Practitioners' beliefs about deception

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511490071.010

10 - Practitioners' beliefs about deception

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2009

Leif A. Strömwall ,

Pär Anders Granhag and

Maria Hartwig

Edited by

Pär Anders Granhag and

Leif A. Strömwall

Show author details

Leif A. Strömwall: Affiliation:
Researcher at the Department of Psychology Göteborg University
Pär Anders Granhag: Affiliation:
Göteborg University, Sweden
Maria Hartwig: Affiliation:
Göteborg University, Sweden
Pär Anders Granhag: Affiliation:
Göteborgs Universitet, Sweden
Leif A. Strömwall: Affiliation:
Göteborgs Universitet, Sweden

Book contents

Get access

Summary

The aim of this chapter is to provide an overview of research on beliefs about deception – especially practitioners' beliefs. Specifically, we will outline which beliefs on deception professionals hold and compare these with what is known about actual (objective) differences between liars and truth-tellers. Then we will discuss how these beliefs have arisen, why they survive, how they spread, and to what they might lead. Finally, we will suggest how one might come to terms with misconceptions and false beliefs.

In the present chapter we define belief as a (strong or weak) feeling or conviction that something is true or real. The beliefs that a person holds, irrespective of whether these are correct or not, are often reflected in his or her behavioural disposition (Eichenbaum and Bodkin, 2000). Since beliefs often guide action, it is important to study people's beliefs about deception in order to learn more about why people fail and succeed in their endeavour to catch lies.

In the deception literature, there are an abundance of studies on deception detection accuracy. Many studies report low accuracy in human lie detection (Kraut, 1980; Vrij, 2000). The most commonly given reason for the low accuracy is that there is a mismatch between what actually is indicative of deception and what people believe is indicative of deception (Vrij, 2000).

Beliefs about deception

How does one find out people's beliefs about deception?

Type: Chapter
Information: The Detection of Deception in Forensic Contexts , pp. 229 - 250

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490071.010 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Allwood, C. M., and Granhag, P. A. (1999). Feelings of confidence and the realism of confidence judgements in everyday life. In P. Juslin and H. Montgomery (eds.), Judgement and decision making: Neo-Brunswikian and process-tracing approaches (123–46). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum

Ainsworth, P. B. (1995). Psychology and policing in a changing world. Chichester: Wiley

Akehurst, L., Köhnken, G., Vrij, A., and Bull, R. (1996). Laypersons' and police officers' beliefs regarding deceptive behaviour. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 461–713.0.CO;2-2>CrossRef Google Scholar

Anderson, D. E., DePaulo, B. M., Ansfield, M. E., Tickle, J. J., and Green, E. (1999). Beliefs about cues to deception: Mindless stereotypes or untapped wisdom?Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 23, 67–89CrossRef Google Scholar

Cooper, J., Kelly, K. A., and Weaver, K. (2004). Attitudes, norms, and social groups. In M. B. Brewer and M. Hewstone (eds.), Social Cognition (pp. 244–67). Oxford: Blackwell

DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., and Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74–118CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

DePaulo, B. M., and Pfeifer, R. L. (1986). On-the-job experience and skill at detecting deception. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 249–67CrossRef Google Scholar

DeTurck, M., Harszlak, J., Bodhorn, D., and Texter, L. (1990). The effects of training social perceivers to detect deception from behavioural cues. Communication Quarterly, 38, 189–99CrossRef Google Scholar

Eichenbaum, H., and Bodkin, J. A. (2000). Belief and knowledge as distinct forms of memory. In D. L. Schacter and E. Scaryy (eds). Memory, brain, and belief (pp. 176–207). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Einhorn, H. J. (1982). Learning from experience and suboptimal rules in decision making. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, and A. Tversky (eds.), Judgement under uncertainty: heuristics and biases (pp. 268–83). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef

Ekman, P. (2001). Telling lies: Clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics and marriage. New York: Norton

Ekman, P., O'Sullivan, M. (1991). Who can catch a liar?American Psychologist, 46, 913–20CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ekman, P., and O'Sullivan, M., and Frank, M. G. (1999). A few can catch a liar. Psychological Science, 10, 263–6CrossRef Google Scholar

Frank, M. G., and Feeley, T. H. (2003). To catch a liar: Challenges for research in lie detection training. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 31, 58–75CrossRef Google Scholar

Fraser, C., and Gaskell, G. (1990). The social psychological study of widespread beliefs. Oxford. Clarendon Press

Gilovich, T. (1991). How we know what isn't so: The fallibility of human reason in everyday life. New York: Free Press

Gilovich, T., Vallone, R., and Tversky, A. (1985). The hot hand in basketball: On the misperception of random sequences. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 295–314CrossRef Google Scholar

Gordon, N. J., and Fleisher, W. L. (2002). Effective interviewing and interrogation techniques. London: Academic Press

Granhag, P. A., Andersson, L. O., Strömwall, L. A., and Hartwig, M. (2004). Imprisoned knowledge: Criminals' beliefs about deception. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 9, 103–19CrossRef Google Scholar

Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. A., and Hartwig, M. (in press). Granting asylum or not? Migration Board personnel's beliefs on deception. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies

Greuel, L. (1992). Police officers' beliefs about cues associated with deception in rape cases. In F. Lösel, D. Bender, and T. Bliesener (eds.), Psychology and Law – International Perspectives (pp. 234–9). Berlin: Walter de GruyterCrossRef

Gudjonsson, G. H. (2003). The psychology of interrogations and confessions: A handbook. Chichester: Wiley

Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. A., and Andersson, L. O. (2004). Suspicious minds: Criminals' ability to detect deception. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 10, 83–95CrossRef Google Scholar

Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. A., and Vrij, A. (2004). Deception detection via strategic disclosure of evidence. Manuscript submitted for publication

Hess, J. E. (1997). Interviewing and interrogation for law enforcement. Cincinnati: Anderson Publishing

Hogarth, R. M. (2001). Educating intuition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Inbau, F. E., Reid, J. E., and Buckley, J. P. (1986). Criminal interrogation and confessions. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins

Inbau, F. E., Reid, J. E., Buckley, J. P., and Jayne, B. C. (2001). Criminal interrogation and confessions. Gaithersburg: Aspen Publishers

Kassin, S. M., and Fong, C. T. (1999). ‘I'm innocent!’: Effects of training on judgments of truth and deception in the interrogation room. Law and Human Behaviour, 23, 499–516CrossRef Google Scholar

Köhnken, G. (1987). Training police officers to detect deceptive eyewitness statements. Does it work?Social Behaviour, 2, 1–17Google Scholar

Kraut, R. E. (1980). Humans as lie detectors. Some second thoughts. Journal of Communication, 30, 209–16CrossRef Google Scholar

Kraut, R. E., and Poe, D. (1980). Behavioral roots of person perception: The deception judgements of customs inspectors and laymen. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 784–98CrossRef Google Scholar

Lord, C. G., Ross, L., and Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098–109CrossRef Google Scholar

Macdonald, J. M., and Michaud, D. L. (1992). Criminal interrogation. Denver: Apache Press

Mann, S., Vrij, A., and Bull, R. (2004). Detecting true lies: Police officers' ability to detect suspects' lies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 137–49CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Masip, J., and Garrido, E. (2001, June). Experienced and novice officers' beliefs about indicators of deception. Paper presented at the 11th European Conference of Psychology and Law, Lisbon, Portugal

Miller, G. R., and Stiff, J. B. (1993). Deceptive communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage

Nevid, J. S. (2003). Psychology: Concepts and applications. Boston: Houghton Mifflin

Nisbett, R. E., and Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–59CrossRef Google Scholar

Norwick, R. J., Kassin, S. M., Meissner, C. A., and Malpass, R. A. (2002, March). ‘I'd know a false confession if I saw one’: A comparative study of college students and police investigators. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the American Psychology–Law Society in Austin, Texas

Porter, S., Woodworth, M., and Birt, A. R. (2000). Truth, lies and videotapes: An investigation of the ability of federal parole officers to detect deception. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 643–58CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Rabon, D. (1992). Interviewing and interrogation. Durham: Carolina Academic Press

Snyder, M., and Cantor, N. (1979). Testing hypotheses about other people: The use of historical knowledge. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 330–42CrossRef Google Scholar

Strömwall, L. A., and Granhag, P. A. (2003). How to detect deception? Arresting the beliefs of police officers, prosecutors and judges. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 9, 19–36CrossRef Google Scholar

Strömwall, L. A., Hartwig, M., and Granhag, P. A. (2004). To act truthfully: Nonverbal behavior during a police interview. Manuscript submitted for publication

Taylor, R., and Vrij, A. (2001). The effects of varying stake and cognitive complexity on the beliefs about the cues to deception. International Journal of Police Science and Management, 3, 111–23Google Scholar

Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (2002). Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgements. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, and D. Kahneman (eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgement (pp. 19–48). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef

Victory, P. (2002). Justice and truth: The Guildford Four and the Maguire Seven. London: Sinclair-Stevenson

Vrij, A. (1993). Credibility judgements of detectives: The impact of non-verbal behavior, social skills and physical characteristics on impression formation. Journal of Social Psychology, 133, 601–11CrossRef Google Scholar

Vrij, A. (2000). Detecting lies and deceit. The psychology of lying and the implications for professional practice. Chichester: John Wiley

Vrij, A. (2003). We will protect your wife and child, but only if you confess. In P. J. van Koppen and S. D. Penrod (eds.), Adversarial versus inquisitorial justice: Psychological perspectives on criminal justice systems (pp. 55–79). New York, NJ: Kluwer AcademicCrossRef

Vrij, A., and Graham, S. (1997). Individual differences between liars and the ability to detect lies. Expert Evidence: The International Digest of Human Behaviour, Science and Law, 5, 144–8CrossRef Google Scholar

Vrij, A., and Mann, S. (2001a). Telling and detecting lies in a high-stake situation: The case of a convicted murderer. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 187–2033.0.CO;2-A>CrossRef Google Scholar

Vrij, A., and Mann, S. (2001b). Who killed my relative? Police officers' ability to detect real-life high-stake lies. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 7, 119–32CrossRef Google Scholar

Vrij, A., and Semin, G. R. (1996). Lie experts' beliefs about nonverbal indicators of deception. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 20, 65–80CrossRef Google Scholar

Vrij, A., and Taylor, R. (2003). Police officers' and students' beliefs about telling and detecting trivial and serious lies. International Journal of Police Science and Management, 5, 1–9Google Scholar

Wagenaar, W. A., van Koppen, P. J., and Crombag, H. F. M. (1993). Anchored narratives. The psychology of criminal evidence. New York: St Martin's Press

Walker, C., and Starmer, K. (eds.). (1999). Miscarriages of justice: A review of justice in error. London: Blackstone Press

Zuckerman, M., DePaulo, B. M., and Rosenthal, R. (1981). Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 1–59CrossRef Google Scholar

Zuckerman, M., Koestner, R., and Driver, R. (1981). Beliefs about cues associated with deception. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 6, 105–14CrossRef Google Scholar

Zulawski, D. E., and Wicklander, D. E. (1993). Practical aspects of interview and interrogation. Boca Raton: CRC Press