References
Abrahamson, D. & Sánchez-García, R. (2016). Learning is moving in new ways: The ecological dynamics of mathematics education. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25 (2), 203–239.
Adams, F. & Aizawa, K. (2001). The bounds of cognition. Philosophical Psychology, 14 (1), 43–64.
Adams, F. & Aizawa, K. (2010). Defending the bounds of cognition. In Menary, R. (ed.), The Extended Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 67–80.
Aden, J. & Eschenauer, S. (2020). Translanguaging: An enactive-performative approach to language education. In Moore, E., Bradley, J., & Simpson, J. (eds.), Translanguaging as Transformation: The Collaborative Construction of New Linguistic Realities. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 102–117.
Aizawa, K. (2007). Understanding the embodiment of perception. The Journal of Philosophy, 104 (1), 5–25.
Akins, K. (1996). Of sensory systems and the “aboutness” of mental states. The Journal of Philosophy, 93 (7), 337–372.
Allen, M. & Friston, K. J. (2018). From cognitivism to autopoiesis: Towards a computational framework for the embodied mind. Synthese, 195 (6), 2459–2482.
Alsmith, A. J. T. & de Vignemont, F. (2012). Embodying the mind and representing the body. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 3 (1), 1–13.
Anderson, M. (2015). The Renaissance Extended Mind. London: Palgrave Macmillan. London
Anderson, M., Wheeler, M., & Sprevak, M. (2019). Distributed cognition and the humanities. In Anderson, M., Cairns, D., & Sprevak, M. (eds.), Distributed Cognition in Medieval and Renaissance Culture. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 1–17.
Anderson, M. L. (2010). Neural reuse: A fundamental organizational principle of the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33 (4), 245–266.
Andres, M., Seron, X., & Olivier, E. (2007). Contribution of hand motor circuits to counting. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19 (4), 563–576.
Astington, J. (1990). Narrative and the child’s theory of mind. In Britton, B. K. & Pellegrini, D. (eds.), Narrative Thought and Narrative Language. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 151–171.
Baillargeon, R., Scott, R. M., & Bian, L. (2016). Psychological reasoning in infancy. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 159–186.
Baron-Cohen, S. (1997). Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660.
Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.
Bechtel, W., & Huang, L. T. L. (2022). Philosophy of Neuroscience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Beer, R. (2000). Dynamical approaches to cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 91–99.
Berlucchi, G. & Aglioti, S. M. (2010). The body in the brain revisited. Experimental Brain Research, 200 (1), 25–35.
Berthoz, A. (2000). The Brain’s Sense of Movement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Block, N. (2005). Review of Alva Noe: Action in Perception. Journal of Philosophy, 102 (5), 259–272.
Bower, M. & Gallagher, S. (2013). Bodily affectivity: Prenoetic elements in enactive perception. Phenomenology and Mind, 2, 108–131.
Bredo, E. (1994). Reconstructing educational psychology: Situated cognition and Deweyan pragmatism. Educational Psychologist, 29, 23–35.
Brooks, R. (1991). Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence, 47, 139–159.
Bruineberg, J., Kiverstein, J., & Rietveld, E. (2018). The anticipating brain is not a scientist: The free-energy principle from an ecological-enactive perspective. Synthese, 195 (6), 2417–2444.
Burge, T. (2010). Origins of perception. Paper presented as the First 2010 Jean Nicod Prize Lecture, Paris, June 14, 2010.
Buttelmann, D., Carpenter, M. & Tomasello, M. (2009). Eighteen-month-old infants show false belief understanding in an active helping paradigm. Cognition, 112 (2), 337–342.
Caligiuri, M. P. & Ellwanger, J. (2000). Motor and cognitive aspects of motor retardation in depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 57 (1–3), 83–93.
Carruthers, P. (2013). Mindreading in infancy. Mind & Language, 28 (2), 141–172.
Casasanto, D. & Dijkstra, K. (2010). Motor action and emotional memory. Cognition, 115(1), 179–185.
Cash, M. (2013). Cognition without borders: “Third wave” socially distributed cognition and relational autonomy. Cognitive Systems Research, 25 –26, 61–71.
Cave, T. (2017). Situated cognition: The literary archive. Poetics Today, 38 (2), 235–253.
Chemero, A. (2001). Dynamical explanation and mental representations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5 (4), 141–142.
Chemero, A. (2009). Radical Embodied Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chen, S. & Bargh, J. A. (1999). Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavior predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 215–224.
Chiel, H. & Beer, R. (1997). The brain has a body: Adaptive behavior emerges from interactions of nervous system, body and environment. Trends in Neuroscience, 20, 553–557.
Chomsky, N. (1995). Language and nature. Mind, 104, 1–61.
Churchland, P. S., Ramachandran, V. S., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1994). A critique of pure vision. In Koch, C. & Davis, J. L. (eds.), Large-Scale Neuronal Theories of the Brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cisek, P. & Kalaska, J. F. (2010). Neural mechanisms for interacting with a world full of action choices. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 33, 269–298.
Clapin, H. (2002). The Philosophy of Mental Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clark, A. (1996). Economic reason: The interplay of individual learning and external structure. In Drobak, J. & Nye, J. (eds.), The Frontiers of the New Institutional Economics. Bingley: Emerald Group Academic Publishers, pp. 269–270.
Clark, A. (1997). Being There. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Clark, A. (1999). An embodied cognitive science? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3 (9), 345–351.
Clark, A. (2008a). Supersizing the Mind: Reflections on Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clark, A. (2008b). Pressing the flesh: A tension on the study of the embodied, embedded mind. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 76, 37–59.
Clark, A. (2010a). Memento’s revenge: The extended mind, extended. In Menary, R. (ed.), The Extended Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 43–66.
Clark, A. (2010b). Coupling, constitution, and the cognitive kind: A reply to Adams and Aizaway. In Menary, R. (ed.), The Extended Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 81–100.
Clark, A. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36 (3), 181–204.
Clark, A. (2015). Radical predictive processing. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 53 (S1), 3–27.
Clark, A. (2016). Surfing uncertainty: Prediction, Action, and the Embodied Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clark, A. (2018). A nice surprise? Predictive processing and the active pursuit of novelty. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 17 (3), 521–534.
Clark, A. & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58 (1), 7–19.
Clark, A. & Grush, R. (1999). Towards a cognitive robotics. Adaptive Behavior, 7 (1), 5–16.
Clark, A. & Toribio, J. (1994). Doing without representing? Synthese, 101 (3), 401–431.
Clowes, R. W. & Mendonca, D. (2016). Representation redux: Is there still a useful role for representation to play in the context of embodied, dynamicist and situated theories of mind? New Ideas in Psychology, 40, 26–47.
Colombetti, G. (2014). The Feeling Body: Affective Science Meets the Enactive Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Constant, A., Clark, A., & Friston, K. J. (2021). Representation wars: Enacting an armistice through active inference. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 3798.
Cosmelli, D. & Thompson, E. (2007). Embodiment or envatment? Reflections on the bodily basis of consciousness. In Stewart, J., Gapenne, O., & di Paolo, E. (eds.), Enaction: Towards a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 361–386.
Costa-Cordella, S., Reardon, E., & Parada, F. J. (2022). Towards a 4E perspective curricula for health and medical education. PsyArXiv, January 31, 2022. arXiv: http://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/p2nqm. Crane, T. (2008). Is perception a propositional attitude? The Philosophical Quarterly, 59 (236), 452–469.
Craver, C. F. (2007). Explaining the Brain: Mechanisms and the Mosaic Unity of Neuroscience. New York: Oxford University Press.
Craver, C. F. & Bechtel, W. (2007). Top-down causation without top-down causes. Biology and Philosophy, 22, 547–63.
Csibra, G. & Gergely, G. (2009). Natural pedagogy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 148–153.
Dale, R., Dietrich, E., & Chemero, A. (2009). Explanatory pluralism in cognitive science. Cognitive Science, 33 (5), 739–42.
Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: G. P. Putnam.
Danziger, S., Levav, J., & Avnaim-Pesso, L. (2011). Extraneous factors in judicial decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108 (17), 6889–6892.
Degenaar, J. & O’Regan, J. K. (2017). Sensorimotor theory and enactivism. Topoi, 36 (3), 393–407.
de Haan, S. (2020). Enactive Psychiatry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
De Jaegher, H. & Di Paolo, E. (2007). Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6, 485–507.
De Jaegher, H., Di Paolo, E., & Gallagher, S. (2010). Can social interaction constitute social cognition? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14 (10), 441–447.
Dennett, D. (1969). Content and Consciousness. London: Routledge.
Dewey, J. (1916). Essays in Experimental Logic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Di Paolo, E. A. (2005). Autopoiesis, adaptivity, teleology, agency. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4, 97–125.
Di Paolo, E. A., Rohde, M., & De Jaegher, H. (2007). Horizons for the enactive mind: Values, social interaction, and play. In Stewart, J., Gapenne, O., & Di Paolo, E. (eds.), Enaction: Towards a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 33–88.
Di Paolo, E., Thompson, E., & Beer, R. (2022). Laying down a forking path: Tensions between enaction and the free energy principle. Philosophy and the Mind Sciences, 3 (2), 1–39.
Dreyfus, H. L. (ed.) (1982). Husserl, Intentionality, and Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dumas, G., Kelso, J. A., & Nadel, J. (2014). Tackling the social cognition paradox through multi-scale approaches. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 882.
Dunn, J. (1991). Understanding others: Evidence from naturalistic studies of children. In Whiten, A., ed., Natural Theories of Mind: Evolution, Development and Simulation of Everyday Mindreading. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 51–61.
Egan, F. (2014). How to think about mental content. Philosophical Studies, 170, 115–135.
Feldman, C. F., Bruner, J., Renderer, B., & Spitzer, S. (1990). Narrative comprehension. In Britton, B. K. & Pellegrini, A. D. (eds.), Narrative Thought and Narrative Language. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 1–78.
Findlay, J. M. & Gilchrist, I. D. (2003) Active Vision: The Psychology of Looking and Seeing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fink, P. W., Foo, P. S., & Warren, W. H. (2009). Catching fly balls in virtual reality: A critical test of the outfielder problem. Journal of Vision, 9(13), 1–8.
Fiore, S. M., Salas, E., Cuevas, H. M., & Bowers, C. A. (2003). Distributed coordination space: Toward a theory of distributed team process and performance. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 4 (3–4), 340–364.
Fodor, J. A. (2008). LOT 2: The Language of Thought Revisited. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fogel, A. & Thelen, E. (1987). Development of early expressive and communicative action: Reinterpreting the evidence from a dynamic systems perspective. Developmental Psychology, 23(6), 747.
Friston, K. (2013). Life as we know it. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 10 (86), 20130475.
Friston, K. (2010). The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11 (2), 127–138.
Friston, K., Mattout, J., & Kilner, J. (2011). Action understanding and active inference. Biological Cybernetics, 104 (1–2), 137–160.
Fritzman, J. M. & Thornburg, K. (2016). “I is someone else”: Constituting the extended mind’s fourth wave, with Hegel. Essays in Philosophy, 17 (2), 156–190.
Fuchs, T. & Röhricht, F. (2017). Schizophrenia and intersubjectivity: An embodied and enactive approach to psychopathology and psychotherapy. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 24 (2), 127–142.
Gallagher, S. (2005a). How the Body Shapes the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gallagher, S. (2005b). Metzinger’s matrix: Living the virtual life with a real body. Psyche, 11 (5), 1–9.
Gallagher, S. (2013). The socially extended mind. Cognitive Systems Research, 25, 4–12.
Gallagher, S. (2017). Enactivist Interventions: Rethinking the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gallagher, S. (2020). Action and Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gallagher, S. (2021). Performance/Art: The Venetian Lectures. Milan: Mimesis International Edizioni.
Gallagher, S. (2023). The Self and Its Disorders. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gallagher, S. & Allen, M. (2018). Active inference, enactivism and the hermeneutics of social cognition. Synthese, 195 (6), 2627–2648.
Gallagher, S. & Gallagher, J. (2020). Acting oneself as another: An actor’s empathy for her character. Topoi, 39 (4), 779–790.
Gallagher, S. & Hutto, D. (2008). Understanding others through primary interaction and narrative practice. In Zlatev, J., Racine, T., Sinha, C., & Itkonen, E. (eds.), The Shared Mind: Perspectives on Intersubjectivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 17–38.
Gallagher, S., Hutto, D., Slaby, J. & Cole, J. (2013). The brain as part of an enactive system (commentary). Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36 (4), 421–422.
Gallagher, S. & Lindgren, R. (2015). Enactive metaphors: Learning through full-body engagement. Educational Psychology Review, 27 (3), 391–404.
Gallagher, S., Mastrogiorgio, A. & Petracca, E. (2019). Economic reasoning and interaction in socially extended market institutions. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1856. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01856. Gallagher, S., Varga, S., & Sparaci, L. (2022). Disruptions of the meshed architecture in Autism Spectrum Disorder. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 42 (1), 76–95.
Gallese, V. & Guerra, M. (2012). Embodying movies: Embodied simulation and film studies. Cinema: Journal of Philosophy and the Moving Image, 3, 183–210.
Gangopadhyay, N. & Kiverstein, J. (2009). Enactivism and the unity of perception and action. Topoi, 28, 63–73.
Garfield, J. L., Peterson, C.C., & Perry, T. (2001). Social cognition, language acquisition and the development of the theory of mind. Mind and Language, 16, 494–541.
Garfinkel, S., Minati, L., Gray, M. A. et al. (2014). Fear from the heart: Sensitivity to fear stimuli depends on individual heartbeats. The Journal of Neuroscience, 34 (19), 6573–6582.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. London: Psychology Press.
Glenberg, A. M. (2010). Embodiment as a unifying perspective for psychology. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1 (4), 586–596.
Glenberg, A. M. & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 558–565.
Goldman, A. I. (2012). A moderate approach to embodied cognitive science. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 3 (1), 71–88.
Goldman, A. I. (2014). The bodily formats approach to embodied cognition. In Kriegel, U. (ed.), Current Controversies in Philosophy of Mind. New York and London: Routledge, pp. 91–108.
Goldman, A. I. & Vignemont, de F. (2009). Is social cognition embodied? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13 (4), 154–159.
Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32 (10), 1489–1522.
Gopnik, A. & Meltzoff, A. N. (1997). Words, Thoughts and Theories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Guajardo, N. R. & Watson, A. (2002). Narrative discourse and theory of mind development. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 163, 305–325.
Hafed, Z. M. & Krauzlis, R. J. (2006) Ongoing eye movements constrain visual perception. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 1449–1457.
Halverson, C. A. (1995). Inside the cognitive workplace: New technology and air traffic control. (Doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego.)
Haugeland, J. (1991). Representational genera. In Ramsey, W., Rumelhart, D. E., & Stich, S. P., (eds.), Philosophy and Connectionist Theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 61–90.
Haugeland, J. (1995). Mind embodied and embedded. In Houng, Y.-H. & Ho, J.-C. ( eds.), Mind and Cognition. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
He, J. & Ravn, S. (2018). Sharing the dance: On the reciprocity of movement in the case of elite sports dancers. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 17 (1), 99–116.
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and Time, trans. J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson. New York: Harper and Row.
Helmholtz, H. (1962/1867). Treatise on Physiological Optics, 3rd ed., Vol. III, trans. J. Southall. New York: Dover.
Hobson, P. (2002). The Cradle of Thought. London: Macmillan.
Høffding, S. (2019). A Phenomenology of Musical Absorption. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hohwy, J. (2013). The Predictive Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hohwy, J. (2016). The self-evidencing brain. Nous, 50 (2), 259–285.
Hohwy, J., Roepstorff, A., & Friston, K. (2008). Predictive coding explains binocular rivalry: An epistemological review. Cognition, 108 (3), 687–701.
Hurley, S. (1998). Consciousness in Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hurley, S. (2010). The varieties of externalism. In Menary, R. (ed.), The Extended Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 101–153.
Husserl, E. (1989). Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy – Second Book: Studies in the Phenomenology of Constitution, trans. R. Rojcewicz & A. Schuwer. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Hutchins, E. (1995a). Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hutchins, E. (1995b). How a cockpit remembers its speeds. Cognitive Science, 19 (3), 265–288.
Hutto, D. D. (2005) Knowing what? Radical versus conservative enactivism. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4 (4), 389–405.
Hutto, D. D. (2007). The narrative practice hypothesis. In Hutto, D. D. ( ed.), Narrative and Understanding Persons, Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 43–68.
Hutto, D. D. (2015). Overly enactive imagination? Radically re‐imagining imagining. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 53, 68–89.
Hutto, D. D. & Abrahamson, D. (2022). Embodied, enactive education. In Macrine, S. L. & Fugate, J. (eds.), Movement Matters: How Embodied Cognition Informs Teaching and Learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 39–54.
Hutto, D. D. & Gallagher, S. (2017). Re-authoring narrative therapy: Improving our self-management tools. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 24 (2), 157–167.
Hutto, D. D., Kirchhoff, M. D., & Abrahamson, D. (2015). The enactive roots of STEM: Rethinking educational design in mathematics. Educational Psychology Review, 27 (3), 371–389.
Hutto, D. D., & Myin, E. (2013). Radicalizing Enactivism: Basic Minds without Content. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hutto, D. D. & Myin, E. (2020). Deflating deflationism about mental representation. In Smortchkova, J., Dołrega, K., & Schlicht, T. (eds.), What Are Mental Representations? Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 79–100.
Hutto, D. D. & Satne, G. (2015). The natural origins of content. Philosophia, 43 (3), 521–536.
Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jäger, N., Schnädelbach, H., & Hale, J. (2016). Embodied interactions with adaptive architecture. In Dalton, N., Schnädelbach, H., Wiberg, M., & Varoudis, T. (eds.), Architecture and Interaction. Cham: Springer, pp. 183–202.
Jelić, A., Tieri, G., De Matteis, F., Babiloni, F., & Vecchiato, G. (2016). The enactive approach to architectural experience: A neurophysiological perspective on embodiment, motivation, and affordances. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 481.
Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Johnson, M. (2015). The embodied meaning of architecture. In Robinson, S. & Pallasmaa, J. (eds.), Mind in Architecture: Neuroscience, Embodiment, and the Future of Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 33–50.
Johnson, M., & Lakoff, G. (2002). Why cognitive linguistics requires embodied realism. Cognitive Linguistics, 13 (3), 245–263.
Kelso, J. A. S. (2014). Coordination dynamics and cognition. In Davids, K., Hristovski, R., Araújo, D. D. et al. (eds.), Routledge Research in Sport and Exercise Science. Complex Systems Sport. London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis, pp. 18–43.
Kilner, J. M., Friston, K. J., & Frith, C. D. (2007). Predictive coding: An account of the mirror neuron system. Cognitive Processing, 8 (3), 159–166.
Kirchhoff, M. D. (2012). Extended cognition and fixed properties: Steps to a third-wave version of extended cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 11, 287–308.
Kirchhoff, M. D. (2017). From mutual manipulation to cognitive extension: Challenges and implications. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 16 (5), 863–878.
Kirchhoff, M. D. (2018). Autopoiesis, free energy, and the life–mind continuity thesis. Synthese, 195 (6), 2519–2540.
Kirchhoff, M. D. & Froese, T. (2017). Where there is life there is mind: In support of a strong life-mind continuity thesis. Entropy, 19 (4), 169.
Kirsh, D. & Maglio, P. (1994). On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action. Cognitive Science, 18 (4), 513–549.
Kiverstein, J. (2020). Free energy and the self: an ecological–enactive interpretation. Topoi, 39 (3), 559–574.
Kiverstein, J. & Rietveld, E. (2021). Scaling-up skilled intentionality to linguistic thought. Synthese, 198, 175–194.
Knuuttila, T. & Voutilainen, A. (2003). A parser as an epistemic artifact: A material view on models. Philosophy of Science, 70 (5), 1484–1495.
Koch, S. C., Caldwell, C., & Fuchs, T. (2013). On body memory and embodied therapy. Body, Movement and Dance in Psychotherapy, 8 (2), 82–94.
Krickel, B. (2018). Saving the mutual manipulability account of constitutive relevance. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 68, 58–67.
Krueger, J. (2014). Affordances and the musically extended mind. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1003.
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
Lakoff, G. & Núñez, R. (2000). Where Mathematics Comes From. New York: Basic Books.
Leong, V. & Schilbach, L. (2019). The promise of two-person neuroscience for developmental psychiatry: Using interaction-based sociometrics to identify disorders of social interaction. British Journal of Psychiatry, 215 (5), 636–638.
Lewes, G. H. (1879). The motor feelings and the muscular sense. In Lewes, G. H., Problems of Life and Mind. New York: Houghton, Mifflin and Company, pp. 312–328.
Lindgren, R. & Bolling, A. (2013). Assessing the learning effects of interactive body metaphors in a mixed reality science simulation. In Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA. Washington, DC: The American Educational Research Association, pp. 177–180.
Lindgren, R. & Moshell, J. M. (2011). Supporting children’s learning with body-based metaphors in a mixed reality environment. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, Ann Arbor, MI: ACM, pp. 177–180.
Malafouris, L. (2013). How Things Shape the Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Maturana, H. & Varela, F. (1980/1972). Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Meltzoff, A. N., Ramírez, R. R., Saby, J. N. et al. (2018). Infant brain responses to felt and observed touch of hands and feet: An MEG study. Developmental Science, 21 (5), e12651.
Menary, R. (2007). Cognitive Integration: Mind and Cognition Unbounded. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Menary, R. (ed.) (2010a). The Extended Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Menary, R. (2010b). Cognitive integration and the extended mind. In Menary, R. (ed.), The Extended Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 227–243.
Menary, R. (2010c). Introduction to the special issue on 4E cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 9 (4), 459–463.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2012). Phenomenology of Perception, trans. D. Landes. London: Routledge.
Merritt, M. (2015). Thinking-is-moving: Dance, agency, and a radically enactive mind. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 14 (1), 95–110.
Millikan, R. (1991). Perceptual content and Fregean myth. Mind, 100 (4), 439–459.
Millikan, R. G. (1995). Pushmi-pullyu representations. Philosophical Perspectives, 9, 185–200.
Miyazono, K. (2017). Does functionalism entail extended mind? Synthese, 194 (9), 3523–3541.
Murray, L. & Trevarthen, C. (1985). Emotional regulation of interactions between 2-month-olds and their mothers. In Field, T. M. & Fox, N. A. (eds.), Social Perception in Infants. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 177–197.
Natvik, E., Groven, K. S., Råheim, M., Gjengedal, E., & Gallagher, S. (2019). Space perception, movement, and insight: Attuning to the space of everyday life after major weight loss. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 35 (2), 101–108.
Nelson, K. (2003). Narrative and the emergence of a consciousness of self. In Fireman, G. D., McVay, T. E. J., & Flanagan, O. (eds.), Narrative and Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 17–36.
Nelson, K. (2007). Young Minds in Social Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Newen, A. , De Bruin, L. , & Gallagher, S. (eds.). (2018). Oxford Handbook of 4E-Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Noë, A. (2004). Action in Perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Øberg, G. K., Normann, B., & Gallagher, S. (2015). Embodied-enactive clinical reasoning in physical therapy. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 31 (4), 244–252.
Onishi, K. H. & Baillargeon, R. (2005). Do 15-month-old infants understand false beliefs? Science, 308 (5719), 255–258.
O’Regan, J. K. & Noë, A. (2001). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24 (5), 939–973.
Oullier, O. & Basso, F. (2010). Embodied economics: How bodily information shapes the social coordination dynamics of decision-making. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365 (1538), 291–301.
Palermos, S. O. (2014). Loops, constitution, and cognitive extension. Cognitive Systems Research, 27, 25–41.
Parr, T., Da Costa, L., & Friston, K. (2020). Markov blankets, information geometry and stochastic thermodynamics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 378 (2164), 20190159.
Peirce, C. S. (1887). Logical machines. American Journal of Psychology, 1 (1), 165–170.
Peirce, C. S. (1931–1935, 1958). Collected Papers of C. S. Peirce, eds. Hartshorne, C., Weiss, P., & Burks, A.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (abbreviated: CP followed by the conventional “[volume].[page]” notation).
Peirce, C. S. (1958). Collected Papers of C.S. Peirce. Vol 7. Ed. Burks, A. W.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Perner, J. (1992). Grasping the concept of representation: Its impact on 4-year-olds’ theory of mind and beyond. Human Development, 35 (3), 146–155.
Perry, M. (2003). Distributed cognition. In Carroll, J. (ed.), HCI Models, Theories, and Frameworks: Toward a Multidisciplinary Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 193–223.
Petracca, E. (2021). Embodying bounded rationality: From embodied bounded rationality to embodied rationality. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 710607.
Petracca, E. & Gallagher, S. (2020). Economic cognitive institutions. Journal of Institutional Economics, 16 (6), 747–765.
Prinz, J. (2009). Is consciousness embodied? In Robbins, P. & Aydede, M. (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 419–437.
Prinz, J. (2006). Putting the brakes on enactive perception. Psyche, 12, 1–19.
Proffitt, D. R. (2006). Embodied perception and the economy of action. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1 (2), 110–122.
Proffitt, D. R., Bhalla, M., Gossweiler, R., & Midgett, J. (1995). Perceiving geographical slant. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 409–428.
Pulvermüller, F. (2005). Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6 (7), 576–582.
Ramsey, W. (2007). Representation Reconsidered. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ramsey, W. (2020). Defending representation realism. In Smortchkova, J., Dołrega, K., & Schlicht, T. (eds.), What Are Mental Representations? Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 54–78.
Ramstead, M. J., Kirchhoff, M. D., Constant, A., & Friston, K. J. (2021). Multiscale integration: Beyond internalism and externalism. Synthese, 198 (1), 41–70.
Ravn, S. (2016). Embodying interaction in Argentinean tango and sports dance. In DeFrantz, T. & Rothfield, P. (eds.), Choreography and Corporeality: Relay in Motion. London: Palgrave Macmillan pp. 119–134.
Ravn, S. & Høffding, S. (2021). Improvisation and thinking in movement: An enactivist analysis of agency in artistic practices. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 21, 515–537. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-021-09756-9. Rietveld, E. & Brouwers, A. A. (2017). Optimal grip on affordances in architectural design practices: An ethnography. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 16 (3), 545–564.
Rietveld, E. & Kiverstein, J. (2014). A rich landscape of affordances. Ecological Psychology, 26 (4), 325–352.
Robbins, P. & Aydede, M. (2009). A short primer on situated cognition. In Robbins, P. & Aydede, M. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–16.
Rock, I. & Harris, C. S. (1967). Vision and touch. Scientific American, 216 (5), 96–104.
Röhricht, F., Gallagher, S., Geuter, U., & Hutto, D. D. (2014). Embodied cognition and body psychotherapy: The construction of new therapeutic environments. Sensoria: A Journal of Mind, Brain & Culture, 10 (1), n.p.
Roll, J-P. & Roll, R. (1988). From eye to foot: A proprioceptive chain involved in postural control. In Amblard, G., Berthoz, A., & Clarac, F. (eds.), Posture and Gait: Development, Adaptation, and Modulation. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica, pp. 155–164.
Rolla, G. & Novaes, F. (2022). Ecological-enactive scientific cognition: Modeling and material engagement. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 21 (3), 625–643 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-020-09713-y. Rowlands, M. (2006) Body Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rowlands, M. (2009). The extended mind. Zygon, 44 (3), 628–641.
Rowlands, M. (2010). The New Science of the Mind: From Extended Mind to Embodied Phenomenology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rubio-Fernández, P. & Geurts, B. (2013). How to pass the false-belief task before your fourth birthday. Psychological Science, 24 (1), 27–33.
Rupert, R. (2004). Challenges to the hypothesis of extended cognition. Journal of Philosophy 101, 389–428.
Rupert, R. (2011). Embodiment, consciousness, and the massively representational mind. Philosophical Topics, 39 (1), 99–120.
Saxe, R. & Kanwisher, N. (2003). People thinking about thinking people: The role of the temporo-parietal junction in “theory of mind.” Neuroimage, 19 (4), 1835–1842.
Schiavio, A. & Høffding, S. (2015). Playing together without communicating? A pre-reflective and enactive account of joint musical performance. Musicae Scientiae, 19 (4), 366–388.
Schwartenbeck, P., FitzGerald, T., Dolan, R. J., & Friston, K. (2013) Exploration, novelty, surprise, and free energy minimization. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 710. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00710. Shapiro, L. (2004). The Mind Incarnate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Shapiro, L. (2007). The embodied cognition research programme. Philosophy Compass, 2 (2), 338–346.
Shapiro, L. (2014). Book review: Radicalizing Enactivism: Basic Minds without Content. Mind, 123 (489), 213–220.
Shea, N. (2018). Representation in Cognitive Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Skulmowski, A. & Rey, G. D. (2018). Embodied learning: Introducing a taxonomy based on bodily engagement and task integration. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 3 (1), 1–10.
Smith, B. C. (1996). On the Origin of Objects. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Smortchkova, J., Dołrega, K., & Schlicht, T. (eds.) (2020). What Are Mental Representations? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Soto-Andrade, J. (2018). Enactive metaphorising in the learning of mathematics. In Kaiser, G., Forgasz, H., Graven, M. et al. (eds.), Invited Lectures from the 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education. Cham: Springer, pp. 619–637.
Sprevak, M. (2009). Extended cognition and functionalism. Journal of Philosophy, 106 (9), 503–527.
Stapleton, M. (2013). Steps to a “properly embodied” cognitive science. Cognitive Systems Research, 22–23, 1–11.
Sterelny, K. (2010). Minds: Extended or scaffolded? Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 9 (4), 465–481.
Sutton, J. (2010). Exograms and interdisciplinarity: History, the extended mind and the civilizing process. In Menary, R. ( ed.), The Extended Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 189–225.
Sutton, J. & Tribble, E. (2011). Cognitive ecology as a framework for Shakespearean studies. Shakespeare Studies, 39, 94–103.
Thompson, E. (2005). Sensorimotor subjectivity and the enactive approach to experience. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4 (4), 407–427.
Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology and the Sciences of Mind, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Thompson, E. & Varela, F. (2001). Radical embodiment: Neural dynamics and consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5 (10), 418–425.
Tognoli, E., Zhang, M., Fuchs, A., Beetle, C., & Kelso, J. A. S. (2020). Coordination dynamics: A foundation for understanding social behavior. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14, 317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00317. Trevarthen, C. (1979). Communication and cooperation in early infancy: A description of primary intersubjectivity. In Bullowa, M. (ed.), Before Speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 321–348.
Trevarthen, C. & Hubley, P. (1978). Secondary intersubjectivity: Confidence, confiding and acts of meaning in the first year. In Lock, A. (ed.), Action, Gesture and Symbol: The Emergence of Language. London: Academic Press, pp. 183–229.
Tribble, E. (2011). Cognition in the Globe: Attention and Memory in Shakespeare’s Theatre. Berlin: Springer.
Tsakiris, M. (2010). My body in the brain: A neurocognitive model of body-ownership. Neuropsychologia, 48 (3), 703–712.
Van Den Herik, J. C. (2018). Attentional actions: An ecological-enactive account of utterances of concrete words. Psychology of Language and Communication, 22 (1), 90–123.
Van Der Schyff, D., Schiavio, A., Walton, A., Velardo, V., & Chemero, A. (2018). Musical creativity and the embodied mind: Exploring the possibilities of 4E cognition and dynamical systems theory. Music & Science, 1, 1–18, https://doi.org/10.1177/2059204318792319. Varela, F. J. (1996). Neurophenomenology: A methodological remedy for the hard problem. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 3 (4), 330–349.
Varela, F. J. (1999) Present-time consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6 (2–3), 111–140.
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Varga, S. (2018). Interpersonal judgments, embodied reasoning, and juridical legitimacy. In Newen, A., de Bruin, L., & Gallagher, S. ( eds.), The Oxford Handbook of 4E Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 863–874.
Varga, S. & Heck, D. H. (2017). Rhythms of the body, rhythms of the brain: Respiration, neural oscillations, and embodied cognition. Consciousness and Cognition, 56, 77–90.
Wadham, J. (2016). Common-sense functionalism and the extended mind. Philosophical Quarterly, 66 (262), 136–151.
Ward, D., Silverman, D., & Villalobos, M. (2017). Introduction: The varieties of enactivism. Topoi, 36 (3), 365–375.
Wheeler, M. (2005). Reconstructing the Cognitive World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wheeler, M. (2012). Minds, things and materiality. In Schulkin, J. (ed.), Action, Perception and the Brain. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan, pp. 147–163.
Wheeler, M. (2018). Talking about more than heads: The embodied, embedded and extended creative mind. In Gaut, B. & Kieran, M. (eds.), Creativity and Philosophy. London: Routledge, pp. 230–250.
Wheeler, M. (2019). Breaking the waves: Beyond parity and complementarity in the arguments for extended cognition. In Colombo, M., Irvine, L., & Stapleton, M. (eds.), Andy Clark and Critics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 81–97.
Wheeler, M. & Clark, A. (2008) Culture, embodiment and genes: Unravelling the triple helix. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Series B, 363, 3563–3575.
Wiese, W. & Friston, K. (2021). Examining the continuity between life and mind: Is there a continuity between autopoietic intentionality and representationality? Philosophies, 6 (1), 1–18.
Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9 (4), 625–636.
Wimmer, H. & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13 (1), 103–128.
Woodward, J. (2003). Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Yarbus, A. (1967). Eye Movements and Vision. New York: Plenum Press.
Zahidi, K. & Myin, E. (2016). Radically enactive numerical cognition. In Etzelmuller, G. & Tewes, C. ( eds.), Embodiment in Evolution and Culture. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, pp. 57–71.
Zelano, C., Jiang, H., Zhou, G. et al. (2016). Nasal respiration entrains human limbic oscillations and modulates cognitive function. Journal of Neuroscience, 36 (49), 12448–12467.
Zhang, M., Kalies, W. D., Kelso, J. S., & Tognoli, E. (2020). Topological portraits of multiscale coordination dynamics. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 339, 108672.
Ziemke, T. (2001). Are robots embodied. Modeling Cognitive Development in Robotic Systems, 85, 701–746.
Zlatev, J. (2010). Phenomenology and cognitive linguistics. In Gallagher, S. & Schmicking, D. (eds.), Handbook of Phenomenology and Cognitive Science. Dordrecht: Springer, 415–443.
