Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T15:53:09.168Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Emerging Methods for Biological Control of Barley Diseases Including the Role of Endophytes

from Part II - Role of Endophytes in Growth and Biotic and Abiotic Stress Resistance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2019

Trevor R. Hodkinson
Affiliation:
Trinity College Dublin
Fiona M. Doohan
Affiliation:
University College Dublin
Matthew J. Saunders
Affiliation:
Trinity College Dublin
Brian R. Murphy
Affiliation:
Trinity College Dublin
Get access

Summary

Barley is an important crop worldwide with production largely used for animal feed and alcoholic beverages. Diseases are a major limiting factor to its production. These have, up until recently, been controlled by agrochemicals. However, legislation on the use of agrochemicals, especially within the European Union, is being tightened and there is growing interest in integrated pest management. This means that there is an increasing focus on controlling diseases using biological control. Living microorganisms that are applied as biological control agents (BCAs) to either soil, seed or leaves can have difficulty in persisting. Therefore, the focus of this review is on endophytes, which are microorganisms that live inside the plant without causing symptoms of disease and have the potential of staying protected as well as being beneficial to the plant and effective against multiple diseases. In this review, we discuss the different approaches for finding and testing beneficial endophytes and for determining the endophyte host range. Furthermore, we undertook a literature search to summarise previous studies that have investigated the use of endophytes as well as BCAs against barley diseases.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahamsen, S. (1992). Methods for testing fungal antagonists against Drechslera teres in barley seeds. IOBC-WPRS Bulletin, 15, 2729.Google Scholar
Achatz, B., von Rüden, S., Andrade, D. et al. (2010). Root colonization by Piriformospora indica enhances grain yield in barley under diverse nutrient regimes by accelerating plant development. Plant and Soil, 333, 5970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akar, T., Avci, M. and Dusunceli, F. (2004). Barley: Post-Harvest Operations. Rome: Food and Agricultre Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
Alabouvette, C., Olivain, C. and Steinberg, C. (2006). Biological control of plant diseases: the European situation. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 114, 329341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ali-Hoimoud, D.-E., Mostafa, M., Barrault, G. and Albertini, L. (1993). Evaluation of organisms antagonistic to the sclerorotid organs of Drechslera teres, the causal agent of barley net blotch. Plant Disease, 77, 12511255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aly, A. H., Debbab, A. and Proksch, P. (2011). Fungal endophytes: unique plant inhabitants with great promises. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 90, 18291845.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Araujo, W. L., Marcon, J., Maccheroni, W. et al. (2002). Diversity of endophytic bacterial populations and their interaction with Xylella fastidiosa in citrus plants. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 68, 49064914.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balog, A., Hartel, T., Loxdale, H. D. and Wilson, K. (2017). Differences in the progress of the biopesticide revolution between the EU and other major crop-growing regions. Pest Management Science, 73, 22032208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Bary, A. (1884). Vergleichende Morphologie und Biologie der Pilze, Mycetozoen, und Bacterien. Leipzig, Germany: Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann.Google Scholar
Brar, G. S. and Hucl, P. J. (2017). Cultivar description 00Ar134-1, a spring wheat line of intergeneric origin. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 97, 153156.Google Scholar
Braun-Kiewnick, A., Jacobsen, B. J. and Sands, D. C. (2000). Biological control of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae, the causal agent of basal kernel blight of barley, by antagonistic Pantoea agglomerans. Phytopathology, 90, 368375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broadfoot, M. (2016). Microbes added to seeds could boost crop production. Scientific American. www.scientificamerican.com/article/microbes-added-to-seeds-could-boost-crop-production/Google Scholar
Buddrus-Schiemann, K., Schmid, M., Schreiner, K. et al. (2010). Root colonization by Pseudomonas sp. DSMZ 13134 and impact on the indigenous rhizosphere bacterial community of barley. Microbial Ecology, 60, 381393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choi, G. J., Kim, J. C., Jang, K. S. and Lee, D. H. (2007). Antifungal activities of Bacillus thuringiensis isolates on barley and cucumber powdery mildews. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 17, 20712075.Google ScholarPubMed
Clay, K. (1990). Fungal endophytes of grasses. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 21, 275297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comby, M., Lacoste, S., Baillieul, F., Profizi, C. and Dupont, J. (2016). Spatial and temporal variation of cultivable communities of co-occurring endophytes and pathogens in wheat. Frontiers in Microbiology, 7, 403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coombs, J. T., Michelsen, P. P. and Franco, C. M. M. (2004). Evaluation of endophytic Actinobacteria as antagonists of Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici in wheat. Biological Control, 29, 359366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Agriculture (2013). National Action Plan for the Sustainable Use of Pesticides, Vol. II. Dublin: Pesticide Registration & Control Division, Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine.Google Scholar
Deshmukh, S. D. and Kogel, K.-H. (2007). Piriformospora indica protects barley root rot caused by Fusarium graminearum. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, 114, 18613829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duczek, L. J. (1997). Biological control of common root rot in barley by Idriella bolleyi. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, 194, 402405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eevers, N., Gielen, M., Sánchez-López, A. et al. (2015). Optimization of isolation and cultivation of bacterial endophytes through addition of plant extract to nutrient media. Microbial Biotechnology, 8, 707715.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, J. G. (2017). Can plant microbiome studies lead to effective biocontrol of plant diseases? Molecular Plant–Microbe Interactions, 30, 190193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ENDURE (2008). ENDURE IPM Training Guide, Chapter Arguments. www.endure-network.eu/Google Scholar
European Parliament (2009). Directive 2009/128/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 21 October 2009 Establishing a Framework for Community Action to Achieve the Sustainable Use of Pesticides. October, Vol. 309.Google Scholar
Evans, H. C., Holmes, K. A. and Thomas, S. E. (2003). Endophytes and mycoparasites associated with an indigenous forest tree, Theobroma gileri, in Ecuador and a preliminary assessment of their potential as biocontrol agents of cocoa diseases. Mycological Progress, 2, 149160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAOSTAT (2018). Statistical databases. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. www.fao.org/faostat/en/#homeGoogle Scholar
Fedak, G., Cao, W., Wolfe, D., Chi, D. and Xue, A. (2017). Molecular characterization of Fusarium resistance from Elymus repens introgressed into bread wheat. Cytology and Genetics, 51, 130133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fravel, D. R. (1988). Role of antibiosis in the biocontrol of plant diseases. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 26, 7591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guetsky, R., Shtienberg, D., Elad, Y., Fischer, E. and Dinoor, A. (2002). Improving biological control by combining biocontrol agents each with several mechanisms of disease suppression. Phytopathology, 92, 976985.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hardoim, P. R., van Overbeek, L. S., Berg, G. et al. (2015). The hidden world within plants: ecological and evolutionary considerations for defining functioning of microbial endophytes. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 79, 293320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrach, B. D., Baltruschat, H., Barna, B., Fodor, J. and Kogel, K.-H. (2013). The mutualistic fungus Piriformospora indica protects barley roots from a loss of antioxidant capacity caused by the necrotrophic pathogen Fusarium culmorum. Molecular Plant–Microbe Interactions, 26, 599605.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hodkinson, T. R. (2018). Evolution and taxonomy of the grasses (Poaceae): a model family for the study of species-rich groups. Annual Plant Reviews Online, doi: 10.1002/9781119312994.apr0622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hökeberg, M., Gerhardson, B. and Johnsson, L. (1997). Biological control of cereal seed-borne diseases by seed bacterization with greenhouse-selected bacteria. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 103, 2533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Høyer, A. K., Jørgensen, H. J. L., Amby, D. B. and Jensen, B. (2016). Endophytic colonisation of tomato plants by the biological control agent Clonostachys rosea. IOBC-WPRS Bulletin, 115, 101106.Google Scholar
Hubbard, M., Germida, J. J. and Vujanovic, V. (2014). Fungal endophytes enhance wheat heat and drought tolerance in terms of grain yield and second-generation seed viability. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 116, 109122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, B., Knudsen, I. M. B. and Jensen, D. F. (2000). Biological seed treatment of cereals with fresh and long-term stored formulations of Clonostachys rosea: biocontrol efficacy against Fusarium culmorum. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 106, 233242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, B., Knudsen, I. M. B. and Funck Jensen, D. (2002). Survival of conidia of Clonostachys rosea on stored barley seeds and their biocontrol efficacy against seed-borne Bipolaris sorokiniana. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 124, 427441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, B., Lübeck, P. S. and Jørgensen, H. J. (2016). Clonostachys rosea reduces spot blotch in barley by inhibiting prepenetration growth and sporulation of Bipolaris sorokiniana without inducing resistance. Pest Management Science, 72, 22312239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnsson, L., Hökeberg, M. and Gerhardson, B. (1998). Performance of the Pseudomonas chlororaphis biocontrol agent MA 342 against cereal seed-borne diseases in field experiments. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 104, 701711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, H. J. L., Andresen, H. and Smedegaard-Petersen, V. (1996). Control of Drechslera teres and other barley pathogens by preinoculation with Bipolaris maydis and Septoria nodorum. Phytopathology, 86, 602607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, H. J. L., Lübeck, P. S. et al. (1998). Mechanisms of induced resistance in barley against Drechslera teres. Phytopathology, 88, 698707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jumpponen, A. and Trappe, J. M. (1998). Dark septate endophytes: a review of facultative biotrophic root-colonizing fungi. New Phytologist, 140, 295310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kabaluk, J. T., Svircev, M. S., Goettel, M. S. and Woo, S. G., eds. (2010). The Use and Regulation of Microbial Pesticides in Representative Jurisdictions Worldwide. IOBC Global, www.IOBC-Global.org.Google Scholar
Khan, M. R. and Doohan, F. M. (2008a). Bacterium-mediated control of Fusarium head blight disease of wheat and barley and associated mycotoxin contamination of grain. Biological Control, 48, 4247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, M. R. and Doohan, F. M. (2008b). Comparison of the efficacy of chitosan with that of a fluorescent pseudomonad for the control of Fusarium head blight disease of cereals and associated mycotoxin contamination of grain. Biological Control, 48, 4854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, M. R., Fischer, S., Egan, D. and Doohan, F. M. (2006). Biological control of Fusarium seedling blight disease of wheat and barley. Phytopathology, 96, 386394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirk, J. J. and Deacon, J. W. (1987). Control of the take-all fungus by Microdochium bolleyi, and interactions involving M. bolleyi, Phialophora graminicola and Periconia macrospinosa on cereal roots. Plant and Soil, 98, 231237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knudsen, I. M. B., Hockenhull, J. and Jensen, D. F. (1995). Biocontrol of seedling diseases of barley and wheat caused by Fusarium culmorum and Bipolaris sorokiniana: effects of selected fungal antagonists on growth and yield components. Plant Pathology, 44, 467477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knudsen, I. M. B., Hockenhull, J., Funck Jensen, D. et al. (1997). Selection of biological control agents for controlling soil and seed-borne diseases in the field. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 103, 775784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, E., Weil, B., Wächter, R., Wohlleben, S. et al. (2006). Evaluation of selected microbial strains and commercial alternative products as seed treatments for the control of Tilletia tritici, Fusarium culmorum, Drechslera graminea and D. teres. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, 113, 150158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Köhl, J. J., Molhoek, W. W. M. L. et al. (2009). Selection and orchard testing of antagonists suppressing conidial production by the apple scab pathogen Venturia inaequalis. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 123, 401414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, M., Yadav, V., Tuteja, N. and Johri, A. K. (2009). Antioxidant enzyme activities in maize plants colonized with Piriformospora indica. Microbiology, 155(3), 780790.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liljeroth, E. and Bryngelsson, T. (2002). Seed treatment of Barley with Idriella bolleyi causes systemically enhanced defence against root and leaf infection by Bipolaris sorokiniana. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 12, 235249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindow, S. E. and Brandl, M. T. (2003). Microbiology of the phyllosphere. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 69, 18751883.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindsey III, B. E., Rivero, L., Calhoun, C. S., Grotewold, E. and Brkljacic, J. (2017). Standardized method for high-throughput sterilization of Arabidopsis seeds video link. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 128, 56587.Google Scholar
Maciá-Vicente, J. G., Jansson, H.-B., Mendgen, K. and Lopez-Llorca, L. V. (2008). Colonization of barley roots by endophytic fungi and their reduction of take-all caused by Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 54, 600609.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maciá-Vicente, J. G., Rosso, L. C., Ciancio, A. et al. (2009). Colonisation of barley roots by endophytic Fusarium equiseti and Pochonia chlamydosporia: effects on plant growth and disease. Annals of Applied Biology, 155, 391401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandyam, K., Loughin, T. and Jumpponen, A. (2010). Isolation and morphological and metabolic characterization of common endophytes in annually burned tallgrass prairie. Mycologia, 102, 813821.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mathre, D. E., ed. (1982). Compendium of Barley Diseases. St Paul, MN: APS Press.Google Scholar
Mercado-Blanco, J., Alos, E., Rey, M. D. and Prieto, P. (2016). Pseudomonas fluorescens PICF7 displays an endophytic lifestyle in cultivated cereals and enhances yield in barley. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 92, 113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monfort, E., Lopez-Llorca, L. V., Jansson, H.-B. et al. (2005). Colonisation of seminal roots of wheat and barley by egg-parasitic nematophagous fungi and their effects on Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici and development of root rot. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 37, 12291235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mostafa, M.-M. (1993). Biological control of Drechslera teres: ability of antagonists to reduce conidia formation, coleoptile infection and leaf infection in barley (Hordeum vulgare). Cryptogamie Mycologie, 14, 287295.Google Scholar
Moya, P., Pedemonte, D., Amengual, S., Franco, M. E. E. and Sisterna, M. N. (2016). Antagonism and modes of action of Chaetomium globosum species group, potential biocontrol agent of barley foliar diseases. The Bulletin of the Botanical Society of Argentina, 51, 569578.Google Scholar
Müller, D. B., Vogel, C., Bai, Y. and Vorholt, J. A. (2016). The plant microbiota: systems-level insights and perspectives. Annual Review of Genetics, 50, 211234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, B. R., Doohan, F. M. and Hodkinson, T. R. (2015a). Fungal root endophytes of a wild barley species increase yield in a nutrient-stressed barley cultivar. Symbiosis, 65, 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, B. R., Doohan, F. M. and Hodkinson, T. R. (2015b). Persistent fungal root endophytes isolated from a wild barley species suppress seed-borne infections in a barley cultivar. BioControl, 60, 281292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, B., Doohan, F. M. and Hodkinson, T. R. (2018). From concept to commerce: developing a successful fungal endophyte inoculant for agricultural crops. Journal of Fungi, 4, 24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nandwani, D. and Nwosisi, S. (2016). Global trends in organic agriculture. In Organic Farming for Sustainable Agriculture, ed. Nandwani, D. Berlin: Springer International Publishing, pp. 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naveed, M., Mitter, B., Reichenauer, T. G., Wieczorek, K. and Sessitsch, A. (2014). Increased drought stress resilience of maize through endophytic colonization by Burkholderia phytofirmans PsJN and Enterobacter sp. FD17. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 97, 3039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, L. K., Cook, D. J., Edwards, S. G. and Ray, R. V. (2014). The prevalence and impact of Fusarium head blight pathogens and mycotoxins on malting barley quality in UK. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 179, 3849.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nissinen, R. M., Männistö, M. K. and van Elsas, J. D. (2012). Endophytic bacterial communities in three arctic plants from low arctic fell tundra are cold-adapted and host-plant specific. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 82, 510522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oliveira, P., Mauch, A., Jacob, F. and Arendt, E. K. (2012). Impact of Fusarium culmorum-infected barley malt grains on brewing and beer quality. American Society of Brewing Chemists, 70, 186194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pal, K. K. and Gardener, B. M. (2006). Biological control of plant pathogens. The Plant Health Instructor, doi: 10.1094/PHI-A-2006-1117-02.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porras-Alfaro, A. and Bayman, P. (2011). Hidden fungi, emergent properties: endophytes and microbiomes. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 49, 291315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Punja, Z. K. (1997). Comparative efficacy of bacteria, fungi, and yeasts as biological control agents for diseases of vegetable crops. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, 19, 315323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabiey, M., Ullah, I. and Shaw, M. W. (2015). The endophytic fungus Piriformospora indica protects wheat from Fusarium crown rot disease in simulated UK autumn conditions. Plant Pathology, 64, 10291040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renwick., A., Campbell, R. and Coe, S. (1991). Assessment of in vivo screening systems for potential biocontrol agents of Gaeumannomyces graminis. Plant Pathology, 40, 524532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez, R. J., Henson, J., Van Volkenburgh, E. et al. (2008). Stress tolerance in plants via habitat-adapted symbiosis. The ISME Journal, 2, 404416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roylawar, P., Panda, S. and Kamble, A. (2015). Comparative analysis of BABA and Piriformospora indica mediated priming of defence-related genes in tomato against early blight. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 91, 8895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serfling, A., Wirsel, S. G. R., Lind, V. and Deising, H. B. (2007). Performance of the biocontrol fungus Piriformospora indica on wheat under greenhouse and field conditions. Phytopathology, 97, 523531.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silva, H. S. A., Tozzi, J. P. L., Terrasan, C. R. F. and Bettiol, W. (2012). Endophytic microorganisms from coffee tissues as plant growth promoters and biocontrol agents of coffee leaf rust. Biological Control, 63, 6267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ting, A. S. Y., Fang, M. T. and Tee, C. S. (2009). Assessment on the effect of formulative materials on the viability and efficacy of Serratia marcescens: a biocontrol agent against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense race 4. American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 4, 283288.Google Scholar
Ullrich, S. E. (2011). Significance, adaptation, production, and trade of barley. In Barley: Production Improvement and Uses, ed. Ullrich, S. E. Ames, IA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 313.Google Scholar
Varma, A., Bakshi, M., Lou, B., Hartmann, A. and Oelmueller, R. (2012). Piriformospora indica: a novel plant growth-promoting mycorrhizal fungus. Agricultural Research, 1, 117131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Videira, S. I. R., Groenewald, J. Z., Braun, U., Shin, H. D. and Crous, P. W. (2016). All that glitters is not Ramularia. Studies in Mycology, 83, 49163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vilich, V., Dolfen, M. and Sikora, R. A. (1998). Chaetomium spp. colonization of barley following seed treatment and its effect on plant growth and Erysiphe graminis f. sp. hordei disease severity. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, 105, 130139.Google Scholar
Walker, R., Rossall, S. and Asher, M. J. C. (2002). Colonization of the developing rhizosphere of sugar beet seedlings by potential biocontrol agents applied as seed treatments. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 92, 228237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waller, F., Achatz, B., Baltruschat, H. et al. (2005). The endophytic fungus Piriformospora indica reprograms barley to salt-stress tolerance, disease resistance, and higher yield. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 1338613391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walters, D. (2009). Controlling plant disease using biological and environmentally friendly approaches: making it work in practice. In Disease Control in Crops: Biological and Environmentally Friendly Approaches, ed. Walters, D.. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 257261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walters, D. R., Avrova, A., Bingham, I. J. et al. (2012). Control of foliar diseases in barley: towards an integrated approach. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 133, 3373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, H., Zheng, J., Ren, X. et al. (2015). Effects of Piriformospora indica on the growth, fruit quality and interaction with tomato yellow leaf curl virus in tomato cultivars susceptible and resistant to TYCLV. Plant Growth Regulation, 76, 303313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wearn, J. A., Sutton, B. C., Morley, N. J. and Gange, A. C. (2012). Species and organ specificity of fungal endophytes in herbaceous grassland plants. Journal of Ecology, 100, 10851092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiß, M., Waller, F., Zuccaro, A. and Selosse, M.-A. (2016). Sebacinales: one thousand and one interactions with land plants. New Phytologist, 211, 2040.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whipps, J. M. (1987). Effect of media on growth and interactions between a range of soil-borne glasshouse pathogens and antagonistic fungi. New Phytologist, 107, 127142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whipps, J. M. and Magan, N. (1987). Effects of nutrient status and water potential of media on fungal growth and antagonist-pathogen interactions. EPPO Bulletin, 17, 581591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, H. H., Siegel, M. R., Blankenship, J. D. et al. (2000). Contribution of fungal loline alkaloids to protection from aphids in a grass–endophyte mutualism. Molecular Plant–Microbe Interactions, 13, 10271033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. (1995). Endophyte: the evolution of a term, and clarification of its use and definition. Oikos, 73, 274276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yekkour, A., Sabaou, N., Zitouni, A., Errakhi, R., Mathieu, F. and Lebrihi, A. (2012). Characterization and antagonistic properties of Streptomyces strains isolated from Saharan soils, and evaluation of their ability to control seedling blight of barley caused by Fusarium culmorum. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 55, 427435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zabalgogeazcoa, I. (2008). Fungal endophytes and their interaction with plant pathogens. Spanish Journal Of Agricultural Research, 6, 138146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeng, J., Cao, W., Hucl, P. et al. (2013). Molecular cytogenetic analysis of wheat Elymus repens introgression lines with resistance to Fusarium head blight. Genome, 56, 7582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×