Abric, J.-C. (1984). A theoretical and experimental approach to the study of social representations in a situation of interaction. In Moscovici, S. and Farr, R. (eds.), Social representations (pp. 223–50). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Adams, C. (1993). For good and evil: The impact of taxes on the course of civilization. Lanham, MD: Madison Books.Google Scholar

Adams, C., and Webley, P. (2001). Small business owners' attitudes on VAT compliance in the UK. Journal of Economic Psychology, 22(2), 195–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.), Advances in experimental and social psychology (vol. II, pp. 267–99). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Agnell, J., and Persson, M. (2000). Tax arbitrage and labor supply. Journal of Public Economics, 78(1–2), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ahmed, E. (2004). Validation of the ‘Management of Shame State – Shame Acknowledgment and Shame Displacement’ (MOSS-SASD) in the context of taxation. Unpublished manuscript. The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.

Ahmed, E., and Braithwaite, V. (2004). When tax collectors become collectors for child support and student loans: Jeopardizing the revenue base? Kyklos, 57(3), 303–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ahmed, E., and Braithwaite, V.(2005). Understanding small business taxpayers: Issues of deterrence, tax morale, fairness and work practice. International Small Business Journal, 23(5), 539–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ajzen, I.(1993). Attitude theory and the attitude–behavior relation. In Krebs, D. and Schmidt, P. (eds.), New directions in attitude measurement (pp. 41–57). New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Alexander, C., and Feinstein, J. S. (1987). A microeconomic analysis of income tax evasion (Mimeo). Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Institute of Technology.Google Scholar

Allingham, M., and Sandmo, A. (1972). Income tax evasion: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 1(3–4), 323–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alm, J. (1991). A perspective on the experimental analysis of taxpayer reporting. The Accounting Review, 55(3), 577–93.Google Scholar

Alm, J., Cronshaw, M. B., and McKee, M. (1993). Tax compliance with endogenous audit selection-rules. Kyklos, 46(1), 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alm, J., Jackson, B. R., and McKee, M. (1990). Alternative government approaches for increasing tax compliance (Mimeo). Boulder: University of Colorado, Department of Economics.Google Scholar

Alm, J., Jackson, B. R., and McKee, M.(1992a). Institutional uncertainty and taxpayer compliance. The American Economic Review, 82(4), 1,018–26.Google Scholar

Alm, J., Jackson, B. R., and McKee, M.(1992b). Estimating the determinants of taxpayer compliance with experimental data. National Tax Journal, 45(1), 107–14.Google Scholar

Alm, J., Jackson, B. R., and McKee, M.(1993). Fiscal exchange, collective decision institutions, and tax compliance. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 22(3), 285–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alm, J., Jackson, B. R., and McKee, M.(2005). Audit information dissemination, taxpayer communication, and compliance behavior. Retrieved 31 December 2005, from http://aysps.gsu.edu/people/working/AlmJacksonMcKee-DirectversusIndirectEffects-05.18.05.DOC.

Alm, J., Martinez-Vazquez, J., and Schneider, F. (2004). ‘Sizing’ the problem of the hard-to tax. In Alm, J., Martinez-Vazquez, J. and Wallace, S. (eds.), Taxing the hard-to-tax: Lessons from theory and practice (pp. 11–75). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Alm, J., McClelland, G. H., and Schulze, W. D. (1992). Why do people pay taxes? Journal of Public Economics, 48(1), 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alm, J., McClelland, G. H., and Schulze, W. D.(1999). Changing the social norm of tax compliance by voting. Kyklos, 52(2), 141–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alm, J., McKee, M., and Beck, W. (1990). Amazing grace – tax amnesties and compliance. National Tax Journal, 43(1), 23–37.Google Scholar

Alm, J., Sanchez, I., and deJuan, A. (1995). Economic and noneconomic factors in tax compliance. Kyklos, 48(1), 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alm, J., and Torgler, B. (2006). Culture differences and tax morale in the United States and in Europe. Journal of Economic Psychology, 27(2), 224–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderhub, V., Giese, S., Güth, W., Hoffmann, A., and Otto, T. (2001). Tax evasion with earned income: An experimental study. Finanz Archiv, 58(2), 188–206.Google Scholar

Andreoni, J. (1991). The desirability of a permanent tax amnesty. Journal of Public Economics, 45(2), 143–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andreoni, J., Erard, B., and Feinstein, J. S. (1998). Tax compliance. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(2), 818–60.Google Scholar

Andrews, M. (2003). New public management and democratic participation: Complementary or competing reforms? A South African study. International Journal of Public Administration, 26(8–9), 991–1,016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Angermeier, W. F., Bednorz, P., and Hursh, S. R. (1994). Operantes Lernen. Methoden, Ergebnisse, Anwendung. Munich: Ernst Reinhardt.Google Scholar

Antonides, G., and Robben, H. S. J. (1995). True positives and false alarms in the detection of tax evasion. Journal of Economic Psychology, 16(4), 617–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Argyle, M. (1987). The psychology of happiness. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Arkes, H. R., and Blumer, C. (1985). The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35(1), 124–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arkes, H. R., Joner, C. A., Pezzo, M. V., Nash, J. G., Siegel-Jacobs, K. and Stone, E. (1994). The psychology of windfall gains. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 59(3), 331–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arrow, K. (1974). The limits of organization. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Ayres, I., and Braithwaite, J. (1992). Responsive regulation: Transcending the deregulation debate. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Baldry, J. C. (1987). Income tax evasion and the tax schedule: Some experimental results. Public Finance, 42(3), 357–83.Google Scholar

Baldry, J. C.(1994). Economic analysis and taxpayer compliance: Time for a new agenda. Australian Tax Forum, 11(1), 45–62.Google Scholar

Balestrino, A., and Galmarini, U. (2003). Imperfect tax compliance and the optimal provision of public goods. Bulletin of Economic Research, 55(1), 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barber, B. M., and Odean, T. (2004). Are individual investors tax savvy? Evidence from retail and discount brokerage accounts. Journal of Public Economics, 88(1–2), 419–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baron, J. (2000). Thinking and deciding (3rd edn). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bartelsman, E. J., and Beetsma, R. M. W. J. (2003). Why pay more? Corporate tax avoidance through transfer pricing in OECD countries. Journal of Public Economics, 87(9–10), 2,225–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beck, P. J., Davis, J. S., and Jung, W.-O. (1991). Experimental evidence on taxpayer reporting under uncertainty. Accounting Review, 66(3), 535–58.Google Scholar

Becker, G. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. The Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), 169–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benford, F. (1938). The law of anomalous numbers. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 78(4), 551–72.Google Scholar

Bergman, M. S. (2002). Who pays for social policy? A study on taxes and trust. Journal of Social Policy, 31(2), 289–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bergman, M., and Nevarez, A. (2005). The social mechanisms of tax evasion and tax compliance. Politica y Gobierno, 12(1), 9.Google Scholar

Bernasconi, M. (1998). Tax evasion and orders of risk aversion. Journal of Public Economics, 67(1), 123–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berti, C., and Kirchler, E. (2001). Contributi e contribuenti: Una ricerca sulle rappresentazioni del sistema fiscale. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 28(3), 595–607.Google Scholar

Besim, M., and Jenkins, G. P. (2005). Tax compliance: When do employees behave like the self-employed? Applied Economics, 37(10), 1,201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bitterman, M. (1975). The comparative analysis of learning. Science, 188(4,189), 699–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blackwell, C. (2002). A meta-analysis of tax compliance experiments. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Public Choice Society and Economic Science Association, San Diego, CA.

Blamey, R., and Braithwaite, V. (1997). The validity of the security-harmony social values model in the general population. Australian Journal of Psychology, 49(1), 71–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Blickle, G., Schlegel, A., Fassbender, P., and Klein, U. (2006). Some personality correlates of business white-collar crime. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 55(2), 220–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blumenthal, M., and Christian, C. (2004). Tax preparers. In Aaron, H. J. and Slemrod, J. (eds.), The crisis in tax administration (pp. 201–29). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar

Bobek, D. D., and Hatfield, R. C. (2003). An investigation of the theory of planned behavior and the role of moral obligation in tax compliance. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 15(1), 13–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bogardus, E. S. (1928). Immigration and race attitudes. Boston, MA: D. C. Heath and Company.Google Scholar

Bongiovanni, A. (1977). A review of research on the effects of punishment in the schools. Paper presented at the Conference on Child Abuse, Children's Hospital National Medical Center, Washington, DC.

Bosco, L., and Mittone, L. (1997). Tax evasion and moral constraints: Some experimental evidence. Kyklos, 50(3), 297–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bracewell-Milnes, B. (1979). Tax avoidance and evasion: The individual and society. London: Panopticum Press.Google Scholar

Braithwaite, J. (2003). Large business and the compliance model. In Braithwaite, V. (ed.), Taxing democracy. Understanding tax avoidance and evasion (pp. 177–202). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Braithwaite, J.(2005). Markets in vice. Markets in virtue. Leichhardt: The Federation Press.Google Scholar

Braithwaite, V. (1994). Beyond Rokeach's equality–freedom model: Two-dimensional values in a one-dimensional world. Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 67–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braithwaite, V.(1998). The value balance model of political evaluations. British Journal of Psychology, 89(2), 223–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braithwaite, V.(2003a). Dancing with tax authorities: Motivational postures and non-compliant actions. In Braithwaite, V. (ed.), Taxing democracy. Understanding tax avoidance and tax evasion (pp. 15–39). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Braithwaite, V.(2003b). A new approach to tax compliance. In Braithwaite, V. (ed.), Taxing democracy. Understanding tax avoidance and tax evasion (pp. 1–11). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Braithwaite, V.(2003c). Perceptions of who's not paying their fair share. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 38(3), 335–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braithwaite, V.(ed.). (2003d). Taxing democracy. Understanding tax avoidance and tax evasion. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Braithwaite, V., and Ahmed, E. (2005). A threat to tax morale: The case of Australian higher education policy. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26(4), 523–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braithwaite, V., Braithwaite, J., Gibson, D., and Makkai, T. (1994). Regulatory styles, motivational postures and nursing home compliance. Law and Policy, 16(4), 363–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braithwaite, V. and Job, J. (2003). The theoretical base for the ATO compliance model. Technical Report Research Note 5, CTSI, RSSS, ANU. Retrieved 12 July 2006, from http://ctsi.anu.edu.au/publications/research%20notes/RN5.pdf.

Braithwaite, V., Schneider, F., Reinhart, M., and Murphy, K. (2003). Charting the shoals of the cash economy. In Braithwaite, V. (ed.), Taxing democracy. Understanding tax avoidance and tax evasion (pp. 93–108). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Braithwaite, V., and Wenzel, M. (2007). Integrating explanations of tax evasion and avoidance. In Lewis, A. (ed.), Cambridge handbook of psychology and economic behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brandstätter, H. (1994). Determinanten der Steuerhinterziehung: Ergebnisse der experimentellen Psychologie. In Smekal, C. and Theurl, E. (eds.), Stand und Entwicklung der Finanzpsychologie (pp. 213–45). Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar

Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Brooks, N., and Doob, A. N. (1990). Tax evasion: Searching for a theory of compliant behavior. In Friedland, M. L. (ed.), Securing compliance: Seven case studies. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brosio, G., Cassone, A., and Ricciuti, R. (2002). Tax evasion across Italy: Rational noncompliance or inadequate civic concern? Public Choice, 112(3–4), 259–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, D. (1985). Business ethics: Is small better? Policy Studies Journal, 13(4), 766–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burton, H. A., Karlinsky, S. S. and Blanthorne, C. (2005). Perceptions of a white-collar crime: Tax evasion. American Taxation Association's Journal of Legal Tax Research, 3(1), 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caballe, J., and Panades, J. (2005). Cost uncertainty and taxpayer compliance. International Tax and Public Finance, 12(3), 239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calderwood, G., and Webley, P. (1992). Who responds to changes in taxation? The relationship between taxation and incentive to work. Journal of Economic Psychology, 13(4), 735–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carnes, G. A., and Cuccia, A. D. (1996). An analysis of the effect of tax complexity and its perceived justification on equity judgments. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 18(2), 40–56.Google Scholar

Carroll, J. S. (1987). Compliance with the law: A decision-making approach to taxpaying. Law and Human Behavior, 11(4), 319–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carroll, J. S.(1992). How taxpayers think about their taxes: Frames and values. In Slemrod, J. (ed.), Why people pay taxes: Tax compliance and enforcement (pp. 43–63). Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan University Press.Google Scholar

Carslaw, C. A. P. N. (1988). Anomolies in income numbers: Evidence of goal oriented behavior. The Accounting Review, 63(2), 321–7.Google Scholar

Casey, J. T., and Scholz, J. T. (1991). Beyond deterrence: Behavioral decision theory and tax compliance. Law and Society Review, 25(4), 821–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chan, C. W., Troutman, C. S., and O'Bryan, D. (2000). An expanded model of taxpayer compliance: Empirical evidence from the United States and Hong Kong. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 9(2), 83–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chang, O. H., Nichols, D. R., and Schultz, J. J. (1987). Taxpayer attitudes toward tax audit risk. Journal of Economic Psychology, 8(3), 299–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chang, O. H., and Schultz, J. J. (1990). The income tax withholding phenomenon: Evidence from TCMP data. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 12(1), 88–93.Google Scholar

Christensen, K., Cline, R., and Neubig, T. (2001). Total corporate taxation: ‘Hidden,’ above-the-line, non-income taxes. National Tax Journal, 54(3), 495–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christian, C. W. (1994). Voluntary compliance with the individual income tax: Results from the 1988 TCMP study. Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Christie, R., and Geis, F. L. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Christopoulos, D. K. (2003). Does underground economy respond symmetrically to tax changes? Evidence from Greece. Economic Modelling, 20(3), 563–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chu, C. Y. (1990). Plea bargaining with the IRS. Journal of Public Economics, 41(3), 319–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cialdini, R. B. (1993). Influence. Science and practice. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar

Cialdini, R. B.(1996). Social influence and the triple tumor structure of organizational dishonesty. In Messick, D. M. and Tenbrunsel, A. E. (eds.), Codes of conduct (pp. 44–58). New York: Sage.Google Scholar

Clotfelter, C. (1983). Tax evasion and tax rates: An analysis of individual returns. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 65(3), 363–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collins, C. J., Hanges, P. J., and Locke, E. A. (2004). The relationship of achievement motivation to entrepreneurial behavior: A meta-analysis. Human Performance, 17(1), 95–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collins, J. H., Milliron, V. C., and Toy, D. R. (1990). Factors associated with household demand for tax preparers. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 12(1), 9–25.Google Scholar

Collins, J. H., Murphey, D., and Plumlee, R. D. (1990). The taxpayer's dilemma: How hard to work and what to report? University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.Google Scholar

Collins, J. H., and Plumlee, R. D. (1991). The taxpayer's labor and reporting decision: The effect of audit schemes. Accounting Review, 66(3), 559–76.Google Scholar

Copeland, P. V., and Cuccia, A. D. (2002). Multiple determinants of framing referents in tax reporting and compliance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88(1), 499–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corman, J., Lussier, R. N., and Nolan, K. G. (1996). Factors that encourage entrepreneural start-ups and existing firm expansion: A longitudinal study comparing recession and expansion periods. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(2), 43–55.Google Scholar

Costa, P. T., and McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar

Courakis, N. (2001). Financial crime today: Greece as a European case study. European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research, 9(2), 197–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cowell, F. A. (1992). Tax evasion and inequity. Journal of Economic Psychology, 13(4), 521–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, D., and Plumley, A. (1988). Analyses of voluntary compliance rates for different income source classes. Washington, DC: International Revenue Service, Research Division.Google Scholar

Cross, R. B., and Shaw, G. K. (1982). The evasion–avoidance choice: A suggested approach. National Tax Journal, 34(4), 489–91.Google Scholar

Crush, J. (1985). Colonial coercion and the Swazi tax revolt of 1903–1907. Political Geography Quarterly, 4(3), 179–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cuccia, A. D., and Carnes, G. A. (2001). A closer look at the relation between tax complexity and tax equity perceptions. Journal of Economic Psychology, 22(2), 113–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cullis, J., Jones, P., and Lewis, A. (2006). Tax framing, instrumentality and individual differences: Are there two different cultures? Journal of Economic Psychology, 27(2), 304–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cullis, J., and Lewis, A. (1997). Why people pay taxes: From a conventional economic model to a model of social convention. Journal of Economic Psychology, 18(2–3), 305–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cunningham, J. B., and Lischeron, J. (1991). Defining entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Management, 29(1), 45–61.Google Scholar

Dalton, T. (1994). The new IRS approach to nonfilers and nonpayers. The CPA Journal Online, 64 (December), 68–9.Google Scholar

Das-Gupta, A., Lahiri, R., and Mookherjee, D. (1995). Income tax compliance in India: An empirical analysis. World Development, 23(12), 2,051–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davis, D. D., and Holt, C. A. (1993). Experimental economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Dawes, R. M. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31(1), 169–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Juan, A., Lasheras, M. A., and Mayo, R. (1994). Voluntary tax compliant behavior of Spanish income tax payers. Public Finance, 49(4), 90–105.Google Scholar

de Rosa, A. S. (1996). Controversial social representations ‘of’ and ‘around’ advertising: How to sell pullovers by provoking discussion on social issues. Paper presented at the 11th General Meeting of EAESP, Gmunden, Austria.

Dean, P., Keenan, T., and Kenney, F. (1980). Taxpayers' attitudes to income tax evasion: An empirical study. British Tax Review, 25(1), 28–44.Google Scholar

DeCarlo, J. F., and Lyons, P. R. (1979). A comparison of selected personal characteristics of minority and non-minority female entrepreneurs. Journal of Small Business Management, 17(4), 22–9.Google Scholar

Die Presse (2006). 1,31 Mrd. Euro an Steuerbetrug aufgedeckt. (4 August 2006, page 15).

Dornstein, M. (1976). Compliance with legal and bureaucratic rules: The case of self-employed taxpayers in Israel. Human Relations, 29(11), 1,019–34.Google Scholar

Dornstein, M.(1987). Taxes: Attitudes and perceptions and their social bases. Journal of Economic Psychology, 8(1), 55–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duncan, W. A., LaRue, D. W., and Reckers, P. M. J. (1989). An empirical examination of the influences of selected economic and noneconomic variables in decision making by tax professionals. Advances in Taxation, 2(1), 91–106.Google Scholar

Durham, A. M. (1988). Crime seriousness and punitive severity: An assessment of social attitudes. Justice Quarterly, 5(1), 131–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Durkheim, E. (1976 [1898]). Individuelle und kollektive Vorstellungen. In Durkheim, E. (ed.), Soziologie und Philosophie (pp. 45–83). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Eagly, A. H., and Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar

Edlund, J. (2003). Attitudes towards taxation: Ignorant and incoherent? Scandinavian Political Studies, 26(2), 145–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eichenberger, R., and Frey, B. S. (2002). Democratic governance for a globalized world. Kyklos, 55(2), 265–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

el Sehity, T., Hölzl, E., and Kirchler, E. (2005). Price developments after a nominal shock: Benford's Law and psychological-pricing after the euro introduction. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 22(4), 471–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

el Sehity, T., Kirchler, E., and Muehlbacher, S. (2003). Rise and decline of social objects: Ten case studies on the social development of meaning. Paper presented at the IAREP-workshop ‘Euro: Currency and symbol’, Vienna, Austria.

Elffers, H. (1999). Tax evasion. In Earl, P. E. and Kemp, S. (eds.), The Elgar companion to consumer research and economic psychology (pp. 556–60). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Elffers, H.(2000). But taxpayers do cooperate! In Vugt, M. V., Snyder, M., Tyler, T. R. and Biel, A. (eds.), Cooperation in modern society. Promoting the welfare of communities, states and organizations (pp. 184–194). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Elffers, H., and Hessing, D. J. (1997). Influencing the prospects of tax evasion. Journal of Economic Psychology, 18(2–3), 289–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elffers, H., Robben, H. S. J., and Hessing, D. J. (1991). Under-reporting income: Who is the best judge – taxpayer or tax inspector? Journal of Royal Statistical Society, 154(1), 125–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elffers, H., Robben, H. S. J., and Hessing, D. J.(1992). On measuring tax evasion. Journal of Economic Psychology, 13(4), 545–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elffers, H., Weigel, R. H., and Hessing, D. J. (1987). The consequences of different strategies for measuring tax evasion behaviour. Journal of Economic Psychology, 8(3), 311–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erard, B. (1997). Self-selection with measurement errors: A microeconometric analysis of the decision to seek tax assistance and its implications for tax compliance. Journal of Econometrics, 81(2), 319–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erard, B., and Feinstein, J. S. (1994a). Honesty and evasion in the tax compliance game. Rand Journal of Economics, 25(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erard, B., and Feinstein, J. S.(1994b). The role of moral sentiments and audit perceptions in tax compliance. Public Finance, 49 (Suppl.), 70–89.Google Scholar

Erard, B., and Ho, C. C. (2001). Searching for ghosts: Who are the nonfilers and how much tax do they owe? Journal of Public Economics, 81(1), 25–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eriksen, K., and Fallan, L. (1996). Tax knowledge and attitudes towards taxation: A report on a quasi-experiment. Journal of Economic Psychology, 17(3), 387–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Estes, W.s (1944). An experimental study of punishment. Psychological Monographs, 57 (reprinted in Boe, E. and Church, R. (1968) (eds.), Punishment: Issues and experiments (p. 108–65). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar

Etzioni, A. (1988). The moral dimension. Toward a new economy. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Falkinger, J. (1988). Tax evasion and equity: A theoretical analysis. Public Finance, 43(3), 388–95.Google Scholar

Falkinger, J.(1995). Tax evasion, consumption of public goods and fairness. Journal of Economic Psychology, 16(1), 63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Falkinger, J., and Walther, H. (1991). Rewards versus penalties: On a new policy against tax evasion. Public Finance Quarterly, 19(1), 67–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fallan, L. (1999). Gender, exposure to tax knowledge, and attitudes towards taxation. An experimental approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 18(2), 173–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fehr, E., Fischbacher, U., and Gächter, S. (2002). Strong reciprocity, human cooperation, and the enforcement of social norms. Human Nature, 13(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fehr, E., and Gächter, S. (1998). Reciprocity and economics. The economic implications of homo reciprocans. European Economic Review, 42(3–5), 845–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feld, L. P., and Frey, B. S. (2002). Trust breeds trust: How taxpayers are treated. Economics of Governance, 3(2), 87–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feld, L. P., and Frey, B. S.(2005a). Illegal, immoral, fattening or what? How deterrence and responsive regulation shape tax morale. In Bajada, C. and Schneider, F. (eds.), Size, causes and consequences of the underground economy (pp. 16–37). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Feld, L. P., and Frey, B. S.(2005b). Tax compliance as the result of a psychological tax contract: The role of incentives and responsive regulation. Retrieved 31 December 2005, from http://www.dur.ac.uk/john.ashworth/EPCS/Papers/Feld_Frey.pdf.

Feld, L. P., and Kirchgässner, G. (2000). Direct democracy, political culture, and the outcome of economic policy: A report on the Swiss experience. European Journal of Political Economy, 16(2), 287–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feld, L. P., and Tyran, J. R. (2002). Tax evasion and voting: An experimental analysis. Kyklos, 55(2), 197–221.Google Scholar

Ferster, C., Culbertson, S., and Perron Boren, M. (1975). Behavior principles (2nd edn). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Fetchenhauer, D. (2004). Different perspectives on prosocial and antisocial behavior. Kumulative Habilitation. Bochum: Ruhr-Universität Bochum.Google Scholar

Fischer, C. M., Wartick, M., and Mark, M. M. (1992). Detection probability and taxpayer compliance: A review of the literature. Journal of Accounting Literature, 11(1), 1–46.Google Scholar

Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Fishlow, A., and Friedman, J. (1994). Tax evasion, inflation and stabilization. Journal of Development Economics, 43(1), 105–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fjeldstad, O.-H. (2004). What's trust got to do with it? Non-payment of service charges in local authorities in South Africa. Journal of Modern African Studies, 42(4), 539–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fjeldstad, O.-H., and Semboja, J. (2001). Why people pay taxes: The case of the development levy in Tanzania. World Development, 29(12), 2,059–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fjeldstad, O.-H., and Tungodden, B. (2003). Fiscal corruption: A vice or a virtue? World Development, 31(8), 1,459–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franzoni, L. A. (2000). Tax evasion and tax compliance. In Bouckaert, B. and Geest, G. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics (vol. IV, pp. 51–94). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Freiberg, A. (1986). Enforcement discretion and taxation offences. Australian Tax Forum, 3(1), 55–91.Google Scholar

French, J. R. P., and Raven, B. H. (1959). The basis of social power. In Cartwright, D. (ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150–67). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Frey, B. S. (1992). Tertium datur – pricing, regulating and intrinsic motivation. Kyklos, 45(2), 161–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frey, B. S.(1997). Not just for the money: An economic theory of personal motivation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Frey, B. S.(2003). Deterrence and tax morale in the European Union. European Review, 11(3), 385–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frey, B. S.(2004). Politische Partizipation und Steuermoral. In Bizer, K., Falk, A. and Lange, J. (eds.), Am Staat vorbei. Transparenz, Fairness und Partizipation kontra Steuerhinterziehung (pp. 47–57). Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frey, B. S., and Feld, L. P. (2002). Deterrence and morale in taxation: An empirical analysis: Working Paper No. 760. CESifo GmbH.

Frey, B. S., and Weck-Hannemann, H. (1984). The hidden economy as an ‘unobserved’ variable. European Economic Review, 26(1), 33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedland, N. (1982). A note on tax evasion as a function of the quality of information about the magnitude and credibility of threatened fines: Some preliminary research. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 12(1), 54–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedland, N., Maital, S., and Rutenberg, A. (1978). A simulation study of income tax evasion. Journal of Public Economics, 10(1), 107–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frijters, P. (2000). Do individuals try to maximize general satisfaction? Journal of Economic Psychology, 21(3), 281–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Furnham, A. (2005). Understanding the meaning of tax: Young people's knowledge of the principles of taxation. Journal of Socio-Economics, 34(5), 703–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garland, H., Sandefur, C. A., and Rogers, A. C. (1990). De-escalation of commitment in oil exploration: When sunk costs and negative feedback coincide. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(6), 721–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gassner, W. (1983). Steuervermeidung, Steuerumgehung, Steuerhinterziehung. Unpublished manuscript. Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration.

Gehring, W. J., and Willoughby, A. R. (2002). The medial frontal cortex and rapid processing of monetary gains and losses. Science, 295(5563), 2279–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gërxhani, K. (2004). Tax evasion in transition: Outcome of an institutional clash? Testing Feige's conjecture in Albania. European Economic Review, 48(4), 729–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gërxhani, K.(2006). ‘Did you pay your taxes? How (not) to conduct tax evasion surveys in transition countries’. Social Indicators Research, 80(4), 555–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gërxhani, K., and Schram, A. (2006). Tax evasion and income source: A comparative experimental study. Journal of Economic Psychology, 27(3), 202–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gintis, H., Bowles, S., Boyd, R., and Fehr, E. (2003). Explaining altruistic behavior in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24(3), 153–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative ‘description of personality’: The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1,216–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(1), 161–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Granger, J. (2005). Focus on compliance issues for the Tax Office in 2005. Retrieved 5 August 2005, from http://www.ato.gov.au/corporate/content.asp?doc=/content/55484.htm.

Grasmick, H. G., and Bursik, R. J. Jr (1990). Conscience, significant others, and rational choice: Extending the deterrence model. Law and Society Review, 24(3), 837–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grasmick, H. G., Bursik, R. J., and Cochran, J. K. (1991). ‘Render unto Caesar what is Caesar's’: Religiosity and taxpayers' inclinations to cheat. The Sociological Quarterly, 32(2), 251–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grasso, L., and Kaplan, S. E. (1998). An examination of ethical standards. Journal of Accounting Education, 16(1), 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gravelle, H., and Rees, R. (1981). Microeconomics. London: Longman Group Ltd.Google Scholar

Green, D. P., Kahneman, D., and Kunreuther, H. (1994). How the scope and method of public funding affect willingness to pay for public goods. Public Opinion Quarterly, 58(1), 49–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grimm, O. (2005). Gespenst der Flat Tax geht um. Die Presse (12 September), p. 4.

Groenland, E. A. (1992). Developing a dynamic research strategy for the economic psychological study of taxation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 13(4), 589–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Groenland, E. A. G., and Veldhoven, G. M. (1983). Tax evasion behavior: A psychological framework. Journal of Economic Psychology, 3(2), 129–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gruening, G. (2001). Origin and theoretical basis of New Public Management. International Public Management Journal, 4(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guala, F., and Mittone, L. (2005). Experiments in economics: external validity and the robustness of phenomena. Journal of Economic Methodology, 12(4), 495–515.CrossRef

Güth, W., and Sausgruber, R. (2004). Tax morale and optimal taxation: CESifo Working Paper No. 1284. CESifo GmbH.

Halperin, R., and Tzur, J. (1990). Tax evasion and the low penalty, low audit rate phenomenon. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 9(3), 179–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hamilton, A. (1999). IRS enforcement drops sharply. Tax Notes (8 April), p. 188.

Hansford, A., and Hasseldine, J. D. (2002). Best practice in tax administration. Public Money and Management, 22(1), 5–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hardin, R. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162 (3859), 1243–8.Google ScholarPubMed

Haslam, S. A. (2001). Psychology in organzations: The social identity approach. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Hasseldine, J. D. (1998a). Prospect theory and tax reporting decisions: Implications for tax administrators. International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation, 52(11), 501–5.Google Scholar

Hasseldine, J. D.(1998b). Tax amnesties: An international review. Bulletin for International Fiscal Documentation, 52(7), 303–10.Google Scholar

Hasseldine, J. D., and Bebbington, K. J. (1991). Blending economic deterrence and fiscal psychology models in the design of responses to tax evasion: The New Zealand experience. Journal of Economic Psychology, 12(2), 299–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hasseldine, J. D., and Hite, P. A. (2003). Framing, gender and tax compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24(4), 517–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hasseldine, J. D., and Kaplan, S. E. (1992). The effect of different sanction communications on hypothetical taxpayer compliance: Policy implications from New Zealand. Public Finance, 47(1), 45–60.Google Scholar

Hasseldine, J. D., and Li, Z. (1999). More tax evasion research required in new millennium. Crime Law and Social Change, 31(2), 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heath, C., Larrick, R. P., and Wu, G. (1999). Goals as reference points. Cognitive Psychology, 38(1), 79–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Helson, H. (1964). Adaption-level theory. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Herbert, M. (1989). Discipline: A positive guide for parents. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hessing, D. J., Elffers, H., Robben, H. S. J., and Webley, P. (1993). Needy or greedy – the social-psychology of individuals who fraudulently claim unemployment benefits. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23(3), 226–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hessing, D. J., Elffers, H., and Weigel, R. H. (1988). Exploring the limits of self-reports and reasoned action: An investigation of the psychology of tax evasion behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(3), 405–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hessing, D. J., Kinsey, K. A., Elffers, H., and Weigel, R. H. (1988). Tax evasion research: Measurement strategies and theoretical models. In Raaij, W. F., Veldhoven, G. M. and Warneryd, K. E. (eds.), Handbook of economic psychology (pp. 516–37). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Higgins, E. T. (1998a). From expectancies to worldviews: Regulatory focus in socialization and cognition. In Darley, J. M. (ed.), Attribution and social interaction. The legacy of Edward E. Jones (pp. 243–69). Washington, DC: APA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Higgins, E. T.(1998b). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. In Zanna, M. P. (ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. XXX, pp. 1–46). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Higgins, E. T.(2002). How self-regulation creates distinct values: The case of promotion and prevention decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(3), 177–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hill, T. P. (1995). The significant-digit phenomenon. American Mathematical Monthly, 102(4), 322–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hite, P. A. (1987). An application of attribution theory in taxpayer noncompliance research. Public Finance, 42(1), 105–18.Google Scholar

Hite, P. A.(1988). An examination of the impact of subject selection on hypothetical and self-reported taxpayer noncompliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 9(4), 445–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hite, P. A.(1989). A positive approach to taxpayer compliance. Public Finance, 44(2), 249–67.Google Scholar

Hite, P. A.(1990). An experimental investigation of the effect of tax shelters on taxpayer noncompliance. Public Finance/Finances Publiques, 45(1), 90–108.Google Scholar

Hite, P. A., and Hasseldine, J. D. (2003). Tax practitioner credentials and the incidence of IRS audit adjustments. American Accounting Association, 17(1), 1–14.Google Scholar

Hite, P. A., and McGill, G. A. (1992). An examination of taxpayer preference for aggressive tax advice. National Tax Journal, 45(4), 389–403.Google Scholar

Hodson, G., and Olson, J. M. (2005). Testing the generality of the name letter effect: Name initials and everyday attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(8), 1,099–111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. London: Routledge and Paul Kegan.Google Scholar

Horton, S. (2003). Guest editorial: Participation and involvement: The democratisation of new public management? International Journal of Public Sector Management, 16(6), 403–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hume, E. C., Larkins, E. R., and Iyer, G. (1999). On compliance with ethical standards in tax return preparation. Journal of Business Ethics, 18(2), 229–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hyman, I., McDowell, E., and Raines, B. (1977). Corporal punishment and alternatives in the schools: An overview of theoretical and practical issues. In Wise, J. (ed.), Proceedings: Conference on corporal punishment in the schools (pp. 1–18). Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.Google Scholar

IRS (1978). A dictionary of compliance factors. Washington, DC: Government Publishing Office.

Jackson, B. R., and Milliron, V. (1986). Tax compliance research: Findings, problems, and prospects. Journal of Accounting Literature, 5(1), 125–65.Google Scholar

Jackson, B. R., Milliron, V. C., and Toy, D. R. (1988). Tax practitioners and the government. Tax Notes (17 October), pp. 333–8.Google Scholar

James, S. (1998, July). The behaviour of revenue services as a variable in tax administration and taxpayer compliance. Paper presented at the 10th International Conference on Socioeconomics. SASE/SABE, Vienna, Austria.

James, S., and Alley, C. (2002). Tax compliance, self-assessment and tax administration. Journal of Finance and Management in Public Services, 2(2), 27–42.Google Scholar

James, S., Hasseldine, J. D., Hite, P. A., and Toumi, M. (2003). Tax compliance policy: An international comparison and new evidence on normative appeals and auditing. Paper presented at the ESRC Future Governance Workshop, Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna, Austria.

Job, J., and Honaker, D. (2003). Short-term experience with responsive regulation in the Australian Taxation Office. In Braithwaite, V. (ed.), Taxing democracy. Understanding tax avoidance and evasion (pp. 111–29). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Job, J., and Reinhart, M. (2003). Trusting the tax office: Does Putnam's thesis relate to tax? Australian Journal of Social Issues, 38(3), 307–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Job, J., Stout, A., and Smith, R. (2007). Culture change in three taxation administrations: From command-and-control to responsive regulation. Law and Policy, 29(1), 84–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahneman, D. (1994). New challenges to the rationality assumption. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 150(1), 18–36.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., and Tversky, A. (1982). Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A.(1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39(4), 341–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaplan, S. E., Reckers, P. M. J., and Reynolds, K. D. (1986). An application of attribution and equity theories to tax evasion behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology, 7(4), 461–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kemp, S. (2004). Preferences for funding particular government services from flat or progressive tax. Paper presented at the Joint SABE/IAREP Annual Colloquium, Philadelphia, PA.

Kim, C. K. (2002). Does fairness matter in tax reporting behavior? Journal of Economic Psychology, 23(6), 771–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

King, S., and Sheffrin, S. M. (2002). Tax evasion and equity theory: An investigative approach. International Tax and Public Finance, 9(4), 505–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kinsey, K. A., and Grasmick, H. G. (1993). Did the tax reform act of 1986 improve compliance? Three studies of pre- and post-TRA compliance attitudes. Law and Policy, 15(4), 239–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kinsey, K. A., Grasmick, H. G., and Smith, K. W. (1991). Framing justice: Taxpayer evaluations of personal tax burdens. Law and Society Review, 25(4), 845–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirchgässner, G., Feld, L. P., and Savioz, M. R. (1999). Die direkte Demokratie. Munich: Vahlen.Google Scholar

Kirchler, E. (1997a). Balance between giving and receiving: Tax morality and satisfaction with fiscal policy as they relate to the perceived just distribution of public resources. Reitaku International Journal of Economic Studies, 5(1), 59–70.Google Scholar

Kirchler, E.(1997b). The burden of new taxes: Acceptance of taxes as a function of affectedness and egoistic versus altruistic orientation. Journal of Socio-Economics, 26(4), 421–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirchler, E.(1998). Differential representations of taxes: Analysis of free associations and judgments of five employment groups. Journal of Socio-Economics, 27(1), 117–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirchler, E.(1999). Reactance to taxation: Employers' attitudes towards taxes. Journal of Socio-Economics, 28(2), 131–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirchler, E., and Berger, M. M. (1998). Macht die Gelegenheit den Dieb? In Jahrbuch für Absatz- und Konsumentenforschung (vol. 44), pp. 439–62.Google Scholar

Kirchler, E., and Hölzl, E. (2003). Economic psychology. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 18(1), 29–80.Google Scholar

Kirchler, E., and Maciejovsky, B. (2001). Tax compliance within the context of gain and loss situations, expected and current asset position, and profession. Journal of Economic Psychology, 22(2), 173–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirchler, E., Maciejovsky, B., and Schneider, F. (2003). Everyday representations of tax avoidance, tax evasion, and tax flight: Do legal differences matter? Journal of Economic Psychology, 24(4), 535–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirchler, E., Maciejovsky, B., and Schwarzenberger, H. (2005). Specious confidence after tax audits: A contribution to the dynamics of compliance. Unpublished manuscript, University of Vienna, Austria.

Kirchler, E., Maciejovsky, B., and Weber, M. (2005). Framing effects, selective information, and market behavior: An experimental analysis. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 6(2), 90–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirchler, E., Muehlbacher, S., Hölzl, E., and Webley, P. (2005). Effort and aspirations in tax evasion: Experimental evidence. Unpublished manuscript, University of Vienna, Austria.

Kirchler, E., Niemirowski, P., and Wearing, A. (eds.) (2006). Shared subjective views, intent to cooperate and tax compliance: Similarities between Australian taxpayers and tax officers. Journal of Economic Psychology, 27(4), 502–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stages and sequences: The cognitive development approach to socialization. In Goslin, D. (ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research. Chicago, IL: Rand McNelly.Google Scholar

Kramer, R. M. (1999). Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), 569–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kramer, R. M., and Tyler, T. R. (1996). Trust in organizations. Frontiers of theory and research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Lamnek, S., Olbrich, G., and Schaefer, W. (2000). Tatort Sozialstaat: Schwarzarbeit, Leistungsmissbrauch, Steuerhinterziehung und ihre (Hinter)Gruende. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Landsberger, M., and Meilijson, I. (1982). Incentive generating state dependent penalty system: The case of income tax evasion. Journal of Public Economics, 19(3), 333–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lang, O., Nöhrbass, K.-H., and Stahl, K. (1997). On income tax avoidance: The case of Germany. Journal of Public Economics, 66(2), 327–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lea, S., Tarpy, R. M., and Webley, P. (1987). The individual in the economy. A survey of economic psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lenartova, G. (2003). Prepared tax reform in the Slovak Republic according to the criteria of tax theory and practice. Ekonomicky Casopis, 51(6), 664.Google Scholar

Leuthold, J. H. (1983). Home production and the tax system. Journal of Economic Psychology, 3(2), 145–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In Gergen, K. J., Greenberg, M. S. and Willis, R. H. (eds.), Social exchange (pp. 27–55). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lévy-Garboua, L., Masclet, D., and Montmarquette, C. (2005) A micro-foundation for the Laffer curve in a real effort experiment. Retrieved 30 March 2006, from ftp://mse.univ-paris1.fr/pub/mse/cahiers2005/Bla05071.pdf.

Lewin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., and Gaeth, G. S. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76(2), 149–88.Google Scholar

Lewis, A. (1978). Perception of tax rates. British Tax Review, 6, 358–66.Google Scholar

Lewis, A.(1979). An empirical assessment of tax mentality. Public Finance, 34(2), 245–57.Google Scholar

Lewis, A.(1982). The psychology of taxation. Oxford: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar

Liebig, S., and Mau, S. (2005). When is a tax system just? Attitudes towards general principles of taxation and the justice of tax burdens. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 34(6), 468–91.Google Scholar

Lin, W.-Z., and Yang, C. C. (2001). A dynamic portfolio choice model of tax evasion: Comparative statics of tax rates and its implication for economic growth. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 25(11), 1,827–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lind, E. A., and Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lochbuy, T. M., and O'Rourke, R. J. (1996). Catching tax cheats using meta-alphabetological analysis. Australian Tax Review, 25 (June), 79–82.Google Scholar

Loewenstein, G., and Issacharoff, S. (1994). Source dependence in the valuation of objects. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 7(3), 157–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Long, S. B., and Schwartz, R. D. (1987). The impact of IRS audits on taxpayer compliance: A field experiment in specific deterrence. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Law and Society Association, Washington, DC.

Long, S. B., and Swingen, J. A. (1991). Taxpayer compliance: Setting new agendas for research. Law and Society Review, 25(3), 637–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacCoun, R. J. (2005). Voice, control, and belonging: The double-edged sword of procedural fairness. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 1(1), 171–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Malik, A. S., and Schwab, R. M. (1991). The economics of tax amnesties. Journal of Public Economics, 46(1), 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marshall, R. L., Armstrong, R. W., and Smith, M. (1998). The ethical environment of tax practitioners: Western Australian evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(12), 1,265–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mason, R., and Calvin, L. D. (1978). A study of admitted income tax evasion. Law and Society Review, 13 (Fall), 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McBarnet, D. (2001). When compliance is not the solution but the problem: From changes in law to changes in attitude. Canberra: Australian National University, Centre for Tax System Integrity.Google Scholar

McBarnett, D. (1992). Legitimate rackets: Tax evasion, tax avoidance, and the boundaries of the law. The Journal of Human Justice, 3(2), 56–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCaffery, E. J., and Baron, J. (2003). Heuristics and biases in thinking about tax. Retrieved 30 April 2005, from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=467440.

McCaffery, E. J., and Baron, J.(2004). Framing and taxation: Evaluation of tax policies involving household composition. Journal of Economic Psychology, 25(6), 679–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCrae, R. R., and Costa, P. T. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60(2), 175–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McKerchar, M. (1995). Understanding small business taxpayers: Their sources of information and level of knowledge of taxation. Australian Tax Forum, 12(1), 25–41.Google Scholar

McKerchar, M.(2001). The study of income tax complexity and unintentional noncompliance: Research method and preliminary findings. ATAX Discussion paper. University of Sydney, Orange.

Meier, K., and Kirchler, E. (1998). Social representations of the euro in Austria. Journal of Economic Psychology, 19(6), 755–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mercer, J. (2005). Prospect theory and political science. Annual Review of Political Science, 8(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mérö, L. (1996). Optimal entscheiden. Spieltheorie und die Logik unseres Handelns. Basel: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar

Messick, D. M., and Brewer, M. B. (1983). Solving social dilemmas: A review. In Weeler, L. and Shaver, P. (eds.), Review of personality and social psychology (pp. 231–240). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Milliron, V. (1988). A conceptual model of factors influencing tax preparers' aggressiveness. In Moriarity, S. and Collins, J. H. (eds.), Contemporary tax research (pp. 1–15). Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma.Google Scholar

Milliron, V., and Toy, D. (1988). Tax compliance: An investigation of key features. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 9(2), 84–104.Google Scholar

Mittone, L. (1999). Psychological constraints on tax evasion: An empirical approach. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Bristol University.

Mittone, L.(2002). Individual styles of tax evasion: An experimental study. Retrieved 30 April 2005, from http://www.inomics.com/cgi/repec?handle=RePEc:wop:uteepu.

Mittone, L.(2006). Dynamic behaviours in tax evasion. An experimental approach. Retrieved 30 April 2005, from http://www.inomics.com/cgi/repec?handle=RePEc:wop:uteepu.

Moscovici, S. (1961). La Psychanalyse, son image et son public. Paris: Presse Universitaire de France.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S.(2001). The phenomenon of social representations. In Moscovici, S. and Duveen, G. (eds.), Social representations: Explorations in social psychology (pp. 18–77). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Moser, D. V., Evans, J. H. III, and Kim, C. K. (1995). The effects of horizontal and exchange inequity on tax reporting decisions. Accounting Review, 70(4), 619–34.Google Scholar

Moser, H. (1994). Zur Kritik der Sprache von Gesetzen. Anmerkungen eines Sprachwissenschaftlers. In Smekal, C. and Theurl, E. (eds.), Stand und Entwicklung der Finanzpsychologie (pp. 171–84). Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar

Mumford, A. (2001). Taxing culture. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Murphy, K. (2003a). An examination of taxpayers' attitudes towards the Australian tax system: Findings from a survey of tax scheme investors. Australian Tax Forum, 18(2), 209–42.Google Scholar

Murphy, K.(2003b). Preventing widespread resistance to decisions: The role of trust in regulating taxpayers. Paper presented at the 28th Annual IAREP Colloquium, Christchurch, New Zealand.Google Scholar

Murphy, K.(2003c). Procedural justice and tax compliance. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 38(3), 379–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murphy, K.(2004a). Aggressive tax planning: Differentiating those playing the game from those who don't. Journal of Economic Psychology, 25(3), 307–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murphy, K.(2004b). The role of trust in nurturing compliance: A study of accused tax avoiders. Law and Human Behavior, 28(2), 187–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Myles, G. D. (2000). Wasteful government, tax evasion, and the provision of public goods. European Journal of Political Economy, 16(1), 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nationmaster-Encyclopedia (2005). Retrieved 6 July 2005, from http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Gambler%27s-fallacy.

Newcomb, S. (1881). Note on the frequency of use of the different digits in natural numbers. American Journal of Mathematics, 4(1–4), 39–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Niemirowski, P., Baldwin, S., and Wearing, A. (2001). Thirty years of tax compliance research: Of what use is it to the ATO? In Walpole, M. and Evans, C. (eds.), Tax administration in the 21st century (pp. 199–214). St Leonards: Prospect Media.Google Scholar

Niemirowski, P., and Wearing, A. (2003). Taxation agents and taxpayer compliance. Journal of Australian Taxation, 6(2), 166–200.Google Scholar

Niemirowski, P., Wearing, A. J., Baldwin, S., Leonard, B., and Mobbs, C. (2002). The influence of tax related behaviours, beliefs, attitudes and values on Australian taxpayer compliance. Is tax avoidance intentional and how serious an offence is it? Sydney: University of New South Wales.Google Scholar

Nigrini, M. J. (1996). A taxpayer compliance application of Benford's Law. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 18(1), 72–91.Google Scholar

Nigrini, M. J.(1999). I've got your number. Journal of Accountancy, 187 (May), 79–83.Google Scholar

Noga, T., and Arnold, V. (2002). Do tax decision support systems affect the accuracy of tax compliance decisions? International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 3(3), 125–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O'Donnell, E., Koch, B., and Boone, J. (2005). The influence of domain knowledge and task complexity on tax professionals' compliance recommendations. Accounting Organizations and Society, 30(2), 145–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

OECD (2004). Guidance note. Compliance risk management: Managing and improving tax compliance. Retrieved 30 September 2006 from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/44/19/33818656.pdf.

Orviska, M., and Hudson, J. (2002). Tax evasion, civic duty and the law abiding citizen. European Journal of Political Economy, 19(1), 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Owens, J., and Hamilton, S. (2004). Experience and innovations in other countries. In Aaron, H. J. and Slemrod, J. (eds.), The crisis in tax administration (pp. 347–88). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar

Park, C. G., and Hyun, J. K. (2003). Examining the determinants of tax compliance by experimental data: A case of Korea. Journal of Policy Modeling, 25(8), 673–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paternoster, R., and Simpson, S. (1996). Sanction threats and appeals to morality: Testing a rational choice model of corporate crime. Law and Society Review, 30(3), 549–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Payne, J. L. (1993). Costly returns: The burdens of the U.S. tax system. San Francisco, CA: ICS Press.Google Scholar

Peabody, D. (1985). National characteristics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pelzman, S. (1976). Toward a more general theory of regulation. Journal of Law and Economics, 19(2), 211–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pelzmann, L. (1985). Wirtschaftspsychologie. Arbeitslosenforschung, Schattenwirtschaft, Steuerpsychologie. Vienna: Springer.Google Scholar

Pingle, M. (1997). Submitting to authority: Its effect on decision-making. Journal of Economic Psychology, 18(1), 45–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pommerehne, W., and Frey, B. S. (1992). The effects of tax administration on tax morale (Series II, No. 191): University of Konstanz.Google Scholar

Pommerehne, W., Hart, A., and Frey, B. S. (1994). Tax morale, tax evasion and the choice of policy instruments in different political systems. Public Finance, 49 (Suppl.), 52–69.Google Scholar

Pommerehne, W., and Weck-Hannemann, H. (1992). Steuerhinterziehung: Einige romantische, realistische und nicht zuletzt empirische Befunde. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, 112(3), 433–66.Google Scholar

Pommerehne, W., and Weck-Hannemann, H.(1996). Tax rates, tax administration and income tax evasion in Switzerland. Public Choice, 88(1–2), 161–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poppe, M. (2005). The specificity of social dilemma situations. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26(3), 431–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Porcano, T. M. (1988). Correlates of tax evasion. Journal of Economic Psychology, 9(1), 47–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Porschke, C., and Witte, E. H. (2002). Psychologische Faktoren der Steuergerechtigkeit. Wirtschaftspsychologie, 4(1), 34–44.Google Scholar

Rabin, M. (1998). Psychology and economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(1), 11–46.Google Scholar

Rawlings, G. (2003). Cultural narratives of taxation and citizenship: Fairness, groups and globalisation. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 38(3), 269–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rawlings, G.(2004). Law, liquidity and eurobonds. The Journal of Pacific History, 39(3), 325–41.Google Scholar

Reckers, P. M. J., Sanders, D. L., and Roark, S. J. (1994). The influence of ethical attitudes on taxpayer compliance. National Tax Journal, 47(4), 825–36.Google Scholar

Reinganum, J. F., and Wilde, L. L. (1985). Income tax compliance in a principal-agent framework. Journal of Public Economics, 26(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reinganum, J. F., and Wilde, L. L.(1988). A note on enforcement uncertainty and taxpayer compliance. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 103(4), 793–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Richardson, M., and Sawyer, A. (2001). A taxonomy of the tax compliance literature: Further findings, problems and prospects. Australian Tax Forum, 16(2), 137–320.Google Scholar

Robben, H. S. J. (1991). A behavioral simulation and documented behavior approach to income tax evasion. Deventer: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Robben, H. S. J., Webley, P., Elffers, H., and Hessing, D. J. (1989). A cross-national comparison of attitudes, personality, behaviour, and social comparison in tax evasion experiments. In Grunert, K. and Ölander, F. (eds.), Understanding economic behaviour (pp. 121–34). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robben, H. S. J., Webley, P., Elffers, H., and Hessing, D. J.(1990a). Decision frames, opportunity and tax evasion: An experimental approach. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 14(3), 353–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robben, H. S. J., Webley, P., Weigel, R. H., Wärneryd, K. E., Kinsey, K. A., Hessing, D. J., Alvira Martin, F., Elffers, H., Wahlund, R., Langenhove, L., Long, S. B., and Scholz, J. (1990b). Decision frame and opportunity as determinants of tax cheating: An international experimental study. Journal of Economic Psychology, 11(3), 341–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roberts, M. L., and Hite, P. A. (1994). Progressive taxation, fairness and compliance. Law and Policy, 16 (January), 27–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roberts, M. L., Hite, P. A., and Bradley, C. F. (1994). Understanding attitudes toward progressive taxation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 58(2), 165–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rogoff, E. G., and Lee, M.-S. (1996). Does firm origin matter? An empirical examination of types of small business owners and entrepreneurs. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(2), 1–17.Google Scholar

Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Sakurai, Y., and Braithwaite, V. (2003). Taxpayers' perceptions of practitioners: Finding one who is effective and does the right thing? Journal of Business Ethics, 46(4), 375–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sandmo, A. (2003). Three decades of tax evasion: A perspective on the literature. Paper presented at the Skatteforum (The Research Forum on Taxation), Rosendal, Norway.

Sanson, A., Montgomery, B., Gault, U., Gridley, H., and Thomson, D. (1996). Punishment and behaviour change: An Australian Psychological Society position paper. Australian Psychologist, 31(3), 157–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schadewald, M. S. (1989). Reference point effects in taxpayer decision making. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 10(2), 68–84.Google Scholar

Schepanski, A., and Kelsey, D. (1990). Testing for framing effects in taxpayer compliance decisions. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 12(2), 60–77.Google Scholar

Schepanski, A., and Shearer, T. (1995). A prospect theory account of the income tax withholding phenomenon. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63(2), 174–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmidt, D. R. (2001). The prospects of taxpayer agreement with aggressive tax advice. Journal of Economic Psychology, 22(2), 157–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmölders, G. (1959). Fiscal psychology: A new branch of public finance. National Tax Journal, 12 (December), 340–5.Google Scholar

Schmölders, G.(1960). Das Irrationale in der öffentlichen Finanzwirtschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Schmölders, G.(1964). Finanzwissenschaft und Finanzpolitik. Tübingen: J. c. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).Google Scholar

Schmölders, G.(1970a). Finanzpolitik (3th edn). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Schmölders, G.(1970b). Survey research in public finance: A behavioural approach to fiscal theory. Public Finance, 25(2), 300–306.Google Scholar

Schmölders, G.(1975). Einführung in die Geld- und Finanzpsychologie. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar

Schneider, F. (2003). Zunehmende Schattenwirtschaft in Deutschland: Eine wirtschafts- und staatspolitische Herausforderung. Vierteljahreshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, 72(1), 148–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schneider, F., and Enste, D. (2000). Shadow economies: size, causes, and consequences. The Journal of Economic Literature, 38(1), 77–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schneider, F., and Klinglmair, R. (2004). Shadow economics around the world: What do we know? Retrieved 25 April 2005, from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=518526.

Scholz, J. T., and Pinney, N. (1995). Duty, fear and tax compliance – the heuristic basis of citizenship behaviour. American Journal of Political Science, 39(2), 490–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwartz, R., and Orleans, S. (1967). On legal sanctions. University of Chicago Law Review, 34 (Winter), 274–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Seidl, C., and Traub, S. (2001). Taxpayers' attitudes, behavior, and perception of fairness. Pacific Economic Review, 6(2), 255–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Seidl, C., and Traub, S.(2002). Die Akzeptanz des deutschen Steuersystems: Eine demoskopische Untersuchung. In Theurl, E. and Thöni, E. (eds.), Zukunftsperspektiven der Finanzierung öffentlicher Aufgaben (pp. 7–27). Vienna: Böhlau.Google Scholar

Seldon, A. (ed.). (1979). Tax avoision: The economic, legal and moral inter-relationships between avoidance and evasion. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar

Seligman, M. (1992). Helplessness. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar

Shefrin, H. M., and Thaler, R. H. (1988). The behavioral life-cycle hypothesis. Economic Inquiry, 26(4), 609–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shelak, B. J. (1997). The impact of the U.S. underground activity. A note relating to the impact on state finances. Journal of Government Information, 24(2), 113–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Siegel, S., and Fouraker, L. (1960). Bargaining and group decision making. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Sigala, M., Burgoyne, C., and Webley, P. (1999). Tax communication and social influence: Evidence from a British sample. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 9(3), 237–41.3.0.CO;2-7>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simpson, S. S. (2002). Corporate crime, law, and social control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skinner, B. (1938). The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century Crofts.Google Scholar

Slemrod, J. (1985). An empirical test for tax evasion. Review of Economics and Statistics, 67(2), 232–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Slemrod, J.(ed.). (1992). Why people pay taxes: Tax compliance and enforcement. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Slemrod, J., Blumenthal, M., and Christian, C. (2001). Taxpayer response to an increased probability of audit: Evidence from a controlled experiment in Minnesota. Journal of Public Economics, 79(3), 455–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, K. W., and Kinsey, K. A. (1987). Understanding taxpaying behaviour: A conceptual framework with implications for research. Law and Society Review, 21(4), 639–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, K. W., and Stalans, L. J. (1991). Encouraging tax compliance with positive incentives: A conceptual framework and research directions. Law and Policy, 13(1), 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, V. L. (1962). An experimental study of competitive market behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 70(2), 111–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, V. L.(1964). Effect of market organization on competitive equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 78 (May), 181–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Snow, A., and Warren, R. S. J. (2005). Tax evasion under random audits with uncertain detection. Economics Letters, 88(1), 97–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Song, Y.-D., and Yarbrough, T. E. (1978). Tax ethics and taxpayer attitudes: A survey. Public Administration Review, 38(5), 442–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Souleles, N. (1999). The response of household consumption to income tax refunds. American Economic Review, 89(4), 947–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spicer, M. W., and Becker, L. A. (1980). Fiscal inequity and tax evasion: An experimental approach. National Tax Journal, 33(2), 171–5.Google Scholar

Spicer, M. W., and Hero, R. E. (1985). Tax evasion and heuristics: A research note. Journal of Public Economics, 26(2), 263–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spicer, M. W., and Lundstedt, S. B. (1976). Understanding tax evasion. Public Finance, 21(2), 295–305.Google Scholar

Spicer, M. W., and Thomas, J. E. (1982). Audit probabilities and tax evasion decision: An experimental approach. Journal of Economic Psychology, 2(3), 241–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Srinivasan, T. N. (1973). Tax evasion: A model. Journal of Public Economics, 2(4), 339–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stainer, A., Stainer, L., and Segal, A. (1997). The ethics of tax planning. Business Ethics. A European Review, 6(7), 213–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stalans, L. J., and Lind, E. A. (1997). The meaning of procedural fairness: A comparison of taxpayers' and representatives' views of their tax audits. Social Justice Research, 10(3), 311–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stella, P. (1991). An economic analysis of tax amnesties. Journal of Public Economics, 46(3), 283–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stigler, G. (1971). The theory of economic regulation. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management, 2 (Spring), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stroebe, W., and Frey, B. S. (1982). Self-interest and collective action: The economics and psychology of public goods. British Journal of Social Psychology, 21(2), 121–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strümpel, B. (1966). Disguised tax burden compliance costs of German business men and professionals. National Tax Journal, 19(1), 70–77.Google Scholar

Strümpel, B.(1969). The contribution of survey research to public finance. In Peacock, A. T. (ed.), Quantitative analysis in public finance (pp. 13–22). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

Tan, L. M. (1999). Taxpayers' preference for type of advice from tax practitioner: A preliminary examination. Journal of Economic Psychology, 20(4), 431–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tanzi, V., and Shome, P. (1994). A primer on tax evasion. International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation, 48(6–7), 328–37.Google Scholar

Taylor, N. (2001). Social justice. In Brown, R. and Gaertner, S. (eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intergroup processes (pp. 344–64). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Taylor, N.(2003). Understanding taxpayer attitudes through understanding taxpayer identities. In Braithwaite, V. (ed.), Taxing democracy. Understanding tax avoidance and evasion (pp. 71–92). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Thaler, R. H. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1(1), 39–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thaler, R. H.(1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science, 4(3), 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thaler, R. H., and Johnson, E. J. (1990). Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Management Science, 36(6), 643–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thibaut, J., Fredland, N., and Walker, L. (1974). Compliance with rules: Some social determinants. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30(6), 792–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thibaut, J., and Walker, L. (1978). A theory of procedure. California Law Review, 66(4), 541–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomas, J. K. (1989). Unusual patterns in reported earnings. The Accounting Review, 64(4), 773–87.Google Scholar

Thorndike, E. (1898). Animal intelligence. Psychological Review Monograph Supplement, 2(4, Whole No. 8).Google Scholar

Thorndike, J. J., and Ventry, D. J. J. (eds.). (2002). Tax justice: The ongoing debate. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar

Thurman, Q., St John, C., and Riggs, L. (1984). Neutralization and tax evasion: How effective would a moral appeal be in improving compliance to tax laws? Law and Policy, 6(3), 309–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tibbetts, S. G., Joulfaian, D., and Rider, M. (1997). Shame and rational choice in offending decisions: Tax evasion in the presence of negative income tax rates. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 24(2), 234–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Torgler, B. (2002). Speaking to theorists and searching for facts: Tax morale and tax compliance in experiments. Journal of Economic Surveys, 16(5), 657–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Torgler, B.(2003a). Does culture matter? Tax morale in an East-West-German comparison. FinanzArchiv, 59(4), 504–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Torgler, B.(2003b). Tax morale in transition countries. Post-Communist Economies, 15(3), 357–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Torgler, B.(2003c). Tax morale, rule-governed behaviour and trust. Constitutional Political Economy, 14(2), 119–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Torgler, B.(2003d). To evade taxes or not to evade: That is the question. Journal of Socio-Economics, 32(3), 283–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Torgler, B.(2005a). Tax morale and direct democracy. European Journal of Political Economy, 21(2), 525–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Torgler, B.(2005b). Tax morale in Latin America. Public Choice, 122(1–2), 133–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Torgler, B. and Schneider, F. (2004). Does culture influence tax morale? Evidence from different European countries. CREMA Working Paper No. 2004-17. Basel: Center for Research in Economics, Management and Arts.

Traub, S. (1998). The framing of tax reliefs. Public Finance, 53(2), 243–62.Google Scholar

Traub, S.(1999). Framing effects in taxation: An empirical study using the German tax schedule. Heidelberg: Physica.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Traub, S.(2000). Rahmungseffekte und die Kunst der Besteuerung. Wirtschaftsdienst. Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik, 80(12), 745–50.Google Scholar

Trivedi, V. U., Shehata, M., and Lynn, B. (2003). Impact of personal and situational factors on taxpayer compliance: An experimental analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 47(3), 175–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trivedi, V. U., Shehata, M., and Mestelman, S. (2004). Attitudes, incentives, and tax compliance. Hamilton: McMaster University, Department of Economics.Google Scholar

Turner, J. C., Hogg, M., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., and Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group. A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Turner, J. C., and Onorato, R. (1997). Social identity, personality and the self-concept: A self-categorisation perspective. In Tyler, T., Kramer, R., Roderick, M. and John, O. (eds.), The psychology of the social self: Applied social research (pp. 11–46). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185 (4157), 1,124–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D.(1981). The framing of decisions and psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D.(1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why people obey the law: Procedural justice, legitimacy, and compliance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Tyler, T. R.(1994). Psychological models of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(5), 850–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tyler, T. R.(2001a). Public trust and confidence in legal authorities: What do majority and minority group members want from the law and legal institutions? Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 19(2), 215–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tyler, T. R.(2001b). Trust and law abidingness: A proactive model of social regulation. Boston University Law Review, 81(2), 361–406.Google Scholar

Tyler, T. R.(2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57(1), 375–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tyler, T. R., and De Cremer, D. (2006). How do we promote cooperation in groups, organizations, and societies? In Lange, P. A. M. (ed.), Bridging social psychology. Benefits of transdisciplinary approaches (pp. 427–33). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.Google Scholar

Tyler, T. R., and Degoey, P. (1996). Trust in organisational authorities: The influence of motive attributions on willingness to accept decisions. In Kramer, R. M. and Tyler, T. R. (eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 331–56). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Tyler, T. R., and Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In Zanna, M. P. (ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. XXV, pp. 115–91). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Tyszka, T. (1994). Cognitive representation of economics. Paper presented at the IAREP/SABE Annual Colloquium, Rotterdam.

Braak, H. (1983). Taxation and tax resistance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 3(2), 95–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Lange, P. A. M., Liebrand, W. B. G., Messick, D. M., and Wilke, H. A. M. (1992). Social dilemmas: The state of the art. In Liebrand, W. B. G., Messick, D. and Wilke, H. A. M. (eds.), Social dilemmas. Theoretical issues and research findings (pp. 3–28). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Varma, K. N., and Doob, A. N. (1998). Deterring economic crimes: The case of tax evasion. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 40(2), 165–84.Google Scholar

Vasin, A. A., and Navidi, K. (2003). Optimal tax inspection strategy. Computational Mathematics and Modeling, 14(2), 160–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vasina, P. A. (2003). Optimal tax enforcement with imperfect tax payers and inspectors. Computational Mathematics and Modeling, 14(3), 309–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Verheul, I., Uhlaner, L., and Thurik, R. (2005). Business accomplishments, gender and entrepreneurial self-image. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(4), 483–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vihanto, M. (2003). Tax evasion and the psychology of the social contract. Journal of Socio-Economics, 32(2), 111–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vogel, J. (1974). Taxation and public opinion in Sweden: An interpretation of recent survey data. National Tax Journal, 27(1), 499–513.Google Scholar

Wahlund, R. (1992). Tax changes and economic behavior: The case of tax evasion. Journal of Economic Psychology, 13(4), 657–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wallschutzky, I. G. (1984). Possible causes of tax evasion. Journal of Economic Psychology, 5(4), 371–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walster, E., Walster, G. W., and Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and research. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar

Wärneryd, K., and Walerud, B. (1982). Taxes and economic behaviour: Some interview data on tax evasion in Sweden. Journal of Economic Psychology, 2(3), 187–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wartick, M. (1994). Legislative justification and the perceived fairness of tax law changes: A reference cognitions theory approach. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 16(2), 106–23.Google Scholar

Wearing, A., and Headey, B. M. (1995). The would-be tax evader: A profile. Paper presented at the 1995 Compliance Research Conference, Canberra.Google Scholar

Webley, P. (1987). Audit probabilities and tax evasion in a business simulation. Economics Letters, 25(3), 267–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Webley, P.(2004). Tax compliance by businesses. In Sjögren, H. and Skogh, G. (eds.), New perspectives on economic crime (pp. 95–126). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Webley, P., Cole, M., and Eidjar, O.-P. (2001). The prediction of self-reported and hypothetical tax-evasion: Evidence from England, France and Norway. Journal of Economic Psychology, 22(2), 141–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar