Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 42
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Malloy, Lindsay C. Mugno, Allison P. Waschbusch, Daniel A. Pelham, William E. and Talwar, Victoria 2018. Parents’ Attitudes about and Socialization of Honesty and Dishonesty in Typically-Developing Children and Children with Disruptive Behavior Disorders. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology,

    Lavoie, Jennifer Nagar, Pooja Megha and Talwar, Victoria 2017. From Kantian to Machiavellian deceivers: Development of children’s reasoning and self-reported use of secrets and lies. Childhood, Vol. 24, Issue. 2, p. 197.

    Meibauer, Jörg 2017. Current Issues in Intercultural Pragmatics. Vol. 274, Issue. , p. 33.

    Whitley, Michael L. 2016. Leadership and Personnel Management. p. 948.

    Locher, Miriam A. Bolander, Brook and Höhn, Nicole 2015. Introducing relational work in Facebook and discussion boards. Pragmatics, Vol. 25, Issue. 1, p. 1.

    Whitley, Michael L. 2014. Cases on Communication Technology for Second Language Acquisition and Cultural Learning. p. 263.

    Heiskala, Risto 2014. Toward semiotic sociology: A synthesis of semiology, semiotics and phenomenological sociology. Social Science Information, Vol. 53, Issue. 1, p. 35.

    Mann, Heather Garcia-Rada, Ximena Houser, Daniel Ariely, Dan and Mesoudi, Alex 2014. Everybody Else Is Doing It: Exploring Social Transmission of Lying Behavior. PLoS ONE, Vol. 9, Issue. 10, p. e109591.

    Pascual, Esther 2014. Fictive Interaction. Vol. 47, Issue. ,

    Keane, Webb 2014. Affordances and reflexivity in ethical life: An ethnographic stance. Anthropological Theory, Vol. 14, Issue. 1, p. 3.

    Moore, Kevin Ezra 2014. The Spatial Language of Time. Vol. 42, Issue. ,

    Xu, Fen Evans, Angela D. Li, Chunxia Li, Qinggong Heyman, Gail and Lee, & Kang 2013. The role of honesty and benevolence in children’s judgments of trustworthiness. International Journal of Behavioral Development, Vol. 37, Issue. 3, p. 257.

    Ganapathy-Coleman, Hemalatha 2013. Speaking About Independence and Family Closeness: Socialisation Beliefs of Immigrant Indian Hindu Parents in the United States. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, Vol. 42, Issue. 4, p. 393.

    Buchholz, Michael B. 2013. Supervisions- und Coachingprozesse erforschen. p. 77.

    Fallis, Don 2012. Lying as a Violation of Grice's First Maxim of Quality. Dialectica, Vol. 66, Issue. 4, p. 563.

    Cameron, Catherine Ann Lau, Cindy Fu, Genyue and Lee, Kang 2012. Development of children’s moral evaluations of modesty and self-promotion in diverse cultural settings. Journal of Moral Education, Vol. 41, Issue. 1, p. 61.

    Ackert, Lucy F. Church, Bryan K. Kuang, Xi (Jason) and Qi, Li 2011. Lying: An Experimental Investigation of the Role of Situational Factors. Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 21, Issue. 04, p. 605.

    Keane, Webb 2011. Indexing Voice: A Morality Tale. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, Vol. 21, Issue. 2, p. 166.

    Heyman, Gail D. Itakura, Shoji and Lee, Kang 2011. Japanese and American Children's Reasoning about Accepting Credit for Prosocial Behavior. Social Development, Vol. 20, Issue. 1, p. 171.

    Sweet, Monica A. Heyman, Gail D. Fu, Genyue and Lee, Kang 2010. Are there limits to collectivism? Culture and children's reasoning about lying to conceal a group transgression. Infant and Child Development, p. n/a.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 1987
  • Online publication date: June 2012

2 - The definition of lie

Summary

This paper investigates how the semantic structure of one English word depends on, and reflects, our models of relevant areas of experience. As a linguist, my original concern was with the problems posed by the word lie for traditional semantic theories; but these problems led inexorably to the cultural models of informational exchange that motivate the existence of a semantic entity meaning lie. I begin by posing the semantic problem and go on to the cultural solution.

George Lakoff (1972), Fillmore (1977), and Coleman and Kay (1981) have argued against traditional generative and structuralist “checklists” of semantic features that constitute necessary and sufficient conditions for set-membership in the category denoted by a word. Lexical categories can have better or worse members, or partial members. Kay and McDaniel (1978) have shown that color categories lack necessary and sufficient conditions; red is a gradient quality whose category–boundaries are best described by fuzzy set theory rather than by traditional set theory. Checklist feature–definitions, which do not allow for color's being “sorta red,” must be replaced by a theory capable of dealing with fuzzy set–membership. Prototype semantics views word–meaning as determined by a central or prototypical application, rather than a category–boundaries. Clear definitions can thus be given for words with fuzzy boundaries of application. We define the best instance of a word's use, and expect real-world cases to fit this best example more or less, rather than perfectly or not at all.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Cultural Models in Language and Thought
  • Online ISBN: 9780511607660
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607660
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×