Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T14:41:20.165Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Exfoliative Pulmonary Cytology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2021

Ji-Weon Park
Affiliation:
Rush University, Chicago
Paolo Gattuso
Affiliation:
Rush University, Chicago
Vijaya B. Reddy
Affiliation:
Rush University, Chicago
Shahla Masood
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Get access

Summary

Consists mostly of mucus admixed with cellular and noncellular elements

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Agusti, C, Xaubet, A, Monton, C, et al. Induced sputum in the diagnosis of peripheral lung cancer not possible endoscopically. Respir Med 2001; 95(10): 822828.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bechtel, JJ, Kelley, WR, Petty, TL, et al. Outcome of 51 patients with roentgenographically occult lung cancer detected by sputum cytologic testing: a community hospital program. Arch Intern Med 1994; 154(9): 975980.Google Scholar
Erozan, YS, Frost, JK. Cytopathologic diagnosis of lung cancer. Sem Oncol 1974; 1(3): 191198.Google ScholarPubMed
Koss, LG, Melamed, MR, Goodner, JT. Pulmonary cytology: a brief survey of diagnostic results from July 1st, 1952 until December 31st, 1960. Acta Cytol 1964; 8: 104113.Google ScholarPubMed
Matsuda, M, Horai, T, Doi, O, et al. Diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the lung by sputum cytology: with special reference to correlation of diagnostic accuracy with size and proximal extent of resected tumor. Diagn Cytopathol 1990; 6(4): 248251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, EK, van Hof, MA, Laurini, RN, Vooijs, PG. Sputum cytology by the Saccomanno method in diagnosing lung malignancyDiagn Cytopathol 1985; 1(4): 286290.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Bibbo, M, Fennessy, JJ, Lu, CT, et al. Bronchial brushing technique for the cytologic diagnosis of peripheral lung lesions: a review of 693 cases. Acta Cytol 1973; 17(3): 245251.Google Scholar
Daniele, RP, Elias, JA, Epstein, PE, Rossman, MD. Bronchoalveolar lavage: role in the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of interstitial lung disease. Ann Intern Med 1985; 102(1): 93108.Google Scholar
DeFine, LA, Saleba, KP, Gibson, BB, et al. Cytologic evaluation of bronchoalveolar lavage specimens in immunosuppressed patients with suspected opportunistic infections. Act Cytol 1987; 31(3): 235242.Google Scholar
De Gracia, J, Bravo, C, Miravitlles, M, et al. Diagnostic value of bronchoalveolar lavage in peripheral lung cancer. Am Rev Respir Dis 1993; 147(3): 649652.Google Scholar
Garg, S, Handa, U, Mohan, H, Janmeja, AK. Comparative analysis of various cytohistological techniques in diagnosis of lung diseases. Diagn Cytopathol 2007: 35(1): 2631.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jewell, J. Diagnostic value and cost effectiveness of bronchial brushings in the diagnosis of bronchial malignancies. Cytopathology 2005; 16(1): 5253.Google Scholar
Johnston, WW, Bossen, EH. Ten years of respiratory cytopathology at Duke University Medical Center II. The cytopathologic diagnosis of lung cancer during the years 1970–1974, with a comparison between cytopathology and histopathology in the typing of lung cancer. Acta Cytol 1981; 25(5): 499505.Google Scholar
Linder, J, Radio, SJ, Robbins, RA, et al. Bronchoalveolar lavage in the cytologic diagnosis of carcinoma of the lung. Acta Cytol 1987; 31(6): 796801.Google Scholar
Peikert, T, Rana, S, Edell, ES. Safety, diagnostic yield, and therapeutic implications of flexible bronchoscopy in patients with febrile neutropenia and pulmonary infiltrates. Mayo Clin Proc 2005; 80(11): 14141420.Google Scholar
Solomon, DA, Solliday, NH, Gracey, DR. Cytology in fiberoptic bronchoscopy: comparison of bronchial brushing, washing, and post-bronchoscopy sputum. Chest 1974; 65(6): 616619.Google Scholar
Stanley, MW, Henry-Stanley, MJ, Iber, C. Bronchoalveolar Lavage: Cytology and Clinical Applications. New York: Igaku-Shoin Medical Publishers Inc, 1991: 5057.Google Scholar
Berman, JJ, Murray, RJ, Lopez-Plaza, IM. Widespread post-tracheostomy atypia simulating squamous cell carcinoma: A case report. Acta Cytol 1991; 35(6): 713716.Google Scholar
Cahan, WG, Melamed, MR, Frazell, EL. Tracheobronchial cytology after laryngectomy for carcinoma. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1966; 123(1): 1521.Google Scholar
Nasiell, M. Metaplastic and atypical metaplasia in the bronchial epithelium: a histopathologic and cytopathologic study. Acta Cytol 1966; 10(6): 421427.Google Scholar
Nunez, V, Melamed, M, Cahan, W. Tracheo-bronchial cytology after laryngectomy for carcinoma of larynx II. Acta Cytol 1966; 10(1): 3848.Google Scholar
Nasiell, M. The general appearance of the bronchial epithelium in bronchial carcinoma: a histopathological study with some cytological viewpoints. Acta Cytol 1963; 7: 97106.Google Scholar
Saito, Y, Imai, T, Sato, M, Ota, S, et al. Cytologic study of tissue repair in human bronchial epithelium. Acta Cytol 1988; 32(5): 622628.Google Scholar
Laucirica, R, Ostrowski, ML. Cytology of nonneoplastic occupational and environmental diseases of the lung and pleura. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2007; 131(11): 17001708.Google Scholar
Grefte, MMJ, Salet-Van de Pol, MRJ, Gemmink, JH, et al. Quantitation of Ki-67 expression in the differential diagnosis of reserve cell hyperplasia vs. small cell lung carcinoma. Acta Cytol 2004; 48(5): 608612.Google Scholar
Sheikh, HA, Fuhrer, K, Cieply, K, Yousem, S. p63 expression in assessment of bronchioalveolar proliferations of the lung. Mod Pathol 2004; 17(9): 11341140.Google Scholar
Bedrossian, CWM, Delly, LV. Cytopathology of non-neoplastic pulmonary disease. Lab Med 1983; 14: 8695.Google Scholar
Crapanzano, JP, Zakowski, MF. Diagnostic dilemmas in pulmonary cytology. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2001; 93(6): 364375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grotte, D, Stanley, MW. Swanson, PE, et al. Reactive type II pneumocytes in bronchoalveolar lavages fluid from adult distress syndrome can be mistaken for cells of adenocarcinoma. Diagn Cytopathol 1990; 6(5): 317322.Google Scholar
Johnston, W. Cytologic diagnosis of lung cancer: Principles and problems. Pathol Res Pract 1986; 181(1): 136.Google Scholar
Johnston, WW. Type II pneumocytes in cytologic specimens: a diagnostic dilemma. Am J Clin Pathol 1992; 97(5): 608609.Google Scholar
Naryshkin, S, Young, NA. Respiratory cytology: a review of non-neoplastic mimics of malignancy. Diagn Cytopathol 1993; 9(1): 8997.Google Scholar
Naylor, B, Railey, C. A pitfall in the cytodiagnosis of sputum of asthmatics. J Clin Pathol 1964; 17: 8489.Google Scholar
Naylor, B. The shedding of the mucosa of the bronchial tree in asthma. Thorax 1962; 17: 6972.Google Scholar
Stanley, MW, Henry-Stanley, M, Gajl-Peczalska, KJ, Bitterman, PB. Hyperplasia of type II pneumocytes in acute lung injury: cytologic findings of sequential bronchoalveolar lavage. Am J Clin Pathol 1992; 97(5): 669677.Google Scholar
Thivolet-Béjui, F. Cytological pitfalls in bronchopulmonary tumors. Diag Cytopathol 1997; 17(6): 412416.Google Scholar
Yazdy, AM, Tomashefski, JF, Yagan, R, Kleinerman, J. Regional alveolar damage (RAD): A localized counterpart to diffuse alveolar damage. Am J Clin Pathol 1989; 92(1): 1015.Google Scholar
Zaman, SS, Van Hoeven, KH, Slott, S, Gupta, PK. Distinction between bronchioloalveolar carcinoma and hyperplastic pulmonary proliferations: a cytologic and morphometric analysis. Diagn Cytopathol 1997; 16(5): 396401.Google Scholar
Chalon, J, Tang, CK, Gorstein, F, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic significance of tracheobronchial epithelial multinucleation. Acta Cytol 1978; 22(5): 316320.Google Scholar
Copeland, AR, O’Toole, K, Chadburn, A, Greenbaum, E. Megakaryocytes in bronchial brush cytology. A case report. Acta Cytol 1993; 37(3): 400442.Google Scholar
Costabel, U, Matthys, H, Guzman, J, Freudenberg, N. Multinucleated cells in bronchoalveolar lavage. Acta Cytol 1985; 29(2): 189190.Google Scholar
Hector, MF. Sputum cytology in two cases of Wegener’s granulomatosis. J Clin Pathol 1976; 29(3): 259263.Google Scholar
Kim, CC, Saleba, K, Baughman, RP, et al. Iron staining on bronchoalveolar lavage smears for detecting occult pulmonary hemorrhage: Is it reliable? Acta Cytol 1989; 33(5): 716.Google Scholar
Michael, CW, Flint, A. The cytologic features of Wegener’s granulomatosis. Am J Clin Pathol 1998; 110(1): 1015.Google Scholar
Nasiell, M, Roger, V, Nasiell, K, Enstad, I, et al. Cytologic findings indicating pulmonary tuberculosis: the diagnostic significance of epithelioid cells and Langerhans giant cells found in sputum or bronchial secretions. Acta Cytol 1972; 16(2): 146151.Google Scholar
Tabatowski, K, Roggli, VL, Fulkerson, WJ, et al. Giant cell interstitial pneumonia in a hard-metal worker: cytologic-histologic and analytical electron microscopic investigation. Acta Cytol 1988; 32(2): 240246.Google Scholar
Valincenti, FJ, McMaster, KR, Daniell, C. Sputum cytology of giant cell interstitial pneumonia. Act Cytol 1979; 23: 217221.Google Scholar
Michael, CW, Richardson, PH, Boudreaux, CW. Pulmonary lymphoma of the mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue type: report of a case with cytological, histological, immunophenotypical correlation, and review of the literature. Ann Diagn Pathol 2005; 9(3): 148152.Google Scholar
Tassoni, EM. Pools of lymphocyte: significance in pulmonary secretions. Acta Cytol 1963; 7: 168173.Google Scholar
Bornstein, J, Stinson-Carter, T, Kaufman, RH. Cruschmann’s spiral in an endocervical brushing. Acta Cytol 1987; 31(4): 530532.Google Scholar
Frost, JK, Gupta, PK, Erozan, YS, Carter, D, et al. Pulmonary cytologic alterations in toxic environmental inhalation. Human Pathol 1973; 4(4): 521536.Google Scholar
Novak, PM, Kumar, NB, Naylor, B. Cruschmann’s spirals in cervicovaginal smears: prevalence, morphology, significance and origin. Acta Cytol 1984; 28(1): 58.Google Scholar
Walker, KR, Fullmer, CD. Progress on study of respiratory spirals. Acta Cytol 1970; 14(7): 396398.Google Scholar
Chen, KT. Cytology of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Diagn Cytopathol 1993; 9(1): 8285.Google Scholar
Sakula, A. Charcot-Leyden crystals and Cruschmann’s spirals in asthmatic sputum. Thorax 1986; 41(7): 503507.Google Scholar
Michael, CW, Naylor, B. Amyloid in cytologic specimens: differential diagnosis and diagnostic pitfalls. Acta Cytol 1999; 43(5): 746755.Google Scholar
Yamanouchi, H, Yoshinouchi, T, Watanabe, R, et al. Immunohistochemical study of a patient with diffuse pulmonary corpora amylacea detected by open lung biopsy. Case Reports. Intern Med 1999; 38(11): 900903.Google Scholar
Schmitz, B, Pfitzer, P. Acellular bodies in sputum. Acta Cytol 1985; 28(2): 118125.Google Scholar
DeMay, RM. Exfoliative respiratory cytology. In: DeMay, RM, ed. The Art and Science of Cytopathology, Exfoliative Cytology, 1st edn. Chicago, IL: ASCP, 1996; 218.Google Scholar
Unterman, DH, Reingold, IM. The occurrence of psammoma bodies in papillary adenocarcinoma of the lung. Am J Clin Pathol 1972; 57(3): 297302.Google Scholar
Mariotta, S, Ricci, A, Papale, M, et al. Pulmonary alveolar microlithiasis: report on 576 cases published in the literature. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis 2004; 21(3): 173181.Google Scholar
Greenberg, SD. Cytopathology of asbestos-associated pulmonary disease. Diagn Cytopathol 1985; 1(3): 177182.Google Scholar
Roggli, VL. Asbestos bodies and nonasbestos ferruginous bodies. In: Roggli, VL, Greenberg, SD, Pratt, PC, eds. Pathology of Asbestos-Associated Diseases. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company, 1992: 3975.Google Scholar
Roggli, VL, Coin, PG, MacIntyre, NR, Bell, DV. Asbestos content of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid: a comparison of light and scanning electron microscopic analysis. Acta Cytol 1994; 38(4): 502510.Google Scholar
Roggli, VL, Piantadosi, CA, Bell, DY. Asbestos bodies in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid: a study of 20 asbestos-exposed individuals and comparison to patients with other chronic interstitial lung disease. Acta Cytol 1986; 30(5): 470476.Google Scholar
Vathesatogkit, P, Harkin, TJ, Addrizzo-Harris, DJ, et al. Clinical correlation of asbestos bodies in BAL fluid. Chest 2004; 126(3): 966971.Google Scholar
DeMay, RM. Exfoliative respiratory cytology. In: DeMay, RM, ed. The Art and Science of Cytopathology, Exfoliative Cytology, 1st edn. Chicago, IL: ASCP, 1996: 218.Google Scholar
Shales, DM, Lederman, M, Chemielewski, R, et al. Elastin fibers in the sputum of patients with necrotizing pneumonia. Chest 1983; 83(6): 885889.Google Scholar
Bonfield, TL, John, N, Malur, A, et al. Elevated monocyte chemotactic proteins 1, 2, and 3 in pulmonary alveolar proteinosis are associated with chemokine receptor suppression. Clin Immunol 2005; 114(1): 7985.Google Scholar
Burkhalter, A, Silverman, JF, Hopkins, MB 3rd, Geisinger, KR. Bronchoalveolar lavage cytology in pulmonary alveolar proteinosis. Am J Clin Pathol 1996; 106(4): 504510.Google Scholar
Crocker, HL, Pfitzner, J, Doyle, IR, et al. Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis: Two contrasting cases. Eur J 2000; 15(2): 426429.Google Scholar
Mermolia, M, Rott, T, Debeljak, A. Cytology of bronchoalveolar lavage in some rare pulmonary disorders: Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis and amiodarone toxicity. Cytopathology 1994; 5(1): 916.Google Scholar
Michael, CW, Naylor, B. Amyloid in cytologic specimens: Differential diagnosis and diagnostic pitfalls. Acta Cytol 1999; 43(5): 746755.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shah, PL, Hansell, D, Lawson, PR, et al. Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis: Clinical aspects and current concepts on pathogenesis. Thorax 2000; 55(1): 6777.Google Scholar
Sosolik, SC, Gammon, RR, Julius, CJ, Ayers, LW. Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis: a report of two cases with diagnostic features in bronchoalveolar lavage specimens. Acta Cytol 1998; 42(2): 377383.Google Scholar
Bonfield, TL, John, N, Malur, A, et al. Elevated monocyte chemotactic proteins 1, 2, and 3 in pulmonary alveolar proteinosis are associated with chemokine receptor suppression. Clin Immunol 2005; 114(1): 7985.Google Scholar
Burkhalter, A, Silverman, JF, Hopkins, MB 3rd, Geisinger, KR. Bronchoalveolar lavage cytology in pulmonary alveolar proteinosis. Am J Clin Pathol 1996; 106(4): 504510.Google Scholar
Crocker, HL, Pfitzner, J, Doyle, IR, et al. Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis: Two contrasting cases. Eur J 2000; 15(2): 426429.Google Scholar
Mermolia, M, Rott, T, Debeljak, A. Cytology of bronchoalveolar lavage in some rare pulmonary disorders: Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis and amiodarone toxicity. Cytopathology 1994; 5(1): 916.Google Scholar
Michael, CW, Naylor, B. Amyloid in cytologic specimens: Differential diagnosis and diagnostic pitfalls. Acta Cytol 1999; 43(5): 746755.Google Scholar
Shah, PL, Hansell, D, Lawson, PR, et al. Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis: Clinical aspects and current concepts on pathogenesis. Thorax 2000; 55(1): 6777.Google Scholar
Sosolik, SC, Gammon, RR, Julius, CJ, Ayers, LW. Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis: a report of two cases with diagnostic features in bronchoalveolar lavage specimens. Acta Cytol 1998; 42(2): 377383.Google Scholar
Scoggins, WG, Smith, RH, Frable, WJ, O’Donohue, WJ. False positive cytological diagnosis of lung carcinoma in patients with pulmonary infarcts. Ann Thorac Surg 1977; 24(5): 474480.Google Scholar
Ohori, NP. Epithelial cell atypia in bronchoalveolar lavage specimens from lung transplant recipients. Am J Clin Pathol 1999; 112(2): 204210.Google Scholar
Selvaggi, SM. Bronchoalveolar lavage in lung transplant patients. Acta Cytol 1992; 36(5): 674679.Google Scholar
Shennib, HL, Serrick, AG, Giaid, A. Altered nonspecific lymphocyte cytotoxicity in bronchoalveolar lavage of lung transplant recipients: Can it be used in monitoring rejection or infection? Transplantation 1996; 62: 12621267.Google Scholar
Snell, GI, Levvy, BJ, Zheng, L, et al. Evermolius alters the bronchoalveolar lavage and endobronchial biopsy immunologic profile posthuman lung transplant. Am J Transplant 2005; 5(6): 14461451.Google Scholar
Toroke, AH, Bewig, B, Haverich, A. Bronchoalveolar lavage in lung transplantation: state of the art. Clin Transplant 1999; 13(2): 131157.Google Scholar
Ward, C, Snell, GI, Zheng, L, et al. Endobronchial biopsy and bronchoalveolar lavage in stable lung transplant recipients and chronic rejection. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 158(1): 8491.Google Scholar
Collins, KA, Geisinger, LR, Wagner, PH, et al. The cytologic evaluation of lipid-laden alveolar macrophages as an indicator of aspiration pneumonia in young children. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1995; 119(3): 229231.Google Scholar
Colombo, JL, Hallberg, TK. Pulmonary aspiration and lipid-laden macrophages: in search of gold (standards). Pediatr Pulmonol 1999; 28(2): 7982.Google Scholar
Corwin, RW, Irwin, RS. The lipid-laden alveolar macrophages as a marker of aspiration in parenchymal lung diseaseAm Rev Respir Dis 1985; 132(3): 576–581.Google Scholar
Cullen, MR, Balmes, JR, Robins, JM, Smith, GJ. Lipoid pneumonia caused by oil mist exposure from a steel rolling tandem mill. Am J Ind Med 1981; 2(1): 5158.Google Scholar
Knauer-Fisher, S, Ratjen, F. Lipid-laden macrophages in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid as a marker for pulmonary aspiration. Pediatr Pulmonol 1999; 27(6): 419422.Google Scholar
Nicholson, AG, Wells, AU, Hooper, J, et al. Successful treatment of endogenous lipoid pneumonia due to Niemann-Pick type B disease with whole-lung lavage. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002; 165(1): 128131.Google Scholar
Bentz, JS, Carroll, K, Ward, JH, et al. Acid-fast-positive Legionella pneumophila: a possible pitfall in the cytologic diagnosis of mycobacterial infection in pulmonary specimens. Diagn Cytopathol 2000; 22(1): 4548.Google Scholar
Greco, S, Marruchella, A, Massari, M, Saltini, C. Predictive value of BAL cellular analysis in differentiating pulmonary tuberculosis and sarcoidosis. Eur Respir J 2005; 26(2): 360361.Google Scholar
Jafari, C, Ernst, M, Kalsdorf, JM Jr, et al. Rapid diagnosis of smear-negative tuberculosis by bronchoalveolar lavage enzyme-linked immunospot. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006; 174(9): 10481054.Google Scholar
Maygarden, SJ, Flanders, EL. Mycobacteria can be seen as “negative images” in cytology smears from patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Mod Pathol 1989; 2(3): 239243.Google Scholar
Nasiell, M, Roger, V, Nasiell, K. Cytologic findings indicating pulmonary tuberculosis. Acta Cytol 1972; 16(2): 146151.Google Scholar
Tani, EM, Schmitt, FCL, Oliveria, ML, et al. Pulmonary cytology in tuberculosis. Acta Cytol 1987; 31(4): 460463.Google Scholar
Al-Abbadi, MA, Russo, K, Wilkinson, EJ. Pulmonary mucormycosis diagnosed by bronchoalveolar lavage: a case report and review of the literature. Pediatr Pulmonol 1997; 23(3): 222225.Google Scholar
DiTomasso, JP, Ampel, NM, Sobonya, RE, Bloom, JW. Bronchoscopic diagnosis of pulmonary coccidioidomycosis. Comparison of cytology, culture, and transbronchial biopsy. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 1994; 18(2): 8387.Google Scholar
Fischler, DF, Hall, GS, Gordon, S, et al. Aspergillus in cytology specimens: a review of 45 specimens from 36 patients. Diagn Cytopathol 1997; 16(1): 2630.Google Scholar
Kapur, U, Yong, SL, Wojcik, EM. Blastomyces associated with granulomatous inflammation in a bronchial lavage. Diagn Cytopathol 2005; 33(6): 399400.Google Scholar
Lemos, LB, Baliga, M, Taylor, BD, et al. Bronchoalveolar lavage for diagnosis of fungal disease. Five years’ experience in a southern United States rural area with many blastomycosis cases. Acta Cytol 1995; 39(6): 11011111.Google Scholar
Maesaki, S, Kohno, S, Mashimoto, H, et al. Detection of Cryptococcus neoformans in bronchial lavage cytology: report of four cases. Intern Med 1995; 34(1): 5457.Google Scholar
Oren, I, Goldstein, N. Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2002,8(3): 195200.Google Scholar
Seyfarth, HJ, Nenoff, P, Winkler, J, Krahl, R, Haustein, UF, Schauer, J. Aspergillus detection in bronchoscopically acquired material. Significance and interpretation. Mycoses 2001; 44(9–10): 356360.Google Scholar
Travis, WD, Colby, TV, Koss, MN, et al. Lung infections. In: King, DW, ed. Nonneoplastic Disorders of the Lower Respiratory Tract, 1st edn. Washington, DC: American Registry of Pathology and the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, 2002: 539728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, JD, Silverman, JF, Mallak, CT, Christie, JD. Atypical cytomorphologic appearance of Cryptococcus neoformans: a report of five cases. Acta Cytol 1996; 40(2): 363370.Google Scholar
Leibovitz, E, Pollack, H, Moore, T, et al. Comparison of PCR and standard cytological staining for detection of Pneumocystis carinii from respiratory specimens from patients with or at high risk for infection by human immunodeficiency virus. J Clin Microbiol 1995; 33(11): 30043007.Google Scholar
Nassar, A, Zapata, M, Little, JV, Siddiqui, MT. Utility of reflex Gomori methenamine silver staining for Pneumocystis jirovecii on bronchoalveolar lavage cytologic specimens: a review. Diagn Cytopathol 2006; 34(11): 719723.Google Scholar
Pinlaor, S, Mootsikapun, P, Pinlaor, P, et al. PCR diagnosis of Pneumocystis carinii on sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage samples in immunocompromised patients. Parasitol Res 2004; 94(3): 213218.Google Scholar
Wiwanitkit, V. Study of the cost-effectiveness of three staining methods for identification of Pneumocystis carinii in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Trop Doc 2005; 35(1): 2325.Google Scholar
Wazir, JF, Macrorie, SG, Coleman, DV. Evaluation of the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of monoclonal antibody 3F6 for the detection of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in bronchoalveolar lavage specimens and included sputum. Cytopathology 1994; 5(2): 8289.Google Scholar
Bayon, MN, Drut, R. Cytologic diagnosis of adenovirus bronchopneumonia. Acta Cytol 1991; 35(2): 181182.Google Scholar
Crosby, JH, Pantazis, CG, Stigall, B. In situ DNA hybridization for confirmation of herpes simplex virus in bronchoalveolar lavage smears. Acta Cytol 1991; 35(2)248250.Google ScholarPubMed
Fajac, A, Stephan, F, Ibrahim, A, et al. Value of cytomegalovirus detection by PCR in bronchoalveolar lavage routinely performed in asymptomatic bone marrow recipients. Bone Marrow Transplant 1997; 20(7): 581585.Google Scholar
Harboldt, SL, Dugan, JM, Tronic, BS. Cytologic diagnosis of measles pneumonia in a bronchoalveolar lavage specimen. A case report. Acta Cytol 1994; 38(3): 403406.Google Scholar
Iwa, N, Sasaki, CT, Yutani, C, Wakasa, K. Detection of cytomegalovirus DNA in pulmonary specimens: Confirmation by in situ hybridization in two cases. Diagn Cytopathol 1992; 8(4): 357360.Google Scholar
Macasact, F, Holley, KE, Smith, TF, Key, TF. Cytomegalovirus inclusion body in bronchial brushing material. Acta Cytol 1977; 21(2): 181182.Google Scholar
Naib, ZM, Stewart, JA, Dowdle, WR, et al. Cytological features of viral respiratory tract infections. Acta Cytol 1968; 12(2): 162170.Google Scholar
Travis, WD, Colby, TV, Koss, MN, et al. Lung infections. In: King, DW, ed. Nonneoplastic Disorders of the Lower Respiratory Tract, 1st edn. Washington, DC: American Registry of Pathology and the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, 2002: 539728.Google Scholar
Akoun, GM, Gauthier-Rahman, S, Milleron, BJ, Perrot, JY. Amiodarone-induced hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Evidence of an immunological cell-mediated mechanism. Chest 1984; 85(1): 133135.Google Scholar
Coudert, B, Bailly, F, Lombard, JN, et al. Amiodarone pneumonitis. Bronchoalveolar lavage findings in 15 patients and review of the literature. Chest 1992; 102(4): 10051012.Google Scholar
Fraire, AE, Guntupalli, KK, Greenberg, SD, et al. Amiodarone pulmonary toxicity: a multidisciplinary review of current status. South Med J 1993; 86(1): 6777.Google Scholar
Bedrossian, CWM. Iatrogenic and toxic injury. In: Dail, DH, Hammar, SP, eds. Pulmonary Pathology. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, 1988: 511534.Google Scholar
Koss, LG, Melamed, MR, Mayer, K. The effect of busulfan on human epithelia. Am J Clin Pathol 1965; 44(4); 385397.Google Scholar
Luna, MA, Bedrossian, CWM, Lichtiger, B, Salem, PA. Interstitial pneumonitis associated with bleomycin therapy. Am J Clin Pathol 1972; 58(5): 501510.Google Scholar
Brunnström, H, Johansson, L, Jirström, K, et al. Immunohistochemistry in the differential diagnosis of primary lung cancer: an investigation within the Southern Swedish Lung Cancer Study. Am J Clin Pathol 2013: 140: 3746.Google Scholar
Gupta, RK. Value of sputum cytology in the diagnosis and typing of bronchogenic carcinomas, excluding adenocarcinomas. Acta Cytol 1982; 26(5): 645648.Google Scholar
Liang, XM. Accuracy of cytologic diagnosis and cytotyping of sputum in primary lung cancer: analysis of 161 cases. J Surg Oncol 1989; 40(2): 107111.Google Scholar
Nakajima, M, Manabe, T, Yagi, S. Appearance of mesothelioma cells in sputum: a case report. Acta Cytol 1992; 36(5): 731736.Google Scholar
Rivera, MP, Detterbeck, F, Mehta, AC. Diagnosis of lung cancer: the guidelines. Chest 2003; 123(1 Suppl): 129S136S.Google Scholar
Schreiber, G, McCrory, DC. Performance characteristics of different modalities for diagnosis of suspected lung cancer: Summary of published evidence. Chest 2003; 123(1 Suppl): 115S128S.Google Scholar
Shanies, HM, Mehta, DC, Robert, TL. Diagnosis of lymphangitic carcinoma to lung by sputum cytology: case report. Angiology 1995; 46(11): 10351038.Google Scholar
Ganti, AK, Newly diagnosed lung cancer: which molecular tests are needed for optimal treatment decision making? Oncology (Williston Park) 2018; 32(6): 276–280.Google Scholar
Janaki, N, Harbhajanka, A, Michael, CW, et al. Comparison of cytocentrifugation supernatant fluid and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue for targeted next-generation sequencing. Cancer Cytopathol 2019; 127(5): 297305.Google Scholar
Newman, AM, Bratman, SV, To, J, et al. An ultrasensitive method for quantitating circulating tumor DNA with broad patient coverage. Nature medicine 2014; 20(5): 548554.Google Scholar
Auerbach, O, Stout, AP, Hammond, EC, Garfinkell, L. Changes in bronchial epithelium in relation to cigarette smoking and in relation to lung cancer. New J Med 1961; 265: 253267.Google Scholar
Bechtel, JJ, Kelley, WR, Petty, TL, et al. Outcome of 51 patients with roentgenographically occult lung cancer detected by sputum cytologic testing: a community hospital program. Arch Intern Med 1994; 154(9): 975980.Google Scholar
Chen, JT, Chen, YC, Wang, YC, et al. Alterations of the p16INKA4A gene in resected nonsmall cell lung tumors and exfoliated cells within sputum. Int J Cancer 2002; 98(5): 724731.Google Scholar
Erozan, YS, Pressman, NJ, Donovan, PA, et al. A comparative cytopathologic study of noninvasive and invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. Anal Quant Cytol 1979; 1(1): 5056.Google Scholar
Frost, JK. The cell in health and disease. An evaluation of cellular morphologic expression of biologic behavior. In: Wied, GL, ed. Monographs in Clinical Cytology, 2nd edn. Basel: S Krager, 1986: 165186.Google Scholar
Frost, JK, Gupta, PK, Erozan, YS, et al. Pulmonary cytologic alterations in toxic environmental inhalation. Hum Pathol 1973; 4(4): 521536.Google Scholar
Matsuda, M, Nagumo, S, Horai, T, Yoshino, K. Cytologic diagnosis of laryngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma in sputum. Acta Cytol 1988; 32(5): 655657.Google ScholarPubMed
Miozzo, M, Sozzi, G, Musso, K, et al. Microsatellite alterations in bronchial and sputum specimens of lung cancer patients. Cancer Res 1996: 56(10); 22852288.Google Scholar
Ritter, JH, Wick, MR, Reyes, A, et al. False-positive interpretations of carcinoma in exfoliative respiratory cytology. Report of two cases and a review of underlying disorders. Am J Clin Pathol 1995; 104(2): 133140.Google Scholar
Saccomanno, G. Carcinoma in situ of the lung: its development, detection, and treatment. Sem Resp Med 1982; 4: 156160.Google Scholar
Tao, LC, Chamberlain, DW, Delarue, NC, et al. Cytologic diagnosis of radiographically occult squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. Cancer 1982; 50(8): 15801586.Google Scholar
Fedullo, AJ, Ettensohn, DB. Bronchoalveolar lavage in lymphangitic spread of adenocarcinoma to the lung. Chest 1985; 87(1): 129131.Google Scholar
Hirokawa, M, Shimizu, M, Kanahara, T, Manabe, T. Plant cells mimicking adenocarcinoma in sputum. Acta Cytol 1998; 42(5): 13061307.Google Scholar
Kaminsky, DA, Leiman, G. False-positive sputum cytology in a case of pulmonary infarction. Respir Care 2004; 49(2): 186188.Google Scholar
Linder, J, Radio, SJ, Robbins, RA, et al. Bronchoalveolar lavage in the cytologic diagnosis of carcinoma of lung. Acta Cytol 1987; 31(6): 796801.Google Scholar
Martinez-Giron, R, Ribas-Barcelo, A. Pitfall in sputum cytology: Protoctista resembling adenocarcinoma cells. Diagn Cytopathol 2007; 35(1): 3233.Google Scholar
Mermolja, M, Rott, T. Cytology of endobronchial granular cell tumor. Diagn Cytopathol 1991; 7(5): 524526.Google Scholar
Naryshkin, S, Young, NA. Respiratory cytology: a review of non-neoplastic mimics of malignancy. Diagn Cytopathol 1993; 9(1): 8997.Google Scholar
Travis, WD, Brambilla, E, Noguchi, M, et al. International Association for The Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society International Multidisciplinary Classification of Lung adenocarcinoma. J Thoracic Oncol 2011; 6(2): 244285.Google Scholar
Radio, SJ, Rennard, SI, Kessinger, A, et al. Breast carcinoma in bronchoalveolar lavage. A cytologic and immunohistochemical study. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1989; 113(4): 333336.Google Scholar
Smith, JH, Frable, WJ. Adenocarcinoma of the lung: cytologic correlation with histologic types. Acta Cytol 1974; 18(4): 316320.Google Scholar
Thivolet-Bejui, F. Cytological pitfalls in bronchopulmonary tumors. Diagn Cytopathol 1997; 17(6): 412416.Google Scholar
Beasley, MB, Brambilla, E, Travis, WD. The 2004 World Health Organization Classification of lung tumors. Semin Roentgenol 2005; 40(2): 9097.Google Scholar
Casey, K, Winterbauer, RH. Persistent pulmonary infiltrate and bronchorrhea in a young woman. Chest 1997; 111(5): 14421445.Google Scholar
Ohori, NP, Santa Maria, EL. Cytopathologic diagnosis of bronchioalveolar carcinoma: does it correlate with the 1999 World Health Organization definition? Am J Clin Pathol 2004; 122(1): 1416.Google Scholar
Gupta, RK. Value of sputum cytology in the differential diagnosis of alveolar cell carcinoma from bronchogenic adenocarcinoma. Acta Cytol 1981; 25(3): 255258.Google Scholar
Lozowski, W, Hajdu, SI. Cytology and immunocytochemistry of bronchioloalveolar carcinoma. Acta Cytol 1987; 31(6): 717725.Google Scholar
Roger, V, Nasiell, M, Linden, M, Enstad, I. Cytologic differential diagnosis of bronchiolo-alveolar carcinoma and bronchogenic adenocarcinoma. Acta Cytol 1976; 20(4): 303307.Google Scholar
Sestini, P, Rottoli, L, Gotti, G, et al. Bronchoalveolar lavage diagnosis of bronchioloalveolar carcinoma. Eur J Respir Dis 1985; 66(1): 5558.Google Scholar
Aron, M, Kapila, K, Verma, K. Carcinoid tumors of the lung: a diagnostic challenge in bronchial washings. Diagn Cytopathol 2004; 30(1): 6266.Google Scholar
Huang, CC, Collins, B, Flint, A, Michael, CW. Neuroendocrine neoplasms. An entity in search of diagnostic features. Diagn Cytopathol 2012 41(8): 689696.Google Scholar
Nicholson, SA, Ryan, MR. A review of cytologic findings in neuroendocrine carcinomas including carcinoid tumors with histologic correlation. Cancer 2000; 90(3): 148161.Google Scholar
Renshaw, AA, Haja, J, Lozano, RL, Wilbur, DC. Distinguishing carcinoid tumor from small cell carcinoma of the lung: correlating cytologic features and performance in the College of American Pathologists Non-Gynecologic Cytology Program. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2005; 129(5): 614618.Google Scholar
Hiroshima, K, Abe, S, Ebihara, Y, et al. Cytological characteristics of pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. Lung Cancer 2005 ; 48(3): 331337.Google Scholar
Kakinuma, H, Mikami, T, Iwabuchi, K, et al. Diagnostic findings of bronchial brush cytology for pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas: comparison with poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas, squamous cell carcinomas, and small cell carcinomas. Cancer 2003; 99(4): 247254.Google Scholar
Wiatrowska, BA, Krol, J, Zakowski, MF. Large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung: proposed criteria for cytologic diagnosis. Diagn Cytopathol 2001; 24(1): 5864.Google Scholar
Gephardt, GN, Belovich, DM. Cytology of pulmonary carcinoid tumors. Acta Cytol 1982; 26(4): 434438.Google Scholar
Kyriakos, M, Rockoff, SD. Brush biopsy of bronchial carcinoid: A source of cytologic errors. Acta Cytol 1972; 16(3): 261268.Google Scholar
Michael, CW, Collins, B, Flint, A. The cytologic classification of pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors: how far can we go? Acta Cytol 2000; 44(5): 902.Google Scholar
Mitchell, ML, Parker, FP. Capillaries, a cytologic feature of pulmonary carcinoid tumors. Acta Cytol 1991; 35(2): 183185.Google Scholar
Nicholson, SA, Ryan, MR. A review of cytologic findings in neuroendocrine carcinomas including carcinoid tumors with histologic correlation. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2000; 90(3): 148161.Google Scholar
Nguyen, GK. Cytopathology of pulmonary carcinoid tumors in sputum and bronchial brushings. Acta Cytol 1995; 39(6): 11521160.Google Scholar
Sturgis, CD, Nassar, DL, D’Antonio, JA, Raab, SS. Cytologic features useful for distinguishing small cell from non-small cell carcinoma in bronchial brush and wash specimens. Am J Clin Pathol 2000; 114(2): 197202.Google Scholar
Travis, WD, Shimosato, BC, Brambilla, E. Histologic Typing of Lung and Pleural Tumors. Berlin: Springer, 1999: 2147.Google Scholar
Travis, WD, Rush, W, Flieder, DB, et al. Survival analysis of 200 pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors with clarification of criteria for atypical carcinoid and its separation from typical carcinoid. Am J Surg Pathol 1998; 22(8); 934944.Google Scholar
Travis, WD, Linnoila, RI, Tsokos, MG, et al. Neuroendocrine tumors of the lung with proposed criteria for large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. An ultrastructural, immunohistochemical, and flow cytometric study of 35 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1991; 15(6): 529553.Google Scholar
Broderick, PA, Corvese, NL, LaChance, T, Allard, J. Giant cell carcinoma of lung: a cytologic evaluation. Acta Cytol 1975; 19(3): 225230.Google Scholar
Burns, TR, Underwood, RD, Greenberg, SD, et al. Cytomorphometry of large cell carcinoma of the lung. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 1989; 11(1): 4852.Google Scholar
Johansson, L. Histopathologic classification of lung cancer: relevance of cytokeratin and TTF-1 immunophenotyping. Ann Diagn Pathol 2004; 8(5): 259267.Google Scholar
Bardales, RH, Powers, CN, Frierson, HF Jr, et al. Exfoliative respiratory cytology in the diagnosis of leukemias and lymphomas in the lung. Diagn Cytopathol 1996; 14(2): 108113.Google Scholar
Keicho, N, Oka, T, Takeuchi, K, et al. Detection of lymphomatous involvement of the lung by bronchoalveolar lavage. Application of immunophenotypic and gene rearrangement analysis. Chest 1994; 105(2): 458462.Google Scholar
Lorenzetti, E, Nardi, F. Diagnostic value of bronchial washing in a case of primary pulmonary non-Hodgkin lymphoma. App Pathol 1984; 2(5): 277281.Google Scholar
Michael, CW, Richardson, PH, Boudreaux, CW. Pulmonary lymphoma of the mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue type: Report of a case with cytological, histological, immunophenotypical correlation, and review of the literature. Ann Diagn Pathol 2005; 9(3): 148152.Google Scholar
Riazmontazer, N, Bedayat, G. Cytology of plasma cell myeloma in bronchial washing. Acta Cytol 1989; 33(4): 519522.Google Scholar
Stanley, C, Wolf, P, Haghighi, P. Reed-Sternberg cells in sputum from a patient with the Hodgkin’s disease. A case report. Acta Cytol 1993; 37(1): 9092.Google Scholar
Zompi, S, Couderc, LJ, Cadranel, J, et al. Clonality analysis of alveolar B lymphocytes contributes to the diagnostic strategy in clinical suspicion of pulmonary lymphoma. Blood 2004; 103(8): 32083215.Google Scholar
Attwood, HD, Price, CG, Riddell, RJ. Primary diffuse tracheobronchial amyloidosis. Thorax 1972; 27(5): 620624.Google Scholar
Michael, C W, Naylor, B. Amyloid in cytologic specimens: differential diagnosis and diagnostic pitfalls. Acta Cytol 1999; 43(5): 746755.Google Scholar
Nguyen, GK. Cytology of bronchial gland carcinoma. Acta Cytol 1988; 32(2): 235239.Google Scholar
Radhika, S, Dey, P, Rajwanshi, A, et al. Adenoid cystic carcinoma in a bronchial washing: A case report. Acta Cytol 1993; 37(1): 9799.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×