Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-mzsfj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-14T20:31:11.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Executive perceptions

Probing the institutionalization of organizational downsizing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2014

William Mckinley
Affiliation:
Southern Illinois University
Jasmin Chia-Jung Lin
Affiliation:
Robert Morris University
Cary L. Cooper
Affiliation:
Lancaster University
Alankrita Pandey
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Arlington
James Campbell Quick
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Arlington
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Organizational downsizing surrounds us. There was a significant surge in organizational downsizing in public sector organizations in the late 1970s and early 1980s (Bozeman and Slusher, 1979; Glassberg, 1978; Levine, 1978). In the late 1980s and the 1990s, organizational downsizing also became prominent in the private sector (Freeman and Cameron, 1993). By one estimate (Kozlowski, Chao, Smith, and Hedlund, 1993), 66 percent of firms with more than 500 employees intentionally reduced their workforces during the latter half of the 1980s. During that entire decade, several million manufacturing jobs were lost through downsizing (Kozlowski et al., 1993). According to Littler and Innes (2004), the pace of private sector downsizing in the 1990s was similar, with 68 percent of organizations represented in a 1992 British Institute of Management Survey reporting a delayering or restructuring exercise in the previous five years.

More recently, organizational downsizing has undergone another renaissance in the public sector, with deficit-ridden state and municipal governments in the United States laying off teachers, furloughing workers, and taking other workforce reduction measures in an attempt to shrink the size and cost of government (e.g., Medina, 2011; Otterman, 2011). In Europe, the bursting of the housing and banking bubbles have produced implosions in economies, such as those of Ireland and Spain, and these implosions have led to higher interest rates on government debt, austerity policies, and intense bond market pressure for downsizing of government work forces.

Information

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×