1 - Ecosystem services: from concept to practice
from Part I - Introduction
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 February 2015
Summary
Introduction
Ecosystem services are hot, and they have been hot for a while. In 1998, Costanza et al. published their famous article about the societal value produced by ecosystems through ecosystem service delivery, an article which at the time this introduction was written had been cited more than 10 000 times. In 2005, the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) framed the need to protect biodiversity and the world’s ecosystems in terms of ecosystem services (MEA, 2005). In 2009, “The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity” (TEEB) followed up by presenting an approach to help decision-makers recognize, demonstrate, and capture the values of ecosystem services and biodiversity. And by now, most (inter)national policies in the field of nature conservation refer to ecosystem services when explaining the need for nature conservation, biodiversity protection, and sustainable resource use.
Despite the popularity of the concept of ecosystem services, policy-makers and practitioners are struggling to implement the concept in practice. An important reason for this science–policy divide is the lack of an interdisciplinary framework that guides policy-makers through the definition and measurement of ecosystem services to their valuation and the translation of these values into effective policy instruments and governance arrangements (see also Daily et al., 2009).
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Ecosystem ServicesFrom Concept to Practice, pp. 3 - 22Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
(2002). How New York City used an ecosystem services strategy carried out through an urban-rural partnership to preserve the pristine quality of its drinking water and save billions of dollars. Paper presented at Forest Trends, Tokyo. November 2002, p. 11.
and (2006). Poverty risks and national parks: policy issues in conservation and resettlement. World Development, 34(10): 1808–1830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2007). Equity implications of marketing ecosystem services in protected areas and rural communities: case studies from Meso-America. Global Environmental Change, 17(3–4): 365–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , et al. (1998). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Ecological Economics, 25(1): 315.Google Scholar
, , , et al. (2009). Ecosystem services in decision-making: time to deliver. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7(10): 21–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2012). Nature resilience: ecological restoration by partners in business for the next generations. Report, Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam.
and (2007). Poverty and biodiversity: measuring the overlap of human poverty and the biodiversity hotspots. Ecological Economics, 62: 93–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2009). Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision-making. Ecological Economics, 68: 643–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2013). Are ecosystem services replaceable by technology?Environmental and Resource Economics, 55: 513–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , et al. (2005). Global consequences of land use. Science, 309: 570–574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2006). Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change, 16(3): 253–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2011). Economic valuation and the commodification of ecosystem services. Progress in Physical Geography, 35(5): 613–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006). Where is the Wealth of Nations? Measuring Capital for the 21st Century. Washington DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
(2005). Economic Approach to Environmental and Natural Resources (3rd edition). Nashville, TN: South-Western Publishers.Google Scholar
(2005). Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
(2003). Weak vs. Strong Sustainability: Exploring the Limits of Two Opposing Paradigms. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
(2010). Ecosystem services: from eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder. Ecological Economics, 69: 1219–1227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and (2009). Enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem services by ecological restoration: a meta-analysis. Science, 325: 1121–1124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , et al. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461: 472–475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2009). The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity for national and international policy-makers. Available at: .
(2010). High-level meeting of the general assembly as a contribution to the international year of biodiversity, A/64/865, United Nations General Assembly, Geneva.
(2010). An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics, 69:1245–1252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.
- 5
- Cited by