Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- List of contributors
- 1 Introduction
- PART I ORIGINS AND EVOLUTION
- 2 Origins of the dog: The archaeological evidence
- 3 Origins of the dog: Genetic insights into dog domestication
- 4 Evolution of working dogs
- PART II BEHAVIOR, COGNITION AND TRAINING
- PART III DOG-HUMAN INTERACTIONS
- PART IV LIFE ON THE MARGINS
- Index
- Plate section
- References
2 - Origins of the dog: The archaeological evidence
from PART I - ORIGINS AND EVOLUTION
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 December 2016
Edited by
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- List of contributors
- 1 Introduction
- PART I ORIGINS AND EVOLUTION
- 2 Origins of the dog: The archaeological evidence
- 3 Origins of the dog: Genetic insights into dog domestication
- 4 Evolution of working dogs
- PART II BEHAVIOR, COGNITION AND TRAINING
- PART III DOG-HUMAN INTERACTIONS
- PART IV LIFE ON THE MARGINS
- Index
- Plate section
- References
Summary
Introduction
After more than a century of argument and discussion, it is now generally agreed that the single progenitor of all domestic dogs, ancient and modern, was the grey wolf, Canis lupus, but when and where domestication first took place is still much argued about. Was the wolf domesticated in one part of the world or in many regions over its huge range covering the Northern Hemisphere, and what exactly constitutes a domestic dog? The word “domestic” means simply “of the home,” so any tamed animal may be said to be domestic, but if the term is to be used as a scientific descriptive it must have a biological definition, and there must be a clear separation between a wild species and its domestic derivative. A domestic dog is not a tamed wolf but is it a separate species?
To paraphrase the most frequently used definition (see e.g. Lawrence, 1995, p. 551): a species is a population of animals that breeds freely and produces fertile offspring. If the hybrid offspring are infertile then the parents are separate species, for example the horse and the donkey. However, many animals that are normally considered to be separate species will interbreed with fertile offspring, as will all the wild species of the genus Canis, these being the wolf, coyote, and the several species of jackal. A more useful definition is the biological species concept which states that, “species are groups of interbreeding natural populations that are reproductively isolated from other such groups” (Mayr, 1966, p. 19). Using this definition, all fully domesticated animals can be classified as separate species from their wild progenitors, from which they are reproductively isolated. The dog is no longer a tamed wolf but, as a result of selective breeding under human control, it has evolved into a new species, named by Linnaeus, Canis familiaris, which by further reproductive isolation and under the influence of both natural and artificial selection produces new breeds (Clutton-Brock, 2012).
Precursors of the dog
With the increasing care and advanced technology used in the excavation of archaeological sites during the second half of the twentieth century, the bones of wolves have been found in association with those of early hominins from as early as the Middle Pleistocene period.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Domestic DogIts Evolution, Behavior and Interactions with People, pp. 7 - 21Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
(1920). Dogs of American Aborigines, Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, 63: 431–517.Google Scholar
(1937). Palaeontology: the fossil fauna of the Wady-el Mughara Caves. Vol. 1, Part II, In The Stone Age of Mount Carmel, eds. & . Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 139–237.Google Scholar
(1992). The Covenant of the Wild: Why Animals Chose Domestication. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
(2001). Lapita dogs and singing dogs and the history of the dog in New Guinea. In The Archaeology of Lapita Dispersal in Oceania: Papers from the Fourth Lapita Conference, Canberra, eds. , & . Canberra: Pandanus Books, pp. 183–201.Google Scholar
(1962). Near Eastern canids and the affinities of the Natufian dogs. Zeitschrift für Tierzüchtung und Züchtungsbiologie, 76: 326–33.Google Scholar
(1969). Carnivore remains from the excavations of the Jericho Tell. In The Domestication and Exploitation of Plants and Animals, eds. & . London: Duckworth, pp. 337–45.Google Scholar
(1988). The carnivore remains excavated at Fell's Cave in 1970. In Travels and Archaeology in South Chile by Junius B. Bird, ed. . Iowa City: University of Iowa Press, pp. 188–95.Google Scholar
(1993). The spread of domestic animals in Africa. In The Archaeology of Africa: Food, Metals and Towns, eds. , , & . London: Routledge, pp. 61–70.Google Scholar
(1999). A Natural History of Domesticated Mammals, edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press/The Natural History Museum.Google Scholar
(2012). Animals as Domesticates: A World View Through History. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar
& (1994). Hot dogs: comestible canids in Preclassic Maya culture at Cuello, Belize. Journal of Archaeological Science, 21: 819–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (1994). Changes in the skull morphology of the Arctic wolf, Canis lupus arctos, during the twentieth century. Journal of Zoology, London, 233: 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
& (1990). New osteological and C-isotope evidence on Mesolithic dogs: companions to hunters and fishers at Star Carr, Seamer Carr and Kongemose. Journal of Archaeological Science, 17: 643–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006). Rhythms of Life: Thyroid Hormone and the Origin of Species. Victoria, B.C.: Trafford.Google Scholar
& (2012). Comments on et al.,
Journal of Archaeological Science
36,
2009 “Fossil dogs and wolves from Palaeolithic sites in Belgium, the Ukraine and Russia: osteometry, ancient DNA and stable isotopes”, and , , and ,
Journal of Archaeological Science
39,Google Scholar
2012 “Palaeolithic dog skulls at the Gravettian Předmostí site, the Czech Republic”. Journal of Archaeological Science, 39: 2797–801.
& (1978). Evidence for domestication of the dog 12,000 years ago in the Natufian of Israel. Nature, 276 (5688): 608–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1994). Early domesticated dogs of the Near East. Journal of Archaeological Science, 21: 633–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1961). On a find of a Preboreal domestic dog (Canis familiaris L.) from Star Carr, Yorkshire, with remarks on other Mesolithic dogs. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 27: 35–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1969). Une Cabane de chasseuse acheuleenes dans la Grotte du Lazaret à Nice. Archeologia, 28: 26–33.Google Scholar
(1996). Malocclusion in the jaws of captive bred Arctic Wolves. Canis lupus arctos. Canadian Field-Naturalist, 110: 683–687.Google Scholar
& (1954). Faunal remains. In Excavations at Star Carr an Early Mesolithic Site at Seamer near Scarborough, Yorkshire, ed. . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 70–95.Google Scholar
(2005). Ichnologie generale de la grotte Chauvet. Bulletin de la Societé Prehistorique Française, 102: 103–108.Google Scholar
, , & (2012). Palaeolithic dog skulls at the Gravettian Predmostí site, the Czech Republic. Journal of Archaeological Science, 39: 184–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ,
et al. (2009). Fossil dogs and wolves from Palaeolithic sites in Belgium, the Ukraine and Russia: osteometry, ancient DNA and stable isotopes. Journal of Archaeological Science, 36: 473–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
& (1990). Foxes, Wolves, Jackals, and Dogs: an Action Plan for the Conservation of Canids. Gland, Switzerland: International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources.Google Scholar
(1973). Some comparative features of the skulls of wolves (Canis lupus Linn.) and pariah dogs (Canis familiaris Linn.) from the Arabian Peninsula and neighbouring lands. Bonner Zoologische Beiträge, 24: 185–91.Google Scholar
(1990). Domestication: the Decline of Environmental Appreciation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2008). Hunting with dogs in Nicaragua: An optimal foraging approach. Current Anthropology, 49: 935–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ,
et al. (2012). Rethinking dog domestication by integrating genetics, archeology, and biogeography. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, http://doi/10.1073/pnas.1203005109
CrossRef
& (1983). The dogs of Jarmo. In Prehistoric Archaeology along the Zagros Flank, eds. , , , & . Chicago, IL: The Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago, pp. 485–94.Google Scholar
Ed. (1995). Henderson's Dictionary of Biological Terms, edition. London: Longman Group.Google Scholar
(1979). The! Kung San: Men, Women, and Work in a Foraging Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
, ,
et al. (2002). Ancient DNA evidence for Old World origin of New World dogs, Science, 298: 1613–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, ,
et al. (2009). Coat color variation at the beginning of horse domestication. Science, 324: 485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, ,
et al. (2011). A unique human-fox burial from a pre-Natufian cemetery in the Levant (Jordan). PLoS ONE, 6: e15815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1965). The association between Australian Aborigines and dingoes. In Man, Culture, and Animals: the Role of Animals in Human Ecological Adjustments, eds. & . Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science, No. 78, pp. 7–26.Google Scholar
& eds. (2003). Colyer's Variations and Diseases of the Teeth of Animals, revised edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
& (1976). Relative antiquity of human occupation and extinct fauna at Madura Cave, south-eastern Australia. Mankind, 10: 175–80.Google Scholar
(2003). After the Ice: A Global Human History 20,000–5000 BC. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolsen.Google Scholar
, , & (1984). Mammalian remains of the earliest Jomon period at the rockshelter site of Tochibara, Nagano Pref., Japan. Journal of Growth, 23: 40–56.Google Scholar
(1992). Size, shape and development in the evolution of the domestic dog. Journal of Archaeological Science, 19: 181–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1984). The first known domestication of wolves in central Europe. In Animals and Archaeology: 4. Husbandry in Europe. eds. & . Oxford: BAR International Series, 227, pp. 23–6.Google Scholar
& (2012). A “new” Palaeolithic dog from Central Europe. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 22: 127–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1981). Das älteste Haustier des Menschen. Unterkiefer eines hundes aus dem Magdaléniengrab von Bonn-Oberkassel. Bonn: Das Reinische Landesmuseum.Google Scholar
, &
et al. (2011). The power of paradigms: examining the evidential basis for early to mid-Holocene pigs and pottery in Melanesia. Journal of Pacific Archaeology, 2: 1–25.Google Scholar
(1977). The Chinese wolf, ancestor of New World dogs. Science, 197: 553–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1985). Origins of the Domestic Dog: the Fossil Record. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
, ,
et al. (2011). A 33,000 year-old incipient dog from the Altai Mountains of Siberia: Evidence of the earliest domestication disrupted by the Last Glacial Maximum. PLoS ONE, 6: e22821. http://doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022821
CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, ,
et al. (2009). MtDNA data indicate a single origin for dogs south of Yangtze River, less than 16,300 years ago, from numerous wolves. Molecular Biology and Evolution
26: 2849–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
& eds. (1999). Boxgrove: A Middle Pleistocene hominid site at Eartham Quarry, Boxgrove, West Sussex. English Heritage Archaeological Report, 17. London: English Heritage.Google Scholar
, &
et al. (2004). A detailed picture of the origin of the Australian dingo, obtained from the study of mitochondrial DNA. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101: 12387–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1994). The hair of the dog: the identification of a coast Salish dog-hair blanket from Yale, British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Archaeology, 18: 57–76.Google Scholar
1997. A History of Dogs in the Early Americas. New Haven, CT & London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
& (2009). A review of the relationship between indigenous Australians, dingoes (Canis dingo) and domestic dogs (Canis familiaris). Anthrozoös, 22: 111–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ,
et al. (2011). On the origin of a domesticated species: identifying the parent population of Russian silver foxes (Vulpes vulpes). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 103: 168–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1989). Jäger und Schamen: Bedburg-Königshoven ein Wohnplatz am Niederrhein vor 10000 Jahren. Mainz: Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums.Google Scholar
& (1991). Body size diminution under domestication: unconscious selection in primeval domesticates. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 10: 54–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
& (1997). Two new dogs, and other Natufian dogs, from the southern Levant. Journal of Archaeological Science, 24: 65–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (2004). An experiment on fox domestication and debatable issues of evolution of the dog. Russian Journal of Genetics, 40: 644–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
& (1974). The fauna from the terminal Pleistocene of Palegawra Cave, a Zarzian occupation site in northeastern Iraq. Fieldiana Anthropology, 63: 81–146.Google Scholar
, ,
et al. (1997). Multiple and ancient origins of the dog. Science, 276: 1687–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, ,
et al. (2010). Genome-wide SNP and haplotype analyses reveal a rich history underlying dog domestication, Nature, 464: 898–902.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1986). Cranial morphology of domestic and wild canids: The influence of development on morphological change. Evolution, 40: 243–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1894). Die Einwirkung der Gefangenschaft auf die Gestaltung des Wolfsschädels. [The influence of captivity on the development of wolf skulls.]
Zoologische Jahrbucher. Jena Abteilung fur Systematik Bd. 3: 773–822.Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by