An Exploration of Community in a Knowledge Forum Classroom

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511805080.012

8 - An Exploration of Community in a Knowledge Forum Classroom

An Activity System Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012

Edited by

Rob Kling and

Jim Hewitt: Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Sasha Barab: Affiliation:
Indiana University
Rob Kling: Affiliation:
Indiana University
James H. Gray: Affiliation:
SRI International, Stanford, California

Book contents

Get access

Summary

The past two decades have witnessed a remarkable transformation in the theoretical landscape of educational research. Classical in-the-head conceptions of thinking and learning are now sharing the epistemic spotlight with the sociocultural and sociohistorical theories of Vygotsky, Leont'ev, and Luria (Kuutti, 1996). These new perspectives argue that learning is fundamentally a social activity, inextricably tied to participation in communal practices (Lave & Wenger, 1991; Rogoff, Baker-Sennett, Lacasa, & Goldsmith, 1995). Accordingly, there has been a growing interest in the notion of community in educational circles, and the ways in which social groupings can be designed to advance individual and collective cognitions.

Like any theory of learning, sociocultural perspectives are susceptible to misinterpretation and oversimplification. The notion that development “is a process of participation in sociocultural activities” (Rogoff et al., 1995, p. 45) offers a new way of thinking about cognition and meaning, but it can also lead to unwarranted optimism regarding the educational efficacy of community-based strategies. While sociocultural theory has been widely interpreted as a call for framing pedagogies around social engagement, it would be a mistake to assume that any form of group activity will yield desirable educational outcomes. The word community is popularly (and sometimes erroneously) applied to a broad range of social organizations, from informal Internet chat rooms to carefully crafted models of classroom activity (e.g., CTGV, 1992; Brown & Campione, 1990; Riel, 1992; Scardamalia, Bereiter, McLean, Swallow, & Woodruff, 1989). Clearly, some kinds of community engagement offer more educational promise than others.

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning , pp. 210 - 238

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805080.012 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Barab, S. A., & Duffy, T. (2000). From practice fields to communities of practice. In D. Jonassen & S. M. Land (Eds.). Theoretical Foundations of Learning Environments (pp. 25–56). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

Barab, S. A., & Kirshner, D. (2001). Methodologies for capturing learner practices occurring as part of dynamic learning environments. The Journal of The Learning Sciences, 10(1&2), 5–15CrossRef Google Scholar

Barab, S., MaKinster, J., & Scheckler, R. (this volume). Characterizing an online professional development community

Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1989). Intentional learning as a goal of instruction. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.). Knowing, Learning and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 361–392). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

Bereiter, C., Scardamalia, M., Cassells, C., & Hewitt, J. (1997). Postmodernism, knowledge building, and elementary science. The Elementary School Journal, 97(4), 329–340CrossRef Google Scholar

Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1990). Communities of learning and thinking, or a context by any other name. Human Development, 21, 108–125Google Scholar

Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32–42CrossRef Google Scholar

Bruckman, A. (this volume). Co-evolution of technological design and pedagogy in an online learning community

Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1992). Technology and the design of generative learning environments. In T. Duffy and D. Jonassen (eds.). Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction: A Conversation (pp. 77–89). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.). Knowing, Learning and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., & Peck, C. (2002). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 813–836CrossRef Google Scholar

Derry, S., Seymour, J., Steinkuehler, C., & Lee, J., & Siegel, M. (this volume). From ambitious vision to partially satisfying reality: An evolving socio-technical design supporting community and collaborative learning in teacher education

Elmore, R. (1996). Getting to scale with good educational practice. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 1–26CrossRef Google Scholar

Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding. Helsinki: Orienta-konsultit

Engeström, Y. (1990). Learning, working and imagining: Twelve studies in activity theory. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit Oy

Engeström, Y. (1993). Developmental studies of work as a testbench of activity theory: The case of primary care medical practice. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.). Understanding Practice: Perspectives on Activity and Context (pp. 64–103). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University PressCrossRef

Fosnot, C. T. (1989). Enquiring Teachers Enquiring Learners. A Constructivist Approach to Teaching. New York: Teacher's College Press

Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.). Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 105–117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications

Hewitt, J. (2002). From a focus on tasks to a focus on understanding: The cultural transformation of a Toronto classroom. In T. D. Koschmann and N. Myake (Eds.). Computer Supported Cooperative Learning Volume 2: Carrying forward the conversation (pp. 11–41). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

Hewitt, J., & Scardamalia, M. (1998). Design principles for distributed knowledge building processes. Educational Psychology Review, 10(1), 75–96CrossRef Google Scholar

Jonassen, D. H., & Rohrer-Murphy, L. (1999). Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments. Educational Technology: Research and Development, 47(1), 61–79Google Scholar

Kling, R., & Courtright, C. (this volume). Group behavior and learning in electronic forums: A socio-technical approach

Kuutti, K. (1996). Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer research. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.). Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 17–44). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Lave, J. (1993). Situating learning in communities of practice. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.). Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition (pp. 17–36). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. New York: Cambridge University Press

Lewis, R. (1997). An Activity Theory framework to explore distributed communities. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 13, 210–218CrossRef Google Scholar

Riel, M. (1992). A functional analysis of educational telecomputing: A case study of learning circles. Interactive Learning Environments, 2(1), 15–29CrossRef Google Scholar

Riel, M., & Polin, L. (this volume). Online learning communities

Rogoff, B. (1997). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In J. Wertsch, P. del Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.). Sociocultural Studies of the Mind (pp. 139–164). New York: Cambridge University Press

Rogoff, B., Baker-Sennett, J., Lacasa, P., & Goldsmith, D. (1995). Development through participation in sociocultural activity. New Directions for Child Development, 67, 45–65CrossRef Google Scholar

Salomon, G. (1995). Real Individuals in Complex Environments: A New Conception of Educational Psychology. Draft Document

Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1993). Computer Support for Knowledge-Building Communities. Draft Document

Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265–283CrossRef Google Scholar

Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1996). Adaptation and understanding: A case for new cultures of schooling. In S. Vosniadou, E. DeCorte, R. Glaser, and H. Mandl (Eds.). International Perspectives on the Design of Technology-Supported Learning Environments (pp. 149–163). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., Brett, C., Burtis, P. J., Calhoun, C., & Smith Lea, N. (1992). Educational applications of a networked communal database. Interactive Learning Environments, 2(1), 45–71CrossRef Google Scholar

Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., McLean, R., Swallow, J., & Woodruff, E. (1989). Computer-supported intentional learning environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5(1), 51–68CrossRef Google Scholar

Schlager, M., & Fusco, J. (this volume). Teacher professional development, technology, and communities of practice

Vaillancourt, D. (2002). Exploration of an online networking innovation with women entrepreneurs: A case study. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto

Wells, G. (1994, April). Discourse as a tool in the activity of learning and teaching. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA

Wenger, E. (1998). Communites of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.