Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-c75p9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-01T05:39:02.439Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Creative Thinking and Reasoning: Can You Have One Without the Other?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2010

By
Daniel Fasko
Edited by
James C. Kaufman  and
John Baer
Daniel Fasko
Affiliation:
Division of Educational Foundations & Inquiry, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio
James C. Kaufman
Affiliation:
California State University, San Bernardino
John Baer
Affiliation:
Rider University, New Jersey
Get access

Summary

There have been numerous demands in U.S. education for enhanced creative thinking and reasoning skills in our students. Unfortunately, there appears to be a dearth of research regarding the relationship between creative thinking and reasoning. Interestingly, Marzano (1998) reported that Goal 3 of The National Educational Goals Report: Building a Nation of Learners (National Education Goals Panel, 1991) addressed the improvement of thinking and reasoning skills. It is suggested, though, that creative thinking and reasoning are essential skills for student achievement and, ultimately, success in school. The purpose of this chapter, then, is to examine the relationship between creative thinking and reasoning. The chapter begins with a discussion of reasoning. This is followed by a discussion of creativity/creative thinking. Next is a discussion of research related to creative thinking and reasoning. Last, the chapter concludes with a discussion of the implications to research and practice.

REASONING

There are many definitions of reasoning. For the purpose of this chapter, reasoning is defined as “ … a deliberating process of working things out to solve problems …” (Calne, 1999, p. 18). As Calne noted, it may be perceived as a tool. However, he felt that reason does not have the ability to motivate because it has no affective component, which is required for one to attain any “mental rewards” (p. 27).

Interestingly, it was Inhelder and Piaget (1958) who first stipulated that there was an invariant sequence of stages of cognitive development that influenced mental/intellectual reasoning.

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Creativity and Reason in Cognitive Development , pp. 159 - 176
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Amabile, T. M. (1979). Effects of external evaluation on artistic creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 221–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 997–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1985). Motivation and creativity: Effects of motivational orientation in creative writers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 393–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1993). Motivated synergy: Toward new conceptualizations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace. Human Resource Management Review, 3, 185–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to “The Social Psychology of Creativity.”Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M., & Gitomer, J. (1984). Children's artistic creativity: Effects of choice in task materials. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 209–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amabile, T. M., Hennessey, B. A., & Grossman, B. S. (1986). Social influences on creativity: The effects of contracted-for reward. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 14–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A., & Tighe, E. M. (1994). The work preference inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 950–967.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ansburg, P. I., & Hill, K. (2003). Creative and analytic thinkers differ in their use of attentional resources. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 1141–1152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Army Research Institute. (2003). Guidelines for leaders to consider when making decisions. Retrieved July 18, 2003, from http://www.ari.army.mil/Outreach/leader_3a.htm.
Baer, J. (1988). Long-term effects of creativity training with middle school students. Journal of Early Adolescence, 8, 183–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baer, J. (1993). Creativity and divergent thinking: A task-specific approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Baer, J. (1997). Creative teachers, creative students. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Basadur, M. S., Graen, G. B., & Green, S. C. (1982). Training in creative problem solving: Effects on ideation and problem finding and solving in an I/O research organization. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 30, 41–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basadur, M. S., Graen, G. B., & Scandura, T. A. (1986). Training effects on attitudes toward divergent thinking among manufacturing engineers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 612–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borkowski, J. G. (1985). Signs of intelligence: Strategy generalization and metacognition. In Yussen, S. (Ed.), The growth and reflection in children (pp. 105–144). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bullock, M., Nunner-Winkler, G., Stern, E., Lopez, A. R., & Ziegler, A. (2003). Using a complex rule in different domains: When familiar schemes don't help. In Fasko, D. (Ed.), Critical thinking and reasoning: Current research, theory, and practice (pp. 121–142). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Calne, D. B. (1999). Within reason: Rationality and human behavior. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Cameron, J., & Pierce, W. D. (1994). Reinforcement, reward, and intrinsic motivation: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 64, 363–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cattell, R. B. (1971). Abilities: Their structure, growth and action. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Church, M. A., Elliot, A. J., & Gable, S. L. (2001). Perceptions of classroom environment, achievement goals, and achievement outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, M. A., & Amabile, T. M. (1999). Motivation and creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 297–312). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Corno, L. (1989). Self-regulated learning: A volitional analysis. In Zimmerman, B. J. & Schunk, D. H. (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 111–141). New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, G. A., Houtman, S. E., Warren, T. F., Roweton, W. E., Mari, S., & Belcher, T. L. (1972). A program for training creative thinking: Inner city evaluation (Report No. 224). Madison: Wisconsin Research and Development Center for Cognitive Learning. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED070809).Google Scholar
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groot, A. D. (1965). Thought and choice in chess. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Eisenberger, R., & Cameron, J. (1996). Detrimental effects of reward: Reality or myth? American Psychologist, 51, 1153–1166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eisenberger, R., & Selbst, M. (1994). Does reward increase or decrease creativity? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 1116–1127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1994). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire: Comprising the EPQ-Revised (EPQ-R) and EPQ-R Short Scale. San Diego, CA: EDITS.Google Scholar
Fasko, D. (2001). Education and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 317–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feist, G. J. (1991). Synthetic and analytic thought: Similarities and differences among art and science students. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 145–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fontenot, N. A. (1993). Effects of training in creativity and creativity problem finding on business people. Journal of Social Psychology, 133, 11–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds: An anatomy of creativity seen through the lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham, and Gandhi. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Garson, J. (2004). Intro Mind Notes, Week 10: Reasoning and Creativity. Retrieved September 9, 2004, from http://www.hfac.uh.edu/phil/garson/IMNotes10.htm.
Green, B. A., & Miller, R. B. (1996). Influences on achievement: Goals, perceived ability, and cognitive engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 181–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halpern, D. F. (2003). Thinking critically about creative thinking. In Runco, M. A. (Ed.), Critical creative processes (pp. 189–207). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Hare, W. (2003). The ideal of open-mindedness and its place in education. Journal of Thought, 38(2), 3–10.Google Scholar
Hastie, R., & Dawes, R. M. (2001). Rational choice in an uncertain world: The psychology of judgment and decision making. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hitt, W. D. (1965). Toward a two-factor theory of creativity. The Psychological Record, 15, 127–132.Google Scholar
Horn, J. L. (1985). Remodeling old models of intelligence. In Wolman, B. B. (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence, theories, measurements, and applications (pp. 267–400). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Hunt, E. (1995). The role of intelligence in modern society. American Scientist, 83, 356–375.Google Scholar
Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. New York: Basic Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, A. P. (2000). Up and out: Using creative and critical thinking skills to enhance learning. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Kay, S. (1994). A method for investigating the creative thought process. In Runco, M. A. (Ed.), Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity (pp. 116–129). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Lepper, M. R., Greene, D., & Nisbett, R. E. (1973). Undermining children's intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the “overjustification” hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 129–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loewen, A. C. (1995). Creative problem solving. Teaching Children Mathematics, 2(2), 96–99.Google Scholar
Lomask, M. S., & Baron, J. B. (2003). What can performance-based assessment tell us about students' reasoning? In Fasko, D. (Ed.), Critical thinking and reasoning: Current research, theory, and practice (pp. 331–354). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Markovits, H. (2003). The development of thinking: Commentary. In Fasko, D. (Ed.), Critical thinking and reasoning: Current research, theory, and practice (pp. 165–184). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Martindale, C. (1995). Creativity and connectionism. In Smith, S. M., Ward, T. B., & Finke, R. A. (Eds.), The creative cognition approach (pp. 249–268). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Marzano, R. J. (1998). What are the general skills of thinking and reasoning and how do you teach them? The Clearing House, 71(5), 268–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meadow, A., & Parnes, S. J. (1959). Evaluation of training in creative problem solving. Journal of Applied Psychology, 43, 189–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendelsohn, G. A., & Griswold, B. B. (1966). Assessed creative potential, vocabulary level, and sex as predictors of the use of incidental cures in verbal problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 423–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mumford, M. D., Baughman, W. A., & Sager, C. E. (2003). Picking the right material: Cognitive processing skills and their role in creative thought. In Runco, M. A. (Ed.), Critical creative processes (pp. 19–68). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Mumford, M. D., Connelly, M. S., Baughman, W. A., & Marks, M. A. (1994). Creativity and problem solving: Cognition, adaptability, and wisdom. Roeper Review, 16, 241–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Education Goals Panel. (1991). The National Education Goals Report: Building a nation of learners. Washington, DC: Author.
Nickerson, R. S. (1999). Enhancing creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 392–430). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Noller, R. B., & Parnes, S. J. (1972). Applied creativity: The creative studies project: The curriculum. Journal of Creative Behavior, 6, 275–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noller, R. B., Parnes, S. J., & Biondi, A. M. (1976). Creative action book. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (1994). Another look at eliminative and enumerative behaviour in a conceptual task. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 6, 149–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parnes, S. J. (1972). Creativity: Unlocking human potential. Buffalo, NY: D. O. K.Google Scholar
Parnes, S. J., & Noller, R. B. (1972). Applied creativity: The creative studies project: Part results of the two year program. Journal of Creative Behavior, 6, 164–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parnes, S. J., & Noller, R. B. (1973). Toward supersanity. Buffalo, NY: D. O. K.Google Scholar
Pasupathi, M., Staudinger, U. M., & Baltes, P. B. (2001). Seeds of wisdom: Adolescents' knowledge and judgment about difficult life problems. Developmental Psychology, 37, 351–361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paul, R. W. (1993). The logic of creative and critical thinking. American Behavioral Scientist, 37, 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reese, H. W., Parnes, S. J., & Treffinger, D. J. (1976). Effects of a creative studies program on structure of intellect factors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 401–410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Runco, M. A. (1987). The generality of creative performance in gifted and nongifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31, 121–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runco, M. A., & Chand, I. (1995). Cognition and creativity. Educational Psychology Review, 7, 243–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruscio, J., Whitney, D. M., & Amabile, T. M. (1998). Looking inside the fishbowl of creativity: Verbal and behavioral predictors of creative performance. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 243–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3 & 4), 207–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, G. A. (1992). Hyperactivity and creativity: The tacit dimension. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30, 157–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shermer, M. (2003). How to be open-minded without your brains falling out. Journal of Thought, 38(2), 33–48.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2000). Creativity: Cognitive, developmental, personal, and social aspects. American Psychologist, 55, 151–158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, S. M., & Blankenship, S. E. (1991). Incubation and the persistence of fixation in problem solving. American Journal of Psychology, 104, 61–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1998). Individual differences in rational thought. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 161–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staudinger, U. M., Lopez, D. F., & Baltes, P. B. (1997). The psychometric location of wisdom-related performance: Intelligence, personality, and more? Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 23, 1200–1214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1998). A balance theory of wisdom. Review of General Psychology, 2, 347–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2001). What is the common thread of creativity? Its dialectical relation to intelligence and wisdom. American Psychologist, 56, 360–362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Wisdom, intelligence, and creativity synthesized. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & O'Hara, L. A. (1999). Creativity and intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 251–271). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thorndike, E., & Lorge, I. (1944). The teacher's wordbook of 30,000 words. New York: Teacher's College Bureau of Publications.Google Scholar
Treffinger, D. J. (1980). Encouraging creative learning for the gifted and talented. Ventura, CA: Ventura County Schools/LTI.Google Scholar
Treffinger, D. J. (1986). Research on creativity. Gifted Child Quarterly, 30 (1), 15–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treffinger, D. J. (1995). Creative problem solving: Overview and educational implications. Educational Psychology Review, 7, 191–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treffinger, D. J., Isaksen, S. G., & Firestein, R. L. (1983). Theoretical perspectives on creative learning and its facilitation: An overview. Journal of Creative Behavior, 17, 9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vartanian, O., Martindale, C., & Kwiatkowski, J. (2003). Creativity and inductive reasoning: The relationship between divergent thinking and performance on Wason's 2-4-6 task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A, 641–655.Google Scholar
Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children: A study of the creativity-intelligence distinction. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 129–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yekovich, F. R. (1994). Current issues in research on intelligence. ERIC/AE Digest, 1–4. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation. (ED 385605)Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×