Skip to main content
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 1199
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Gilbert, Jane 2019. Educational Research in the Age of Anthropocene. p. 259.

    Mislan, David Bell and Streich, Philip 2019. Weird IR. p. 1.

    Marttila, Tomas 2019. Discourse, Culture and Organization. p. 17.

    Doorenspleet, Renske 2019. Rethinking the Value of Democracy. p. 69.

    Pearce, Jacob 2018. Psychometrics in action, science as practice. Advances in Health Sciences Education, Vol. 23, Issue. 3, p. 653.

    Dimitrakos, Thodoris 2018. Scientific Mind and Objective World: Thomas Kuhn Between Naturalism and Apriorism. Erkenntnis,

    Schmid, Michael 2018. Der „Neue Institutionalismus“. p. 79.

    Roll-Hansen, Nils 2018. Revisiting the Pouchet–Pasteur controversy over spontaneous generation: understanding experimental method. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, Vol. 40, Issue. 4,

    van Rossenberg, Yvonne Gerarda Theodora Klein, Howard J. Asplund, Kajsa Bentein, Kathleen Breitsohl, Heiko Cohen, Aaron Cross, David de Aguiar Rodrigues, Ana Carolina Duflot, Veronique Kilroy, Steven Ali, Nima Rapti, Andriana Ruhle, Sascha Solinger, Omar Swart, Juani and Yalabik, Zeynep Y. 2018. The future of workplace commitment: key questions and directions. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 27, Issue. 2, p. 153.

    Niaz, Mansoor 2018. Evolving Nature of Objectivity in the History of Science and its Implications for Science Education. Vol. 46, Issue. , p. 37.

    Fumagalli, Roberto 2018. Who is afraid of scientific imperialism?. Synthese, Vol. 195, Issue. 9, p. 4125.

    Zwaan, Rolf A. Etz, Alexander Lucas, Richard E. and Donnellan, M. Brent 2018. Improving social and behavioral science by making replication mainstream: A response to commentaries. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 41, Issue. ,

    Dobson, Stephen 2018. Learning Cities. Vol. 8, Issue. , p. 111.

    Ricks, Jacob I. and Liu, Amy H. 2018. Process-Tracing Research Designs: A Practical Guide. PS: Political Science & Politics, Vol. 51, Issue. 4, p. 842.

    Woodley of Menie, Michael A. and Sarraf, Matthew A. 2018. Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. p. 1.

    Knowles, Jonathan 2018. Rortian Realism. Metaphilosophy, Vol. 49, Issue. 1-2, p. 90.

    Dawes, Gregory W. 2018. Identifying Pseudoscience: A Social Process Criterion. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, Vol. 49, Issue. 3, p. 283.

    Hodgson, Geoffrey M. and Lamberg, Juha-Antti 2018. The past and future of evolutionary economics: some reflections based on new bibliometric evidence. Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Vol. 15, Issue. 1, p. 167.

    McCoy, C. D. and Massimi, Michela 2018. Simplified models: a different perspective on models as mediators. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, Vol. 8, Issue. 1, p. 99.

    LeBel, Etienne P. McCarthy, Randy J. Earp, Brian D. Elson, Malte and Vanpaemel, Wolf 2018. A Unified Framework to Quantify the Credibility of Scientific Findings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, Vol. 1, Issue. 3, p. 389.

  • Print publication year: 1970
  • Online publication date: August 2014

Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge
  • Online ISBN: 9781139171434
  • Book DOI:
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
Agassi, [1959]: ‘How are Facts Discovered?’, Impulse, 3, No. 10, pp. 2–4.
Agassi, [1962]: ‘The Confusion between Physics and Metaphysics in the Standard Histories of Sciences’, in the Proceedings of the Tenth International Congress of the History of Science, 1964, 1, pp. 231–8.
Agassi, [1964]: ‘Scientific Problems and Their Roots in Metaphysics’, in Bunge, (ed.): The Critical Approach to Science and Philosophy, 1964, pp. 189–211.
Agassi, [1966]: ‘Sensationalism’, Mind, N.S. 75, pp. 1–24.
Agassi, [1968]: ‘The Novelty of Popper's Philosophy of Science’, International Philosophical Quarterly, 8, pp. 442–63.
Agassi, [1969]: ‘Popper on Learning from Experience’, in Rescher, (ed.): Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 1969.
Ayer, [1936]: Language, Truth and Logic, 1936; second edition 1946.
Bartley, [1968]: ‘Theories of Demarcation between Science and Metaphysics’, in Lakatos, and Musgrave, (eds): Problems in the Philosophy of Science, 1968, pp. 40–64.
Becke, and Sitte, [1933]: ‘Zur Theorie des β-Zerfalls’, Zeitschrift fur Physik, 86, pp. 105–19.
Bemal, [1965]: Science in History, third edition, 1965.
Bernstein, [1961]: A Comprehensible World: On Modern Science and its Origins, 1961.
Bethe, and Peierls, [1934]: “The “Neutrino””, Nature, 133, p. 532.
Bohr, [1913a]: ‘On the Constitution of Atoms and Molecules’, Philosophical Magazine, 26, pp. 1–25, 476-S02 and 857-75.
Bohr, [19136]: Letter to Rutherford, 6.3.1913; published in Bohr [1963], pp. xxxviii–ix.
Bohr, [1913c]: ‘The Spectra of Helium and Hydrogen’, nature, 92, pp. 231–2.
Bohr, [1922]: “The Structure of the Atom”, Nobel Lecture.
Bohr, [1926]: Letter to Nature, 117, p. 264.
Bohr, [1930]: ‘Chemistry and the Quantum Theory of Atomic Constitution’, Faraday Lecture 1930, Journal of the Chemical Society, 1932/1, pp. 349–84.
Bohr, [1933]: ‘Light and Life’, nature, 131, pp. 421–3 and 457-9.
Bohr, [1936]: ‘Conservation Laws in Quantum Theory’, Nature, 138, pp. 25–6.
Bohr, [1949]: ‘Discussion with Einstein on Epistemological Problems in Atomic Physics’, in Schilpp, (ed.): Albert Einstein, Philosopher-Scientist, 1949, 1, pp. 201–41.
Bohr, [1963]: On the Constitution of Atoms and Molecules, 1963.
Born, [1948]: ‘Max Karl Ernst Ludwig Planck’, Obituary Notices of Fellows of the Royal Society, 6, 161–80.
Born, [1954]: “The Statistical Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics”, Nobel Lecture 1954.
Braithwaite, [1938]: ‘The Relevance of Psychology to Logic’, Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volumes, 17, pp. 19–41.
Braithwaite, [1953]: Scientific Explanation, 1953.
Callendar, [1914]: ‘The Pressure of Radiation and Carnot's Principle,’ Nature, 92, p. 553.
Canfield, and Lehrer, [1961]: ‘A Note on Prediction and Deduction’, Philosophy of Science, 1961, 28, pp. 204–8.
Carnap, [19321933]: ‘Über Protokollsätze’, Erkenntnis, 3, pp. 215–28.
Carnap, [1935]: Review of Popper's [1934], Erkenntnis, 5, pp. 290–4.
Coffa, [1968]: ‘Deductive Predictions’, Philosophy of Science, 35, pp. 279–83.
Crookes, [1886]: Presidential Address to the Chemistry Section of the British Association, Report of British Association, 1886, pp. 558–76.
Crookes, [1888]: Report at the Annual General Meeting, Journal of the Chemical Society, S3, pp. 487-504.
Davisson, [1937]: ‘The Discovery of Electron Waves’, Nobel Lecture, 1937.
Dirac, [1936]: ‘Does Conservation of Energy Hold in Atomic Processes?’, nature, 137, pp. 298–9.
Dirac, [1951]: ‘Is there an Aether?’, nature, 168, pp. 906–7.
Dorling, [1968]: ‘Length Contraction and Clock Synchronisation: The Empirical Equivalence of the Einsteinian and Lorentzian Theories’, The British Journalfor the Philosophy of Science, 19, pp. 67–9.
Dreyer, [1906]: History of the Planetary Systems from Thales to Kepler, 1906.
Duhem, [1906]: La Theorie Physique, Son Objet et Sa Structure, 1905. English translation of the second (1914) edition: The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, 1954.
Eccles, [1964]: ‘The Neurophysiological Basis of Experience’, in Bunge, (ed.): The Critical Approach to Science and Philosophy, 1964.
Ehrenfest, [1911]: ‘Welche Züge der Lichtquantenhypothese spielen in der Theorie der Wärmestrahlung eine wesentliche Rolle?’, Annahm der Physik, 36, pp. 91–118.
Ehrenfest, [1913]: ‘Zur Krise der Lichtäther-Hypothese’, 1913.
Einstein, [1909]: ‘Über die Entwicklung unserer Anschauungen über das Wesen und die Konstitution der Strahlung’, Physikalische Zeitschrift, 10, pp. 817–26.
Einstein, [1927]: ‘Neue Experimente über den Einfluss der Erdbewegung auf die Lichtgeschwindigkeit relativ zur Erde’, Forschungen und Fortschritte, 3, p. 36.
Einstein, [1928]: Letter to Schrödinger, 31.5.1928; published in K., Przibram (ed.): Briefe Zur Wellenmechanik, 1963.
Einstein, [1931]: ‘Gedenkworte auf Albert A. Michelson’, Zeitschrift für angewandte Chemie, 44, p. 658.
Einstein, [1949]: ‘Autobiographical Notes’, in Schilpp, (ed.): Albert Einstein, Philosopher-Scientist, I, pp 2-95.
Ellis, and Mott, [1933] : ‘Energy Relations in the β-Ray Type of Radioactive Disintegration’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A, 96, pp. 502–11.
Ellis, and Wooster, [1927] : ‘The Average Energy of Disintegration of Radium E’, Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series A, 117, pp. 109–23.
Evans, [1913] : ‘The Spectra of Helium and Hydrogen’, nature, 92, p. 5.
Fermi, [1933] : ‘Tentativo di una teoria dell emissione dei raggi “beta”’, Ricerci Scientifica, 4(a), pp. 491–5.
Fermi, [1934] : ‘Versuch einer Theorie der β-Strahlen. I’, Zeitschrift für Physik, 88, pp. 161–77.
Feyerabend, [1959]: ‘Comments on Grünbaum's “Law and Convention in Physical Theory”’, in Feigland, Maxwell (eds): Current Issues in the Philosophy of Science, 1961, pp. 155–61.
Feyerabend, [1965] : ‘Reply to Criticism’, in Cohen, and Wartofsky, (eds) : Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, II, pp. 223–61.
Feyerabend, [19681969]: ‘On a Recent Critique of Complementarity’, Philosophy of Science, 35, pp. 309–31 and 36, pp. 82–105.
Feyerabend, [1969] : ‘Problems of Empiricism II’, in Colodny, (ed.): The nature and Function of Scientific Theory, 1969.
Feyerabend, [1970]: ‘Against Method’, Minnesota Studies for the Philosophy of Science, 4, 1970.
Fowler, [1912]: ‘Observations of the Principal and Other Series of lines in the Spectrum of Hydrogen’, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 73, pp. 62–71.
Fowler, [1913a] : ‘The Spectra of Helium and Hydrogen’, nature, 92, p. 95.
Fowler, [19136]: ‘The Spectra of Helium and Hydrogen’, nature, 92, p. 232.
Fowler, [1914] : ‘Series Lines in Spark Spectra’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (A), 90, pp. 426–30.
Fresnel, [1818]: ‘Lettre à François Arago sur l'Influence du Mouvement Terrestre dans quelques Phénomènes Optiques’, Annales de Chimie et de Physique, 9, pp. 57 ff.
Galileo, [1632]: Dialogo dei Massimi Sistemi, 1632.
Gamow, [1966]: Thirty Years that Shook Physics, 1966.
Grünbaum, [1959a] : ‘The Falsifiability of the Lorentz-Fitzgerald Contraction Hypothesis’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 10, pp. 48–50.
Grünbaum, [1959b]: ‘Law and Convention in Physical Theory’, in Feigl, and Maxwell, (eds): Current Issues in the Philosophy of Science, 1961, pp. 40–155.
Grünbaum, [1960]: ‘The Duhemian Argument’, Philosophy of Science, 11, pp. 75–87.
Grünbaum, [1966]: ‘The Falsifiability of a Component of a Theoretical System’, in Feyerabend, and Maxwell, (eds.): Mind, Matter and Method: Essays in Philosophy and Science in Honor of Herbert Feigl, 1966, pp. 273–305.
Grünbaum, [1969]: ‘Can We Ascertain the Falsity of a Scientific Hypothesis?’, Studium Generale, 22, pp. 1061–93.
Heisenberg, [1955]: ‘The Development of the Interpretation of Quantum Theory’, in Pauli, (ed.): Niels Bohr and the Development of Physics, 1955.
Hempel, [1937]: Review of Popper's [1934], Deutsche Literaturzeitung, 1937, pp. 309–14.
Hempel, [1952]: ‘Some Theses on Empirical Certainty’, The Review of Metaphysics, 5, pp. 620–1.
Henderson, [1934]: ‘The Upper Limits of the Continuous β-rzy Spectra of Thorium C and C11’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A, 147, pp 572–82.
Hesse, [1968]: Review of Grünbaum [1966], The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 18, pp. 333–5.
Hevesy, [1913]: ‘Letter to Rutherford, 14.10.1913’, quoted in Bohr [1963], p. XLII.
Hund, [1961]: ‘Göttingen, Copenhagen, Leipzig im Rückblick’, in Bopp, (ed.): Werner Heisenberg und die Physik unserer Zeit, Braunschweig 1961.
Jaffe, [1960] : Michelson and the Speed of Light, 1960.
Jammer, [1966]: The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics, 1966.
Joffé, [1911]: ‘Zur Theorie der Strahlungserscheinungen’, Annalen der Physik, 36, pp. 534–52.
Juhos, [1966]: ‘Über die empirische Induktion’, Studium Generale, 19, pp. 259–72.
Keynes, [1921]: A Treatise on Probability, 1921.
Koestler, [1959]: The Sleepwalkers, 1959.
Konopinski, and Uhlenbeck, [1935]: ‘On the Fermi theory of β-radioactivity’, Physical Review, 48, pp. 7–12.
Koyré, [1965]: Newtonian Studies, 1965.
Kramers, [1923] : ‘Das Korrespondenzprinzip und der Schalenbau des Atoms’, Die naturwissenschaften, 11, pp. 550–9.
Kudar, [19291930]: ‘Der wellenmechanische Charakter des β-Zerfalls, I–II–III’, Zeitschrift für Physik, 57, pp. 257–60, 60, pp. 168–75 and 176–83.
Kuhn, [1962]: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 1962.
Kuhn, [1965]: ‘Logic of Discovery or Psychology of Research’, this volume, pp. 1–23.
Lakatos, [1962]: ‘Infinite Regress and the Foundations of Mathematics’, Aristoelian Society Supplementary Volume, 36, pp. 155–84.
Lakatos, [19631964]: ‘Proofs and Refutations’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 14, pp. 1–25, 120–39, 221–43, 296–342.
Lakatos, [1968a]: ‘Changes in the Problem of Inductive Logic’, in Lakatos, (ed.): The Problem of Inductive Logic, 1968, pp. 315–417.
Lakatos, [19686]: ‘Criticism and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes’, in Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 69, pp. 149–86.
Lakatos, [1971a]: ‘Popper zum Abgrenzungs- und Induktionsproblem’, in H., Lenk (ed.): Neue Aspekte der Wissenschaftstheorie, 1971. The English version appeared in 1974.
Lakatos, [19716]: ‘History of Science and its Rational Reconstructions’, in R. C., Buck and R. S., Cohen (eds.): PSA 1970, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 8, pp. 91–135.
Lakatos, [1971c]: ‘Replies to Critics’, in R. C., Buck and R. S., Cohen (eds.): PSA 1970, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. 8, pp. 174–82.
Laplace, [1796]: Exposition du Système du Monde, 1796.
Larmor, [1904]: ‘On the Ascertained Absence of Effects of Motion through the Aether, in Relation to the Constitution of Matter, and on the Fitzgerald-Lorentz Hypothesis’, Philosophical Magazine, Series 6, 7, pp. 621–5.
Laudan, [1965]: ‘Griinbaum on “The Duhemian Argument”’, Philosophy of Science, 32, pp. 295–9.
Lorentz, [1886]: De l'Influence du Mouvement de la Terre sur les Phénomènes Lumineux', Versl. Kon. Akad. Wetensch. Amsterdam, 2, pp. 297-358. Reprinted in Lorentz: Collected Papers, 4, 1937, pp. 153–218.
Lorentz, [1892a]: ‘The Relative Motion of the Earth and the Ether’, Versl. Kon. Akad. Wetensch. Amsterdam, I, pp. 74–7. Reprinted in Lorentz: Collected Papers, 4, 1937, pp. 219–23.
Leibnitz, [1678]: Letter to Conring, 19.3.1678.
Le Roy, [1899]: ‘Science et Philosophie’, Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale, 7, pp. 375–425, 503–62, 706–31.
Le Roy, [1901]: ‘Un Positivisme Nouveau’, Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale, 9, pp. 138–53.
Lorentz, [18926]: ‘Stokes' Theory of Aberration’, Versl. Kon. Akad. Wetensch. Amsterdam, I, pp. 97-103. Reprinted in Lorentz: Collected Papers, 4, 1937, pp. 224–31.
Lorentz, [1895]: Versucheiner Theorie der electrischen und optischen Erscheinungen in bewegten Körpern, 1895, § 89-92.
Lorentz, [1897]: ‘Concerning the Problem of the Dragging Along of the Ether by the Earth’, Versl. Kon. Akad. Wetensch. Amsterdam, 6, pp. 266–72. Reprinted in Lorentz: Collected Papers, 4, 1937, pp. 237–44.
Lorentz, [1923]: “The Rotation of the Earth and its Influence on Optical Phenomena”, Nature, 112, pp. 103–4.
Lykken, [1968]: ‘Statistical Significance in Psychological Research’, Psychological Bulletin, 70, pp. 151–9.
McCulloch, [1825]: The Principles of Political Economy: With a Sketch of the Rise and Progress of the Science, 1825.
MacLaurin, [1748]: Account of Sir Isaac Newton's Philosophical Discoveries, 1748.
Margenau, [1950]: The nature of Physical Reality, 1950.
Marignac, [1860]: ‘Commentary on Stas' Researches on the Mutual Relations of Atomic Weights’, reprinted in Prout's Hypothesis, Alembic Club Reprints, 20, pp. 48–58.
Maxwell, [1871]: Theory of Heat, 1871.
Medawar, [1967]: The Art of the Soluble, 1967.
Medawar, [1969]: Induction and Intuition in Scientific Thought, 1969.
Meehl, [1967]: ‘Theory Testing in Psychology and Physics: a Methodological Paradox’, Philosophy of Science, 34, pp. 103–115.
Meitner, [1933]: ‘Kernstruktur’, in Geiger-Scheel, (eds.): Handbuch der Physik, Zweite Auflage, 22/1, pp. 118–52.
Meitner, and Orthmann, [1930]: ‘Uber eine absolute Bestimmung der Energie der primären β-Strahlen von Radium E’, Zeitschrift für Physik, 60, pp. 143–55.
Michelson, [1881]: ‘The Relative Motion of the Earth and the Luminiferous Ether’, American Journal of Science, Ser. 3, 22, pp. 120–9.
Michelson, [1891-2]: ‘On the Application of Interference Methods to Spectroscopic Measurements, I-II’, Philosophical Magazine, Ser. 3, 31, pp. 338-46, and 34, pp. 280–99.
Michelson, [1897]: ‘On the Relative Motion of the Earth and the Ether’, American Jourtuil of Science, Ser. 4, 3, pp. 475–8.
Michelson, and Gale, [1925]: ‘The Effect of the Earth's Rotation on the Velocity of Light’, Astrophysical Journal, 61, pp. 137–45.
Michelson, and Morley, [1887]: ‘On the Relative Motion of the Earth and the Luminiferous Ether’, American Journal of Science, Ser. 5, 34, pp. 333–45.
Milhaud, [1896]: ‘La Science Rationnelle’, Revue de Mitaphysique et de Morale, 4, pp. 280–302.
Mill, [1843]: A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive, Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence, and the Methods of Scientific Investigation, 1843.
Miller, [1925]: ‘Ether-Drift Experiments at Mount Wilson’, Science, 41, pp. 617–21.
Morley, and Miller, [1904]: Letter to Kelvin, published in Philosophical Magazine, Ser. 6, 8, pp. 753–4.
Moseley, [1914]: ‘Letter to nature’, nature, 92, p. 554.
Mott, [1933]: “Wellenmechanik und Kernphysik”, in Geiger, and Scheel, (eds.): Handbuch der Physik, Zweite Auflage, 24/1, pp. 785–841.
Musgrave, [1968]: ‘On a Demarcation Dispute’, in Lakatos, and Musgrave, (eds.): Problems in the Philosophy of Science, 1968, pp. 78–88.
Musgrave, [1969a]: Impersonal Knowledge, Ph.D. Thesis, University of London, 1969.
Musgrave, [19696]: Review of Ziman's ‘Public Knowledge: An Essay Concerning the Social Dimensions of Science’, in The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 20, pp. 92–4.
Musgrave, [1974]: “The Objectivism of Popper's Epistemology”, in Schilpp, (ed.): The Philosophy of Sir Karl Popper.
Nagel, [1961]: The Structure of Science, 1961.
Nagel, [1967]: ‘What is True and False in Science: Medawar ana the Anatomy of Research’, Encounter, 29, No. 3, pp. 68–70.
Nature, [19131914]: ‘Physics at the British Association’, Nature, 92, pp. 305–9.
Neurath, [1935]: ‘Pseudorationalismus der Falsifikation’, Erkenntnis, 5, pp. 353–65.
Nicholson, [1913]: ‘A Possible Extension of the Spectrum of Hydrogen’, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 73, pp. 382–5.
Pauli, [1958]: ‘Zur älteren und neueren Geschichte des Neutrinos’, published in Pauli, , Aufsätze und Vortrage über Physik und Erkenntnistheorie, 1961, pp. 156–80.
Pearce, Williams [1968]: Relativity Theory: Its Origins and Impact on Modern Thought, 1968.
Peierls, [1936]: ‘Interpretation of Shankland's Experiment’, Nature, 137, p. 904.
Planck, (1900a]: ‘Über eine Verbesserung der Wienschen Spektralgleichung’, Verhandlungen der Deutschen Physikalischen Gesellschaft, 2, pp. 202–4; English translation in Ter Haar [1967].
Planck, [19006]: ‘Zur Theorie des Gesetzes der Energieverteilung im Normalspektrum’, Verhandlungen der Deutschen Physikalischen Gesellschaft, 2, pp. 237–45; English translation in Ter Haar [1967].
Planck, [1929]: ‘Zwanzig Jahre Arbeit am Physikalischen Weltbild’, Physica, 9, pp. 193–222.
Planck, [1947]: Scientific Autobiography, published posthumously in German in 1948, in English translation in 1950.
Poincaré, [1891]: ‘Les géométries non euclidiennes’, Revue Générale des Sciences Pures et Appliquées, 2, pp. 769–74.
Poincaré, [1902]: La Science et l'Hypothèse, 1902.
Polanyi, [1958]: Personal Knowledge, Towards a Post-critical Philosophy, 1958.
Popkin, [1968]: ‘Scepticism, Theology and the Scientific Revolution in the Seventeenth Century’, in Lakatos, and Musgrave, (eds.): Problems in the Philosophy of Science, 1968, pp. 1–28.
Popper, [1933]: ‘Ein Kriterium des empirischen Charakters theoretischer Systeme’, Erkenntnis, 3, pp. 426–7.
Popper, [1934]: Logik der Forschung, 1935 (expanded English edition: Popper [1959a]).
Popper, [1935]: ‘Induktionslogik und Hypothesenwahrscheinlichkeit’, Erkenntnis, 5, pp. 170–2; published in English in his [1959a], pp. 315–17.
Popper, [1940]: ‘What is Dialectic?’, Mind, N.S. 49, pp. 403–26; reprinted in Popper [1963], pp. 312-35.
Popper, [1945]: The Open Society and its Enemies, I-II, 1945.
Popper, [1957a]: ‘The Aim of Science’, Ratio, 1, pp. 24–35.
Popper, [19576]: The Poverty of Historicism, 1957.
Popper, [1958]: ‘Philosophy and Physics’; published in Atti del XII Congresso Internazionale di Filosofia, Vol. 2, 1960, pp. 363–74.
Popper, [1959a]: The Logic of Scientific Discovery, 1959.
Popper, [19596]: ‘Testability and “ad-Hocness” of the Contraction Hypothesis’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 10, p. 50.
Popper, [1963]: Conjectures and Refutations, 1963.
Popper, [1965]: ‘Normal Science and ite Dangers’, this volume, pp. 51–8.
Popper, [1967]: ‘Quantum Mechanics without “The Observer”’ in M., Bunge (ed.): Quantum Theory and Reality, 1967.
Popper, [1968a]: ‘Epistemologa without a Knowing Subject’, in Rootselaar, and Staal, (eds.): Proceedings of the Third International Congress for Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Amsterdam, 1968, pp. 333–73.
Popper, (1968b]: ‘On the Theory of the Objective Mind’, in Proceedings of the XIV International Congress of Philosophy, 1, 1968, pp. 25–53.
Popper, [1968c]: ‘Remarks on the Problems of Demarcation and Rationality’, in Lakatos, and Musgrave, (eds.): Problems in the Philosophy of Science, 1968, pp. 88–102.
Popper, [1969]: ‘A Realist View of Logic, Physics and History’, in Yourgrau, and Breck, (eds.): Physics, Logic and History, 1969.
Power, [1964]: Introductory Quantum Electrodynamics, 1964.
Prokhovnik, [1967]: The Logic of Special Relativity, 1967.
Prout, [1815]: ‘On the Relation between the Specific Gravities of Bodies in their Gaseous State and the Weights of their Atoms’, Annals of Philosophy, 6, pp. 321–30; reprinted in Prout's Hypothesis, Alembic Club Reprints, 20, 1932.
Quine, [1953]: From a Logical Point of View, 1953.
Rabi, [1961]: ‘Atomic Structure’, in G. M., Murphy and M. H., Shamos (eds.): Recent Advances in Science, 1956.
Reichenbach, [1951]: The Rise of Scientific Philosophy, 1951.
Runge, [1925]: ‘Äther und Relativitätstheorie’, Die naturwissenschaften, 13, p. 440.
Russell, [1914]: The Philosophy of Bergson, 1914.
Russell, [1943]: ‘Reply to Critics’, in Schlipp, (ed.): The Philosophy of Bertrand Russell, 1943. pp. 681-741.
Russell, [1946]: History of Western Philosophy, 1946.
Rutherford, , Chadwick, and Ellis, [1930]: Radiations from Radioactive Substances, 1930.
Schlick, [1934]: ‘Über das Fundament der Erkenntnis’, Erkenntnis, 4, pp. 79-99; published in English in Ayer (ed.): Logical Positivism, 1959, pp. 209–27.
Schrödinger, [1958]: ‘Might perhaps Energy be merely a Statistical Concept?’, Il Nouvo Cimento, 9, pp. 162–70.
Shankland, [1936]: ‘An Apparent Failure of the Photon Theory of Scattering’, Physical Review, 49, pp. 8–13.
Shankland, [1964]: ‘Michelson-Morley Experiment’, American Journal of Physics, 32, pp. 16–35.
Soddy, [1932]: The Interpretation of the Atom, 1932.
Sommerfeld, [1916]: ‘Zur Quantentheorie der Spektrallinien’, Annalen der Physik, 51, pp. 1–94 and 125–67.
Stebbing, [1914]: Pragmatism and French Voluntarism, 1914.
Stegmüller, [1966]: ‘Explanation, Prediction, Scientific Systematization and Non-Explanatory Information’, Ratio, 8, pp. 1–24.
Stokes, [1845]: ‘On the Aberration of Light’, Philosophical Magazine, Third Series, 27, pp. 9–15.
Stokes, [1846]: ‘On Fresnel's Theory of the Aberration of Light’, Philosophical Magazine, Third Series, 28, pp. 76–81.
Synge, [19521954]: ‘Effects of Acceleration in the Michelson-Morley Experiment’, The Scientific Proceedings of the Royal Dublin Society, New Series, 26, pp. 45-54.
Ter, Haar [1067]: The Old Quantum Theory, 1967.
Thomson, [1929]: ‘On the Waves associated with β-rays, and the Relation between Free Electrons and their Waves’, Philosophical Magazine, Seventh Series, 7, pp. 405–17.
Toulmin, [1967]: ‘The Evolutionary Development of natural Science’, American Scientist, 55. pp. 456–71.
Treiman, [1959]: ‘The Weak Interactions’, Scientific American, 200, pp. 72–84.
Truesdell, [1960]: ‘The Program toward Rediscovering the Rational Mechanics in the Age of Reason’, Archive of the History of Exact Sciences, 1, pp. 3–36.
Uhlenbeck, and Goudsmit, [1925]: ‘Ersetzung der Hypothese vom unmechanischen Zwang durch eine Forderung bezüglich des inneren Verhaltens jedes einzelnen Electrons’, Die naturwissenschaften, 13, pp. 953–4.
Van Der, Waerden [1967]: Sources of Quantum Mechanics, 1967.
Watkins, [1957]: ‘Between Analytic and Empirical’, Philosophy, 32, pp. 112–31.
Watkins, [1958]: ‘Influential and Confirmable Metaphysics’, Mind, N.S. 67, pp. 344–65.
Watkins, [1960]: ‘When are Statements Empirical?’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 10, pp. 287–308.
Watkins, [1968]: ‘Hume, Carnap and Popper’, in Lakatos, (ed.): The Problem of Inductive Logic, 1968, pp. 271–82.
Whewell, [1837]: History of the Inductive Sciences, from the Earliest to the Present Time. Three volumes, 1837.
Whewell, [1840]: Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences, Founded upon their History. Two volumes, 1840.
Whewell, [1851]: ‘On the Transformation of Hypotheses in the History of Science’, Cambridge Philosophical Transactions, 9, pp. 139–47.
Whewell, [1858]: Novum Organon Renovatum. Being the second part of the philosophy of the inductive sciences. Third edition, 1858.
Whewell, [1860]: On the Philosophy of Discovery, Chapters Historical and Critical, 1860.
Whittaker, [1947]: From Euclid to Eddington, 1947.
Whittaker, [1953]: History of the Theories of Aether and Electricity, Vol. II, 1953.
Wisdom, [1063]: ‘The Refutability of “Irrefutable” Laws’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 13, pp. 303–6.
Wu, [1966]: ‘Beta Decay’, in Rendiconti della Scuola Internazionale di Fisica, “Enrico Fermi”, XXXII Corso.
Wu, and Moskowski, [1966]: Beta Decay, 1966.