Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T11:57:48.265Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Educational Tracking Within and Between Schools: From First Grade Through Middle School and Beyond

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 September 2009

By
Doris R. Entwisle ,
Karl L. Alexander  and
Linda Steffel Olson
Edited by
Aletha C. Huston  and
Marika N. Ripke
Doris R. Entwisle
Affiliation:
Research Professor of Sociology, Johns Hopkins University
Karl L. Alexander
Affiliation:
John Dewey Professor of Sociology, Johns Hopkins University
Linda Steffel Olson
Affiliation:
Associate Research Scientist in the Department of Sociology, Johns Hopkins University
Aletha C. Huston
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
Marika N. Ripke
Affiliation:
University of Hawaii, Manoa
Get access

Summary

To clarify the role of schools in reproducing social stratification, sociologists have focused mainly on high schools, especially curriculum tracking (see e.g., Gamoran & Mare, 1989; Gamoran, 1992). These practices have become less standard over the past two decades (Lucas, 1999), but they are still much in evidence in the United States (Kao & Thompson, 2003). Generally, tracking studies examine curriculum or course-taking differences within schools, comparing high- versus low-ability group placements (Gamoran, 1992; Hallinan, 1992; Stevenson, Schiller, & Schneider, 1994). Even so, family SES, which predicts tracks within schools, also predicts tracks between schools because the availability and quality of high-level programs vary from school to school, even in the same system (Spade, Columba, & Vanfossen, 1997), and family SES of students predicts this availability (Jones, Vanfossen, & Ensminger, 1995; Spade et al., 1997). Aside from comparisons of public and parochial schools, however, research on effects of between-school tracking is thin.

Ability-group tracking is found in a large majority of U.S. middle schools as well (Braddock, 1990), but research on tracking in middle schools is much less extensive than in high schools, (e.g., Cairns, Cairns, & Neckerman 1989; Eccles, Midgley, & Adler, 1984; Eccles et al., 1993; Feldman & Elliott, 1990; Reynolds, 1992; Simmons & Blyth, 1987). Still, it is in middle school that many students first experience formal tracking, a key organizational change for them (Braddock, Wu, & McPartland 1988; Hoffer, 1992, 1994).

Type
Chapter
Information
Developmental Contexts in Middle Childhood
Bridges to Adolescence and Adulthood
 , pp. 173 - 197
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, K. L., Cook, M. A., & McDill, E. L. (1978). Curriculum tracking and educational stratification. American Sociological Review, 43(1), 47–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, K. L., & Entwisle, D. R. (1988). Achievement in the first two years of school: Patterns and processes. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 53(2, Serial No. 218).CrossRef
Alexander, K. L., & Entwisle, D. R. (1996). Educational tracking during the early years: First grade placements and middle school constraints. In Kerckhoff, A. C. (Ed.), Generating social stratification: Toward a new research agenda (pp. 83–113). New York: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, K. L., Entwisle, D. R., & Dauber, S. L. (2003). On the success of failure: A reassessment of the effects of retention in the primary grades (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, K. L., Entwisle, D. R., & Horsey, C. (1997). From first grade forward: Early foundations of high school dropout. Sociology of Education, 70(2), 87–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, K. L., Entwisle, D. R., & Kabbani, N. (2001). The dropout process in life course perspective: Early risk factors at home and school. Teachers College Record, 103(5), 760–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, K. L., Entwisle, D. R., & Kabbani, N. (2002). Dropout in relation to grade retention: An accounting from the Beginning School Study. In Can unlike children learn together?New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Baker, D. P., & Stevenson, D. L. (1986). Mothers' strategies for children's school achievement: Managing the transition to high school. Sociology of Education, 59(3), 156–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baltimore City Public Schools. (1988, February). School profiles: School year 1987–88. Baltimore, MD: Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction.
Barr, R., & Dreeben, R. (1983). How schools work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Becker, H. (1987). Addressing the needs of different groups of early adolescents (Report No. 16). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University, Center for Research on Elementary and Middle Schools.Google Scholar
Bianchi, S. M. (1984). Children's progress through school: A research note. Sociology of Education, 57(3), 184–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braddock, J. (1990). Tracking the middle grades: National patterns of grouping for instruction. Phi Delta Kappan, 71, 445–449.Google Scholar
Braddock, J. H. II, Wu, S. C., & McPartland, J. (1988). School organization in the middle grades: National variations and effects (Report No. 24). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University, Center for Research on Elementary and Middle Schools.Google Scholar
Brooks-Gunn, J., Guo, G., & Furstenberg, F. F. Jr. (1993). Who drops out and who continues beyond high school? A 20-year follow-up of black urban youth. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 3(3), 271–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairns, R. B., Cairns, B. D., & Neckerman, H. J. (1989). Early school dropout: Configurations and determinants. Child Development, 60(6), 1437–1452.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
California Achievement Test. (1979). California Achievement Tests: Norms tables, level 18, forms C and D. Monterey, CA: CTB/McGraw Hill.
Catsambis, S. (1992, March). The many faces of tracking middle school grades: Between- and within-school differentiation of students and resources. Paper presented at the Society for Research on Adolescence meeting, Washington, DC.
Chen, Z., & Kaplan, H. B. (2003). School failure in early adolescence and status attainment in middle adulthood: A longitudinal study. Sociology of Education, 76, 110–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crosby, O. (2002–03). Associate degree: Two years to a career or a jump start to a bachelor's degree. Occupational Outlook Quarterly, 46(4), 2–13.Google Scholar
Dauber, S. L., Alexander, K. L., & Entwisle, D. R. (1996). Tracking and transitions through the middle grades: Channeling educational trajectories. Sociology of Education, 69(4), 290–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, G. J., Brooks-Gunn, J., Yeung, W. J., & Smith, J. K. (1998). How much does childhood poverty affect the life chances of children?American Sociological Review, 63(3), 406–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., & Adler, T. (1984). Grade-related changes in the school environment: Effects on achievement motivation. In Nicholls, J. G. (Ed.), The development of achievement motivation (pp. 283–331). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C. M., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C.. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents' experience in school and families. American Psychologist, 48, 90–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ensminger, M. E., & Slusarcick, A. L. (1992). Paths to high school graduation or dropout: A longitudinal study of a first-grade cohort. Sociology of Education, 65(2), 95–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Entwisle, D. R., & Alexander, K. L. (1988). Factors affecting achievement test scores and marks received by black and white first graders. The Elementary School Journal, 88(5), 449–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Entwisle, D. R., & Alexander, K. L. (1993). Entry into schools: The beginning school transition and educational stratification in the United States. In Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 19 (pp. 401–423). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews, Inc.Google Scholar
Entwisle, D. R., Alexander, K. L., Cadigan, D., & Pallas, A. M. (1987). Kindergarten experience: Cognitive effects or socialization?American Educational Research Journal, 24(3), 337–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Entwisle, D. R., Alexander, K. L., & Olson, L. S. (1997). Children, schools, and inequality. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Entwisle, D. R., Alexander, K. L., & Olson, L. S. (2004). Temporary as compared to permanent dropout. Social Forces, 82(3), 1181–1205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Entwisle, D. R., Alexander, K. L., Pallas, A. M., & Cadigan, D. (1988). A social psychological model of the schooling process over first grade. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51(3), 173–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Entwisle, D. R., & Hayduk, L. A. (1978). Too great expectations: The academic outlook of young children. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Entwisle, D. R., & Hayduk, L. A. (1982). Early schooling: Cognitive and affective outcomes. Baltimore, MD: Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Entwisle, D. R., & Hayduk, L. A. (1988). Lasting effects of elementary school. Sociology of Education, 61(3), 147–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, R., & Goldthorpe, J. H. (2002). Intergenerational inequality: A sociological perspective. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(3), 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, S. S., & Elliott, G. R. (1990). At the threshold: The developing adolescent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Finn, J. D., & Cox, D. (1992). Participation and withdrawal among fourth-grade pupils. American Educational Research Journal, 29(1), 141–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuligni, A. J., Eccles, J. S., & Barber, B. L. (1995). The long-term effects of seventh-grade ability grouping in mathematics. Journal of Early Adolescence, 15(1), 58–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamoran, A. (1992). Access to excellence: Assignment to honors English classes in the transition to high school. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(3), 185–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamoran, A., & Berends, M. (1987). The effects of stratification in secondary schools: Synthesis of survey and ethnographic research. Review of Educational Research, 57(4), 415–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamoran, A., & Mare, R. D. (1989). Secondary school tracking and educational inequality: Compensation, reinforcement, or neutrality?American Journal of Sociology, 94(5), 1146–1183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garnier, H. E., Stein, J. A., & Jacobs, J. K. (1997). The process of dropping out of high school: A 19-year perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 34(2), 395–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallinan, M. T. (1992). The organization of students for instruction in the middle school. Sociology of Education, 65(2), 114–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Hauser, R. M. (2001). Should we end social promotion? Truth and consequences. In Orfield, G. & Kornhaber, M. (Eds.), Raising standards or raising barriers? Inequality and high stakes testing in public education (pp. 151–178). New York: Century Foundation.Google Scholar
Hoffer, T. B. (1992). Middle school ability grouping and student achievement in science and mathematics. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(3), 205–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffer, T. B. (1994, August). Cumulative effects of secondary school tracking on student achievement. Paper presented at the American Sociological Association meeting, Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
Ingels, S. J., Curtin, T. R., Kaufman, P., Alt, M. N., & Chen, X. (2002). Coming of age in the 1990s: The eighth grade class of 1988. Education Statistics Quarterly, 4(2) 1–12.Google Scholar
Jones, J. D., Vanfossen, B. E., & Ensminger, M. E. (1995). Individual and organizational predictors of high school track placement. Sociology of Education, 68(4), 287–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kao, G., & Thompson, J. S. (2003). Racial and ethnic stratification in educational achievement and attainment. In Cook, K. & Hagen, J. (Eds.), Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 29 (pp. 417–442). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.Google Scholar
Kerckhoff, A. C. (1993). Diverging pathways: Social structure and career deflections. New York: Cambridge Press.Google Scholar
Lareau, A. (1987). Social class differences in family-school relationships: The importance of cultural capital. Sociology of Education, 60(2), 73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazar, I., & Darlington, R. (1982). Lasting effects of early education: A report from the Consortium for Longitudinal Studies. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 47(2–3), ⁸ix–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeTendre, G. K., Hofer, B. K., & Shimizu, H. (2003). What is tracking? Cultural expectations in the United States, Germany, and Japan. American Education Research Journal, 40, 43–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, S. R. (1999). Tracking inequality: Stratification and mobility in American high schools. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Murnane, R. J., Willett, J. B., & Levy, F. (1995). The growing importance of cognitive skills in wage determination. Review of Economics and Statistics, 77(2), 251–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakes, J. (1988). Tracking in mathematics and science education: A structural contribution to unequal schooling. In Weis, L. (Ed.), Class, race, and gender in American education (pp. 106–125). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Oakes, J. (1989/90). Opportunities, achievement, and choice: Women and minority students in science and mathematics. Review of Research in Education, 16(2), 153–222.Google Scholar
Peterson, S. E., DeGracie, J. S., & Ayabe, C. R. (1987). A longitudinal study of the effects of retention/promotion on academic achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 27(1), 107–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, A. J. (1992). Grade retention and school adjustment: An explanatory analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(2), 101–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roderick, M. (1993). The path to dropping out: Evidence for intervention. Westport, CN: Auburn House.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, J. E. (2001). Beyond college for all: Career paths for the forgotten half. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, J. E. (1976). Making inequality: The hidden curriculum of high school tracking. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Shepard, L. A., & Smith, M. L. (1989). Flunking grades: Research and policies on retention. London: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Simmons, R. G., & Blyth, D. A. (1987). Moving into adolescence: The impact of pubertal change and school context. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Spade, J. Z., Columba, L., & Vanfossen, B. E. (1997). Tracking in mathematics and science: Courses and course selection procedures. Sociology of Education, 70, 108–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, D. L., Schiller, K. S., & Schneider, B. (1994). Sequences of opportunities for learning. Sociology of Education, 67(3), 184–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroup, A. L., & Robins, L. N. (1972). Elementary school predictors of high school dropout among black males. Sociology of Education, 45(2), 212–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau. (1983). Census of population: 1980 Vol 1. Characteristics of the population. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
U.S. Department of Education. (2001). Digest of education statistics, 2000 (NCES 2001-034). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
U.S. Department of Education. (2003). The condition of education 2003 (NCES 2003-067). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Zill, N. (1996). Family change and student achievement: What we have learned, what it means for schools. In Booth, A. & Dunn, J. F. (Eds.), Family-school links: How do they affect educational outcomes? (pp. 139–174). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×