Abi-Saab, G., ‘Introduction: A Meta-Question’, in Abi-Saab, G., Keith, K., Marceau, G., Marquet, C. (eds.), Evolutionary Interpretation and International Law (London: Hart Publishing, 2019).Google Scholar

Ago, R., ‘La colpa nell’illecito internazionale’, in Scritti Giuridici in Onore di Santi Romano (Padua: CEDAM, 1940), vol. 3.Google Scholar

Ago, R., ‘Le délit international’ (1939) 68 Recueil des Course de l’Académie de Droit International de la Haye 415.Google Scholar

Ago, R., ‘Positive Law and International Law’ (1957) 51 American Journal of International Law 691.Google Scholar

Ambrus, M., Rayfuse, R., Werner, W. (eds.), Risk and the Regulation of Uncertainty in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Andenas, M., Chiussi, L., ‘Cohesion, Convergence and Coherence of International Law’, in Wouters, J., Andenas, M., Fitzmaurice, M., Tanzi, A. (eds.), General Principles and the Coherence of International Law (Leiden: Brill, 2019).Google Scholar

Anzilotti, D., ‘La responsabilité internationale des Etats à raison des dommages soufferts par des étrangers’ (1906) 13 Revue Générale de Droit International Public 5.Google Scholar

Anzilotti, D., Teoria generale della responsabilità dello Stato, Part 1 (Florence: Lumachi Libraio Editore, 1902).Google Scholar

Arangio-Ruiz, G., ‘Dualism Revisited: International Law and Interindividual Law’ (2003) 86 (Supplement to issue 1) Rivista di diritto internazionale, 909.Google Scholar

Arangio-Ruiz, G., ‘State Fault and the Forms and Degrees of International Responsibility: Questions of Attribution and Relevance’, in Mélanges Michel Virally: Le droit international au service de la paix de la justice et du développement (Paris: Pedone, 1991).Google Scholar

Arangio-Ruiz, G., ‘State Responsibility Revisited: The Factual Nature of the Attribution of Conduct to the State’ (2017) 100 (Supplement to issue 1) Rivista di diritto internazionale 1.Google Scholar

Arangio-Ruiz, V., Istituzioni di Diritto Romano (15th ed., Naples: Jovene Editore, 2006).Google Scholar

Arcari, M., ‘La responsabilité en droit international: un “systeme”?’, in Tomkiewicz, V. (ed.), Organisation mondiale du commerce et responsabilité (Paris: Pedone, 2014).Google Scholar

Arcari, M., ‘Le juge et la codification du droit de la responsabilité: quelques remarques concernant l’application judiciaire des articles de la CDI sur la responsabilité de l’État pour fait internationalement illicite’, in Boschiero, N., Scovazzi, T., Pitea, C., Ragni, C., International Courts and the Development of International Law: Essays in Honour of Tullio Treves (The Hague: Asser Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Arnardóttir, O. M., ‘The “Procedural Turn” under the European Convention on Human Rights and Presumptions of Convention Compliance’ (2017) 15 International Journal of Constitutional Law 9.Google Scholar

Aust, H. P., ‘The UN Human Rights Due Diligence Policy: An Effective Mechanism against Complicity of Peacekeeping Forces?’ (2014) 20 Journal of Conflict & Security Law 61.Google Scholar

Aust, H. P., Complicity in the Law of State Responsibility (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Aust, H. P., Feihle, P., ‘Due Diligence in the History of the Codification of the Law of State Responsibility’, in Krieger, H., Peters, A., Kreuzer, L. (eds.), Due Diligence in the International Legal Order (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020).Google Scholar

Azaria, D., Treaties on Transit of Energy via Pipelines and Countermeasures (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Baade, B., ‘Due Diligence and the Duty to Protect Human Rights’, in Krieger, H., Peters, A., Kreuzer, L. (eds.), Due Diligence in the International Legal Order (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020).Google Scholar

Barnidge, R., ‘The Due Diligence Principle Under International Law’ (2006) 8 International Community Law Review 81.Google Scholar

Barnidge, R., Non-State Actors and Terrorism: Applying the Law of State Responsibility and the Due Diligence Principle (Berlin: Springer, 2008).Google Scholar

Bartolini, G., ‘Cultural Heritage and Disasters’, in Francioni, F., Vrdoljak, A. F. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Cultural Heritage Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020).Google Scholar

Bartolini, G., ‘Il concetto di “controllo” sulle attivitá di individui quale presupposto della responsabilitá dello stato’, in Spinedi, M., Gianelli, A., Alaimo, M. L. (eds.), La codificazione della responsabilitá internazionale degli Stati alla prova dei fatti (Milan: Giuffré, 2006).Google Scholar

Bartolini, G., ‘The Failure of “Core Capacities” under the WHO International Health Regulations’ (2020) 70 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 233.Google Scholar

Bartolini, G., ‘The Historical Roots of the Due Diligence Standard’, in Krieger, H., Peters, A., Kreuzer, L. (eds.), Due Diligence in the International Legal Order (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020).Google Scholar

Beck, U., Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, trans. M. Ritter (London: Sage Publishing, 1992).Google Scholar

Becker, T., Terrorism and the State: Rethinking the Rules of State Responsibility (Portland: Hart Publishing, 2006).Google Scholar

Belli, P., De Re Militari et Bello Tractactus, trans. H. C. Nutting, The Classics of International Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1936).Google Scholar

Benninger-Budel, C. (ed.), Due Diligence and Its Application to Protect Women from Violence (Leiden: Brill, 2008).Google Scholar

Bennouna, M., ‘Le droit international entre la lettre et l’esprit: cours général de droit international public’ (2017) 383 Recueil des Course de l’Académie de Droit International de la Haye 1.Google Scholar

Berkes, A., ‘The Standard of “Due Diligence” as a Result of Interchange between the Law of Armed Conflict and General International Law’ (2018) 23 Journal of Conflict and Security Law 433.Google Scholar

Besson, S., ‘Les obligations de protection de droit fondamentaux: un essai en dogmatique comparative’ (2003) 1 Revue de Droit Suisse 49.Google Scholar

Besson, S., ‘The Extraterritoriality of the European Convention on Human Rights: Why Human Rights Depend on Jurisdiction and What Jurisdiction Amounts To’ (2012) 25 Leiden Journal of International Law 857.Google Scholar

Besson, S., ‘La “Due Diligence” en droit international’ (2020) 409 Recueil des Course de l’Académie de Droit International de la Haye 153.Google Scholar

Bingham, T., ‘The Alabama Claims Arbitration’ (2005) 54 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 1.Google Scholar

Birnie, P., Boyle, A., Redgwell, C., International Law and the Environment (3rd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Blanco, S. M., Full Protection and Security in International Law (Berlin: Springer, 2018).Google Scholar

Bleckmann, A., ‘General Theory of Obligations under Public International Law’ (1995) 38 German Yearbook of International Law 26.Google Scholar

Bodansky, D., Brunnée, J., Hey, E., ‘International Environmental Law: Mapping the Field’, in Bodansky, D., Brunnée, J., Hey, E. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Bodansky, D., Crook, J. R., ‘Symposium: The ILC’S State Responsibility Articles Introduction and Overview’ (2002) 96 American Journal of International Law 773.Google Scholar

Bonafé, B., Palchetti, P., ‘Relying on General Principles in International Law’, in Brölmann, C., Radi, Y. (eds.), Research Handbook on the Theory and Practice of International Lawmaking (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2016).Google Scholar

Bonfanti, A., ‘Attacchi cibernetici in tempo di pace e intrusioni nelle elezioni presidenziali alla luce del diritto internazionale’ (2019) 102 Rivista di diritto internazionale 694.Google Scholar

Bonnitcha, J., McCorquodale, R., ‘The Concept of “Due Diligence” in the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights’ (2017) 28 European Journal of International Law 899.Google Scholar

Boon, K. E., ‘Are Control Tests Fit for The Future? The Slippage Problem in Attribution Doctrines’ (2014) 15 Melbourne Journal of International Law 330.Google Scholar

Borchard, E. M., ‘Theoretical Aspects of the International Responsibility of States’ (1929) 1 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 225.Google Scholar

Borchard, E. M., The Diplomatic Protection of Citizens Abroad (New York: The Banks Law Publishing Company, 1915).Google Scholar

Bowman, M., Davies, P., Redgwell, C., Lyster’s International Wildlife Law (2nd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Boyle, A., ‘Liability for Injurious Consequence of Acts not Prohibited by International Law’, in Crawford, J., Pellet, A., Olleson, S., Parlet, K. (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Boyle, A., ‘State Responsibility and International Liability for Injurious Consequences of Acts not Prohibited by International Law: A Necessary Distinction?’ (1990) 39 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyle, A., Chinkin, C., The Making of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Brems, E., ‘Procedural Protection’, in Brems, E., Gerards, J. (eds.), Shaping Rights in the ECHR : The Role of the European Court of Human Rights in Determining the Scope of Human Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Brown, D., ‘Use of Force Against Terrorism After September 11th: State Responsibility, Self- Defence and Other Responses’ (2003–2004) 11 Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law 13.Google Scholar

Brownlie, I., Principles of International Law (6th ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Brownlie, I., System of the Law of Nations, State Responsibility, Part I (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983).Google Scholar

Brunnée, J., ‘International Environmental Law and Community Interests’, in Benvenisti, E., Nolte, G. (eds.), Community Interests Across International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar

Brunnée, J., ‘Procedure and Substance in International Environmental Law’ (2020) 405 Recueil des Course de l’Académie de Droit International de la Haye 87.Google Scholar

Buergenthal, T., ‘Self-Executing and Non-Self-Executing Treaties in National and International Law’ (1992) 235 Recueil des Course de l’Académie de Droit International de la Haye 303.Google Scholar

Calvo, C., Le droit international theorique et pratique (Paris: Nabu Press, 1923).Google Scholar

Campbell, E., Dominic, E., Stadnik, S., Wu, Y., ‘Due Diligence Obligations of International Organizations under International Law’ (2018) 50 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 541.Google Scholar

Cannizzaro, E., ‘Considerazioni in merito al ruolo della ragionevolezza e della proporzionalità nel diritto internazionale’ (2002) 7 Ars Interpretandi 347.Google Scholar

Cannizzaro, E., Il principio della proporzionalità nell’ordinamento internazionale (Milan: Giuffrè, 2000).Google Scholar

Carnelutti, F., Teoria generale del diritto (Naples: Edizioni Scientifiche, 1999).Google Scholar

Caron, D., ‘The Basis of Responsibility: Attribution and Other Trans-Substantive Rules’, in Lillich, R. B., Magraw, D. B. (eds.), The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal: Its Contribution to the Law of State Responsibility (New York: Transnational Publishers, 1998).Google Scholar

Cassella, S., ‘Le travaux de la Commission du droit international sur la responsabilité internationale et le standard de due diligence’ in Cassella, S. (ed.), Le standard de due diligence et la responsabilité internationale (Paris: Pedone, 2018).Google Scholar

Cazala, J., Le principe de précaution en droit international (Paris: Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence, 2006).Google Scholar

Cheng, B., General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Chinkin, C., ‘A Critique of the Public/Private Dimension’ (1999) 10 European Journal of International Law 387.Google Scholar

Chinkin, C., ‘Normative Development in the International Legal System’, in Shelton, D. (ed.), Commitment and Compliance: The Role of Non-binding Norms in the International Legal System (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2003).Google Scholar

Chircop, L., ‘A Due Diligence Standard of Attribution in Cyberspace’ (2018) 67 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chiussi, L., ‘Corporate Human Rights Due Diligence: From Process to the Principle’, in Buscemi, M., Lazzerini, N., Magi, L., Russo, D. (eds.), Legal Sources in Business and Human Rights: Evolving Dynamics in International and European Law (Leiden: Brill, 2020).Google Scholar

Clapham, A., Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Actors (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Combacau, J., ‘La responsabilité internationale’, in Thierry, H., Combacau, J., Sur, S., Vallée, C. (eds.), Droit International Public (Paris: Editions Mont-Chrestien, 1981).Google Scholar

Combacau, J., ‘Obligations de résultat et obligations de comportement: Quelques questions et pas de réponse’, in Le droit international: unité et diversité. Melanges offerts à Paul Reuter (Paris: Pedone, 1981).Google Scholar

Condorelli, L., ‘The Imputability to States of Acts of International Terrorism’ (1989) 19 Israel Yearbook of Human Rights 233.Google Scholar

Condorelli, L., Kress, C., ‘The Rules of Attribution: General Considerations’, in Crawford, J., Pellet, A., Olleson, S., Parlet, K. (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Conforti, B., ‘Obblighi di mezzo e obblighi di risultato nelle convenzioni di diritto uniforme’ (1989) 25 Rivista di diritto privato e processuale 373.Google Scholar

Corten, O., ‘La “complicité” dans le droit de la responsabilité internationale: Un concept inutile?’ (2011) 57 Annuaire Français de Droit International 57.Google Scholar

Corten, O., L’utilisation du “raisonnable” par le juge international: Discours juridique, raison et contraditions (Bruxelles: Bruylant, 1997).Google Scholar

Corten, O., ‘Reasonableness’ in Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013).Google Scholar

Corten, O., ‘The Notion of “Reasonable” in International Law: Legal Discourse, Reason and Contradiction’ (1999) 48 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 613.Google Scholar

Corten, O., Klein, O., ‘The limits of complicity as a ground for responsibility: Lessons learned from the Corfu Channel case’, in Bannelier, K., Christakis, T., Heathcote, S. (eds.), The ICJ and the Evolution of International Law: The Enduring Impact of the Corfu Channel Case (London: Routledge, 2012).Google Scholar

Crawford, J., ‘The ILC’s Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts: A Retrospect’ (2002) 96 American Journal of International Law 874.Google Scholar

Crawford, J., ‘The System of International Responsibility’, in Crawford, J., Pellet, A., Olleson, S. (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Crawford, J., Grant, T., Messineo, F., ‘Toward an International Law of Responsibility: Early Doctrine’, in Boisson de Chazournes, L. and Kohen, M. (eds.), International Law and the Quest of its Implementation: Liber Amicorum Vera Gowlland-Debbas (Leiden: Brill, 2010).Google Scholar

Crawford, J., State Responsibility: The General Part (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Crawford, J., The International Law Commission’s Articles on State Responsibility: Introduction, Text and Commentaries (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Crawford, J., Watkins, J., ‘International Responsibility’, in Besson, S., Tasioulas, J. (eds.), The Philosophy of International Law (New York: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Crema, L., ‘The Interpretative Work of Treaty Bodies: How They Look at Evolutionary Interpretation, and How Other Courts Look at Them’, in Abi-Saab, G., Keith, K., Marceau, G., Marquet, C. (eds.), Evolutionary Interpretation and International Law (London: Hart Publishing, 2019).Google Scholar

d’Argent, P., ‘Les principes généraux à la Cour internationale de Justice’, in Besson, S., Pichonnaz, P. (eds.), Les principes de droit européen (Paris: Librairie Général de Droit et de Jurisprudence, 2011).Google Scholar

d’Argent, P., ‘Reparation, Cessation, Assurance and Guarantees of Non-Repetition’, in Nollkaemper, A., Plakokefalos, I. (eds.), Principles of Shared Responsibilities in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

d’Argent, P. , ‘State Organs Placed at the Disposal of the UN, Effective Control, Wrongful Abstention and Dual Attribution of Conduct’ (2014) 1 QIL–Questions of International Law 17.Google Scholar

d’Argent, P. , De Vaucleroy, A. , ‘Le contenu de l’omission illicite: La non utilisation de moyens raisonnables’, in Cassella, S (ed.), Le standard de due diligence et la responsabilité internationale (Paris: Pedone, 2018).Google Scholar

d’Aspremont, J., ‘The Multidimensional Process of Interpretation’, in Bianchi, A., Peat, D., Windsor, M. (eds.), Interpretation in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Dahl, R. A., ‘The Concept of Power’ (1957) 2 Behavioral Science 201.Google Scholar

Dailler, P., Forteau, M., Pellet, A., Droit International Public (Paris: Librairie Général de Droit et de Jurisprudence, 2009).Google Scholar

Dannenbaum, T., ‘Public Power and Preventive Responsibility’, in Nollkaemper, A., Plakokefalos, I. (eds.), Distribution of Responsibilities in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Daugirdas, K., ‘Member States’ Due Diligence Obligations to Supervise International Organizations’, in Krieger, H., Peters, A., Kreuzer, L. (eds.), Due Diligence in the International Legal Order (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020).Google Scholar

David, E., ‘Primary and Secondary Rules’, in Crawford, J., Pellet, A., Olleson, S., Parlett, K. (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

De Brabandere, E., ‘Host States’ Due Diligence Obligations in International Investment Law’ (2015) 42 Syracuse Journal of International and Comparative Law 319.Google Scholar

De Sena, P., ‘Condotta di singoli organi e condotta dell’apparato statale in tema di colpa nell’illecito internazionale’ (1988) 71 Rivista di diritto internazionale 525.Google Scholar

De Sena, P., ‘La “due diligence” et le lien entre le sujet et le risqué qu’il faut prévenir: quelques observations’, in Cassella, S. (ed.), Le standard de due diligence et la responsabilité internationale (Paris: Pedone, 2018).Google Scholar

De Sena, P., La nozione di giurisdizione statale nei trattati sui diritti dell’uomo (Turin: Giappichelli, 2020).Google Scholar

De Vaucleroy, A., ‘Les obligations de comportement en droit international public. Due diligence et responsabilité internationale’, PhD thesis, Université catholique de Louvain (2021).Google Scholar

Deeks, A., ‘Unwilling or Unable: toward a Normative Framework for Extraterritorial Self-Defence’ (2012) 53 Virginia Journal of International Law 483.Google Scholar

Delerue, F., Cyber Operations and International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020).Google Scholar

Demogue, R., Traité des Obligations en General (Paris: Librairie Arthur Rousseau, 1925).Google Scholar

Desierto, D. A., ‘Due Diligence in World Bank and Project Financing’, in Krieger, H., Peters, A., Kreuzer, L. (eds.), Due Diligence in the International Legal Order (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020).Google Scholar

Diggelmann, O., ‘Fault in the Law of State Responsibility: Pragmatism ad Infinitum’ (2006) 49 German Yearbook of International Law 293.Google Scholar

Dinstein, Y., War, Aggression and Self-Defence (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Donati, D., I trattati internazionali nel diritto costituzionale (Turin: Unione tipografico-editrice torinese, 1906).Google Scholar

Dubuisson, F., ‘Vers un Renforcement des Obligations de Diligence en Matière de Lutte Contre le Terrorism ?’, in Christakis-Bannelier, K., Christakis, T., Corten, O., Delcourt, B. (eds.), Le Droit International Face au Terrorisme (Paris: Pedone 2002).Google Scholar

Dupuy, P. M., ‘Faute de l’Etat et “fait internationalement illicite”’ (1987) 5 Droit 54.Google Scholar

Dupuy, P. M., ‘Infraction’, in Répertoire de Droit International (Paris: Dalloz, 1999).Google Scholar

Dupuy, P. M., ‘La diligence due dans le droit international et la résponsabilité’ in Organisation de coopération and développement économique (ed.), Aspects Juridiques de la Pollution Transfrontière (Paris: OECD, 1977).Google Scholar

Dupuy, P. M., ‘Le fait générateur de la responsabilité internationale des Etats’ (1984) 188 Recueil des Course de l’Académie de Droit International de la Haye 9.Google Scholar

Dupuy, P. M., ‘Reviewing the Difficulties of Codification: On Ago’s Classification of Obligations of Means and Obligations of Result in Relation to State Responsibility’ (1999) 10 European Journal of International Law 371.Google Scholar

Dupuy, P. M., Hoss, C., ‘Trail Smelter and International Terrorism: International Mechanisms to Combat Transboundary Harm’, in Walter, C., Vöneky, C., Schorkopf, F., Roeben, V. (eds.), Terrorism as a Challenge for National and International Law: Security versus Liberty? (Berlin: Springer, 2004).Google Scholar

Duvic-Paoli, L. A., The Prevention Principle in International Environmental Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018).Google Scholar

Dworkin, R., ‘The Modes of Rules I’, in Taking Rights Seriously: New Impression with a Reply to Critics (London: Duckworth, 1977).Google Scholar

Eagleton, C., Responsibility of States in International Law (New York: New York University Press, 1928).Google Scholar

Fauchille, P., Traité de Droit International Public (Paris: Rousseau & C., 1922).Google Scholar

Fiandaca, G., Musco, E., Diritto Penale: Parte Generale (Bologna: Zanichelli Editore, 2014).Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, G., ‘The General Principles of International Law Considered from the Standpoint of the Rule of Law’ (1957) 92 Recueil des Course de l’Académie de Droit International de la Haye 7.Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, M., ‘International Responsibility and Liability’, in Bodansky, D., Brunnée, J., Hey, E. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, M., ‘Legitimacy of International Environmental Law’ (2017) 77 ZaöRV 339.Google Scholar

Focarelli, C., International Law as Social Construct: The Struggle for Global Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Forlati, S., ‘L’objet des différentes obligations primaires de diligence: prévention, cessation, répression … ?’, in Cassella, S. (ed.), Le standard de due diligence et la responsabilité internationale (Paris: Pedone, 2018).Google Scholar

Forlati, S., ‘The Legal Obligation to Prevent Genocide: Bosnia v. Serbia and Beyond’ (2011) 31 Polish Yearbook of International Law 189.Google Scholar

Gaja, G., ‘Do States Have a Duty to Ensure Compliance with Obligations Erga Omnes by Other States?’, in Ragazzi, M. (ed.), International Responsibility Today: Essays in Memory of Oscar Schachter (Leiden: Brill, 2005).Google Scholar

Gaja, G., ‘General Principles of Law’, in Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012).Google Scholar

Gaja, G., ‘Primary and Secondary Rules in the International Law on State Responsibility’ (2014) 97 Rivista di diritto internazionale 981.Google Scholar

Garcìa Mora, M. R., International Responsibility for Hostile Acts of Private Persons Against Foreign States (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 1962).Google Scholar

Gasbarri, L., ‘The European Union is not a State: International Responsibility for Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing Activities’ (2020) 7 Maritime Safety and Security Law Journal 54.Google Scholar

Gattini, A., ‘Breach of International Obligations’, in Nollkaemper, A., Plakokefalos, I. (eds.), Principles of Shared Responsibility: An Appraisal of the State of the Art (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Gattini, A., ‘Breach of the Obligation to Prevent and Reparation Thereof in the ICJ’s Genocide Judgement’ (2007) 18 European Journal of International Law 695.Google Scholar

Gattini, A., ‘Smoking/No Smoking: Some Remarks on the Current Place of Fault in the ILC Draft Articles on State Responsibility’ (1999) 10 European Journal of International Law 397.Google Scholar

Gentili, A., De Legationibus Libri Tres, Vol II, trans. J. Laing, The Classics of International Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1924).Google Scholar

Gianelli, A., ‘Il contributo della dottrina italiana al tema della responsabilitá internazionale degli Stati per fatto illecito: qualche osservazione’ (2016) 99 Rivista di diritto internazionale 1042.Google Scholar

Grans, L., ‘The Concept of Due Diligence and the Positive Obligations to Prevent Honour-Related Violence: Beyond Deterrence’ (2018) 22 The International Journal of Human Rights 733.Google Scholar

Griebel, J., Plücken, M., ‘New Developments Regarding the Rules of Attribution? The International Court Justice’s Decision in Bosnia v. Serbia’ (2008) 21 Leiden Journal of International Law 601.Google Scholar

Grotius, H., De Jure Belli Ac Pacis Libri Tres, trans. by Kelsey, The Classics of International Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1925).Google Scholar

Hackworth, H., ‘Responsibility of States for Damages Caused in Their Territory to the Person or Property of Foreigners’ (1930) 24 American Journal of International Law 500.Google Scholar

Hakimi, M., ‘State Bystander Responsibility’ (2010) 21 European Journal of International Law 341.Google Scholar

Hall, W. E., A Treatise on International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1924).Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A., Honoré, T., Causation in the Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1959).Google Scholar

Harvard Law School Project, ‘The Law of Responsibility of States for Damage Done in Their Territory to the Persons or Property of Foreigners’ (1929) American Journal of International Law 131.Google Scholar

Hathaway, O. A., Chertoff, E. et al., ‘Ensuring Responsibility: Common Article 1 and State Responsibility for Non-State Actors’ (2017) 95 Texas Law Review 539.Google Scholar

Hautefeuille, L. B., Des droits et des devoirs des nations neutres en temps de guerre maritime, Tome premier (Paris: Guillaumin et C, Libraires, 1858).Google Scholar

Heathcote, S., ‘State Omission and Due Diligence: Aspects of Fault, Damage, and Contribution to Injury in the Law of State Responsibility’, in Bannelier, K., Christakis, T., Heathcote, S. (eds.), The ICJ and the Evolution of International Law: The Enduring Impact of the Corfu Channel Case (London: Routledge, 2012).Google Scholar

Heieck, J., A Duty to Prevent Genocide: Due Diligence Obligations Among the P5 (Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018).Google Scholar

Hernandez, G. , ‘Interpretative Authority and the International Judiciary’, in Bianchi, A, Peat, D, Windsor, M (eds.), Interpretation in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Hershey, A. S., The Essentials of International Public Law (New York: The Macmillan Company, 1912).Google Scholar

Hessbruegge, J. A., ‘The Historical Doctrine of Attribution and Due Diligence in International Law’ (2004) 36 New York University Journal of International law and Politics 265.Google Scholar

Higgins, R., Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Hollis, D. H., ‘The Existential Function of Interpretation in International Law’, in Bianchi, A., Peat, D., Windsor, M. (eds.), Interpretation in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Horbach, N. L. J. T., ‘The Confusion about State Responsibility and International Liability’ (1991) 4 Leiden Journal of International Law 47.Google Scholar

Hull, D., ‘Taxonomy’, in Craig, E., Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy (London: Routledge, 1998).Google Scholar

Hyde, C., ‘Concerning Damages Arising from Neglect to Prosecute’ (1928) 22 American Journal of International Law 140.Google Scholar

ILA Study Group on Due Diligence in International Law, ‘Due Diligence in International Law: Second Report’ (Johannesburg, 2016).Google Scholar

Jackson, M., Complicity in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Jacob, D., Le contenu de la responsabilité de l’Etat négligent’, in Cassella, S. (ed.), Le standard de due diligence et la responsabilité internationale (Paris: Pedone, 2018).Google Scholar

Jinks, D., ‘State Responsibility for the Acts of Private Harm Groups’ (2003) 4 Chicago Journal of International Law 83.Google Scholar

Joel-Proux, V., ‘Babysitting Terrorists: Should States Be Strictly Liable for Failing to Prevent Transborder Attacks’ (2005) 23 Berkeley Journal of International Law 615.Google Scholar

Kamminga, M., ‘Due Diligence Mania: The Misguided Introduction of and Extraneous Concept into Human Rights Discourse’ (2011) Maastricht Faculty of Law Working Paper No. 07.Google Scholar

Kanehara, A., ‘Reassessment of the Acts of the State in the Law of State Responsibility’ (2019) 399 Recueil des Course de l’Académie de Droit International de la Haye 9.Google Scholar

Kelsen, H., Principles of Public International Law (New York: Rinehart & Company, 1952).Google Scholar

Kelsen, H., Pure Theory of Law (2nd ed., University of California Press, 1970).Google Scholar

Kerbrat, Y., ‘Le standard de due diligence, catalyseur d’obligations conventionnelles et coutumières pour les Etats’, in Cassella, S. (ed.), Le standard de due diligence et la responsabilité internationale (Paris: Pedone, 2018).Google Scholar

Kerbrat, Y., ‘Obligations procédurales et obligations de fond en droit international des dommages transfrontières’, in Prezas, I. (ed.), Substance and procédure en droit international public: dialectique et influences croisées (Paris: Pedone, 2019).Google Scholar

Klabbers, J., ‘Reflections on Role Responsibility: The Responsibility of International Organizations for Failing to Act’ (2017) 28 European Journal of International Law 1133.Google Scholar

Klabbers, J., ‘The Redundancy of Soft Law’ (1996) 65 Nordic Journal of International Law 167.Google Scholar

Klabbers, J., Peters, A., Ulfstein, G., The Constitutionalization of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Kleinlein, T., ‘The Procedural Approach of the European Court of Human Rights: Between Subsidiarity and Dynamic Evolution’ (2019) 68 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 91.Google Scholar

Koivurova, T., ‘Due Diligence’, in Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2010).Google Scholar

Koivurova, T., ‘What is the Principle of Due Diligence?’, in Petman, J., Klabbers, J. (eds.), Nordic Cosmopolitanism: Essays in International Law for Martti Koskenniemi (Leiden: Brill, 2003).Google Scholar

Kolb, R., ‘Reflections on Due Diligence Duties in Cyberspace’ (2015) 58 German Yearbook of International Law 114.Google Scholar

König, D., ‘The Elaboration of Due Diligence Obligations as a Mechanism to Ensure Compliance with International Legal Obligations by Private Actors’, in ITLOS (ed.), The Contribution of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea to the Rule of Law: 1996–2016 (Leiden: Brill, 2018).Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M., ‘International Law and Hegemony: A Reconfiguration’ (2004) 17 Cambridge Review of International Affairs 197.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M., ‘Peaceful Settlement of Environmental Disputes’ (1991) 60 Nordic Journal of International Law 73.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M., ’The Politics of International Law: 20 Years Later’ (2009) 20 European Journal of International Law 7.Google Scholar

Krieger, H., Nolte, G., ‘The International Rule of Law: Rise or Decline? Points of Departure’ (KFG Working Paper Series No 1 2016) 12.Google Scholar

Krieger, H., Peters, A., ‘Due Diligence and Structural Change in the International Legal Order’, in Krieger, H., Peters, A., Kreuzer, L. (eds.), Due Diligence in the International Legal Order (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020).Google Scholar

Krieger, H., Peters, A., ‘Due Diligence in the International Legal Order’, in Krieger, H., Peters, A., Kreuzer, L. (eds.), Due Diligence in the International Legal Order (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020)Google Scholar

Kulesza, J., Due Diligence in international Law (Leiden: Brill, 2016).Google Scholar

Lagrange, E., ‘La responsabilité des organisations internationales pour violation d’une obligation de diligence’, in Cassella, S. (ed.), Le standard de due diligence et la responsabilité internationale (Paris: Pedone, 2018).Google Scholar

Lanovoy, V., ‘The Use of Force by Non-State Actors and the Limits of Attribution of Conduct’ (2017) 28 European Journal of International Law 587.Google Scholar

Lanovoy, V., Complicity and Its Limits in the Law of International Responsibility (London: Hart Publishing, 2016).Google Scholar

Latty, F., ‘Actions and Omissions’, in Crawford, J., Pellet, A., Olleson, S. (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, H., ‘Revolutionary Activities by Private Persons Against Foreign States’ (1928) 22 American Journal of International Law 105.Google Scholar

Lavrysen, L., ‘Protection by the Law: The Positive Obligation to Develop a Legal Framework to Adequately Protect ECHR’, in Haeck, Y., Brems, E. (eds.), Human Rights and Civil Liberties in the 21st Century (Berlin: Springer, 2014).Google Scholar

Lavrysen, L., Human Rights in a Positive State: Rethinking the Relationship between Positive and Negative Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights (Cambridge: Intersentia, 2016).Google Scholar

Lawrence, W. B., ‘Opinion exprimé sur les Trois Règles de Washington’ (1974) 27 Revue de Droit International et de Législation Comparée 570.Google Scholar

Le Bonniec, N., La procéduralisation des droits substantiels par la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme: réflexion sur le côntrole juridictionnel du respect des droits garantis par la Convention européenne des droits de l’homme (Brussels: Bruylant, 2017).Google Scholar

Lemoine-Schonne, M., ‘Substance et procédure en droit international du climat’, in Prezas, I. (ed.), Substance and procédure en droit international public: dialectique et influences croisées (Paris: Pedone, 2019).Google Scholar

Lévy, D., ‘La responsabilité pour omission et la responsabilité pour risque en droit international public’ (1961) 65 Revue Générale de Droit International Public 744.Google Scholar

Linderfalk, U., ‘State Responsibility and the Primary-Secondary Rules Terminology: The Role of Language for an Understanding of the International Legal System’ (2009) 78 Nordic Journal of International Law 53.Google Scholar

Longobardo, M., ‘L’obbligo di prevenzione del genocidio e la distinzione fra obblighi di condotta e obblighi di risultato’ (2019) 2 Diritti Umani e Diritto Internazionale 237.Google Scholar

Longobardo, M., ‘The Relevance of the Concept of Due Diligence for International Humanitarian Law’ (2019) 37 Wisconsin International Law Journal 44.Google Scholar

Lowe, V., ‘Responsibility for the Conduct of other States’ (2002) 101 Japanese Journal of International Law and Diplomacy 1.Google Scholar

Luzzatto, R., ‘Responsabilitá e colpa in diritto internazionale’ (1968) 51 Rivista di diritto internazionale 53.Google Scholar

Maiorca, C., ‘Colpa (teoria generale)’, in Enciclopedia del diritto (Milan: Giuffré, 1960).Google Scholar

Mallory, C., Human Rights Imperialists: The Extraterritorial Application of the European Convention on Human Rights (London: Hart Publishing, 2020).Google Scholar

Mann, F. A., ‘The Doctrine of Jurisdiction in International Law’ (1964) 111 Recueil des Course de l’Académie de Droit International de la Haye 1.Google Scholar

Marchesi, A., ‘The Distinction Between Obligations of Conduct and Obligations of Result Following its Deletion from the Draft Articles on State Responsibility’, in Studi in onore di Gaetano Arangio-Ruiz (Naples: Editoriale Scientifica, 2004), vol. 2.Google Scholar

Marchesi, A., Obblighi di Condotta e obblighi di risultato: Contributo allo studio degli obblighi internazionali (Milan: Giuffré, 2005).Google Scholar

Mbengue, M. M., ‘The South China Sea Arbitration: Innovations in Marine Environmental Fact-Finding and Due Diligence Obligations’ (2016) 110 American Journal of International Law Unbound 285.Google Scholar

Mbengue, M. M., Essai sur une théorie du risqué en droit international public (Paris: Pedone, 2009).Google Scholar

McCormick, N., Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory (Oxford: Clarendon Press 1978).Google Scholar

McDonald, N., ‘The Role of Due Diligence in International Law’ (2019) 68 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 1041.Google Scholar

McDougal, M. S., ‘Law and Power’ (1952) 46 American Journal of International Law 102.Google Scholar

Mendelson, M., ‘The International Court of Justice and the Sources of International Law’, in Lowe, V., Fitzmaurice, M. (eds.), Fifty Years of the International Court of Justice: Essays in Honour of Sir Robert Jennings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Milano, E., ‘Occupation’, in Nollkaemper, A., Plakokefalos, I (eds.), The Practice of Shared Responsibility in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017), 733.Google Scholar

Milanović, M., Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Milanović, M., Papić, T., ‘The Applicability of the ECHR in Contested Territories’ (2018) 67 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 779.Google Scholar

Monaco, R., ‘La responsabilità internazionale dello Stato per fatti degli individui’ (1939) 18 Rivista di diritto internazionale 3.Google Scholar

Moore, J. B., History and Digest of the International Arbitrations to which the United States Has Been a Party (Washington: US Government Printing, 1943).Google Scholar

Moore, M. S., Causation and Responsibility: An Essay in Law, Morals and Metaphysics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Morelli, G., Nozioni di diritto internazionale (Padua: CEDAM, 1967).Google Scholar

Morriss, P., Power: A Philosophical Analysis (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1987).Google Scholar

Newcombe, A., Paradell, L., Law and Practice of Investment Treaties: Standards of Treatment (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2009).Google Scholar

Nielsen, F. K., American-Turkish Claims Settlement under the Agreement of December 24, 1923, and Supplemental Agreements Between the United States and Turkey, Opinions and Reports (Washington: US Government Printing Office, 1937).Google Scholar

Nollkaemper, A., ‘Power and Responsibility’, in di Stefano, A. (ed.), Un diritto senza terra? Funzioni e limiti del principio di territorialitá nel diritto internaizonale e dell’Unione Europea? A Lackland Law? Territory, Effectiveness and Jurisdiction in International and European Law (Turin: Giappichelli, 2014).Google Scholar

Nollkaemper, A., d’Aspremont, J., et al., ‘Guiding Principles on Shared Responsibility in International Law’ (2020) 31 European Journal of International Law 15.Google Scholar

Nollkaemper, A., Jacobs, D., ‘Shared Responsibility in International Law: A Conceptual Framework’ (2013) 34 Michigan Journal of International Law 359.Google Scholar

Okowa, P., ‘Procedural Obligations in International Environmental Agreements’ (1997) 67 British Yearbook of International Law 275.Google Scholar

Ollino, A., ‘A “Missed” Secondary Rule? Causation in the Breach of Preventive and Due Diligence Obligations’, in Kajtar, G., Çali, B., Milanovic, M. (eds.), Attribution, Causality and Evidentiary Rules: Secondary Rules of Primary Importance (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2021).Google Scholar

Oppenheim, L., International Law: A Treatise, Vol II War and Neutrality (London: Longmans, Green & Co, 1912).Google Scholar

Österdahl, I., ‘Due Diligence in International Anti-Terrorism Law: Developments in the Resolutions of the UN Security Council’, in Krieger, H., Peters, A., Kreuzer, L. (eds.), Due Diligence in the International Legal Order (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020).Google Scholar

Ouedraogo, A., ‘La due diligence en droit international: de la règle de la neutralité au principe général’ (2012) 42 Revue Général de Droit 641.Google Scholar

Ouedraogo, A., ‘La neutralité et l’emergence du concept de due diligence en droit international : l’affaire de l’Alabama revisité’ (2011) 13 Journal of the History of International Law 307.Google Scholar

Paddeu, F., Justification and Excuses in International Law: Concept and Theory of General Defences (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018).Google Scholar

Palchetti, P., ‘La violation par l’Union européenne d’une obligation de diligence’, in Cassella, S. (ed.), Le standard de due diligence et la responsabilité internationale (Paris: Pedone, 2018).Google Scholar

Palchetti, P., L’organo di fatto dello Stato nell’illecito internazionale (Milan: Giuffré, 2007).Google Scholar

Palchetti, P., ‘State Responsibility for Complicity in Genocide’, in Gaeta, P., The UN Genocide Convention (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Palchetti, P., ‘The Role of General Principles in Promoting the Development of Customary International Rules’, in Wouters, J., Andenas, M., Fitzmaurice, M., Tanzi, A. (eds.), General Principles and the Coherence of International Law (Leiden: Brill, 2019).Google Scholar

Palmisano, G., ‘Colpa dell’organo e colpa dello Stato nella responsabilitá internazionale: Spunti critici di teoria e di prassi’ (1992) 19 Comunicazioni e Studi 623.Google Scholar

Palmisano, G., ‘Fault’, in Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2007).Google Scholar

Papanicolopulu, I., ‘Due Diligence in the Law of the Sea’ in Krieger, H., Peters, A., Kreuzer, L. (eds.), Due Diligence in the International Legal Order (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020).Google Scholar

Paparinskis, M., The International Minimum Standard and Fair and Equitable Treatment (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, J., Wessel, R. A., Wouters, J., ‘When Structures Become Shackles: Stagnation and Dynamics in International Lawmaking’ (2014) 25 European Journal of International Law 733.Google Scholar

Peat, D., Comparative Reasoning in International Courts and Tribunals (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019).Google Scholar

Pellet, A., ‘Les Articles de la CDI sur la responsabilité de l’État pour faits internationalement illicite : suite – et fin?’ (2002) 48 Annuaire Français de Droit International 1.Google Scholar

Pellet, A., ‘Remarques sur une révolution inachevée, le projet d’articles de la Commission du Droit International sur la responsabilité des Etats’ (1996) Annuaire Français de Droit International 7.Google Scholar

Pellet, A., Müller, D., ‘Article 38’, in Zimmermann, A., Tams, C., Oeller-Frahn, K. (eds.), The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary (3rd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019).Google Scholar

Perassi, G., Introduzione alle scienze giuridiche (Cittá di Castello: Unione Arti Grafiche, 1938).Google Scholar

Perelman, C., ‘The Rational and the Reasonable’, in Perelman, C. (ed.), The New Rhetoric and the Humanities (Berlin: Springer, 1989).Google Scholar

Pineschi, L., ‘The Duty of Environmental Impact Assessment in the First ITLOS Chamber’s Advisory Opinion: Towards the Supremacy of the General Rule to Protect and Preserve the Marine Environment as a Common Value?’, in Boschiero, N., Scovazzi, T., Pitea, C., Ragni, C. (eds.), International Courts and the Development of International Law: Essays in Honour of Tullio Treves (The Hague: Asser Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Pisillo-Mazzeschi, R., Due diligence e responsabiitá internazionale degli stati (Milan: Giuffré, 1989).Google Scholar

Pisillo-Mazzeschi, R., ‘Le chemin étranger de la due diligence: d’un concept mystérieux à un concept surévalué’, in Cassella, S. (ed.), Le standard de due diligence et la responsabilité internationale (Paris: Pedone, 2018).Google Scholar

Pisillo-Mazzeschi, R., ‘Responsabilité de l’état pour violation des obligations positives relatives aux droits de l’homme’ (2008) 333 Recueil des Course de l’Académie de Droit International de la Haye 175.Google Scholar

Pisillo-Mazzeschi, R., ‘The Due Diligence Rule and the Nature of International Responsibility of States’ (1992) 35 German Yearbook of International Law 9.Google Scholar

Plakokefalos, I., ‘Causation in the Law of State Responsibility and the Problem of Overdetermination: In Search of Clarity’ (2015) 26 European Journal of International Law 471.Google Scholar

Plakokefalos, I., ‘Prevention Obligations in International Environmental Law’ (2012) 23 Yearbook of International Environmental Law 5.Google Scholar

Plakokefalos, I., ‘The Use of Force by Non-State Actors and the Limits of Attribution of Conduct: A Reply to Vladyslav Lanovoy’ (2017) 28 European Journal of International Law 587.Google Scholar

Pradier-Fodéré, P., Traité de Droit International Public Européen et Américain (Paris: Pedone, 1885–1906).Google Scholar

Puma, G., Complicitá di Stati nell’Illecito Internazionale (Turin: Giappichelli, 2018).Google Scholar

Quadri, R., Diritto internazionale pubblico (Naples: Liguori, 1968).Google Scholar

Radi, Y., La standardisation et le droit international: contours d’une théorie dialectique de la formation du droit (Paris: Bruylant, 2013).Google Scholar

Radi, Y., ‘Standardization: A Dynamic and Procedural Conceptualization of International Law-Making’ (2012) 25 Leiden Journal of International Law 283.Google Scholar

Ragazzi, M., The Concept of International Obligations Erga Omnes (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Raible, L., Human Rights Unbound: A Theory of Extraterritoriality (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020).Google Scholar

Rajput, A., ‘Due Diligence in International Investment Law’, in Krieger, H., Peters, A., Kreuzer, L. (eds.), Due Diligence in the International Legal Order (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020).Google Scholar

Rawl, J., ‘The Idea of Public Reason Revisited’ (1997) 64 The University of Chicago Law Review 765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Redgwell, C., ‘General Principles of International Law’, in Vogenauer, S., Weatherill, S. (eds.), General Principles of Law: European and Comparative Perspectives (London: Hart Publishing, 2017).Google Scholar

Reisman, W. M., ‘International Lawmaking: A Process of Communication’ (1981) 75 Proceedings of the Annual Meeting, American Society of International Law 101.Google Scholar

Reuter, P., ‘De l’obligation de negocier’ (1975) 14 Comunicazioni e Studi 711.Google Scholar

Reuter, P., ‘Principes de droit international public’ (1961) 103 Recueil des Course de l’Académie de Droit International de la Haye 431.Google Scholar

Roucounas, E., A Landscape of Contemporary Theories of International Law (Leiden: Brill, 2019).Google Scholar

Ryngaert, C., ‘State Responsibility and Non-State Actors’, in Noortmann, M, Reinisch, A, Ryngaert, C (eds.), Non-State Actors and International Law (London: Hart Publishing, 2015).Google Scholar

Salerno, F., ‘Genesi e usi della nozione di organo nella dottrina internazionalistica italiana’ (2009) 92 Rivista di diritto internazionale 921.Google Scholar

Salmon, J., ‘Le Concept de raisonnable en droit international public’, in Le droit international, unite et diversité: mélanges offerts à Paul Reuter (Paris: Pedone, 1981).Google Scholar

Salmon, J., ‘Le fait étatique complexe: un notion contestable’ (1982) 28 Annuaire Français de Droit International 709.Google Scholar

Salmon, J., ‘Les notions à contenu variable en droit international public’, in Perelman, C., Vander Elst, R. (eds.), Les notions à contenu variable en droit (Paris: Bruylant, 1984).Google Scholar

Schachter, O., International Law in Theory and Practice (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1991).Google Scholar

Schachter, O., ‘Toward a Theory of International Obligation’ (1968) 8 Virginia Journal of International Law 300.Google Scholar

Scheinin, M., ‘Just Another World? Jurisdiction in the Roadmaps of State Responsibility and Human Rights’, in Langford, M., Vandenhole, W., Scheinin, M. (eds.), Global Justice, State Duties: The Extraterritorial Scope of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Schmitt, M., ‘In Defence of Due Diligence in Cyberspace’, (2015) 125 The Yale Law Journal Forum 68.Google Scholar

Schmitt, M., ‘Sovereignty in Cyberspace: Lex Lata Vel Non’ (2017) 111 American Journal of International Law Unbound 213.Google Scholar

Schmitt, M. (ed.), Tallinn Manual 2.0 on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Operations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Seibert-Fohr, A., ‘From Complicity to Due Diligence: When Do States Incur Responsibility for Their Involvement in Serious International Wrongdoing?’ (2017) 60 German Yearbook of International Law 667.Google Scholar

Seminara, L., ‘Risk Regulation and the European Convention on Human Rights’ (2016) 4 European Journal of Risk Regulation 733.Google Scholar

Seršić, M., ‘Due Diligence: Fault-Based Responsibility of Autonomous Standard?’, in Wolfrum, R., Seršić, M., Šošić, T. (eds.), Contemporary Developments in International Law: Essays in Honour of Budislav Vukas (Leiden: Brill, 2015).Google Scholar

Shany, Y., The Extraterritorial Application of International Human Rights Law (2020) 409 Recueil des Course de l’Académie de Droit International de la Haye 9.Google Scholar

Shelton, D., Gould, A., ‘Positive and Negative Obligations’, in Shelton, D. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook on International Human Rights Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Shibatam, A., ‘The Court’s Decision In Silentium on the Sources of International Law’, in Bannelier, K., Christakis, T., Heathcote, S. (eds.), The ICJ and the Evolution of International Law: The Enduring Impact of the Corfu Channel Case (London: Routledge, 2012).Google Scholar

Shue, H., Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence, and US Foreign Policy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980).Google Scholar

Sicilianos, L., ‘The Classification of Obligations and the Multilateral Dimension of the Relations of International Responsibility’ (2002) 13 EJIL 1127.Google Scholar

Sperduti, G., Contributo alla teoria delle situazioni giuridiche soggettive (Milan: Giuffré, 1944).Google Scholar

Sperduti, G., ‘Sulla colpa in diritto internazionale’ (1950) 3 Comunicazioni e Studi 93.Google Scholar

Starita, M., ‘Négligence illicite et responsabilité multiples: partage ou cumul de responsabilités?’, in Cassella, S. (ed.), Le standard de due diligence et la responsabilité internationale (Paris: Pedone, 2018).Google Scholar

Stern, B., ‘The Elements of An Internationally Wrongful Act’, in Crawford, J., Pellet, A., Olleson, S., Parlet, K. (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Stern, B., ‘The Obligation to Make Reparation’, in Crawford, J., Pellet, A., Olleson, S., Parlet, K. (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Stoyanova, V., ‘Causation between State Omission and Harm within the Framework of Positive Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights’ (2018) 18 Human Rights Law Review 309.Google Scholar

Stoyanova, V., ‘Due Diligence versus Positive Obligations: Critical Reflections on the Council of Europe Convention on Violence Against Women’, in Niemi, J., Peroni, L., Stoyanova, V. (eds.), International Law and Violence Against Women (London: Routledge, 2020).Google Scholar

Stoyanova, V., ‘Fault, Knowledge and Risk Within the Framework of Positive Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights’ (2020) Leiden Journal of International Law 1.Google Scholar

Talbot Jensen, E., ‘Cyber Sovereignty: The Way Ahead’ (2015) 50 Texas International Law Review 275.Google Scholar

Talmon, S., ‘Determining Customary International Law: The ICJ’s Methodology between Induction, Deduction and Assertion’ (2015) 26 European Journal of International Law 417.Google Scholar

Tams, C., Enforcing Obligations Erga Omnes in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Tancredi, A., ‘Doctrinal Alternatives to Self-Defence Against Non-State Actors’ (2017) 77 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 69.Google Scholar

Tancredi, A., ‘Il problema della legittima difesa nei confronti di milizie non statali alla luce dell’ultima crisi tra Israele e Libano’ (2007) 90 Rivista di diritto internazionale 969.Google Scholar

Tanzi, A., ‘Liability for Lawful Acts’, in Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013).Google Scholar

Tanzi, A., Kolliopoulos, A., ‘The No-Harm Rule’, in Tanzi, A., McIntyre, O., Kolliopoulos, A., Rieu-Clarke, A., Kinna, R. (eds.), The UNECE Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes: Its Contribution to International Water Cooperation (Leiden: Brill, 2015).Google Scholar

Thirlway, H., The Sources of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Tomuschat, C., ‘Obligations Arising for States without or against Their Will’ (1993) 241 Recueil des Course de l’Académie de Droit International de la Haye 209.Google Scholar

Tomuschat, C., ‘What Is a “Breach” of the European Convention on Human Rights?’, in Lawson, R., de Blois, M. (eds.), The Dynamics of the Protection of Human Rights in Europe: Essays in Honour of Henry G. Schermers (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1994).Google Scholar

Tonkin, H., State Control over Private Military and Security Companies in Armed Conflict (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Townley, S., ‘The Rise of Risk in International Law’ (2016) 18 Chicago Journal of International Law 594.Google Scholar

Trapp, K., State Responsibility for International Terrorism: Problems and Prospects (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Treves, T., ‘“Due Regard” Obligations under the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea: The Laying of Cables and Activities in the Area’ (2019) 34 International Journal of Marine Coastal Law 167.Google Scholar

Treves, T., ‘Environmental Impact Assessment and the Precautionary Approach: Why Are International Courts and Tribunal Reluctant to Consider Them as General Principles of Law?’, in Andenas, M., Fitzmaurice, M., Tanzi, A., Wouters, J. (eds.), General Principles and the Coherence of International Law (Leiden: Brill, 2019).Google Scholar

Triepel, E., Völkerrecht und landesrecht, trans. by R. Brunet, Droit international et droit interne (first published 1899, Oxford: Pedone, 1920).Google Scholar

Tsagourias, N., ‘Cyber Attacks, Self-Defence and the Problem of Attribution’ (2012) 17 Journal of Conflict and Security Law 229.Google Scholar

Tsagourias, N., ‘State Obligations in Cyber Operations’ (2015) 14 Baltic Yearbook of International Law 71.Google Scholar

Tzevelekos, V. P., ‘Reconstructing the Effective Control Criterion in Extraterritorial Human Rights Breaches: Direct Attribution of Wrongfulness, Due Diligence and Concurrent Responsibility’ (2014) 36 Michigan Journal of International Law 129.Google Scholar

Valentine, S, Sprague, R., ‘Due Diligence’, in Encyclopedia Britannica, www.britannica.com/topic/due-diligence.Google Scholar

Vattel, E., The Law of Nations, Or, Principles of the Law of Nature, Applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns, Book II, ed. by Kapossy, B., Whatmore, R. (first published 1758, Carmel: Liberty Fund, 2008).Google Scholar

Venzke, I., How Interpretation Makes International Law: On Semantic Change and Normative Twists (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Violi, F., ‘The Function of the Triad “Territory”, “Jurisdiction” and “Control” in Due Diligence Obligations’, in Krieger, H., Peters, A., Kreuzer, L. (eds.), Due Diligence in the International Legal Order (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020).Google Scholar

von Bogdandy, A., Venzke, I., ‘Beyond Dispute: International Judicial Institutions as Lawmakers’ (2011) 12 German Law Journal 979.Google Scholar

Vordermayer, M., ‘The Extraterritorial Application of Multilateral Environmental Agreements’ (2018) 59 Harvard International Law Journal 59.Google Scholar

Weinryb, E., ‘Omissions and Responsibility’ (1980) 30 The Philosophical Quarterly 1.Google Scholar

Westlake, J., International Law, Part II, War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1913).Google Scholar

White, N., ‘Due Diligence, the UN, and Peacekeeping’, in Krieger, H., Peters, A., Kreuzer, L. (eds.), Due Diligence in the International Legal Order (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020).Google Scholar

Wilde, R., ‘Compliance with Human Rights Norms Extraterritoriality: Human Rights Imperialism?’, in Boisson, L. de Chazournes, M. Kohen, (eds.), International Law and the Quest for Its Implementation: Liber Amicorum Vera Gowlland-Debbas (Leiden: Brill, 2010).Google Scholar

Wolfrum, R., ‘General International Law (Principles, Rules, and Standards)’, in Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2010).Google Scholar

Wolfrum, R., ‘International Law of Cooperation’, in Bernhardt, R. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1995).Google Scholar

Wolfrum, R., ‘Obligations of Result Versus Obligation of Conduct: Some Thoughts About the Implementation of International Obligations’, in Arsanjani, M. H., Cogan, J., Sloane, R., Wiessner, S. (eds.), Looking into the Future: Essays on International Law in Honor of W. Michael Reisman (Leiden: Brill, 2010).Google Scholar

Wouters, J., ‘International Law, Informal Law-Making, Global Governance in Times of Anti-Globalism and Populism’, in Krieger, H., Nolte, G., Zimmermann, A. (eds.), International Rule of Law: Rise of Decline? (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019).Google Scholar

Xenos, D., The Positive Obligations of the State under the European Convention on Human Rights (London: Routledge, 2012).Google Scholar

Zannas, P. A., La responsabilité internationale des Etats pour les actes de négligence (Montreaux: Ganguin & Laubscher, 1952).Google Scholar

Zarbiyev, F., ‘Judicial Activism in International Law: A Conceptual Framework for Analysis’ (2012) 3 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 247.Google Scholar