In this chapter I take up some of the positions and issues not elaborated in chapter 2, especially the assumption that koinéization played a role in the development of White American English vernaculars (WAEV). I maintain that they are contact-based and developed by the same restructuring processes which produced the vernaculars called creoles. The myth that WAEVs have been inherited almost intact from England, whereas African-American English (AAE) varieties represent their corruption by contact with African languages cannot remain unchallenged. The fact that no single WAEV is a match of any British English vernacular, although many of their features can individually be matched across both sides of the Atlantic, deserves an explanation. Part of the explanation lies in the competition-and-selection process submitted in chapters 1 and 2. Contact of dialects and of languages was as much a factor in the development of WAEVs as of AAE.

Introduction

This chapter is largely programmatic. I primarily intend to be provocative and invite readers to re-examine several poorly justified assumptions about the status and origin of American English varieties. I do not provide (conclusive) answers to several questions I raise, although I suggest new research avenues. The term American English is pluralized in the title, on the model of the more common term new Englishes, simply to emphasize diversity over the typically suggested uniformity in the anglophone linguistic universe of the USA. Thus I expect to be consistent with research in American dialectology.