Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface
- 1 Introduction: emergency powers and constitutionalism in Asia
- PART I Perspectives from legal and political theory
- PART II Postcolonial and post-conflict transitions
- PART III Emergencies, executive power and constitutional order
- 10 Emergency powers and the rule of law in Indonesia
- 11 Emergency powers with a moustache: special powers, military rule and evolving constitutionalism in Thailand
- 12 Emergency powers and the limits of constitutionalism in Japan
- 13 States of exception in an exceptional state: emergency powers law in China
- PART IV The role of the courts
- Index
- References
13 - States of exception in an exceptional state: emergency powers law in China
from PART III - Emergencies, executive power and constitutional order
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 August 2010
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface
- 1 Introduction: emergency powers and constitutionalism in Asia
- PART I Perspectives from legal and political theory
- PART II Postcolonial and post-conflict transitions
- PART III Emergencies, executive power and constitutional order
- 10 Emergency powers and the rule of law in Indonesia
- 11 Emergency powers with a moustache: special powers, military rule and evolving constitutionalism in Thailand
- 12 Emergency powers and the limits of constitutionalism in Japan
- 13 States of exception in an exceptional state: emergency powers law in China
- PART IV The role of the courts
- Index
- References
Summary
The puzzle of emergency powers law in a ‘Chinese-style’ regime
Laws governing emergency powers are a puzzle in China and similar systems. Despite changes since the Reform Era began in the late 1970s, China remains an authoritarian regime without a robust rule of law, strong constitutional restraints on state power and reliable legal protections for citizens' rights. Laws authorising or defining extraordinary authority are not the significant and controversial matters that they often are elsewhere, especially in liberal constitutional democracies.
A regime of China's type (at least in pure form) operates in a permanent, but almost never declared, state of emergency. Laws conferring special powers seem superfluous. China does not have the aspirationally or episodically liberal, democratic, rule-of-law constitutional order that Albert Chen, Raul Pangalangan, H. P. Lee, Andrew Harding and other contributors to this volume describe as partly explaining frequent or lasting – if legally hard to justify – states of emergency in many Asian states. Even this dilute form of what David Dyzenhaus calls a ‘compulsion of legality’ would seem to have little purchase for PRC rulers.
Conversely, a regime of China's type cannot easily bind itself to the mast. Laws articulating preconditions for extraordinary powers or restricting their scope seem meaningless. In China's constitution and politics, courts do not play the vigorous role in policing such legal commitments that judiciaries are – or were – expected to perform in Western constitutional democracies, or the modestly constraining role that Arun K. Thiruvengadam envisions emerging in some Asian states in his chapter.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Emergency Powers in AsiaExploring the Limits of Legality, pp. 342 - 390Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2009
References
, ‘The Compulsion of Legality’, in (ed.), Emergencies and the Limits of Legality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), pp. 33–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Traps, Gaps and Law: Prospects and Challenges for China's Reforms’, in (ed.), Is China Trapped in Transition? Implications for Future Reforms (Oxford: Oxford Foundation for Law, Justice and Society, 2007), chap. 6, pp. 2–3Google Scholar
, ‘Chaos and Rules: Should Responses to Violent Crises Always Be Constitutional?’ (2003) 112 Yale Law Journal1011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Bird in a Cage: China's Post-Mao Legal Reforms (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
, China's Long March toward the Rule of Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
, ‘Legalization without Democratization in China under Hu Jintao’, in (ed.) China's Changing Political Landscape (Washington: Brookings, 2008), pp. 185–211Google Scholar
, ‘Perfect Emergency Response Legislation: Protecting Citizens’ Constitutional and Legal Rights' (2004) 6 China Judicature [Zhongguo Sifa], sect. 2.1Google Scholar
, , and (eds.), China's Search for Democracy(Armonk, N.Y.: M. E. Sharpe, 1992)
, and (eds.), Beijing Spring, 1989(Armonk, N.Y.: M. E. Sharpe, 1990)
, ‘Report on Checking the Turmoil and Quelling the Counterrevolutionary Rebellion’, Beijing Review, 17–23 July 1989Google Scholar
, ‘Recognize the Essence of Turmoil and the Necessity of Martial Law’, People's Daily, 3 June 1989Google Scholar
and , ‘Several Questions on Legislation for the Emergency Response Law’ (2007) 4 Administrative Law Review [Xingzheng Faxue Yanjiu]70Google Scholar
, ‘State of Emergency Legal Institutions’, People's Daily [Renmin Ribao], 28 February 2005Google Scholar
, ‘On Adjusting the Scope of Coverage and Limits to Decision-Making Authority in the Law on Martial Law,’ Journal of the Jilin Public Security Academy [Jilin Gongan Gaodeng Zhuanke Xuexiao Xuebao] (1999), No. 1Google Scholar
, ‘SARS and the Rule of Law in China’, in and (eds.), The SARS Epidemic: Challenges to China's Crisis Management (Singapore: World Scientific Press, 2004), pp. 99–113Google Scholar
, ‘SARS, Greater China, and the Pathologies of Globalization and Transition’ (2003) Orbis595Google Scholar
(ed.), SARS Period Exceptional Rule of Law [‘Feidian Shiqi de Feichang Fazhi’] (Beijing: Law Press 2003), pp. 24–7
, ‘Interpretation of the Emergency Response Law: Greatest Limitations Protecting Democracy and Freedom’, Outlook Weekly [Liaowang Xinwen Zhoukan], 17 April 2006Google Scholar
(ed.), Explanations of the PRC Emergency Response Law [Zhonghua Renmin Gongheguo Tufa Shijian Yingdui de Shiyi](Beijing: Law Press, 2007), pp. 2–3, 160–1
, ‘Economic Emergencies Also Should be Brought under Legal System’, Legal System Daily [Fazhi Ribao], 26 June 2008 (Yu An)Google Scholar
, ‘Yu An: Can the Earthquake Speed the Birth of China's State of Emergency Law?’, Legal System Daily [Fazhi Ribao], 27 May 2008Google Scholar
, ‘Martial Law Declared as Nearly 150 Die in Clashes in Central China’, New York Times, 1 November 2004Google Scholar
, ‘No End in Sight for Martial Law in Henan Riot Villages’, South China Morning Post, 4 November 2004Google Scholar
, ‘Martial Law in the Legal System of Exception: Proposal for Amending China's Law on Martial Law’, (2004) 20 Journal of Qingdao University of Science and Technology (Social Sciences Edition) [Qingdao Keji Daxue Xuebao (Shehui Kexue Ban)]89Google Scholar
, From Leninist Discipline to Socialist Legalism(Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
and , ‘The 2004 Amendment to China's Constitutional Law’ (30 June 2005) 6(2) Perspectives, sect. II.5Google Scholar
, ‘Martial Law Backfires in Beijing, but Many Chinese Demonstrators Fear a Phase-Two Crackdown’, Washington Post, 24 May 1989Google Scholar
, ‘Rights and Quarantine during the SARS Global Health Crisis’ (2007) 41 Law and Society Review525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Seven at Chinese Paper Held After Article on New SARS Case’, New York Times, 7 January 2004Google Scholar
, ‘Chasing the God of Wealth while Evading the Goddess of Democracy’, in and (eds.), Development and Democracy: New Perspectives on an Old Debate(Hanover, N.H.: University Press of New England, 2003), pp. 252–93Google Scholar
, and , Can Might Make Rights? Building the Rule of Law after Military Interventions (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 78–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The Rule of Law as a Concept in International Discourse’ (1997) 97 Columbia Law Review1 at 7–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Crises Cloud China's Olympic Mood as Quake Tests Party's Mantle’, Washington Post, 17 May 2008Google Scholar
, ‘US Easing Curbs as China Declares Martial Law Over’, New York Times, 11 January 1990Google Scholar
, ‘Using Law for a Righteous Purpose: The Sun Zhigang Incident’ (2006) 45 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law114Google Scholar
, ‘Military Officer Tied to Killings is Held by China’, New York Times, 12 December 2005Google Scholar
, ‘Shanghai's Middle Class Launches Quiet, Meticulous Revolt’, Washington Post, 26 January 2008Google Scholar
, ‘Land Disputes, Rights Assertion and Social Unrest in China’ (2005) 19 Columbia Journal of Asian Law235Google Scholar
, ‘Emergency Situations and Administrative Rule of Law’ (2004) 2 Legal Research [Faxue Yanjiu] sections 3, 4.7Google Scholar
and , ‘Suing the Local State: Administrative Litigation in Rural China’, in , and (eds.), Engaging the Law in China (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2005)Google Scholar
, China's Trapped Transition (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Why the Military Obeys the Party's Orders to Repress Popular Uprisings’ (2000) 46:6 Issues and Studies27Google Scholar
, ‘As Chaos Erupted in Tibet, the Police Fled’, International Herald Tribune, 25 March 2008Google Scholar
, ‘China Unleashed Guns and Tear Gas as Tibet Protests Turn Violent’, Daily Telegraph, 15 March 2008Google Scholar
, ‘Law and Terror: Singapore Stories and Malaysian Dilemmas’, in , and (eds.), Global Anti-Terrorism Law and Policy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), pp. 273–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and , ‘Troops Blocked in Beijing; Martial Law Declared in City’, Newsday, 20 May 1989Google Scholar
, ‘China Orders Martial Law, Deploys Troops in Tibet’, Los Angeles Times, 6 March 1989Google Scholar
, Burying Mao: Chinese Politics in the Age of Deng Xiaoping (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994)Google Scholar
, ‘Tiananmen and the Rule of Law’, in (ed.), The Broken Mirror: China After Tiananmen (London: Longman, 1991)Google Scholar
, ‘Regulation of Law Concerning Administrative Rights under a State of Emergency’, Chinese Constitution [Zhongguo Xianfa] (2002)Google Scholar
, ‘Conclusion: Comparative Reflections on Human Rights in Asia’, in , and (eds.), Human Rights in Asia (New York: Routledge, 2006), pp. 487, 502–5Google Scholar
, ‘Competing Conceptions of the Rule of Law in China’, in (ed.), Asian Discourses on the Rule of Law (New York: Routledge, 2004), pp. 113–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Hong Kong's New Constitutional Order, 2nd edn) (Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 1999), pp. 447–8Google Scholar
‘Scholar Calls for Caution on Making Press-Related Law’, Ta Kung Pao (Hong Kong), 27 July 2006
, ‘Disquiet Among Journalists over Chinese Draft Media Law’, South China Morning Post, 6 July 2006Google Scholar
, ‘Legislate to Safeguard the Public's Right to Know’, Ta Kung Pao (Hong Kong), 27 June 2003Google Scholar
, ‘State of Exception’, in (ed.), Traité International de Droit Constitutionnel (Paris: Presse Universitaire de France, 2009)Google Scholar
, ‘Lex Americana?: United States Legal Assistance, American Legal Models, and Legal Change in the Post-Communist World and Beyond’ (1999) 20 University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law179Google Scholar
, ‘Development without Democratization: China, Law and the East Asian Model’, in (ed.), Democratizations: Comparisons, Confrontations and Contrasts (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2008)Google Scholar
, Before the Next Attack: Preserving Civil Liberties in an Age of Terrorism (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2006)Google Scholar
, Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Theory of Sovereignty (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1988)Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.
- 3
- Cited by