Introduction

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511805080.005

1 - Introduction

Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012

Rob Kling and

Edited by

Rob Kling and

Sasha A. Barab: Affiliation:
Indiana University
Rob Kling: Affiliation:
Indiana University
James H. Gray: Affiliation:
SRI International
Sasha Barab: Affiliation:
Indiana University
Rob Kling: Affiliation:
Indiana University
James H. Gray: Affiliation:
SRI International, Stanford, California

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Currently, numerous educators and policy makers are advocating a move away from teacher-centered models of instruction and toward more learner-centered and community-based models. However, at present the word “community” is at risk of losing its meaning. We have little appreciation and few criteria for distinguishing between a community of learners and a group of students learning collaboratively (Barab & Duffy, 2000; Grossman, Wineburg, & Woolworth, 2000; Wineburg & Grossman, 1998). Given the proliferation of terms such as communities of learners, discourse communities, learning communities, knowledge-building communities, school communities, and communities of practice, it is clear that

community has become an obligatory appendage to every educational innovation. Yet aside from linguistic kinship, it is not clear what features, if any, are shared across terms. This confusion is most pronounced in the ubiquitous “virtual community,” where, by paying a fee or typing a password, anyone who visits a web site automatically becomes a “member” of the community … Groups of people become community, or so it would seem, by the flourish of a researcher's pen.

(Grossman, Wineburg, & Woolworth, 2000, p. 2, italics in original)

Too little of the education literature provides clear criteria for what does and does not constitute community; the term is too often employed as a slogan rather than as an analytical category. We also know little about the educational value of employing a community model for supporting learning.

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning , pp. 3 - 15

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805080.005 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Barab, S. A., & Duffy, T. (2000). From practice fields to communities of practice. In D. Jonassen & S. M. Land (Eds.), Theoretical Foundations of Learning Environments (pp. 25–56). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum

Becker, H. (1984). Art Worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press

Bellah, R. N., Madson, N., Sullivan, W. M., Swidler, A., & Tipton, S. M. (1985). Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life. Berkeley: University of California Press

Bradsher, M., & Hogan, L. (1995). The Kids Network: Student scientists pool resources. Educational Leadership, 53 (Oct.), 38–43Google Scholar

Brown, A., Ash, D., Rutherford, M., Nakagawa, K., Gordon, A. & Campione, J. (1994). Distributed expertise in the classroom. In M. D. Cohen & L. S. Sproull (Eds.), Organizational Learning (pp. 188–228). London: SAGE Publications

Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1990). Communities of learning and thinking, or a context by any other name. Contributions to Human Development, 21, 108–126CrossRef Google Scholar

Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities of practice: Toward a unifying view of working, learning, and innovation. In M. D. Cohen & L. S. Sproull (Eds.), Organizational Learning (pp. 59–82). London: SAGE PublicationsCrossRef

Geertz, C. (1983). From the native's point of view: On the nature of anthropological understanding. In C. Geertz (Ed.), Local Knowledge (pp. 55–70). New York: Basic Books

Grossman, P., Wineburg, S., and Woolworth, S. (May, 2000). In pursuit of teacher community. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans

Herring, S., Sluder, K., Scheckler, R., and Barab, S. (2002). Searching for safety online: Managing “trolling” on a feminist bulletin board. The Information Society 18 (5) 371–384CrossRef Google Scholar

Jackson, M. (Ed.). (1996). Things as They Are: New Directions in Phenomenological Anthropology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press

Kim, A. J. (2000). Community Building: Secret Strategies for Successful Online Communities on the Web. Berkeley, CA: Peachpit Press

Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics, and Culture in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Lave, J. (1993). Situating learning in communities of practice. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition (pp. 17–36). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association

Lave J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. New York: Cambridge University Press

Lemke, J. (1997). Cognition, context, and learning: A social semiotic perspective. In D. Kirshner & J. A. Whitson (Eds.), Situated Cognition: Social, Semiotic, and Psychological Perspectives (pp. 37–56). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum

Lipman, M. (1988). Philosophy Goes to School. Philadelphia: Temple University Press

Preece, J. (2000). Online communities: Designing usability, supporting sociability. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons

Putnam, R. (2001). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Touchstone Books

Quartz, K. H. (1995). Sustaining new educational communities: Toward a new culture of school reform. In J. Oakes & K. H. Quartz (Eds.), Creating New Educational Communities (ninety-fourth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part 1, pp. 240–254). Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context. New York: Oxford University Press

Roth, W.-M. (1998). Designing Communities. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers

Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1993). Technologies for knowledge-building discourse. Communications of the ACM, 36, 37–41CrossRef Google Scholar

Sergiovanni, T. J. (1994). Building Community in Schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass

Shaffer, C. R., & Anundsen, K. (1993). Creating Community Anywhere: Finding Support and Connection in a Fragmented World. Los Angeles: Tarcher/Perigee

Sproull, L. & Kiesler, S. (1986). Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 32 (11): 1492–1512CrossRef Google Scholar

Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Tanner, L. N. (1997). Dewey's Laboratory School: Lessons for Today. New York: Teachers College Press

Traweek, S. (1988). Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Wellman, B. (1999). Networks in the Global Village: Life in Contemporary Communities. Boulder, CO: Westview Press

Wellman, B., & Gulia, M. (1999). Net surfers don't ride alone. In B. Wellman (Ed.), Networks in the Global Village (pp. 331–366). Boulder, CO: Westview Press

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business School Press

Wineburg, S., & Grossman, P. (1998). Creating a community of learners among high school teachers. Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 350–353Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.