Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 54
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Röber, Björn 2018. Escalation of Commitment in Internationalization Processes. p. 11.

    Kene, Prachi Yee, Elena T. and Gimmestad, Katherine D. 2018. Suicide assessment and treatment: Gaps between theory, research, and practice. Death Studies, p. 1.

    Gräfe, Gernot and Maaß, Christian 2018. Daten- und Informationsqualität. p. 169.

    Groux, Gaëlle M. N. Hoffman, Steven J. and Ottersen, Trygve 2018. A Typology of Scientific Advisory Committees. Global Challenges, Vol. 2, Issue. 9, p. 1800004.

    Placì, Sarah Eckert, Johanna Rakoczy, Hannes and Fischer, Julia 2018. Long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis) can use simple heuristics but fail at drawing statistical inferences from populations to samples. Royal Society Open Science, Vol. 5, Issue. 9, p. 181025.

    Drury-Grogan, Meghann L. 2017. The International Encyclopedia of Organizational Communication. p. 1.

    Haugen, Stein and Edwin, Nathaniel John 2017. Dynamic risk analysis for operational decision support. EURO Journal on Decision Processes, Vol. 5, Issue. 1-4, p. 41.

    Hillen, Marij A. Gutheil, Caitlin M. Strout, Tania D. Smets, Ellen M.A. and Han, Paul K.J. 2017. Tolerance of uncertainty: Conceptual analysis, integrative model, and implications for healthcare. Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 180, Issue. , p. 62.

    Pfohl, Hans-Christian Berbner, Ulrich and Zuber, Christian 2017. Dynamic and Seamless Integration of Production, Logistics and Traffic. p. 13.

    Yeboah Banin, Abena Boso, Nathaniel Hultman, Magnus Souchon, Anne L. Hughes, Paul and Nemkova, Ekaterina 2016. Salesperson improvisation: Antecedents, performance outcomes, and boundary conditions. Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 59, Issue. , p. 120.

    Robert, Sebastian Büttner, Sebastian Röcker, Carsten and Holzinger, Andreas 2016. Machine Learning for Health Informatics. Vol. 9605, Issue. , p. 357.

    Donegan, H. A. 2016. SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering. p. 3048.

    Kasemsap, Kijpokin 2015. Handbook of Research on Behavioral Finance and Investment Strategies. p. 94.

    Saad, Gad 2015. Wiley Encyclopedia of Management. p. 1.

    Kabil, Ahmad and Kabeil, Magdy M. 2014. Crisis Management. p. 993.

    Song, Anna V. Brown, Paul and Glantz, Stanton A. 2014. When Health Policy and Empirical Evidence Collide: The Case of Cigarette Package Warning Labels and Economic Consumer Surplus. American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 104, Issue. 2, p. e42.

    Mohammed, Emad A Far, Behrouz H and Naugler, Christopher 2014. Applications of the MapReduce programming framework to clinical big data analysis: current landscape and future trends. BioData Mining, Vol. 7, Issue. 1,

    Rapaport, Sivan Leshno, Moshe and Fink, Lior 2014. A design process for using normative models in shared decision making: a case study in the context of prenatal testing. Health Expectations, Vol. 17, Issue. 6, p. 863.

    Helfenstein, Sacha Kaikova, Olena Khriyenko, Oleksiy and Terziyan, Vagan 2014. Emotional Business Intelligence. p. 14.

    Figueira, José Rui Greco, Salvatore Roy, Bernard and Słowiński, Roman 2013. An Overview of ELECTRE Methods and their Recent Extensions. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, Vol. 20, Issue. 1-2, p. 61.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 1988
  • Online publication date: March 2011

1 - DESCRIPTIVE, NORMATIVE, AND PRESCRIPTIVE INTERACTIONS IN DECISION MAKING

Summary

The focus of our attention is the individual decision maker facing a choice involving uncertainty about outcomes. We will consider how people do make decisions, how “rational” people should make decisions, and how we might help less rational people, who nevertheless aspire to rationality, to do better. When we speak of nonrational people, we do not mean those with diminished capacities; we refer instead to normal people who have not given thought to the process of decision making or, even if they have, are unable, cognitively, to implement the desired process. Our decision makers are not economic automatons; they make mistakes, have remorse, suffer anxieties, and cannot make up their minds. We start with a premise, not that people have well thought out preferences, but that they may be viewed as having divided minds with different aspirations, that decision making, even for the individual, is an act of compromise among the different selves.

For our purposes we shall augment the usual dichotomy that distinguishes between the normative and descriptive sides (the “ought” and the “is”) of decision making, by adding a third component: the prescriptive side. We do this because much of our concern in this paper addresses the question: “How can real people – as opposed to imaginary, idealized, super-rational people without psyches – make better choices in a way that does not do violence to their deep cognitive concerns?” And we find that much that we have to say on these matters does not fit conveniently into the usual normative or descriptive niches.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Decision Making
  • Online ISBN: 9780511598951
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511598951
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×