Abelson, Julia and John Eyles 2002. Public participation and citizen governance in the Canadian health system. Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada. Discussion Paper 7. Ottawa: The Commission.

Althaus, Scott 2003. Collective preferences in democratic politics: Opinion surveys and the will of the people. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

The American National Election Studies 2007. The ANES guide to public opinion and electoral behaviour. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies. February 7, 2007. www.electionstudies.org.

Amy, Douglas 1993. Real choices, new voices. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Aristotle 350 bc [1963]. Ethica Nicomachea. In The works of Aristotle. Edited by Ross, W. D.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Australian Electoral Commission Information Center 2003. Redistributions. June 19. www.elections.act.gov.au/redis.html.

Bachrach, Peter and Baratz, Morton S. 1962. “Two faces of power.” American Political Science Review 56: 947–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bachrach, Peter and Baratz, Morton S. 1963. “Decisions and nondecisions: An analytical framework.” American Political Science Review 57: 632–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baert, Patrick 1998. Social theory in the twentieth century. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Bains, Camille 2005. “Yes side calls for government to implement STV.” The Daily Townsman May 19, 5.Google Scholar

Banducci, Susan A., Donovan, Todd, and Karp, Jeffrey A. 1999. “Proportional representation and attitudes about politics: results from New Zealand.” Electoral Studies 18: 533–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Banducci, Susan A. and Karp, Jeffrey A. 1999. “Perceptions of fairness and support for proportional representation.” Political Behavior 21: 217–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barber, Benjamin 1984. Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Barker, Fiona and McLeay, Elizabeth 2000. “How much change? An analysis of the initial impact of proportional representation on the New Zealand parliamentary party system.” Party Politics 6: 131–53.Google Scholar

Barry, Brian 2002. Culture and equality: An egalitarian critique of multiculturalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Beitz, Charles R. 1989. Political equality: An essay in democratic theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Bernstein, Richard J. 1985. Habermas and modernity. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Bianco, William 1994. Trust: Representatives and constituents. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blais, André 1991. “The debate over electoral systems.” International Political Science Review 12: 239–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blais, André, Kenneth Carty, Fred Cutler, Patrick Fournier, Richard Johnston, and Mark Warren 2005. “British Columbia electoral reform study, 2005.” BC-STV Study Frequency Table, Final Results – All Interviews, January–May 16, unpublished survey results.

Blais, André, Kenneth Carty, and Patrick Fournier 2005. “Citizens’ choice of an electoral system.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC. September 1–4.

Blais, André, Gidengil, Elisabeth, Nevitte, Neil, and Nadeau, Richard 2004. “Where does turnout decline come from?” European Journal of Political Research 43: 221–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bohman, James 2005. “Legitimate institutions for democratic renewal: Constitutional, democratic, and deliberative.” Paper presented to the Citizen-Designed Democratic Processes Workshop, Peter Wall Institute, University of British Columbia. June 10–11.

Boix, Carles 1999. “Setting the rules of the game: The choice of electoral systems in advanced democracies.” American Political Science Review 93.3: 609–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowler, Shaun and Donovan, Todd 1998. Demanding choices: Opinion, voting and direct democracy. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowler, Shaun and David Farrell 1996. “Voter strategies under preferential electoral systems.” In British elections and parties yearbook, 1995. Edited by Rallings, Colinet al., 14–31. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar

British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform 2004a. A preliminary statement to the people of British Columbia. Vancouver: British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform. March 21.

British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform 2004b. Making every vote count: The case for electoral reform in British Columbia. The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform final report. Vancouver: British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform.

British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform 2004c. Making every vote count: The case for electoral reform in British Columbia. The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform technical report. Vancouver: British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform.

British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform 2004d. “Member profiles.” In British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform member handbook. Unpublished internal document.

Brown, Mark B. 2006. “Citizen panels and the concept of representation.” Journal of Political Philosophy 14: 203–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burkhalter, Stephanie, Gastil, John and Kelshaw, Todd 2002. “A conceptual definition and theoretical model of public deliberation in small face-to-face groups.” Communication Theory 12: 398–422.Google Scholar

Cain, Bruce E., Dalton, Russell J., and Scarrow, Susan E. (eds.) 2003. Democracy transformed? Expanding political opportunities in the advanced industrial democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cain, Bruce, Ferejohn, John, and Fiorina, Morris 1987. The personal vote. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cain, Bruce E. and Kenneth P. Miller 2001. “The populist legacy: Initiatives and the undermining of representative government.” In Dangerous democracy? The battle over ballot initiatives in America. Edited by Sabato, Larry J., R. Ernst, Howard, and Larson, Bruce A., 33–62. New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Calhoun, Craig 1992. Habermas and the public sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Campbell, Anne G. 2001. “In the eye of the beholder: The single subject rule for ballot initiatives.” In The battle over citizen lawmaking. Edited by Dane Walters, M., 131–65. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar

Carruthers, The Hon. Norman H. 2003. Prince Edward Island Electoral Reform Commission Report. Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island. December 18.

Carson, Lyn and Martin, Brian 1999. Random selection in politics. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar

Carty, R. Kenneth 1981. Party and parish pump: Electoral politics in Ireland. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.Google Scholar

Chambers, Simone 1996. Reasonable democracy: Jürgen Habermas and the politics of discourse. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Chambers, Simone 2004. “Behind closed doors: Publicity, secrecy, and the quality of deliberation.” Journal of Political Philosophy 12: 389–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chambers, Simone2005. “Quantity versus quality: dilemmas of mass democracy.” Paper presented to the Citizen-Designed Democratic Processes Workshop, Peter Wall Institute, University of British Columbia. June 10–11.

Christiano, Thomas (ed.) 2002. Philosophy and democracy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Clark, Sherman 1998. “A popular critique of direct democracy.” Harvard Law Review 112: 434–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, Harold D. and Stewart, Marianne C. 1998. “The decline of parties in the minds of citizens.” Annual Review of Political Science 1: 357–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, C. and Sterba, J. 2003. Affirmative action and racial preference: A debate. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Comité Directeur sur la Réforme des Institutions Démocratiques 2003. Prenez votre place! La participation citoyenne au coeur des institutions démocratiques Québécoises. Québec City, Québec.

Commission on Legislative Democracy 2004. Final report and recommendations. Fredericton, New Brunswick. December 31.

Cooke, Maeve (ed.) 1998. On the pragmatics of communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Courtney, John C. 2001. Commissioned ridings: Designing Canada's electoral districts. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.Google Scholar

Crenson, Matthew 1971. The unpolitics of air pollution. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Cronin, Thomas E. 1999. Direct democracy: The politics of initiative, referendum, and recall. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Crosby, Ned, Kelly, Janet M., and Schaefer, Paul 1986. “Citizens panels: A new approach to citizen participation.” Public Administration Review 46: 170–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cross, William 2004. Political parties. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar

Cross, William and Young, Lisa 2004. “Political parties as membership organisations.” In Political parties, William Cross 14–32. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar

Czudnowski, Moshe 1983. “Higher education and liberalism among political elites.” In Political elites and social change: Studies of elite roles and attitudes. Edited by Czudnowski, Moshe, 15–38. DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert A. 1989. Democracy and its critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert, Shapiro, Ian, and Antonio Cheibub, José (eds.) 2003. The democracy sourcebook. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Dalton, Russell 1984. “Cognitive mobilization and partisan dealignment in advanced industrial democracies.” Journal of Politics 46: 264–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dalton, Russell 2002. Citizen politics: Public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies. 3rd Edition. New York, NY: Chatham House.Google Scholar

Dalton, Russell 2004. Democratic challenges, democratic choices: The erosion of political support in the advanced industrial democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dalton, Russell J., Bruce E. Cain, and Susan E. Scarrow 2003. “Democratic publics and democratic institutions.” In Democracy transformed? Expanding political opportunities in the advanced industrial democracies. Edited by Cain, Bruce E., Dalton, Russell J., and Scarrow, Susan E., 251–75. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Delli Carpini, Michael and Keeter, Scott 1996. What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Denemark, David 2001. “Choosing MMP in New Zealand: Explaining the 1993 electoral reform.” In Mixed-member electoral systems. Edited by Shugart, Matthew Soberg and Wattenberg, Martin P., 70–95. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Donovan, Mark 1995. “The politics of electoral reform in Italy.” International Political Science Review 16: 47–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dryzek, John S. 2005. “Deliberative democracy in divided societies.” Political Quarterly 33: 218–42.Google Scholar

Dunleavy, Patrick and Margetts, Helen 1995. “Understanding the dynamics of electoral reform.” International Political Science Review 16: 9–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunleavy, Patrick, Helen Margetts, Brendan O’Duffy, and Stuart Weir 1997. Making votes count: Replaying the 1990s general elections under alternative electoral systems. Democratic Audit Paper 11. Colchester, UK: Human Rights Centre, University of Essex.

Elections BC 2002. “Initiative to establish a proportional representation electoral system.” www.elections.bc.ca/init/i2002.html.

Elections Canada 2006. “Table 4: Voter turnout for the 2006, 2004, 2000 and 1997 general elections.” Thirty-ninth general election 2006: Official voting results. www.elections.ca/scripts/OVR2006/default.html.

Electoral Referendum Panel 1993. The referendum, the guide: Referendum ’93, what's it going to be?Wellington, NZ: Electoral Referendum Panel.

Eliasoph, Nina 1998. Avoiding politics: How Americans produce apathy in everyday life. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellsworth, Phoebe 1989. “Are twelve heads better than one?” Law and Contemporary Problems 52: 205–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elster, Jon 1998. Deliberative democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farrell, David M. 2001. Electoral systems. New York, NY: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Farrell, David and Gallagher, Michael 1999. “British voters and their criteria for evaluating electoral systems.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 1: 293–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fenno, Richard 1978. Home style. Boston, MA: Little Brown.Google Scholar

Ferejohn, John 2000. “Instituting deliberative democracy.” In Designing democratic institutions. Edited by Shapiro, Ian and Macedo, Stephen, 75–104. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Ferejohn, John and Pasquino, Pasquale 2004. “A constitutional adjudication: lessons from Europe.” University of Texas Law Review 82: 1671–704.Google Scholar

Fiorino, Daniel J. 1990. “Citizen participation and environmental risk: A survey of institutional mechanisms.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 15: 226–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fisher, Samuel and Rebekah Herrick. 2003. “Citizen legislators in the modern US House of Representatives.” Paper presented at the 2003 Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, Illinois. April 2–6.

Fishkin, James 1991. Democracy and deliberation: New directions for democratic reform. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Fishkin, James 1995. The voice of the people: Public opinion and democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Flanagan, Thomas 1995. Waiting for the wave: The Reform Party and Preston Manning. Toronto: Stoddart.Google Scholar

Frey, Bruno and Alois Stutzer. 2003. Direct democracy: Designing a living constitution. CREMA Working Paper Series 2003–05. Zurich: Centre for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts.

Fung, Archon 2003. “Recipes for public spheres: Eight institutional design choices and their consequences.” Journal of Political Philosophy 11: 338–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fung, Archon 2005. “Deliberation before the revolution: Toward an ethics of deliberative democracy in an unjust world.” Political Theory 33.3: 397–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fung, Archon2006a. “Democratizing the policy process.” In Oxford handbook of public policy. Edited by Goodin, Robert, Moran, Michael, and Rein, Martin, 669–85. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fung, Archon 2006b. “Varieties of participation in complex governance.” Public Administration Review 66.1: 66–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fung, Archon and Wright, Erik Olin 2003. Deepening democracy: Institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Garrett, Elizabeth 1997. “Who directs direct democracy?” University of Chicago Law School Roundtable 4: 17–36.Google Scholar

Garrett, Elizabeth and Elisabeth R. Gerber 2001. “Money in the initiative and referendum process.” In The battle over citizen lawmaking. Edited by Waters, M. Dane, 73–96. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar

Gastil, John 1993. Democracy in small groups. Philadelphia, PA: New Society Publishers.Google Scholar

Gastil, John 2000. By popular demand. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Gastil, John and Levine, Peter (eds.) 2005. The deliberative democracy handbook: Strategies for effective civic engagement in the twenty-first century. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Gaventa, John 1980. Power and powerlessness: Quiescence and rebellion in an Appalachian valley. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Gerber, Elisabeth R. 1996. “Legislative response to the threat of popular initiatives.” American Journal of Political Science 40: 99–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerber, Elisabeth R. 1999. The populist paradox: Interest group influence and the promise of direct legislation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Gerber, Elisabeth R., Lupia, A., McCubbins, M. D., and Kiewiet, D. R. 2001. Stealing the initiative: How state government responds to direct democracy. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Gerken, Heather (2007). “The double-edged sword of independence: Inoculating electoral reform commissions against everyday politics.” Election Law Journal 6: 184–201.Google Scholar

Gibson, Gordon 2002. Report on the constitution of the Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform. Submitted to Hon. P. Geoffrey Plant, Attorney General of British Columbia. December 23.

Gidengil, Elisabeth, Blais, André, Nevitte, Neil, and Nadeau, Richard 2004. Citizens. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar

Goodin, Robert E. 2000. “Democratic deliberation within.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 29: 81–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodin, Robert E. and Niemeyer, Simon J. 2003. “When does deliberation begin? Internal reflection versus public discussion in deliberative democracy.” Political Studies 51: 627–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gosine, Kevin 2000. “Revisiting the notion of a ‘recast’ vertical mosaic in Canada: Does a post-secondary education make a difference?” Canadian Ethnic Studies Journal 32: 89–104.Google Scholar

Government of British Columbia 2003. Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform terms of reference and duties of the Chair. Victoria, BC: Government of British Columbia. www.citizensassembly.bc.ca/resources/terms_of_reference.pdf.

Greaves, Edward F. 2004. “Municipality and community in Chile: Building imagined civic communities and its impact on the political.” Politics and Society 32: 203–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guinier, Lani 1994. The tyranny of the majority: Fundamental fairness in representative democracy. New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Gutmann, Amy 2003. Identity in democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Gutmann, Amy and Thompson, Dennis 1996. Democracy and disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Gutmann, Amy and Thompson, Dennis 2000. “Why deliberative democracy is different.” Social Philosophy and Policy 17: 161–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gutmann, Amy and Thompson, Dennis 2004. Why deliberative democracy?Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guttsman, W. L. 1974. “Elite recruitment and political leadership in Britain and Germany since 1950.” In Elites in western democracy. Edited by Crewe, Ivor, 89–125. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen 1976. Legitimation crisis. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen 1979. Communication and the evolution of society, Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen 1984. The theory of communicative action, vol. I: Reason and the rationalization of society. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen 1989a. The theory of communicative action, vol. II: Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen 1989b. Structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen 1994. “Three normative models of democracy.” Constellations: 1: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen 1996. Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Hall, Michael, Lasby, David, Gumulka, Glenn, and Tryon, Catherine 2006. Caring Canadians, involved Canadians: Highlights from the 2004 Canada Survey of Giving, Volunteering and Participating. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.Google Scholar

Hanley, Nick, Kenyon, Wendy, and Nevin, Ceara 2001. “Citizens’ juries: An aid to environmental valuation?” Environmental Planning C: Government and Policy 19: 557–66.Google Scholar

Hans, Valerie P. and Vidmar, Neil 1986. Judging the jury. New York, NY: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hansen, Kasper M. and Andersen, Vibeke Normann 2004. “Deliberative democracy and the deliberative poll on the euro.” Scandinavian Political Studies 27: 261–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hansen, Mogens Herman 1999. The Athenian democracy in the age of Demosthenes. Trans. J. A. Crook. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar

Hastie, Reid, Penrod, Steven D., and Pennington, Nancy 1983. Inside the jury. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hawke, G. R. (ed.) 1993. Changing politics?: The Electoral Referendum 1993. Wellington, NZ: Institute of Policy Studies, Victoria University of Wellington.Google Scholar

Hibbing, John R. and Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth 2001. “Process space and American politics.” American Political Science Review 95: 145–53.Google Scholar

Hibbing, John R. and Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth 2002. Stealth democracy: Americans’ beliefs about how government should work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Higley, John and Desley Deacon 1985. “The Australian national elite in the 1970s and 1980s.” In Studies of the structure of national elite groups. Edited by Moore, Gwen, 97–127. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar

Hirbour, Catherine 2005. Remarks at citizen-designed democratic processes: What can we learn from the BC Citizens’ Assembly? Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia. January 14.

Hoffmann-Lange, Ursula 1985. “Structural prerequisites of elite integration in the Federal Republic of Germany.” In Studies of the structure of national elite groups. Edited by Moore, Gwen, 45–96. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar

Hoffmann-Lange, Ursula, Helga Neumann, and Bärbek Steinkemper 1985. “Conflict and consensus among elites in the Federal Republic of Germany.” In Studies of the structure of national elite groups. Edited by Moore, Gwen, 243–83. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar

Horowitz, Donald 1985. Ethnic groups in conflict. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Horowitz, Donald 1991. A democratic South Africa. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Howe, Paul, Johnston, Richard and Blais, André 2005. Strengthening Canadian democracy. Montreal: Institute for Research on Public Policy.Google Scholar

Howlett, Karen 2005. “B.C. vote buoys hopes for electoral reform.” Toronto Globe and Mail, May 19, A10.

Hume, David 1994. “Of the independency of parliament.” In Political essays. Edited by Hakkonssen, Knud, 24–27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Inglehart, Ronald 1990. Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Inglehart, Ronald 1997. Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Irvin, Renee and Stansbury, John 2004. “Citizen participation in decision making: is it worth the effort?” Public Administration Review 64.1: 55–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

James, Michael Rabinder 2004. Deliberative democracy and the plural polity. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar

James, Michael Rabinder and Johnny Goldfinger 2005. “Rethinking social group perspective.” Paper presented at the 2005 Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, Illinois. April 7–10.

Johnston, Richard, Blais, André, Gidengil, Elisabeth, and Nevitte, Neil 1996. The challenge of direct democracy: The 1992 Canadian Referendum. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar

Johnston, Richard and Brady, Henry E. 2002. “The rolling cross-section design.” Electoral Studies 23: 283–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, Mark J. 2004. “Tough choices, eh? Dalton are you listening?” Rabble news. February 25. www.rabble.ca/in_your_own_words. shtml?sh_itm=b655f417bb841594ba80b3e20e1f5fd6&rXn=1&.

Kanji, Mebs and Bilodeau, Antoine 2006. “Value diversity and electoral reform in Canada.” PS: Political Science in Politics 39.4: 829–36.Google Scholar

Katz, Richard S. 1980. A theory of parties and electoral systems. Baltimore, MA: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Katz, Richard S.2001. “Reforming the Italian electoral law, 1993.” In Mixed-member electoral systems. Edited by Shugart, Matthew Soberg and Wattenberg, Martin P., 96–122. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kuklinski, James H. and Paul J. Quirk 2000. “Reconsidering the rational public: Cognition, heuristics, and mass opinion.” In Elements of reason. Edited by Lupia, Arthur, McCubbins, Mathew D. and Popkin, Samuel, 153–82. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kymlicka, Will 1995. Multicultural citizenship. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kymlicka, Will (ed.) 1995. The rights of minority cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kymlicka, Will and Norman, Wayne (eds.) 2000. Citizenship in diverse societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lang, Amy 2005. Remarks at citizen-designed democratic processes: What can we learn from the BC Citizens’ Assembly? Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia. January 14.

Lang, Amy 2007. “But is it for real? The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly as a model of state-sponsored citizen empowerment.” Politics & Society 35: 35–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lautard, Hugh and Neil Guppy 1999. “Revisiting the vertical mosaic: Occupational stratification among Canadian ethnic groups.” In Race and ethnic relations in Canada. Edited by Li, Peter, 219–52. 2nd Edition. Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Laver, Michael and Giannetti, Daniela 2001. “Party system dynamics and the making and breaking of Italian governments.” Electoral Studies 20: 529–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Law Commission of Canada 2004. Voting counts: Electoral reform for Canada. Ottawa: Law Commission of Canada.

Laycock, David 1990. Populism and democratic thought in the Canadian prairies. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Lee, Benjamin 1992. “Textuality, mediation, and public discourse.” In Habermas and the public sphere. Edited by Calhoun, Craig, 402–20. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Lenaghan, Jo 1999. “Involving the public in rationing decisions: The experience of citizens juries.” Health Policy 49: 45–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Levine, Stephen and Roberts, Nigel S. 1994. “The New Zealand electoral referendum and general election of 1993.” Electoral Studies 13.3: 240–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levine, Stephen and Nigel S. Roberts1997. “MMP: The decision.” In New Zealand politics in transition. Edited by Miller, Raymond, 25–36. Auckland: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lian, Jason and Matthews, David Ralph 1998. “Does the vertical mosaic still exist? Ethnicity and income in Canada, 1991.” The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 35: 461–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lijphart, Arend 1977. Democracy in plural societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Linde, Hans A. 1998a. “Taking Oregon's initiative toward a new century.” Willamette Law Review 34: 391–419.Google Scholar

Linde, Hans A. 1998b. “Practicing theory: The forgotten law of initiative lawmaking.” UCLA Law Review 45 (Aug.): 1735–60.Google Scholar

Lipset, Seymour Martin 1990. Continental divide: The values and institutions of the United States and Canada. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lukes, Steven 1974. Power: A radical view. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lupia, Arthur 1994. “Shortcuts vs. encyclopedias: Information and voting behavior in California insurance reform elections.” American Political Science Review 88: 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lupia, Arthur and Richard G. C. Johnston 2001. “Are voters to blame? Voter competence and elite manoeuvres in referendums.” In Referendum democracy: Citizens, elites, and deliberation in referendum campaigns. Edited by Mendelsohn, Matthew and Parkin, Andrew, 191–210. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lupia, Arthur and McCubbins, Mathew D. 1998. The democratic dilemma. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lupia, Arthur and Mathew D. McCubbins2000. “The institutional foundations of political competence: How citizens learn what they need to know.” In Elements of reason. Edited by Lupia, Arthur, McCubbins, Mathew D., and Popkin, Samuel, 47–66. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lupia, Arthur and Matsusaka, J. G. 2004. “Direct democracy: New approaches to old questions.” Annual Review of Political Science 7: 463–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luskin, Robert 1987. “Measuring political sophistication.” American Journal of Political Science 31: 856–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luskin, Robert, Fishkin, James, and Jowell, Roger 2002. “Considered opinions: Deliberative polling in the U.K.” British Journal of Political Science 32: 455–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacDonald, Jack 2005. Randomocracy: Why the B.C. Citizens’ Assembly recommends the single transferable-vote system. Victoria, BC: FCG Publications.Google Scholar

McConnell, Michael 2000–01. “The redistricting cases: Original mistakes and current consequences.” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 24: 103–72.Google Scholar

McKean, Margaret and Schiner, Ethan 2000. “Japan's new electoral system: La plus ça change …”Electoral Studies 19: 447–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McLean, Iain and Butler, David 1996. Fixing boundaries: Defining and redefining single-member electoral districts. Aldershot: Dartmouth.Google Scholar

McRobie, Alan (ed.) 1993. Taking it to the people?: The New Zealand electoral referendum debate. Christchurch, NZ: Hazard Press.Google Scholar

Manin, Bernard 1997. The principles of representative government. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mansbridge, Jane 1980. Beyond adversary democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Mansbridge, Jane 1999. “Should blacks represent blacks and women represent women? A contingent ‘yes’.” Journal of Politics 61 (Aug.): 628–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mansbridge, Jane 2003. “Rethinking representation.” American Political Science Review 97: 515–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mansbridge, Jane 2004. “Representation revisited: An introduction to the case against electoral accountability.” Democracy and Society 2: 12–13.Google Scholar

Mansbridge, Jane2005. “Recasting the mandate/independence controversy.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC. September 1–4.

Marsh, Michael 2000. “Candidate centered but party wrapped: Campaigning in Ireland under STV.” In Elections in Australia, Ireland, and Malta under the single transferable vote: Reflections on an embedded institution. Edited by Bowler, Shaun and Grofman, Bernard, 114–30. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matsusaka, John G. 2004. For the many or the few: The initiative process, public policy, and American democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mendelsohn, Matthew and Parkin, Andrew (eds.) 2001. Referendum democracy: Citizens, elites, and deliberation in referendum campaigns. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merkel, Daniel 1996. “Review: The National Issues Forum deliberative poll.” Public Opinion Quarterly 60: 588–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Michels, Robert 1962. Political parties: A sociological study of the oligarchical tendencies of modern democracy. Translated by Eden and Cedar Paul. New York, NY: Collier Books.Google Scholar

Miller, Charles E. 1985. “Group decision making under majority and unanimity decision rules.” Social Psychology Quarterly 48: 51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milner, Henry 2004. “First past the post? Progress report on electoral reform initiatives in Canadian provinces.” Policy Matters 5: 19–27.Google Scholar

Milner, Henry (ed.) 2004. Steps toward making every vote count: Electoral system reform in Canada and its provinces. Peterborough, Ont.: Broadview Press.Google Scholar

Moscovici, Serge and Zavalloni, Marisa 1969. “The group as a polarizer of attitudes.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 12: 125–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nagel, Jack H. 1994. “What political scientists can learn from the 1993 electoral reform in New Zealand.” PS: Political Science and Politics 27: 525–29.Google Scholar

National Conference of State Legislatures 1999. Redistricting Law 2000. Denver, Colorado. January.

Nevitte, Neil 1996. The decline of deference: Canadian value change in cross-national perspective. Peterborough, Ont.: Broadview Press.Google Scholar

Norris, Pippa 1997. “Choosing electoral systems: Majoritarian, proportional and mixed.” International Political Science Review 18: 297–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norris, Pippa 2004. Electoral engineering: Voting rules and political behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norris, Pippa(ed.) 1999. Critical citizens: Global support for democratic governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nye, Joseph S. Jr., Zelikow, Philip D., and King, David C. 1997. Why the people don’t trust government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Outhwaite, William 1994. Habermas: A critical introductionStanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Parkinson, John 2003. “Hearing voices: Negotiating representation claims in public deliberation.” European Consortium for Political Research: Edinburgh Joint Sessions Workshops, Edinburgh, Scotland. March 28–April 2.

Perra, Leo 2005. Remarks at citizen-designed democratic processes: What can we learn from the BC Citizens’ Assembly? Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia. January 14.

Pharr, Susan J. and Putnam, Robert D. (eds.) 2000. Disaffected democracies: What's troubling the trilateral countries?Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Pharr, Susan J., Putnam, Robert D., and Dalton, Russell J. 2000. “Trouble in the advanced democracies? A quarter-century of declining confidence.” Journal of Democracy 11: 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Phillips, Anne 1994. “Dealing with difference: A politics of ideas or a politics of presence?” Constellations 1: 74–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Phillips, Anne 1995. The politics of presence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pilon, Denis 2002. Renewing Canadian democracy: Citizen engagement in voting system reform. Law Commission of Canada/Fair Vote Canada, York University, Toronto. March.Google Scholar

Pineo, Peter and Porter, John 1985. “Social mobility in Canada: The current picture.” Sociological Focus 9: 109–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pitkin, Hanna 1967. The concept of representation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Porter, John A. 1965. The vertical mosaic: An analysis of social class and power in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Powell, G. Bingham 1986. “American voter turnout in comparative perspective.” American Political Science Review 80 (Mar.): 17–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pusey, Michael 1987. Jürgen Habermas. Chichester, Sussex: Ellis Horwood Limited.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Putnam, Robert 1976. The comparative study of political elites. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Putnam, Robert 1995. “Bowling alone: America's declining social capital.” Journal of Democracy 6: 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Putnam, Robert 2000. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Putnam, Robert 2001. “Civic disengagement in contemporary America.” Government and Opposition 36: 135–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rakove, Jack N. 1996. Original meanings: politics and ideas in the making of the Constitution. New York, NY: A. A. Knopf.Google Scholar

Rallings, Colin and Thrasher, Michael 1994. “The parliamentary boundary commissions: rules, interpretations and politics.” Parliamentary Affairs 47: 387–404.Google Scholar

Rana, Shan 2004. Submission to the Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform. (RANA-0058). http://demo.levelcms.com:30080/levelCMS/published/public/get_involved/submission/R/Rana-58.

Ratner, R. S. 2004. “The BC Citizens’ Assembly: The learning stage.” Canadian Parliamentary Review 27: 20–26.Google Scholar

Ratner, R. S. 2005. “The BC Citizens’ Assembly: The public hearings and deliberations stage.” Canadian Parliamentary Review 28: 24–33.Google Scholar

Rawls, John 1996. Political liberalism. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Rawls, John 1999. A theory of justice. Rev. Edn. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Ray, Larry 1993. Rethinking critical theory: Emancipation in the age of global movements. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Reed, Steven R. and Michael F. Thies 2001. “The causes of electoral reform in Japan.” In Mixed-member electoral systems: The best of both worlds? Edited by Shugart, Matthew Soberg and Wattenberg, Martin P.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Rehfeld, Andrew 2005. The concept of constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Riker, William 1982. Liberalism against populism. San Francisco, CA: Waveland Press.Google Scholar

Rostboll, Christian F. 2005. “Preferences and paternalism: On freedom and deliberative democracy.” Political Theory 33: 370–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rothschild-Whitt, Joyce 1979. “The collectivist organization: An alternative to rational-bureaucratic action.” American Sociological Review 44: 509–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques 1762 [1968]. The social contract. Translated and introduced by Maurice Cranston. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Rowe, Gene and Frewer, Lynn J. 2000. “Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 25: 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ruff, Norman J. 2004. “Electoral reform and deliberative democracy: The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly.” In Steps toward making every vote count. Edited by Milner, Henry, 235–48. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press.Google Scholar

Sabato, Larry J., Ernst, Howard R., and Larson, Bruce A. (eds.) 2001. Dangerous democracy? The battle over ballot initiatives in America. New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Sakamoto, Takayuki 1999. “Explaining electoral reform: Japan versus Italy and New Zealand.” Party Politics 5: 419–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sanders, Lynn M. 1997. “Against deliberation.” Political Theory 25: 347–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sartori, Giovanni 1987. The theory of democracy revisited, part one: The contemporary debate. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers.Google Scholar

Schumpeter, Joseph 1942. Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York, NY: Harper.Google Scholar

Shiratori, Rei 1995. “The politics of electoral reform in Japan.” International Political Science Review 16: 79–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shugart, Matthew Soberg 2001a. “Electoral ‘efficiency’ and the move to mixed-member systems.” Electoral Studies 20: 173–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shugart, Matthew Soberg2001b. “ ‘Extreme’ electoral systems and the appeal of the mixed-member alternative.” In Mixed-member electoral systems. Edited by Shugart, Matthew Soberg and Wattenberg, Martin P., 25–51. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Shugart, Matthew Soberg and Wattenberg, Martin P. (eds.) 2001. Mixed-member electoral systems. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sitton, John 2003. Habermas and contemporary society. New York, NY: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Graham 2005. Beyond the ballot: 57 democratic innovations from around the world. London: The Power Inquiry.Google Scholar

Smith, Graham and Wales, Corinne 2000. “Citizens’ juries and deliberative democracy.” Political Studies 48: 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Snyder, Anna 2003. “Critiquing consensus: an analysis of process designed for non-governmental collaboration.” Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change 24: 31–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sornig, K. 1989. “Some remarks on linguistic strategies of persuasion.” In Language, power and ideology: Studies in political discourse. Edited by Wodak, R., 95–113. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stark, Andrew. 1997. “What is a balanced committee.” In Ethnicity and group rights. Edited by Shapiro, Ian and Kymlicka, Will, 377–418. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Statistics Canada 2001a. “Experienced labour force by occupational skill group, 2001 counts for both sexes, for Canada, provinces and territories: British Columbia.” Census 2001. Catalogue Number 97F0024XIE2001008.

Statistics Canada 2001b. “Level of educational attainment for the age group 25 to 64, 2001 counts for both sexes, for Canada, provinces and territories: British Columbia.” Census 2001. Catalogue Number 97F0024XIE2001012.

Statistics Canada 2001c. “Population groups and sex for population, for Canada, provinces, territories, census metropolitan areas and census agglomerations, 2001 Census: British Columbia.” Census 2001. Catalogue Number 97F0010XCB2001004.

Statistics Canada 2001d. “Profile – British Columbia.” www12.statcan.ca/english/census01/products/standard/prprofile/prprofile.cfm?G=59.

Stephan, Mark 2004. “Citizens as representatives: bridging the democratic theory divides.” Politics and Policy 32: 118–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taagepera, Rein and Shugart, Matthew 1989. Seats and votes: The effects and determinants of electoral systems. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth and Hibbing, John R. 2005. “Citizenship and civic engagement.” Annual Review of Political Science 8: 227–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thompson, Dennis F. 2002. Just elections: Creating a fair electoral process in the United States. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Tomz, Michael, Jason Wittenberg, and Gary King 2003. CLARIFY: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results. Version 2.1. Stanford University, University of Wisconsin, and Harvard University. http://gking.harvard.edu/

Urbinati, Nadia 2006. Representative democracy: Principles and genealogy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay, and Brady, Henry 1995. Voice and equality: Civic volunteerism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Vowles, Jack 1995. “The politics of electoral reform in New Zealand.” International Political Science Review 16: 95–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vowles, Jack2006. “Systemic failure, coordination, and contingencies: Understanding electoral system change in New Zealand.” Paper presented at Plurality and Multi-Round Elections Conference, Montreal, Quebec. June 16–18.

Vowles, Jack and Aimer, Peter (eds.) 1994. Double decision: The 1993 election and referendum in New Zealand. Wellington, NZ: Dept. of Politics, Victoria University of Wellington.Google Scholar

Ward, Hugh, Norval, Aletta, Landman, Todd, and Pretty, Jules 2003. “Open citizens’ juries and the politics of sustainability.” Political Studies 51: 282–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Warren, Mark E. 1999. “Democratic theory and trust.” In Democracy and trust. Edited by Warren, Mark E., 310–45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Warren, Mark E. 2001. Democracy and association. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Warren, Mark E.2003. “A second transformation of democracy?” In New forms of democracy? The reform and transformation of democratic institutions. Edited by Cain, Bruce, Dalton, Russell, and Scarrow, Susan, 223–49. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Warren, Mark E. and Castiglione, Dario 2004. “The transformation of democratic representation.” Democracy and Society 2: 20–22.Google Scholar

Weeks, Edward C. 2000. “The practice of deliberative democracy: Results from four large-scale trials.” Public Administration Review 60: 360–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, Melissa S. 1998. Voice, trust, and memory: Marginalized groups and the failings of liberal representation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Wortley, Scott 2003. “Hidden intersections: Research on race, crime, and criminal justice in Canada.” Canadian Ethnic Studies Journal 35 (Fall): 99–117.Google Scholar

Wright, Benjamin Fletcher (ed.) 1961. The Federalist. No. 10. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Wright, Erik Olin, Andrew Levine, and Elliott Sober 1992. “Causal asymmetries.” In Reconstructing Marxism: Essays on explanation and the theory of history. Edited by Wright, Erik Olin, Levine, Andrew and Sober, Elliott, 129–76. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Young, Iris Marion 2000. Inclusion and democracy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Zaller, John 1992. The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abelson, Julia and John Eyles 2002. Public participation and citizen governance in the Canadian health system. Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada. Discussion Paper 7. Ottawa: The Commission.

Althaus, Scott 2003. Collective preferences in democratic politics: Opinion surveys and the will of the people. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

The American National Election Studies 2007. The ANES guide to public opinion and electoral behaviour. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies. February 7, 2007. www.electionstudies.org.

Amy, Douglas 1993. Real choices, new voices. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Aristotle 350 bc [1963]. Ethica Nicomachea. In The works of Aristotle. Edited by Ross, W. D.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Australian Electoral Commission Information Center 2003. Redistributions. June 19. www.elections.act.gov.au/redis.html.

Bachrach, Peter and Baratz, Morton S. 1962. “Two faces of power.” American Political Science Review 56: 947–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bachrach, Peter and Baratz, Morton S. 1963. “Decisions and nondecisions: An analytical framework.” American Political Science Review 57: 632–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baert, Patrick 1998. Social theory in the twentieth century. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Bains, Camille 2005. “Yes side calls for government to implement STV.” The Daily Townsman May 19, 5.Google Scholar

Banducci, Susan A., Donovan, Todd, and Karp, Jeffrey A. 1999. “Proportional representation and attitudes about politics: results from New Zealand.” Electoral Studies 18: 533–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Banducci, Susan A. and Karp, Jeffrey A. 1999. “Perceptions of fairness and support for proportional representation.” Political Behavior 21: 217–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barber, Benjamin 1984. Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Barker, Fiona and McLeay, Elizabeth 2000. “How much change? An analysis of the initial impact of proportional representation on the New Zealand parliamentary party system.” Party Politics 6: 131–53.Google Scholar

Barry, Brian 2002. Culture and equality: An egalitarian critique of multiculturalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Beitz, Charles R. 1989. Political equality: An essay in democratic theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Bernstein, Richard J. 1985. Habermas and modernity. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Bianco, William 1994. Trust: Representatives and constituents. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blais, André 1991. “The debate over electoral systems.” International Political Science Review 12: 239–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blais, André, Kenneth Carty, Fred Cutler, Patrick Fournier, Richard Johnston, and Mark Warren 2005. “British Columbia electoral reform study, 2005.” BC-STV Study Frequency Table, Final Results – All Interviews, January–May 16, unpublished survey results.

Blais, André, Kenneth Carty, and Patrick Fournier 2005. “Citizens’ choice of an electoral system.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC. September 1–4.

Blais, André, Gidengil, Elisabeth, Nevitte, Neil, and Nadeau, Richard 2004. “Where does turnout decline come from?” European Journal of Political Research 43: 221–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bohman, James 2005. “Legitimate institutions for democratic renewal: Constitutional, democratic, and deliberative.” Paper presented to the Citizen-Designed Democratic Processes Workshop, Peter Wall Institute, University of British Columbia. June 10–11.

Boix, Carles 1999. “Setting the rules of the game: The choice of electoral systems in advanced democracies.” American Political Science Review 93.3: 609–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowler, Shaun and Donovan, Todd 1998. Demanding choices: Opinion, voting and direct democracy. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowler, Shaun and David Farrell 1996. “Voter strategies under preferential electoral systems.” In British elections and parties yearbook, 1995. Edited by Rallings, Colinet al., 14–31. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar

British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform 2004a. A preliminary statement to the people of British Columbia. Vancouver: British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform. March 21.

British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform 2004b. Making every vote count: The case for electoral reform in British Columbia. The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform final report. Vancouver: British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform.

British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform 2004c. Making every vote count: The case for electoral reform in British Columbia. The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform technical report. Vancouver: British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform.

British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform 2004d. “Member profiles.” In British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform member handbook. Unpublished internal document.

Brown, Mark B. 2006. “Citizen panels and the concept of representation.” Journal of Political Philosophy 14: 203–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burkhalter, Stephanie, Gastil, John and Kelshaw, Todd 2002. “A conceptual definition and theoretical model of public deliberation in small face-to-face groups.” Communication Theory 12: 398–422.Google Scholar

Cain, Bruce E., Dalton, Russell J., and Scarrow, Susan E. (eds.) 2003. Democracy transformed? Expanding political opportunities in the advanced industrial democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cain, Bruce, Ferejohn, John, and Fiorina, Morris 1987. The personal vote. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cain, Bruce E. and Kenneth P. Miller 2001. “The populist legacy: Initiatives and the undermining of representative government.” In Dangerous democracy? The battle over ballot initiatives in America. Edited by Sabato, Larry J., R. Ernst, Howard, and Larson, Bruce A., 33–62. New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Calhoun, Craig 1992. Habermas and the public sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Campbell, Anne G. 2001. “In the eye of the beholder: The single subject rule for ballot initiatives.” In The battle over citizen lawmaking. Edited by Dane Walters, M., 131–65. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar

Carruthers, The Hon. Norman H. 2003. Prince Edward Island Electoral Reform Commission Report. Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island. December 18.

Carson, Lyn and Martin, Brian 1999. Random selection in politics. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar

Carty, R. Kenneth 1981. Party and parish pump: Electoral politics in Ireland. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.Google Scholar

Chambers, Simone 1996. Reasonable democracy: Jürgen Habermas and the politics of discourse. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Chambers, Simone 2004. “Behind closed doors: Publicity, secrecy, and the quality of deliberation.” Journal of Political Philosophy 12: 389–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chambers, Simone2005. “Quantity versus quality: dilemmas of mass democracy.” Paper presented to the Citizen-Designed Democratic Processes Workshop, Peter Wall Institute, University of British Columbia. June 10–11.

Christiano, Thomas (ed.) 2002. Philosophy and democracy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Clark, Sherman 1998. “A popular critique of direct democracy.” Harvard Law Review 112: 434–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, Harold D. and Stewart, Marianne C. 1998. “The decline of parties in the minds of citizens.” Annual Review of Political Science 1: 357–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, C. and Sterba, J. 2003. Affirmative action and racial preference: A debate. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Comité Directeur sur la Réforme des Institutions Démocratiques 2003. Prenez votre place! La participation citoyenne au coeur des institutions démocratiques Québécoises. Québec City, Québec.

Commission on Legislative Democracy 2004. Final report and recommendations. Fredericton, New Brunswick. December 31.

Cooke, Maeve (ed.) 1998. On the pragmatics of communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Courtney, John C. 2001. Commissioned ridings: Designing Canada's electoral districts. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.Google Scholar

Crenson, Matthew 1971. The unpolitics of air pollution. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Cronin, Thomas E. 1999. Direct democracy: The politics of initiative, referendum, and recall. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Crosby, Ned, Kelly, Janet M., and Schaefer, Paul 1986. “Citizens panels: A new approach to citizen participation.” Public Administration Review 46: 170–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cross, William 2004. Political parties. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar

Cross, William and Young, Lisa 2004. “Political parties as membership organisations.” In Political parties, William Cross 14–32. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar

Czudnowski, Moshe 1983. “Higher education and liberalism among political elites.” In Political elites and social change: Studies of elite roles and attitudes. Edited by Czudnowski, Moshe, 15–38. DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert A. 1989. Democracy and its critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert, Shapiro, Ian, and Antonio Cheibub, José (eds.) 2003. The democracy sourcebook. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Dalton, Russell 1984. “Cognitive mobilization and partisan dealignment in advanced industrial democracies.” Journal of Politics 46: 264–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dalton, Russell 2002. Citizen politics: Public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies. 3rd Edition. New York, NY: Chatham House.Google Scholar

Dalton, Russell 2004. Democratic challenges, democratic choices: The erosion of political support in the advanced industrial democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dalton, Russell J., Bruce E. Cain, and Susan E. Scarrow 2003. “Democratic publics and democratic institutions.” In Democracy transformed? Expanding political opportunities in the advanced industrial democracies. Edited by Cain, Bruce E., Dalton, Russell J., and Scarrow, Susan E., 251–75. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Delli Carpini, Michael and Keeter, Scott 1996. What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Denemark, David 2001. “Choosing MMP in New Zealand: Explaining the 1993 electoral reform.” In Mixed-member electoral systems. Edited by Shugart, Matthew Soberg and Wattenberg, Martin P., 70–95. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Donovan, Mark 1995. “The politics of electoral reform in Italy.” International Political Science Review 16: 47–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dryzek, John S. 2005. “Deliberative democracy in divided societies.” Political Quarterly 33: 218–42.Google Scholar

Dunleavy, Patrick and Margetts, Helen 1995. “Understanding the dynamics of electoral reform.” International Political Science Review 16: 9–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunleavy, Patrick, Helen Margetts, Brendan O’Duffy, and Stuart Weir 1997. Making votes count: Replaying the 1990s general elections under alternative electoral systems. Democratic Audit Paper 11. Colchester, UK: Human Rights Centre, University of Essex.

Elections BC 2002. “Initiative to establish a proportional representation electoral system.” www.elections.bc.ca/init/i2002.html.

Elections Canada 2006. “Table 4: Voter turnout for the 2006, 2004, 2000 and 1997 general elections.” Thirty-ninth general election 2006: Official voting results. www.elections.ca/scripts/OVR2006/default.html.

Electoral Referendum Panel 1993. The referendum, the guide: Referendum ’93, what's it going to be?Wellington, NZ: Electoral Referendum Panel.

Eliasoph, Nina 1998. Avoiding politics: How Americans produce apathy in everyday life. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellsworth, Phoebe 1989. “Are twelve heads better than one?” Law and Contemporary Problems 52: 205–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elster, Jon 1998. Deliberative democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farrell, David M. 2001. Electoral systems. New York, NY: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Farrell, David and Gallagher, Michael 1999. “British voters and their criteria for evaluating electoral systems.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 1: 293–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fenno, Richard 1978. Home style. Boston, MA: Little Brown.Google Scholar

Ferejohn, John 2000. “Instituting deliberative democracy.” In Designing democratic institutions. Edited by Shapiro, Ian and Macedo, Stephen, 75–104. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Ferejohn, John and Pasquino, Pasquale 2004. “A constitutional adjudication: lessons from Europe.” University of Texas Law Review 82: 1671–704.Google Scholar

Fiorino, Daniel J. 1990. “Citizen participation and environmental risk: A survey of institutional mechanisms.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 15: 226–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fisher, Samuel and Rebekah Herrick. 2003. “Citizen legislators in the modern US House of Representatives.” Paper presented at the 2003 Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, Illinois. April 2–6.

Fishkin, James 1991. Democracy and deliberation: New directions for democratic reform. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Fishkin, James 1995. The voice of the people: Public opinion and democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Flanagan, Thomas 1995. Waiting for the wave: The Reform Party and Preston Manning. Toronto: Stoddart.Google Scholar

Frey, Bruno and Alois Stutzer. 2003. Direct democracy: Designing a living constitution. CREMA Working Paper Series 2003–05. Zurich: Centre for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts.

Fung, Archon 2003. “Recipes for public spheres: Eight institutional design choices and their consequences.” Journal of Political Philosophy 11: 338–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fung, Archon 2005. “Deliberation before the revolution: Toward an ethics of deliberative democracy in an unjust world.” Political Theory 33.3: 397–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fung, Archon2006a. “Democratizing the policy process.” In Oxford handbook of public policy. Edited by Goodin, Robert, Moran, Michael, and Rein, Martin, 669–85. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fung, Archon 2006b. “Varieties of participation in complex governance.” Public Administration Review 66.1: 66–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fung, Archon and Wright, Erik Olin 2003. Deepening democracy: Institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Garrett, Elizabeth 1997. “Who directs direct democracy?” University of Chicago Law School Roundtable 4: 17–36.Google Scholar

Garrett, Elizabeth and Elisabeth R. Gerber 2001. “Money in the initiative and referendum process.” In The battle over citizen lawmaking. Edited by Waters, M. Dane, 73–96. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar

Gastil, John 1993. Democracy in small groups. Philadelphia, PA: New Society Publishers.Google Scholar

Gastil, John 2000. By popular demand. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Gastil, John and Levine, Peter (eds.) 2005. The deliberative democracy handbook: Strategies for effective civic engagement in the twenty-first century. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Gaventa, John 1980. Power and powerlessness: Quiescence and rebellion in an Appalachian valley. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Gerber, Elisabeth R. 1996. “Legislative response to the threat of popular initiatives.” American Journal of Political Science 40: 99–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerber, Elisabeth R. 1999. The populist paradox: Interest group influence and the promise of direct legislation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Gerber, Elisabeth R., Lupia, A., McCubbins, M. D., and Kiewiet, D. R. 2001. Stealing the initiative: How state government responds to direct democracy. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Gerken, Heather (2007). “The double-edged sword of independence: Inoculating electoral reform commissions against everyday politics.” Election Law Journal 6: 184–201.Google Scholar

Gibson, Gordon 2002. Report on the constitution of the Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform. Submitted to Hon. P. Geoffrey Plant, Attorney General of British Columbia. December 23.

Gidengil, Elisabeth, Blais, André, Nevitte, Neil, and Nadeau, Richard 2004. Citizens. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar

Goodin, Robert E. 2000. “Democratic deliberation within.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 29: 81–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodin, Robert E. and Niemeyer, Simon J. 2003. “When does deliberation begin? Internal reflection versus public discussion in deliberative democracy.” Political Studies 51: 627–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gosine, Kevin 2000. “Revisiting the notion of a ‘recast’ vertical mosaic in Canada: Does a post-secondary education make a difference?” Canadian Ethnic Studies Journal 32: 89–104.Google Scholar

Government of British Columbia 2003. Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform terms of reference and duties of the Chair. Victoria, BC: Government of British Columbia. www.citizensassembly.bc.ca/resources/terms_of_reference.pdf.

Greaves, Edward F. 2004. “Municipality and community in Chile: Building imagined civic communities and its impact on the political.” Politics and Society 32: 203–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guinier, Lani 1994. The tyranny of the majority: Fundamental fairness in representative democracy. New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Gutmann, Amy 2003. Identity in democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Gutmann, Amy and Thompson, Dennis 1996. Democracy and disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Gutmann, Amy and Thompson, Dennis 2000. “Why deliberative democracy is different.” Social Philosophy and Policy 17: 161–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gutmann, Amy and Thompson, Dennis 2004. Why deliberative democracy?Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guttsman, W. L. 1974. “Elite recruitment and political leadership in Britain and Germany since 1950.” In Elites in western democracy. Edited by Crewe, Ivor, 89–125. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen 1976. Legitimation crisis. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen 1979. Communication and the evolution of society, Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen 1984. The theory of communicative action, vol. I: Reason and the rationalization of society. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen 1989a. The theory of communicative action, vol. II: Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen 1989b. Structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen 1994. “Three normative models of democracy.” Constellations: 1: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen 1996. Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Hall, Michael, Lasby, David, Gumulka, Glenn, and Tryon, Catherine 2006. Caring Canadians, involved Canadians: Highlights from the 2004 Canada Survey of Giving, Volunteering and Participating. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.Google Scholar

Hanley, Nick, Kenyon, Wendy, and Nevin, Ceara 2001. “Citizens’ juries: An aid to environmental valuation?” Environmental Planning C: Government and Policy 19: 557–66.Google Scholar

Hans, Valerie P. and Vidmar, Neil 1986. Judging the jury. New York, NY: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hansen, Kasper M. and Andersen, Vibeke Normann 2004. “Deliberative democracy and the deliberative poll on the euro.” Scandinavian Political Studies 27: 261–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hansen, Mogens Herman 1999. The Athenian democracy in the age of Demosthenes. Trans. J. A. Crook. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar

Hastie, Reid, Penrod, Steven D., and Pennington, Nancy 1983. Inside the jury. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hawke, G. R. (ed.) 1993. Changing politics?: The Electoral Referendum 1993. Wellington, NZ: Institute of Policy Studies, Victoria University of Wellington.Google Scholar

Hibbing, John R. and Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth 2001. “Process space and American politics.” American Political Science Review 95: 145–53.Google Scholar

Hibbing, John R. and Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth 2002. Stealth democracy: Americans’ beliefs about how government should work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Higley, John and Desley Deacon 1985. “The Australian national elite in the 1970s and 1980s.” In Studies of the structure of national elite groups. Edited by Moore, Gwen, 97–127. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar

Hirbour, Catherine 2005. Remarks at citizen-designed democratic processes: What can we learn from the BC Citizens’ Assembly? Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia. January 14.

Hoffmann-Lange, Ursula 1985. “Structural prerequisites of elite integration in the Federal Republic of Germany.” In Studies of the structure of national elite groups. Edited by Moore, Gwen, 45–96. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar

Hoffmann-Lange, Ursula, Helga Neumann, and Bärbek Steinkemper 1985. “Conflict and consensus among elites in the Federal Republic of Germany.” In Studies of the structure of national elite groups. Edited by Moore, Gwen, 243–83. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar

Horowitz, Donald 1985. Ethnic groups in conflict. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Horowitz, Donald 1991. A democratic South Africa. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Howe, Paul, Johnston, Richard and Blais, André 2005. Strengthening Canadian democracy. Montreal: Institute for Research on Public Policy.Google Scholar

Howlett, Karen 2005. “B.C. vote buoys hopes for electoral reform.” Toronto Globe and Mail, May 19, A10.

Hume, David 1994. “Of the independency of parliament.” In Political essays. Edited by Hakkonssen, Knud, 24–27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Inglehart, Ronald 1990. Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Inglehart, Ronald 1997. Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Irvin, Renee and Stansbury, John 2004. “Citizen participation in decision making: is it worth the effort?” Public Administration Review 64.1: 55–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

James, Michael Rabinder 2004. Deliberative democracy and the plural polity. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar

James, Michael Rabinder and Johnny Goldfinger 2005. “Rethinking social group perspective.” Paper presented at the 2005 Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, Illinois. April 7–10.

Johnston, Richard, Blais, André, Gidengil, Elisabeth, and Nevitte, Neil 1996. The challenge of direct democracy: The 1992 Canadian Referendum. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar

Johnston, Richard and Brady, Henry E. 2002. “The rolling cross-section design.” Electoral Studies 23: 283–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, Mark J. 2004. “Tough choices, eh? Dalton are you listening?” Rabble news. February 25. www.rabble.ca/in_your_own_words. shtml?sh_itm=b655f417bb841594ba80b3e20e1f5fd6&rXn=1&.

Kanji, Mebs and Bilodeau, Antoine 2006. “Value diversity and electoral reform in Canada.” PS: Political Science in Politics 39.4: 829–36.Google Scholar

Katz, Richard S. 1980. A theory of parties and electoral systems. Baltimore, MA: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Katz, Richard S.2001. “Reforming the Italian electoral law, 1993.” In Mixed-member electoral systems. Edited by Shugart, Matthew Soberg and Wattenberg, Martin P., 96–122. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kuklinski, James H. and Paul J. Quirk 2000. “Reconsidering the rational public: Cognition, heuristics, and mass opinion.” In Elements of reason. Edited by Lupia, Arthur, McCubbins, Mathew D. and Popkin, Samuel, 153–82. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kymlicka, Will 1995. Multicultural citizenship. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kymlicka, Will (ed.) 1995. The rights of minority cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kymlicka, Will and Norman, Wayne (eds.) 2000. Citizenship in diverse societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lang, Amy 2005. Remarks at citizen-designed democratic processes: What can we learn from the BC Citizens’ Assembly? Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia. January 14.

Lang, Amy 2007. “But is it for real? The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly as a model of state-sponsored citizen empowerment.” Politics & Society 35: 35–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lautard, Hugh and Neil Guppy 1999. “Revisiting the vertical mosaic: Occupational stratification among Canadian ethnic groups.” In Race and ethnic relations in Canada. Edited by Li, Peter, 219–52. 2nd Edition. Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Laver, Michael and Giannetti, Daniela 2001. “Party system dynamics and the making and breaking of Italian governments.” Electoral Studies 20: 529–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Law Commission of Canada 2004. Voting counts: Electoral reform for Canada. Ottawa: Law Commission of Canada.

Laycock, David 1990. Populism and democratic thought in the Canadian prairies. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Lee, Benjamin 1992. “Textuality, mediation, and public discourse.” In Habermas and the public sphere. Edited by Calhoun, Craig, 402–20. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Lenaghan, Jo 1999. “Involving the public in rationing decisions: The experience of citizens juries.” Health Policy 49: 45–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Levine, Stephen and Roberts, Nigel S. 1994. “The New Zealand electoral referendum and general election of 1993.” Electoral Studies 13.3: 240–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levine, Stephen and Nigel S. Roberts1997. “MMP: The decision.” In New Zealand politics in transition. Edited by Miller, Raymond, 25–36. Auckland: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lian, Jason and Matthews, David Ralph 1998. “Does the vertical mosaic still exist? Ethnicity and income in Canada, 1991.” The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 35: 461–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lijphart, Arend 1977. Democracy in plural societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Linde, Hans A. 1998a. “Taking Oregon's initiative toward a new century.” Willamette Law Review 34: 391–419.Google Scholar

Linde, Hans A. 1998b. “Practicing theory: The forgotten law of initiative lawmaking.” UCLA Law Review 45 (Aug.): 1735–60.Google Scholar

Lipset, Seymour Martin 1990. Continental divide: The values and institutions of the United States and Canada. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lukes, Steven 1974. Power: A radical view. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lupia, Arthur 1994. “Shortcuts vs. encyclopedias: Information and voting behavior in California insurance reform elections.” American Political Science Review 88: 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lupia, Arthur and Richard G. C. Johnston 2001. “Are voters to blame? Voter competence and elite manoeuvres in referendums.” In Referendum democracy: Citizens, elites, and deliberation in referendum campaigns. Edited by Mendelsohn, Matthew and Parkin, Andrew, 191–210. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lupia, Arthur and McCubbins, Mathew D. 1998. The democratic dilemma. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lupia, Arthur and Mathew D. McCubbins2000. “The institutional foundations of political competence: How citizens learn what they need to know.” In Elements of reason. Edited by Lupia, Arthur, McCubbins, Mathew D., and Popkin, Samuel, 47–66. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lupia, Arthur and Matsusaka, J. G. 2004. “Direct democracy: New approaches to old questions.” Annual Review of Political Science 7: 463–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luskin, Robert 1987. “Measuring political sophistication.” American Journal of Political Science 31: 856–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luskin, Robert, Fishkin, James, and Jowell, Roger 2002. “Considered opinions: Deliberative polling in the U.K.” British Journal of Political Science 32: 455–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacDonald, Jack 2005. Randomocracy: Why the B.C. Citizens’ Assembly recommends the single transferable-vote system. Victoria, BC: FCG Publications.Google Scholar

McConnell, Michael 2000–01. “The redistricting cases: Original mistakes and current consequences.” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 24: 103–72.Google Scholar

McKean, Margaret and Schiner, Ethan 2000. “Japan's new electoral system: La plus ça change …”Electoral Studies 19: 447–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McLean, Iain and Butler, David 1996. Fixing boundaries: Defining and redefining single-member electoral districts. Aldershot: Dartmouth.Google Scholar

McRobie, Alan (ed.) 1993. Taking it to the people?: The New Zealand electoral referendum debate. Christchurch, NZ: Hazard Press.Google Scholar

Manin, Bernard 1997. The principles of representative government. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mansbridge, Jane 1980. Beyond adversary democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Mansbridge, Jane 1999. “Should blacks represent blacks and women represent women? A contingent ‘yes’.” Journal of Politics 61 (Aug.): 628–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mansbridge, Jane 2003. “Rethinking representation.” American Political Science Review 97: 515–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mansbridge, Jane 2004. “Representation revisited: An introduction to the case against electoral accountability.” Democracy and Society 2: 12–13.Google Scholar

Mansbridge, Jane2005. “Recasting the mandate/independence controversy.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC. September 1–4.

Marsh, Michael 2000. “Candidate centered but party wrapped: Campaigning in Ireland under STV.” In Elections in Australia, Ireland, and Malta under the single transferable vote: Reflections on an embedded institution. Edited by Bowler, Shaun and Grofman, Bernard, 114–30. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matsusaka, John G. 2004. For the many or the few: The initiative process, public policy, and American democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mendelsohn, Matthew and Parkin, Andrew (eds.) 2001. Referendum democracy: Citizens, elites, and deliberation in referendum campaigns. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merkel, Daniel 1996. “Review: The National Issues Forum deliberative poll.” Public Opinion Quarterly 60: 588–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Michels, Robert 1962. Political parties: A sociological study of the oligarchical tendencies of modern democracy. Translated by Eden and Cedar Paul. New York, NY: Collier Books.Google Scholar

Miller, Charles E. 1985. “Group decision making under majority and unanimity decision rules.” Social Psychology Quarterly 48: 51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milner, Henry 2004. “First past the post? Progress report on electoral reform initiatives in Canadian provinces.” Policy Matters 5: 19–27.Google Scholar

Milner, Henry (ed.) 2004. Steps toward making every vote count: Electoral system reform in Canada and its provinces. Peterborough, Ont.: Broadview Press.Google Scholar

Moscovici, Serge and Zavalloni, Marisa 1969. “The group as a polarizer of attitudes.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 12: 125–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nagel, Jack H. 1994. “What political scientists can learn from the 1993 electoral reform in New Zealand.” PS: Political Science and Politics 27: 525–29.Google Scholar

National Conference of State Legislatures 1999. Redistricting Law 2000. Denver, Colorado. January.

Nevitte, Neil 1996. The decline of deference: Canadian value change in cross-national perspective. Peterborough, Ont.: Broadview Press.Google Scholar

Norris, Pippa 1997. “Choosing electoral systems: Majoritarian, proportional and mixed.” International Political Science Review 18: 297–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norris, Pippa 2004. Electoral engineering: Voting rules and political behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norris, Pippa(ed.) 1999. Critical citizens: Global support for democratic governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nye, Joseph S. Jr., Zelikow, Philip D., and King, David C. 1997. Why the people don’t trust government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Outhwaite, William 1994. Habermas: A critical introductionStanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Parkinson, John 2003. “Hearing voices: Negotiating representation claims in public deliberation.” European Consortium for Political Research: Edinburgh Joint Sessions Workshops, Edinburgh, Scotland. March 28–April 2.

Perra, Leo 2005. Remarks at citizen-designed democratic processes: What can we learn from the BC Citizens’ Assembly? Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia. January 14.

Pharr, Susan J. and Putnam, Robert D. (eds.) 2000. Disaffected democracies: What's troubling the trilateral countries?Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Pharr, Susan J., Putnam, Robert D., and Dalton, Russell J. 2000. “Trouble in the advanced democracies? A quarter-century of declining confidence.” Journal of Democracy 11: 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Phillips, Anne 1994. “Dealing with difference: A politics of ideas or a politics of presence?” Constellations 1: 74–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Phillips, Anne 1995. The politics of presence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pilon, Denis 2002. Renewing Canadian democracy: Citizen engagement in voting system reform. Law Commission of Canada/Fair Vote Canada, York University, Toronto. March.Google Scholar

Pineo, Peter and Porter, John 1985. “Social mobility in Canada: The current picture.” Sociological Focus 9: 109–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pitkin, Hanna 1967. The concept of representation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Porter, John A. 1965. The vertical mosaic: An analysis of social class and power in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Powell, G. Bingham 1986. “American voter turnout in comparative perspective.” American Political Science Review 80 (Mar.): 17–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pusey, Michael 1987. Jürgen Habermas. Chichester, Sussex: Ellis Horwood Limited.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Putnam, Robert 1976. The comparative study of political elites. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Putnam, Robert 1995. “Bowling alone: America's declining social capital.” Journal of Democracy 6: 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Putnam, Robert 2000. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Putnam, Robert 2001. “Civic disengagement in contemporary America.” Government and Opposition 36: 135–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rakove, Jack N. 1996. Original meanings: politics and ideas in the making of the Constitution. New York, NY: A. A. Knopf.Google Scholar

Rallings, Colin and Thrasher, Michael 1994. “The parliamentary boundary commissions: rules, interpretations and politics.” Parliamentary Affairs 47: 387–404.Google Scholar

Rana, Shan 2004. Submission to the Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform. (RANA-0058). http://demo.levelcms.com:30080/levelCMS/published/public/get_involved/submission/R/Rana-58.

Ratner, R. S. 2004. “The BC Citizens’ Assembly: The learning stage.” Canadian Parliamentary Review 27: 20–26.Google Scholar

Ratner, R. S. 2005. “The BC Citizens’ Assembly: The public hearings and deliberations stage.” Canadian Parliamentary Review 28: 24–33.Google Scholar

Rawls, John 1996. Political liberalism. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Rawls, John 1999. A theory of justice. Rev. Edn. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Ray, Larry 1993. Rethinking critical theory: Emancipation in the age of global movements. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Reed, Steven R. and Michael F. Thies 2001. “The causes of electoral reform in Japan.” In Mixed-member electoral systems: The best of both worlds? Edited by Shugart, Matthew Soberg and Wattenberg, Martin P.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Rehfeld, Andrew 2005. The concept of constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Riker, William 1982. Liberalism against populism. San Francisco, CA: Waveland Press.Google Scholar

Rostboll, Christian F. 2005. “Preferences and paternalism: On freedom and deliberative democracy.” Political Theory 33: 370–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rothschild-Whitt, Joyce 1979. “The collectivist organization: An alternative to rational-bureaucratic action.” American Sociological Review 44: 509–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques 1762 [1968]. The social contract. Translated and introduced by Maurice Cranston. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Rowe, Gene and Frewer, Lynn J. 2000. “Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 25: 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ruff, Norman J. 2004. “Electoral reform and deliberative democracy: The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly.” In Steps toward making every vote count. Edited by Milner, Henry, 235–48. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press.Google Scholar

Sabato, Larry J., Ernst, Howard R., and Larson, Bruce A. (eds.) 2001. Dangerous democracy? The battle over ballot initiatives in America. New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Sakamoto, Takayuki 1999. “Explaining electoral reform: Japan versus Italy and New Zealand.” Party Politics 5: 419–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sanders, Lynn M. 1997. “Against deliberation.” Political Theory 25: 347–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sartori, Giovanni 1987. The theory of democracy revisited, part one: The contemporary debate. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers.Google Scholar

Schumpeter, Joseph 1942. Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York, NY: Harper.Google Scholar

Shiratori, Rei 1995. “The politics of electoral reform in Japan.” International Political Science Review 16: 79–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shugart, Matthew Soberg 2001a. “Electoral ‘efficiency’ and the move to mixed-member systems.” Electoral Studies 20: 173–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shugart, Matthew Soberg2001b. “ ‘Extreme’ electoral systems and the appeal of the mixed-member alternative.” In Mixed-member electoral systems. Edited by Shugart, Matthew Soberg and Wattenberg, Martin P., 25–51. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Shugart, Matthew Soberg and Wattenberg, Martin P. (eds.) 2001. Mixed-member electoral systems. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sitton, John 2003. Habermas and contemporary society. New York, NY: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Graham 2005. Beyond the ballot: 57 democratic innovations from around the world. London: The Power Inquiry.Google Scholar

Smith, Graham and Wales, Corinne 2000. “Citizens’ juries and deliberative democracy.” Political Studies 48: 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Snyder, Anna 2003. “Critiquing consensus: an analysis of process designed for non-governmental collaboration.” Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change 24: 31–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sornig, K. 1989. “Some remarks on linguistic strategies of persuasion.” In Language, power and ideology: Studies in political discourse. Edited by Wodak, R., 95–113. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stark, Andrew. 1997. “What is a balanced committee.” In Ethnicity and group rights. Edited by Shapiro, Ian and Kymlicka, Will, 377–418. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Statistics Canada 2001a. “Experienced labour force by occupational skill group, 2001 counts for both sexes, for Canada, provinces and territories: British Columbia.” Census 2001. Catalogue Number 97F0024XIE2001008.

Statistics Canada 2001b. “Level of educational attainment for the age group 25 to 64, 2001 counts for both sexes, for Canada, provinces and territories: British Columbia.” Census 2001. Catalogue Number 97F0024XIE2001012.

Statistics Canada 2001c. “Population groups and sex for population, for Canada, provinces, territories, census metropolitan areas and census agglomerations, 2001 Census: British Columbia.” Census 2001. Catalogue Number 97F0010XCB2001004.

Statistics Canada 2001d. “Profile – British Columbia.” www12.statcan.ca/english/census01/products/standard/prprofile/prprofile.cfm?G=59.

Stephan, Mark 2004. “Citizens as representatives: bridging the democratic theory divides.” Politics and Policy 32: 118–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taagepera, Rein and Shugart, Matthew 1989. Seats and votes: The effects and determinants of electoral systems. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth and Hibbing, John R. 2005. “Citizenship and civic engagement.” Annual Review of Political Science 8: 227–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thompson, Dennis F. 2002. Just elections: Creating a fair electoral process in the United States. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Tomz, Michael, Jason Wittenberg, and Gary King 2003. CLARIFY: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results. Version 2.1. Stanford University, University of Wisconsin, and Harvard University. http://gking.harvard.edu/

Urbinati, Nadia 2006. Representative democracy: Principles and genealogy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay, and Brady, Henry 1995. Voice and equality: Civic volunteerism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Vowles, Jack 1995. “The politics of electoral reform in New Zealand.” International Political Science Review 16: 95–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vowles, Jack2006. “Systemic failure, coordination, and contingencies: Understanding electoral system change in New Zealand.” Paper presented at Plurality and Multi-Round Elections Conference, Montreal, Quebec. June 16–18.

Vowles, Jack and Aimer, Peter (eds.) 1994. Double decision: The 1993 election and referendum in New Zealand. Wellington, NZ: Dept. of Politics, Victoria University of Wellington.Google Scholar

Ward, Hugh, Norval, Aletta, Landman, Todd, and Pretty, Jules 2003. “Open citizens’ juries and the politics of sustainability.” Political Studies 51: 282–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Warren, Mark E. 1999. “Democratic theory and trust.” In Democracy and trust. Edited by Warren, Mark E., 310–45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Warren, Mark E. 2001. Democracy and association. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Warren, Mark E.2003. “A second transformation of democracy?” In New forms of democracy? The reform and transformation of democratic institutions. Edited by Cain, Bruce, Dalton, Russell, and Scarrow, Susan, 223–49. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar