Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T07:31:11.674Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Entries on Transitional Justice Institutions and Organizations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2023

Lavinia Stan
Affiliation:
St. Francis University, Nova Scotia
Nadya Nedelsky
Affiliation:
Macalester College, Minnesota
Get access

Summary

The Algerian government, headed by President Abdelaziz Bouteflika since 1999, created the Ad Hoc Inquiry Commission in Charge of the Question of Disappearances (Commission d’Enquête ad hoc chargée de la question des disparus) in September 2003. The aim of this six-person presidential commission chaired by lawyer Farouk Ksentini was to investigate disappearances during the armed conflict between the Algerian government, its allied civilian militias, and various Islamist insurgent organizations. From 1992 to 2002, a period known as the “dark” or “black” decade, thousands of Algerians were allegedly abducted by regime forces, pro-government militias, their Islamist opponents, and other armed groups with unclear political agendas (see entry on Algeria). The six members of the Ad Hoc Inquiry Commission, attached to the National Consultative Commission for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights (Commission Nationale Consultative de Promotion et de Protection des Droits de l’Homme, CNCPPDH), an institution housed under the Algerian presidency, worked for eighteen months, largely in secret. Its confidential report, delivered to President Bouteflika in March 2005, was never made public. The government eventually admitted responsibility for over 6,000 cases – half of all of the suspected disappearances from the civil conflict – and offered the families compensation in lieu of providing substantive details about the fate of their relatives or holding any officials accountable.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Collective of Families of the Disappeared in Algeria. 2016. Enforced Disappearances in Algeria: A Crime against Humanity. Algiers: Collectif des familles de disparu(e)s en Algérie.Google Scholar
Mara, T. O. ed. 2007. Devoir de mémoir / A Biography of Disappearance: Algeria 1992–. Photography by Omar, D. London: Autograph ABP.Google Scholar
Mundy, Jacob. 2015. Imaginative Geographies of Algerian Violence. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Afghanistan Government. 2005. Action Plan for Peace, Reconciliation, and Justice in Afghanistan. June. Available at: www.aihrc.org.af/media/files/Reports/Thematic%20reports/Action_Pln_Gov_Af.pdf, accessed on December 14, 2019.Google Scholar
Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission. 2005. A Call for Justice: A National Consultation on Past Human Rights Violations in Afghanistan. January 25. Available at: www.unhcr.org/refworld/docid/47fdfad50.html, accessed on December 14, 2019.Google Scholar
Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission. 2019. Annual Report. Available at: www.aihrc.org.af/home/annual_report/8255, accessed on December 14, 2019.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch. 2005. Blood Stained Hands: Past Atrocities in Kabul and Afghanistan’s Legacy of Impunity. Available at: www.hrw.org/en/reports/2005/07/06/blood-stained-hands, accessed on August 7, 2010.Google Scholar
Kouvo, Sari. 2009. Transitional Justice in the Context of Ongoing Conflict: The Case of Afghanistan. ICTJ Briefing. Available at: www.ictj.org/publication/transitional-justice-context-ongoing-conflict-case-afghanistan, accessed on December 14, 2019.Google Scholar
Law 3471 on the Structure, Duties and Mandate of the Afghan Independent Human Rights Commission. Available at: www.ilo.org/dyn/natlex/natlex4.detail?p_lang=en&p_isn=86567&p_count=102348&p_classification=01&p_classcount=13837, accessed on December 14, 2019.Google Scholar
Maley, William. 2009. Democracy and Legitimation: Challenges in the Reconstitution of Political Processes in Afghanistan, in Bowden, Brett, Charlesworth, Hilary, and Farrall, Jeremy (eds.), The Role of International Law in Rebuilding Societies after Conflict: Great Expectations. Cambridge University Press, pp. 111133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadery, Ahmad Nader. 2008. Peace or Justice? Transitional Justice in Afghanistan. August 8. Available at: www.boell.de/weltweit/asien/asien-4239.html, accessed on December 14, 2019.Google Scholar
Sajjad, Tazreena. 2009. These Spaces in Between: The Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission and Its Role in Transitional Justice. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 3(3): 424444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decision on the Implementation of the Assembly Decision on the Abuse of the Principle of Universal Jurisdiction. 2009. Doc. Assembly/AU/3 (XII) Assembly/AU/Dec.213(XII).Google Scholar
Heyns, C. and Stefiszyn, K., ed. 2006. Human Rights, Peace and Justice in Africa: A Reader. Pretoria: Pretoria University Press.Google Scholar
Juma, M., ed. 2006. Compendium of Key Documents Relating to Peace and Security in Africa. Pretoria: Pretoria University Press.Google Scholar
Wachira, G.M. 2008. Human Rights in Africa: 10 Years Since the Adoption of the Protocol to the African Charter Establishing the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights. London: Minority Rights Group International.Google Scholar
Copley, Amy and Sy, Amadou. 2015. Five Takeaways from the Bangui Forum for National Reconciliation in the Central African Republic. Brookings. May 15. Available at: www.brookings.edu/blog/africa-in-focus/2015/05/15/five-takeaways-from-the-bangui-forum-for-national-reconciliation-in-the-central-african-republic/, accessed on July 25, 2018.Google Scholar
International Crisis Group. 2017. Avoiding the Worst in Central African Republic. Africa Report 253. Nairobi/Brussels: International Crisis Group.Google Scholar
Marchal, Roland. 2016. Brève Histoire d’une Transition Singulière. La République Centrafricaine de janvier 2014 à mars 2016. Paris: Réseau des Organisations de la Société Civile de Centrafrique pour la Gouvernance et le Développement (ROSCA).Google Scholar
Mehler, Andreas. 2009. Reshaping Political Space? The Impact of the Armed Insurgency in the Central African Republic on Political Parties and Representation. German Institute of Global and Area Studies (GIGA) Working Paper 116. Hamburg: GIGA.Google Scholar
Brazilian Ministry of Women, Family and Human Rights. no date. Comissão de Anistia [Amnesty Commission]. Available at: www.mdh.gov.br/comissaodeanistia, accessed on August 17, 2019.Google Scholar
Mezarobba, Glenda. 2007. O preço do esquecimento: as reparações pagas às vítimas do regime militar (uma comparação entre Brasil, Argentina e Chile) [The Price of Omission: The Reparations Paid by the Government to the Victims of the Military Regime (A Comparative Study of Brazil, Argentina and Chile)]. PhD Dissertation. School of Philosophy, Letters and Human Sciences, University of São Paulo. Available at: http://tesis.museodelamemoria.cl/Tesis_PDF/tesis%20glendamezarobba.pdf, accessed on December 29, 2018.Google Scholar
Mezarobba, Glenda. 2016. Brazil: The Tortuous Path to Truth and Justice. In Transitional Justice in Latin America: The Uneven Road from Impunity towards Accountability Ed. Skaar, Elin, García-Godos, Jemima, and Collins, Cath. New York: Routledge, pp. 103125.Google Scholar
Bahrain: Shouting in the Dark. 2011. Documentary movie. Produced by Al-Jazeera.Google Scholar
Bassiouni, Mahmoud Cherif, Rodley, Nigel, Al-Awadhi, Badria, Kirsch, Philippe, and Arsanjani, Mahnoush H.. 2011. Report of the Bahrain Independent Commission of Inquiry. November 23. Available at: www.bici.org.bh/BICIreportEN.pdf, accessed on July 6, 2019.Google Scholar
Royal Order No. 28 of 2011. 2011. 29 June. Available at: www.bici.org.bh/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/RoyalOrder28of2011.pdf, accessed on July 6, 2011.Google Scholar
Aiken, Nevin T. 2015. The Bloody Sunday Inquiry: Transitional Justice and Postconflict Reconciliation in Northern Ireland. Journal of Human Rights, 14(1): 101123.Google Scholar
Hegarty, A. 2003. The Government of Memory: Public Inquiries and the Limits of Justice in Northern Ireland. Fordham International Law Journal, 26(1): 11481192.Google Scholar
Saville, M., Hoyt, W., and Toohey, J.. 2010. Report of the Bloody Sunday Inquiry. London: HSMO.Google Scholar
Widgery, J. P. 1972. Report of the Tribunal Appointed to Inquire into the Events on Sunday, 30 January 1972. London: HSMO.Google Scholar
Archdiocese of São Paulo, ed. 1998. Torture in Brazil: A Shocking Report on the Pervasive Use of Torture by Brazilian Military Governments, 1964–1979, Secretly Prepared by the Archdiocese of São Paulo. n.p.: Ilas Special Publication.Google Scholar
Arns, Dom Paulo Evaristo, ed. 1985. Brazil: Never Again [Brasil: Nunca Mais]. Petrópolis: Vozes.Google Scholar
Special Commission on the Dead and Disappeared for Political Reasons, ed. 2007. Direito à Memória e à Verdade [The Right to Memory and Truth]. Brasília: Special Human Rights Department of the Presidency. Available at: www.dhnet.org.br/dados/livros/a_pdf/livro_memoria1_direito_verdade.pdf, accessed on August 17, 2019.Google Scholar
Weschler, Lawrence, ed. 1990. A Miracle, a Universe: Settling Accounts with Torturers. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Center for the Documentation of the Consequences of Totalitarianism (Totalitārisma seku dokumentēšanas centrs). Official website. Available at: www.sab.gov.lv/?page=28&lang=lv&a=s&id=6, accessed on May 17, 2018.Google Scholar
KGB in the Baltic States. Documents and Researches. Online documentation. Available at: www.kgbdocuments.eu/, accessed on May 14, 2018.Google Scholar
Pettai, Eva-Clarita and Pettai, Vello. 2015. Transitional and Retrospective Justice in the Baltic States. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wezel, Katja. 2016. Geschichte als Politikum. Lettland und die Aufarbeitung nach der Diktatur. Berlin: Wissenschafts-Verlag.Google Scholar
Zake, Ieva. 2010. Politicians versus Intellectuals in the Lustration Debates in Transitional Latvia. Journal of Communist Studies and Transitional Politics, 26(3): 389412.Google Scholar
Rossi, Maria Laura. 1998. El desarrollo de la enseñanza social de los obispos del Paraguay. Un compromiso progresivo con la dignidad de la persona humana [The Development of Social Teaching of Paraguay’s Bishops. A Progressive Commitment with the Dignity of Human Kind]. Rome, Italy: Editrice Pontificia Universita Gregoriana.Google Scholar
Simon, Jose Luis. 1991. La dictadura de Stroessner y los derechos humanos [Stroessner’s Dictatorship and Human Rights]. Serie Nunca Mas. Vol. 1. Asunción, Paraguay: Comité de Iglesias.Google Scholar
Smith, Brian. 1979. Churches and Human Rights in Latin America: Recent Trends in the Subcontinent. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, 21(1): 89127.Google Scholar
Association for Free Speech Anna Politkovskaya. Official website. Available at: http://politkovskaya-bg.blogspot.com/2009/01/blog-post_9104.html, accessed on January 23, 2010.Google Scholar
Bulgaria’s Collaborators-Turned-Envoys Face Pressure. 2007. Novinite. July 30. Available at: www.novinite.com/view_news.php?id=83621, accessed on October 24, 2009.Google Scholar
Bulgarians Abroad Urged to Boycott Secret Agent-Turned-Minister. 2007. Novinite. July 30. Available at: www.novinite.com/view_news.php?id=106346, accessed on October 24, 2009.Google Scholar
Rally Calls for Pulling Out Bulgaria Collaborators-Turned-Envoys. 2007. Sofia Photo Agency. September 27. Available at: www.sofiaphotoagency.net/event.php?event_id=1975, accessed on October 24, 2009.Google Scholar
Bergsmo, Morten, Cheah, Wui Ling, and Ping, Yi, eds. 2014. Historical Origins of International Criminal Law. Vol. 1. Brussels: Torkel Opsahl.Google Scholar
Borch, Fred L. 2017. Military Trials of War Criminals in the Netherlands East Indies 1946–1949. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Georgina, McCormack, Tim, and Morris, Narelle, eds. 2016. Australia’s War Crimes Trials, 1945–51. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Kushner, Barack. 2015. Men to Devils, Devils to Men: Japanese War Crimes and Chinese Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals: Selected and Prepared by the United Nations War Crimes Commission. 1947–1949. 15 vols. London: His Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Linton, Suzannah. 2013. Hong Kong’s War Crimes Trials. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maga, Tim. 2001. Judgment at Tokyo: The Japanese War Crimes Trials. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
Piccigallo, Philip. 1979. The Japanese on Trial. Allied War Crimes Operations in the East, 1945–1951. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Reel, A. Frank. 1949. The Case of General Yamashita. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Totani, Yuma. 2015. Justice in Asia and the Pacific Region, 1945–1952: Allied War Crimes Prosecutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Angelov, Vesselin. 2008. Poveritelno! Komediata s dosietata (1989–2008) [Secret! The Files Comedy]. Sofia: no press.Google Scholar
Bertschi, Charles. 1995. Lustration and the Transition to Democracy: The Cases of Poland and Bulgaria. East European Quarterly, 28(4): 435451.Google Scholar
Tambuev, Georgi. 1991. Кompromat II [Discredit II]. Sofia: Trud.Google Scholar
Zakon za dostup do dokumentite na bivshata Darzhavna sigurnost [Law for Access to Documents of the Former State Security]. 1997. Darzhaven vestnik [State Gazette], no. 63. August 6.Google Scholar
Commission for Disclosing the Documents and Announcing Affiliation of Bulgarian Citizens to the State Security and the Intelligence Services of the Bulgarian National Army. Official website. Available at: www.comdos.bg/, accessed on September 7, 2019.Google Scholar
Komisia za razkrivane na dokumentite i za obyavyavane na prinadlezhnost na bulgarski grazhdani kum Darzhavna sigurnost i razuznavatelnite sluzhbi na Bulgarskata narodna armia [Commission for Revealing the Documents and Announcing State Security and Intelligence Services of the Bulgarian People’s Army Affiliation of Bulgarian Citizens]. 2008. Бюлетин [Bulletin], no. 1. April 5, 2007–February 29.Google Scholar
Zakon za dostap i razkrivane na dokumentite i za obyavyavane na prinadlezhnost na bulgarski grazhdani kam Darzhavna sigurnost i razuznavatelnite sluzhbi na Bulgrskata narodna armia [Law on Access and Disclosure of Documents and Announcing Affiliation of Bulgarian Citizens to the State Security and the Intelligence Services of the Bulgarian National Armed Services]. 2006. Darzhaven vestnik, no. 102. December 19. Available at: http://dv.parliament.bg/DVWeb/searchDV.faces, accessed on September 7, 2019.Google Scholar
Angelov, Veselin. 2007. Strogo secretno! Documenti za deinostta na Darzhavna sigurnost (1944–1989) [Top Secret! Documents for the Activity of State Security (1944–1989)]. Sofia: no press.Google Scholar
Angelov, Veselin. 2008. Poveritelno! Komediata s dosietata (1989–2008) [Secret! The Files Comedy (1989–2008)]. Sofia: no press.Google Scholar
Commission for Disclosing the Documents and Announcing Affiliation to the Former State Security and General Staff Intelligence Directorate. 2002. Da se zapazi za vechni vremena [To Be Preserved for Eternal Times]. Sofia: Commission for Disclosing the Documents and Announcing Affiliation to the Former State Security and General Staff Intelligence Directorate.Google Scholar
Zakon za dostup do dokumentite na bivshata Darzhavna sigurnost I bivsheto Razuznavatelno upravlenie na Generalnia Shtab [Access to the Former State Security and the General Staff Intelligence Directorate Files Act]. 2001. Darzhaven vestnik [State Gazette], no. 24. March 13.Google Scholar
Zakon za zashtita na klasificiranata informacia [Classified Information Protection Act]. 2002. Darzhaven vestnik [State Gazette], no. 45. April 30. Available at: www.damtn.government.bg/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/zakon-za-klasifitsiranata-informacia.pdf, accesed on August 3, 2022.Google Scholar
Bureau of the Government of Republika Srpska for Relations with the ICTY. 2002. Available at: www.slobodan-milosevic.org/documents/srebrenica.pdf, accessed on July 17, 2022.Google Scholar
Commission for Investigation of the Events in and around Srebrenica between 10 and 19 July 1995. 2004a. Addendum to the Report of 11 June 2004 on the Events in and around Srebrenica between 10 and 19 July 1995. October 15. Banja Luka: Republika Srpska Government.Google Scholar
Commission for Investigation of the Events in and around Srebrenica between 10 and 19 July 1995. 2004b. The Events in and around Srebrenica between 10 and 19 July 1995. Banja Luka: Republika Srpska Government.Google Scholar
Ferida Selimović et al. v. Republika Srpska, Decision on the Admissibility and the Merits, March 7, 2003.Google Scholar
Freeman, Mark. 2004. Bosnia and Herzegovina: Selected Developments in Transitional Justice. October. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. Available at: www.ictj.org/sites/default/files/ICTJ-FormerYugoslavia-Bosnia-Developments-2004-English.pdf, accessed on June 21, 2019.Google Scholar
Milanovic, Marko. 2006. Narratives of Justice for the Balkans: Establishing Responsibility for Genocide in the Bosnian War. Serbian Yearbook of International Law, 2: 237267.Google Scholar
Office of High Representative. 2004. Statement by the High Representative, Paddy Ashdown at Today’s Press Conference. December 16. Available at: www.ohr.int/?ohr_archive=statement-by-the-high-representative-paddy-ashdown-at-todays-press-conference, accessed on June 21, 2019.Google Scholar
Central Registry of Looted Cultural Property 1933–1945. Available at: www.lootedart.com, accessed on July 25, 2018.Google Scholar
Commission for Looted Art in Europe. Official website. Available at: www.lootedartcommission.com, accessed on July 25, 2018.Google Scholar
Müller, Melissa and Tatzkow, Monika. 2010. Lost Lives, Lost Art: Jewish Collectors, Nazi Art Theft, and the Quest for Justice. New York: Vendome Press.Google Scholar
Nicholas, Lynn H. 1994. The Rape of Europa: The Fate of Europe’s Treasures in the Third Reich and the Second World War. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
The Monuments Men. 2014. DVD. Directed by George Clooney. Los Angeles: Columbia Pictures.Google Scholar
Woman in Gold. 2015. DVD. Directed by Simon Curtis. London: BBC Films.Google Scholar
Burgess, Patrick. 2006. A New Approach to Restorative Justice – East Timor’s Community Reconciliation Process. In Transitional Justice in the Twenty-First Century: Beyond Truth vs Justice. Ed. Roht-Arriaza, Naomi and Mariezcurrena, Javier. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Commission for Reception, Truth, and Reconciliation of Timor-Leste (CAVR). 2005. Chega! The Report of the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in Timor-Leste (CAVR). Dili, East Timor: CAVR.Google Scholar
Lambourne, Wendy. 2010. Unfinished Business: The Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor. In Development of Institutions of Human Rights. Ed. Barria, Lilian A. and Roper, Steven D.. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
United Nations. 2006. Report of the Secretary-General on Justice and Reconciliation for Timor-Leste, S/2006/580, July 26, 2006. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
Commission for the Study and Evaluation of the Communist Totalitarian Regime in the Republic of Moldova. 2010. Analytical Report of the Commission for the Study and Evaluation of the Communist Totalitarian Regime in the Republic of Moldova, submitted to the Acting President Mihai Ghimpu. Available at: www.timpul.md/articol/exclusiv-citete-raportul-comisiei-pentru-studierea-regimului-comunist-12646.html, accessed on November 1, 2010.Google Scholar
Decree 165 of January 14, 2010 on the Creation of the Commission for the Study and Evaluation of the Communist Totalitarian Regime in the Republic of Moldova. Monitorul Oficial 5–7/3, January 19, 2010.Google Scholar
Pavlicenco, Vitalia. 2010. “Comisia Cojocaru,” “KGB-urile” si ocupatia sovietica [“The Cojocaru Commission,” the “KGBs,” and Soviet Occupation]. April 1. Available at: www.pavlicenco.md/2010/04/01/%E2%80%9Ecomisia-cojocaru%E2%80%9D-%E2%80%9Ekgb-urile%E2%80%9D-si-ocupatia-sovietica, accessed on December 7, 2010.Google Scholar
Voronin, Vladimir. 2010. Osnovnaia tsel’ “komissii Gimpu” – ustranit’ PKRM s politicheskogo polia [The Basic Aim of “Ghimpu’s Commission” Is to Eliminate the PCRM from Politics]. OMEGA news agency. January 19. Available at: http://omg.md/Content.aspx?id=6577&lang=3, accessed on December 7, 2010.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Kenneth. 1998. We Will Remember Them: Report of the Northern Ireland Victim’s Commissioner, Sir Kenneth Bloomfield KCB. Available at: https://cain.ulster.ac.uk/issues/violence/victims.htm, accessed on May 28, 2019.Google Scholar
Commission for Victims and Survivors Act (Northern Ireland) 2008. Available at: www.legislation.gov.uk/nia/2008/6/contents, accessed on May 28, 2019.Google Scholar
Nagle, John. 2009. Developments in Government Policy, 2005–2009. Available at: https://cain.ulster.ac.uk/victims/policy/jn09policy.html, accessed on May 28, 2019.Google Scholar
Northern Ireland Office. 2005. Services for Victims and Survivors: Consultation on Next Phase of Policy in Relation to Services for Victims and Survivors of the Troubles in Northern Ireland and on the Establishment of a Commissioner for Victims and Survivors, Annex A. Available at: https://cain.ulster.ac.uk/issues/victims/docs/victimsunit010305.pdf, accessed on May 28, 2019.Google Scholar
Office of the First Minister and Deputy First Minister. 2002. Reshape, Rebuild, Achieve: Delivering Practice Help and Services to Victims of the Conflict in Northern Ireland. Available at: https://cain.ulster.ac.uk/issues/victims/docs/vu02.pdf, accessed on May 28, 2019.Google Scholar
Victims and Survivors (Northern Ireland) Order 2006. Available at: www.legislation.gov.uk/nisi/2006/2953/contents, accessed on May 28, 2019.Google Scholar
Amnesty International. 2003. Côte d’Ivoire: une série de crimes impunis. Du massacre des gendarmes à Bouaké aux charniers de Daloa, de Monoko-Zohi et de Man. Available at: www.amnesty.org/download/Documents/100000/afr310072003fr.pdf, accessed on June 13, 2019.Google Scholar
Commission of Dialogue, Truth, and Reconciliation. 2014. Rapport Final. December. Available at: www.gouv.ci/doc/presse/1477497207RAPPORT%20FINAL_CDVR.pdf, accessed on March 13, 2017.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch. 2015. To Consolidate This Peace of Ours: A Human Rights Agenda for Côte d’Ivoire. Available at: www.hrw.org/report/2015/12/08/consolidate-peace-ours/human-rights-agenda-cote-divoire, accessed on June 13, 2019.Google Scholar
N’Goran, Emmanuel Niamien. 2014. Reconciliation, Justice and Economic Growth in Côte d’Ivoire. Géoéconomie, 69: 99108.Google Scholar
Portail officiel du gouvernement de Côte d’Ivoire. 2018. Indemnisation des victimes des crises survenues en Côte d’Ivoire: 20 millions FCFA remis à 46 personnes à Gagnoa. July 2. Available at: www.gouv.ci/_actualite-article.php?d=3&recordID=9003&p=38, accessed on June 13, 2019.Google Scholar
Bassiouni, M. Cherif. 1994. The United Nations Commission of Experts Established Pursuant to Security Council Resolution 780 (1992). The American Journal of International Law, 88(4): 784805.Google Scholar
Bassiouni, M. Cherif. 2017. Investigating War Crimes in the Former Yugoslavia War 1992–1994: The United Nations Commission of Experts Established Pursuant to Security Council Resolution 780 (1992). Cambridge: Intersentia.Google Scholar
Bassiouni, M. Cherif, O’Brien, James C., Corell, Hans, Szasz, Paul C., and Rubin, Alfred P.. 1993. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law), 87 (March 31–April 3): 2036.Google Scholar
UN Security Council. 1994. Report of the Commission of Experts Established Pursuant to United Nations Security Council Resolution 780 (1992). May 27. S/1994/674. Available at: www.refworld.org/docid/582060704.html, accessed on August 31, 2019.Google Scholar
Amnesty International. 2016. Timor-Leste Still No Justice for Past Human Rights Violations. November. Available at: www.laohamutuk.org/Justice/UPR/2016/AITLUIPR.pdf, accessed on May 15, 2018.Google Scholar
Commission of Human Rights Abuse in Timor. 2000. Executive Summary Report on the Investigation of Human Rights Violations in East Timor. Available at: www.etan.org/news/2000a/3exec.htm, accessed on May 15, 2018.Google Scholar
Commission of Truth and Friendship Indonesia – Timor-Leste. No date. Final Report (Laporan Akhir Komisi Kebenaran Dan Persahabatan, KKP). Available at: www.chegareport.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/CTF-laporan-akhir-20081.pdf, accessed on May 15, 2018.Google Scholar
Daly, Erin and Sarkin-Hughes, Jeremy. 2007. Reconciliation in Divided Societies: Finding Common Ground. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
International Bar Association. No date. The Special Panels for Serious Crimes (SPSC) in East Timor. Available at: www.ibanet.org/Committees/WCC_EastTimor.aspx, accessed on May 15, 2018.Google Scholar
Soesastro, Hadi and Smith, Anthony. 2003. Governance in Indonesia: Challenges Facing the Megawati Presidency. Singapore: ISEAS.Google Scholar
United Nations Security Council. 2004. Resolution 1543. May 14. Available at: www.worldlii.org/int/other/UNSCRsn/2004/22.pdf, accessed on May 15, 2018.Google Scholar
Wah, Chin Kin and Singh, Daljit. 2005. Southeast Asian Affairs. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Beattie, Andrew. 2008. Playing Politics with History: The Bundestag Inquiries into East Germany. New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Beattie, Andrew. 2009. An Evolutionary Process: Contributions of the Bundestag Inquiries into East Germany to an Understanding of the Role of Truth Commissions. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 4(1): 121.Google Scholar
Betts, Paul. 2005. Germany, International Justice and the Twentieth Century. History and Memory, 17(1): 4586.Google Scholar
Deutscher Bundestag, ed. 1995. Materialien der Enquete-Kommission Aufarbeitung von Geschichte und Folgen der SED-Diktatur in Deutschland, IX vols. Frankfurt am Main: Nomos.Google Scholar
Ismayr, Wolfgang. 1996. Enquete-Kommissionen des Deutschen Bundestages. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 27: 2941.Google Scholar
McAdams, James. 2001. Judging the Past in Unified Germany. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reitz, Ulrich. 1992. Verlockung, Anpassung, Repression. Die Welt. February 12.Google Scholar
Wüstenberg, Ralf. 2004. Die politische Dimension der Versöhnung. Eine theologische Studie zum Umgang mit Schuld nach den Systemumbrüchen in Südafrika und Deutschland. Gütersloh: Kaiser.Google Scholar
Commission of Inquiry into Certain Allegations of Cruelty and Human Rights Abuse against ANC Prisoners and Detainees by ANC Members (“the Motsuenyane Commission”). 1993. Report. August 20.Google Scholar
Ellis, Stephen. 1994. Mbokodo: Security in ANC Camps, 1961–1990. African Affairs, 93(371): 279298.Google Scholar
Hayner, Priscilla B. 1994. Fifteen Truth Commissions – 1974 to 1994: A Comparative Study. Human Rights Quarterly, 16: 597655.Google Scholar
Ellis, Stephen. 1994. Mbokodo: Security in ANC Camps, 1961–1990. African Affairs, 93(371): 279298.Google Scholar
Skweyiya Commission Report. 1992. South African History Online. October 19. Available at www.sahistory.org.za/archive/skweyiya-commission-report-released-19-october-1992, accessed on December 4, 2018.Google Scholar
Carver, Richard. 1990. Called to Account: How African Governments Investigate Human Rights Violations. African Affairs, 89.356: 391415.Google Scholar
The Republic of Uganda. 1975. Report of the Commission of Inquiry into Disappearances of People in Uganda since the 25th of January 1971 from 1st July, 1974 to 2nd January, 1975. Kampala: UPPC.Google Scholar
Commission of Inquiry into Post-Election Violence. 2008. Report of the Commission of Inquiry into Post-Election Violence. October 15. Available at: www.communication.go.ke/media.asp?id=739, accessed on October 11, 2011.Google Scholar
Kenya Gazette 2008. Special Issue, Government Printer, May 23.Google Scholar
Quinn, Joanna R. 2004. Constraints: The Un-Doing of the Ugandan Truth Commission. Human Rights Quarterly, 26(2): 401427.Google Scholar
Quinn, Joanna R. 2010. The Politics of Acknowledgement. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
The Republic of Uganda. 1994. The Report of the Commission of Inquiry into Violations of Human Rights. Kampala: UPPC.Google Scholar
Commission of Inquiry on Lessons Learned and Reconciliation. 2011. Report. November. Available at: http://slembassyusa.org/downloads/LLRC-REPORT.pdf, accessed on July 21, 2019.Google Scholar
Dominguez, Gabriel. 2014. Doubts over Sri Lanka’s Reconciliation Efforts, Deutsche Welle. February 26. Available at: www.dw.de/doubts-over-sri-lankas-reconciliation-efforts/a-17455166, accessed on July 22, 2019.Google Scholar
Pinto-Jayawardena, Kishali. 2010. Post-War Justice in Sri Lanka. Rule of Law, the Criminal Justice System and Commissions of Inquiry. January. Available at: https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/04234216454178AFC12576B20038FF61-Full_Report.pdf, accessed on July 21, 2019.Google Scholar
Proclamations & c. by the President. 2010. The Gazette of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka. June 16. Available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20111004025059/http://www.documents.gov.lk/Extgzt/2010/PDF/Jun/1658_19/1658_19%20%28E%29.pdf, accessed on July 21, 2019.Google Scholar
Uppsala Conflict Data Program. no date. Sri Lanka. Available at: https://ucdp.uu.se/, accessed on July 19, 2022.Google Scholar
International Center for Transitional Justice and Advocacy Forum. 2008. Nepali Voices: Victims’ Perceptions of Truth, Justice, Reconciliation, Reparations and the Transition in Nepal.Google Scholar
Pudasaini, Navaraj. 2008. In Memory of Disappeared. Kathmandu Post. September 7.Google Scholar
United States Institute of Peace. no date. Truth Commissions Digital Collection, Commission of Inquiry: Nepal 90. Available at: www.usip.org/resources/commission-inquiry-nepal-90, accessed on July 7, 2010.Google Scholar
Commission of Historians of Latvia / Latvijas vēsturnieku komisija. Official website. Available at: www.president.lv/lv/darbibas-jomas/komisijas-un-padomes/vesturnieku-komisija, accessed on May 18, 2018.Google Scholar
Mälksoo, Maria, 2007. The First Lady of the Baltic “Memory Offence.” Diplomaatia, 47: 47.Google Scholar
Nollendorfs, Valters and Oberländer, Erwin, eds. 2005. The Hidden and Forbidden History of Latvia. Vol. 14. Riga: Institute of the History of Latvia. Symposium of the Commission of the Historians of Latvia.Google Scholar
Pettai, Eva-Clarita, 2011. The Convergence of Two Worlds: Historians and Emerging Histories in the Baltic States. In Forgotten Pages in Baltic History. Themes of Diversity and Inclusion. Ed. Housden, Martyn and Smith, David J. (Amsterdam: Rodopi), pp. 263280.Google Scholar
Pettai, Eva-Clarita. 2015. Negotiating History for Reconciliation: A Comparative Evaluation of Baltic Presidential Commissions. Europe-Asia Studies, 67(7): 10791101.Google Scholar
Vēsturnieku Komisijas Nolikums, Riga. 2015. 18 August. Available at: www.president.lv/storage/items/PDF/20150924Vesturnieku%20komisijas%20nolikums.pdf, accessed on May 28, 2018.Google Scholar
Decree-Law 110/1978. 1978. Cria, junto da Presidência do Conselho de Ministros, na dependência do Primeiro-Ministro ou do membro do Governo em quem delegar, a Comissão do Livro Negro Sobre o Regime Fascista. DR 120/78, Series I, May 26.Google Scholar
Diário da Assembleia da República. 1978. Series I, No. 77. May 24, pp. 2777–2799. Available at: http://debates.parlamento.pt/, accessed on July 13, 2016.Google Scholar
Diário de Notícias. 1977. Esclarecer opinião pública das violências praticadas. April 23, p. 3.Google Scholar
Morais, Joana Rebelo. 2016. Comissão do Livro Negro Sobre o Regime Fascista: Em busca da verdade? Masters Dissertation. Department of Political Science and Public Policy. ISCTE-IUL, Lisbon.Google Scholar
Pinto, António Costa and Raimundo, Filipa. 2016. Violence, Repression and Terror in Mass Dictatorships: A View from the European Margins. In The Palgrave Handbook of Mass Dictatorships. Ed. Lim, Jie-Hjun and Corner, Paul. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 105117.Google Scholar
Raimundo, Filipa (2015). Strategic Silence as a Third Way. Political Parties and Transitional Justice. Democratization, 22(6): 10541073.Google Scholar
Civil Liberties Act of 1988. Available at: http://www.civics-online.org/library/formatted/texts/civilact1988.html (accessed January 20, 2010).Google Scholar
Commission on Wartime Relocation and Internment of Civilians. 1983. Personal Justice Denied. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Daniels, Roger. 2004. Prisoners without Trial: Japanese Americans in World War II. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Daniels, Roger, Taylor, Sandra C., and Kitano, Harry, eds. 2001. Japanese Americans, From Relocation to Redress. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Korematsu v. United States, 323 U.S. 214, (1944) United States Supreme Court case on the constitutionality of Executive Order 9066. Available at: http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0323_0214_ZO.html. (accessed January 19, 2010).Google Scholar
Comisión para el Esclarecimiento Histórico (Guatemala). 1999. Guatemala, Memory of Silence: Report of the Commission for Historical Clarification. Guatemala City: Comisión para el Esclarecimiento Histórico.Google Scholar
Seils, Paul. 2002. Reconciliation in Guatemala: The Role of Intelligent Justice. Race and Class, 44: 3359.Google Scholar
Tomuschat, Christian. 2001. Clarification Commission in Guatemala. Human Rights Quarterly, 23: 233258.Google Scholar
Dobrokhotov, R. 2012. Kreml’ prekratil bor’bu s fal’sifikatsiiami [The Kremlin’s Done with the Falsification of History]. Slon. March 21. Available at: https://republic.ru/russia/kreml_prekratil_borbu_s_falsitsikatsiyami-767128.xhtml, accessed on February 22, 2018.Google Scholar
Polubota, A. 2012. S fal’sifikatsiei istorii pokoncheno [An End to the Falsification of History]. Svobodnaia Pressa. March 21. Available at: http://svpressa.ru/society/article/53717, accessed on February 22, 2018.Google Scholar
Report of the Head of the Russian State Archival Agency at the Commission’s Third Session. September 9, 2010. Official website. Available at: http://archives.ru/press/comission_history_artizov_070910.shtml, accessed on November 6, 2010.Google Scholar
Samarina, A. and Tsvetkova, R., 2009. Imena, paroli, iavki … : Akademiia nauk sostavliaet spiski fal’sifikatorov istorii [Names, Passwords, Secret Meeting Places … : The Academy of Sciences Compiles Lists of Falsifiers of History]. Nezavisimaia gazeta. July 3. Available at www.ng.ru/politics/2009-07-03/1_names.html, accessed on February 22, 2018.Google Scholar
Attwood, B. 2000. The Burden of the Past in the Present. In Essays on Australian Reconciliation. Ed. Grattan, Michelle. Melbourne: Bookman Press, pp. 254259.Google Scholar
Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation. 1992. Triennial Plan. Available at: www.austlii.edu.au/au/other/IndigLRes/car/1992/1/5.html, accessed on February 5, 2020.Google Scholar
Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation. 2000. Reconciliation: Australia’s Challenge, Final Report to Parliament. Available at: www.austlii.edu.au/au/other/IndigLRes/car/2000/16/, accessed on February 5, 2020.Google Scholar
Howard, J. 1988. Treaty Is a Recipe for Separatism. In A Treaty with the Aborigines? Ed. Baker, K.. Melbourne: Institute of Public Affairs, p. 6.Google Scholar
Newspoll Market Research. 2000. Quantitative Research into Issues Relating to a Document of Reconciliation. Available at: www.austlii.edu.au/au/other/IndigLRes/car/2000/3/, accessed on February 5, 2020.Google Scholar
Scott, E. 2000. Reconciliation Council Chair: On Track to Finish Business. Sydney Morning Herald, May 4.Google Scholar
Short, D. 2003. Reconciliation, Assimilation and the Indigenous Peoples of Australia. International Political Science Review, 24(4): 491513.Google Scholar
Short, D. 2008. Reconciliation and Colonial Power: Indigenous Rights in Australia. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Tickner, R. 2001. Taking a Stand: Land Rights to Reconciliation. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Borch, Fred. L. 2017. Military Trials of War Criminals in the Netherlands East Indies 1946–1949. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bouwknegt, Thijs B. 2018. Eshetu Alemu: “The Black Sheep of the Dergue” – Ethiopian War Crimes and Universal Jurisdiction in the Netherlands. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 12(3): 549559.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch. 2014. The Long Arm of Justice: Lessons from Specialized War Crimes Units in France, Germany, and the Netherlands. New York: Human Rights Watch.Google Scholar
Romijn, Peter and Schumacher, Erik. 2014. Transitional Justice in the Netherlands after World War Two. In Transitional Justice and Memory in Europe (1945–2013). Ed. Wouters, Nico. Cambridge: Intersentia, pp. 133171.Google Scholar
Ammar, Alain. 2005. Qui a tué Salvador Allende? [Who Killed Salvador Allende?] In Cuba Nostra: Les secrets d’état de Fidel Castro [Cuba Nostra: Fidel Castro’s State Secrets]. Paris: Editions Plon.Google Scholar
Amnesty International. 1997. CUBA: The Sinking of the “13 de Marzo” Tugboat on 13 July 1994. AMR 25/013/1997. June 30. Available at: www.amnesty.org/download/Documents/156000/amr250131997en.pdf, accessed on April 9, 2018.Google Scholar
Bryant, Anthony. 1984. Hijack. Fort Lauderdale: Freedom Press International.Google Scholar
Castro Ruz, Fidel. 2001. Speech Given at the Plenary Session of the 105th Conference of the Inter-Parliamentary Union, Havana. April 5. Available at: www.cuba.cu/gobierno/discursos/2001/ing/f050401i.html, accessed on April 2, 2018.Google Scholar
Castro’s Tropical Gulag: The Tribunal on Cuba: Paris, April, 1986. New York: American Foundation for Resistance International, 1986.Google Scholar
Cuba Archive. Official website. Available at: www.cubaarchive.org, accessed on February 22, 2018.Google Scholar
Koppel, Ted. 1998. Crossing the Divide. DVD. Nightline. January 20.Google Scholar
Werlau, Maria C. 2008. Political Repression in Castro’s Cuba: Policies, Institutions and Victims. In Political Violence: Belief, Behavior, and Legitimation. Ed. Hollander, Paul. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 143154.Google Scholar
Ben Jelloun, Tahar. 2001. Cette aveuglante absence de lumiere [This Blinding Absence of Light]. Paris: Editions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Equity and Reconciliation Commission. 2005. Report. Available at: www.ier.ma/, accessed on December 11, 2009.Google Scholar
Hazan, Pierre. 2008. The Nature of Sanctions: The Case of Morocco’s Equity and Reconciliation Commission. International Review of the Red Cross, 90(870): 399407.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch. 2005. Morocco’s Truth Commission: Honoring Past Victims during an Uncertain Present. November 17(11). Available at: www.hrw.org/reports/2005/morocco1105/morocco1105.pdf, accessed on November 19, 2009.Google Scholar
Montague, Maryam. 2005. Morocco’s Truth Revealed, and the Possibility of Reconciliation. Fletcher Forum of World Affairs, 29(2): 5965.Google Scholar
Perrault, Gilles. 1990. Notre ami le Roi [Our Friend, the King]. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Slyomovics, Susan. 2005. The Performance of Human Rights in Morocco. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Wilcox, Luke. 2009. Reshaping Civil Society through a Truth Commission: Human Rights in Morocco’s Process of Political Reform. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 3(1): 4968.Google Scholar
Cassese, Antonio. 2006. Balancing the Prosecution of Crimes against Humanity and Non-Retroactivity of Criminal Law. The Kolk and Kislyiy v. Estonia Case before the ECHR. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 4(2): 410418.Google Scholar
Hiio, Toomas, Maripuu, Meelis, and Paavle, Indrek, eds. 2006. Estonia 1940–1945: Reports of the Estonian International Commission for the Investigation of Crimes against Humanity. Tallinn: Estonian Foundation for the Investigation of Crimes against Humanity.Google Scholar
Lane, Nicholas. 1995. Estonia and Its Jews: An Ethical Dilemma. East European Jewish Affairs, 25(1): 316.Google Scholar
Meri, Lennart. 1999. A Word of Welcome by H. E. Lennard Meri, President of the Republic of Estonia, to the International Commission Investigating Crimes against Humanity in Estonia in Kadriorg, on January 26, 1999. Office of the President of the Republic. Available at: https://vp1992-2001.president.ee/eng/k6ned/K6ne.asp?ID=4316, accessed on July 18, 2022.Google Scholar
Onken, Eva-Clarita, 2007. The Politics of Finding Historical Truth: Reviewing Baltic History Commissions and their Work. Journal of Baltic Studies, 38(1): 109116.Google Scholar
Pettai, Eva-Clarita. 2015. Negotiating History for Reconciliation: A Comparative Evaluation of Baltic Presidential Commissions. Europe-Asia Studies, 67(7): 10791101.Google Scholar
Phase I: The Soviet Occupation of Estonia in 1940–1941, n.d.. Available at: https://mnemosyne.ee/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/conclusions_en_1940-1941.pdf, accessed on July 19, 2022.Google Scholar
Phase II: The German Occupation of Estonia in 1941–1944, n.d.. Available at: https://mnemosyne.ee/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/conclusions_en_1941-1944.pdf, accessed on July 19, 2022.Google Scholar
Phase III: The Soviet Occupation of Estonia from 1944, n.d.. Available at: https://mnemosyne.ee/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/conclusions_en_1944-.pdf, accessed on July 19, 2022.Google Scholar
Weiss-Wendt, Anton (2008). Why the Holocaust Does Not Matter in Estonia. Journal of Baltic Studies, 39(4): 475498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Çalı, Başak. 2010. The Logics of Supranational Human Rights Litigation, Official Acknowledgment, and Human Rights Reform: The Southeast Turkey Cases before the European Court of Human Rights, 1996–2006. Law & Social Inquiry, 35(2): 311337.Google Scholar
Brems, Eva. 2011. Transitional Justice in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights. The International Journal of Transitional Justice, 5(2): 282303.Google Scholar
Buyse, Antoine and Hamilton, Michael, eds. 2011. Transitional Jurisprudence and the ECHR: Justice Politics and Rights. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Council of Europe. 2017. The European Court Presents the Results of Its Work for 2017. Available at: www.echr.coe.int/documents/annual_report_2017_eng.pdf, accessed on July 19, 2022.Google Scholar
Council of Europe. Official webpage. Available at: www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Stats_analysis_2018_ENG.pdf, accessed on July 19, 2022.Google Scholar
Fijalkowski, Agata. 2014. Criminalisation of Symbols of the Past: Expression, Law and Memory. International Journal for Law in Context, 10(3): 295314.Google Scholar
Fijalkowski, Agata and Grosescu, Raluca, eds. 2015. Transitional Criminal Justice in Post-Dictatorial and Post-Communist States. Cambridge: Intersentia.Google Scholar
Horne, Cynthia M. 2009. International Legal Rulings on Lustration Policies in Central and Eastern Europe: Rule of Law in Historical Context. Law & Social Inquiry, 34(3): 713744.Google Scholar
International Crisis Group. 2010. Cyprus: Bridging the Property Divide. Europe Report 210. Available at: www.crisisgroup.org/europe-central-asia/western-europemediterranean/cyprus/cyprus-bridging-property-divide, accessed on September 25, 2018.Google Scholar
Leach, Philip. 2008. The Chechen Conflict: Analysing the Oversight of the European Court of Human Rights. European Human Rights Law Review, 6: 732761.Google Scholar
Stan, Lavinia. 2006. The Roof over Our Heads: Property Restitution in Romania. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 22(2): 180205.Google Scholar
Williams, Rhodri C. 2010. Demopoulos v. Turkey (Eur. Ct. H.R.), Introductory Note by Rhodri C. Williams. International Legal Materials, 49(3): 816849.Google Scholar
Brems, Eva. 2011. Transitional Justice in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 5(2): 282303.Google Scholar
European Parliament. 2008. Proposed Hearing of the Commission on Crimes of Genocide, Crimes against Humanity and War Crimes Committed by Totalitarian Regimes (8 April 2008). Available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+CRE+20080421+ITEM-015+DOC+XML+V0//EN (accessed August 3, 2010).Google Scholar
Gledhill, John. 2011. Integrating the Past: Regional Integration and Historical Reckoning in Central and Eastern Europe. Nationalities Papers, 39(4): 481506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, Florence. 2009. The ICTY and EU Conditionality. In War Crimes, Conditionality and EU Integration in the Western Balkans, Chaillot Paper n. 116. Eds. Judy Batt and Jelena Obradovic-Wocknik. Paris: Institute for Security Studies.Google Scholar
Peskin, Victor and Mieczysław, P. Boduszyński. 2011. Balancing International Justice in the Balkans: Surrogate Enforcers, Uncertain Transitions and the Road to Europe. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 5(1): 5274.Google Scholar
Unger, Thomas. 2010. The European Union and Transitional Justice. Centre for the Law of EU External Relations, Working Papers 2010/1. Available at http://www.asser.nl/upload/documents/2172010_25518CLEER%20WP%202010–1%20-%20UNGER.pdf (accessed June 21, 2011).Google Scholar
Cambodia Tribunal Monitor. Available at: http://www.cambodiatribunal.org/ (accessed November 1, 2010).Google Scholar
Cambodian Genocide Program. Official Web site. Available at: http://www.yale.edu/cgp/index.html (accessed November 1, 2010).Google Scholar
Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. Official Web site. Available at: http://www.eccc.gov.kh/ (accessed November 1, 2010).Google Scholar
Open Society Justice Initiative. 2006. Justice Initiatives: The Extraordinary Chambers, Spring. Available at: http://www.soros.org/initiatives/justice/articles_publications (accessed November 1, 2010).Google Scholar
Open Society Justice Initiative Updates on the ECCC. Available at: http://www.soros.org/initiatives/justice/articles_publications (accessed November 1, 2010).Google Scholar
Pham, Phuong, Vinck, Patrick, Balthazard, Mychelle, Hean, Sokhom, and Stover, Eric. 2009. So We Will Never Forget: A Population-Based Survey on Attitudes about Social Reconstruction and the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. Berkeley: Human Rights Center, University of California at Berkeley, January. Available at: http://hrc.berkeley.edu/pdfs/So-We-Will-Never-Forget.pdf (accessed June 22, 2010).Google Scholar
United Nations Assistance to the Khmer Rouge Trials (UNAKRT). Official Web site. Available at: http://www.unakrt-online.org (accessed November 1, 2010).Google Scholar
Conflict and Politics in Northern Ireland. Official website. Available at: https://cain.ulster.ac.uk/index.html, accessed on February 11, 2020.Google Scholar
Forum for Peace and Reconciliation. Archived official website, last updated in 1997. Available at: https://web.archive.org/web/19990222170129/http://www.fusio.ie/web1/forum/, accessed on February 11, 2020.Google Scholar
Gillespie, Gordon. 2007. Historical Dictionary of the Northern Ireland Conflict. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Chris and Tonge, Jonathan. 2019. Peace or War? Understanding the Peace Process in Northern Ireland. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Paul and Wilford, Rick, eds. 1998. Politics in Northern Ireland. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Anušauskas, Arvydas. 2012. Teroras 1940–1958 m [Terror in 1940–1958]. Vilnius: Versus Aureus.Google Scholar
Balkelis, Tomas and Davoliūtė, Violeta. 2018. Legislated History in Post-Communist Lithuania. In The Palgrave Handbook of State-Sponsored History after 1945. Ed. Bevernage, Berber and Wouters, Nico. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 121136.Google Scholar
Bubnys, Arūnas. 2015. The Holocaust in Lithuania between 1941 and 1944. Vilnius: Genocide and Resistance Research Center of Lithuania.Google Scholar
Budrytė, Dovilė. 2004. We Call It “Genocide”: Soviet Deportations and Repression in the Memory of Lithuanians. In The Genocidal Temptation: Auschwitz, Hiroshima, Rwanda, and Beyond. Ed. Frey, Robert S.. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, pp. 79100.Google Scholar
Davoliūtė, Violeta and Budrytė, Dovilė. 2018. Complicated Pasts, Reckoning and History Education in Lithuania. In Transitional Justice and the Former Soviet Union: Reviewing the Past and Looking toward the Future. Ed. Stan, Lavinia and Horne, Cynthia. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 323344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuodytė, Dalia and Tracevskis, Rokas. 2013. The Unknown War. Armed anti-Soviet Resistance in Lithuania in 1944–1953. Vilnius: Genocide and Resistance Research Center of Lithuania.Google Scholar
Kuodytė, Dalia and Tracevskis, Rokas. 2014. Siberia. Mass Deportations from Lithuania to the USSR. Vilnius: Genocide and Resistance Research Center of Lithuania.Google Scholar
Rudienė, Virginija and Juozevičiūtė, Vilma, eds. 2014. The Museum of Genocide Victims. Vilnius: Genocide and Resistance Research Center of Lithuania.Google Scholar
Bergmane, Una. 2018. The Fate of Former KGB Agents in Latvia. Baltic Bulletin. March 19. Available at: www.fpri.org/article/2018/03/the-fate-of-former-kgb-agents-in-latvia/, accessed on May 17, 2018.Google Scholar
Government Commission for KGB Research. Official Website. Available at: www.lu.lv/vdkkomisija/, accessed on September 4, 2018.Google Scholar
Lielais Brālis Tevi Vēro: VDK un tās piesegstruktūras (Proceedings of an International Conference from August 11–13, 2016 in Riga). 2016. In Valsts drošības komitejas zinātniskās izpētes komisijas raksti. Vol. 3. Riga.Google Scholar
Lielais Brālis Tevi Vēro: VDK un tās piesegstruktūras (Proceedings of an International Conference from August 11–13, 2016 in Riga). 2017. In Valsts drošības komitejas zinātniskās izpētes komisijas raksti. Vol. 4. Riga.Google Scholar
Pettai, Eva-Clarita and Pettai, Vello. 2015. Transitional and Retrospective Justice in the Baltic States. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ritvars, Jansons. 2016. LPSR Drošības Iestāžu Darbība (1944–1956) [Activity and Role of the Security Institutions of the Latvian SSR, 1944–1956]. In Valsts drošības komitejas zinātniskās izpētes komisijas raksti. Vol. 2. Riga.Google Scholar
Totalitārisma sabiedrības kontrole un represijas: dokumentu izpēte un tās metodoloģija (Proceedings of an International Conference from December 15–17, 2015 in Liepaja). 2016. In Valsts drošības komitejas zinātniskās izpētes komisijas raksti. Vol. 1. Riga.Google Scholar
Zake, Ieva. 2010. Politicians Versus Intellectuals in the Lustration Debates in Transitional Latvia. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 26(3): 389412.Google Scholar
Greensboro Truth and Reconciliation Commission. 2006. Greensboro Truth and Reconciliation Commission Report. Available at: https://hmcwordpress.humanities.mcmaster.ca/Truthcommissions/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/UnitedStates.Greensboro.TRC_.Report-FULL.pdf, accessed on July 19, 2009.Google Scholar
Jovanovic, Spoma. 2012. Democracy, Dialogue, and Community Action: Truth and Reconciliation in Greensboro. Fayetteville: University of Arkansas Press.Google Scholar
Magarrell, Lisa and Wesley, Joya. 2008. Learning from Greensboro: Truth and Reconciliation in the United States. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Jill. 2007. Truth and Reconciliation Comes to the South: Lessons from Greensboro. The Public Eye Magazine, Spring. Available at: www.publiceye.org/magazine/v21n2/reconciliation.html, accessed on September 13, 2009.Google Scholar
Isakhan, Benjamin. 2015. The Legacy of Iraq: From the 2003 War to the “Islamic State.” Edinburgh University Press; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meierhenrich, Jens. 2006. Ethics of Lustration. Ethics and International Affairs, 20: 99120.Google Scholar
Sissons, Miranda. 2008. Iraq’s New “Accountability and Justice” Law. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice.Google Scholar
Sissons, Miranda and al-Saiedi, Abdulrazzaq. 2013. A Bitter Legacy: Lessons of De-Baathification in Iraq. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice.Google Scholar
Stover, Eric, Megally, Hanny, and Mufti, Hania. 2005. Bremer’s “Gordian Knot”: Transitional Justice and the US Occupation of Iraq. Human Rights Quarterly, 27: 830857.Google Scholar
Act III/2003: On the Disclosure of the Secret Service Activities of the Communist Regime and on the Establishment of the Historical Archives of the Hungarian State Security. Available at: www.th.hu/html/en/acts/ABTL_4_2003_evi_III_tv_e.pdf, accessed on July 22, 2010.Google Scholar
Cseh, Gergő Bendegúz. 2007. A levéltári anyag feldolgozásának egy évtizede [One Decade of Organizing the Archive]. Available at: http://epa.oszk.hu/01200/01268/00004/cseh_gergo_bendeguz.htm, accessed on July 22, 2010.Google Scholar
Esterházy, Péter. 2002. Javított kiadás [Rev. Ed.]. Budapest: Magvető.Google Scholar
Expert Commission. 2007–2008. A Szakértői Bizottság jelentése 2007–2008 [The Report of the Expert Commission]. Available at: https://mek.oszk.hu/08400/08450/08450.pdf, accessed on November 2, 2009.Google Scholar
Historical Archives of the Hungarian State Security (Állambiztonsági Szolgálatok Történeti Levéltára). Official website. Available at: www.abtl.hu/, accessed on November 2, 2009.Google Scholar
House of Terror Museum, Official website. Available at: www.TerrorHaza.hu, accessed on July 29, 2010.Google Scholar
Judt, Tony. 2005. From the House of the Dead: On Modern European Memory. The New York Review of Books, October 6.Google Scholar
Kapitány, Ágnes and Kapitány, Gábor. 2008. Cultural Pattern of a Museum Guide (House of Terror, Budapest). In Politics of Collective Memory: Cultural Patterns of Commemorative Practices in Post-War Europe. Ed. Wahnich, Sophie, Lášticová, Barbara, and Findor, Andrej. Vienna: Lit Verlag, pp. 123141.Google Scholar
Kovács, Éva. 2003. The Cynical and the Ironical – Remembering Communism in Hungary. Regio – Minorities, Politics, Society, 18(1): 155–169. Available at: http://epa.oszk.hu/00400/00476/00003/pdf/09.pdf, accessed on August 4, 2010.Google Scholar
Losonczy, Anne-Marie. 2006. Deux figures muséales de la mémoire en Hongrie post-communist. Étude Balkaniques, (2): 147–158.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Mária, ed. 2003. Terror Háza, Andrássy út 60 [Terror House, 60 Andrássy Street]. Budapest: Közép-és Kelet-európai Történelem és Társadalom Kutatásáért Közalapítvány.Google Scholar
Sodaro, Amy. 2018. Exhibiting Atrocity: Memorial Museums and the Politics of Past Violence. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, pp. 5883.Google Scholar
Ungváry, Krisztián. 2003. A pártmúzeum [The Party-Museum]. Népszabadság. July 5.Google Scholar
Vincze, Viktor Attila. 2002. Orbán Viktor a Terror Háza megnyitóján – szó szerinti leírás [Viktor Orbán at the Opening of the House of Terror]. February 23. Available at: www.terrorhaza.hu/hirek/rolunk/terror_haza_megnyitoja.html, accessed on August 12, 2010.Google Scholar
Aka, Philip C. 2003. Nigeria since May 1999: Understanding the Paradox of Civil Rule and Human Rights Violations under President Obasanjo. San Diego International Journal of Law, 4: 209276.Google Scholar
Chief Gani Fawehinmi, Hon. Justice Chukwudifu Oputa (Rtd.) & Human Rights Violations Investigation Commission v. General Ibrahim Babangida, Brigadier Halilu Akilu and Brigadier Kunle Togun [2003] CHR 76-140.Google Scholar
Human Rights Violations Investigation Commission. 2005. Oputa Panel Report. January 1. Available at: www.dawodu.com/oputa1.htm, accessed on January 4, 2010.Google Scholar
Yusuf, Hakeem O. 2007. The Judiciary and Constitutionalism in Transitions: A Critique. Global Jurist, 7(3): 149.Google Scholar
Yusuf, Hakeem O. 2007. Travails of Truth: Achieving Justice for Victims of Impunity in Nigeria. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 1(2): 268284.Google Scholar
Yusuf, Hakeem O. 2008. Oil on Troubled Waters – Multinational Corporations and Realising Human Rights in the Developing World: A Nigerian Case Study. African Human Rights Law Journal, 8(1): 79108.Google Scholar
Quigley, John. 2006. The Genocide Convention: an International Law Analysis. Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Santalla Vargas, Elizabeth. 2009. Informe sobre Bolivia [Report on Bolivia]. In Justicia de Transición. Con Informes de América Latina, Alemania, Italia y España [Transitional Justice. With Country Reports of Latin America, Germany, Italy, and Spain]. Eds. Kai Ambos, Ezequiel Malarino, and Gisela Elsner. Montevideo/Bogotá: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung/Temis, pp. 153–170.Google Scholar
Santalla Vargas, Elizabeth. 2008. Informe sobre Bolivia [Report on Bolivia]. In Jurisprudencia Latinoamericana sobre Derecho Penal Internacional. Con un Informe Adicional sobre la Jurisprudencia Italiana. [Latin American Jurisprudence on International Criminal Law. With an Additional Report on the Italian Jurisprudence]. Eds. Kai Ambos, Ezequiel Malarino and Gisela Elsner. Montevideo/Bogotá: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung/Temis, pp. 67–93.Google Scholar
Dempster, Lauren. 2019. Transitional Justice and the ‘Disappeared’ of Northern Ireland: Silence, Memory, and the Construction of the Past. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Independent Commission for the Location of Victims’ Remains. Official website. Available at: www.iclvr.ie/, accessed on November 13, 2019.Google Scholar
Knupfer, Geoffrey C., Godfrey, Dennis, and Hill, Jon. 2018. The Independent Commission for the Location of Victims’ Remains in Ireland: A Case Study – The Abduction Murder and Secret Burial of Victim B. In Multidisciplinary Approaches to Forensic Archaeology. Ed. Barone, Pier Matteo and Mike Groen, W. J.. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
WAVE. 2012. The Disappeared of Northern Ireland’s ‘Troubles’. Belfast: WAVE Trauma Publications.Google Scholar
Comina, Marc. 2002. La Reponse de la Suisse au nazisme: “business as usual.” Le Temps. March 23. Available at: www.uek.ch/en/presse/uebrigepresse/020323temps.htm, accessed on April 20, 2011.Google Scholar
Independent Commission of Experts. 2002a. Official website. Available at: www.uek.ch/en/index.htm, accessed on April 19, 2011.Google Scholar
Independent Commission of Experts. 2002b. Switzerland, National Socialism and the Second World War. Final Report. Zurich: Pendo Verlag. Available at: www.uek.ch/en/schlussbericht/synthesis/ueke.pdf, accessed on April 20, 2011.Google Scholar
Junz, Helen. 2003. Confronting Holocaust History: The Bergier Commission’s Research on Switzerland’s Past, Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, no. 8. May 1. Available at www.jcpa.org/phas/phas-8.htm, accessed on April 19, 2011.Google Scholar
Komisar, Lucy. 2003. Offshore Banking: The Secret Threat to America. Dissent, Spring. Available at: www.dissentmagazine.org/article/?article=505, accessed on April 20, 2011.Google Scholar
Marks, David. 1997. The Train. Were Jews Transported through Switzerland to Nazi Death Camps? BBC Frontline. Available at: www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/nazis/train/, accessed on April 20, 2011.Google Scholar
Independent Commission of Historians. 2005. Questions Concerning Liechtenstein during the Nazi Era and the Second World War. Summary of the Final Report of the Independent Commission of Historians. March 29. Vaduz. Available at: www.liechtenstein.li/en/pdf-fl-historikerkommisssion-zusammenfassung.pdf, accessed on April 20, 2011.Google Scholar
Stolen Assets – Liechtenstein Helped the Nazis. 2000. Der Spiegel. July 24.Google Scholar
Bradfield, Michael. 1998–1999. The Role of the Independent Committee of Eminent Persons. American University International Law Review, 14: 231236.Google Scholar
Bradfield, Michael and Sak, Pamela. 2003. Swiss Law on the Treatment of Dormant Accounts: A Comparison with European and US Law. In Current Developments in Monetary and Financial Law. Ed. International Monetary Fund. Vol. 2. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund, pp. 773798.Google Scholar
Independent Committee of Eminent Persons. 1999. Report on Dormant Accounts of Victims of Nazi Persecution in Swiss Banks. December. Available at: www.crt-ii.org/ICEP/ICEP_Report_english.pdf, accessed on April 20, 2011.Google Scholar
Abouzeid, Rania. 2018. No Turning Back: Life, Loss, and Hope in Wartime Syria. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Elliot, Ingrid. 2017. “A Meaningful Step towards Accountability”? A View from the Field on the United Nations International, Impartial and Independent Mechanism for Syria. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 15(2): 239256.Google Scholar
Giovanni, Janine di. 2017. The Morning They Came for Us: Dispatches from Syria, New York: Liveright/W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Syrian Arab Republic Reports and Materials. Available at: www.ohchr.org/en/hrbodies/hrc/iicisyria/pages/independentinternationalcommission.aspx, accessed on February 29, 2020.Google Scholar
Igazságtétel? [Justice?]. 1998. Heti Világgazdaság. December 5, pp. 125–126.Google Scholar
Institut der Revolution in Ungarn finanziell bedroht. 1998. Süddeutsche Zeitung. December 4. p. 8.Google Scholar
Institute for the History of the 1956 Revolution. Official website. Available at: www.rev.hu/89/f?p=107:1:305236052623089, accessed on November 5. 2009.Google Scholar
Orbán Moves against Historical Research: The First Victim Is the 56-Institute. 2019. Hungarian Spectrum. June 2. Available at: https://hungarianspectrum.org/2019/06/02/orban-moves-against-historical-research-the-first-victim-is-the-56-institute/, accessed on September 16, 2019.Google Scholar
Válasz egy kívülálló gondolataira. 1999. Hegedűs B. András az’56-os Intézet jövőjéről [Response to the thoughts of an outsider. András B. Hegedűs on the future of the 1956 Institute]. Napi Magyarország. January 8. Available at: www.rev.hu/rev/images/content/sorsunk/emilek/hegedus.gif, accessed on July 17, 2010.Google Scholar
Constantin, Anemona. 2019. L’Institut d’Investigation des Crimes du Communisme en Roumanie. In La Criminalisation des passés dictatoriaux au XXème siècle. Manuel Numérique. Ed. Baby, Sophie, Neumayer, Laure, and Zalewski, Fréderic. Paris: Presses Universitaires de Paris Nanterre.Google Scholar
Grosescu, Raluca. 2017. Judging Communist Crimes in Romania. Transnational and Global Influences. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 11(3): 505524.Google Scholar
Institute for the Investigation of Communist Crimes and the Memory of the Romanian Exile. Official website. Available at: www.iiccr.ro, accessed on January 15, 2019.Google Scholar
Stamatescu, Mihai, Grosescu, Raluca, Dobrincu, Dorin, Muraru, Andrei, Plesa, Liviu, and Andreescu, Sorin. 2014. O Istorie a Comunismului din Romania. Manual pentru Liceu (A History of Romanian Communism. High-School Textbook). Iasi: Polirom.Google Scholar
Vlad, Laurentiu. 2007. Arhivele comunismului: surse istorice şi probe în justiţie. Cazul Institutului de Investigare a Crimelor Comunismului în România. Analele Universităţii din Bucureşti, seria Ştiinţe Politice, 9: 5156.Google Scholar
181/2007 Coll. Act of June 8, 2007 on the Institute for the Study of Totalitarian Regimes and the Security Services Archive, and on Amendments of some Acts. Available at: www.ustrcr.cz/en/relevant-legislation, accessed on July 15, 2018.Google Scholar
262/2011 Coll. Act of July 20, 2011 on the participants in anti-communist opposition and resistance. Available at: www.ustrcr.cz/en/relevant-legislation, accessed on July 15, 2018.Google Scholar
Institute for the Study of Totalitarian Regimes. Official website. Available at: www.ustrcr.cz/en, accessed on July 15, 2018.Google Scholar
Nedelsky, Nadya. 2009. Czechoslovakia, and the Czech and Slovak Republics. In Transitional Justice in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union: Reckoning with the Communist Past. Ed. Stan, Lavinia. New York: Routledge, pp. 3775.Google Scholar
The “European Network of Official Authorities in Charge of the Secret-Police Files.” A Reader on their Legal Foundations, Structures and Activities. Berlin. December 2009. Available at: https://comdos.bg/media/Nashite%20izdania/Netzwerk-Reader.pdf, accessed on July 27, 2022.Google Scholar
Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. 2006. The Act on the Establishment of the Ukrainian Institute of National Memory. May 31. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/764-2006-%D0%BF, accessed on December 5, 2019.Google Scholar
Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. 2011. The Act on the Establishment of the Ukrainian Institute of National Memory. January 12. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/8-2011-%D0%BF, accessed on March 9, 2020.Google Scholar
Hrytsenko, Oleksandr. 2017. Президенти і Пам’ять: політика пам’яті президентів України (1994–2014) [Presidents and Memory: The Politics of Memory of Ukraine’s Presidents (1994–2014)]. Kyiv: K.I.S.Google Scholar
Kasianov, Georgiy. 2018. Past Continuous: історична політика 1980-х–2000-х. Україна та сусіди [Past Continuous: Historical Politics of 1980s–2000s. Ukraine and the Neighbors]. Kyiv: Laurus.Google Scholar
Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. 2015a. Law on Access to Archives of Repressive Agencies of Totalitarian Communist Regime of 1917–1991. April 9. Available at: https://uinp.gov.ua/dokumenty/normatyvno-pravovi-akty-rozrobleni-v-instytuti/zakony/law-of-ukraine-on-access-to-archives-of-repressive-agencies-of-totalitarian-communist-regime-of-1917-1991, accessed on March 6, 2020.Google Scholar
Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. 2015b. Law on the Legal Status and Honoring the Memory of Fighters for Ukraine’s Independence in the Twentieth Century. April 9. Available at: https://uinp.gov.ua/dokumenty/normatyvno-pravovi-akty-rozrobleni-v-instytuti/zakony/law-of-ukraine-on-the-legal-status-and-honoring-the-memory-of-fighters-for-ukraines-independence-in-the-twentieth-century, accessed on March 6, 2020.Google Scholar
Ukrainian Institute of National Memory. 2008. The Book of Memory of the Victims of the Holodomor of 1932–1933. Vols. 1–19. Available at: www.memory.gov.ua:8080/ua/publication/content/1522.htm, accessed on December 9, 2019.Google Scholar
Ukrainian Institute of National Memory. Official Website. Available at: https://uinp.gov.ua/, accessed on December 2, 2019.Google Scholar
Yurchuk, Yuliya. 2017. Reclaiming the Past, Confronting the Past: OUN-UPA Memory Politics and Nation Building in Ukraine (1991–2016). In War and Memory in Russia, Ukraine and Belarus. Ed. Fedor, Julie, Kangaspuro, Markku, Lassila, Jussi, and Zhurzhenko, Tatiana. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 107137.Google Scholar
Dudek, A. 2011. Instytut. Osobista historia IPN [The Institute. A Personal History of the IPN]. Warsaw: Czerwone i Czarne.Google Scholar
Institute of National Remembrance. Official Website. Available at: https://ipn.gov.pl, accessed on June 5, 2020.Google Scholar
Persak, K. and Kamiński, L., eds. 2005. A Handbook of the Communist Security Apparatus in East Central Europe, 1944–1989. Warsaw: IPN.Google Scholar
Szczerbiak, A. 2018. Politicising the Communist Past. The Politics of Truth Revelation in Post-Communist Poland. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bickford, Louis. 2007. Unofficial Truth Projects. Human Rights Quarterly, 29(4): 9941035.Google Scholar
Guatemala: Never Again! Report of the Human Rights Office, Archdiocese of Guatemala. 1999. New York: Human Rights Office, Archdiocese of Guatemala.Google Scholar
Ogle, Kathy. 1998. Guatemala’s REMHI Project: Memory from Below. NACLA Report on the Americas, 32(2): 3334.Google Scholar
Boraine, Alex. 2008. A Life in Transition. London: Zebra Press.Google Scholar
International Center for Transitional Justice. Official website. Available at: www.ictj.org, accessed on January 5, 2019.Google Scholar
International Center for Transitional Justice. No date. Strategic Plan 2015–2018, Pursuing Justice in Changing Times. Available at: www.ictj.org/sites/default/files/ICTJ-Strategic-Plan-2015-EN.PDF, accessed on April 19, 2019.Google Scholar
International Center for Transitional Justice. No date. Strategic Plan 2018–2022. Available at: www.ictj.org/sites/default/files/ICTJ_2018-2022_Strategic_Plan.pdf, accessed on April 19, 2019.Google Scholar
Brett, Sebastian, Bickford, Louis, Ševčenko, Liz, and Rios, Marcela. 2008. Memorialization and Democracy: State Policy and Civic Action. Santiago de Chile: Latin American School of Social Sciences (FLACSO) – Chile, International Center for Transitional Justice, and International Coalition of Sites of Conscience. Available at: www.ictj.org/images/content/9/8/981.pdf, accessed on December 23, 2009.Google Scholar
Faulkner, William. 1951. Requiem for a Nun. London: Random House.Google Scholar
International Coalition of Sites of Conscience. Official website. Available at: www.sitesofconscience.org/en/, accessed on December 23, 2009.Google Scholar
International Coalition of Sites of Conscience. 2008. Connecting Past and Present. 2008 Report. New York. Available at: www.sitesofconscience.org/wp-content/documents/publications/connecting-en.pdf, accessed on December 23, 2009.Google Scholar
Ševčenko, Liz. 2004. The Power of Place: How Historic Sites Can Engage Citizens in Human Rights Issues. Available at: www.sitesofconscience.org/wp-content/documents/publications/power-of-place-en.pdf, accessed on December 23, 2009.Google Scholar
Ševčenko, Liz and Russell-Ciardi, Maggie. 2008. Sites of Conscience: Opening Historic Sites for Civic Dialogue. The Public Historian, 30(1): 915.Google Scholar
Till, Karen E. 2008. Artistic and Activist Memory-Work: Approaching Place-Based Practice. Memory Studies, 1(1): 99113.Google Scholar
Anušauskas, Arvydas. 2006. The First Soviet Occupation. Terror and Crimes against Humanity. Vilnius: Margi raštai.Google Scholar
Bravin, Nick. 2009. In Other Words: Baltic Ghosts. Foreign Policy. September 30. https://foreignpolicy.com/2009/09/30/in-other-words-baltic-ghosts/.Google Scholar
Davoliūtė, Violeta and Budrytė, Dovilė. 2018. Complicated Pasts, Reckoning and History Education in Lithuania. In Transitional Justice and the Former Soviet Union: Reviewing the Past and Looking toward the Future. Ed. Stan, Lavinia and Horne, Cynthia. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 323344.Google Scholar
Dieckmann, Christoph and Sužiedėlis, Saulius. 2006. Lietuvos žydų persekiojimas ir masinės žudynės 1941 m. vasarą ir rudenį: šaltiniai ir analizė. [The Persecution and Mass Murder of Lithuanian Jews during Summer and Fall 1941: Sources and Analysis]. Vilnius: Margi raštai.Google Scholar
International Commission for the Evaluation of the Crimes of the Nazi and the Soviet Occupation Regimes in Lithuania. Official website. Available at: www.komisija.lt, accessed on July 12, 2018.Google Scholar
Jakubčionis, Algirdas, Knezys, Stasys, and Streikus, Arūnas. 2006. Pirmoji sovietinė okupacija. Okupacija ir aneksija [The First Soviet Occupation. Occupation and Annexation]. Vilnius: Margi raštai.Google Scholar
Pettai, Eva-Clarita. 2015. Negotiating History for Reconciliation: A Comparative Evaluation of the Baltic Presidential Commissions. Europe-Asia Studies, 67(7): 10791101.Google Scholar
Sužiedėlis, Saulius. 2018. The International Commission for the Evaluation of the Crimes of the Nazi and Soviet Occupation Regimes in Lithuania: Successes, Challenges. Perspectives. Journal of Baltic Studies, 49(1): 103116.Google Scholar
Truska, Liudas and Vareikis, Vygandas. 2004. Holokausto prielaidos: antisemitizmas Lietuvoje XIX a. antroji pusė–1941 m. birželis. [The Preconditions for the Holocaust: Anti-Semitism in Lithuania, Second Half of the 19th Century–June 1941]. Vilnius: Margi raštai.Google Scholar
Robinson, Geoffrey. 2009. If You Leave Us Here, We Will Die: How Genocide Was Stopped in East Timor. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tanter, Richard, Selden, Mark, and Shalom, Stephen R., eds. 2001. Bitter Flowers, Sweet Flowers: East Timor, Indonesia, and the World Community. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. 1999. Report on the Human Rights Situation in East Timor. E/CN.4/S-4/CRP.1. September. Available at: https://reliefweb.int/report/indonesia/executive-summary-report-investigation-human-rights-violations-east-timor, accessed on July 27, 2022.Google Scholar
United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. 1999. Situation of Human Rights in East Timor. 1999/S-4/1. September. Available at: https://reliefweb.int/report/indonesia/situation-human-rights-east-timor, accessed on July 27, 2022.Google Scholar
United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. 2000. Report of the International Commission of Inquiry on East Timor to the Secretary-General. A/54/726, S/2000/59. January. Available at: https://reliefweb.int/report/indonesia/report-international-commission-inquiry-east-timor, accessed on July 27, 2022.Google Scholar
Bassiouni, Cherif. 2005. The Legislative History of the International Criminal Court. Ardsley: Transnational Publishers.Google Scholar
Bosco, David. 2014. Rough Justice: The International Criminal Court in a World of Power Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cassese, Antonio. 2003. The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, Kamari Maxine. 2009. Fictions of Justice: The International Criminal Court and the Challenge of Legal Pluralism in Sub-Saharan Africa. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Novak, Andrew. 2015. The International Criminal Court: An Introduction. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Sadat, Leila Nadya. 2002. The International Criminal Court and the Transformation of International Law. Justice for the New Millennium. Ardsley: Transnational Publishers.Google Scholar
Schabas, William. 2017. An Introduction to the International Criminal Court. 5th ed. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stewart, David. 2014. International Criminal Law in a Nutshell. St. Paul: West Academic.Google Scholar
Waddell, Nicholas and Clark, Phil. 2008. Courting Conflict? Justice, Peace and the ICC in Africa. London: Royal Africa Society.Google Scholar
Clark, P. and Kaufman, Z. D., eds. 2009. After Genocide: Transitional Justice, Post-Conflict Reconstruction, and Reconciliation in Rwanda and Beyond. London: C. Hurst & Co.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Z. D. 2016. United States Law and Policy on Transitional Justice: Principles, Politics, and Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Morris, V. and Scharf, M. P., eds. 1998. The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. 2 vols. Irvington-on-Hudson, NY: Transnational Publishers.Google Scholar
Schabas, W. 2006. The UN International Criminal Tribunals: The Former Yugoslavia, Rwanda, and Sierra Leone. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stereo, M. and Scharf, M. P., eds. 2019. The Legacy of Ad Hoc Tribunals in International Criminal Law. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hazan, Pierre. 2004. Justice in a Time of War: The True Story Behind the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar
Kerr, Rachel. 2004. The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia: An Exercise in Law, Politics, and Diplomacy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swart, Bert, Zahar, Alexander, and Sluiter, Göran. 2011. The Legacy of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Adler, Nanci. 1993. Victims of Soviet Terror: The Story of the Memorial Movement. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Adler, Nanci. 2002. The Gulag Survivor: Beyond the Soviet System. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Interview with Arseny Roginsky. May 12, 1989. Radio Liberty report of a broadcast of March 12/13, 1989.Google Scholar
Memorial. Official website. Available at: www.memo.ru/, accessed on June 27, 2018.Google Scholar
Memorial. The Memorial Society Archive. Available at: www.memo.ru/ru-ru/collections/databases/, accessed on June 27, 2018.Google Scholar
Smith, Kathleen. 1996. Remembering Stalin’s Victims: Popular Memory and the End of the USSR. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Boister, Neil and Cryer, Robert. 2008. The Tokyo International Military Tribunal: A Reappraisal. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Futamura, Madoka. 2008. War Crimes Tribunals and Transitional Justice: The Tokyo Trial and the Nuremberg Legacy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Guillemin, Jeanne. 2017. Hidden Atrocities: Japanese Germ Warfare and American Obstruction of Justice at the Tokyo Trial. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Yuki, McCormack, Tim, and Simpson, Gerry, eds. 2011. Beyond Victors’ Justice? The Tokyo War Crimes Trial Revisited. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
Totani, Yuma. 2008. The Tokyo War Crimes Trial: The Pursuit of Justice in the Wake of World War II. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Alexandru, Florian, ed. 2018. Holocaust: Public Memory in Postcommunist Romania. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Friling, T., Ioanid, R., and Ionescu, E. M., eds. 2005. Raport Final: Comisia Internationala pentru Studierea Holocaustului din Romania [Final Report: International Commission for Studying the Holocaust in Romania]. Iasi: Polirom. Available at: www.insh-ew.ro/files/Raport%20Final/Final-Raport.pdf, accessed on June 2, 2018.Google Scholar
Ioanid, Radu. 2000. The Holocaust in Romania: The Destruction of Jews and Gypsies under the Antonescu Regime, 1940–1944. Chicago: Ivan R. Dee.Google Scholar
Popa, Ion. 2017. The Romanian Orthodox Church and the Holocaust. Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Shafir, Michael. 2002. Intre Negare si Trivializare prin Comparatie: Negarea Holocaustului in Tarile Postcomuniste din Europa Centrala si de Est [Between Denial and “Comparative Trivialization”: Holocaust Negationism in Post-Communist East Central Europe]. Iasi: Polirom.Google Scholar
Waldman, Felicia. 2004. Coming to Terms with the Recent Past: Holocaust Education in Post-communist Romania. East European Perspectives. July 8. Available at: http://rferl.org/a/1342462.html, accessed on June 2, 2018.Google Scholar
Barahona de Brito, Alexandra. 1997. Human Rights and Democratization in Latin America: Uruguay and Chile. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Investigative Commission. 1987a. Majority Report. Chamber of Representatives Diary of Sessions. October 13. Vol. 631. Montevideo: Library of the Legislature, pp. 537–551.Google Scholar
Investigative Commission. 1987b. Minority Report. Chamber of Representatives Diary of Sessions. October 13. Vol. 631. Montevideo: Library of the Legislature, pp. 551554.Google Scholar
Juez no alcanzó a notificar a Bordaberry fallo condenatorio [Judge Was Unable to Notify Bordaberry of Condemnatory Verdict]. 2011. La República. July 23. Available at: www.lr21.com.uy/politica/463985-juez-no-alcanzo-a-notificar-a-bordaberry-fallo-condenatorio, accessed on April 27, 2018.Google Scholar
Melgar-Hourcade, Florencia. 2006. Sabotaje a la Verdad [Sabotage of the Truth]. Montevideo: Editorial Planeta.Google Scholar
Peace and Justice Service (Uruguay). 1992. Uruguay Nunca Más: Human Rights Violations, 1972–1985. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Pérez, Mauricio. 2010. Fiscal Guianze pedirá 30 años para Bordaberry por homicidios de 1976 [District Attorney Guianze Will Demand Thirty Years for Bordaberry for the 1976 Murders]. La República. January 19. Available at: www.larepublica.com.uy/politica/397050-fiscal-guianze-pedira-30-anos-para-bordaberry-por-homicidios-de-1976, accessed on February 1, 2010.Google Scholar
Pre-Investigative Commission. 1985. Report. Chamber of Representatives Diary of Sessions. April 9. Vol. 617. Montevideo: Library of the Legislature, pp. 6375.Google Scholar
Chamber of Senators. 1990. Diary of Sessions. June 13. Vol. 330. Available at: www.parlamento.gub.uy/sesiones/AccesoSesiones.asp?Url=/sesiones/diarios/senado/html/19900613s0026.htm– numeral5, accessed on August 27, 2010.Google Scholar
Información del Ministerio de Defensa puede permitir el avance de la causa Elena Quinteros [Information from the Ministry of Defense can help progress in the investigation for Elena Quinteros]. 2018. Observatorio Luz Ibarburu. April 13. Available at: www.observatorioluzibarburu.org/noticias/informacion-del-ministerio-de-defensa-puede-permitir-el-avance-de-la-causa-elena-quinteros, accessed on April 27, 2018.Google Scholar
Investigative Commission. 1990a. Araújo Report. Chamber of Senators Diary of Sessions. September 6–7. Vol. 333. Montevideo: Library of the Legislature, pp. 49–86.Google Scholar
Investigative Commission. 1990b. Cassina Report. Chamber of Senators Diary of Sessions. September 6–7. Vol. 333. Montevideo: Library of the Legislature, pp. 9–48.Google Scholar
Investigative Commission. 1990c. Majority Report. Chamber of Senators Diary of Sessions. September 6–7. Vol. 333. Montevideo: Library of the Legislature, pp. 3–6.Google Scholar
Investigative Commission. 1990d. Pereyra Report. Chamber of Senators Diary of Sessions. September 6–7. Vol. 333. Montevideo: Library of the Legislature, pp. 6–8.Google Scholar
Pre-Investigative Commission. 1990. Report. Chamber of Senators Diary of Sessions. June 20. Vol. 330. Montevideo: Library of the Legislature, pp. 74–76.Google Scholar
Quinteros: juez condenó a Blanco [Quinteros: A Judge Sentenced Blanco]. 2010. La República. April 21. Available at: www.larepublica.com.uy/politica/407571-quinteros-juez-condeno-a-blanco, accessed on July 19, 2010.Google Scholar
Dougherty, Beth. 2004. Victims’ Justice, Victors’ Justice: Iraq’s Flawed Tribunal. Middle East Policy, 11: 6174.Google Scholar
Newton, Michael and Scharf, Michael. 2008. Enemy of the State: The Trial and Execution of Saddam Hussein. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Scharf, Michael and McNeal, Gregory, eds. 2006. Saddam on Trial: Understanding and Debating the Iraqi High Tribunal. Durham: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sissons, Miranda and Bassin, Ari S.. 2007. Was the Dujail Trial Fair? Journal of International Criminal Justice, 5: 272286.Google Scholar
Chang, Iris. 1997. The Rape of Nanking: The Forgotten Holocaust of World War II. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Hatano, Sumio and Shōji, Junichirō. 2010. Nitchū sensō – Nihongun no shinryaku to Chūgoku no kōsen [Japan–China War – The Invasion of Japanese Army and China’s Resistance War]. Available at: www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/area/china/pdfs/rekishi_kk_j-2.pdf, accessed on March 12, 2011.Google Scholar
Japan–China Joint History Research Project. 2010. Dai 1 ki Nitchū rekishi kyōdō kenkyū hōkokusho [Report on the First Phase of the Japan-China Joint History Research]. Available at: www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/area/china/pdfs/rekishi_kk_j-1.pdf, accessed on March 12, 2011.Google Scholar
Jiang, Lifeng. 2010. Gudai Dongya shijie zhongde Zhongri guanxi [Sino-Japanese Relations in the Ancient East Asian World]. Available at: www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/area/china/pdfs/rekichi_kk_c.pdf, accessed on March 12, 2011.Google Scholar
Lim, Jie-Hyun. 2018. World History, Nationally: How Has the National Appropriated the Transnational in East Asian Historiography? In Global History, Globally: Research and Practice around the World. Ed. Beckert, Sven and Sachsenmaier, Dominic. London: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 251268.Google Scholar
Nishio, Kanji. 1999. Kokumin no rekishi [History of the People of the Nation]. Tokyo: Sankei Shimbun-sha.Google Scholar
Rong, Weimu. 2010. Zhongri gongtong lishi yanjiuzhong lishi renshi de yitong: yi Nanjing datusha weili [Differences and Similarities in Historical Understanding between the Chinese and Japanese in the JHRP: The Nanjing Massacre Case], unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Wada, Haruki. 2008. The Comfort Women, the Asian Women’s Fund and the Digital Museum. The Asia-Pacific Journal, February 1. Available at: https://apjjf.org/-Wada-Haruki/2653/article.html, accessed on August 2, 2022.Google Scholar
Wang, Q. Edward. 2010. Remembering the Past; Reconciling for the Future: A Critical Analysis of the China-Japan Joint History Research Project (2006–2010). The Chinese Historical Review, 17(2): 219237.Google Scholar
Yang, Daqing and Mochizuki, Mike, eds. 2018. Memory, Identity, and Commemoration of World War II: Anniversary Politics in Asia Pacific. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
David, Becker and Elizabeth, Lira, eds. 1989. Derechos humanos: todo es según el dolor con que se mira. Santiago: Ediciones ILAS.Google Scholar
Becker, D., Castillo, M., Gómez, E., Kovalskys, J., and Lira, E.. 1995. Therapy with Victims of Political Repression. In Transitional Justice. Ed. Kritz, Neil. Washington DC: United States, Institute of Peace, pp. 583593.Google Scholar
Becker, D., Morales, G., and Aguilar, M.I., eds. 1994. Trauma psicosocial y adolescentes latinoamericanos: Formas de acción grupal [Psychosocial Trauma and Latin American Teenagers: Forms of Group Action]. Santiago: CESOC Editores.Google Scholar
Castillo, M. I. and Piper, Isabel, eds. 1998. Voces y ecos de violencia [Voices and Echoes of Violence]. Santiago: CESOC Editores.Google Scholar
Elizabeth, Lira, ed. 1997. Reparación, derechos humanos y salud mental [Reparations, Human Rights, and Mental Health]. Santiago: CESOC Editores.Google Scholar
Lira, Elizabeth and Castillo, María Isabel. 1991. Psicología de la Amenaza Política y del Miedo [Psychology of Political Threat and Fear]. Santiago: CESOC Editores.Google Scholar
Czarnota, Adam. 2007. The Politics of Lustration in Poland, 1989–2006. In Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies. Ed. Mayer-Rieckh, Alexander and DeGreiff, Pablo. New York: Social Science Research Council.Google Scholar
Horne, Cynthia. 2009a. International Legal Rulings on Lustration Policies in Central and Eastern Europe: Rule of Law in Historical Context. Law & Social Inquiry, 34: 713744.Google Scholar
Horne, Cynthia. 2009b. Late Lustration Programmed in Romania and Poland: Supporting or Undermining Democratic Transitions? Democratization, 16: 344377.Google Scholar
Krotoszyński, Michał. 2014. Polish Lustration and the Models of Transitional Justice. Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review, 3: 199211.Google Scholar
Stan, Lavinia. 2006. The Politics of Memory in Poland: Lustration, File Access and Court Proceedings. Studies in Post-Communism. Occasional Paper no. 10: 1–56.Google Scholar
Szczerbiak, Aleks. 2005. Dealing with the Communist Past or the Politics of the Present? Lustration in Post-Communist Poland. Europe-Asia Studies, 54: 553572.Google Scholar
Collins, Bennett, McEvoy-Levy, Siobhan, and Watson, Alison. 2014. The Maine Wabanaki-State Child Welfare Truth and Reconciliation Commission: Perceptions and Understandings. In Indigenous Peoples’ Access to Justice. Ed. Littlechild, Wilton and Stamatopoulou, Elsa. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 140169.Google Scholar
Dunphy, Hannah. no date. Shadows in Dawnland. Wabanaki Tribes and the State of Maine Set out to Hear the Truth about a Painful Past. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. Available at: www.ictj.org/sites/default/files/subsites/maine-wabanaki-truth/, accessed on June 12, 2019.Google Scholar
Maine-Wabanaki REACH. Official website. Available at: www.mainewabanakireach.org, accessed on June 14, 2019.Google Scholar
Maine Wabanaki-State Child Welfare Truth and Reconciliation Commission. 2015. Beyond the Mandate. Continuing the Conversation. Report of the Maine Wabanaki-State Child Welfare Truth & Reconciliation Commission. June 14. Available at: www.mainewabanakitrc.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/TRC-Report-Expanded_July2015.pdf, accessed on June 12, 2019.Google Scholar
Palmiste, Claire. 2011. From the Indian Adoption Project to the Indian Child Welfare Act: The Resistance of Native American Communities. Indigenous Policy Journal, 22(1): 110.Google Scholar
Bouvard, Marguerite. 1994. Revolutionizing Motherhood: The Mothers of the Plaza de Mayo. Delaware: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Diago, Alejandro. 1993. Conversando con las Madres de Plaza de Mayo; Hebe de Bonafini, memoria y esperanza [Conversations with the Mothers of the Plaza de Mayo; Hebe de Bonafini, Memory and Hope]. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Dialectica, Dereches Humanos.Google Scholar
Trigona, Marie. 2006. Argentina’s Mothers of the Plaza de Mayo pass on a legacy of Defending Human Rights. March 9. Available at: https://towardfreedom.org/story/archives/americas/argentinas-mothers-of-plaza-de-mayo-pass-on-a-legacy-of-defending-human-rights/, accessed on July 31, 2022.Google Scholar
Correa, Christian and Gbery, Didier. 2016. Recommendations for Victim Reparations in Côte d’Ivoire: Responding to the Rights and Needs of Victims of the Most Serious Violations. ICTJ Briefing. Available at: www.ictj.org/sites/default/files/ICTJ-Briefing-CDI-Reparations.pdf, accessed on June 18, 2019.Google Scholar
Présidence de la République. 2016. Le Chef de l’Etat a reçu le Rapport final de la CONARIV et le fichier unique consolidé des victimes. April 19. Available at: www.presidence.ci/le-chef-de-letat-a-recu-le-rapport-final-de-la-conariv-et-le-fichier-unique-consolide-des-victimes, accessed on June 18, 2019.Google Scholar
Radiotélévision Ivoirienne RTI. 2016. Côte d’Ivoire: La Conariv remet son rapport au Président Alassane Ouattara (Illustration). Available at: www.youtube.com/watch?v=EBpSvJaNB5o, accessed on June 19, 2019.Google Scholar
United States Department of State Country, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor. 2016. Rapport 2016 sur les droits de l’homme: Côte d’Ivoire. Available at: https://ci.usembassy.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/29/CI-HRR-2016-FRE-FINAL.pdf, accessed on June 19, 2019.Google Scholar
Lagos, Ricardo. 2003. No Hay Mañana sin Ayer [There Is No Tomorrow without Yesterday]. Available at: www.undp.org/es/guatemala/publications/no-hay-mañana-sin-ayer, accessed on July 31, 2022.Google Scholar
National Commission of Political Imprisonment and Torture. 2005. Informe [Final Report]. Available at: https://bibliotecadigital.indh.cl/handle/123456789/455, accessed on July 31, 2022.Google Scholar
National Commission of Political Imprisonment and Torture. no year. Nomina de Personas Reconocidas como Victimas en Etapa de Reconsideration [List of Persons Recognized as Victims in the Reconsideration Stage]. Available at: https://bibliotecadigital.indh.cl/handle/123456789/185, accessed on July 31, 2022.Google Scholar
Supreme Decree 1040, September 26, 2003. Available at: www.usip.org/sites/default/files/file/resources/collections/commissions/Chile03-Charter_decree1040.pdf, accessed on July 31, 2022.Google Scholar
Acuña, C., González Bombal, I., Jelin, E., Landi, O., Quevedo, L., Smulovitz, C., and Vacchieri, A., eds. 1995. Juicio, castigos y memorias, Derechos Humanos y justicia en la política Argentina [Trial, Punishment and Memories: Human Rights and Justice in Argentinean Politics]. Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión.Google Scholar
Comisión Nacional sobre la Desaparición de Personas (CONADEP). 1984. Nunca Más. Informe de la Comisión Nacional sobre la Desaparición de Personas. Buenos Aires: EUDEBA. [Published in English as National Commission on the Disappearance of People. Never Again: a Report by Argentina’s National Commission on Disappeared People. New York: Farrar Straus Giroux, 1986.]Google Scholar
Crenzel, Emilio. 2008. La historia política del Nunca Más. La memoria de las desapariciones en la Argentina [The Political History of Never Again. The Memory of the Disappearances in Argentina]. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI Editores.Google Scholar
Grandin, Greg. 2005. The Instruction of Great Catastrophe: Truth Commissions, National History, and State Formation in Argentina. Chile and Guatemala. American Historical Review, 110(1): 4667.Google Scholar
Hayner, Priscilla. 2001. Unspeakable Truth: Confronting State Terror and Atrocity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nino, Carlos. 1996. Radical Evil on Trial. Connecticut: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Thomas. 2007. State Terrorism in Latin America: Chile, Argentina, and International Human Rights. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Accatino, Daniela and Collins, Cath. 2016. Truth, Evidence, Truth: The Deployment of Testimony, Archives and Technical Data in Domestic Human Rights Trials. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 8(1): 81100.Google Scholar
Collins, Cath. 2010. Post-Transitional Justice: Human Rights Trials in Chile and El Salvador. University Park: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Lira, Elizabeth and Loveman, Brian. 2000. Las Ardientes Cenizas del Olvido: Vía chilena de reconciliación política 1932–1994 [The Glowing Embers of Forgetfulness: Chile’s Path to Political Reconciliation 1932–1994]. Santiago de Chile: LOM Ediciones.Google Scholar
National Commission on Truth and Reconciliation. 1991. Informe de la Comisión Nacional de Verdad y Reconciliación [Report of the National Commission on Truth and Reconciliation]. Santiago: Government of Chile. Available at: https://bibliotecadigital.indh.cl/handle/123456789/170, accessed on July 31, 2022.Google Scholar
National Commission on Truth and Reconciliation 1993, Report of the Chilean National Commission on Truth and Reconciliation. Available at www.usip.org/sites/default/files/resources/collections/truth_commissions/Chile90-Report/Chile90-Report.pdf, accessed on July 31, 2022.Google Scholar
National Corporation on Reparations and Reconciliation. 1996. Informe sobre calificación de víctimas de violaciones de derechos humanos y de la violencia política [Report on Victims of Human Rights Violations and Political Violence]. Santiago: Government of Chile.Google Scholar
Respuestas de las Fuerzas Armadas y de Orden al Informe de la Comisión Nacional de Verdad y Reconciliación [Responses of the Armed Forces and the Police to the National Commission of Truth and Reconciliation Report]. Estudios Públicos, 41(1991): 449–504.Google Scholar
Zalaquett, José. 1992. Balancing Ethical Imperatives and Political Constraints: The Dilemma of New Democracies Confronting Past Human Rights Violations. Hastings Law Journal, 43(2): 14251438.Google Scholar
Comisionado Nacional de los Derechos Humanos de la República de Honduras. 2018. Informe Anual 2017. Tegucigalpa: Comisionado Nacional. Available at: http://conadeh.hn, accessed on May 17, 2018.Google Scholar
US Congress. House Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, Subcommittee on Government Management, Information and Technology. 1998. Testimony of Dr. Leo Valladares Lanza, National Commissioner for Human Rights in Honduras on The Human Rights Information Act (H.R. 2635). May 11. Available at: www.fas.org/sgp/congress/hr051198/valladares.html, accessed on May 17, 2018.Google Scholar
Valladares, Leo. 1994. Honduras: The Facts Speak for Themselves: The Preliminary Report of the National Commissioner for the Protection of Human Rights in Honduras. New York: Human Rights Watch.Google Scholar
Valladares, Leo and Peacock, Susan C.. 1997. In Search of Hidden Truths: An Interim Report on Declassification by the National Commissioner for Human Rights in Honduras. Washington DC: The National Security Archive. Available at: https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/latin_america/honduras/hidden_truths/hidden.htm, accessed on July 31, 2022.Google Scholar
Kim, Hunjoon. 2014. The Massacres at Mt. Halla: Sixty Years of Truth Seeking in South Korea. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Memorial Committee for the 70th Anniversary of the Jeju April 3rd Uprising and Massacre. 2018. What Is the Jeju April 3rd Uprising and Massacre? Available at: file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/43_%EC%86%8C%EC%B1%85%EC%9E%90%EC%98%81%EB%AC%B8.pdf, accessed on July 31, 2022.Google Scholar
National Committee for the Investigation of the Truth about the Jeju April 3 Events. 2003. Official Report of the National Committee for Investigation of the Truth about the Jeju April 3 Events. Available at: https://jeju43peace.or.kr, accessed on July 31, 2022.Google Scholar
Bundesbehörde für die Stasi-Unterlagen (BStU). 2013. The European Network of Official Authorities in Charge of the Secret Police Files: A Reader on their Legal Foundations, Structures and Activities. 2nd rev. ed. Berlin: BStU, pp. 5867.Google Scholar
Consiliul Naţional pentru Studierea Arhivelor Securităţii. Official website. Available at: www.cnsas.ro, accessed on October 2, 2018.Google Scholar
Horne, Cynthia. 2015. “Silent Lustration”: Public Disclosures as Informal Lustration Mechanisms in Bulgaria and Romania. Problems of Post-Communism, 62(3): 131144.Google Scholar
Leśkiewicz, Rafał, and Žáček, Pavel, eds. 2013. Handbook of the European Network of Official Authorities in Charge of the Secret-Police Files. Prague: ÚSTR & IPN, pp. 219230.Google Scholar
Petrescu, Dragoş. 2017. Public Exposure Without Lustration. In Justice, Memory and Redress in Romania: New Insights. Ed. Stan, Lavinia and Turcescu, Lucian. Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom: Cambridge Scholars, pp. 124144.Google Scholar
Stan, Lavinia. 2013. Transitional Justice in Post-Communist Romania: The Politics of Memory. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission. 1997. Bringing Them Home: Report of the National Inquiry into the Separation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children from Their Families. Canberra: Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission.Google Scholar
Manne, Robert. 2001. In Denial: The Stolen Generations and the Right. Melbourne: Schwartz Publishing.Google Scholar
Rabbit-Proof Fence. 2002. VHS. Directed by Phillip Noyce. NSW: Australian Film Finance Corporation Ltd.Google Scholar
Center for Democratic Development. 2001. Public Opinion on National Reconciliation in Ghana: Survey Evidence. Research Paper, No. 10. Accra: CDD-Ghana.Google Scholar
Kwame Ameh, Robert. 2006. Uncovering Truths: Ghana’s National Reconciliation Excavation of Past Human Rights Abuses. Contemporary Justice Review, 9(4): 345368.Google Scholar
National Reconciliation Commission. 2004. National Reconciliation Commission Report: Executive Summary. Accra: Inter-Participations Agency.Google Scholar
Amnesty International. 2002. Guatemala’s Lethal Legacy: Past Impunity and Renewed Human Rights Violations. AMR 34/009/2002/s.Google Scholar
Gómez Isa, Felipe. ed. 2000. Racismo y Genocidio en Guatemala [Racism and Genocide in Guatemala]. Donostia: Gakoa.Google Scholar
Impunity Watch. 2013. Derecho a la reparación en Guatemala: por la senda de la negación [The Right to Reparation in Guatemala: On the Path of Denial]. Policy Brief. Available at: www.impunitywatch.org/post/derecho-a-la-reparaci%C3%B3n-en-guatemala-por-la-senda-de-la-negaci%C3%B3n, accessed on August 3, 2022.Google Scholar
Impunity Watch. 2018. What Is the Future of Reparations in Guatemala? Available at: www.impunitywatch.org/international-seminar-what-is-the, accessed on August 3, 2022.Google Scholar
Informe del Procurador de los Derechos Humanos. 2006. Aspectos sustantivos de la política de reparaciones ejecutada por el Programa Nacional de Resarcimiento [Substantive Aspects of the Reparations Policy by the National Reparations Program]. Available at: https://xdoc.mx/documents/aspectos-sustantivos-de-la-politica-de-reparaciones-5fe968b14d8ef, accessed on August 3, 2022.Google Scholar
Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. 2003. Justice and Social Inclusion: Challenges to Democracy in Guatemala, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.118. Doc. 5 rev.1, December 29.Google Scholar
Jonas, S. and Walker, T.. 2000. Guatemala. Intervention, Repression, Revolt and Negotiated Transition. In Repression, Resistance and Democratic Transition in Central America. Ed. Walker, Thomas and Armony, Ariel. Wilmington: Scholarly Resources.Google Scholar
Oficina de Derechos Humanos del Arzobispado de Guatemala. 1998. Guatemala Nunca Más. Impactos de la Violencia [Guatemala Never Again. Impacts of Violence]. 4 vols. Guatemala: Oficina de Derechos Humanos del Arzobispado de Guatemala.Google Scholar
Programa Nacional de Resarcimiento. 2008. La Vida no tiene Precio [Life Has no Price]. Guatemala City: Programa Nacional de Resarcimiento.Google Scholar
Information Libre. 1997. Vérité et Justice IX.00 (January): 2240.Google Scholar
Proposition pour une Commission de la Vérité en Haïti: Éléments constitutifs. Montreal: International Centre for Human Rights and Democratic Development, 1994.Google Scholar
Quinn, Joanna R. 2009. Haiti’s Failed Truth Commission: Lessons in Transitional Justice. Journal of Human Rights, 8(3): 265281.Google Scholar
Quinn, Joanna R. 2010. The Politics of Acknowledgement. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
The Republic of Haiti. 1995. Rapport de la Commission Nationale de Vérité et de Justice. Port-au-Prince: Government of Haiti.Google Scholar
Furtado, Henrique. 2017. On Demons and Dreamers: Violence, Silence and the Politics of Impunity in the Brazilian Truth Commission. Security Dialogue, 48(4): 316333.Google Scholar
Hollanda, Cristina Buarque de. 2018. Brazil Truth Commissions as Experiments of Representation: Between Impartiality and Proximity. Representation. Journal of Representative Democracy, 5(3): 323337.Google Scholar
Mezzaroba, Glenda. 2015. Lies Engraved on Marble and Truths Lost Forever. Sur. Revista Internacional de Direitos Humanos, 12(21): 15.Google Scholar
Mezzaroba, Glenda. 2016. Brazil: The Tortuous Path to Truth and Justice. In Transitional Justice in Latin America: The Uneven Road from Impunity towards Accountability. Ed. Skaar, Elin, Garcia-Godos, Jemima, and Collins, Cath. New York: Routledge. Vol. 1. pp. 103125.Google Scholar
Mezzarobba, Glenda and Jr, Roberto César. 2016. Notes from the Field: The Role of Datasets in Transitional Justice Research: The Case of Brazilian Truth Commission. Transitional Justice Review, 1(4): 263282.Google Scholar
Schneider, Nina, ed. 2019. The Brazilian Truth Commission: Local, National and Global Perspectives. New York/Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Clarke, Janine. 2010. Unity and Reconciliation in Rwanda: A Flawed Approach? Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 28(2): 137154.Google Scholar
Thomson, Susan. 2013. Whispering Truth to Power: Everyday Resistance to Reconciliation in Post-genocide Rwanda. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Uwimbabazi, Penine, Hajayandi, Patrick, and de Dieu Basabose, Jean. 2014. Forums for Reconciliation in Rwanda: Challenges and Opportunities. The Institute for Justice and Reconciliation, Policy Brief No. 17.Google Scholar
Williamson, Caroline. 2016. Genocide, Masculinity and Post-Traumatic Growth in Rwanda: Reconstructing Male Identity through ndi umunyarwanda. Journal of Genocide Research, 18(1): 4159.Google Scholar
Act 553/2002 Coll., of August 19th, 2002, on Disclosure of Documents Regarding the Activity of State Security Authorities in the Period 1939–1989 and on Founding the Nation’s Memory Institute (Ústav pamäti národa) and on Amending Certain Acts. Official English translation PDF available at: www.upn.gov.sk/en/act-no--5532002-coll-/, accessed on June 7, 2019.Google Scholar
Cuprik, Roman. 2017. Political Prisoners Are Against Memory Institute Reform. Slovak Spectator. 6 June. Available at: https://spectator.sme.sk/c/20550682/political-prisoners-are-against-memory-institute-reform.html, accessed on June 7, 2019.Google Scholar
Lesná, Ľuba. 2007. ŠtB Archives Still Hot Topic. Slovak Spectator. May 21. Available at: www.spectator.sk/articles/view/27692/2/, accessed on June 7, 2019.Google Scholar
Nedelsky, Nadya. 2009. Czechoslovakia, and the Czech and Slovak Republics. In Transitional Justice in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union: Reckoning with the Communist Past. Ed. Stan, Lavinia. New York: Routledge, pp. 3775.Google Scholar
Nedelsky, Nadya. 2016. “The Struggle for the Memory of the Nation”: Post-Communist Slovakia and Its World War II Past. Human Rights Quarterly, 38(4): 969992.Google Scholar
Spectator Staff. 2017. MPs Propose Changes to the Management of Nation’s Memory Institute. Slovak Spectator. May 29. Available at: https://spectator.sme.sk/c/20545258/mps-propose-changes-to-the-managment-of-nations-memory-institute.html, accessed on June 7, 2019.Google Scholar
Ward, James Mace. 2013. Priest, Politician, Collaborator: Jozef Tiso and the Making of Fascist Slovakia. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Kieran. 2001. The StB in Czechoslovakia, 1945–89. In Security Intelligence Services in New Democracies: The Czech Republic, Slovakia and Romania. Ed. Williams, Kieran and Deletant, Dennis. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Charter of the International Military Tribunal. Available at: http://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/imtconst.asp#art6, accessed on July 30, 2010.Google Scholar
Foreign Relations of the United States: The Conference at Quebec, 1944. Washington DC: Government Printing Office, 1972.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Martin. 1986. Winston S. Churchill, 1874–1965. Vol. 7: Road to Victory, 1941–1945. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
International Military Tribunal, 1947–1949. Trial of the Major War Criminals before the International Military Tribunal, Nuremberg, 14 November 1945–1 October 1946 (Blue Series). Nuremberg: International Military Tribunal.Google Scholar
Jackson, Robert H. 1949. Report of Robert H. Jackson, United States Representative to the International Conference on Military Trials, London, 1945. Washington DC: United States Department of State.Google Scholar
Merritt, Anna J. and Merritt, Richard L., eds. 1980. Public Opinion in Occupied Germany: The HICOG Surveys, 1949–1955. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Nuremberg Military Tribunals, 1949–1953. Trials of War Criminals before Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10 (Green Series). Washington: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Smith, Bradley F. 1982. The American Road to Nuremberg: The Documentary Record, 1944–1945. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Telford. 1949. Final Report to the Secretary of the Army on the Nuremberg War Crimes Trials under Control Council Law No. 10. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Baroch, Pavel. 2008. 1968 Invasion Conspirators: All Unpunished but One. Aktualne.cz. Available at: http://aktualne.centrum.cz/czechnews/clanek.phtml?id=614468, accessed on January 14, 2010.Google Scholar
Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic. 2008. Decision on the Institute for Study of Totalitarian Regimes. Pl. ÚS 25/07. March 13.Google Scholar
CzechNews. 2008. It Is Over. No More Lawsuits with Communist Criminals. Aktualne.cz. September 17. Available at: http://aktualne.centrum.cz/czechnews/clanek.phtml?id=616702, accessed on January 14, 2010.Google Scholar
CzechNews. 2008. President Klaus Rejects Pardon for Communist Prosecutor. Aktualne.cz. September 23. Available at: http://aktualne.centrum.cz/czechnews/clanek.phtml?id=617363, accessed on January 14, 2010.Google Scholar
David, Roman. 2018. Communists and Their Victims: The Quest for Justice in the Czech Republic. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Gazdík, Jan. 2009. Stát selhal při stíhání zločinců z 50. let, bilancují historici [The State Failed in Prosecution of Crimes of the 1950s, Historians Recapitulate]. iDnes.cz. August 31. Available at: http://zpravy.idnes.cz/stat-selhal-pri-stihani-zlocincu-z-50-let-bilancuji-historici-prj-/domaci.asp?c=A090830_224338_domaci_anv, accessed on January 14, 2010.Google Scholar
Nedelsky, Nadya. 2009. Czechoslovakia, and the Czech and Slovak Republics. In Transitional Justice in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union: Reckoning with the Communist Past. Ed. Stan, Lavinia. London: Routledge, pp. 3775.Google Scholar
Office of the Documentation and Investigation of Crimes of Communism of the Service of Crime Bureau of the Police. Official website. Available at: www.policie.cz/clanek/urad-dokumentace-a-vysetrovani-zlocinu-komunismu-679905.aspx, accessed on September 30, 2018.Google Scholar
Act Regarding the Records of the State Security Service of the Former German Democratic Republic. 1991. December 20. Federal Law Gazette, I: 2272.Google Scholar
Danielson, Elena S. 2004. Privacy Rights and the Rights of Political Victims: Implications of the German Experience. American Archivist, 67(2): 176193.Google Scholar
Geiger, Hansjörg. 1993. Zur Entstehung der Behörde des Bundesbeauftragten und des Stasi-Unterlagengesetzes [How the Office of the Commissioner of the Stasi Files Was Established]. In Wann bricht schon mal ein Staat zusammen. Ed. Henke, Klaus-Dieter. Munich: DVA Deutsche Verlagsanstalt, pp. 1247.Google Scholar
Maddrell, Paul. 2004. The Revolution Made Law: The Work since 2001 of the Federal Commissioner for the Records of the State Security Service of the Former German Democratic Republic. Cold War History, 4(3): 153162.Google Scholar
Markovits, Inga. 2001. Selective Memory: How the Law Affects What We Remember and Forget about the Past – The Case of East Germany. Law & Society Review, 35: 513.Google Scholar
Office of the Federal Commissioner Preserving the Records of the State Security Service of the Former German Democratic Republic. 2019. The Future of the Stasi Records. September 26. Available at: www.bstu.de/assets/bstu/en/Downloads/Agency_Future-of-the-Stasi-records_en.pdf, accessed on December 14, 2019.Google Scholar
Schumann, Silke. 1995. Vernichten oder Offenlegen? Zur Entstehung des Stasi-Unterlagengesetzes. Eine Dokumentation der öffentlichen Debatte 1990/91 [Destroy or Publish? How the Law on Stasi-files Emerged. A Documentation of the Public Debate]. Berlin: Eigenpublikation der BStU.Google Scholar
Gómez Isa, Felipe. 2008. Paramilitary Demobilization in Colombia: Between Peace and Justice. Working Paper 57. Madrid: Fundación para las Relaciones Internacionales y el Diálogo Exterior.Google Scholar
Hennebel, Ludo. 2009. The Inter-American System for Human Rights: Operation and Achievements. In International Human Rights Law in a Global Context. Ed. Gómez Isa, Felipe and de Feyter, Koen. Bilbao: Deusto University Press, pp. 805852.Google Scholar
Inksater, Kimberley and Jiménez, Paola. 2016. The Organization of American States Mission to Support the Peace Process in Colombia. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.Google Scholar
Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. 2007. Inter-American Commission on Human Rights Follow-Up on the Demobilization Process of the AUC in Colombia. OEA/Ser.L/V/II/CIDH/INF.2/07.Google Scholar
Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. 2008. Principal Guidelines for a Comprehensive Reparations Policy. OEA/Ser/L/V/II.131.Doc.1, February 19.Google Scholar
Inter-American Court on Human Rights. 1988. Velasquez Rodríguez v. Honduras Case. Decision. July 29. Series C, no. 4.Google Scholar
Inter-American Court on Human Rights. 2001. Barrios Altos (Chumbipuma Aguirre and others v. Peru) Case. Decision. March 14. Series C, no. 75.Google Scholar
Inter-American Court on Human Rights. 2002. Bámaca-Velásquez v. Guatemala Case. Decision. February 22. Series C, no. 91.Google Scholar
Inter-American Court on Human Rights. 2003. Myrna Mack Chang v. Guatemala Case. Decision. November 25. Series C, no. 101.Google Scholar
Inter-American Court on Human Rights. 2004. Plan de Sánchez Massacre v. Guatemala Case. Decision. April 29. Series C, no. 105.Google Scholar
Inter-American Court on Human Rights. 2005. Mapiripán Massacre v. Colombia Case. Decision. March 7. Series C, no. 122.Google Scholar
Inter-American Court on Human Rights. 2006. Pueblo Bello Massacre v. Colombia Case. Decision. January 31. Series C, no. 140.Google Scholar
Inter-American Court on Human Rights. 2007. The Rochela Massacre v. Colombia Case. Decision. May 11. Series C, no. 163.Google Scholar
Inter-American Court on Human Rights. 2009. “Las Dos Erres” Massacre v. Guatemala Case. Decision. November 24. Series C, no. 211.Google Scholar
Madrigal-Borloz, Víctor. 2003. Damage and Redress in the Jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. In Reparations: Redressing Past Wrongs. Ed. Ulrich, George and Krabbe, Louise. Boserup. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, pp. 211274.Google Scholar
Permanent Council of the OAS. 2017. Twenty-Second Report of the Secretary General to the Permanent Council on the Organization of American States Mission to Support the Peace Process in Colombia (MAPP/OAS). OEA/Ser.G/CP/doc.5289/17. March 29, 2017.Google Scholar
National Direction for Truth, Justice and Reparation. 2012. Informe de cumplimiento de las recomendaciones de la Comisión de Verdad y Justicia [Truth and Justice Commission, Recommendation Fulfilment Report]. Asunción: Print Service.Google Scholar
Truth and Justice Commission. 2008. Anive Haguä Oiko [Final Report]. Asunción: Ed. Truth and Justice Commission.Google Scholar
Barahona de Brito, Alexandra. 1997. Human Rights and Democratization in Latin America: Uruguay and Chile. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barahona de Brito, Alexandra. 2001. Truth, Justice, Memory, and Democratization in the Southern Cone. In The Politics of Memory: Transitional Justice in Democratizing Societies. Ed. de Brito, Alexandra Barahona, González-Enríquez, Carmen, and Aguilar, Paloma. Oxford University Press, pp. 119160.Google Scholar
Historical Investigation on Enforced Disappearances and Political Executions. 2015. Report. Montevideo: Secretariat for Human Rights of the Recent Past. Available at: http://sdh.gub.uy/inicio/institucional/equipos/centro_de_documentacion_y_comunicacion/documentos_equipo_historia/Investigacion+historica+sobre+detenidos+desaparecidos+y+asesinados+politicos+%28actualizacion+2015-febrero%29/, accessed on April 27, 2018.Google Scholar
Parliamentary Investigative Commission. 1985a. Interim Report. In Chamber of Representatives Diary of Sessions, 620. Montevideo: Library of the Legislature, pp. 511512.Google Scholar
Parliamentary Investigative Commission. 1985b. Final Report. In Chamber of Representatives Diary of Sessions, 620. Montevideo: Library of the Legislature, pp. 513517.Google Scholar
Parliamentary Pre-Investigative Commission. 1985. Report. In Chamber of Representatives Diary of Sessions, 617. Montevideo: Library of the Legislature, pp. 5963.Google Scholar
Barahona de Brito, Alexandra. 1997. Human Rights and Democratization in Latin America. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bickford, Louis. 2000. Human Rights Archives and Research on Historical Memory: Argentina, Chile. Uruguay. Latin American Research Review, 35(2): 160181.Google Scholar
Díaz, José Pedro. 1992. The Silences of Culture. In Repression, Exile and Democracy: Uruguayan Culture. Ed. Sosnowski, Saúl and Popkin, Louise B.. Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 196212.Google Scholar
El Servicio Paz y Justicia. Official website. Available at: www.serpaj.org.uy/serpajph/, accessed on September 14, 2010.Google Scholar
Lessa, Francesca. 2013 Memory and Transitional Justice in Argentina and Uruguay: Against Impunity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Loveman, L. 1998. High Risk Collective Action: Defending Human Rights in Chile, Uruguay and Argentina. The American Journal of Sociology, 104(2): 933.Google Scholar
Macarena, Gelman. 2011. Law Report. ABC Radio National. April 26. Available at: www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/lawreport/macarena-gelman/3005738, accessed on September 25, 2018.Google Scholar
Pagnucco, R. and McCarthy, J. D.. 1999. Antecedents and Emergence of SERPAJ. In Nonviolent Social Movements: A Geographical Perspective. Ed. Zunes, S., Kurtz, L. R., and Asher, S. B.. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 235258.Google Scholar
SERPAJ-Uruguay. 1992. Uruguay Nunca Más: Human Rights Violations, 1972–1985. Trans. Elizabeth Hampsten. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Allier, Eugenia. 2006. The Peace Commission: A Consensus on the Recent Past in Uruguay? European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies, 81: 8796.Google Scholar
Commission for Peace. 2003. Final Report. April 10. Available at: www.usip.org/sites/default/files/file/resources/collections/commissions/Uruguay-Report_Informal.pdf, accessed on September 12, 2018.Google Scholar
Decree 146/003. 2003. April 16. Available at: www.presidencia.gub.uy/decretos/2003041605.htm, accessed on March 10, 2010.Google Scholar
Dutrénit-Bielous, Silvia and Varela-Petito, Gonzalo. 2006. Esclarecimiento del pasado e intervención de la justicia: Conflicto y cambio de las historias oficiales [Elucidation of the Past and the Intervention of Justice: Conflict and Change in Official Histories]. In Sujetos sociales y nuevas formas de protesta en la historia reciente de América Latina [Social Subjects and New Forms of Protest in the Recent History of Latin America]. Ed. Caetano, Gerardo. Buenos Aires: Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales, pp. 331357.Google Scholar
Historical Investigation on Enforced Disappearances and Political Executions. 2015. Report. Secretariat for Human Rights of the Recent Past. Available at: http://sdh.gub.uy/inicio/institucional/equipos/centro_de_documentacion_y_comunicacion/documentos_equipo_historia/Investigacion+historica+sobre+detenidos+desaparecidos+y+asesinados+politicos+%28actualizacion+2015-febrero%29/, accessed on April 27, 2018.Google Scholar
Resolution 448/2003. April 10, 2003. Available at: www.presidencia.gub.uy/resoluciones/2003041143.htm, accessed on March 10, 2010.Google Scholar
Resolution 858/2000. August 9, 2000. Available at: www.presidencia.gub.uy/noticias/archivo/2000/agosto/2000080912.htm, accessed on March 2, 2010.Google Scholar
Sempol, Diego. 2006. HIJOS Uruguay. Identidad, protesta social y memoria generacional [HIJOS Uruguay. Identity, Social Protest and Generational Memory]. In El Pasado en el Futuro: Los Movimientos Juveniles [The Past in the Future: The Youth Movements]. Ed. Jelin, Elizabeth and Sempol, Diego. Madrid: Siglo XXI Editores, pp. 185220.Google Scholar
Bacalu, Mihai. 2008. Raportul Tismăneanu le-a adus terenuri [The Tismaneanu Report Gave Them Land]. Adevarul. October 6. Available at: www.adevarul.ro/articole/raportul-tismaneanu-le-a-adus-terenuri.html, accessed on June 2, 2009.Google Scholar
Băsescu, Traian. 2006. The Speech given by the President of Romania, Traian Băsescu, on the occasion of the Presentation of the Report by the Presidential Commission for the Analysis of the Communist Dictatorship in Romania. Available at: www.roconsulboston.com/Pages/InfoPages/Commentary/Communism/BasescuSpeech.htm, accessed on August 3, 2022.Google Scholar
Cesereanu, Ruxandra. 2008. The Final Report on the Holocaust and the Final Report on the Communist Dictatorship in Romania. East European Politics and Societies, 22: 270281.Google Scholar
Ernu, Vasile, Rogozanu, Costi, Siulea, Ciprian, and Tichindeleanu, Ovidiu. 2008. Iluzia anticomunismului: Lecturi critice ale raportului Tismaneanu. Chisianu: Cartier.Google Scholar
Tanasoiu, Cosmina. 2007. The Tismaneanu Report: Romania Revisits Its Past. Problems of Post-Communism, 54: 6069.Google Scholar
Tismaneanu, Vladimir. 2003, Stalinism for All Seasons: A Political History of Romanian Communism. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tismaneanu, Vladimir. 2008. Democracy and Memory: Romania Confronts Its Communist Past. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 617: 166180.Google Scholar
Tismaneanu, Vladimir, Dobrincu, Dorin, and Vasile, Cristian, eds. 2007. Raport Final. Bucharest: Humanitas.Google Scholar
Vasile, Cristian. 2009. Le Rapport Final de la Commission pour l’analyse de la dictature communiste et ses critiques. Historical Yearbook, 6: 7780.Google Scholar
Economic and Social Council. 1999. Report of the Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances Addendum Report on the visit to Sri Lanka by a member of the Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances (25–29 October 1999). E/CN.4/2000/64/Add.1, December 21.Google Scholar
Presidential Commission of Inquiry into Involuntary Removal and Disappearance of Certain Persons (All Island). 2001. Final Report of the Commission of Inquiry into Involuntary Removal or Disappearance of Certain Persons (All Island), Volume I. Sessional Paper No. I. Colombo: Department of Government Printing.Google Scholar
Thomson, Jane. 2011. Waiting in the Dark. The Sociology of Enforced Disappearance in Sri Lanka. PhD dissertation, University of Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
Presidential Commission of Inquiry into the Involuntary Removal or Disappearance of Persons in the Central, North Western, North Central and Uva Provinces. 1997. Final Report of the Commission of Inquiry into the Involuntary Removal or Disappearance of Persons in the Central, North Western, North Central and Uva Provinces. Part I. Sessional Paper No. VI. Colombo: Department of Government Printing.Google Scholar
Presidential Commission of Inquiry into the Involuntary Removal or Disappearance of Persons in the Northern and Eastern Province. 1997. Final Report of the Commission of Inquiry into the Involuntary Removal or Disappearance of Persons in the Northern and Eastern Provinces. Sessional Paper No. VII. Colombo: Department of Government Printing.Google Scholar
Presidential Commission of Inquiry into the Involuntary Removal or Disappearance of Persons in the Western, Southern and Sabaragamuwa Provinces. 1997. Final Report of the Commission of Inquiry into the Involuntary Removal or Disappearance of Persons in the Western, Southern and Sabaragamuwa Provinces. Sessional Paper No. V. Colombo: Department of Government Printing.Google Scholar
Presidential Truth Commission on Suspicious Deaths. 2004. A Hard Journey to Justice: First Term Report by the Presidential Truth Commission on Suspicious Deaths of the Republic of Korea. Seoul: Samin Books.Google Scholar
Tsche, Kwang-Jun, ed. 2009. Human Rights in Korea: Activities and Results of the Presidential Truth Commission on Suspicious Deaths. Seoul: Kyung Hee University Press.Google Scholar
United States Institute of Peace. Truth Commission: South Korea. 2009. Available at: www.usip.org/publications/2000/10/truth-commission-south-korea-2000, accessed on August 29, 2018.Google Scholar
Kerr, Rachel and Mobekk, Eirin. 2007. Peace and Justice: Seeking Accountability after War. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Reiger, Caitlin and Wierda, Marieke. 2006. The Serious Crimes Process in Timor-Leste: In Retrospect. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. Available at: www.ictj.org/publication/serious-crimes-process-timor-leste-retrospect, accessed on August 2, 2022.Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly. 1999. Situation of Human Rights in East Timor. December 10. Available at: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/404721?ln=en#record-files-collapse-header, accessed on August 2, 2022.Google Scholar
United Nations Security Council. 1999. Resolution 1272 on East Timor. October 25. Available at: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/291410?ln=en, accessed on August 2, 2022.Google Scholar
UNTAED. 2000. Regulation 2000/11 on the Organization of Courts in East Timor. March 6. Available at: www.legal-tools.org/doc/2bedb8/pdf, accessed on August 2, 2022.Google Scholar
UNTAED. 2000. Regulation 2000/15 on the Establishment of Panels with Exclusive Jurisdiction over Serious Criminal Offences. June 6. Available at: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/c082f8/pdf, accessed on August 2, 2022.Google Scholar
UNTAED. 2000. Regulation 2000/16 on the Organization of the Public Prosecution Service in East Timor. June 6. Available at: http://mj.gov.tl/jornal/lawsTL/UNTAET-Law/Regulations%20English/Reg2000-16.pdf, accessed on August 2, 2022.Google Scholar
Ambrosewics, Jolanta and Yung, Chunlou. 2001. What Is in the Way? Teaching about the Holocaust in Post-1989 Poland. In Remembering for the Future: The Holocaust in an Age of Genocide. Vol. 3. Ed. Levy, Margot. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Bascomb, Neal. 2009. Hunting Eichmann. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
Bickford, Louis. 2004. Encyclopedia of Genocide and Crimes against Humanity. New York: Macmillian.Google Scholar
Cooper, Abraham. 1999. Wiesenthal Center. In Encyclopedia of Genocide. Ed. Charney, Israel W. Jerusalem: Institute on the Holocaust and Genocide.Google Scholar
Cooper, Abraham. 1999. Beit Hashoah/Museum of Tolerance of the Simon Wiesenthal Center. In Encyclopedia of Genocide. Ed. Charney, Israel W. Jerusalem: Institute on the Holocaust and Genocide.Google Scholar
Crowe, David. 2007. The Holocaust: Roots, History, and Aftermath. Philadelphia: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Simon Wiesenthal Center. Official website. Available at: www.wiesenthal.com/site/pp.asp?c=lsKWLbPJLnF&b=4441251, accessed on January 15, 2010.Google Scholar
Wiesenthal, Simon. 1967. The Murderers Among Us. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Wiesenthal, Simon. 1976. The Sunflower. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
Case of Gomes Lund et al. (“Guerrilha do Araguaia”) v. Brazil, IACtHR, Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations, and Costs. Judgment. of November 24, 2010, Series C No. 219. Available at: http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_219_ing.pdf, accessed on December 29, 2018.Google Scholar
Comissão Especial sobre Mortos e Desaparecidos Políticos [Special Commission on the Dead and Disappeared for Political Reasons]. 2007. Direito à Memória e à Verdade [The Right to Truth and Memory: Special Commission on the Dead and Disappeared for Political Reasons]. Brasília: Special Human Rights Department of the Presidency. Available at: www.mdh.gov.br/biblioteca/memoria-e-verdade/direito-a-memoria-e-a-verdade-2013-comissao-especial-sobre-mortos-e-desaparecidos-politicos/view, accessed on August 17, 2019.Google Scholar
Comissão de Familiares de Mortos e Desaparecidos Políticos [Committee of Family Members of the Dead and Disappeared for Political Reasons]. 2009. Dossiê Ditadura: mortos e desaparecidos politicos no Brasil (1964–1985) [Dictatorship Dossier: The Dead and Disappeared for Political Reasons in Brazil (1964–1985)] São Paulo: Official Press of the State of São Paulo.Google Scholar
Desaparecidos Políticos [The Disappeared for Political Reasons]. No date. Available at: www.desaparecidospoliticos.org.br/, accessed on December 29, 2018.Google Scholar
Mezarobba, Glenda. 2016. Brazil: The Tortuous Path to Truth and Justice. In Transitional Justice in Latin America: The Uneven Road from Impunity towards Accountability. Ed. Skaar, Elin, García-Godos, Jemima, and Collins, Cath. New York: Routledge, pp. 103125.Google Scholar
Cruvellier, Thierry. 2009. From the Taylor Trial to a Lasting Legacy: Putting the Special Court Model to the Test. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice and Sierra Leone Court Monitoring Program.Google Scholar
Dougherty, Beth K. 2004. Right-Sizing International Criminal Justice: The Hybrid Experiment at the Special Court for Sierra Leone. International Affairs, 80(2): 311328.Google Scholar
Kelsall, Michelle Staggs and Stepakoff, Shanee. 2007. “When We Wanted to Talk about Rape”: Silencing Sexual Violence at the Special Court for Sierra Leone. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 1(3): 355374.Google Scholar
Special Court for Sierra Leone. Official website. Available at: www.rscsl.org/, accessed on August 2, 2022.Google Scholar
Sriram, Chandra Lekha. 2006. Wrong-Sizing International Justice? The Hybrid Tribunal in Sierra Leone. Fordham International Law Journal, 29(3): 472506.Google Scholar
Semerzhiev, Atanas. 1999. Prezhivianoto ne podlezhi na obzhalvane [The Lived-through Experience Cannot Be Appealed]. Sofia: Hristo Botev.Google Scholar
Skochev, Borislav. 2017. Kontzlagerut Belene. Ostrovut koito ubi svobodniat chovek, 1949–1987 [The Belene Concentration Camp. The Island that Destroyed the Free Person, 1949–1987]. Sofia: Ciela.Google Scholar
Todorov, Tzvetan. 1999. Voices from the Gulag: Life and Death in Communist Bulgaria. Trans. Robert Zaretsky. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Topouzova, Lilia. Unpublished book manuscript. Reclaiming Memory: The History & Legacy of the Bulgarian Gulag.Google Scholar
Brammertz, Serge. 2007. Ninth report of the International Independent Investigation Commission established pursuant to Security Council Resolutions 1595 (2005), 1636 (2005), 1644 (2005), 1686 (2006) and 1748 (2007), S/2007/684. United Nations Security Council. November 28. Available at: www.stl-tsl.org/en/documents/un-documents/reports-of-the-uniiic/237-9th-report-of-the-international-independent-investigation-commission, accessed on September 20, 2018.Google Scholar
Gaeta, Paola. 2014. Trial in Absentia before the Special Tribunal for Lebanon. In The Special Tribunal for Lebanon [electronic resource]: Law and Practice. Ed. Alamuddin, A., Jurdi, N. N., and Tolbert, D.. Oxford University Press. Available at: http://academic.oup.com/book/2232/chapter-abstract/142316267?redirectedFrom=fulltext, accessed on August 3, 2022.Google Scholar
Haugbolle, Sune. 2005. Public and Private Memory of the Lebanese Civil War. Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East, 25(1): 191203.Google Scholar
Hebab, Habib and Loveluck, Louisa. 2017. A Syrian Soldier Has Been Sentenced for Battlefield Crimes. Why Did It Take So Long? The Washington Post. October 1.Google Scholar
Milanovic, Marko. 2007. An Odd Couple: Domestic Crimes and International Responsibility in the Special Tribunal for Lebanon. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 5(5): 11391152.Google Scholar
Shehadi, Nadim and Wilmshurst, Elizabeth. 2007. The Special Tribunal for Lebanon: The UN on Trial? Middle East/International Law Briefing Paper, Chatham House, MEP/IL BP 07/01.Google Scholar
Special Tribunal for Lebanon. Official website. Available at: www.stl-tsl.org/, accessed on October 10, 2010.Google Scholar
Cvetković, Srđan. 2006. Između srpa i čekića. Likvidacija narodnih neprijatelja 1944–1953 [Between the Hammer and Sickle. Liquidation of the Enemies of the People 1944–1953]. Beograd: Institut za savremenu istoriju.Google Scholar
Cvetković, Srđan. 2010. Godišnji izveštaj (2010) Državne komisije za pronalaženje i obeležavanje svih tajnih grobnica u kojima se nalaze posmrtni ostaci streljanih posle oslobođenja 1944 [Annual Report (2010) of the State Commission for Discovery and Memorialization of Secret Mass Graves of Persons Executed after Liberation in 1944]. Available at: www.komisija1944.mpravde.gov.rs/images/Godisnji%20izvestaj%20cela.pdf, accessed on November 12, 2018.Google Scholar
Cvetković, Srđan. 2011. Godišnji izveštaj (2011) Državne komisije za pronalaženje i obeležavanje svih tajnih grobnica u kojima se nalaze posmrtni ostaci streljanih posle oslobođenja 1944 [Annual Report (2011) of the State Commission for Discovery and Memorialization of Secret Mass Graves of Persons Executed after Liberation in 1944], available at http://komisija1944.mpravde.gov.rs/lt/articles/aktivnosti/godisnji-izvestaj-2011..html, accessed on November 12, 2018.Google Scholar
Otvorena knjiga žrtava [Open Book of Victims], no date. Available at: www.otvorenaknjiga.komisija1944.mpravde.gov.rs/, accessed on November 12, 2018.Google Scholar
Petrović, Vladimir. 2007. (Ne)legitimni revizionizam: pravo i (pseudo)istoriografske revizije na zapadu i istoku [(Il)legitimate Revisionism: The Law and (Pseudo-)Historical Revisions in the West and in the East]. In Revizija prošlosti na prostorima bivše Jugoslavije [Revisions of the Past in the Post-Yugoslav Space]. Ed. Katz, Vera. Sarajevo: Institut za istoriju.Google Scholar
Portmann, Michael. 2004. Communist Retaliation and Persecution on Yugoslav Territory during and after World War II. Tokovi istorije, 1(2): 4574.Google Scholar
Radanović, Milan. 2015. Kazna i zločin. Snage kolaboracije u Srbiji [Punishment and Crime. Collaborationist Forces in Serbia]. Beograd: Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung.Google Scholar
Salo, Vello et al., eds. 2005. The White Book: Losses Inflicted on the Estonian Nation by Occupation Regimes 1940–1991. Tallinn: Estonian Encyclopedia Publishers. Available at: www.riigikogu.ee/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/TheWhiteBook.pdf (accessed on February 26, 2018).Google Scholar
Apology to Former Students of Indian Residential Schools. Ottawa: House of Commons Debates. Vol. 142, no. 110. 2nd Session. 39th Parliament. Available at: www2.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?DocId=3568890&Language=E&Mode=1&Parl=39&Ses=2, accessed on December 14, 2019.Google Scholar
Castellano, Marlene, Archibald, Linda, and DeGagne, Mike, eds. 2008. From Truth to Reconciliation: Transforming the Legacy of Residential Schools. Ottawa: Aboriginal Healing Foundation.Google Scholar
Indian Residential Schools Settlement Agreement and Annexures. Available at: www.residentialschoolsettlement.ca, accessed on December 14, 2019.Google Scholar
Milloy, John. 1999. A National Crime: The Canadian Government and the Residential School System – 1879 to 1986. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.Google Scholar
Report of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal People. 1996. Ottawa: The Royal Commission on Aboriginal People.Google Scholar
Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. 2015. Honouring the Truth, Reconciling for the Future: Summary of the Final Report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. Available at: https://irsi.ubc.ca/sites/default/files/inline-files/Executive_Summary_English_Web.pdf, accessed on August 3, 2022.Google Scholar
Commission Vérité et Réconciliation. 2003. Rapport des travaux. Bangui: Dialogue National. Available at: http://dialogue.national.free.fr/dn_accueil.htm, accessed on November 30, 2018.Google Scholar
Fédération Internationale des Droits de l’Homme. 2004. Quelle justice pour les victimes de crimes de guerre? Paris: Fédération Internationale des Droits de l’Homme.Google Scholar
Integrated Regional Information Network. 2003. Central African Republic: Reconciliation Commission Recommends Government Shakeup. Bangui: IRIN News. Available at: www.irinnews.org/report.aspx?reportid=46541, accessed on November 30, 2018.Google Scholar
Radio France Internationale. 2003. Au-delà du dialogue, les présidentielles. Bangui: RFI. Available at: www1.rfi.fr/actufr/articles/046/article_25402.asp, accessed on November 30, 2018.Google Scholar
Smith, Stephen W. 2015. CAR’s History. In Making Sense of the Central African Republic. Ed. Carayannis, Tatiana and Lombard, Louisa. London: Zed Books, pp. 1752.Google Scholar
Act That Established the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) of Liberia. May 12, 2005. Available at: http://www.trcofliberia.org (accessed November 3, 2009).Google Scholar
Amnesty International. 2006. Liberia: Truth, Justice and Reparation – Memorandum on the Truth and Reconciliation Commission Act. AI Index: AFR 34/005/2006.Google Scholar
Amnesty International. 2008. Liberia: Towards the Final Phase of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission. AI Index AFR 34/002/2008.Google Scholar
Gberie, Lansana. 2008. Truth and Justice on Trial in Liberia. African Affairs, 107: 455465.Google Scholar
Hayner, Priscilla. 2007. Negotiating Peace in Liberia: Preserving the Possibility for Justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice. Available at: http://www.ictj.org/static/Africa/Liberia/HaynerLiberia1207.eng.pdf (accessed November 3, 2009).Google Scholar
Johnson Sirleaf, Ellen. 2010. Annual Message to the Fifth Session of the 52nd National Legislature of the Republic of Liberia, January 25.Google Scholar
Republic of Liberia Truth and Reconciliation Commission. 2009. Final Report. Available at: https://www.trcofliberia.org/reports/final (accessed November 3, 2009).Google Scholar
Weah, Aaron, Samuel, Toe, and Aaron, Sleh. 2008. Impunity under Attack: The Evolution and Imperatives of the Liberian Truth Commission. Monrovia: Civic Initiative.Google Scholar
Comisión de la Verdad y Reconciliación (Peru). 2004. Informe Final. 9 vols. Lima: Universidad Nacional Mayor San Marcos and Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.Google Scholar
Gonzalez Cueva, Eduardo. 2006. The Peruvian Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the challenge of impunity. In Transitional Justice in the Twenty-First Century: Beyond Truth Versus Justice. Ed. Roht-Arriaza, Naomi and Mariezcurrena, Javier. New York: Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gorriti, Gustavo. 1999. The Shining Path: A History of the Millenarian War in Peru. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.Google Scholar
Laplante, Lisa. 2007. Entwined Paths to Justice: The Inter-American Human Rights System and the Peruvian Truth Commission. In Paths to International Justice: Social and Legal Perspectives. Ed. Dembour, Marie-Bénédicte and Kelly, Tobias. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Laplante, Lisa and Theidon, Kimberly. 2007. Truth with Consequences: Justice and Reparations in Post-Truth Commission Peru. Human Rights Quarterly, 29(1): 228250.Google Scholar
Youngers, Coletta. 2003. Violencia Política y Sociedad Civil en el Perú: Historia de la Coordinadora Nacional de Derechos Humanos [Political Violence and Civil Society in Peru: History of the Nacional Coordinator of Human Rights]. Lima, Peru: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
Kim, Hunjoon. 2014. Transitional Justice in South Korea. In Transitional Justice in the Asia-Pacific. Ed. Jeffery, Renee and Kim, Hunjoon. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Truth and Reconciliation Commission, Republic of Korea. 2008. Truth and Reconciliation are Steps for the Future. Seoul: Truth and Reconciliation Commission, Republic of Korea.Google Scholar
Truth and Reconciliation Commission, Republic of Korea. 2009. Truth and Reconciliation: Activities of the Past Three Years. Seoul: Truth and Reconciliation Commission, Republic of Korea.Google Scholar
Ainley, K., Friedman, R., and Mahony, C., eds. 2015. Evaluating Transitional Justice: Accountability and Peacebuilding in Post-Conflict Sierra Leone. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Beah, I. 2007. A Long Way Gone. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Google Scholar
Ferme, M. C. 2018. Out of War: Violence, Trauma, and the Political Imagination in Sierra Leone. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gberie, L. 2005. A Dirty War in West Africa: The RUF and the Destruction of Sierra Leone. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Mitton, K. 2015. Rebels in a Rotten State: Understanding Atrocity in the Sierra Leone Civil War. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Sierra Leone. Official website. Available at: www.sierraleonetrc.org/, accessed on January 29, 2019.Google Scholar
Agreement between Solomon Islands, Australia, New Zealand, Fiji, Papua New Guinea, Samoa, and Tonga concerning the operations and status of the police and armed forces and other personnel deployed to Solomon Islands to assist in the restoration of law and order and security. 2003. Available at: www.parliament.gov.sb/files/committees/foreignrelations/agreement.pdf, accessed on September 21, 2019.Google Scholar
Amnesty International. 2009. Solomon Islands: Truth and Reconciliation Commission Cannot Work in Isolation. April 30. Available at: www.amnesty.org/download/Documents/48000/asa430012009en.pdf, accessed on September 21, 2019.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, J., Dinnen, S., Allen, M., Braithwaite, V., and Charlesworth, H.. 2010. Pillars and Shadows: Statebuilding as Peacebuilding in Solomon Islands. Canberra: Australian National University E-Press.Google Scholar
Corrin, Jennifer. 2008. Ples Bilong Mere: Law, Gender and Peace-Building in Solomon Islands. Feminist Legal Studies, 16(2): 169194.Google Scholar
Dinnen, Sinclair and Firth, Stewart., eds. 2008. Rebuilding the State in the Solomon Islands. Canberra: ANU Asia Pacific Press.Google Scholar
Halpern, J. and Weinstein, H.. 2004. Rehumanizing the Other: Empathy and Reconciliation. Human Rights Quarterly, 26: 561583.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, Renee. 2015. The Solomon Islands Truth and Reconciliation Commission Report: Forgiving the Perpetrators, Forgetting the Victims? Available at: https://ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProposal/984ba0fe-b399–44f7-ad25–4b439f6be296.pdf, accessed on September 21, 2019.Google Scholar
Solomon Islands Moves Closer to Establishing Truth and Reconciliation Commission. 2008. RNZ. September 4. Available at www.rnz.co.nz/international/pacific-news/179143/solomon-islands-moves-closer-to-establishing-truth-and-reconciliation-commission, accessed on August 3, 2022.Google Scholar
UNDP media release. 2009. Desmond Tutu Launches Commission to Restore Peace in Solomon Islands. April 28. Available at: https://news.un.org/en/story/2009/04/298312-nobel-laureate-launches-un-backed-truth-commission-solomon-islands, accessed on August 3, 2022.Google Scholar
Asmal, Kader. 1992. Victims, Survivors and Citizens – Human Rights, Reparations, and Reconciliation. Inaugural Lecture, University of the Western Cape, May 25.Google Scholar
AZAPO and Others v. President of the Republic of South Africa and Others, Constitutional Court, Case 17 of July 25, 1996. Available at: www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZACC/1996/16.html, accessed on May 30, 2018.Google Scholar
Doxtader, Erik. 2009. With Faith in the Works of Words: The Beginnings of Reconciliation in South Africa. Cape Town/Lansing, MI: David Philip/Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar
Omar, Dullah. 1995. Testimony Delivered to Parliament’s Joint Committee on Justice with Regards to the Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Bill, 31 January. Cape Town: Archives of Parliament.Google Scholar
Krog, Antjie. 1999. Country of My Skull: Guilt, Sorrow, and the Limits of Forgiveness in the New South Africa. New York: Times Books.Google Scholar
Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act 95-34. 1995. July 26. Available at: www.fas.org/irp/world/rsa/act95_034.htm, accessed on May 30, 2018.Google Scholar
Ross, Fiona C. 2003. Bearing Witness: Women and the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa. London, United Kingdom: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Swart, Mia and van Marle, Karin, eds. 2017. The Limits of Transition: The South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission 20 Years on. Nijhoff: Brill.Google Scholar
Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa. Official Website. Available at: www.justice.gov.za/trc/index.html, accessed on May 30, 2018.Google Scholar
Dimitrijević, Nenad. 2005. Coming to Terms with the Evil Past: Does Serbia and Montenegro Need a Truth Commission? In Between Authoritarianism and Democracy: Serbia, Montenegro, Croatia. Vol. 2. Ed. Vujadinović, Dragica, Veljak, Lino, Goati, Vladimir, and Pavićević, Veselin. Belgrade: CEDET, pp. 233252.Google Scholar
Dimitrijević, Vojin. 2002. Facts versus Truth: The Dilemmas of a Reluctant Member of a Truth and Reconciliation Commission. In Experiments with Truth: Transitional Justice and the Processes of Truth and Reconciliation. Document 11 Platform 2. Ed. Enwezor, Okwui, Basualdo, Carlos, Bauer, Ute Meta, Ghez, Susanne, Maharaj, Sarat, Nash, Mark, and Zaya, Octavio. Ostfildern-Ruit: Hatje Cantz, pp. 205213.Google Scholar
Freeman, Mark. 2004. Serbia and Montenegro: Selected Developments in Transitional Justice. Case Study Series. October. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice, p. 5. Available at: www.ictj.org/sites/default/files/ICTJ-FormerYugoslavia-Serbia-Developments-2004-English.pdf, accessed on May 26, 2018.Google Scholar
Ilić, Dejan. 2004. The Yugoslav Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Eurozine. Available at: www.eurozine.com/the-yugoslav-truth-and-reconciliation-commission/, accessed on May 26, 2018.Google Scholar
Pejić, Jelena. 2001. The Yugoslav Truth and Reconciliation Commission: A Shaky Start. Fordham International Law Journal, 25: 122.Google Scholar
Ambos, Kai. 2008. El marco jurídicio de la justicia de transición [The Legal Framework of Transitional Justice]. Bogotá: Temis.Google Scholar
Consejo Nacional de la Judicatura. 2018. Mesa por la Verdad y la Justicia, Perseguidos Políticos Nunca Más, pidió inicio de investigaciones a 15 operadores de justicia. August 20. Available at: www.funcionjudicial-guayas.gob.ec/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1437:mesa-por-la-verdad-y-la-justicia-perseguidos-politicos-nunca-mas-pidio-inicio-de-investigaciones-a-15-operadores-de-justicia&catid=14:noticias-home, accessed on February 10, 2019.Google Scholar
Fiscalía General del Estado. 2014. Cinco sentenciados a 16 años de reclusión por asesinato en caso “González y otros.” November 6. Available at: www.fiscalia.gob.ec/cinco-sentenciados-a-16-anos-de-reclusion-por-asesinato-en-caso-gonzalez-y-otros/, accessed on February 10, 2019.Google Scholar
Mesa de la Verdad de Perseguidos Políticos, Nunca Más. 2018. Informe final [Final Report]. December. Available at: www.inredh.org/archivos/pdf/informe_mesa_justicia.pdf, accessed on March 20, 2019.Google Scholar
Chiriboga, Solís and Cristina, María. 2018. Reparación a víctimas de derechos humanos y crímenes de lesa humanidad en Ecuador. Íconos. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 62 (September): 183201.Google Scholar
Truth and Justice Commission. 1991. Report of the Truth and Justice Commission. November 2. Quito: Ecuadorian National Congress.Google Scholar
Truth Commission. 2010. Final Report of the Truth Commission, Executive Summary. Quito: Truth Commission.Google Scholar
Doggett, Martha. 1993. Death Foretold: The Jesuit Murders in El Salvador. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Lawyers’ Committee for Human Rights. 1995. Improvising History: A Critical Evaluation of the United Nations Observer Mission in El Salvador. New York: Lawyers’ Committee for Human Rights.Google Scholar
Panel Event: “The Uses of Truth: Truth Commission Archives, Justice, and the Search for the Disappeared in El Salvador” (Rapporteur Document V), April 23, 2018, proceedings of a panel organized at Cardozo Law School by Universidad Diego Portales, Ulster University, and the Due Process of Law Foundation. Available at: https://derechoshumanos.udp.cl/cms/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Relatoria_Va_Uses_of_Truth_El_Salvador_TC_archives_access_ENG.pdf, accessed on August 3, 2022.Google Scholar
Popkin, Margaret. 2000. Peace without Justice: Obstacles to Building the Rule of Law in El Salvador. University Park: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
UN Truth Commission for El Salvador. 1993. From Madness to Hope: The 12-Year War in El Salvador. UN Publication S/25500. Available at: www.usip.org/files/file/ElSalvador-Report.pdf, accessed on October 22, 2010.Google Scholar
US Secretary of State’s Panel on El Salvador. 1993. Report of the Secretary of State’s Panel on El Salvador. Washington DC: US Department of State.Google Scholar
Informe Final de la Comisión de la Verdad de Panamá [Final Report of the Panama Truth Commission – Original Spanish Language Version]. 2002. Available at: www.defensoria.gob.pa/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Informe-de-la-Comision-de-la-Verdad.pdf, accessed on August 3, 2022.Google Scholar
Dom Helder Câmara State Memory and Truth Commission. 2017. Final Report. 2 vols. Available at: www.comissaodaverdade.pe.gov.br/index.php/relatorio-final-2, accessed on June 8, 2019.Google Scholar
Dom Helder Câmara State Memory and Truth Commission. 2017. Fundo CEMVDHC [Data Repository]. Available at: www.comissaodaverdade.pe.gov.br/index.php/comissao-da-verdade, accessed on June 8, 2019.Google Scholar
Hollanda, Cristina Buarque de. 2018. Brazil Truth Commissions as Experiments of Representation: Between Impartiality and Proximity. Representation. Journal of Representative Democracy, 55(3): 323337.Google Scholar
Hollanda, Cristina Buarque de. 2019. Entrevista com Manoel Severino Moraes (CEMVDHC) [Interview with Manoel Severino Moraes de Almeida (former counselor of the Dom Helder Câmara State Memory and Truth Commission)]. figshare. Available at: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.8243123.v1, accessed on June 14, 2019.Google Scholar
Mezzaroba, Glenda. 2016. Brazil: The Tortuous Path to Truth and Justice. In Transitional Justice in Latin America: The Uneven Road from Impunity towards Accountability. Vol. 1. Ed. Skaar, Elin, Garcia-Godos, Jemima, and Collins, Cath. New York: Routledge, pp. 103125.Google Scholar
Comissão Estadual da Verdade do Rio de Janeiro [Rio de Janeiro Truth Commission]. 2015. Final Report. Available at: https://www.plural.jor.br/documentosrevelados/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/cev-rio-relatorio-final.pdf, accessed on 6 June 2019.Google Scholar
Hollanda, Cristina Buarque de. 2018. Brazilian Truth Commissions as Experiments of Representation: Between Impartiality and Proximity. Representation. Journal of Representative Democracy. DOI 10.1080/00344893.2018.1424029.Google Scholar
Mezarobba, Glenda. 2016. Brazil: The Tortuous Path to Truth and Justice. In Transitional Justice in Latin America. The Uneven Road from Impunity towards Accountability. Ed. Skaar, Elin, Garcia-Godos, Jemima, and Collins, Cath. New York: Routledge, pp. 103125.Google Scholar
Veja 10 frases polêmicas de Bolsonaro sobre o golpe de 1964 e a ditadura militar [See 10 controversial sentences from Bolsonaro about the military coup of 1964 and the military dictatorship]. 2019. Folha de São Paulo. March 28. Available at: www1.folha.uol.com.br/poder/2019/03/veja-10-frases-polemicas-de-bolsonaro-sobre-o-golpe-de-1964-e-a-ditadura-militar.shtml, accessed on June 6, 2019.Google Scholar
Azevedo, Desirée de Lemos. 2018. Ausências incorporadas. Etnografia entre familiares de mortos e desaparecidos políticos no Brasil [Embodied Absences. An Ethnography among Relatives of Victims of Assassinations and Disappearances of Political Nature in Brazil]. São Paulo: Editora Unifesp.Google Scholar
Comissão da verdade do estado de São Paulo Rubens Paiva [Rubens Paiva Truth Commission from the Legislative Assembly of the State of São Paulo]. 2015. Final Report. Available at: http://comissaodaverdade.al.sp.gov.br/, accessed on June 6, 2019.Google Scholar
Hollanda, Cristina Buarque de. 2018. Brazil Truth Commissions as Experiments of Representation: Between Impartiality and Proximity. Representation. Journal of Representative Democracy, 5(3): 323337.Google Scholar
Hollanda, Cristina Buarque de. 2019. Entrevista com Adriano Diogo (CEV Rubens Paiva, SP-SP) [Interview with Adriano Diogo (former counselor of the Rubens Paiva Truth Commission from the Legislative Assembly of the State of São Paulo)]. figshare. Available at: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.8230727.v2, accessed on June 14, 2019.Google Scholar
Mezzaroba, Glenda. 2016. Brazil: The Tortuous Path to Truth and Justice. In Transitional Justice in Latin America: The Uneven Road from Impunity towards Accountability. Vol. 1. Ed. Skaar, Elin, Garcia-Godos, Jemima, and Collins, Cath. New York: Routledge, pp. 103125.Google Scholar
Veja 10 frases polêmicas de Bolsonaro sobre o golpe de 1964 e a ditadura militar [See 10 Controversial Sentences from Bolsonaro about the Military Coup of 1964 and the Military Dictatorship]. 2019. Folha de São Paulo. March 28. Available at: www1.folha.uol.com.br/poder/2019/03/veja-10-frases-polemicas-de-bolsonaro-sobre-o-golpe-de-1964-e-a-ditadura-militar.shtml, accessed on June 6, 2019.Google Scholar
Nadin, Daniel. 2018. Truth on Trial: Unearthing the Legacy of the Nakba. The Politic. February 14. Available at: http://thepolitic.org/truth-on-trial-unearthing-the-legacy-of-the-nakba/, accessed on June 14, 2019.Google Scholar
Truth Commission on the Responsibility of Israeli Society for the Events of 1948–1960 in the South. 2015. Final Report – Truth Commission on the Nakba 1948–1960. Available at: https://zochrot.org/en/article/56371, accessed on June 14, 2019.Google Scholar
Government of Kenya. 2004. Report of the Commission of Inquiry into the Illegal/Irregular Allocation of Public Land. Nairobi: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Kenya Task Force on the Establishment of a Truth, Justice, and Reconciliation Commission. 2003. Report of the Task Force on the Establishment of a Truth, Justice, and Reconciliation Commission. Nairobi: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Lynch, Gabrielle. 2019. An Injustice in Kenya’s History: The TJRC Report Six Years On. The Elephant. May 21. Available at: www.theelephant.info/op-eds/2019/05/21/an-injustice-in-kenyas-history-the-tjrc-report-six-years-on/, accessed on February 3, 2020.Google Scholar
Musila, G. M. 2009. Options for Transitional Justice in Kenya: Autonomy and the Challenge of External Prescriptions. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 3(3): 445464.Google Scholar
Mutua, M. 2008. Kenya’s Quest for Democracy: Taming Leviathan: Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Truth, Justice, and Reconciliation Commission. 2013. Report of the Truth Justice and Reconciliation Commission. Available at: https://landportal.org/library/resources/report-truth-justice-and-reconciliation-commission, accessed on February 3, 2020.Google Scholar
Pálos, Máté. 2018. Őfelsége sírrablója – Hízik Schmidt Mária birodalma [His Majesty’s Grave-Robber: Máris Schmidt’s Empire Grows]. Magyar Narancs. March 1. Available at: https://magyarnarancs.hu/belpol/ofelsege-sirrabloja-109605, accessed on August 3, 2022.Google Scholar
Új történeti intézet alakul [New Historical Institute Formed]. 1998. Népszabadság. December 12. Available at: www.rev.hu/rev/images/content/sorsunk/emilek/szabidec12.gif, accessed on December 23, 2009.Google Scholar
Hosaniak, Joanna. 2018. NGOs as Discursive Catalysts at the United Nations and Beyond: An Activist Perspective. In North Korean Human Rights Activists and Networks. Ed. Yeo, Andrew and Chubb, Danielle. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kirby, Michael. 2014. UN Commission of Inquiry on Human Rights Violations in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea: Ten Lessons. Melbourne Journal of International Law, 15(2): 290.Google Scholar
UN Human Rights Council. 2013. Resolution on the Situation of Human Rights in the DPRK. A/HRC/22/L.19. March 18.Google Scholar
UN Human Rights Council. 2014. Report of the Detailed Findings of the Commission of Inquiry on Human Rights in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea. A/HRC/25/63. February 7.Google Scholar
UN Human Rights Council. 2014. Resolution on the Situation of Human Rights in the DPRK. A/HRC/RES/25/25, April 9.Google Scholar
UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. 2014. Statement by Mr. Michael Kirby, Chair of the COI on Human Rights in the DPRK to the 25th Session of the Human Rights Council. March 17.Google Scholar
Farer, Thomas J. and Felice, Gaer. 1993. The UN and Human Rights: At the End of the Beginning. In United Nations, Divided World: The UN’s Roles in International Relations. Eds. Adam Roberts and Benedict Kingsbury. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tolley, Howard. 1987. The United Nations Commission on Human Rights. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Weissbrodt, David. 1989. The 40th Session of the UN Sub-Commission on the Prevention of Discrimination and the Protection of Minorities. Human Rights Quarterly, 11: 295324.Google Scholar
Weissbrodt, David, Mayra, Gómez, and Bret, Thiele. 1998. Highlights of the 50th Session of the UN Sub-Commission on the Prevention of Discrimination and the Protection of Minorities, University of Minnesota, Human Rights Library. Available at: http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/demo/subcom1998.html (accessed February 16, 2010).Google Scholar
Bennett, Tony. 1995. The Birth of the Modern Museum. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Berenbaum, Michael. 1993. The World Must Know: The History of the Holocaust as Told in the United States Holocaust Museum, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Bush, George W. 2007. Remarks by President Bush at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. US Newswire. April 18.Google Scholar
Crysler, C. Greig. 2006. Violence and Empathy: National Museums and the Spectacle of Society. Traditional Dwellings and Settlement Review, 10(2): 1938.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, Norman. 2003. The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Freed, James Ingo. 2003. The United States Holocaust Museum: A Resonator of Memory. Inform: Journal of Architecture, Design, and Material Culture, 3: 1122.Google Scholar
Gourevitch, P. 1995. What They Saw at the Holocaust Museum. New York Times Magazine. February 12.Google Scholar
Novick, Peter. 1999. The Holocaust in American Life, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Official website. Available at: www.ushmm.org/, accessed on December 14, 2019.Google Scholar
Weber, B. 2003. Shock Therapy for Police Recruits: At the Holocaust Museum, Learning to be Good Cops from Very Bad Cops. New York Times. May 10, A19, A21.Google Scholar
Belgrave, M., ed. 1988. The Recognition of Aboriginal Tenure in New Zealand, 1840–1860. Wellington: Waitangi Tribunal.Google Scholar
Binney, Judith, Basset, Judith, and Olssen, Erik, eds. 1990. The People and the Land. Wellington: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Brownlie, I. 1992. Treaties and Indigenous Peoples. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Coates, K. S. and McHugh, P. G., eds. 1998. Living Relationships Kokiri Ngatahi: The Treaty of Waitangi in the New Millennium. Wellington: Victoria University Press.Google Scholar
Durie, M. H. 1998. Te Mana Kawanatanga: The Politics of Maori Self-Determination. Auckland: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hayward, J. and Wheen, Nicola, eds. 2004. The Waitangi Tribunal/Te Roopu Whakamana i te Tiriti o Waitangi. Wellington: Bridget Williams Books.Google Scholar
Kawharu, I. H., ed. 1989. Waitangi – Maori and Pakeha Perspectives of the Treaty of Waitangi. Auckland: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marr, C. 1997. Public Works Takings of Maori Land, 1840–1981 [Report for the Treaty of Waitangi Policy Unit]. Wellington: Waitangi Tribunal.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Keith. 1959. A History of New Zealand. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Temm, P. 1990. The Waitangi Tribunal: The Conscience of the Nation. Auckland: Random Century.Google Scholar
Waitangi Tribunal. Official website. Available at: www.waitangi-tribunal.govt.nz, accessed on June 1, 2010.Google Scholar
Agreement between the High Representative for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Bosnia and Herzegovina on the Establishment of the Registry for Section I for War Crimes and Section II for Organized Crime, Economic Crime and Corruption of the Criminal and Appellate Divisions of the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Special Department for War Crimes, Organized Crime, Economic Crime and Corruption of the Prosecutor’s Office of Bosnia. 2004. BiH Official Gazette, No 12/04 (December 1).Google Scholar
Balkan Transitional Justice. 2018. Bosnia Hopes to Complete War Crimes Cases by 2023. Available at: https://balkaninsight.com/2018/02/23/bosnia-hopes-to-complete-war-crimes-cases-in-2023-02-23-2018/, accessed on November 18, 2019.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch. 2007. Narrowing the Impunity Gap: Trials before Bosnia’s War Crimes Chamber. Available at: www.hrw.org/en/node/11032/section/1, accessed on December 12, 2019.Google Scholar
Ivanišević, Bogdan. 2008. The War Crimes Chamber in Bosnia and Herzegovina: From Hybrid to Domestic Court. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice.Google Scholar
Jelacic, Nerma. 2006. In Pursuit of Justice: Guide to the War Crimes Chamber of BiH. Sarajevo: Balkan Investigative Reporting Network.Google Scholar
National War Crimes Strategy. 2008. December. Available at: www.nuhanovicfoundation.org/en/legal-instruments-2/2008-national-war-crimes-strategy-december-2008/, accessed on October 23, 2009.Google Scholar
Kulchytskyi, Stanislav, ed. 2000. Problema OUN-UPA. Poperednya istorychna dovidka. [The OUN-UPA Problem. Preliminary Historical Conclusions]. Kyiv: Naukova dumka.Google Scholar
Kulchytskyi, Stanislav, ed. 2005a. Orhanizatsiya Ukrayinskykh Natsionalistiv i Ukrayinska Povstanska Armiya. Fakhovyi vysnovok robochoi hrupy istorykiv pry Uryadovii komisiii z vyvchennya diyalnosti OUN i UPA [The Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists and the Ukrainian Insurgent Army. An Expert Conclusion of the Working Group of Historians at the Governmental Commission on the Study of OUN-UPA Activities]. Kyiv: Naukova dumka.Google Scholar
Kulchytskyi, Stanislav, ed. 2005b. Orhanizatsiya Ukrayinskykh Natsionalistiv i Ukrayinska Povstanska Armiia. Istorychni narysy [The Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists and the Ukrainian Insurgent Army. Historical Essays]. Kyiv: Naukova dumka.Google Scholar
Marples, David R. 2007. Heroes and Villains: Creating National History in Contemporary Ukraine. Budapest: Central European University Press.Google Scholar
Myshlovska, Oksana. 2018. Establishing the “Irrefutable Facts” about the OUN and UPA: The Role of the Working Group of Historians on the OUN-UPA Activity in Mediating Memory-Based Conflict in Ukraine. Ab imperio, 1: 223254.Google Scholar
Shevel, Oxana. 2011. The Politics of Memory in a Divided Society: A Comparison of Post-Franco Spain and Post-Soviet Ukraine. Slavic Review, 70(1): 137164.Google Scholar
Borowiak, Craig. 2008. The World Tribunal on Iraq: Citizens’ Tribunals and the Struggle for Accountability. New Political Science, 30(2): 161186.Google Scholar
Byrnes, Andrew and Simm, Gabrielle. 2018. Peoples’ Tribunals and International Law. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Çubukçu, Ayça. 2011. On Cosmopolitan Occupations: The Case of the World Tribunal on Iraq. Interventions, 13(3): 422442.Google Scholar
Çubukçu, Ayça. 2018. For the Love of Humanity: The World Tribunal on Iraq. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Falk, Richard. 2008. The Costs of War: International Law, the UN, and World Order after Iraq. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gerson, Janet C. 2013. Democratizing Global Justice: The World Tribunal on Iraq. In Factis Pax, 7(2): 66112.Google Scholar
Gerson, Janet C. 2014. Public Deliberation on Global Justice: The World Tribunal on Iraq. Ed.D. Dissertation. Columbia University, New York, United States.Google Scholar
Nayar, Jayan. 2006. Taking Empire Seriously: Empire’s Law, Peoples’ Law and the World Tribunal on Iraq. In Empire’s Law: The American Imperial Project and the “War to Remake the World.” Ed. Bartholomew, Amy. London: Pluto Press, pp. 313339.Google Scholar
Sökmen, Müge Gürsoy, ed. 2008. World Tribunal on Iraq: Making the Case against War. Northampton, MA: Olive Branch Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×