Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-qc88w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-06T01:33:04.131Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - The Embodied Emotional Mind

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Gün R. Semin  and
Eliot R. Smith
By
Piotr Winkielman ,
Paula M. Niedenthal  and
Lindsay Oberman
Gün R. Semin
Affiliation:
Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Amsterdam
Eliot R. Smith
Affiliation:
Indiana University, Bloomington
Piotr Winkielman
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
Paula M. Niedenthal
Affiliation:
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) and University of Clermont-Ferrand
Lindsay Oberman
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
Get access

Summary

The environment is filled with emotionally significant information. On a walk in a forest, an individual might encounter a friendly dog or a disgruntled bear. In nearly every social interaction, an individual might be confronted with facial, vocal, and postural signs of emotion. Thus, spouses smile, colleagues frown, children pout, babies gurgle, and students tremble with anxiety or giggle with joy. Even computers deliver “just joking” faces by e-mail whereas stores and snacks lure with smiley faces. The importance of such information is now well documented: Emotionally charged objects can capture attention, bias perception, modify memory, and guide judgments and decisions (for an overview, see Eich, Kihlstrom, Bower, Forgas, & Niedenthal, 2000; Winkielman, Knutson, Paulus, & Trujillo, 2007).

Even abstract symbols that refer to emotional events, such as language, can rapidly shape an individual's behavior and trigger physiological responses. For example, most children learn through language rather than direct emotional experience that they should not put their fingers in electrical outlets or stand under a tree in a storm. Such information retains its heat in thought and language, and can be generalized to novel events (Olsson & Phelps, 2004). In adults, simple words like “the next tone will be followed by a shock” elicit a fear reaction (Phelps, O'Connor, Gateby, Grillon, Gore, & Davis, 2001) whereas terms of endearment trigger positive arousal (Harris, Ayçiçegi, & Gleason, 2003).

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Embodied Grounding
Social, Cognitive, Affective, and Neuroscientific Approaches
 , pp. 263 - 288
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adolphs, R. (2006). How do we know the minds of others? Domain-specificity, simulation, and inactive social cognition. Brain Research, 1079, 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adolphs, R., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., Cooper, G., & Damasio, A. (2000). A role for somatosensory cortices in the visual recognition of emotion as revealed by three-dimensional lesion mapping. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 2683–2690.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol system. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660.Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. W. (2003). Abstraction in perceptual symbol systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Biological Sciences, 358, 1177–1187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Batson, C. D. (1991). The altruism question: Toward a social-psychological answer. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Buccino, G., Binkofski, F., Fink, G. R., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., et al. (2001). Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in somatotopic manner: An fMRI study. European Journal of Neuroscience, 13, 400–404.Google ScholarPubMed
Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Martzke, J., & Tassinary, L. G. (1988). Specific forms of facial EMG response index emotions during an interview: From Darwin to the continuous flow model of affect-laden information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 592–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cacioppo, J. T., Priester, J. R., & Berntson, G. G. (1993). Rudimentary determinants of attitudes. II. Arm flexion and extension have differential effects on attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 5–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calder, A. J., Keane, J., Cole, J., Campbell, R., & Young, A. W. (2000). Facial expression recognition by people with Mobius syndrome. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 73–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cannon, W. B. (1927). The James-Lange theory of emotions. American Journal of Psychology, 39, 115–124.Google Scholar
Carr, L., Iacoboni, M., Dubeau, M. C., Mazziotta, J. C., & Lenzi, G. L. (2003). Neural mechanisms of empathy in humans: A relay from neural systems for imitation to limbic areas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 100, 5497–5502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Centerbar, D., & Clore, G. L. (2006). Do approach-avoidance actions create attitudes?Psychological Science, 17, 22–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 893–910.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, S., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavior predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 215–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, A. (1997). Being there: Putting brain body and world together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Craig, A. D. (2002). How do you feel? Interoception: The sense of the physiological condition of the body. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 655–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damasio, A. R. (1989). Time-locked multiregional retroactivation: A systems-level proposal for the neural substrates of recall and recognition. Cognition, 33, 25–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes' error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Grosset/Putnam.Google Scholar
Damasio, A. R., Grabowski, T. J., Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Ponto, L. L. B., Parvizi, J., Hichwa, R. D. (2000). Subcortical and cortical brain activity during the feeling of self-generated emotions. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 1049–1056.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dapretto, M., Davies, M. S., Pfeifer, J. H., Scott, A. A., Sigman, M., Bookheimer, S. Y., et al. (2005). Understanding emotions in others: Mirror neuron dysfunction in children with autism spectrum disorders. Nature neuroscience, 9(1), 28–30.Google ScholarPubMed
Decety, J., & Jackson, P. L. (2004). The functional architecture of human empathy. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 3, 71–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dimberg, U., Thunberg, M., & Elmehed, K. (2000). Unconscious facial reactions to emotional facial expressions. Psychological Science, 11, 86–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eich, E., Kihlstrom, J., Bower, G., Forgas, J., & Niedenthal, P. (2000). Cognition and Emotion. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. (1975). The language of thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J., & Pylyshyn, Z. (1988). Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis. Cognition, 28, 3–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forgas, J. P. (2002). Feeling and doing: The role of affect in social cognition and behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 9, 205–210.Google Scholar
Gallese, V. (2003). The roots of empathy: The shared manifold hypothesis and the neural basis of intersubjectivity. Psychopathology, 36, 71–180.Google ScholarPubMed
Gallese, V., Keysers, C., & Rizzolatti, G. (2004). A unifying view of the basis of social cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 396–402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glenberg, A. M., & Robinson, D. A. (2000). Symbol grounding and meaning: A comparison of high-dimensional and embodied theories of meaning. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 379–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, A. I., & Sripada, C. S. (2005). Simulationist models of face-based emotion recognition. Cognition, 94, 193–213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grush, R. (2004). The emulation theory of representation: Motor control, imagery, and perception. Behavioral Brain Sciences, 27, 377–96.Google ScholarPubMed
Harris, C. L., Ayçiçegi, A., & Gleason, J. B. (2003). Taboo and emotion words elicit greater autonomic reactivity in a first language than in a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 4, 561–578.Google Scholar
Hadjikhani, N., Joseph, R. M., Snyder, J., & Tager-Flusberg, H. (2006). Anatomical differences in the mirror neuron system and social cognition network in autism. Cerebral Cortex, 9, 1276–1282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, A., Brindley, R. M. & Frith, U. (2007). Imitation and action understanding in autistic spectrum disorders: How valid is the hypothesis of a deficit in the mirror neuron system?Neuropsychologia, 45, 1859–1868.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Havas, D. A., Glenberg, A. M., & Rinck, M. (in press). Emotion simulation during language comprehension. Psychonomic Society Bulletin and Review.Google Scholar
Heyes, C. M. (2001). Causes and consequences of imitation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 253–261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heyes, C. M., Bird, G., Johnson, H., & Haggard, P. (2005). Experience modulates automatic imitation. Cognitive Brain Research, 22, 233–240CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hutchison, W. D., Davis, K. D., Lozano, A. M., Tasker, R. R., & Dostrovsky, J. O. (1999). Pain related neurons in the human cingulate cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 403–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, W. (1896/1994). The physical basis of emotion. Psychological Review, 101, 205–210.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Larsen, J. T., Norris, C. J., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2003). Effects of positive affect and negative affect on electromyographic activity over zygomaticus major and corrugator supercilii. Psychophysiology, 40, 776–785.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lipps, T. (1907). Das Wissen von fremden Ichen. In Lipps, T. (Ed.), Psychologische Untersuchungen (Band 1) (pp. 694–722). Leipzig: Engelmann.Google Scholar
Markman, A. B., & Brendl, C. M. (2005). Constraining theories of embodied cognition. Psychological Science, 16, 6–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McIntosh, D. N., Reichmann-Decker, A., Winkielman, P., & Wilbarger, J. (2006). When mirroring fails: Deficits in spontaneous, but not controlled mimicry of emotional facial expressions in autism. Developmental Science, 9, 295–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondillon, L., Niedenthal, P. M., Winkielman, P., & Vermeulen, N. (under review). Embodiment of emotion concepts: Evidence from EMG measures.
Neumann, R., & Strack, F. (2000). “Mood contagion”: The automatic transfer of mood between persons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 211–223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newell, A. (1980). Physical symbol systems. Cognitive Science, 4, 135–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicotra, A., Critchley, H. D., Mathias, C. J., & Dolan, R. J. (2006). Emotional and autonomic consequences of spinal cord injury explored using functional brain imaging. Brain, 129, 718–728.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Niedenthal, P. M., Barsalou, L. W., Ric, F., & Krauth-Gruber, S. (2005). Embodiment in the acquisition and use of emotion knowledge. In Barrett, L. F., Niedenthal, P. M., & Winkielman, P. (Eds.), Emotion: Conscious and unconscious (pp. 21–50). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Niedenthal, P. M., Barsalou, L. W., Winkielman, P., Krauth-Gruber, S., & Ric, F. (2005). Embodiment in attitudes, social perception, and emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 184–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Niedenthal, P. M., Brauer, M., Halberstadt, J. B., & Innes-Ker, Å. (2001). When did her smile drop? Facial mimicry and the influences of emotional state on the detection of change in emotional expression. Cognition and Emotion, 15, 853–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niedenthal, P. M., Rohman, A., & Dalle, N. (2002). What is primed by emotion words and emotion concepts? In Musch, J. & Klauer, K. C. (Eds.) The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Nishitani, N., Avikainen, S., & Hari, R. (2004). Abnormal imitation-related cortical activation sequences in Asperger's syndrome. Annals of Neurology, 55, 558–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oberman, L. M., Hubbard, E. M., McCleery, J. P., Ramachandran, V. S., & Pineda, J. A. (2005). EEG evidence for mirror neuron dysfunction in autism. Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 190–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oberman, L. M., & Ramachandran, V. S. (2007). The simulating social mind: The role of simulation in the social and communicative deficits of autism spectrum disorders. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 310–327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oberman, L. M., Winkielman, P., & Ramachandran, V. S. (2007). Face to face: Blocking expression-specific muscles can selectively impair recognition of emotional faces. Social Neuroscience, 2, 167–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsson, A., & Phelps, E. A. (2004). Learned fear of “unseen” faces after Pavlovian, observational, and instructed fear. Psychological Science, 15, 822–828.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., & Barsalou, L. W. (2003). Verifying different-modality properties for concepts produces switching costs. Psychological Science, 14, 119–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phelps, E. A., O'Connor, K. J., Gateby, J. J., Grillon, C., Gore, J. C., & Davis, M. (2001). Activation of the amygdala by cognitive representations of fear. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 437–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prinz, J. J. (2002). Furnishing the mind: Concepts and their perceptual basis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Reed, C. L., & Farah, M. J. (1995). The psychological reality of the body schema: A test with normal participants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 334–343.Google ScholarPubMed
Reed, C. L., & McGoldrick, J. E. (2007). Action during body perception: Processing time affects self-other correspondences. Social Neuroscience, 2, 134–149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singer, T., Seymour, B., O'Doherty, J., Kaube, H., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2004). Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science, 303, 1157–1162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Solarz, A. K. (1960). Latency of instrumental responses as a function of compatibility with the meaning of eliciting verbal signs. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 239–245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Solomon, K. O., & Barsalou, L. W. (2004). Perceptual simulation in property verification. Memory & Cognition, 32, 244–259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spence, C., Nicholls, M. E., & Driver, J. (2001). The cost of expecting events in the wrong sensory modality. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 330–336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strack, F., Martin, L. L., & Stepper, S. (1988). Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: A nonobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 768–777.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strack, F., Schwarz, N., & Gschneidinger, E. (1985). Happiness and reminiscing: The role of time perspective, mood, and mode of thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1460–1469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tassinary, L. G., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2000). The skeletomuscular system: Surface electromyography. In Cacioppo, J. T., Tassinary, L. G., & Berntson, G. G. (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology, 2nd ed. (pp. 163–199). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Theoret, H., Halligan, E., Kobayashi, M., Fregni, F., Tager-Flusberg, H., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2005). Impaired motor facilitation during action observation in individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Current Biology, 15, R84–R85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (1998). On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 830–846.Google ScholarPubMed
Vermeulen, N., Niedenthal, P. M., & Luminet, O. (2007). Switching between sensory and affective systems incurs processing costs. Cognitive Science, 31, 183–192.Google ScholarPubMed
Villalobos, M. E., Mizuno, A., Dahl, B. C., Kemmotsu, N., & Muller, R. A. (2005). Reduced functional connectivity between V1 and inferior frontal cortex associated with visuomotor performance in autism. Neuroimage, 25, 916–925.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallbott, H. G. (1991). Recognition of emotion from facial expression via imitation? Some indirect evidence for an old theory. British Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 207–219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wells, G. L., & Petty, R. E. (1980). The effects of overt head movements on persuasion: Compatibility and incompatibility of responses. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1, 219–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wentura, D., & Rothermund, K.. (2000). Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of approach- and avoidance-related social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1024–1037.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, J. H. G., Whiten, A., & Singh, T. (2004). A systematic review of action imitation in autistic spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 34, 285–299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 625–636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wicker, B., Keysers, C., Plailly, J., Royet, J. P., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (2003). Both of us disgusted in My insula: the common neural basis of seeing and feeling disgust. Neuron, 40, 655–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winkielman, P., Berridge, K. C., & Wilbarger, J. L. (2005). Unconscious affective reactions to masked happy versus angry faces influence consumption behavior and judgments of value. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1, 121–135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winkielman, P., & Gogolushko, K. (under review). How does emotion influence motion? Pictures, but not words, elicit valence-congruent changes in hedonic behavior.
Winkielman, P., Knutson, B., Paulus, M. P. & Tujillo, J. T. (2007). Affective influence on decisions: Moving towards the core mechanisms. Review of General Psychology, 11, 179–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winkielman, P., Schwarz, N., Fazendeiro, T., & Reber, R. (2003). The hedonic marking of processing fluency: Implications for evaluative judgment. In Musch, J. & Klauer, K. C. (Eds.), The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 189–217). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zajonc, R. B., Adelmann, P. K., Murphy, S. T., & Niedenthal, P. M. (1987). Convergence in the physical appearance of spouses. Motivation and Emotion, 11, 335–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zajonc, R. B., & Markus, H. (1984). Affect and cognition: The hard interface. In Izard, C., Kagan, J., & Zajonc, R. B. (Eds.), Emotions, cognition and behavior (pp. 73–102). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. A. (2004). The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. In B. H. Ross (Ed.). The psychology of learning and motivation, 44, 35–62.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×