Akkerman, J. B. 1962. ‘Het koopmansgilde van Tiel omstreeks het jaar 1000’, Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis 30: 409–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alfani, G. and Rao, R. (eds.). 2011. La gestione delle risorse collettive. Italia settentrionale, secoli XII–XVIII. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar

Allen, R. C. 1992. Enclosure and the yeoman: the agricultural development of the South Midlands, 1450–1850. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andries, J. O. 1879. ‘Recueil de documents tendant à résourdre la question de propriété des Gemeene et Looweiden situées à Assebrouck et Oedelem les Bruges’, Annales de la Société d’Émulation de Bruges 5–10: 141–86.Google Scholar

Axelrod, R. 1984. The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Bainbridge, V. R. 1996. Gilds in the medieval countryside: social and religious change in Cambridgeshire, c.1350–1558. Studies in the history of medieval religion, 10. Woodbridge, Suffolk: Boydell Press.Google Scholar

Berman, H. J. 1983. Law and revolution: the formation of the western legal tradition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Berten, D. 1907. Coutumes de la seigneurie de Saint Bavon. Coutumes des pays et comté de Flandre. Recueil des anciennes coutumes de la Belgique. Vol. 14, Quartier de Gand. Bruxelles: Goemaere.Google Scholar

Beuzel, G. J. 1988. Het markeboek van de marke Exel 1616–1837. S.l.: Oostgelders Tijdschrift voor Genealogie en Boerderij-onderzoek.Google Scholar

Bieleman, J. 1999. ‘Farming system research as a guideline in agricultural history’, in Van Bavel, and Thoen, (eds.), 1999, pp. 235–50.Google Scholar

Black, A. 1984. Guilds and civil society in European political thought from the twelfth century to the present. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Blickle, P. 1998. From the communal reformation to the revolution of the common man. Studies in Medieval and Reformation Thought, 65. Leiden/Boston: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blok, D. P. (ed.). 1982. Algemene geschiedenis der nederlanden, Vol. 2. Haarlem: Fibula-Van Dishoeck.Google Scholar

Bosker, E. M., Buringh, E., and van Zanden, J. L. 2013. ‘From Baghdad to London: unraveling urban development in Europe, the Middle East, and North Africa, 800–1800’, Review of Economics and Statistics 95: 1418–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brakensiek, S. 2000. ‘Gemeinheitsteilungen in Europa. Neue Forschungsergebnisse und Deutungsangebote der europäischen Geschichtsschreibung’, Jahrbuch für Wirtschaftsgeschichte 2: 9–16.Google Scholar

Brewer, M. B. and Kramer, R. M. 1986. ‘Choice behavior in social dilemmas: effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50: 543–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brusse, P. G., Schuurman, A., Molle, I., and Vanhaute, E. 2010. ‘The Low Countries, 1750–2000’, in Van Bavel, and Hoyle, (eds.), 2010, pp. 199–224.Google Scholar

Bublot, G. 1957. La production agricole belge. Etude économique séculaire, 1846–1955. Leuven-Paris: Editions NauwelAerts-Béatrice NauwelAerts.Google Scholar

Bull, I. 2004. ‘Professions, absolutism and the role of widows’, Scandinavian Journal of History 29: 193–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buskens, V. W. and Maas, I. (eds.). 2012. Samenwerking in sociale dilemma’s; voorbeelden van Nederlands onderzoek. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar

Campbell, B. M. S. 1980. ‘Population change and the genesis of common fields on a Norfolk manor’, The Economic History Review 33: 174–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casari, M. and Lisciandra, M. 2014. ‘Gender discrimination in property rights: six centuries of commons governance in the Alps’, Working Paper, University of Bologna. Available online at http://www2.dse.unibo.it/casari/research/wp-gender.pdf (Accessed 13 August 2014).Google Scholar

Casari, M. and Lisciandra, M. 2011. ‘L’evoluzione della trasmissione ereditaria delle risorse collettive in Trentino tra i secoli XIII e XIX’, in Alfani, and Rao, (eds.), 2011, pp. 17–31.Google Scholar

Casari, M. and Lisciandra, M. 2010. ‘Gender-biased inheritance systems are evolutionary stable: a case study in northern Italy in the XII–XIX century’, Working Paper, University of Bologna.Google Scholar

Clicheroux, E. 1957. ‘L’évolution des terrains incultes en Belgique’, Bulletin de l’Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 23: 497–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Congost, R. 2007. Tierras, leyes, historia: estudios sobre la gran obra de la propriedad. Barcelona: Critica.Google Scholar

Congost, R. and Lana Berasain, J. M. (eds.) 2007. Campos cerrados, debates abiertos. Análisis histórico y propriedad de la tierra in Europa (siglos XVI–XIX). Pamplona: Public University of Navarre.Google Scholar

Cox, S. J. B. 1985. ‘No tragedy of the commons’, Environmental Ethics 7: 49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dahlman, C. J. 1980. The open field system and beyond: a property rights analysis of an economic institution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Darwin, C. 1859. On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London: John Murray.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Bo, L. L. 1873. Westvlaamsch idioticon, bewerkt door L. L. de Bo, …Brugge: Boek– en steendrukkerij E. Gailliard.Google Scholar

De Kerf, R. 2010. De juiste prijs in de laatmiddeleeuwse stad: een onderzoek naar middeleeuwse economische ethiek op de ambachtelijke markt en in moralistische lekenliteratuur. Studies stadsgeschiedenis, 6. Amsterdam: Aksant.Google Scholar

De Laveleye, E. 1891. De la proriété et de ses formes primitives. 4th ed. Paris: Félix Alcan.Google Scholar

De Monté Verloren, J. Ph. 2000. Hoofdlijnen uit de ontwikkeling der rechterlijke organisatie in de Noordelijke Nederlanden tot de Bataafse omwenteling. 7th ed. Deventer: Kluwer.Google Scholar

De Moor, M. 2005. ‘De Gemene en Loweiden in Assebroek als één van de laatste gemene gronden in Vlaanderen. Beknopte geschiedenis van de instelling en inventaris van het archief’, Handelingen van het Genootschap voor Geschiedenis, gesticht onder de benaming ‘Sociéte d’Émulation’ te Brugge: driemaandelijks tijdschrift voor de studie van geschiedenis en oudheden van Vlaanderen 142: 3–45.Google Scholar

De Moor, M. 2003a. ‘Les terres communes en Belgique’, in Demélas, and Vivier, (eds.), 2003, pp. 119–38.Google Scholar

De Moor, M. 2003b. ‘Tot proffijt van de ghemeensaemheijt. Gebruik, gebruikers en beheer van gemene gronden in Zandig Vlaanderen, 18de en 19de eeuw’, unpublished PhD thesis, Ghent University.Google Scholar

De Moor, M. 2002. ‘Common land and common rights in Flanders’, in De Moor, , Shaw-Taylor, , and Warde, (eds.), 2002a, pp. 113–42.Google Scholar

De Moor, M. and Debbaut, R. 2003. De aanborgers van de Gemene en Loweiden, 1515–1965. Brugge: Van de Wiele.Google Scholar

De Moor, M., Shaw-Taylor, L, and Warde, P. 2002a. The management of common land in north west Europe, c.1500–1850. Turnhout: Brepols.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Moor, M., Shaw-Taylor, L, and Warde, P. 2002b. ‘Comparing the historical commons of north west Europe. An introduction’. In De Moor, , Shaw-Taylor, , and Warde, (eds.), 2002a, pp. 15–32.Google Scholar

De Moor, M., Shaw-Taylor, L, and Warde, P. 2002c. ‘Preliminary conclusions. The commons of north west Europe’, in De Moor, , Shaw-Taylor, , and Warde, (eds.), 2002a, pp. 247–60.Google Scholar

De Moor, T., 2014. ‘Single, safe, and sorry? Explaining the early modern beguine movement in the Low Countries’, Journal of Family History 39: 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Moor, T. 2013. Homo cooperans. Institutions for collective action and the compassionate society. Utrecht: Utrecht University.Google Scholar

De Moor, T. 2012. ‘Inspiratie uit ons institutionele geheugen. Instituties voor collectieve actie als structurele oplossingen voor sociale dilemma’s in het Europese verleden’, in Buskens, and Maas, (eds.), 2012, pp. 185–208.Google Scholar

De Moor, T. 2009. ‘Avoiding tragedies: a Flemish common and its commoners under the pressure of social and economic change during the eighteenth century’, The Economic History Review 62: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Moor, T. 2008. ‘The silent revolution: a new perspective on the emergence of commons, guilds, and other forms of corporate collective action in western Europe’, International Review of Social History 53: 179–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Moor, T. 2007. ‘La función del común. La trayectoria de un comunal en Flandes durante los siglos XVIII y XIX’, in Congost and Lana Berasain (eds.), pp. 111–39.Google Scholar

De Moor, T. and Van Zanden, J. L. 2012. ‘Debat. Een reactie van De Moor en Van Zanden op het tseg-artikel van Manon van der Heijden, Elise van Nederveen Meerkerk en Ariadne Schmidt: “Terugkeer van het patriarchaat? Vrije vrouwen in de republiek”’, Tijdschrift voor Sociale en Economische Geschiedenis 9: 61–8.Google Scholar

De Moor, T. and Van Zanden, J. L. 2010. ‘Girl power: the European marriage pattern and labour markets in the north sea region in the late medieval and early modern period’, The Economic History Review 63: 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Moor, T. and Van Zanden, J. L. 2006. Vrouwen en de geboorte van het kapitalisme in West-Europa. Amsterdam: Boom.Google Scholar

De Munck, B., Lourens, P., and Lucassen, J. 2006. ‘The establishment and distribution of craft guilds in the Low Countries, 1000–1800’, in Prak et al. (eds.), 2006, pp. 32–73.Google Scholar

De Page, H. and Dekkers, R. 1975. Traité élémentaire de droit civil Belge. Tôme V. Les principaux contracts usuels II Les biens I. Bruxelles: Bruylant.Google Scholar

De Vries, B. and Van Tijn, Th. (eds.). 1992. De kracht der zwakken: studies over arbeid en arbeidersbeweging in het verleden opstellen aangeboden aan Theo van Tijn bij zijn afscheid als hoogleraar economische en sociale geschiedenis aan de Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht. Amsterdam: Stichting Beheer IISG.Google Scholar

Dejongh, G. 1996. Krachtlijnen in de ontwikkeling van het agrarische bodemgebruik in België, 1750–1850. Onderzoeksrapport Centrum voor Economische Studiën. Leuven: Centrum voor Economische Studiën (KUL).Google Scholar

Dejongh, G. and Thoen, E. 1999. ‘Arable productivity in Flanders and the former territory of Belgium in a long-term perspective (from the Middle Ages to the end of the Ancien ancien Rgimerégime)’, in Van Bavel, and Thoen, (eds.), 1999, pp. 30–64.Google Scholar

Demélas, M.-D. and Vivier, N. (eds.). 2003. Les propriétés collectives face aux attaques libérales (1750–1914). Europe occidentale et Amérique latine. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Devos, L. F. 1937. ‘Het Vrijbroek en de “gemeynten” te Mechelen’, Mechelse Bijdragen 4: 58–72.Google Scholar

Devos, L. F. 1936. ‘Het Vrijbroek en de “gemeynten” te Mechelen’, Mechelse Bijdragen 3: 30–63.Google Scholar

Droesen, W. J. 1927. De gemeentegronden in Noord-Brabant en Limburg en hunne ontginning. Eene geschied– en landhuishoudkundige studie. Roermond: Romen.Google Scholar

Dyer, C. 2002. Making a living in the Middle Ages: the people of Britain 850–1520. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Easterly, W. 2006. The white man’s burden: why the West’s efforts to aid the rest have done so much ill and so little good. New York: Penguin Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ehmer, J. 2009. ‘Rural guilds and urban-rural guild relations in early modern central Europe’, in Lucassen, , De Moor, , and Van Zanden, (eds.), 2009, pp. 143–58.Google Scholar

Engel, R. 1956. ‘Le partage des biens communaux dans le Duché de Luxembourg depuis Marie-Thérèse jusqu’à la fin de la domination Autrichienne’, Hémecht. Zeitschrift für Luxemburger Geschichte. 9: 32–55 and 178–205; 10: 72–87; 11: 72–89.Google Scholar

Engels, F. 1884. Der Ursprung der Familie, des Privateigentums und des Staats; im Anschluß an Lewis H. Morgans Forschungen. Hottingen-Zurich: Schweizerischer Genossenschaftsbuchdruckerei.Google Scholar

Enklaar, D. Th. 1932. Middeleeuwsche rechtsbronnen van Stad en Lande van Gooiland. Utrecht: Kemink.Google Scholar

Epstein, S. 1991. Wage labor & guilds in medieval Europe. Chapel Hill/London: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Epstein, S. R. 2004. ‘Property rights to technical knowledge in premodern Europe, 1300–1800’, American Economic Review 94: 382–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Epstein, S. R. 1998. ‘Craft guilds, apprenticeship, and technological change in preindustrial Europe’, The Journal of Economic History 58: 684–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Epstein, S. R. 1991. Wage Labor and Guilds in Medieval Europe. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Errera, P. 1891. Les masuïrs. Recherches historiques et juridiques sur quelques vestiges des formes anciennes de la propriété en Belgique. Bruxelles: P. Weissenbruch.Google Scholar

Ferraris, J. J. F.. 1777. Bruges, fo. 14 of the Kabinetskaart van de Oostenrijkse Nederlanden. Map. Malines: s.e., 1777. From Royal Library of Belgium, Kaarten en plannen [Maps and Plans], signature Ms. IV 5.567.Google Scholar

Ferraris, J. J. F.. 1777. Damme, fo. 24 of the Kabinetskaart van de Oostenrijkse Nederlanden. Map. Malines: s.e., 1777. From Royal Library of Belgium, Kaarten en plannen [Maps and Plans], signature Ms. IV 5.567.Google Scholar

Fox-Genovese, E. 1976. The origins of Physiocracy: economic revolution and social order in eighteenth-century France. Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Galenson, D. W. (ed.). 1989. Markets in history: economic studies of the past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gilissen, J. 1981. Historische inleiding tot het recht: overzicht van de wereldgeschiedenis van het recht, de bronnen van het recht in de Belgische gewesten sedert de 13e eeuw, geschiedenis van het privaatrecht. Antwerpen: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Gilliodts-Van Severen, L. 1880. De la coutûme de franc de Bruges. Bruxelles: Commission Royale d’Histoire.Google Scholar

Godding, P. 1987. Le droit privé dans les Pays-Bas méridionaux du 12e au 18e siecle. Bruxelles: Palais des Académies.Google Scholar

Goossens, M. 1993. The economic development of Belgian agriculture: a regional perspective, 1812–1846. Studies in Social and Economic History. Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar

Greif, A. 2006a. ‘Family structure, institutions, and growth: The origins and implications of Western corporations’, American Economic Review 96: 308–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greif, A. 2006b. Institutions and the path to the modern economy: lessons from medieval trade. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greif, A., Milgrom, P., and Weingast, B. R. 1994. ‘Coordination, commitment, and enforcement: the case of the merchant guild’, Journal of Political Economy 102: 745–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gustaffson, B. 1987. ‘The rise and economic behaviour of medieval craft guilds. An economic-theoretical interpretation’, The Scandinavian Economic History Review 35: 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hannink, G. 1992. Het markeboek van de marke Raalterwoold. Raalte: s.e.Google Scholar

Hardin, G. 1968. ‘The tragedy of the commons’, Science 16: 1243–8.Google Scholar

Haris, C. (ed.). 1979. The sociology of the family: New directions for Britain. Keele: University of Keele.Google Scholar

Heringa, J. 1982. De buurschap en haar marke. Assen: Provinciaal Bestuur Drenthe.Google Scholar

Hickson, C. R. and Thompson, E. 1991. ‘A new theory of guilds and European economic development’, Explorations in Economic History 28: 127–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hopcroft, R. L. 1999. Regions, institutions, and agrarian change in European history. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoppenbrouwers, P. 2002. ‘The use and management of commons in the Netherlands. An overview’, in De Moor, , Shaw-Taylor, , and Warde, (eds.), 2002a, pp. 88–112.Google Scholar

Hoppenbrouwers, P. C. M. 2007. ‘Meer mythen rond twee meenten: De latere geschiedenis van de meenten het Wijkerzand te Wijk en de Ebbe te Aalburg, 18e t/m 20e eeuw’, in Stichting Historische Reeks Land van Heusden en Altena (ed.), Historische Reeks Land van Heusden en Altena, Vol. 16 (Heusden: Stichting Historische Reeks Land van Heusden en Altena), pp. 99–134.Google Scholar

Hoppenbrouwers, P. C. M. 1993. ‘Een meent en haar mythen; de vroegste geschiedenis van het Wijkerzand (15de-16de eeuw)’, in Stichting Historische Reeks Land van Heusden en Altena (ed.), Historische Reeks Land van Heusden en Altena, Vol. 3, Liber Amicorum C. G. Boender, Burgemeester van Aalburg 1978–1993 (Heusden:Stichting Historische Reeks Land van Heusden en Altena), pp. 41–63.Google Scholar

Hoyle, R. W. 2010. ‘Conclusion: reflections on power and property over the last millennium’, in Van Bavel, and Hoyle, (eds.), 2010, pp. 349–75.Google Scholar

Huff, T. E. 2003. The rise of early modern science: Islam, China, and the West. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacquemyns, G. 1929. Histoire de la crise économique des Flandres, 1845–1850. Bruxelles: M. Lamertin.Google Scholar

Jager, W. 2000. Modelling consumer behaviour. Veenendaal: Universal Press.Google Scholar

Jager, W., Janssen, M. A., De Vries, H. J. M., De Greef, J., and Vlek, C. A. J. 2000. ‘Behaviour in commons dilemmas: Homo economicus and homo psychologicus in an ecological-economic model’, Ecological Economics 35: 357–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jorgenson, D. O. and Papciak, A. S. 1981. ‘The effects of communication, resource feedback, and identifiability on behavior in a commons’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 17: 373–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kain, R. J. P. 1992. The cadastral map in the service of the state: a history of property mapping. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennedy, D. and Norman, C. 2005. ‘What don’t we know?’, Science 309: 75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Knaepen, R. 1982. Mol-Baelen-Desschel 1559–1795. De oude Keizerlijke vrijheid en haar voogdijdistrict. Mol: Lions Mol-Geel.Google Scholar

Kohn, M. G. 2003. ‘Merchant associations in pre-industrial Europe’, Working Paper, Social Science Research Network. Available online at http://www.ssrn.com (Accessed 11 May 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koninklijke Geschied– en Oudheidkundige Kring van de Antwerpse Kempen (ed.). 2005. Taxandria: Jaarboek van de koninklijke geschied– en oudheidkundige kring van de Antwerpse Kempen, Nieuwe Reeks vol. 77. Turnhout: Koninklijke Geschied– en Oudheidkundige Kring van de Antwerpse Kempen.Google Scholar

Koninklijke Geschied– en Oudheidkundige Kring van de Antwerpse Kempen (ed.). 2004. Taxandria: Jaarboek van de koninklijke geschied– en oudheidkundige kring van de Antwerpse Kempen, Nieuwe Reeks vol. 76. Turnhout: Koninklijke Geschied– en Oudheidkundige Kring van de Antwerpse Kempen.Google Scholar

Kos, A. 2010. Van meenten tot marken. Een onderzoek naar de oorsprong en ontwikkeling van de Gooise marken en de gebruiksrechten op de gemene gronden van de Gooise markegenoten. Hilversum: Verloren.Google Scholar

Kullmann, W. 1980. ‘Der Mensch als politisches Lebenswesen bei Aristoteles’, Hermes: Zeitschrift für klassische Philologie 108: 419–43.Google Scholar

Kuran, T. 2010. The long divergence: how Islamic law held back the Middle East. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Laborda Pemán, M. and De Moor, T. 2013. ‘A tale of two commons. Some preliminary hypotheses on the long-term development of the commons in Western and Eastern Europe, 11th–19th centuries’, International Journal of the Commons 7: 7–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lana Berasain, J. M. 2008. ‘From equilibrium to equity. The survival of the commons in the Ebro Basin: Navarra, from the 15th to the 20th centuries’, International Journal of the Commons 2: 162–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levi, M. 1988. Of rule and revenue. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Lindemans, P. 1952. Geschiedenis van de landbouw in België, Vol. 2. Antwerpen-Borgerhout: De Sikkel.Google Scholar

Lindemans, P. 1994. Geschiedenis van de landbouw in België, Vol. 2. Antwerpen-Borgerhout: De Sikkel.Google Scholar

Lis, C. and Soly, H. (eds.). 1997. Werelden van verschil. Ambachtsgilden in de Lage Landen. Brussel: VUB Press.Google Scholar

Lis, C. and Soly, H. 1994. ‘Corporatisme, onderaanneming en loonarbeid. flexibilisering en deregulering van de arbeidsmarkt in Westeuropese steden (veertiende tot achttiende eeuw)’, Tijdschrift voor Sociale Geschiedenis 20: 365–90.Google Scholar

Lloyd, W. F. 1833. Two lectures on the checks to population, delivered before the University of Oxford, in Michaelmas term 1832. Oxford, S. Collingwood. Available online at http://www.archive.org/details/twolecturesonch00lloygoog (Accessed 14 August 2014).Google Scholar

Lourens, P. and Lucassen, J. 1997. ‘De oprichting en ontwikkeling van ambachtsgilden in Nederland (13de-19de eeuw)’, in Lis, and Soly, (eds.), 1997, pp. 43–77.Google Scholar

Lourens, P., Lucassen, J., and De Munck, B. 2006. ‘The establishment and distribution of craft guilds in the Low Countries, 1000–1800’, in Prak, et al. (eds.), 2005, pp. 32–73.Google Scholar

Lucassen, J., De Moor, T., and Van Zanden, J. L. (eds.). 2008. ‘The return of the guilds: Towards a global history of the guilds in pre-industrial times’, International Review of Social History 53, Supplement 16: 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacKenney, R. 1987. Tradesmen and traders: the world of the guilds in Venice and Europe, c.1250–1650. London and Sidney: Croom Helm.Google Scholar

Maniatis, G. C. 2009. Guilds, price formation and market structures in Byzantium. Variorum Collected Studies, Vol. 925. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Marx, K. 1867. Das Kapital, Kritik der politischen Ökonomie. Hamburg: Meissner.Google Scholar

Mastboom, J. M. 1994. ‘Guild or union? A case study of rural Dutch weavers, 1682–1750’, International Review of Social History 39: 57–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., and Tilly, C. 2001. Dynamics of contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McC. Netting, R. 1981. Balancing on an Alp. Ecological change and continuity in a Swiss mountain community. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

McCloskey, D. 1989. ‘The open fields of England: rent, risk and the rate of interest, 1300–1815’, in Galenson, (ed.), 1989, pp. 5–51.Google Scholar

McCloskey, D. N. 1991. ‘The prudent peasant: new findings on open fields’, Journal of Economic History 51: 343–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCloskey, D. N. 1975. ‘The economics of enclosure: a market analysis’, in Parker, and Jones, (eds.), 1975, pp. 123–60.Google Scholar

McCloskey, D. N. 1972. ‘The enclosure of open fields: preface to a study of its impact on the efficiency of English agriculture in the eighteenth century’, Journal of Economic History 32: 15–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCray, P. 1999. Glassmaking in renaissance Venice: the fragile craft. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Merges, R. P. 2004. ‘From medieval guilds to open source software: informal norms, appropriability institutions, and innovation’, paper presented at Conference on Legal History of Intellectual Property, Madison, WI, 13 November 2004.Google Scholar

Mitterauer, M. 2003. Warum Europa?: Mittelalterliche Grundlagen eines Sonderwegs. Munchen: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar

Moeskop, G. 1985. ‘Het gebruik van gemene gronden in de Antwerpse Kempen tijdens het Ancien Regime’, unpublished PhD thesis, Catholic University of Leuven.Google Scholar

Moll-Murata, C. 2008. ‘Chinese guilds, seventeenth through twentieth centuries: An overview’, International Review for Social History 53, Supplement 16: 213–47.Google Scholar

Neeson, J. M. 2000. ‘English enclosure and British peasants: current debates about rural social structures in Britain c.1750–1870’, Jahrbuch für Wirtschaftsgeschichte 44, 2: 17–32.Google Scholar

Neeson, J. M. 1993. Commoners: common right, enclosure and social change in England, 1700–1820. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ogilvie, S. 2007. ‘“Whatever is, is right”? Economic institutions in pre-industrial Europe’, The Economic History Review 60: 649–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ogilvie, S. 2004. ‘Guilds, efficiency, and social capital: evidence from German proto-industry’, The Economic History Review 57: 287–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oliver, P. E. and Marwell, G. 1988. ‘The paradox of group size in collective action: a theory of the critical mass. II’, American Sociological Review 53: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olson, M. 1965. The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Olsson, M. and Morell, M. 2010. ‘Scandinavia 1750–2000’, in Van Bavel, and Hoyle, (eds.), 2010, pp. 315–47.Google Scholar

Ostmann, A. 1998. ‘External control may destroy the commons’, Rationality and Society 10: 103–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. The Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ostrom, E., Janssen, M. A., and Anderies, J. M. 2007. ‘Going beyond panaceas’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104: 15176–8.Google ScholarPubMed

Paepen, N. 2005. ‘De Aard van de Zes Dorpen 1332–1822. Casusonderzoek naar een Kempische gemene heide (2)’, in Koninklijke Geschied– en Oudheidkundige Kring van de Antwerpse Kempen (ed.), 2005, pp. 123–230.Google Scholar

Paepen, N. 2004. ‘De Aard van de Zes Dorpen 1332–1822. Casusonderzoek naar een Kempische gemene heide (1)’, in Koninklijke Geschied– en Oudheidkundige Kring van de Antwerpse Kempen (ed.), 2004, pp. 5–78.Google Scholar

Panhuysen, B. 2000. Maatwerk: Kleermakers, naaisters, oudkleerkopers en de gilden (1500–1800). Amsterdam: IISG.Google Scholar

Panhuysen, B. 1997. ‘De Amsterdamse en Haarlemse kleermakersgilden en hun concurrenten. De in– en uitsluiting van mededingers op de lokale afzetmarkt in de 17de en 18de eeuw’ in Lis and Soly (eds.), 1997, pp. 127–50.Google Scholar

Parker, W. N. and Jones, E. L. (eds.). 1975. European peasants and their markets: essays in agrarian economic history. Princeton/London: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Pennisi, E. 2005. ‘How did cooperative behavior evolve?’, Science 309: 93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Persson, K. G. 1988. Pre-industrial economic growth: social organization and technological progress in Europe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Posner, E. A. 2000. Law and social norms. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Poteete, A. R., Janssen, M. A., and Ostrom, E. 2010. Working together: Collective action, the commons, and multiple methods in practice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prak, M. 2006. ‘Corporate politics in the low countries: guilds as institutions, 14th to 18th centuries’, in Prak, et al. (eds.), 2006, pp. 74–106.Google Scholar

Prak, M. 2004. ‘Moral order in the world of work: social control and the guilds in Europe’, In Social control in Europe, 1500–1800, in Roodenburg, and Spierenburg, , (eds.), 2004, 176–99.Google Scholar

Prak, M. 1994. Ambachtsgilden vroeger en nu. NEHA-Jaarboek voor economische, bedrijfs– en techniekgeschiedenis 58: 10–33.Google Scholar

Prak, M. 1992. ‘Een verzekerd bestaan’. ambachtslieden, winkeliers en hun gilden in Den Bosch (ca. 1775)’, in De Vries, and Van Tijn, (eds.), 1992, 49–79.Google Scholar

Prak, M., Lis, C., Lucassen, J., and Soly, H. (eds.). 2006. Craft guilds in the early modern low countries: Work, power and representation. Aldershot, Hants, England/Burlington, VT: Ashgate Pub.Google Scholar

Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., and Nanetti, R. Y. 1992. Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Quesnay, F. 1972. Tableau économique (transl. and eds. Kuczynski, M. and Meek, R. L.). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Quesnay, F. 1958. François Quesnay et la physiocratie. Paris: Institut National d’Études Démographiques.Google Scholar

Raub, W., Buskens, V., and Corten, R. 2014. ‘Social dilemmas and cooperation’, in Braun, N. and Saam, N. J. (eds.), Handbuch Modelbildung und Simulation in den Sozialwissenschaften (Wiesbaden: Springer VS), pp. 597–626.Google Scholar

Recht, P. 1950. Les biens communaux du Namurois et leur partage à la fin du XVIIIe siècle. Contribution à l’étude de l’histoire agraire et du droit rural de la Belgique accompagnée d’une description des classes rurales à la fin de l’Ancien Régime. Bruxelles: Bruylant.Google Scholar

Reynolds, S. 1984. Kingdoms and communities in western Europe, 900–1300. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Richardson, G. 2005. ‘Craft guilds and Christianity in late-medieval England. A rational-choice analysis’, Rationality and Society 17: 139–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rodgers, C. P., Straughton, E. A., Winchester, A. J. L., and Pieraccini, M. (eds.). 2011. Contested common land: environmental governance past and present. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar

Rommes, R. N. J. and Van der Spek, J. 2004. Met hand en hart: zeven eeuwen smedengilde en St. Eloyengasthuis in Utrecht 1304–2004. Utrecht: SPOU.Google Scholar

Roodenburg, H. and Spierenburg, P. (eds.). 2004. Social control in Europe, 1500–1800. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar

Roodenburg, M.-C. 1993. De Delftse pottenbakkersnering in de Gouden Eeuw (1575–1675). De produktie van rood pottengoed. Hilversum: Verloren.Google Scholar

Ruwet, J. 1943. L’agriculture et les classes rurales au Pays de Herve sous l’Ancien Régime. Luik: Bibliothèque de la Faculté de philosophie et lettres de l’Université de Liège.Google Scholar

Schofield, P. and Van Bavel, B. (eds). 2009. The development of leasehold in northwestern Europe, c.1200–1600. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar

Shaw-Taylor, L. 2002. ‘The management of common land in the lowlands of Southern England circa 1500 to circa 1850’, in De Moor, , Shaw-Taylor, , and Warde, (eds.), 2002a, pp. 59–86.Google Scholar

Shaw-Taylor, L. 2001a. ‘Labourers, cows, common rights and Parliamentary Enclosure: the evidence of contemporary comment, c.1760–1810’, Past and Present 125: 95–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shaw-Taylor, L. 2001b. ‘Parliamentary Enclosure and the emergence of an English agricultural proletariat’, Journal of Economic History 61: 640–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simons, W. 2001. Cities of ladies: beguine communities in the medieval Low Countries, 1200–1565. Middle Ages Series. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Slicher van Bath, B. H. 1978. Bijdragen tot de agrarische geschiedenis. Antwerpen: Aula.Google Scholar

Slicher van Bath, B. H. 1960. De agrarische geschiedenis van West-Europa (500–1850).Antwerpen/Utrecht: Het Spectrum.Google Scholar

Slokker, N. 2010. Ruggengraat van de stedelijke samenleving. De rol van de gilden in de stad Utrecht, 1528–1818. Amsterdam: Aksant.Google Scholar

Smith, R. M. 1979. ‘Some reflections on the evidence for the origins of the ‘European marriage pattern’ in England’ in Haris, (ed.), 1979, pp. 74–112.Google Scholar

Steiner, Ph. 2003. ‘Physiocracy and French pre-classical political economy’, in Samuels, W. J., Biddle, J. E., and Davis, J. B. (eds.), A companion to the history of economic thought (Chichester: Wiley), pp. 63–77. Available online at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9780470999059.ch5/pdf (Accessed 11 August 2014).Google Scholar

Stiglitz, J. E. 2002. Globalization and its discontents. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Tan, E. S. 2002. ‘‘The bull is half the herd’: property rights and enclosures in England, 1750–1850’, Explorations in Economic History 39: 470–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Te Brake, W. 1981. ‘Revolution and the rural community in the eastern Netherlands’, in Tilly, , Tilly, , and Social Science History Association (eds.), 1981, pp. 53–71.Google Scholar

Tierney, B. 1982. Religion, law, and the growth of constitutional thought, 1150–1650. The Wiles Lectures given at the Queen’s University of Belfast. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tierney, B. and Painter, S. 1983. Western Europe in the Middle Ages, 300–1475. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Tilborghs, E. 1988. ‘De privatisering van de gemeentelijke heide in de Antwerpse Kempen gedurende de negentiende eeuw’, Tijdschrift van de Belgische Vereniging voor Aardrijkskundige Studies 2: 303–17.Google Scholar

Tilborghs, E. 1987. ‘Een nieuwe bestemming voor de woeste gemeentegronden: Een onderzoek naar het lot van de gedurende 1834–1884 geprivatiseerde gemeentegronden in de Antwerpse Kempen’, unpublished PhD thesis, Catholic University of Leuven.Google Scholar

Tilly, L. A., Tilly, C., and Social Science History Association (eds.). 1981. Class conflict and collective action. Beverly Hills, CA/London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Tollebeek, J. 2002. ‘De cultus van 1302: twee eeuwen herinneringen’, in Van Caenegem, (ed.), 2002, pp. 194–239.Google Scholar

Turgot, A. R. J. 1977. The economics of A. R. J. Turgot (transl. and ed. Groenewegen, P. D.). The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Turner, M. 1986. ‘English open fields and enclosures: retardation or productivity improvements’, The Journal of Economic History 46: 669–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turner, M. 1982. ‘Agricultural productivity in England in the eighteenth century: evidence from crop yields’, Economic History Review 35: 489–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turner, M. 1980. English parliamentary enclosure: its historical geography and economic history. Folkestone: Dawson.Google Scholar

Van Bavel, B. J. P. 2014. ‘History as a laboratory to better understand the formation of institutions’, Journal of Institutional Economics. First view online-publication, available at http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S1744137414000216 (Accessed August 11, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Bavel, B. J. P. 2011. ‘Markets for land, labor, and capital in northern Italy and the Low Countries, twelfth to seventeenth centuries’, Journal of Interdisciplinary History 41: 503–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Bavel, B. J. P. 2008a. ‘The emergence and growth of short-term leasing in The Netherlands and other parts of northwestern Europe (eleventh-seventeenth centuries). A chronology and a tentative investigation into its causes’, in Van Bavel, and Schofield, (eds.), 2008, pp. 179–213.Google Scholar

Van Bavel, B. J. P. 2008b. ‘The organization and rise of land and lease markets in northwestern Europe and Italy, c.1000–1800’, Continuity & Change 22: 13–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Bavel, B. J. P. 2006. ‘Rural wage labour in the 16th-century Low Countries: an assessment of the importance and nature of wage labour in the countryside of Holland, Guelders and Flanders’, Continuity & Change, 21: 37–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Bavel, B. J. P., De Moor, T., and Van Zanden, J. L. 2008. ‘The institutional organization of land markets: introduction’, Continuity & Change 23 (Special issue 01 [The institutional organization of land markets]): 9–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Bavel, B. J. P. and Hoyle, R. W. (eds.). 2010. Social relations, property and power. Rural economy and society in north-western Europe, 500–2000. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar

Van Bavel, B. J. P. and Schofield, P. R. (eds.). 2008. The development of leasehold in northwestern Europe, c.1200–1600. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar

Van Bavel, B. J. P. and Thoen, E. (eds.). 2013. Rural societies and environments at risk: Ecology, property rights and social organisation in fragile areas. Turnhout: Brepols.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Bavel, B. J. P. and Thoen, E. 1999. Land productivity and agro-systems in the North Sea Area (Middle Ages– 20th century). Elements for comparison. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar

Van Bavel, B. J. P., Van Cruyningen, P., and Thoen, E. 2010. ‘The Low Countries, 1000–1750’, in Van Bavel, and Hoyle, (eds.), 2010, pp. 169–97.Google Scholar

Van Caenegem, R. C. (ed.). 2002. 1302: Feiten en mythen van de Guldensporenslag. Antwerpen: Mercatorfonds.Google Scholar

Van der Steur, A. G. 1974. ‘Woerdense kleermakers penningen’, Heemtijdinghen: orgaan van de Stichts-Hollandse Vereniging 10: 2–8.Google Scholar

Van Genabeek, J. 1994. De afschaffing der gilden en de voortzetting van hun functies. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar

Van Houtte, J. A. 1977. An economic history of the Low Countries 800–1800. London: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar

Van Houtte, J. A. 1964. Economische en sociale geschiedenis van de lage landen. Zeist: W. de Haan.Google Scholar

Van Laerhoven, F. and Ostrom, E. 2007. ‘Traditions and Trends in the Study of the Commons’, International Journal of the Commons 1: 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Looveren, E. 1983a. ‘De privatisering van de gemeentegronden in de provincie Antwerpen: vier case studies’, Bijdragen Hertogdom Brabant 66: 189–219.Google Scholar

Van Looveren, E. 1983b. ‘De gemeentegronden in de provincie Antwerpen: de privatisering van een eeuwenoud gemeenschapsgoed. Een totaalbeeld en vier case studies’, unpublished PhD thesis, Catholic University of Leuven.Google Scholar

Van Speybrouck, A. 1884. ‘Le Beverhoutsveld’, Annales de la Société d’Émulation De Bruges 35: 155–83.Google Scholar

Van Uytven, R. 1982. ‘Stadsgeschiedenis in het noorden en zuiden’, in Blok, (ed.), 1982, pp. 188–253.Google Scholar

Van Vleuten, L. and Van Zanden, J. L. 2010. ‘Drie golven gilden. Institutionele ontwikkeling van koopliedengilden tot knechtbussen’. Leidschrift 25: 59–71.Google Scholar

Van Weeren, R. and De Moor, T. 2014. ‘Controlling the commoners. Methods to prevent, detect, and sanction free-riding on the Dutch commons in the early modern period’, Agricultural History Review 64: 256–77.Google Scholar

Van Zanden, J. 2005. ‘De verdeling van de Rosengaerdermarke in 1416’, unpublished article, available online at http://www.collective-action.info/sites/default/files/webmaster/CAS_COM_NET_Rosengaerde.pdf (Accessed 11 August 2014).Google Scholar

Van Zanden, J. L. 2009a. The long road to the Industrial Revolution. The European economy in a global perspective, 1000–1800. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Van Zanden, J. L. 2009b. ‘Why the European economy expanded rapidly in a period of political fragmentation’, in Van Zanden, (2009a), 32–68.Google Scholar

Van Zanden, J. L. 2008a. ‘Economic growth in a period of political fragmentation, western Europe 900–1300’, Working Paper, Utrecht University/International Institute of Social History. Available online at http://vkc.library.uu.nl/vkc/seh/research/Lists/Working%20Papers/Attachments/33/VanZanden_EconomicGrowthFragmentation.pdf (Accessed 11 August 2014).Google Scholar

Van Zanden, J. L. 2008b. ‘The road to the Industrial Revolution: hypotheses and conjectures about the medieval origins of the “European Miracle”’, Journal of Global History 3: 337–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Zanden, J. L. 2005. ‘De timmerman, de boekdrukker en het ontstaan van de Europese kenniseconomie’, Tijdschrift voor sociale en economische geschiedenis 2: 115–21.Google Scholar

Van Zanden, J. L. and Prak, M. 2006. ‘Towards an economic interpretation of citizenship. The Dutch Republic between medieval communes and modern nation states’, European Review of Economic History 10: 11–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vandenbroeke, C. 1975. Agriculture et alimentation dans les Pays-Bas Autrichiens. Gent-Leuven: Belgisch Centrum voor Landelijke Geschiedenis.Google Scholar

Vanhaute, E. 1993. ‘Eigendomsverhoudingen in de Belgische en Vlaamse landbouw tijdens de 18de en 19de eeuw’, Belgisch Tijdschrift voor Nieuwste Geschiedenis 1–2: 185–226.Google Scholar

Vanhaute, E. and Thoen, E. 1999. ‘The “Flemish husbandry”’ at the edge: the farming system on small holdings in the middle of the 19th century’, in van Van Bavel, and Thoen, (eds.), 1999, pp. 271–96.Google Scholar

Verhulst, A. 1980. ‘Le paysage rural en Flandre interieure: son évolution entre le IXième et XIIIième siècle’, Revue du Nord 71: 11–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Verhulst, A. 1966. Histoire du paysage rural en flandre de l’époque romaine au XVIIIe siècle. Brussel: Coll. Notre Passé.Google Scholar

Verhulst, A. 1957. ‘Het platteland’, in Flandria nostra: ons land en ons volk, zijn standen door de tijden heen, Vol. 1, pp. 11–42. Antwerpen: Standaard.Google Scholar

Verhulst, A., and Blok., D. P. 1981. ‘De agrarische nederzettingen’, in Verhulst, A. and Blok, D. P. (eds.), Algemene geschiedenis der Nederlanden, Vol. 1 (Haarlem: Fibula-Van Dishoeck), pp. 153–64.Google Scholar

Vivier, N. 2002. ‘The management and use of the commons in France in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries’, in De Moor, , Shaw-Taylor, , and Warde, (eds.), 2002a, pp. 143–72.Google Scholar

Vliebergh, E. 1908. De Kempen in de 19e en ‘t begin der 20e eeuw. Ieper: Callewaert-de Meulenaere.Google Scholar

Westlake, H. F. 1919. The parish gilds of mediaeval England. London/New York: Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge/Macmillan Company.Google Scholar

Wiesner, M. E. 1991. ‘Wandervögels and women: Journeymen's concepts of masculinity in early modern Germany’, Journal of Social History 24: 767–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Willems, H. 1962. ‘De ontginningen van de Kempen in de achttiende eeuw’, unpublished PhD thesis, Catholic University of Leuven.Google Scholar

Winchester, A. J. L. 2013. ‘Property rights, ‘good neighbourhood’ and sustainability: the management of common land in England and Wales, 1235–1965’, in Van Bavel, and Thoen, (eds.), 2013, pp. 301–29.Google Scholar

Winchester, A. J. L. 2002. ‘Upland commons in northern England’, in De Moor, , Shaw-Taylor, , and Warde, (eds.), 2002a, pp. 33–58.Google Scholar

Yelling, J. A. 1977. Common field and enclosure in England, 1450–1850. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yildirim, O. 2009. ‘Ottoman guilds in the early modern era’, in Lucassen, , De Moor, , and Zanden, Van (eds.), 2009, pp. 75–95.Google Scholar

Zuijderduijn, C. J. 2009. Medieval capital markets. Markets for renten, state formation and private investment in Holland (1300–1550). Global Economic History Series, 2. Leiden/Boston: Brill Academic Publishers.Google Scholar