambridge University Press, 7–32.Google Scholar
Yin, R. 1994. Case study research: Design and methods, 2nd edn. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×