Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T18:42:16.657Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Poverty, Malnutrition, and Income Inequality

from Part Two. - Poverty Alleviation and Income Distribution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

E. Wayne Nafziger
Affiliation:
Kansas State University
Get access

Summary

How can we provide a good quality of life and productive work for the seven hundred million to one billion people (10 to 14 percent) of the world's seven billion people who are poor or living on no more than $1 (or $1.25) a day? Economic growth is the most important factor contributing to poverty reduction. Figure 6-1 shows that, for ninety-nine developed countries (DCs) and less developed countries (LDCs), the growth rates of national income per capita for 1950 to 1999 are closely correlated with the growth of income per capita of the poorest 20 percent. The country you live in, more than any other fact, determines your position within the world's economic class system. Branko Milanovic (2002b:78) indicates that 88 percent of total world inequality in 1993 results from between-country inequality, 2 percent from within-country inequality, and 10 percent from an overlap between intercountry and intracountry inequality. Still, whereas the ratio of between-country to within-income inequality increased globally from 1820 to 1960, from 1960 to the present, this ratio has fallen back slightly to its level in the 1940s (Firebaugh 2003:23–30).

Information Sparsity

Gary Fields (1994:87) finds it regrettable that standard studies of country development provide great detail about macroeconomic conditions and the balance of payments without providing “information on who has benefited how much from economic growth and…who has been hurt how much by economic decline.” Estimates of income distribution in most developing countries are, at best, approximations of the underlying distribution we wish to measure. Despite efforts since the early 1970s to investigate income inequality, these data are weaker than national income statistics.

Type
Chapter
Information
Economic Development , pp. 161 - 212
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×