Abelshauser, W., Fisch, S. & Hoffmann, D. (2016). Wirtschaftspolitik in Deutschland 1917–1990. Oldenburg: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aberbach, J. D., Putnam, R. D. & Rockman, B. A. (1981). Bureaucrats and Politicians in Western Europe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aberbach, J. & Rockman, B. (2000). In the Web of Politics: Three Decades of the US Federal Executive. Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar

Abutaleb, Y. & McGinley, L. (2020). Ousted Vaccine Official Alleges he was Demoted for Prioritizing “Science and Safety,” Washington Post, May 5.Google Scholar

Agerberg, M. (2017). Failed Expectations: Quality of Government and Support for Populist Parties in Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 56(3), 578–600. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12203CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aguilar Camín, H. (2018). A las puertas de AMLO, Nexos, June, 31–39.Google Scholar

Aguilar Camín, H. (2019). La destrucción transformadora, Milenio, July 8.Google Scholar

Ahmed, A. & Villegas, P. (2018). López Obrador, an Atypical Leftist, Wins Mexico Presidency in Landslide, The New York Times, July 1.Google Scholar

Ajuntament de Barcelona. (2016). Open & Agile Digital Transformation Toolkit. Available from https://ajuntament.barcelona.cat/digital/en/digital-transformation/technology-for-a-better-government/transformation-with-agile-methodologyGoogle Scholar

Albertazzi, D. & McDonnell, D. (2005). The Lega Nord in the Second Berlusconi Government: In a League of its Own. West European Politics, 28(5), 952–72.Google Scholar

Albertazzi, D. & McDonnell, D. (2008). Twenty-First Century Populism: The Spectre of Western European Democracy. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Albertazzi, D. & McDonnell, D. (2015). Populists in Power. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Alford, J., Hartley, J., Yates, S. & Hughes, O. (2017). Into the Purple Zone. Deconstructing the Politics/Administration Distinction. The American Review of Public Administration, 47(7), 752–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amorim Neto, O. & Pimenta, G. A. (2020). The First Year of Bolsonaro in Office: Same Old Story, Same Old Song? Revista de Ciencia Política, 40(2), 187–213.Google Scholar

Andersen, L. B., Heinesen, E. & Pedersen, L. H. (2014). How Does Public Service Motivation Among Teachers Affect Student Performance in Schools? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(3), 651–71.Google Scholar

Animal Político. (2018). Equipo de AMLO presume que programas obtuvieron más del 90% de aceptación; Tren Maya, el menos votado. Animal Político, 26 November.Google Scholar

Animal Político. (2019). Gobierno compra 571 pipas por 85 mdd; AMLO garantiza que se estabilizará abasto de gasolina. Animal Político, January 21.Google Scholar

Anonymous. (2019). A Warning. New York, NY: Twelve Books.Google Scholar

Arellano, S. & Mercado, A. (2019). Gertz Manero, fiscal general por 9 años. Milenio, January 19.Google Scholar

Arena Pública. (2019). Advierte Cofece “potencial daño permanente” por adjudicación directa a Banco Azteca. Arena Pública, January 24.Google Scholar

Arenas, N. (2010). La Venezuela de Hugo Chávez: rentismo, populismo y democracia. Nueva Sociedad, 229, 76–93.Google Scholar

Arias, L., Barrientos, E., Fócil, M., et al. (2018). Análisis de los Lineamientos de Combate a la Corrupción y Aplicación de una Política de Austeridad Republicana en materia de recorte de plazas, reducción de salarios, cancelación de prestaciones y aumento de la jornada laboral al personal de confianza. Nexos, September.Google Scholar

Arnsdorf, I. (2018). The Shadow Rulers of the VA. ProPublicia, August 7. Available from www.propublica.org/article/ike-perlmutter-bruce-moskowitz-marc-sherman-shadow-rulers-of-the-vaGoogle Scholar

Atkinson, M. M. & Coleman, W. D. (1989). Strong States and Weak States: Sectoral Policy Networks in Advanced Capitalist Economies. British Journal of Political Science, 19(1), 47–67.Google Scholar

Avelar, I. (2017). A Response to Fabian Santos and Fernando Guarnieri. Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies, 26(2), 341–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Babiš, A. (2016). O Čem Sním Když Náhodou Spím. Prague. Available from www.anobudelip.cz/file/edee/2017/o-cem-snim-kdyz-nahodou-spim.pdfGoogle Scholar

Bach, M. (1990). Die charismatischen Führerdiktaturen. Drittes Reich und italienischer Faschismus im Vergleich ihrer Herrschaftsstrukturen. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar

Bach, M. & Breuer, S. (2010). Faschismus als Bewegung und Regime. Italien und Deutschland im Vergleich. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.Google Scholar

Badell, D., Di Mascio, F., Natalini, A., Ongaro, E., Stolfi, F. & Ysa, T. (2019). Too Big to Fail? The Dynamics of EU Influence and Fiscal Consolidation in Italy and Spain (2008–2016). Public Management Review, 21(9), 1307–29.Google Scholar

Baker, R. (2002). Transitions from Authoritarianism. The Role of the Bureaucracy. Westport, CA: Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar

Banfield, E. (1958). The Moral Basis of a Backward Society. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar

Barr, W. (2018). Mueller’s “Obstruction” Theory. Internal Department of Justice memo, June 8. Available from https://int.nyt.com/data/documenthelper/549-june-2018-barr-memo-to-doj-mue/b4c05e39318dd2d136b3/optimized/full.pdfGoogle Scholar

Bartha, A., Boda, Z. & Szikra, D. (2020). When Populist Leaders Govern: Conceptualizing Politics and Governance. Politics and Governance, 8(3), 71–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bason, C. (2018). Leading Public Sector Innovation. Co-SCreating for a Better Society, 2nd ed., Bristol: Policy PressGoogle Scholar

Batory, A. (2016). Populists in Government? Hungary’s “System of National Cooperation.” Democratization, 23(2), 283–303.Google Scholar

Batory, A. & Svensson, S. (2019). The Use and Abuse of Participatory Governance by Populist Governments. Policy & Politics, 47(2), 227–44.Google Scholar

Bauer, M. W. & Becker, S. (2020). Democratic Backsliding, Populism and Public Administration. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 3(1), 19–31.Google Scholar

Bauer, M. W. & Ege, J. (2016). Bureaucratic Autonomy of International Organizations’ Secretariats. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(7), 1019–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Becker, A. (2017). The Circulation of Oligarchs. In Magyar, B. & Vásárhelyi, J., eds., Twenty-Five Sides of a Post-Communist Mafia State. Budapest: Central European University Press, pp. 111–27.Google Scholar

Bekke, H. A. G. M., Perry, J. L. & Toonen, T. A. J. (eds.) (1996). Civil Service Systems in Comparative Perspective. Bloomington & Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Bellé, N. (2012). Experimental Evidence on the Relationship between Public Service Motivation and Job Performance. Public Administration Review, 73(1), 143–53.Google Scholar

Bermeo, N. (2016). On Democratic Backsliding. Journal of Democracy, 27(1), 5–19.Google Scholar

Bertelli, A. & Feldmann, S. (2007). Strategic Appointments. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(1), 19–38.Google Scholar

Bertrand, N. (2019). Peter Strzok Accuses the Federal Government of Violating his Rights. Politico, December 30. Available from: www.politico.com/news/2019/12/30/peter-strzok-accuses-government-violating-his-rights-091156Google Scholar

Bickerton, C. & Invernizzi Accetti, C. (2017). Populism and Technocracy: Opposites or Complements? Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 20(2), 186–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2014.995504Google Scholar

Bickerton, C. & Invernizzi Accetti, C. (2018). Techno-Populism as a New Party Family: The Case of the Five Star Movement and Podemos. Contemporary Italian Politics, 10(2), 132–50.Google Scholar

Black, T. (2018). Now They are Blaming Populists for Measles. Spiked, August 27. Available from www.spiked-online.com/2018/08/27/now-theyre-blaming-populism-for-measles/#.W5E05LgnaUkGoogle Scholar

Blake, A. (2020). Trump’s Government Full of Temps. Washington Post, February 21.Google Scholar

Blanchar, C. (2017). Colau crea 2.000 plazas de funcionario para reducir un 70% los interinos. El País, December 14. Available from https://elpais.com/ccaa/2017/12/14/catalunya/1513254236_344383.htmlGoogle Scholar

Blanco, I., Salazar, Y. & Bianchi, I. (2019). Urban Governance and Political Change under a Radical Left Government: The Case of Barcelona. Journal of Urban Affairs, 42(1), 18–38.Google Scholar

Bloom, P. & Sancino, A. (2019). Disruptive Democracy: The Clash Between Techno-Populism and Techno-Democracy. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google Scholar

Bloomberg. (2016). Venezuela’s Military Needs to Get Out of Business. Generals and Soldiers are Profiting from a Dysfunctional Economy. Bloomberg, May 6. Available from www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2016-05-06/venezuela-s-military-needs-to-get-out-of-businessGoogle Scholar

Bobbio, N. (1987). The Future of Democracy: A Defence of the Rules of the Game. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Boin, A., Stern, E. & Sundelius, B. (2016). The Politics of Crisis Management: Public Leadership Under Pressure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Boräng, F., Cornell, A., Grimes, M. & Schuster, C. (2018). Cooking the Books: Bureaucratic Politicization and Policy Knowledge. Governance, 31(1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12283CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bordignon, F. & Ceccarini, L. (2013). Five Stars and a Cricket. Beppe Grillo Shakes Italian Politics. South European Society and Politics, 18(4), 427–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2013.775720Google Scholar

Borgonovi, E. & Ongaro, E. (2011). The Civil Service in Italy. In Massey, A., ed., The International Handbook of Civil Service Systems. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 103–24.Google Scholar

Borins, S. (2018). Public Sector Innovation in a Context of Radical Populism. Public Management Review, 20(12), 1858–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1441430Google Scholar

Boswell, C. (2008). The Political Functions of Expert Knowledge: Knowledge and Legitimation in European Union Immigration Policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 15(4), 471–88.Google Scholar

Boswell, C. (2018). Manufacturing Political Trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bovaird, T. (2007). Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Coproduction of Public Services. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 846–60.Google Scholar

Bozóki, A. (2011). Occupy the State: The Orbán Regime in Hungary. Debate: Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe, 19(3), 649–63.Google Scholar

Bozóki, A. (2015). Broken Democracy, Predatory State, and Nationalist Populism. In Krastev, P. & van Till, J., eds., The Hungarian Patient: Social Opposition to an Illiberal Democracy. Budapest: Central European University Press, pp. 3–36.Google Scholar

Bracher, K. D. (1983). Nationalsozialistische Diktatur 1933–1945. Eine Bilanz. Düsseldorf: Droste (Bonner Schriften zur Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 21).Google Scholar

Bracher, K. D., Sauer, W. & Schulz, G. (1962). Die nationalsozialistische Machtergreifung. Studien zur Errichtung des totalitären Herrschaftssystems in Deutschland 1933/34, 2nd ed. Cologne: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar

Brannen, K. (2020). Unredacted Ukraine Documents Reveal Extent of Pentagon’s Legal Concerns. Just Security, January 2. Available from www.justsecurity.org/67863/exclusive-unredacted-ukraine-documents-reveal-extent-of-pentagons-legal-concerns/Google Scholar

Bratton, M. & van de Walle, N. (1997). Democratic Experiments in Africa. Regime Transitions in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bravo, C. (2019). El hampa del periodismo. Letras Libres, September.Google Scholar

Brehm, J. & Gates, S. (1997). Working, Shirking, and Sabotage: Bureaucratic Response to a Democratic Public. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Brehm, J. & Gates, S. (2002). Working, Shirking, and Sabotage. Bureaucratic Response to a Democratic Public, 4th ed. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.Google Scholar

Briceño, H. (2017). La diversidad ideológica en la formación de las políticas públicas durante el chavismo. In Spiritto, F., ed., Decisiones de gobierno en Venezuela. Apuntes para su comprensión histórica y de políticas públicas. Caracas: Publicaciones Universidad Católica Andrés Bello, pp. 115–36.Google Scholar

Bruhn, K. (2013). To Hell with your Corrupt institutions! AMLO and Populism in Mexico. In Mudde, C. & Rovira, C., eds., Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat Or Corrective for Democracy? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 88–112.Google Scholar

Brunsson, N. (1989). The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talks, Decisions, and Actions in Organizations. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar

Buchheim, C. (2008). Das NS-Regime und die Überwindung der Weltwirtschaftskrise in Deutschland. Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte, 56(3), 381–414.Google Scholar

Burchardt, H.-J. (2005). Das soziale Elend des Hugo Chávez: Die Wirtschafts- und Sozialpolitik der Fünften Republik. In Diehl, O. & Muno, W., eds., Venezuela unter Chávez – Aufbruch oder Niedergang? Frankfurt: Vervuert, pp. 99–126.Google Scholar

Burnett, C. M. & Kogan, V. (2016). The Politics of Potholes: Service Quality and Retrospective Voting in Local Elections. The Journal of Politics, 79(1), 203–14.Google Scholar

Buštíková, L. & Guasti, P. (2018). The State as a Firm: Understanding the Autocratic Roots of Technocratic Populism. East European Politics and Societies, 33(2), 302–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325418791723.Google Scholar

Cairney, P. (2016). The Politics of Evidence-Based Policymaking. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Calzada, I. (2018). (Smart) Citizens from Data Providers to Decision-Makers? The Case Study of Barcelona. Sustainability, 10(9), 32–52. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093252Google Scholar

Camarena, S. (2018). Rocío Nahle vs. la CNH y la CRE. El Financiero, November 14.Google Scholar

Camarotti, G. (2020). Carta aberta com crítica a Aras é lida em reunião de conselho do MP; procurador-geral reage. G1. Available from https://g1.globo.com/politica/blog/gerson-camarotti/post/2020/07/31/carta-aberta-de-procuradores-com-criticas-a-aras-e-lida-em-reuniao-do-conselho-superior-do-mp.ghtmlGoogle Scholar

Canova, A., Herrera Orellana, L., Rodríguez Ortega, R. & Graterol Stefanelli, G. (2014). El TSJ al servicio de la Revolución. La toma, los números y los criterios del TSJ venezolano (2004–2013). Caracas: Editorial Galipán.Google Scholar

Canovan, M. (1999). Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy. Political Studies, 47(1), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00184Google Scholar

Capano, G. (2003). Administrative Traditions and Policy Change: When Policy Paradigms Matter. The Case of Italian Administrative Reform During the 1990s. Public Administration, 81(4), 781–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caplan, J. (1988). Government Without Administration. State and Civil Service in Weimar and Nazi Germany. Oxford: Clarendon Press of Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Caramani, D. (2017). Will vs. Reason: The Populist and Technocratic Forms of Political Representation and Their Critique to Party Government. American Political Science Review, 111(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000538Google Scholar

Cardullo, P. & Kitchin, R. (2019). Being a “Citizen” in the Smart City: Up and Down the Scaffold of Smart Citizen Particition. GeoJournal, 84, 1–13.Google Scholar

Carpenter, D. P. (2001). The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy: Reputations, Networks, and Policy Innovation in Executive Agencies, 1862–1928. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Casal, J. (2001). El constitucionalismo venezolano y la Constitución de 1999. Revista de la Facultad de Derecho UCAB, 56, 137–80.Google Scholar

Casar, M. A. (2019a). El gran benefactor. Nexos, March.Google Scholar

Casar, M. A. (2019b). Estado y gobierno: ¿la disminución? Nexos, September.Google Scholar

Cassese, S. (1993). Hypotheses on the Italian Administrative System. West European Politics, 16(3), 316–28.Google Scholar

Cassese, S. (1999). Italy’s Senior Civil Service: An Ossified World. In Page, E.C. & Wright, V., eds., Bureaucratic Elites in Western European States. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 55–64.Google Scholar

Cejudo, G. M. (2017). Policy Analysis in the Mexican Federal Government. In Méndez, J. L. & Dussauge-Laguna, M. I., eds., Policy Analysis in Mexico, Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 31–44.Google Scholar

Cejudo, G. M. & Gómez-Álvarez, D. (2018). La austeridad y la podadora. Nexos, September 1.Google Scholar

Chaguaceda, A. (2019). México: contexto y antecedentes de la cuarta transformación. Diálogo Político, June 21.Google Scholar

Chandler, R. C. (1983). The Problem of Moral Reasoning in American Public Administration: The Case for a Code of Ethics. Public Administration Review, 43(1), 32–9.Google Scholar

Cheney, K., Betrand, N. & McGraw, M. (2020). Impeachment Witnesses Ousted Amid Fears of Trump Revenge Campaign. Politico, February 7. Available from www.politico.com/news/2020/02/07/donald-trump-pressure-impeachment-witness-alexander-vindman-111997Google Scholar

Christensen, J. (2017). The Power of Economists within the State. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Chwalisz, C. (2015). The Populist Signal. London: Policy Network.Google Scholar

Chwalisz, C. (2017). The People’s Verdict. London: Rowan & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Císař, O. & Štětka, V. (2016). Czech Republic. The Rise of Populism from the Fringes to the Mainstream. In Aalberg, T., Reinemann, C., Esser, F., Stromback, J., & De Vreese, C., eds., Populist Political Communication in Europe. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 285–99.Google Scholar

Civil Service Act. (2015). Ustawa z dnia 30 grudnia 2015 r. o zmianie ustawy o służbie cywilnej oraz niektórych innych ustaw (Dz.U. 2016, poz. 34).Google Scholar

Clark, Charles. (2017). Deconstructing the Deep State. Government Executive, September 17. Available www.govexec.com/feature/gov-exec-deconstructing-deep-state/Google Scholar

Clarke, H. D., Sanders, D., Stewart, M. C. & Whiteley, P. (2004). Political Choice in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Clarke, H. D., Sanders, D., Stewart, M. C. & Whiteley, P. (2009). Performance Politics and the British Voter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Clarke, N., Jennings, W., Moss, J. & Stoker, G. (2018). The Good Politician. Folk Theories, Political Interaction, and the Rise of Anti-Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cohen, Zachary. (2020). Whistleblower accuses Trump Appointees of Downplaying Russian Interference and White Supremacist Threat. CNN, September 9. Available from: www.cnn.com/2020/09/09/politics/dhs-whistleblower-white-supremacist-threat/index.htmlGoogle Scholar

Collier, D. (1979). Overview of the Bureaucratic-Authoritarian Model. In Collier, D., ed., The new authoritarianism in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 19–32.Google Scholar

Conze, E., Frei, N., Hayes, P., Zimmermann, M. & Weinke, A. (2010). Das Amt und die Vergangenheit: Deutsche Diplomaten im Dritten Reich und in der Bundesrepublik, 4th ed. Munich: Blessing.Google Scholar

Cook, B. (2020). Restraining the Unitary Executive: A Regime Ethics Basis for Administrator Defiance of Presidential Directives. Public Integrity, 22(4), 305–15.Google Scholar

Coppedge, M., Gerring, J., Knutsen, C. H., et al. (2018). V-Dem Codebook v8. Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. University of Gothenburg.Google Scholar

Corbin, J. M. & Strauss, A. L. (2015). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 4th ed. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar

Cordiplan. (1990). El Gran Viraje: Lineamientos generales del VIII Plan de la Nación, Presentación al Congreso Nacional. Caracas.Google Scholar

Cornell, A., Knutsen, C. & Teorell, J. (2020). Bureaucracy and Growth. Comparative Political Studies, online first. Available from https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414020912262Google Scholar

Cornwall, A. (2008). Unpacking “Participation” Models, Meanings and Practices. Community Development Journal, 43(3), 269–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsn010Google Scholar

Corrales, J. (2020a). Democratic Backsliding through Electoral Irregularities: The Case of Venezuela. European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies, 109, 41–65.Google Scholar

Corrales, J. (2020b). Authoritarian Survival: Why Maduro Hasn’t Fallen. Journal of Democracy, 31(3), 39–53.Google Scholar

Corrales, J. & Penfold, M. (2011). Dragon in the Tropics. Hugo Chávez and the Political Economy of Revolution in Venezuela. Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar

Cortés, N. & Soto, E. (2019). Eliminan al primer órgano autónomo. El Heraldo de México. March 15.Google Scholar

Costa Pinto, A. (2004). Fascist Era Elites (3). Salazar’s Ministerial Elite, 1933–44. Portuguese Journal of Social Science, 3(2), 103–14.Google Scholar

Cruz, J. (2018). El “error de Texcoco” puede marcar a AMLO. Proceso, November 5.Google Scholar

ČTK. (2015). Radní schválili změny na magistrátu. Bude se i propouštět. Pražský deník, March 17. Available from https://prazsky.denik.cz/zpravy_region/radni-schvalili-zmeny-na-magistratu-bude-se-i-propoustet-20150317.htmlGoogle Scholar

ČTK. (2016). Krnáčová je v čele Prahy dva roky, nyní řeší metropolitní plán. Pražský deník, November 25. Available from https://prazsky.denik.cz/zpravy_region/krnacova-je-v-cele-prahy-dva-roky-nyni-resi-metropolitni-plan-20161125.htmlGoogle Scholar

Cultura Colectiva (2019). Think Tanks y las otras polémicas de Notimex, la agencia oficial del gobierno de AMLO. CC News, May 20.Google Scholar

D’Albergo, L. (2019). Campidoglio, la giunta Raggi vara il rimpasto: fuori Baldassarre, Marzano, Castiglione e Gatta. E apre al Pd. Repubblica.It, September 23. https://roma.repubblica.it/cronaca/2019/09/23/news/campidoglio_la_giunta_raggi_vara_il_rimpasto_fuori_baldassarre_marzano_castiglione_e_gatta-236729404/Google Scholar

D’Elia, Y. & Cabezas, L. (2008). Las Misiones Sociales en Venezuela. Caracas: ILDIS.Google Scholar

Dahl, R. (1961). Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Dahlström, C., Lapuente, V., & Teorell, J. (2012). The Merit of Meritocratization: Politics, Bureaucracy, and the Institutional Deterrents of Corruption. Political Research Quarterly, 65(3), 656–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dalton, R. J. (1984). Cognitive Mobilisation and Partisan Dealignment in Advanced Industrial Democracies, Journal of Politics, 46(1), 264–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davies, H., Nutley, S. & Smith, P. (eds.) (2000). What Works? Evidence-based Policy and Practice in Public Services. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar

Dawsey, J. (2020). In Speech, Mulvaney Says Republicans Are Hypocritical on Deficits. Washington Post, February 19.Google Scholar

De la Torre, C. (2017). Populism in Latin America. In Rovira-Kaltwasser, C., Taggart, P. A., Ochoa, P., & Ostiguy, P., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 195–213.Google Scholar

De la Torre, C. & Ortiz Lemos, A. (2016). Populist Polarization and the Slow Death of Democracy in Ecuador. Democratization, 23(2), 221–41.Google Scholar

De la Rosa, R. & Quattromani, D. (2019). Ruling Rome with Five Stars. Contemporary Italian Politics, 11(1), 43–62.Google Scholar

Della Porta, D. & Vannucci, A. (2007). Corruption and Anti-corruption: The Political Defeat of “Clean Hands” in Italy. West European Politics, 30(4), 830–53.Google Scholar

Denhardt, R. B. & Denhardt, J. V. (2002). The New Public Service: Serving Rather than Steering. Public Administration Review, 60(6), 549–59.Google Scholar

Denhardt, R. B. & Perkins, J. (1976). The Coming of Death of Administrative Man. Public Administration Review, 36(4), 379–84.Google Scholar

Diamant, A. (1968). Tradition and Innovation in French Administration. Comparative Political Studies, 1(2), 251–74.Google Scholar

Diamond, D. (2020a). Trump Officials Interfered with CDC Reports on COVID-19. Politico, September 11. Available from www.politico.com/news/2020/09/11/exclusive-trump-officials-interfered-with-cdc-reports-on-covid-19-412809Google Scholar

Diamond, D. (2020b). Trump Administration Shakes up HHS Personnel Office after Tumultuous Hires. Politico, September 21. www.politico.com/news/2020/09/21/trump-administration-hhs-personnel-shake-up-419519Google Scholar

Diamond, L. (2016). Democracy in Decline: How Washington Can Reverse the Tide. Foreign Affairs, 95(4), 151.Google Scholar

Di Mascio, F. (2014). Exploring the Link Between Patronage and Party Institutionalization: An Historical-Institutional Analysis of the Italian Transition. Democratization, 21(4), 678–98.Google Scholar

Di Mascio, F., Feltrin, P. & Natalini, A. (2019). I sindacati del settore pubblico e la riforma Madia della pubblica amministrazione. Rivista Italiana di Politiche Pubbliche, 14(2), 213–46.Google Scholar

Di Mascio, F., Galli, D., Natalini, A., Ongaro, E. & Stolfi, F. (2017). Learning-shaping Crises: A Longitudinal Comparison of Public Personnel Reforms in Italy, 1992–2014. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 19(2), 119–38.Google Scholar

Di Mascio, F., Maggetti, M. & Natalini, A. (2018). Exploring the Dynamics of Delegation Over Time: Insights from Italian Anticorruption Agencies (2003–2016). Policy Studies Journal, 48(2), 367–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12253Google Scholar

Di Mascio, F. & Natalini, A. (2014). Austerity and Public Administration: Italy between Modernization and Spending Cuts. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(12), 1634–56.Google Scholar

Di Mascio, F. & Natalini, A. (2015). Fiscal Retrenchment in Southern Europe: Changing Patterns of Public Management in Greece, Italy, Portugal, and Spain. Public Management Review, 17(1), 129–48.Google Scholar

Di Mascio, F. & Natalini, A. (2016). Ministerial Advisers Between Political Change and Institutional Legacy: The Case of Italy. Acta Politica, 51(4), 517–38.Google Scholar

Di Mascio, F., Natalini, A. & Cacciatore, F. (2019). The Political Origins of Transparency Reforms: Insights from the Italian Case. Italian Political Science Review, 49(3), 211–27.Google Scholar

Di Mascio, F., Natalini, A., Ongaro, E. & Stolfi, F. (2019). Influence of the European Semester on National Public Sector Reforms under Conditions of Fiscal Consolidation: The Policy of Conditionality in Italy 2011–2015. Public Policy and Administration, 35(2), 201–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076718814892Google Scholar

Di Mascio, F., Natalini, A. & Stolfi, F. (2013). The Ghost of Crises Past: Analyzing Reform Sequences to Understand Italy’s Response to the Global Crisis. Public Administration, 91(1), 17–31.Google Scholar

Di Palma, G. (1979). The Available State: Problems of Reform. West European Politics, 2(3), 149–65.Google Scholar

DOF (2018). Decreto por el que se expide la Ley Federal de Remuneraciones de los Servidores Públicos, Reglamentos de los artículos 75 y 127 de la Constitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos y se adiciona el Código Penal Federal. Diario Oficial de la Federación, November 5.Google Scholar

Dolejší, V. & Prchal, L. (2016). Zrušte Trafiky, Volte Profíky, Hlásala Krnáčová Před Volbami. Dnes Rozdává Funkce Za Loajalitu. Hospodářské Noviny, May 18. Available from https://archiv.ihned.cz/c1-65295940-zruste-trafiky-volte-profiky-krnacova-porusuje-slib-ano-aby-ziskala-loajalituGoogle Scholar

Dostal, V., Győri, L., Meseznikov, G., Przybylski, W. & Zgut, E. (eds.) (2018). Illiberalism in the V4: Pressure Points and Bright Spots. Budapest: Political Capital and Friedrich Naumann Stiftung.Google Scholar

Downs, A. (1965). A Theory of Bureaucracy. American Economic Review, 55(1/2), 439–46.Google Scholar

Drabik, P. (2020). Fundusz Inwestycji Lokalnych. Miliardy tylko dla stronników PiS? Available from https://biznes.radiozet.pl/News/Fundusz-Inwestycji-Lokalnych.-Start-naboru-wnioskowGoogle Scholar

Drápalová, E. & Wegrich, K. (2020). Technocratic Populism and Subnational Governance. Government and Opposition: An International Journal of Comparative Politics, 1–21.Google Scholar

Duque, D. & Smith, A. E. (2019). The Establishment Upside Down: A Year of Change in Brazil. Revista de Ciencia Política, 39(2), 165–89.Google Scholar

Durant, R. F. (1992). The Administrative Presidency Revisited: Public Lands, the BLM, and the Reagan Revolution, New York, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Durant, R. F. & Ali, S. B. (2012). Repositioning American Public Administration? Citizen Estrangement, Administrative Reform, and the Disarticulated State. Public Administration Review, 73(2), 278–89.Google Scholar

Dussauge-Laguna, M. I. (2011). The Challenges of Implementing Merit Based Personnel Policies in Latin America: Mexico’s Civil Service Reform Experience. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 13(1), 51–73.Google Scholar

Dussauge-Laguna, M. I. (2015). Mitos y realidades de los Organismos Constitucionales Autónomos. Revista de Administración Pública, 50(138), 225–45.Google Scholar

Dussauge-Laguna, M. I. & Casas, A. (in press). Patronage in the Mexican Public Sector. In Panizza, F., Peters, B. G., & Ramos, C., eds., Patronage in Transition Across Latin America. Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Eatwell, R. & Goodwin, M. (2018). National Populism: The Revolt Against Liberal Democracy. London: Pelican.Google Scholar

Ebinger, F., Veit, S. & Fromm, N. (2019). The Partisan–Professional Dichotomy Revisited: Politicization and Decision‐making of Senior Civil Servants. Public Administration, 97(4), 861–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12613Google Scholar

Edelson, C. (2016). Power Without Constraint: The Post 9/11 Presidency and National Security. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

EIU – The Economist Intelligence Unit. (2017). Democracy Index 2017: Free Speech Under Attack. Available from www.eiu.com/public/topical_report.aspx?campaignid=DemocracyIndex2017Google Scholar

Eizaguirre, S., Pradel-Miquel, M. & García, M. (2017). Citizenship Practices and Democratic Governance: “Barcelona En Comú” as an Urban Citizenship Confluence Promoting a New Policy Agenda. Citizenship Studies, 21(4), 425–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2017.1307609Google Scholar

El Financiero (2018). Regulador de energía recorta a 367 empleados, el 60% de su personal. El Financiero, December 17.Google Scholar

El Heraldo de México (2019a). Nadie puede ganar más que el presidente, asegura López Obrador. El Heraldo de México, May 6.Google Scholar

El Heraldo de México (2019b). SEP anuncia el despido del 30% de empleados de confianza. El Heraldo de México, January 17.Google Scholar

El Nacional (2015). Siete días, El Nacional, October 25. Retrieved from www.el-nacional.com/siete_dias/Militares-controlan-ministerios-Maduro-Chavez_0_725927455.html [link defunct at publication].Google Scholar

El País (2006). López Obrador se proclama “presidente legítimo” de México. El País, November 20.Google Scholar

El Sol de México (2019). Yo tengo otros datos. AMLO desestima reporte de Bank of America. El Sol de México, January 16.Google Scholar

Elchardus, M. & Spruyt, B. (2016). Populism, Persistent Republicanism and Declinism: An Empirical Analysis of Populism as a Thin Ideology. Government and Opposition, 51(1), 111–33.Google Scholar

Ellner, S. & Tinker Salas, M. (eds.) (2007). Venezuela: Hugo Chávez and the Decline of an “Exceptional Democracy.” Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

ENCOVI (2020). Proyecto Encuesta Nacional de Condiciones de Vida de la Población Venezolana), Presentación de resultados 2014–2018. Retrieved from https://encovi.ucab.edu.ve/divulgacion/indicadores/ [link defunct at publication].Google Scholar

Erdmann, G. (2013). Neopatrimonialism and Political Regimes. In Cheeseman, N., Anderson, D., & Scheibler, A., eds., Routledge Handbook of African Politics. London: Routledge, pp. 59–69.Google Scholar

Esmark, A. (2017). Maybe It Is Time to Rediscover Technocracy? An Old Framework for a New Analysis of Administrative Reforms in the Governance Era. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(3), 501–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muw059Google Scholar

Espinasa, R. (2006). El auge y el colapso de Pdvsa a los treinta años de la nacionalización. Revista Venezolana de Economía y Ciencias Sociales, 112(1), 147–82.Google Scholar

etcétera (2019). Justifica AMLO compra de pipas sin licitación; no tenemos problemas de conciencia, asegura. Etcétera, January 21.Google Scholar

Evans, P. (1995). Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Evans, M. & Terrey, N. (2016). Co-design with Citizens and Stakeholders. In Stoker, G. & Evans, M., eds., Evidence-based Policymaking in the Social Sciences. Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 243–62.Google Scholar

Evans, P., Rueschemeyer, D. & Skocpol, T. (eds.) (1985). Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Expansión Política (2019). Gonzalo Hernández Licona es relevado de Coneval. Expansión Política, July 22.Google Scholar

Farazmand, A. (2010). Bureaucracy and Democracy: A Theoretical Analysis, Public Organization Review, 10(3), 245–258.Google Scholar

Fears, D. (2017). Zinke says his Workers are Disloyal. They say his Personnel Moves Break the Law. The Washington Post, September 27.Google Scholar

FH. (2020). Freedom House: Freedom in the World Report. Available from https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-worldGoogle Scholar

Fiaschetti, M. E. & Sacchettoni, I. (2019). Roma, esposto dell’ex ad di Ama «Devi cambiare il bilancio». Le parole che imbarazzano la sindaca Raggi. Corriere della Sera. April 18. https://roma.corriere.it/notizie/politica/19_aprile_18/devi-cambiare-bilancio-dell-amale-parole-che-imbarazzano-sindaca-5b7156f0-6217-11e9-83f5-ccf392377deb.shtmlGoogle Scholar

Fischer, E. & Wittmann, R. (eds.) (2015). Geschichte des deutschen Buchhandels im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Fittipaldi, E. (2019). Rifiuti, Virginia Raggi: «Modifica Il Bilancio». Ma Il Manager Dice Di No e Viene Licenziato. L’Espresso, April 18. Available from http://espresso.repubblica.it/plus/articoli/2019/04/18/news/virginia-raggi-ama-lorenzo-bagnacani-esclusivo-1.333936Google Scholar

Folha de São Paulo (2004a). 54% Acreditam Que Lula Trabalha Muito. Folha de São Paulo. Available from www1.folha.uol.com.br/folha/brasil/ult96u66437.shtmlGoogle Scholar

Folha de São Paulo (2004b). Há Um Viés Autoritário No Governo Lula? Folha de São Paulo. Available from www1.folha.uol.com.br/fsp/brasil/fc1508200417.htmGoogle Scholar

Follesdal, A. & Hix, S. (2006). Why There Is a Democratic Deficit in the EU: A Response to Majone and Moravcsik. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(3), 533–62.Google Scholar

Föllmer, M. (2001). Der “kranke Volkskörper.” Industrielle, hohe Beamte und der Diskurs der nationalen Regeneration in der Weimarer Republik. Geschichte und Gesellschaft, 27(1), 41–67.Google Scholar

Fonseca, D. (2018). AMLO: Yo o el diluvio. The New York Times, December 2.Google Scholar

Fraenkel, E. (2011). Deutschland und die westlichen Demokratien. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar

Freedom House. (2020). Report: “Nations in Transit 2020,” p. 25. Available from https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/2020-04/05062020_FH_NIT2020_vfinal.pdfGoogle Scholar

Frenk, J. & Gómez, O. (2019). Salud: manual de una contrarreforma reaccionaria. Nexos, December.Google Scholar

Frieden, T., Koplan, J., Satcher, D. & Besser, R. (2020). We Ran the CDC. No President Ever Politicized Its Science the Way Trump Has. The Washington Post, July 14.Google Scholar

Fukuyama, F. (1989). The End of History? The National Interest, 16, 3–18.Google Scholar

Fukuyama, F. (2006). The End of History and The Last Man. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar

Gailmard, S. & Patty, J. W. (2007). Slackers and Zealots: Civil Service, Policy Discretion, and Bureaucratic Expertise. American Journal of Political Science, 51(4), 873–89.Google Scholar

Gailmard, S. & Patty, J. (2013). Learning While Governing. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galston, W. A. (2018). Anti-pluralism: The Populist Threat to Liberal Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

García, I. (2018). ¿Y el presupuesto anticorrupción? Reporte índigo, December 19.Google Scholar

Garrido, S. (2018). Los municipios de la consulta del aeropuerto. Nexos, October.Google Scholar

Germani, G. (1978). Authoritarianism, Fascism and National Populism. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar

Golden, M. M. (1992). Exit, Voice, Loyalty, and Neglect: Bureaucratic Responses to Presidential Control During the Reagan Administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2(1), 29–62.Google Scholar

Golden, M. M. (2000). What Motivates Bureaucrats? Politics and Administration During the Reagan Years. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Gómez-Hermosillo, R. (2019a). Réquiem por Progresa-Oportunidades-Prospera. El Universal, June 11.Google Scholar

Gómez-Hermosillo, R. (2019b). Secuela de la desaparición de Prospera. El Universal, June 25.Google Scholar

Gonzales-Ocantos, E., De Jonge, C. K., Meléndez, C., Osorio, J. & Nickerson, D. W. (2012). Vote Buying and Social Desirability Bias: Experimental Evidence from Nicaragua. American Journal of Political Science, 56(1), 202–17.Google Scholar

González, L. (2018). ¿Esquivel, el próximo gobernador del Banxico? El Economista, November 26.Google Scholar

González, S. (2019). Conferencias matutinas de AMLO no deben ser una homilía: Coparmex. La Jornada, April 14.Google Scholar

Goodman, R. & Schulkin, D. (2020). Timeline of the Coronavirus Pandemic and US Response. Just Security, April 13. Available from www.justsecurity.org/69650/timeline-of-the-coronavirus-pandemic-and-u-s-response/Google Scholar

Goodsell, C. T. (2019). The Anti-Public Administration Presidency: The Damage Trump Has Wrought. The American Review of Public Administration, 49(8), 871–83.Google Scholar

Görtemaker, M. & Safferling, C. (eds.) (2014). Die Rosenburg. Das Bundesministerium der Justiz und die NS-Vergangenheit – eine Bestandsaufnahme, 2nd ed. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar

Gössel, K.-D. (2002). Beamtentum im Nationalsozialismus. In Friedensberger, M., Gössel, K.-D., & Schönknecht, E., eds., Die Reichsfinanzverwaltung im Nationalsozialismus. Darstellung und Dokumente. Bremen: Ed. Temmen, pp. 95–142.Google Scholar

Gotto, B. (2006). Polykratische Selbststabilisierung. Mittel- und Unterinstanzen in der NS-Diktatur. In Hachtmann, R., ed., Hitlers Kommissare. Sondergewalten in der nationalsozialistischen Diktatur. Göttingen: Wallstein (Beiträge zur Geschichte des Nationalsozialismus, 22), pp. 28–50.Google Scholar

Gottwaldt, A. B. & Bartelsheim, U. (2009). Eisenbahner gegen Hitler. Widerstand und Verfolgung bei der Reichsbahn 1933–1945. Wiesbaden: Marix Verlag.Google Scholar

Gowen, A., Eilperin, J., Guarino, B. & Ba Tran, A. (2020). Science Ranks Grow Thin in Trump Administration. The Washington Post, January 23.Google Scholar

Graff, G. (2020). 25 years after Oklahoma City, domestic terrorism is on the rise. Wired, April 19. Available from www.wired.com/story/oklahoma-city-bombing-christopher-wray/Google Scholar

Green, J. & Jennings, W. (2017). The Politics of Competence. Parties, Public Opinion and Voters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Grillo, B. & Casaleggio, G. (2011). Siamo in Guerra per Una Nuova Politica. Milan: Chiarelettere.Google Scholar

Gualmini, E. (2002). The Case of Italy. In Peters, B.G. and Braans, M., eds., Rewards for High Public Office in Europe and Northern America. London: Routledge, pp. 96–110.Google Scholar

Guarino, B. (2019). USDA relocation has delayed key studies and millions in funding, employees say. Washington Post, October 2.Google Scholar

Hachtmann, R. (2011). Elastisch, dynamisch und von katastrophaler Effizienz – zur Struktur der Neuen Staatlichkeit des Nationalsozialismus. In Reichardt, S. & Seibel, W., eds., Der prekäre Staat. Herrschen und Verwalten im Nationalsozialismus. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag, pp. 29–74.Google Scholar

Hajnal, G. (2016). Illiberal or Simply Unorthodox? Public Administration Education in Hungary and Europe: A Comparative Perspective. Teaching Public Administration, 34(2), 206–25.Google Scholar

Hajnal, G., & Csengődi, S. (2014). When Crisis Hits Superman: Change and Stability of Political Control and Politicization in Hungary. Administrative Culture, 15(1), 39–57.Google Scholar

Hajnal, G. & Rosta, M. (2016). A New Doctrine in the Making? Doctrinal Foundations of Sub-National Governance Reforms in Hungary (2010–2014). Administration & Society, Online first.Google Scholar

Hanley, S. & Sikk, A. (2016). Economy, Corruption or Floating Voters? Explaining the Breakthroughs of Anti-Establishment Reform Parties in Eastern Europe. Party Politics, 22(4), 522–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068814550438.Google Scholar

Hardin, R. (2006). Trust, Oxford: Polity.Google Scholar

Hart, D. K. (1984). The Virtuous Citizen, the “Honorable bureaucrat,” and Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 44(1), 111–20.Google Scholar

Hart, R. P. (2020). Donald Trump and the Return of the Paranoid Style. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 50(2), 348–65.Google Scholar

Havlík, V. (2019). Technocratic Populism and Political Illiberalism in Central Europe. Problems of Post-Communism, 69(6), 369–84.Google Scholar

Heady, F. (1996). Configurations of Civil Service Systems. In Bekke, H. A. G. M., Perry, J. L., & Toonen, T. A. J., eds., Civil Service Systems in Comparative Perspective. Bloomington & Indiana, IN: Indiana University Press, pp. 207–26.Google Scholar

Heckman, J. (2018). Are More Federal Employees Leaving under a Trump Administration? Federal News Network, March 26. Available from https://federalnewsnetwork.com/workforce/2018/03/federal-employee-turnover-increases-in-trump-administrations-first-year/Google Scholar

Heclo, H. (1974). Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Hehl, U. V. (2001). Nationalsozialistische Herrschaft, 2nd ed. Munich: Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag.Google Scholar

Heinze, A. S. (2018). Strategies of Mainstream Parties Towards their Right-wing Populist Challengers. West European Politics, 41(2), 287–309.Google Scholar

Hernández, A. (2019). Gobierno notifica a Metlife cancelación de seguro de gastos médicos. El Universal, January 2.Google Scholar

Hetland, G. (2017). From System Collapse to Chavista Hegemony. The Party Question in Bolivarian Venezuela. Latin American Perspectives, 44(1), 117–36.Google Scholar

Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Hoffmann-Lange, U. (2018). Methods of Elite Identification. In Best, H. & Higley, J., eds., The Palgrave Handbook of Political Elites. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 79–92.Google Scholar

Hofstadter, R. (2012). The Paranoid Style in American Politics. New York, NY: Vintage.Google Scholar

Hood, C. (2006). Gaming in Target World. Public Administration Review, 66(4), 515–21.Google Scholar

Hood, C. & Lodge, M. (2006). The Politics of Public Service Bargains: Reward, Competency, Loyalty – and Blame. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Huber, J. D., & Shipan, C. R. (2002). Deliberate Discretion? The Institutional Foundations of Bureaucratic Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hunter, W. & Power, T. J. (2019). Bolsonaro and Brazil’s Illiberal Backlash. Journal of Democracy, 30(1), 68–82.Google Scholar

Hupe, P. (2019). Research Handbook on Street-Level Bureaucracy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hustedt, T. & Salomonsen, H. H. (2014). Ensuring Political Responsiveness: Politicization Mechanisms in Ministerial Bureaucracies. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 80(4), 1–20.Google Scholar

Hüttenberger, P. (1976). Nationalsozialistische Polykratie. Geschichte und Gesellschaft, 2(4), 417–42. Available from www.jstor.org/stable/40185021Google Scholar

Ichino, P. (2006). I nullafacenti. Milan: Mondadori.Google Scholar

iDNES.cz. (2018). ANO Dělá Veletoče v Dozorčích Radách. Rozdávají Se Trafiky, Tvrdí Opozice. iDNES.Cz, April 9. Available from www.idnes.cz/praha/zpravy/ano-dozorci-rady-mestske-firmy-praha-kompetence-zkusenosti.A180409_084258_praha-zpravy_rsrGoogle Scholar

Illés, G., Körösényi, A. & Metz, R. (2018). Broadening the Limits of Reconstructive Leadership: Constructivist Elements of Viktor Orbán’s Regime-Building Politics. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 20(4), 790–808.Google Scholar

Impacto redacción (2019). Yo tengo otros datos, el desempleo a disminuido: AMLO, Impacto, May 17.Google Scholar

INE (2020). (Instituto Nacional de Estadística), Poverty indicators Database 1998–2013. Available from www.ine.gob.veGoogle Scholar

Ingraham, P. W. (1995). The Foundation of Merit: Public Service in American Democracy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Ingram, H., de Leon, P. & Schneider, A. (2016). Conclusion: Public Policy Theory and Democracy: The Elephant in the Corner. In Peters, B. G. & Zittoun, P., eds., Contemporary Approaches to Public Policy: Theories, Controversies and Perspectives. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 175–200.Google Scholar

Iturbe, E. (2017). La institucionalidad administrativa de la revolución bolivariana y las políticas públicas. In Urbaneja, D., ed., Desarmando el modelo. Las transformaciones del sistema político venezolano desde 1999. Caracas: ABCEdiciones, pp. 195–224.Google Scholar

Jilke, S. & Baekgaard, M. (2020). The Political Psychology of Citizen Satisfaction: Does Functional Responsibility Matter? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 30(1), 130–43.Google Scholar

Juárez, M. (2019). Masones reclaman que evangélicos hagan reparto de la Cartilla Moral. La Razón, July 8.Google Scholar

Kaltwasser, C. (2015). Explaining the Emergence of Populism in Europe and the Americas. In de La Torre, C., ed., The Promise and Perils of Populism: Global Perspectives. Lexington, KY: University Press, pp. 189–227.Google Scholar

Kam, C. & Trussler, M. (2017). At the Nexus of Observational and Experimental Research, Specification, and Analysis of Experiments with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects. Political Behavior, 39(4), 789–815.Google Scholar

Katz, Eric. (2019). Mulvaney: Relocating Offices is a “Wonderful Way” to Shed Federal Employees. Government Executive, August 15. Available from www.govexec.com/workforce/2019/08/mulvaney-relocating-offices-wonderful-way-shed-federal-employees/158932/Google Scholar

Kenny, P. D. (2017). Populist and Patronage: Why Populists Win Elections in India, Asia and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kettl, D. (2017). Can Governments Earn Our Trust? Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Kickert, W. & Ongaro, E. (2019). Influence of EU (and IMF) on Domestic Consolidation and Reform: Introduction. Public Management Review, 21(9), 1261–64.Google Scholar

Klijn, E.H. (2016). Managing Commercialised Media Attention in Complex Governance Networks: Positive and Negative Effects on Network Performance, Policy and Politics, 44(1), 115–33.Google Scholar

Knill, C. (1999). Explaining Cross-national Variance in Administrative Reform: Autonomous versus Instrumental Bureaucracies. Journal of Public Policy, 19(1), 113–39.Google Scholar

Konstytucja (1997). Konstytucja Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej z dnia 2 kwietnia 1997 r. (Dz.U. 1997, nr 78, poz. 483).Google Scholar

Kopecký, P., Mair, P., & Spirova, M. (eds.) (2012). Party Patronage and Party Government in European Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kopińska, G. (2018). Stanowiska publiczne jako łup polityczny. Polityka personalna w okresie od 16 listopada 2015 do 31 października 2017 roku. Warsaw: Fundacja im. Stefana Batorego.Google Scholar

Kordt, E. (1938). The Public Servant in Germany. Public Administration, 16(2), 173–84.Google Scholar

Korkut, U. (2012). Liberalization Challenges in Hungary. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Kornai, J. (2015). Hungary’s U-Turn. Capitalism and Society, 10(1), 1–24.Google Scholar

Körösényi, A. & Patkós, V. (2017). Liberal and Illiberal Populism. The Leadership of Berlusconi and Orbán. Corvinus Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 8(38), 315–37.Google Scholar

Kovács, É. & Hajnal, G. (2017). Hungary’s Central State Administration 1990–2014. In Nemec, J. & Spacek, D., eds., 25 Years of Public Administration Developments and Reforms in the V4 Region. Brno: Masarik University, pp. 48–83.Google Scholar

Krastev, I. (2017). After Europe. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Krauze, E. (2006). El mesías tropical. Letras Libres, June.Google Scholar

Krnáčová, A. (2014). Adriana Krnáčová: Žvanit Neumím. Já to Prostě Udělám. ANO Bude Líp (blog). July 10. Available from www.anobudelip.cz/cs/makame/archiv/z-medii/adriana-krnacova-zvanit-neumim.-ja-to-proste-udelam-18708.shtmlGoogle Scholar

Kubicka-Żach, K. (2020). Urzędnicy: Państwo też powinno chronić miejsca pracy. Available from www.prawo.pl/samorzad/redukcja-etatow-i-zmniejszenie-wynagrodzen-w-administracji-maja, 500386.htmlGoogle Scholar

Kulcsár, K. (2001). Deviant Bureaucracies. Public Administration in Eastern Europe and in the Developing Countries. In Farazmand, A., ed., Handbook of Comparative and Development Public Administration. Public Administration and Public Policy 94, New York, NY: Marcel Dekker, pp. 941–52.Google Scholar

Kuller, C. (2013). Bürokratie und Verbrechen: Antisemitische Finanzpolitik und Verwaltungspraxis im nationalsozialistischen Deutschland. Munich: Oldenbourg.Google Scholar

Kullgren, I. (2019). White House Memo Details Divide-and-Conquer Labor Strategy. Politico. September 4. Available from www.politico.com/news/2019/10/04/federal-employees-white-house-memo-028954Google Scholar

La Razón (2018). Confirmado: Economía desaparece ProMéxico e Inadem. La Razón, December 20.Google Scholar

La redacción Proceso (2019a). Inai ordena a la SEP informar el costo de las 100 universidades “Benito Juárez.” Proceso, June 17.Google Scholar

La redacción Proceso (2019b). Memorándum contra reforma educativa, fácilmente impugnable: José Ramón Cossío. Proceso, April 17.Google Scholar

Lehmbruch, G. (1991). The Organization of Society, Administrative Strategies, and Policy Networks. In Czada, R. M. & Windhoff-Héritier, A., eds., Political Choice: Institutions, Rules, and the Limits of Rationality. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 121–55.Google Scholar

Levine, D. (1978). Venezuela since 1958: The Consolidation of Democratic Politics. In Linz, J. & Stepan, A., eds., The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 82–109.Google Scholar

Levine, D. (1989). Venezuela: The Nature, Sources, and Prospects of Democracy. In Diamond, L., Linz, J., & Lipset, S., eds., Democracy in Developing Countries, Volume 4: Latin America. Boulder, CO: Westview, pp. 247–89.Google Scholar

Levitsky, S. (2018). Latin America’s Shifting Politics: Democratic Survival and Weakness. Journal of Democracy, 29(4), 102–13.Google Scholar

Levitsky, S. & Ziblatt, D. (2018a). How Democracies Die. New York, NY: Crown Publishing.Google Scholar

Levitsky, S. & Ziblatt, D. (2018b). How Democracies Die: What History Reveals About Our Future. London: Viking.Google Scholar

Lewis, D. E. (2007). Testing Pendleton’s Premise: Do Political Appointees Make Worse Bureaucrats? The Journal of Politics, 69(4), 1073–88.Google Scholar

Lewis, D. E. (2008). The Politics of Presidential Appointments: Political Control and Bureaucratic Performance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Lewis, J. (2015). The Politics and Consequences of Performance Measurement. Policy and Society, 34(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2015.03.001Google Scholar

Lewis, M. (2018). The Fifth Risk. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar

Light, P. (2017). The True Size of Government: Tracking Washington’s Blended Workforce 1984–2015. Volcker Alliance Issue Paper. Available from www.volckeralliance.org/publications/true-size-governmentGoogle Scholar

Lindblom, C. (1990). Inquiry and Change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Linz, J. (1990). The Perils of Presidentialism. Journal of Democracy, 1(1), 51–90.Google Scholar

Linz, J. & Stepan, A. (1996). Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Lipset, S. M. (1959). Some Social Requisites of Democracy. Economic Development and Political Legitimacy. American Political Science Review, 53(1), 69–105.Google Scholar

Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-Level Bureaucracy. Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services, expanded ed. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Lipton, E., Goodnough, A., Shear, M., et al. (2020). The CDC Waited “Its Entire Existence for this Moment.” What Went Wrong? New York Times, June 3.Google Scholar

Lipton, E., Haberman, M. & Mazzetti, M. (2019). Inside Ukraine Aid Freeze: An 84-day Clash of Wills. New York Times, December 30.Google Scholar

Lipton, E., Vogel, K. & Friedman, L. (2018). EPA Officials Sidelined After Questioning Scott Pruitt. The New York Times, April 5.Google Scholar

López, A. (2018). Vocero de AMLO: no desaparecen oficinas de prensa, sólo se reducen. La Razón, September 3.Google Scholar

López, C. (2019). En el Gobierno se acabaron los “chapulines fifís,” declara AMLO. La Razón, February 12.Google Scholar

López, I. (2018). Los “hoyos negros” de la consulta por el aeropuerto en Texcoco o Santa Lucía. Forbes, December 31.Google Scholar

López-Ayllón, S. (2019). El memorando y el orden constitucional. Milenio, April 17.Google Scholar

López-Obrador, A. M. (2018). Mensaje del Presidente de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos Andrés Manuel López Obrador. Reprinted in Revista IAPEM, 101, 155–68.Google Scholar

Lowndes, V., Pratchett, L. & Stoker, G. (2006). Diagnosing and Remedying the Failings of Official Participation Schemes: The CLEAR Framework. Social Policy and Society, 5(2), 281–91.Google Scholar

Luce, E. (2017). The Retreat of Western Liberalism. New York, NY: Atlantic Monthly Press.Google Scholar

Lührmann, A. & Lindberg, S. (2019). A Third Wave of Autocratization Is Here: What Is New About It? Democratization, 26(7), 1095–113.Google Scholar

Lührmann, A., Grahn, S., Morgan, R., Pillai, S. & Lindberg, S. I. (2019). State of the World 2018: Democracy Facing Global Challenges. Democratization, 26(6), 895–915.Google Scholar

Lührmann, A., Maerz, S. F., Grahn, S., et al. (2020). Autocratization Surges – Resistance Grows. Democracy Report 2020. Varieties of Democracy Institute (V-Dem). Gothenburg. Available from www.v-dem.net/media/filer_public/de/39/de39af54-0bc5-4421-89ae-fb20dcc53dba/democracy_report.pdfGoogle Scholar

Lührmann, A., Medzihorsky, J., Hindle, G. & Lindberg, S.I. (2020). New Global Data on Political Parties: V-Party. Briefing Paper #9, October 26 2020. Available from www.v-dem.net/media/filer_public/b6/55/b6553f85-5c5d-45ec-be63-a48a2abe3f62/briefing_paper_9.pdfGoogle Scholar

Madureira, N. L. (2007). Cartelization and Corporatism: Bureaucratic Rule in Authoritarian Portugal, 1926–45. Journal of Contemporary History, 42(1), 79–96.Google Scholar

Maerz, S. F., Lührmann, A., Hellmeier, S., Grahn, S. & Lindberg, S. I. (2020). State of the World 2019: Autocratization Surges – Resistance Grows. Democratization, 27(6), 909–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2020.1758670Google Scholar

Mainwaring, S. & Pérez-Liñán, A. (2014). Democracies and Dictatorships in Latin America: Emergence, Survival, and Fall. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mainwaring, S., Bizzarro, F. & Petrova, A. (2018). Party System Institutionalization, Decay and Collapse. In Mainwaring, S., ed., Party Systems in Latin America: Institutionalization, Decay and Collapse. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, pp. 17–33.Google Scholar

Mair, P. (2013). Ruling the Void: The Hollowing Out of Western Democracy. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Majer, D. (1987). Grundlagen des nationalsozialistischen Rechtssystems: Führerprinzip, Sonderrecht, Einheitspartei. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar

Majone, G. (2001). Two Logics of Delegation: Agency and Fiduciary Relations in EU Governance. European Union Politics, 2(1), 103–22.Google Scholar

Maldonado, M. (2018). AMLO vs. Banxico: jugando con fuego. El Universal, September 19.Google Scholar

Maldonado, M. (2019). Crisis en la CNBV; 42 renuncias y contando. El Universal, October 7.Google Scholar

Mandavilli, A. (2020). CDC Testing Guidance was Published against Scientist’s Objections. The New York Times, September 17.Google Scholar

Manow, P. (2018). Die Politische Ökonomie des Populismus. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Manow, P. (2020). (Ent-)Demokratisierung der Demokratie. Berlin: Edition Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

March, H. & Ribera-Fumaz, R. (2018). Barcelona: From Corporate Smart City to Technological Sovereignty. In Karvonen, A., Cugurullo, F., & Caprotti, F., eds., Inside Smart Cities. Place, Politics, and Urban Innovation. Abingdon; New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 229–43.Google Scholar

Martínez, L. (2018). ¿Qué dice el decreto de la Ley de Salarios Máximos de los funcionarios públicos? El Economista, November 5.Google Scholar

Mattei, P. (2007). Italian Democracy Under Threat? The Spoils System in Historical Perspective. In Page, E.C. & Wright, V., eds., From the Active to the Enabling State: The Changing Role of Top Officials in European Nations. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave, pp. 81–98.Google Scholar

Mayer, J. (2019). The Making of the Fox News White House. The New Yorker, March 4.Google Scholar

Mazur, S. & Hausner, J. (2010). Aparat administracyjny państwa jako agent zmiany. In Morawski, W., ed., Modernizacja Polski: struktury, agencje, instytucje. Warsaw: Wydawnictwa Akademickie i Profesjonalne; Akademia Leona Koźmińskiego, pp. 382–401.Google Scholar

Mazur, S. (ed.) (2020). Public Administration in Central Europe: Ideas as Causes of Reforms. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Mazur, S., Możdżeń, M. & Oramus, M. (2018). The Instrumental and Ideological Politicisation of Senior Positions in Poland’s Civil Service and its Selected Consequences. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, 11(1), 63–89.Google Scholar

McDermott, R. (2002). Experimental Methodology in Political Science. Political Analysis, 10(4), 325–42.Google Scholar

Meier, K. J. (1993): Representative Bureaucracy: A Theoretical and Empirical Exposition. In Perry, J. L., ed., Research in Public Administration. Vol. 2, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 1–35.Google Scholar

Meier, K. J. & O’Toole, L. J. (2006). Bureaucracy in a Democratic State. A Governance Perspective. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Mejía, X. & González, I. (2019). Germán Martínez renuncia al IMSS; denuncia política de recortes y despidos. Excélsior, May 22.Google Scholar

Mele, V. & Ongaro, E. (2014). Public Sector Reform in a Context of Political Instability: Italy 1992–2007. International Public Management Journal, 17(1), 111–42.Google Scholar

Méndez, J. L. (1997). The Latin American Administrative Tradition. In Shafritz, J. M., ed., International Encyclopedia of Public Policy and Administration. Boulder, CO: Westview, pp. 1254–1261.Google Scholar

Méndez, J. L. & Dussauge-Laguna, M. I. (2017). Introduction. In Méndez, J. L. & Dussauge-Laguna, M. I., eds., Policy Analysis in Mexico. Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar

Mény, Y. & Surel, Y. (eds.) (2002). Democracies and the Populist Challenge. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Merino, M. (2013). La captura de los puestos públicos. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, 58(219), 135–56.Google Scholar

Merkel, W., Puhle, H.-J., Croissant, A., Eicher, C. & Thiery, P. (2003). Defekte Demokratie. Band 1: Theorie. Opladen: Leske+Budrich.Google Scholar

Metro News. (2016). Raggi: noi facciamo quello che diciamo. Metro news, June 14. Available from www.metronews.it/16/06/14/raggi-noi-facciamo-quello-che-diciamo.html.Google Scholar

Meyer-Sahling, J. H. (2011). The Durability of EU Civil Service Policy in Central and Eastern Europe after Accession. Governance, 24(2), 231–60.Google Scholar

Meyer-Sahling, J. H. & Jáger, K. (2012). Party Patronage in Hungary: Capturing the State. In Kopecký, P., Mair, P., & Spirova, M., eds., Party Patronage and Party Government in European Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 163–185.Google Scholar

Meyer-Sahling, J.-H. & Veen, T. (2012). Governing the Post-Communist State: Government Alternation and Senior Civil Service Politicisation in Central and Eastern Europe. East European Politics, 28(1), 4–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523279.2011.635651Google Scholar

Michels, R. (1915). Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. New York, NY: Hearst Library.Google Scholar

Middendorf, S. (2015). Finanzpolitische Fundamente der Demokratie? Haushaltsordnung, Ministerialbürokratie und Staatsdenken in der Weimarer Republik. In Müller, T. B. & Tooze, A., eds., Normalität und Fragilität: Demokratie nach dem Ersten Weltkrieg. Hamburg: Hamburger Edition HIS, pp. 315–43.Google Scholar

Miranda, P. (2019). Recortes presupuestales afectan a 3 mil 500 pacientes del Instituto Nacional de Cancerología. El Universal, May 24.Google Scholar

Miranda, F. & Guerrero, K. (2020). Gobierno federal desaparece subsecretarías como medida de austeridad ante covid-19. Milenio. August 28.Google Scholar

Moe, T. M. (1985). The Politicized Presidency. In Chubb, J. & Peterson, Paul E., eds., The New Direction in American Politics. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, pp. 235–71.Google Scholar

Mommsen, H. (1973). Die Stellung der Beamtenschaft in Reich, Ländern und Gemeinden in der Ära Brüning. Vierteljahreshefte für Zeitgeschichte, 21(2), 151–65.Google Scholar

Mommsen, H. (2010). Beamtentum im Dritten Reich. Munich: Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag.Google Scholar

Monroy, L. A. (2019). Políticas públicas: Transferencias con pies de barro. Nexos, September 1.Google Scholar

Morales, A. (2019). Aunque me digan mesiánico voy a purificar el país: AMLO, El Universal, January 21.Google Scholar

Morales, A. (2020). AMLO pide a funcionarios “lealtad ciega” al proyecto de transformación. El Universal, September 24.Google Scholar

Morales, A. & Zavala, M. (2019). AMLO da estructura a superdelegados. El Universal, March 20.Google Scholar

Moreno, D. (2019). Derecho a saber. Reforma, January 20.Google Scholar

Morgan, E. P. & Perry, J. L. (1988). Re-orienting the Comparative Study of Civil Service Systems. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 8(3), 84–95.Google Scholar

Morlino, L. & Tarchi, M. (1996). The Dissatisfied Society: The Roots of Political Change in Italy. European Journal of Political Research, 30(1), 41–63.Google Scholar

Mosca, L. (2014). The Five Star Movement: Exception or Vanguard in Europe? The International Spectator, 49(1), 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2013.875821Google Scholar

Mosca, L. & Tronconi, F. (2019). Beyond Left and Right: The Eclectic Populism of the Five Star Movement. West European Politics, 42(6), 1258–83.Google Scholar

Mounk, Y. (2018). The People vs. Democracy. Why Our Freedom is in Danger and How to Save It. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Mouritzen, P. E. & Svara, J. (2012). Leadership at the Apex: Politicians and Administrators in Western Local Governments. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar

Moynihan, D. P. (2005). Homeland Security and the US Public Management Policy Agenda. Governance, 18(2), 171–96.Google Scholar

Moynihan, D. P. & Roberts, A. (2010). The Triumph of Loyalty Over Competence: The Bush Administration and the Exhaustion of the Politicized Presidency. Public Administration Review, 70(4), 572–81.Google Scholar

Mudde, C. (2004). The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.xGoogle Scholar

Mudde, C. (2016). On Extremism and Democracy in Europe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Mudde, C. (2017). “Populism.” Three Conversations about the Rise of Populism in the West. Background papers prepared for the GAC/POR “Fast Talk” Teleconference on Populism in the West & the International Order.Google Scholar

Mudde, C. (2017). Populism. An Ideational Approach. In Kaltwasser, C. Rovira, Taggart, P., Ocoa Espejo, P., & Ostiguy, P., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 27–47.Google Scholar

Mudde, C. (2019). The Far Right Today, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Mudde, C. & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2013). Exclusionary vs. Inclusionary Populism: Comparing Contemporary Europe and Latin America. Government and Opposition, 48(2), 147–74.Google Scholar

Mudde, C. & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2017). Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford; New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Muédano, M. (2019). Gobierno Federal sumó, en siete meses, casi medio millón de despidos. La silla rota. October 1.Google Scholar

Müller, J.-W. (2016a). Was ist Populismus?, Ein Essay. Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar

Müller, J.-W. (2016b). What Is Populism? Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Müller, J.-W. (2017). What Is Populism? London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Muno, W. (2005). Öl und Demokratie – Venezuela im 20. Jahrhundert. In Diehl, O. & Muno, W., eds., Venezuela unter Chávez – Aufbruch oder Niedergang? Frankfurt: Vervuert, pp. 11–34.Google Scholar

Muno, W. (2015). ALBA, UNASUR und CELAC. In Grimmel, A. & Jakobeit, C., eds., Regionale Integration. Erklärungsansätze und Analysen zu den wichtigsten Integrationszusammenschlüssen in der Welt. Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 412–431.Google Scholar

Nery, N., Seabra, C. & Franco, B. M. (2011). Cúpula Do PT Defende Controle Da Mídia. Folha de São Paulo. Available from www1.folha.uol.com.br/fsp/poder/po0209201112.htmGoogle Scholar

Neuhold, C., Vanhoonacker, S. & Verhey, L. (2013). Civil Servants and Politics: The Delicate Balance. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Niskanen, W. A. (1971). Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago, IL and New York, NY: Aldine-Atherton.Google Scholar

Nistotskaya, M. & Cingolani, L. (2016). Bureaucratic Structure, Regulatory Quality, and Entrepreneurship in a Comparative Perspective: Cross-Sectional and Panel Data Evidence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(3), 519–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muv026Google Scholar

Norden, D. (2008). Assessing Venezuelan Political-Military Relations Under Chávez. Nueva Sociedad, 213(8), 170–87.Google Scholar

Nordlinger, E. A. (1981). On the Autonomy of the Democratic State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Norris, P. (ed.) (1999). Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Norris, P. & Inglehart, R. (2019). Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nunes, F. & Melo, C. R. (2017). Impeachment, Crisis Política y Democracia En Brasil. Revista de Ciencia Política, 37(2), 281–304.Google Scholar

Nützenadel, A. (ed.) (2017). Das Reichsarbeitsministerium im Nationalsozialismus. Verwaltung – Politik – Verbrechen. Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag.Google Scholar

O Antagonista. (2020). Com só 12 inscritos, plano de Aras para a Lava Jato fracassa. O Antagonista. Available from www.oantagonista.com/brasil/com-so-12-inscritos-plano-de-aras-para-a-lava-jato-fracassa/Google Scholar

O’Donnell, G. (1979). Modernization and Bureaucratic Authoritarianism. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley University Press.Google Scholar

O’Donnell, G. (2011). Nuevas reflexiones acerca de la democracia delegativa. In O’Donnell, G., Iazzetta, O., & Quiroga, H., eds., Democracia Delegativa. Buenos Aires: Prometeo, pp. 19–35.Google Scholar

OECD (2001). Citizens as Partners. OECD Handbook on Information, Consultation and Public Participation in Decision-making. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar

OECD (2017). Trust and Public Policy: How Better Governance Can Help Rebuild Public Trust, OECD Public Governance Reviews. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264268920-enGoogle Scholar

O’Leary, R. (2006). The Ethics of Dissent: Managing Guerilla Government. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar

O’Leary, R. (2017). The Ethics of Dissent: Can President Trump Survive Guerrilla Government? Administrative Theory & Praxis, 39(2), 63–79.Google Scholar

O’Leary, R. (2020). The Ethics of Dissent: Managing Guerrilla Government, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar

Oliveira, M. (2020). Veja a íntegra do abaixo-assinado que questiona nomeação de Aras. Congresso em Foco. Available from https://congressoemfoco.uol.com.br/judiciario/procuradores-manifestam-insatisfacao-com-aras-e-promovem-abaixo-assinado/Google Scholar

O’Toole, L. J. (1997). Treating Networks Seriously: Practical and Research-Based Agendas in Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 57(1), 45–52.Google Scholar

Olsson, J. (2016). Subversion in Institutional Change and Stability: A Neglected Mechanism. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Ongaro, E. (ed.) (2006). Le Agenzie Pubbliche: Modelli Istituzionali ed Organizzativi. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.Google Scholar

Ongaro, E., (ed.) (2008). L’organizzazione dello Stato tra autonomia e policy capacity. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.Google Scholar

Ongaro, E. (2009). Public Management Reform and Modernization: Trajectories of Administrative Change in Italy, France, Greece, Portugal, Spain. Cheltenham and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Ongaro, E. (2010). The Napoleonic Administrative Tradition and Public Management Reform in France, Greece, Italy, Portugal, Spain. In Painter, M. & Peters, B.G., eds., Tradition and Public Administration. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 174–90.Google Scholar

Ongaro, E. (2011). The Role of Politics and Institutions in the Italian Administrative Reform Trajectory. Public Administration, 89(3), 738–55.Google Scholar

Ongaro, E. (2018). The Napoleonic Tradition in Public Administration. In Thompson, W., ed., Oxford Research Encyclopaedia of Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ongaro, E. (2020). Philosophy and Public Administration: An Introduction, 2nd ed. Cheltenham and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Ongaro, E. & Bellé, N. (2010). Réforme de la fonction publique et introduction de la rémunération liée aux performances en Italie: évidence empirique, interprétations et enseignements. Revue Française d’Administration Publique, 132(2010), 817–39.Google Scholar

Ongaro, E., Ferré, F., Galli, D. & Longo, F. (2016). Italy: Set Along a Neo-Weberian Trajectory of Administrative Reform? In Hammerschmid, G., Van de Walle, S., Andrews, R., & Bezes, P., eds., Public Administration Reforms in Europe: The View from the Top. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, pp. 185–93.Google Scholar

Ongaro, E. & Kickert, W. (2020). EU-driven Public Sector Reforms. Public Policy and Administration, 35(29), 117–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076719827624.Google Scholar

Ongaro, E. & Valotti, G. (2008). Public Management Reform in Italy: Explaining the Implementation Gap. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 21(2), 174–204.Google Scholar

Oppelt, R. (2016). Zeptali Jsme Se Opozice, Jak Hodnotí Vládnutí Primátorky Adriany Krnáčové, Metro.cz, November 3. Available from www.metro.cz/hodnoceni-adriany-krnacove-ddt-/praha.aspx?c=A161102_231449_praha-metro_lupoGoogle Scholar

Otto, P. & Thuong Ly, N. (2018). Stavěla Bych, Až Bych Brečela. Ale Nemohu, Říká Primátorka Adriana Krnáčová. E15.Cz, March 28. Available from www.e15.cz/rozhovory/stavela-bych-az-bych-brecela-ale-nemohu-rika-primatorka-adriana-krnacova-1344677Google Scholar

Overeem, P. (2005). The Value of the Dichotomy: Politics, Administration, and the Political Neutrality of Administrators. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 27(2), 311–29.Google Scholar

Paczocha, J. (2018). Raport Partia w Państwie. Bezprecedensowa wymiana kadr w administracji rządowej i jej legislacyjne podstawy. Warsaw: FOR.Google Scholar

Pakulski, J. (2016). Crumbling Elite Consensus and the Illiberal Turn in Poland. In Pakulski, J., ed., The Visegrad Countries Crisis. Warsaw: Collegium Civitas, pp. 51–65.Google Scholar

Panizza, F., Peters, B. G., & Ramos Larraburu, C. R. (2019). Roles, Trust and Skills: A Typology of Patronage Appointments. Public Administration, 97(1), 147–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12560Google Scholar

Pantoja, S. (2017). AMLO defiende alianza con el PES y asegura que respeta la diversidad sexual. Proceso, December 15.Google Scholar

Pap, A. L. (2017). Democratic Decline in Hungary: Law and Society in an Illiberal Democracy. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Papadopoulos, Y. (2002). Populism, the Democratic Question, and Contemporary Governance. In Mény, Y. & Surel, Y., eds., Democracies and the Populist Challenge. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan, pp. 45–61.Google Scholar

Papadopoulos, Y. (2007). Populizm, demokracja i współczesny model rządzenia. In Mény, Y. & Surel, Y., eds., Demokracja w obliczu populizmu. Warsaw: Oficyna Naukowa, pp. 86–7.Google Scholar

Pappas, T. S. (2019). Populists in Power. Journal of Democracy, 30(2), 70–84.Google Scholar

Pardo, M. C. (2020). El Desdén por la Administración Pública. In Cilano, Johanna & Sánchez, Ramiro (eds.), El México de la 4T. Transparencia Electoral – GAPAC, pp. 147–164.Google Scholar

Paredes, M. (2018). Sectur desparece el Consejo de Promoción Turística de México. Excélsior, December 7.Google Scholar

Parker, A. & Rucker, , P. (2017). Trump Taps Kushner to Lead a SWAT Team to Fix Government with Business Ideas. Washington Post, March 26. www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-taps-kushner-to-lead-a-swat-team-to-fix-government-with-business-ideas/2017/03/26/9714a8b6-1254-11e7-ada0-1489b735b3a3_story.htmlGoogle Scholar

Paxton, F. (2020). Towards a Populist Local Democracy? The Consequences of Populist Radical Right Local Government Leadership in Western Europe. Representation, 56(6), 411–30.Google Scholar

Penfold-Becerra, M. (2007). Clientelism and Social Funds: Evidence from Chávez’s Misiones. Latin American Politics and Society, 49(4), 63–84.Google Scholar

Pérez de Acha, L. (2019). El desgobierno de López Obrador. The New York Times, May 27.Google Scholar

Pérez-Liñán, A. (2018). Impeachment or Backsliding? Threats to Democracy in the Twenty-first Century. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, 33(98), 1–15.Google Scholar

Perrone, M. (2020). Nuovo Concorsone al Comune Di Roma: 1.512 Posti a Bando in Primavera. Sole 24 Ore, 2020. Available from www.ilsole24ore.com/art/nuovo-concorsone-comune-roma-1512-posti-bando-primavera-ACLzlhCBGoogle Scholar

Perry, J. L., Hondeghem, A. & Wise, L.R. (2010). Revisiting the Motivational Bases of Public Service: Twenty Years of Research and an Agenda for the Future. Public Administration Review, 70(5), 681–90.Google Scholar

Peters, B. G. (1988). Comparing Public Bureaucracies: Problems of Theory and Method. Tuscaloosa, AL: Alabama University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar

Peters, B. G. (2008). The Napoleonic Tradition. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 21(2), 118–32.Google Scholar

Peters, B. G. (2013). Politicization of the Civil Service: What is it and Why do we Care? In Neuhold, C., Vanhoonacker, S., & Verhey, L., eds., Civil Servants and Politics: The Delicate Balance. Basingstoke: Macmillan, pp. 12–24.Google Scholar

Peters, B. G. (2018a). The Politics of Bureaucracy: An Introduction to Comparative Public Administration, 7th ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Peters, B. G. (2018b). Comparative Politics and Comparative Policy Studies: Making the Linkage. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 20(1), 88–100.Google Scholar

Peters, B. G. (2019). Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism, 4th ed. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Peters, B. G. (2020). Administrative Traditions: Understanding the Roots of Contemporary Administrative Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Peters, B. G. & Pierre, J. (2017). Two Roads to Nowhere: Appraising 30 Years of Public Administration Research. Governance, 30(1), 11–16.Google Scholar

Peters, B. G. & Pierre, J. (2019). Populism and Public Administration: Confronting the Administrative State. Administration and Society, 51(10), 1521–45.Google Scholar

Peters, B. G. & Pierre, J. (2020). A Typology of Populism: Understanding the Different Forms of Populism and Their Implications. Democratization, 27(6), 928–946.Google Scholar

Peters, B. G., Ramos, C. & Alba, C. (Forthcoming). Handbook of Public Administration in Latin America. Bingley: Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar

Pettypiece, S. (2020). DHS Faces Coronavirus with Scores of Vacancies and a Leadership Vacuum. NBC News, March 16. Available from www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/dhs-faces-coronavirus-scores-vacancies-leadership-vacuum-n1160946Google Scholar

Pezzi, M. G. (2019). “Mafia Capitale”: Judicial and Symbolic Constructions of the New Italian Corruption. Journal of Modern Italian Studies, 24(3), 512–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354571X.2019.1576417Google Scholar

Pierre, J. & Peters, B. G. (2004). Politicization of the Civil Service: Concepts, Causes, Consequences. In Peters, B. G. & Pierre, J., eds., The Politicization of the Civil Service in Comparative Perspective. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 13–25.Google Scholar

Pierre, J. & Peters, B. G. (2017). The Shirking Bureaucrat: A Theory in Search of Evidence? Policy & Politics, 45(2), 157–72.Google Scholar

Pierson, P. (2017). American Hybrid: Donald Trump and the Strange Merger of Populism and Plutocracy. British Journal of Sociology, 68(S1), S105–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12323Google Scholar

PiS (2014). Program Prawa i Sprawiedliwości 2014. “Zdrowie Praca Rodzina.” Available from http://pis.org.pl/dokumentyGoogle Scholar

PiS (2019). Program Prawa i Sprawiedliwości 2019 “Polski Model Państwa Dobrobytu.” Available from http://pis.org.pl/dokumentyGoogle Scholar