References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 April 2019
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Debating Unemployment PolicyPolitical Communication and the Labour Market in Western Europe, pp. 308 - 331Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Anastasia, Bruno, Bertazzon, Letizia, Disarò, Massimo, Emireni, Gianluca and Rasera, Maurizio (2011). Chi percepisce l’indennità di disoccupazione? Tassi di copertura e selettività dei requisiti richiesti. Veneto: Working Paper.Google Scholar
Ansell, Chris, Reckhow, Sarah and Kelly, Andrew (2009). ‘How to Reform a Reform Coalition: Outreach, Agenda Expansion, and Brokerage in Urban School Reform’. Policy Studies Journal, 37(4), 717–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, Iyengar, Shanto, Simon, Adam and Valentino, Nicholas (1994). ‘Does Attack Advertisement Demobilize the Electorate?’ American Political Science Review, 88(4), 829–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anstead, Nick and Chadwick, Andrew (2009). ‘Parties, Election Campaigning, and the Internet: Toward a Comparative Institutional Approach’. In Chadwick, Andrew and Howard, Philip N. (eds.): Handbook of Internet Politics. New York: Routledge, pp. 56–71.Google Scholar
Arcenaux, Kevin (2006). ‘Do Campaigns Help Voters Learn? A Cross-national Analysis’. British Journal of Political Science, 36(1), 159–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armingeon, Klaus (1997). ‘Swiss Corporatism in Comparative Perspective’. West European Politics, 20(4), 164–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armingeon, Klaus (2012). ‘The Politics of Fiscal Responses to the Crisis 2008–2009’. Governance, 25(4), 543–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baccaro, Lucio and Simoni, Marco (2008). ‘Policy Concertation in Europe: Explaining Government’s Choice’. Comparative Political Studies, 41(1), 1323–1348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bächtiger, André, Pedrini, Seraina and Ryser, Mirjam (2010a). ‘Prozessanalyse Politischer Entscheidungen: Diskurstypen und Sequenzialisierung’. In Behnke, Joachim, Bräuninger, Thomas and Shikano, Susumu (eds.): Jahrbuch für Handlungs- und Entscheidungstheorie. Band 6: Schwerpunkt Neuere Entwicklungen des Konzepts der Rationalität und ihre Anwendungen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 193–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bächtiger, André, Niemeyer, Simon, Neblo, Simon, Steenbergen, Marco R. and Steiner, Jürg (2010b). ‘Disentangling Diversity in Deliberative Democracy: Competing Theories, Their Blind-spots, and Complementarities’. Journal of Political Philosophy, 18(1), 32–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badie, Bertrand and Birnbaum, Pierre (1983). The Sociology in the State. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Baglioni, Simone, Porta, Donatella Della and Graziano, Paolo (2008). ‘The Contentious Politics of Unemployment: The Italian Case in Comparative Perspective’. European Journal of Political Research, 47(6), 827–851.Google Scholar
Barabas, Jason (2004). ‘How Deliberation Affects Policy Opinions’. American Political Science Review, 98(4), 687–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbier, Jean-Claude and Fargion, Valeria (2004) ‘Continental Invonsistencies on the Path to Activation: Consequences for Social Citizenship in Italy and France’. European Societies, 6(4): 437–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbier, Jean-Claude and Ludwig-Mayerhofer, Wolfgang (2004). ‘Introduction: The Many Worlds of Activation’. European Societies, 6(4), 424–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardi, Luciano (2007). ‘Electoral Change and Its Impact on the Party System in Italy’. West European Politics, 30(4), 711–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartolini, Stefano (2000). The Political Mobilization of the European Left, 1860–1980: The Class Cleavage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartolini, Stefano, Chiaramonte, Alessandro and D’Alimonte, Roberto (2004). ‘The Italian Party System Between Parties and Coalitions’. West European Politics, 27(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R. and Jones, Brian D. (2002). Policy Dynamics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R. and Leech, Beth L. (1998). Basic Interests: The Importance of Groups in Politics and in Political Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Béland, Daniel (2001). ‘Does Labor Matter? Institutions, Labor Unions, and Pension Reform in France and the United States’. Journal of Public Policy, 21(2), 153–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, W. Lance (1990a). ‘Taking the Public by Storm: Information, Cuing, and the Democratic Process in the Gulf Conflict’. Political Communication, 10(4), 331–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, W. Lance (1990b). ‘Toward a Theory of Press-state Relations in the United Stats’. Journal of Communication, 40(2), 103–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, W. Lance, Pickard, Viktor W. and Iozzi, David P. (2004). ‘Managing the Public Sphere: Journalistic Construction of the Great Globalization Debate’. Journal of Communication, 54(3), 437–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benson, Rodney (2014). Shaping Immigration News: A French-american Comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Berinsky, Adam J. and Kinder, Donald R. (2006). ‘Making Sense of Issues Through Media Frames: Understanding the Kosovo Crisis’. Journal of Politics, 68(3), 640–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernhard, Laurent (2012). Campaign Strategy in Direct Democracy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernhard, Laurent (2015). ‘Going Negative in Direct-democratic Campaigns’. In Nai, Alessandro and Walter, Annemarie (eds.): New Perspectives on Negative Campaigning: Why Attack Politics Matters. Colchester: ECPR Press, pp. 147–164.Google Scholar
Berton, Fabio, Richiardi, Matteo and Sacchi, Stefano (2009). ‘Flessibilità del lavoro e precarietà dei lavoratori in Italia’. Rivista Italiana di Politiche Pubbliche, 1, 33–70.Google Scholar
Bertozzi, Fabio and Bonoli, Giuliano (2002). ‘Verso una convergenza delle politiche nazionali per l’occupazione? La costruzione di un modello europeo attraverso il metodo di coordinamento aperto’. Rivista Italiana di Politiche Pubbliche 3, 31–57.Google Scholar
Beyers, Jan (2004). ‘Voice and Access: Political Practices of European Interest Associations’. European Union Politics, 5(2), 211–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumler, Jay G. and Gurevitch, Michael (1995). The Crisis of Public Communication. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Blyth, Mark (2002). Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boczkowski, Pablo J., Mitchelstein, Eugenia and Marin, Walter (2011). ‘Convergence Across Divergence: Understanding the Gap in the Online News Choices of Journalists and Consumers in Western Europe and Latin America’. Communication Research, 38(3), 376–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boeri, Tito, Hanson, Gordon H. and McCormick, Barry (2002). Immigration Policy and the Welfare System. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohl, Marian (2016). Explaining the Choice for Personalization as a Campaign Strategy. Dissertation, manuscript, University of Zurich.Google Scholar
Bonoli, Giuliano (2000). The Politics of Pension Reform: Institutions and Policy Change in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonoli, Giuliano (2005). ‘The Politics of the New Social Policies: Providing Coverage Against New Social Risks in Mature Welfare States’. Policy and Politics, 33(3), 431–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonoli, Giuliano (2006). ‘New Social Risks and the Politics of Post-industrial Social Policies’. In Armingeon, Klaus and Bonoli, Giuliano (eds.): The Politics of Post-industrial Welfare States. London: Routledge, pp. 3–26.Google Scholar
Bonoli, Giuliano (2007). ‘Too Narrow and Too Wide at Once: The “Welfare State” as a Dependent Variable in Policy Analysis’. In Clasen, Jochen and Siege, Nico A. (eds.): Investigating Welfare State Change: The “Dependent Variable Problem” in Comparative Analysis. Northampton: Edward Elgar, pp. 24–39.Google Scholar
Bonoli, Giuliano (2010). ‘The Political Economy of Active Labour Market Policy’. Politics and Society, 38(4), 435–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonoli, Giuliano (2013) The Origins of Active Social Policy: Labour Market and Childcare Policies in a Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonoli, Giuliano (2012). ‘Active Labour Market Policy and Social Investment: A Changing Relationship’. In Morel, Nathalie, Palier, Bruno and Palme, Joakim (eds.): Towards a Social Investment Welfare State? Ideas, Policies and Challenges. Bristol: The Policy Press, pp. 181–204.Google Scholar
Bonoli, Giuliano and Emmenegger, Patrick (2010). ‘State-society Relationships, Social Trust and the Development of Labour Market Policies in Italy and Sweden’. West European Politics, 33(4), 830–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonoli, Giuliano and Mach, André (2001). ‘The New Swiss Employment Puzzle’. Swiss Political Science Review, 7(2), 81–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonoli, Giuliano and Natali, David (2012). The Politics of the New Welfare States: Analysing Reforms in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boorstin, Daniel Joseph (1977). The Image: A Guide to Pseudo-events in America. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
Boydstun, Amber, Hardy, Anne and Walgrave, Stefaan (2014). ‘Two Faces of Media Attention: Media Storm Versus Non-storm Coverage’, Political Communication, 31(4), 501–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, David, Huber, Evelyne, Moller, Stephanie, Nielsen, François and Stephens, John D. (2003). ‘Distribution and Redistribution in Postindustrial Democracies’, World Politics, 55(2), 193–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brants, Kees and van Praag, Philip (2006). ‘Signs of Media Logic: Half a Century of Political Communication in the Netherlands’. Javnos – The Public, 13(1), 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bredgaard, Thomas, Larsen, Flemming and Madsen, Per Krogshøj (2006). ‘Opportunities and Challenges for Flexicurity – The Danish Example’. Transfer, 12(1), 61–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budge, Ian and Farlie, Dennis (1983). ‘Party Competition – Selective Emphasis or Direct Confrontation? An Alternative View with Data’. In Daalder, Hans and Mair, Peter (eds.): Western European Party Systems: Continuity and Change. Beverly Hills: Sage, pp. 267–305.Google Scholar
Burstein, Paul (1998). Discrimination, Jobs, and Politics: The Struggle for Equal Employment Opportunity in the United States Since the New Deal. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carragee, Kevin M. and Roefs, Wim (2004). ‘The Neglect of Power in Recent Framing Research’. The Journal of Communication, 54(2), 214–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casey, Bernard H. (2004). ‘The OECD Jobs Strategy and the European Employment Strategy: Two Views of the Labour Market and the Welfare State’. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 10 (3), 329–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Champion, Cyrielle (2011). ‘Switzerland: A Latecomer Catching Up?’. In Clasen, Jochen and Clegg, Daniel (eds.): Regulating the Risk of Unemployment. National Adaptations to Post-industrial Labour Markets in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 121–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chong, Dennis and Druckman, James N. (2007a). ‘Framing Public Opinion in Competitive Democracies’. American Political Science Review, 101(4), 637–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chong, Dennis and Druckman, James N. (2007b). ‘A Theory of Framing and Opinion Formation in Competitive Elite Environments’. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 99–118.Google Scholar
Chong, Dennis and Druckman, James N. (2007c). ‘Framing Theory’. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 103–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claassen, Ryan (2011). ‘Political Awareness and Electoral Campaigns: Maximum Effects for Minimum Citizens?’ Political Behavior, 33(2), 203–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clasen, Jochen (2011). ‘The United Kingdom: Towards a Single Working-age Benefit System’. In Clasen, Jochen and Clegg, Daniel (eds.): Regulating the Risk of Unemployment. National Adaptations to Post-industrial Labour Markets in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 15–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clasen, Jochen and Clegg, Daniel (2011). Regulating the Risk of Unemployment: National Adaptations to Post-industrial Labour Markets in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clasen, Jochen, Clegg, Daniel and Kvist, Jon (2012). European Labour Market Policies in (the) Crisis. Brussels: EUI aisbl (Working Paper).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobb, Roger and Elder, Charles D. (1972). Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda Building. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Colombo, Céline and Kriesi, Hanspeter (2017). ‘Party, Policy – or Both? Partisan-biased Processing of Policy Arguments in Direct Democracy’. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 27(3), 235–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottle, Simon and Rai, Mugdha (2006). ‘Between Display and Deliberation: Analyzing TV News as Communicative Architecture’. Media Culture and Society, 28(2), 163–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couldry, Nich and Hepp, Andreas (2012). ‘Comparing Media Cultures’. In Esser, Frank and Hanitzsch, Thomas (eds.): Handbook of Comparative Communication Research. London: Routledge, pp. 249–261.Google Scholar
Culpepper, Pepper D. (2002). ‘Power, Puzzling, and Pacting: The informational Logic of Negotiated Reforms’. Journal of European Public Policy, 9(5), 774–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpepper, Pepper D. (2011). Quiet Politics and Business Power: Corporate Control in Europe and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Czada, Roland (2005). ‘Social Policy: Crisis and Transformation’. In Greene, Simon and Paterson, William (eds.): Governance in Modern Germany: The Semisovereign State Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 165–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daguerre, Anne (2007). Active Labour Market Policies and Welfare Reform. Europe and the US in Comparative Perspective. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daguerre, Anne and Taylor-Gooby, Peter (2004). ‘Neglecting Europe: Explaining the Predominance of American Ideas in New Labour’s Welfare Policies Since 1997’. Journal of European Social Policy, 14(1), 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. (1961). Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Danielian, Lucig H. and Page, Benjamin I. (1994). ‘The Heavenly Chorus: Interest Group Voices on TV News’. American Journal of Political Science, 38(4), 1056–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dares, (2010). Les apprentis sortis du système scolaire en 2004: 86% des jeunes en emploi trois ans après la fin du contrat d’apprentissage. Paris.Google Scholar
Deacon, Alan (2000). ‘Learning from the US? The Influence of American Ideas Upon “New Labour” Thinking on Welfare Reform’. Policy and Politics, 28(1), 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demers, David K. (1998). ‘Structural Pluralism, Corporate Newspaper Structure, and News Source Perceptions: Another Test of the Editorial Vigor Hypothesis’. Journalism and Masse Communication Quarterly, 75(3), 572–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vries, Raymond, Aimee Stanczyk, Ian F. Wall, Rebecca Uhlmann, Damschroder, Laura J. and Kim, Scott Y. (2010). ‘Assessing the Quality of Democratic Deliberation: A Case Study of Public Deliberation on the Ethis of Surrogate Consent for Research‘. Social Science and Medicine, 70(12), 1896–1903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diani, Mario (2003). ‘Leaders or Brokers? Position and Influence in Social Movements Networks’. In Diani, Mario and McAdam, Doug (eds.): Social Movements and Networks: Relational Approaches to Collective Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 105–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimitrova, Daniela V. and Strömbäck, Jesper (2009). ‘Look Who’s Talking’. Journalism Practice, 3(1), 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dingledey, Irene (2010). ‘Agenda 2010: Dualisierung der Arbeitsmarktpolitik’. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 48(10), 18–25.Google Scholar
Dingledey, Irene (2011). ‘Germany: Moving Towards Integration whilst Maintaining Segmentation’. In Clasen, Jochen and Clegg, Daniel (eds.): Regulating the Risk of Unemployment. National Adaptations to Post-industrial Labour Markets in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 55–74.Google Scholar
Disch, Lisa (2012). ‘The Impurity of Representation and the Vitality of Democracy’. Cultural Studies, 26(1), 207–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, Anthony (1972). ‘Up and Down with Ecology: The “Issue Attention Cycle”’. Public Interest, 28(1), 28–50.Google Scholar
Druckman, James N. (2001). ‘On the Limits of Framing Effects: Who Can Frame?’. Journal of Politics, 63(4), 1041–1066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, James N., Peterson, Erik and Slothuus, Rune (2013). ‘How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation’. American Political Science Review, 107(1), 57–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DWP (Department for Work and Pensions) (2010). Universal Credit: Welfare That Works. London.Google Scholar
Eagly, Alice H. and Chaiken, Shelly (1993). The Psychology of Attitudes. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.Google Scholar
Ebbinghaus, Bernhard (2006). Reforming Early Retirement in Europe, Japan and the USA. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebbinghaus, Bernhard (2010). ‘Reforming Bismarckian Corporatism: The Changing Role of Social Partnership in Continental Europe’. In Palier, Bruno (ed.): A Long Goodbye to Bismarck? The Politics of Welfare State Reform in Continental Europe. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 255–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichengreen, Barry (2012). ‘European Monetary Integration with Benefit of Hindsight’. Common Market Studies, 50(1), 123–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jon (1976). ‘Some Conceptual Problems in Political Theory’. In Berry, Brian (ed.): Power and Political Theory: Some European Perspectives. London: Wiley, pp. 245–270.Google Scholar
Emmenegger, Patrick (2009). ‘Barriers to Entry: Insider/Outsider Politics and the Political Determinants of Job Security Regulations’. Journal of European Social Policy, 19(2): 131–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmenegger, Patrick (2010a). ‘The Long Road to Flexicurity: The Development of Job Security Regulations in Denmark and Sweden’. Scandinavian Political Studies, 33(3), 271–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmenegger, Patrick (2010b). ‘Low Statism in Coordinated Market Economies: The Development of Job Security Regulations in Switzerland’. International Political Science Review, 31(2), 187–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Entman, Robert M. (1993). ‘Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm’. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Entman, Robert M. (2003). ‘Cascading Activation: Contesting the White House’s Frame After 9/11’. Political Communication, 20(4), 415–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Entman, Robert M. (2004). Projections of Power Framing News, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Esaiasson, Peter and Narud, Hanne Marthe (2013). Between-election Democracy: The Representative Relationships After Election Day. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta (1990). Three Worlds of Welfare State Capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta (1996). ‘Welfare States Without Work: The Impasse of Labour Sheddling and Familiarism in Continental European Social Policy’. In Esping-Andersen, Gøsta (ed.): Welfare States in Transition: National Adaptions in Global Economies. London: Sage, pp. 66–87.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta (2009). The Incomplete Revolution: Adapting to Women’s New Roles. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Esser, Frank (1999). ‘Tabloidization of News: A Comparative Analysis of Anglo-American and German Press Journalism’. European Journal of Communication, 14(3), 291–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esser, Frank (2008). ‘Dimensions of Political News Cultures: Sound Bite and Image Bite News in France, Germany, Great Britain, and the United States’. International Journal of Press/Politics, 13(4), 401–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esser, Frank (2013). ‘Mediatization as a Challenge: Media Logic versus Political Logic’ In Kriesi, Hanspeter, Lavenex, Sandra, Esser, Frank, Matthes, Jörg, Bühlmann, Marc and Bochsler, Daniel (eds.): Democracy in the Age of Globalization and Mediatization. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 155–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esser, Frank, de Vreese, Claes H., Strömbäck, Jesper, van Aelst, Peter, Aalberg, Toril, Stanyer, James, Lengauer, Günther, Berganza, Rosa, Legnante, Guido, Papathanassopoulos, Stylianos, Salgado, Susana, Sheafer, Tamir and Reinemann, Carsten (2012). ‘Political Information Opportunities in Europe. A Longitudinal and Comparative Study of Thirteen Television Systems’. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 17(3), 247–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esser, Frank and Hanitzsch, Thomas (eds.) (2013). The Handbook of Comparative Communication Research. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esser, Frank and Matthes, Jörg (2013). ‘Mediatization Effects on Political News, Political Actors, Political Decisions and Political Audiences’. In Kriesi, Hanspeter, Lavenex, Sandra, Esser, Frank, Matthes, Jörg, Bühlmann, Marc and Bochsler, Daniel (eds.): Democracy in the Age of Globalization and Mediatization. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 177–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esser, Frank and Strömbäck, Jesper (2012a). ‘Comparing Election Campaign Communication’. In Esser, Frank and Hanitzsch, Thomas (eds.): Handbook of Comparative Communication Research. London: Routledge, pp. 289–307.Google Scholar
Esser, Frank and Strömbäck, Jesper (2012b). ‘Comparing News on Elections’. In Esser, Frank and Hanitzsch, Thomas (eds.): Handbook of Comparative Communication Research. London: Routledge, pp. 308–327.Google Scholar
Estevez-Abe, Margarita, Iversen, Torben and Soskice, David (2001). ‘Social Protection and the Formation of Skills’. In Hall, Peter A. and Soskice, David (eds.): Varieties of Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 145–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, Henry and John, Quiggin (2012): Consensus, Dissensus and Economic Ideas: The Rise and Fall of Keynesianism During the Economic Crisis.Google Scholar
Ferree, Myra Marx, Gamson, William A., Gerhards, Jürgen and Rucht, Dieter (2002). Shaping Abortion Discourse. Democracy and the Public Sphere in Germany and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrera, Maurizio (1996). ‘The “Southern Model” of Welfare in Social Europe’. Journal of European Social Policy, 8(1), 17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrera, Maurizio (2012). Ideological Change and Social Policy in Europe: Towards a Liberal Neo-Welfarism. Florence: EUI (Working Paper).Google Scholar
Ferrera, Maurizio and Gualmini, Elisabetta (2004). Rescued by Europe? Social and Labour Market Reforms in Italy from Maastricht to Berlusconi. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Fillieule, Olivier and Tartakowsky, Danielle (2008). La manifestation. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkel, Steven E. (1993). ‘Re-examining the “Minimal Effects” Model in Recent Presidential Campaigns’. Journal of Politics, 55(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Manuel, Fischer, Alex and Sciarini, Pascal (2009). ‘Power and Conflict in the Swiss Political Elite: An Aggregation of Existing Network Analyses’. Swiss Political Science Review, 15(1), 31–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiske, , Susan, T. and Taylor, Shelley E. (1991). Social Cognition. New York: McGraw-Hill (2nd edition).Google Scholar
Fleckenstein, Timo (2008). ‘Restructuring Welfare for the Unemployed: The Hartz Legislation in Germany’. Journal of European Social Policy, 18(2), 177–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fournier, Patrick, Cutler, Fred, Soroka, Stuart and Lyle, Greg (2004). Who Responds to Elections Campaigns? The Two-mediator Model Revisited. University of Montréal (Working Paper).Google Scholar
Fossati, Flavia (2017a) ‘How Regimes Shape Preferences. A Study of Political Actors’ Labour Market Policy Preferences in Flexicurity and Dualizing Countries’, Socio-economic Review 16(3): 523–544. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwx040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fossati, Flavia (2017b) ‘Who Wants Demanding Active Labour Market Policies? Public Attitudes Towards Policies That Put Pressure on the Unemployed’. Journal of Social Policy, 47(1): 77–97 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279417000216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallie, Ducan and Paugam, Serge (2000). ‘The Experience of Unemployment in Europe: The Debate’. In Gallie, Duncan and Paugam, Serge (eds.): Welfare Regimes and the Experience of Unemployment in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galtung, Johan and Ruge, Marie H. (1965). ‘The Structure of Foreign News’. Journal of Peace Research, 2(1), 64–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamson, William A. and Meyer, David S. (1996). ‘Framing Political Opportunity’. In John, D. McCarthy, John Zald, D. and Zald, Mayer N. (eds.): Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 275–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamson, William A. and Modigliani, Andre (1987). ‘The Changing Culture of Affirmative Action’. Research in Political Sociology, 3(1), 137–177.Google Scholar
Gans, Herbert J. (1979). Deciding What’s News: A Study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Andrew, Gelman, Park, David, Shor, Boris, Bafumi, Joseph and Cortina, Jeronimo (2008). Red State, Blue State, Rich State, Poor State. Why American Vote the Way They Do. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gelman, Andrew and King, Gary (1993). ‘Why Are American Presidential Election Campaign Polls So Variable When Votes Are So Predictable?’. British Journal of Political Science, 23(4), 409–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, Rachel and Römmele, Andrea (2008). ‘Political Communication’. In Caramani, Daniele (ed.): Comparative Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 473–491.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony (2000). The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Neil (2002). Transformation of the Welfare State: The Silent Surrender of Public Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gingrich, Jane and Ansell, Ben (2011). The Dynamics of Social Investment: Human Capital, Activation, and Care. Working Paper.Google Scholar
Giugni, Marco (2010). The Contentious Politics of Unemployment in Europe: Welfare State and Political Opportunities. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glyn, Andrew (2006). Capitalism Unleashed: Finance Globalization and Welfare. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gourevitch, Peter (1984). ‘Breaking with Orthodoxy: The Politics of Economic Policy Responses to the Depression of the 1930s’. International Organization, 38(1), 95–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gourevitch, Peter (1986). Politics in Hard Times: Comparative Responses to International Economic Crisis. Cornell: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Graber, Doris (2003). ‘The Media and Democracy: Beyond Myths and Stereotypes’. Annual Review of Political Science, 6(1), 139–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graziano, Paolo (2007). ‘Adapting to the European Employment Strategy? Recent Developments in Italian Employment Policy’. The International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations, 23(4), 543–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green-Pedersen, Christoffer (2010). ‘The Dependent Variable Problem Within the Study of Welfare State Retrenchment: Defining the Problem and Looking for Solutions’. Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 6(1), 3–14.Google Scholar
Green-Pedersen, Christoffer and Mortensen, Peter B. (2004). Who Sets the Agenda and Who Responds to It in the Danish Parliament? A New Model of Issue Competition and Agenda‐setting. European Journal of Political Research, 49(2), 257–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurevitch, Michael and Blumler, Jay G. (2004). ‘State of the Art of Comparative Political Communication Research: Posed for Maturity?’. In Esser, Frank and Pfetsch, Barbara (eds.): Comparing Political Communication. Theories, Cases, and Challenges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 325–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1981). Theorie kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Haberman, Jürgen (1992). Faktizität und Geltung: Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaaates. Frankfurt am Main: SuhrkampGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1996). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. New Baskerville: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hackett, Robert A. (1985). ‘A Hierarchy of Access: Aspects of Source Bias on Canadian TV News’. Journalism Quarterly, 62(2), 256–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter A. (1990). ‘Pluralism and Pressure Politics’. In Hall, Peter A., Hayward, Jack and Machin, Howard (eds.): Developments in French Politics. London: Macmillan, pp. 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter A. (1993). ‘Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain’. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter A. (1997). ‘The Role of Interests, Institutions and Ideas in the Comparative Political Economy of the Industrialized Nations’. In Lichbach, Mark I. and Zuckerman, Alan S. (eds.): Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 174–207.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A. (2005). ‘Preference Formation as a Political Process: The Case of Monetary Union in Europe’. In Katznelson, Ira and Weingast, Barry R. (eds.): Preferences and Situations: Points of Intersection Between Historical and Rational Choice Institutionalism. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 129–160.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A. and Gingerich, Daniel (2009). ‘Varieties of Capitalism and Institutional Complementarities in the Political Economy’. British Journal of Political Science, 39(3), 449–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter A. and Soskice, David (2001). Varieties of Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallin, Daniel C. (1992). ‘Sound Bit News: Television Coverage of Elections, 1968-1988’. Journal of Communication, 42(2), 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallin, Daniel C. and Mancini, Paolo (2004). Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamann, Kerstin and Kelly, John (2004). ‘Unions as Political Actors: Revitalization?’. In Frege, Carola M. and Kelly, John (eds.): Varieties of Unionism: Strategies for Union Revitalization in a Globalizing Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 93–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handler, Joel F. (2003). ‘Social Citizenship and Workfare in the US and Western Europe: from Status to Contract’. Journal of European Social Policy, 13(3), 229–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handler, Joel F. (2004). Social Citizenship and Workfare in the United States and Western Europe: The Paradox of Inclusion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hänggli, Regula (2012a). ‘Key Factors in Frame Building: How Strategic Political Actors Shape News Media Coverage’. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(3), 300–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hänggli, Regula (2012b). ‘Key factors in Frame Building’. In Kriesi, Hanspeter (ed.): Political Communication in Direct Democratic Campaigns. Enlightening or Manipulating? Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 125–142.Google Scholar
Hänggli, Regula (2018). The Origin of Dialogue in the News Media University of Fribourg (Book manuscript).Google Scholar
Hänggli, Regula and Kriesi, Hanspeter (2010). ‘Political Framing Strategies and Their Impact on Media Framing in a Swiss Direct-democratic Campaign’. Political Communication, 27(2): 141–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hänggli, Regula and Kriesi, Hanspeter (2012). ‘Frame Construction and Frame Promotion (Strategic Framing Choices)’. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(3), 260–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harmel, Robert and Janda, Kenneth (1994). ‘An Integrated Theory of Party Goals and Party Change’. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 6(3), 259–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassel, Anke (2003). ‘The Politics of Social Pacts’. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 41(4), 707–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassel, Anke (2006). Wage Setting, Social Pacts and the Euro: A New Role for the State. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassel, Anke and Williamson, Hugh (2004). The Evolution of the German Model: How to Judge Reforms in Europe’s Largest Economy. Working Paper.Google Scholar
Häusermann, Silja (2006). ‘Changing Coalitions in Social Policy Reforms: The Politics of New Social Needs and Demands’. Journal of European Social Policy, 16(1): 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Häusermann, Silja (2010). The Politics of Welfare State Reform in Continental Europe: Modernization in Hard Times. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Häusermann, Silja and Palier, Bruno (2008). ‘The Politics of Employment-friendly Welfare Reforms in Post-industrial Economies’, Socio-Economic Review 6: 559–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Häusermann, Silja, Picot, Georg and Geering, Dominik (2013). Review Article: Rethinking Party Politics and the Welfare State – Recent Advances in the Literature, British Journal of Political Science, 43(1): 221–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helbling, Marc, Höglinger, Dominic and Wüest, Bruno (2010). ‘How Political Parties Frame European Integration’. European Journal of Political Research, 49(4), 495–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helbling, Marc, Höglinger, Dominic and Wüest, Bruno (2012). ‘The Impact of Arenas in Public Debates over Globalization’. In Kriesi, Hanspeter, Grande, Edgar, Dolezal, Martin, Helbling, Marc, Höglinger, Dominic, Hutter, Swen and Wüest, Bruno (eds.): Political Conflict in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 207–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemerijck, Anton and Eichhorst, Werner (2010). ‘Whatever Happened to the Bismarckian Welfare State? From Labor-shedding to Employment-friendly Reforms’. In Palier, Bruno (ed.): A Long Goodbye to Bismarck? The Politics of Welfare Reform in Continental Europe. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 301–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilgartner, Stephen and Bosk, Charles L. (1988). ‘The Rise and Fall of Social Problems: A Public Arenas Model’. American Journal of Sociology, 94(1): 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillygus, Sunshine (2010). ‘Campaign Effects on Vote Choice’. In Leighly, Jan and Edwards, George C. III (eds.): Oxford Handbook on Elections and Political Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 326–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinrichs, Karl and Kangas, Olli (2003). ‘When Is a Change Big Enough to Be a System Shift? Small System-shifting Changes in German and Finnish Pension Policies’. Social Policy and Administration, 37(6), 573–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. (1991). The Rhetoric of Reaction. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, Chris (2006). Trade Unions and the State. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Huber, Evelyne and Stephens, John D. (2001). Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Immergut, Ellen M. (1990). ‘Institutions, Veto Points, and Policy Results: A Comparative Analysis of Health Care’. Journal of Public Policy, 10(4), 391–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingold, Karin and Varone, Frédéric (2011). ‘Treating Policy Brokers Seriously: Evidence from Climate Policy’. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(2), 319–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, Torben (1999). Contested Economic Institutions: The Politics of Macroeconomics and Wage Bargaining in Advanced Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Iversen, Torben and Wren, Anne (1998). ‘Equality, Employment, and Budgetary Restraint: The Trilemma of the Service Economy’. World Politics, 50(4), 507–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto and McGrady, Jennifer A. (2007). Media Politics: A Citizen’s Guide. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, Norpoth, Helmut and Hahn, Kyu S. (2004). ‘Consumer Demand for Election News: The Horserace Sells’. Journal of Politics, 66(1), 157–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto and Simon, Adam F. (2000). ‘New Perspectives and Evidence on Political Communication and Campaign Effects’. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 149–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jagers, Jan and Walgrave, Stefaan (2007). ‘Populism as Political Communication Style: An Empirical Study of Political Parties’ Discourse in Belgium’. European Journal of Political Research, 46(3), 319–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jamieson, Kathleen Hall and Cappella, Joseph N. (1997). Echo Chamber: Rush Limaugh and the Conservative Media Establishment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jarren, Otfried (2000). ‘Gesellschaftliche Integration durch Medien? Zur Begründung normativer Anforderungen an Medien’. Medien und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 48(1), 22–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarren, Otfried and Donges, Patrick (2002). Politische Kommunikation in der Mediengesellschaft. Bd. 2: Akteure, Prozesse und Inhalte. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
Jasper, James M. (2004). ‘A Strategic Approach to Collective Action: Looking for Agency in Social Movement Choices’. Mobilization, 9(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jasper, James M. (2006). Getting Your Way: Strategic Dilemmas in the Real World. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jegen, Maya (2003). Energiepolitische Vernetzung in der Schweiz: Analyse der Kooperationsneztwerke und Ideensysteme der energiepolitischen Entscheidungsträger. Basel: Helbing and Lichtenhahn.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. Craig (1981). ‘Sociopolitical Movements’. In Long, Samuel L. (ed.): Handbook of Political Behaviour. Vol. 4. New York: Plenum Publishers, pp. 81–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins-Smith, Hank C. (1990). Democratic Politics and Policy Analysis. Pacific Grove: Brooks and Cole.Google Scholar
Jerit, Jennifer (2004). ‘Survival of the Fittest: Rhetoric During the Course of an Election Campaign’. Political Psychology, 25(4), 563–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jessop, Bob (1993). ‘Towards a Schumpeterian Workfare State? Preliminary Remarks on Post-fordist Political Economy’. Studies in Political Economy, 40, 7–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jessoula, Matteo and Alti, Tiziana (2010). ‘Italy: An Uncompleted Departure from Bismarck’. In Palier, Bruno (ed.): A Long Goodbye to Bismarck? The Politics of Welfare Reform in Continental Europe. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 157–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jessoula, Matteo, Graziano, Paolo R. and Madama, Ilaria (2010). ‘Selective Flexicurity in Segmented Labour Markets: The Case of Italian Mid-Siders’. Journal of Social Policy, 39(4), 561–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Thomas J., Bichard, Shannon L. and Zhang, Weiwu (2009). ‘Communication Communities or ‘Cyberghettos’?: A Path Analysis Model Examining Factors that Explain Selective Exposure to Blogs’. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication, 15(1), 60–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Bryan D. (1994). Reconceiving Decision-making in Democratic Politics: Attention, Choice, and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, Henning and Schulze, Michaela (2012). ‘A Double Farewell to a Former Model? Danish Unions and Activation Policy’. Local Economy, 27(5–6), 637–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karvonen, Lauri (2010). The Personalisation of Politics: A Study of Parliamentary Demoracies. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Noah, Park, David K. and Ridout, Travis N. (2006). ‘Dialogue in American Campaigns? An Examination of Issue Convergence in Candidate Television Advertising’. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 724–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter (1985). Small States in World Markets. Ithaca/New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret E. and Sikkink, Kathryn (1998). ‘Transnational Advocacy Networks in the Movement Society’. In Meyer, David S. and Tarrow, Sidney (eds.): The Social Movement Society: Contentious Politics for a New Century. Boulder: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 217–238.Google Scholar
Kemmerling, Achim and Bruttel, Oliver (2006). ‘New Politics in German Labour Market Policy? The Implications of the Recent Hartz Reforms for the German Welfare State’. West European Politics, 29(1): 90–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kepplinger, Hans Matthias (2009). Publizistische Konflikte und Skandale. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kernell, Samuel (1997). Going Public: New Strategies of Presidential Leadership. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
King, Desmond and Wickham-Jones, Mark (1999). ‘From Clinton to Blair: The Democratic (Party) Orignis of Welfare to Work’. The Political Quarterly, 79(1), 62–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiousis, Spiro, Mitrook, Michael, Xu Wu and Seltzer, Trent (2006). ‘First- und Second-Level Agenda-Buildung and Agenda-Setting Effects: Exploring the Linkages Among Candidate News Releases, Media Coverage, and Public Opinion During the 2002 Florida Gubernatorial Election’. Journal of Public Relations Research, 18(3), 265–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert (1994). The Transformation of European Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klar, Samar, Robison, Joshua and Druckman, James N. (2013). ‘Political Dynamics of Framing’. In Ridout, Travis N. (ed.): New Direction in Media and Politics. New York: Routledge, pp. 173–192.Google Scholar
Kluver, Randolph, Jankowski, Nicholas W., Foot, Kristen A. and Schneider, Steven M. (2007). The Internet and National Elections: A Comparative Study of Web Campaigning. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knoke, David, Pappi, Franz U., Broadbent, Jeff and Tsujinaka, Yutaka (1996). Comparing Policy Networks: Labor Politics in the U.S., Germany, and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koistinen, Pertti and Serrano, Pascual A. (2009). ‘Introduction’. In Koistinen, Pertti, Mósesdóttir, Lilja and Pascual, Amparo Serrano (eds.): Emerging Systems of Work and Welfare. Bruxelles: Peter Lang, pp. 95–114.Google Scholar
Kollman, Ken (1998). Outside Lobbying. Public Opinion and Interest Group Strategies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koopmans, Ruud (2004). ‘Movements and Media: Selection Processes and Evolutionary Dynamics in the Public Sphere’. Theory and Society, 33(3/4), 367–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koopmans, Ruud and Statham, Paul (1999). ‘Ethnic and Civic Conceptions of Nationhood and the Differential Success of the Extreme Right in Germany and Italy’. In Giugni, Marco, McAdam, Doug and Tilly, Charles (eds.): How Social Movements Matter. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 225–252.Google Scholar
Korpi, Walter (1980). ‘Social Policy and Distributional Conflict in the Capitalist Democracies. A Preliminary Comparative Framework’. West European Politics, 3(3), 296–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korpi, Walter (1983). The Democratic Class Struggle. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter (1980). Entscheidungsstrukturen und Entscheidungsprozesse in der Schweiz. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter (1998). ‘The Transformation of Cleavage Politics: The 1997 Stein Rokkan Lecture’. European Journal of Political Research, 33(2), 165–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter (2004). ‘Political Context and Opportunity’. In Snow, David H., Soule, Sarah A. and Kriesi, Hanspeter (eds.): The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 67–90.Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter (2007). Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, Teil I: Grundlagen. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter (2011). ‘Personalization of National Election Campaigns’. Party Politics, 23(1), 1–20.Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter (2014). ‘The Political Consequences of the Economic Crisis in Europe: Electoral Punishment and Popular Protest’. In Bermeo, Nancy and Bartels, Larry M. (eds.): Mass Politics in Tough Times: Opinions, Votes, and Protest in the Great Recession. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 297–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter, Adam, Silke and Jochum, Margit (2006). ‘Comparative Analysis of Policy Networks in Western Europe’. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(3), 341–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter, Bernhard, Laurent, Colombo, Céline, Hänggli, Regula, Schemer, Christian and Steenbergen, Marco (2012b). Campaign Effects: Voters‘ Information Processing in Swiss Direct Democratic Campaigns. Zurich: Working Paper.Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter and Bochsler, Daniel (2013). ‘Varieties of Democracy’. In Kriesi, Hanspeter, Lavenex, Sandra, Esser, Frank, Matthes, Jörg, Bühlmann, Marc and Bochsler, Daniel (eds.): Democracy in the Age of Globalization and Mediatization. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 69–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter, Grande, Edgar, Dolezal, Martin, Helbling, Marc, Höglinger, Dominic, Hutter, Swen and Wüest, Bruno (2012): Political Conflict in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter, Grande, Edgar, Lachat, Romain, Dolezal, Martin, Bornschier, Simon and Frey, Timotheos (2008). West European Politics in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter and Jegen, Maja (2001). ‘The Swiss Energy Policy Elite: The Actor Constellation of a Policy Domain in Transition’. European Journal of Political Research, 39(2), 251–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter, Ruud Kopmans, Jan W. Duyvendak, and Giugni, Marco R. (1995). New Social Movements in Western Europe: A Comparative analysis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter and Trechsel, Alex (2008). The Politics of Switzerland. Continuity and Change in a Consensus Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter, Tresch, Anke and Jochum, Margit (2007). ‘Going Public in the European Union: Action Repertoires of Western European Collective Political Actors’. European Journal of Political Research, 40(1), 48–73.Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter, Benrhard, Laurent and Hänggli, Regula (2009). The Politics of Campaigning – Dimensions of Strategic Action. In Marcinkowski, Frank and Pfetsch, Barbara (eds.): Politik in der Mediendemokratie. Wiesbaden: VS, pp. 345–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kübler, Daniel (2001). ‘Understanding Policy Change with the Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Application to Swiss Drug Policy’. Journal of European Public Policy, 8(4), 623–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuklinksi, James H. and Segura, Gary M. (1995). ‘Endogeneity, Exogeneity, Time, and Space in Political Representation’. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 20(1), 3–21.Google Scholar
Labbé, Dominique (1996). Syndicats et syndiqués en France depuis 1945. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Lahusen, Christian (2009). ‘The Hidden Hand of the European Union and the Silent Europeanization of Public Debates on Unemployment: The Case of the European Employment Strategy’. In Giugni, Marco (ed.): The Politics of Unemployment in Europe. Policy Responses and Collective Action. Farnham/Burlington: Ashgate, pp. 151–172.Google Scholar
Lane, Philip R. (2012). ‘The European Sovereign Debt Crisis’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26(3), 49–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laumann, Edward O. and Pappi, Franz U. (1976). Networks of Collective Action: A Perspective on Community Influence Systems. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Regina (2000). The Politics of Force: Media and the Construction of Police Brutality. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Nam-Jin, Mc Leod, Douglas M. and Shah, Dhavan V. (2008). ‘Framing Policy Debates, Issue Dualism, Journalistic Frames, and Opinions on Controversial Policy Issues’. Communication Research, 35(5), 695–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmbruch, Gerhard (1979). ‘Liberal Corporatism and Party Government’. In Schmitter, Philippe C. and Lehmbruch, Gerhard (eds.): Trends Toward Corporatist Intermediation. London: Sage, pp. 147–183.Google Scholar
Levy, Jonah D (1999). ‘Vice into Virtue? Progressive Politics and Welfare Reform in Continental Europe’. Politics and Society, 27(2), 239–273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis-Beck, Michael S. and Paldam, Martin (2000). Economic Voting: An Introduction. Electoral Studies, 19(2), 113–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arend, Lijphart (1999). Patterns of Democracy. Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend and Crepaz, Markus M. L. (1991). ‘Corporatism and Consensus Democracy in Eighteen Countries: Conceptual and Empirical Linkages’. British Journal of Political Science, 21(2), 235–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lilleker, Darren G., Koc-Michalska, Karolina, Schweitzer, Eva Johanna, Jacunski, Michal, Jackson, Nigel and Vedel, Thierry (2011). ‘Informing, Engaging, Mobilizing and Interacting: Searching for a European Model of Web Campaigning’. European Journal of Communication, 26(3), 195–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour and Rokkan, Stein (1985 [1967]). ‘Cleavage Structures, Party Systems and Voter Alignments’. In Lipset, Seymour (ed.): Consensus and Conflict. Essays in Political Sociology . New Brunswick: Transation Books, pp. 1–64.Google Scholar
Livingston, Steven and Lance Bennett, W. (2003). ‘Gatekeeping, Indexing, and Live-event News: Is Technology Altering the Construction of News?’. Political Communication, 20(4), 363–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lødemel, Ivar (2004). ‘The Development of Workfare Within Social Activation Policies’. In Gallie, Duncan (ed.): Resisting Marginalization. Unemployment Experience and Social Policy in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 197–222.Google Scholar
Lødemel, Ivar and Trickey, Heather (2001). An Offer You Can’t Refuse. Workfare in International Perspective. Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Mahoney, Christine (2007). ‘Networking vs. Allying: The Decision of Interest Groups to Join Coalition in the U.S. and the EU. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(2), 366–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mair, Peter (1997). ‘EE Schattschneider’s the Semisovereign People’. Political Studies, 45(5), 947–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, George E., Neuman, Russell W. and MacKuen, Michael (2000). Affective Intelligence and Political Judgments. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Manin, Bernard (1997). The Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mancini, Paolo (1997). ‘Professioneller Journalismus in Italien zwischen traditionellen Wurzeln und Anforderungen des Marktes: Eine Übersicht über wesentliche Charakteristika‘. In Kpper, Gert G. and Mancini, Paolo: Kulturen des Journalismus und politische Systeme. Dortmund: Vistas, pp. 93–108.Google Scholar
Martin, Cathie J. (2004). ‘Reinventing Welfare Regimes: Employers and the Implementation of Active Social Policy’. World Politics, 57(1), 39–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Cathie J. and Thelen, Kathleen (2007). ‘The State and Coordinated Capitalism: Contributions of the Public Sector to Social Solidarity in Postindustrial Societies’. World Politics, 60(1), 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazzoleni, Gianpietro (2008). ‘Populism and the Media’. In Albertazzi, Daniele and McDonnel, Duncan (eds.): Twenty-first Century Populism. The Spectre of Western European Democracy. Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdam, Doug, Tarrow, Sidney and Tilly, Charles (2001). Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClosky, Herbert and Chong, Dennis (1985). ‘Similarities and Differences Between Left-wing and Right-wing Radicals’. British Journal of Political Science, 15(3), 329–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McQuail, Dennis (1992). Media Performance: Mass Communication and the Public Interest. London: Sage.Google Scholar
McQuail, Dennis and Cuilenburg, Jan J. (1983). ‘Diversity as a Media Policy Goal’. Gazette, 31(3), 145–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meguid, Bonnie M. (2005). ‘Competition Between Unequals: The Role of Mainstream Party Strategy in Niche Party Success’. American Political Science Review, 99(3), 347–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morel, Nathalie, Palier, Bruno and Palme, Joakim (2012). Towards a Social Investment Welfare State? Ideas, Policies, and Challenges. Bristol: Chicago Policy Press.Google Scholar
Morris, Dick (1999). The New Prince: Machiavelli Update for the Twenty-first Century. Los Angeles: Renaissance Boooks.Google Scholar
Müller, Lisa (2014). Comparing Mass Media in Established Democracies: Patterns of Media Performance. Basingstoke: Palgrage Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myles, J. and Quadagno, J. (2002). ‘Political Theories of the Welfare State’. Social Service Review, 76 (1), 34–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadeau, Rihard, Nevitte, Neil, Gidengil, Elisabeth and Blais, André (2008). ‘Election Campaigns as Information Campaigns: Who Learns What and Does it Matter?’ Political Communication, 25(3), 229–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nai, Alessandro (2013). ‘What Really Matters is Which Camp Goes Dirty: Differential Effects of Negative Campaigning on Turnout During Swiss Federal Ballots’. European Journal of Political Research, 52(1), 44–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Thomas E., Oxley, Zoe M. and Clawson, Rosalee A. (1997). Toward a Psychology of Framing Effects. Political Behavior, 19(3), 221–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuman, W. Russell (1990). ‘The Threshold of Public Attention’. Public Opinion Quarterly, 54(2), 159–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowlin, Matthew C. (2011). ‘Theories of the Policy Process: State of the Research and Emerging Trends’. The Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 41–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oesch, Daniel (2006). Redrawing the Class Map. Stratification and Institutions in Britain, Germany, Sweden and Switzerland. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Oesch, Daniel (2007). ‘Weniger Koordination, mehr Markt? Kollektive Arbeitsbeziehungen und Neokorporatismus in der Schweiz seit 1990’. Swiss Political Science Review, 13(3), 337–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Opedal, Ståle, Rommetvedt, Hilmar and Vrangbæk, Karsten (2012). ‘Organised Interests, Authority Structures and Political Influence: Danish and Norwegian Patient Groups Compared’. Scandinavian Political Studies, 35(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tim, O’Reilly (2005). What is Web 2.0? Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. http://www.oreillynet.com/lpt/a/6228.Google Scholar
OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2006). OECD Employment Outlook: Boosting Jobs and Incomes. Paris.Google Scholar
Ossipow, William (1994). ‘Le système politique Suisse ou l’art de la compensation’. In Yannis, Papadopoulos (ed.): Elites politiques et peuple en Suisse : Analyse des votations fédérales (1970–1987.) Lausanne: Réalités sociales, pp. 9–56.Google Scholar
Palier, Bruno (2010). ‘The Dualization of the French Welfare State’. In Palier, Bruno (ed.): A Long Goodbye to Bismarck? Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 73–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palier, Bruno and Thelen, Kathleen (2010). ‘Dualization and Institutional Complementarities. Industrial Relations, Labor Market, and Welfare State Changes in France and Germany’. In Emmenegger, Patrick, Häusermann, Silja, Palier, Bruno and Seeleib-Kaiser, Martin (eds.): The Age of Dualization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 201–225.Google Scholar
Petrocik, John R. (1996). ‘Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections with a 1980 Case Study’. American Journal of Political Science, 40(3), 825–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petty, R E., Briñol, P and Prieser, J. R. (2009). ‘Mass Media Attitude Change: Implications of the Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion’. In Bryant, J. and Oliver, M. B. (eds.): Media Effects: Advanves in Theory and Research. New York: Routledge, pp. 125–164.Google Scholar
Pfetsch, Barbara (2003). Politische Kommunikationskultur, Politische Sprecher und Journalisten in der Bundesrepublik und den USA im Vergleich. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
Pfetsch, Barbara (2004). ‘From Political Culture to Political Communications Culture: A Theoretical Approach to Comparative Analysis’. In Esser, Frank and Pfetsch, Barbara (eds.): Comparing Political Communication. Theories, Cases, and Challenges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 344–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfetsch, Barbara (ed.) (2014). Political Communication Cultures in Europe: Attitudes of Political Actors and Journalists in Nine Countries. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul (1994). Dismantling the Welfare State: Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul (1996). ‘The New Politics of the Welfare State’. World Politics, 48(2), 143–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pontusson, Jonas and Raess, Damian (2012). ‘How (and Why) Is This Time Different? The Politics of Economic Crisis in Western Europe and the United States’. Annual Review of Political Science, 15(1), 13–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porto, Mauro P. (2007). ‘Frame Diversity and Citizen Competence: Towards a Critical Approach to News Quality’. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 24(4), 303–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regini, Marino (2000). ‘Between Deregulation and Social Pacts: The Responses of European Economies to Globalization’. Politics and Society, 28(1), 5–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, Martin (2001). ‘The Political Economy of Social Pacts: Competitive Corporatism and European Welfare Reform’. In Pierson, Paul (ed.): The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 165–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rietig, Katharina (2014). ‘“Neutral” Experts? How Input of Scientific Expertise Matters in International Environmental Negotiations’. Policy Sciences, 47(2), 141–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, William H. (1996). The Strategy of Rhetoric for the American Constitution. New Heaven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rueda, David (2005). ‘Insider–outsider Politics in Industrialized Democracies: The Challenge to Social Democratic Parties’. American Political Science Review, 99(1), 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueda, David (2006). ‘Social Democracy and Active Labour-Market Policies: Insiders, Outsiders and the Politics of Employment Promotion’. British Journal of Political Science, 36(3), 385–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueda, David (2007). Social Democracy Inside Out: Government Partisanship, Insiders, and Outsiders in Industrialized Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabatier, Paul A. (1987). ‘Knowledge, Policy-oriented Learning, and Policy Change: An Advocacy Coalition Framework’. Science Communication, 8(4), 649–692.Google Scholar
Sabatier, Paul A. (1988). ‘An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-oriented Learning Therein’. Policy Sciences, 21(2), 129–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabatier, Paul A. and Jenkins-Smith, Hank C. (1988). ‘Special Issue: Policy Change and Policy-oriented Learning: Exploring an Advocacy Coalition Framework’. Policy Sciences, 21(2), 123–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabatier, Paul A. and Jenkins-Smith, Hank C. (1993). Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
Sabatier, Paul A. and Jenkins-Smith, Hank C. (1999). ‘The Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Assessment’. In Sabatier, Paul A. (ed.): Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder: Westview, pp. 117–166.Google Scholar
Sabatier, Paul A. and Weible, Christopher M. (2007). ‘The Advocacy Coalition Framework: Innovations and Clarifications’. In Sabatier, Paul A. (ed.): Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder: Westview (2nd edition), pp. 189–220.Google Scholar
Sacchi, Stefano, Pancaldi, Stefano and Arisi, Claudia (2011). ‘The Economic Crisis as a Trigger of Convergence? Short-time Work in Italy, Germany and Austria’. Social Policy and Administration, 45(4), 465–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz (1981). The Political Economy of Inflation and Unemployment in Western Europe: An Outline. Berlin: WZB.Google Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz (1984). ‘Economic and Institutional Constraints of Full Employment Strategies: Sweden, Austria, and West Germany, 1973–1982’. In Goldthorpe, John H. (ed.): Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism: Studies in the Political Economy of Western European Nations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 257–290.Google Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz W. (1997). Games Real Actors Play. Actor-centered Institutionalism in Policy Research. Oxford: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz W. (2011). ‘Monetary Union, Fiscal Crisis and the Preemption of Democracy’. Cologne, MPIfG Discussion Paper 11/11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schattschneider, Elmer E. (1975 [1960]). The Semisovereign People: A Realists’ View of Democracy in America. New York: Wadsworth Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
Schlager, Edella (1995). ‘Policy Making and Collective Action: Defining Coalitions Within the Advocacy Coalition Framework’. Policy Sciences, 28(3), 243–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Vivien A. (2008). ‘European Political Economy: Labor Out, State Back in, Firm to the Fore’. West European Politics, 31(1–2), 302–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Vivien A. (2009). ‘Putting the Political Back into Political Economy by Bringing the State Back in Yet Again’. World Politics 61, 3: 516–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger and Farrell, David M. (2002). Studying Political Campaigns and Their Effects. In Farrell, David M. and Beck-Schmitt, Rüdiger (eds.): Do Political Campaigns Matter? Campaign Effects in Elections and Referendums. London: Routledge, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe C. (1982). ‘Reflections on Where the Theory of Corporatism Has Gone and Where the Praxis of Neo-corporatism May Be Going’. In Lehmbruch, Gerhard and Schmitter, Philippe C. (eds.): Patterns of Corporatist Policy-making. London: Sage, pp. 259–290.Google Scholar
Schmitter Philippe, C. and Lehmbruch, Gerhard (eds.) (1979). Trends Toward Corporatist Intermediation. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Schneider, Martin R. and Paunescu, Mihai (2012). Changing Varieties of Capitalism and Revealed Comparative Advantages from 1990 to 2005: A Test of the Hall and Soskice Claims, Socio-economic Review 10(4): 731–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schudson, Michael (2002). ‘The News Media as Political Institutions’. Annual Review of Political Science, 5, 249–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulz, Winfried (1976). Die Konstruktion von Realität in den Nachrichtenmedien. Freiburg/München: Verlag Karl Alber.Google Scholar
Schulz, Winfried (1997). Politische Kommunikation: Theoretische Ansätze und Ergebnisse empirischer Forschung zur Rolle der Massenmedien in der Politik. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwander, Hanna (2012). Social Democratic Parties as Insider-parties? Counter-Evidence from France, Germany, and Great Britain. Paper prepared for the annual Congress of Swiss Political Science Association in Lucerne, Switzerland, 2–3 February 2012.Google Scholar
Seco (2010). Faktenblatt: Warum das Gesetz über die Arbeitslosenversicherung revidiert wird. Bern.Google Scholar
Seco (2011). Wirtschaftliche Lagebeurteilung im Licht des Schweizer Frankens. Bern: Press release published on 14 January 2011.Google Scholar
Seeleib-Kaiser, Martin and Fleckenstein, Timo (2006). Discourse, Learning and Welfare State Change. The Case of German Labour Market Reforms. Working Paper.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, Pamela J. and Reese, Stephen D. (1996). Mediating the Message. Theories of Influences on Mass Media Content. White Plains: Longman Publisher (2nd edition).Google Scholar
Siaroff, Alan (1999). ‘Corporatism on 24 Industrial Democracies: Meaning and Measurement’. European Journal of Political Research, 36(2), 175–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sides, John, Shaw, Daron, Grossmann, Matt and Lipsitz, Keena (2015). Campaigns and Elections: Rules, Reality, Strategy, Choice. New York. W. W. Norton (2nd edition).Google Scholar
Slothuus, Rune (2008). ‘More Than Weighting Cognitive Importance: A Dual Process Model of Issue Framing Effects’. Political Psychology, 29(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slothuus, Rune (2010). ‘When Can Political Parties Lead Public Opinion? Evidence from a Natural Experiment’. Political Communication, 27(2), 158–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M. and Theriault, Sean M. (2004). ‘The Structure of Political Argument and the Logic of Issue Framing’. In Sniderman, Paul M. and Theriault, Sean M. (eds.): Studies in Public Opinion: Attitudes, Nonattitudes, Measurement Error and Change. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 133–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soroka, Stuar N. and Wlezien, Christopher (2010). Degrees of Democracy: Politics, Public Opinion, and Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stiller, Sabina and van Gerven, Minna (2012). ‘The European Employment Strategy and National Core Executives: Impacts on Activation Reforms in the Netherlands and Germany’. Journal of European Social Policy, 22(2), 118–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stimson, James A. (2015). Tides of Consent: How Public Opinion Shapes American Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2nd edition).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stimson, James A, Mackuen, Michael B. and Erikson, Robert S. (1995). ‘Dynamic Representation’. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 543–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang (2009). Re-forming Capitalism: Institutional Change in the German Political Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stroebe, Wolfgang (2007). ‘Strategies of Attitude and Behavior Change’. In Jonas, Klaus, Stroebe, Wolfgang and Hewstone, Miles (eds.): Sozialpsychologie. Berlin: Springer, pp. 225–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strömbäck, Jesper (2005). ‘In Search of a Standard: Four Models of Democracy and Their Normative Implications for Journalism’. Journalism Studies, 6(3), 331–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strömbäck, Jesper (2008). ‘Four Phases of Mediatization: An Analysis of the Mediatization of Politics’. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 3(13), 228–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strömbäck, Jesper and Nord, Lars (2006). ‘Do Politicians Lead the Tango?’ European Journal of Communication, 21(2), 147–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanson, David L. and Mancini, Paolo (1996). Politics, Media, and Modern Democracy. An International Study of Innovations in Electoral Campaigning and Their Consequences. London: Praeger.Google Scholar
Swenson, Peter (1991). ‘Bringing Capital Back in, or Social Democracy Reconsidered: Employer Power, Cross Class Alliances and Centralization of Industrial Relations in Denmark and Sweden’. World Politics, 43(3), 513–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szarka, Joseph (2010). ‘Bringing Interests Back in: Using Coalition Theories to Explain European Wind Power Policies’. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(6), 836–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney (2008). ‘Charles Tilly and the Practice of Contentious Politics’. Social Movement Studies, 7(3), 225–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, Peter (2005). ‘New Risks and Social Change’. In Taylor-Gooby, Peter (ed): New Risks, New Welfare. The Transformation of the European Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, Peter and Larsen, Trine P. (2005). ‘The UK – A Test Case for the Liberal Welfare State?’. In Taylor-Gooby, Peter (ed): New Risks, New Welfare. The Transformation of the European Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 57–82.Google Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, Peter and Stoker, Gerry (2011). ‘The Coalition Programme: A New Vision for Britain or Politics as Usual?’. The Political Quarterly, 82(1), 4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, Peter (2012). ‘Root and Branch Restructuring to Achieve Major Cuts: The Social Policy Programme of the 2010 UK Coalition Government’. Social Policy and Administration, 46(1), 61–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tewksbury, David, Jennifer Jones, Matthew W. Peske, Ashlea Raymond and Vig, William (2000). ‘The Interaction of News and Advocate Frames: Manipulating Audience Perceptions of a Local Public Policy Issue’. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(4), 804–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen (2001). ‘Varieties of Labor Politics in the Developed Democracies’. In Hall, Peter A. and Soskice, David (eds): Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen (2012). ‘Varieties of Capitalism: Trajectories of Liberalization and the New Politics of Social Solidarity’. Annual Review of Political Science, 15, 2.1–2.23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen and van Wijnbergen, Christa (2003). ‘The Paradox of Globalization: Labor Relations in Germany and Beyond’. Comparative Political Studies, 36(8), 859–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Therborn, Göran (1986). Why Some Peoples Are More Unemployed Than Others. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles (1995). Popular Contention in Great Britain, 1758–1834. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles (2008). Contentious Performances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torfing, Jacob (1999). ‘Towards a Schumpeterian Workfare Post National Regime: Path-shaping and Path-dependency in Danish Welfare State Reform’. Economy and Society, 28(3), 369–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treu, Tiziano (1994). ‘Procedures and Institutions of Incomes Policy in Italy’. In Dore, Ronald, Boyer, Robert and Mars, Zoe (eds.): The Return of Income Policy. London: Printer, pp. 161–174.Google Scholar
Trickey, Heather and Walker, Robert (2001). ‘Steps to Compulsion Within British Labour Market Policies’. In Lødemel, Ivar and Trickey, Heather (eds.): ‘An Offer You Can’t Refuse’. Workfare in International Perspective. Bristol: The Policy Press, pp. 181–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
True, James L., Jones, Bryan D. and Baumgartner, Frank R. (2007). ‘Punctuated-Equilibrium Theory: Explaining Stability and Change in Public Policymaking’. In Sabatier, Paul A. (ed.): Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder: Westview (2nd edition), pp. 155–187.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, George (2002). Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valkenburg, Patti M., Semetko, Holli A. and de Vreese, Claes H. (1999). ‘The Effects of News Frames on Readers Thoughts and Recall’. Communication Research, 26(5), 550–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vergeer, Maurice, Hermans, Liesbeth and Sams, Steven (2011). ‘Online Social Networks and Micro-blogging in Political Campaigning: The Exploration of a New Campaign Tool and a New Campaign Style’. Party Politics, 30(1), 1–25.Google Scholar
van Dalen, Arjen (2012). ‘Structural Bias in Cross-national Perspective: How Political Systems and Journalism Cultures Influence Government Dominance in the News’. International Journal of Press/Politics, 17(1), 32–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dalen, Arjen, de Vreese, Claes and Albæk, Erik (2012). ‘Different Roles, Different Content? A Four-country Comparison of the Conceptions and Reporting Style of Political Journalists’. Journalism, 13(7), 901–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Meer, Tom W. Annemarie Walter, G. and van Aelst, Peter (2016). ‘The Contingency of Voter Learning: How Election Debates Influenced Voters’ Ability and Accuracy to Position Parties in the 2010 Dutch Election Campaign’. Political Communication, 33(1), 136–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Wurff, Richard (2011). ‘Do Audiences Receive Diverse Ideas From News Media? Exposure to a Variety of News Media and Personal Characteristics as Determinants of Diversity as Received’. European Journal of Communication, 26(4), 328–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vliegenthart, Rens and van Zoonen, Liesbet (2011). ‘Power to the Frame: Bringing Sociology Back to Frame Analysis’. European Journal of Communication, 26(1), 101–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voakes, Paul S., Kapfer, Jack, Kurpius, David and David Shano-Yeon Chern (1996). ‘Diversity in the News: A Conceptual and Methodological Framework’. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 73 (3), 582–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walgrave, Stefan and Manssens, Jan (2000). The Making of the White March: The Mass Media as a Mobilizing Alternative to Movement Organizations, Mobilization 5(2), 217–39.Google Scholar
Walgrave, Stefaan and van Aelst, Peter (2006). ‘The Contingency of the Mass Media’s Political Agenda Setting Power: Toward a Preliminary Theory’. Journalism of Communication, 56(1), 88–109.Google Scholar
Ward, Stephen and Gibson, Rachel (2009). ‘European Political Organizations and the Internet: Mobilization, Participation, and Change’. In Chadwick, Andrew and Howard, Philip N. (eds.): Handbook of Internet Politics. New York: Routledge, pp. 25–39.Google Scholar
Wassermann, Stanley and Faust, Katherine (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, Roland (2010). ‘Benefits: Three Strikes and You’re Out’. The Times. 11th November.Google Scholar
Wessler, Hartumt (2008). ‘Investigating Deliberativeness Comparatively’. Political Communication, 25(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wien, Charlotte and Elmelund-Præstekær, Christian (2009). ‘An Anatomy of Media-Hypes: Developing a Model for the Dynamics and Structure of Intense Media Coverage of Single Issues’. European Journal of Communication, 24(2), 183–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woldendorp, Jaap (2011). Corporatism in Small North-West European Countries 1970–2006: Business as Usual, Decline, or a New Phenomenon. Amsterdam: Working Paper.Google Scholar
Wolfsfeld, Gadi (1997). Media and Political Conflict. News from the Middle East. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wolfsfeld, Gadi and Scheafer, Tamir (2006). ‘Competing Actors and the Construction of Political News: The Contest over Waves in Israel’. Political Communication, 23(3), 333–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, John R. 1992). The Nature and Origin of Public Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Weiyu, Cao, Xiaoxia and Tram, Minh Ngok (2013). ‘The Structural Features and the Deliberative Quality of Online Discussions’. Telematic and Informatics, 30(2), 74–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar