Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-r7xzm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T16:34:23.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2016

Isabella Alcañiz
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, College Park
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Environmental and Nuclear Networks in the Global South
How Skills Shape International Cooperation
, pp. 191 - 202
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abers, R. N., & Keck, M. E. (2013). Practical authority: Agency and institutional change in Brazilian water politics. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, E. (1987). The power of ideology: The quest for technological autonomy in Argentina and Brazil. Oakland: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Adler, E. (1992). The emergence of cooperation: National epistemic communities and the international evolution of the idea of nuclear arms control. International Organization, 46(01), 101145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, E. (2008). The spread of security communities: Communities of practice, self-restraint, and NATO's post-Cold War transformation. European Journal of International Relations, 14(2), 195230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agranoff, R. (2006). Inside collaborative networks: Ten lessons for public managers. Public Administration Review, 66(1), 5665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agrawal, A. (2005). Environmentality: Technologies of government and the making of subjects. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Agrawal, A. (2014). Studying the commons, governing common-pool resource outcomes: Some concluding thoughts. Environmental Science & Policy, 36, 8691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcañiz, I. (2000). Slipping into something more comfortable: Argentine-Brazilian nuclear integration and the origins of the MERCOSUR. In Derluguian, G. M. & Greer, S. L. (Eds.), Questioning geopolitics: Political projects in a changing world-system (pp. 155168). Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Alcañiz, I. (2005a). Defeating welfare retrenchment: Privatization and conflict in the Argentine nuclear energy sector. New Political Science, 27(3), 331344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcañiz, I. (2005b). La política nuclear Argentina y el Instituto Balseiro: Cincuenta años de historia (Argentine nuclear policy and the Balseiro Institute: Fifty years of history). Ciencia Hoy, 88, 2025.Google Scholar
Alcañiz, I. (2010). Bureaucratic networks and government spending: A network analysis of nuclear cooperation in Latin America. Latin American Research Review, 45(1), 148172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcañiz, I. (2012). Democratization and multilateral security. World Politics, 64(02), 306340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcañiz, I., & Gutiérrez, R. A. (2009). From local protest to the International Court of Justice. In Harris, P. G. (Ed.), Environmental change and foreign policy: Theory and practice (pp. 109120). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Alcañiz, I., & Hellwig, T. (2011). Who's to blame? The distribution of responsibility in developing democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 41(02), 389411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alemán, E., & Calvo, E. (2013). Explaining policy ties in presidential congresses: A network analysis of bill initiation data. Political Studies, 61(2), 356377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, A., Baqir, R., & Easterly, W. (1997). Public goods and ethnic divisions. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amengual, M. (2016). Politicized enforcement in Argentina: Labor and environmental regulation. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amirault, R. J., & Branson, R. K. (2006). Educators and expertise: A brief history of theories and models. The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 6986). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andler, L. (2009). The secretariat of the global environment facility: From network to bureaucracy. In Biermann, F. & Siebenhüner, B. (Eds.), Managers of global change: The influence of international environmental bureaucracies (pp. 203223). Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andonova, L. B. (2014). Boomerangs to partnerships? Explaining state participation in transnational partnerships for sustainability. Comparative Political Studies, 47(3), 481515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andonova, L. B., & Mitchell, R. B. (2010). The rescaling of global environmental politics. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 35(1), 255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arriola, L. R., & Johnson, M. C. (2014). Ethnic politics and women's empowerment in Africa: Ministerial appointments to executive cabinets. American Journal of Political Science, 58(2), 495510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auyero, J., & Swistun, D. A. (2009). Flammable: Environmental suffering in an Argentine shantytown. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bach, D., & Newman, A. L. (2010). Transgovernmental networks and domestic policy convergence: Evidence from insider trading regulation. International Organization, 64(3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bach, D., & Newman, A. L. (2014). Domestic drivers of transgovernmental regulatory cooperation. Regulation & Governance, 8(4), 395417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bafumi, J., Gelman, A., Park, D. K., & Kaplan, N. (2005). Practical issues in implementing and understanding Bayesian ideal point estimation. Political Analysis, 13(2), 171187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, A. (2009). The market and the masses in Latin America: Policy reform and consumption in liberalizing economies. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, T. D. (2016). Gendering legislative behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, M., & Finnemore, M. (2004). Rules for the world: International organizations in global politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bauer, S. (2006). Does bureaucracy really matter? The authority of intergovernmental treaty secretariats in global environmental politics. Global Environmental Politics, 6(1), 2349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, G. S. (2009). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bendor, J., & Meirowitz, A. (2004). Spatial models of delegation. American Political Science Review, 98(02), 293310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berardo, R., & Scholz, J. T. (2010). Self‐organizing policy networks: Risk, partner selection, and cooperation in estuaries. American Journal of Political Science, 54(3), 632649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berardo, R., Alcañiz, I., Hadden, J., & Jasny, L. (2016). Environmental politics and networks. In Nicoll, J., Lubell, M., & Montgomery, A. H. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political networks. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Biermann, F., & Siebenhüner, B. (2009). Managers of global change: The influence of international environmental bureaucracies. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blais, A., & Dion, S. (1990). Are bureaucrats budget maximizers? The Niskanen model & its critics. Polity, 22(4), 655674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, A. L., & Snower, D. J. (1996). Acquiring skills: Market failures, their symptoms and policy responses. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bresnahan, T. F., Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. M. (1999). Information technology, workplace organization and the demand for skilled labor: Firm-level evidence. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Brown, P. (2005). Skill formation in the twenty-first century. In Brown, P., Green, A., & Lauder, H. (Eds.), High skills: Globalization, competitiveness, and skill formation (pp. 155). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, P., Green, A., & Lauder, H. (2005). High skills: Globalization, competitiveness, and skill formation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Busemeyer, M. R., & Trampusch, C. (2012). The political economy of collective skill formation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Calvo, E., & Murillo, M. V. (2013). When parties meet voters: Assessing political linkages through partisan networks and distributive expectations in Argentina and Chile. Comparative Politics Studies, 46(07), 851882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campion, P., & Shrum, W. (2004). Gender and science in development: Women scientists in Ghana, Kenya, and India. Science, Technology & Human Values, 29(04), 459485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carasales, J. C. (1997). De rivales a socios: El proceso de cooperación nuclear entre Argentina y Brasil. Buenos Aires: Grupo Editor Latinoamericano.Google Scholar
Carasales, J. C., & Ornstein, R. (1998). La Cooperación Internacional de la Argentina en el Campo Nuclear. Buenos Aires: Editorial CARI.Google Scholar
Caraway, T. L., Rickard, S. J., & Anner, M. S. (2012). International negotiations and domestic politics: The case of IMF labor market conditionality. International Organization, 66(01), 2761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmen, E., Nesshöver, C., Saarikoski, H., Vandewalle, M., Watt, A., Wittmer, H., & Young, J. (2015). Creating a biodiversity science community: Experiences from a European network of knowledge. Environmental Science & Policy, 54(01), 497504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, D. P. (2001). The forging of bureaucratic autonomy: Reputations, networks, and policy innovation in executive agencies, 1862–1928. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chwieroth, J. M. (2007). Testing and measuring the role of ideas: The case of neoliberalism in the International Monetary Fund. International Studies Quarterly, 51(1), 530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chwieroth, J. M. (2010). How do crises lead to change? Liberalizing capital controls in the early years of new order Indonesia. World Politics, 62(03), 496527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coll, J. A., & Radicella, R. (1998). First nuclear technology transfers and the subsequent developments in the radioisotope field. In Carasales, J. C. & Ornstein, R. (Eds.), La Cooperación internacional de la Argentina en el campo nuclear. Buenos Aires: Editorial CARI.Google Scholar
Conca, K. (2005). Old states in new bottles? The hybridization of authority in global environmental governance. In Barry, J. & Eckersley, R. (Eds.), The state and the global ecological crisis (pp. 181205). Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conca, K. (2006). Governing water: Contentious transnational politics and global institution building. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Conceição, P., & Marone, H. (2008). Characterizing the 21st century first commodity boom: Drivers and impact. Working Paper of the Office of Development Studies, United Nations Development Programme, New York.Google Scholar
Copelovitch, M. S. (2010). Master or servant? Common agency and the political economy of IMF lending. International Studies Quarterly, 54(1), 4977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cranmer, S. J., & Desmarais, B. A. (2011). Inferential network analysis with exponential random graph models. Political Analysis, 19(1), 6686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cremer, H., & Laffont, J.-J. (2003). Public goods with costly access. Journal of Public Economics, 87(9), 19852012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowe, J. (2007). The forging of judicial autonomy: Political entrepreneurship and the reforms of William Howard Taft. Journal of Politics, 69(1), 7387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dankelman, I. (2010). Gender and climate change: An introduction. Washington DC: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Danziger, J. N., & Andersen, K. V. (2002). The impacts of information technology on public administration: An analysis of empirical research from the “Golden Age” of transformation. International Journal of Public Administration, 25(5), 591627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darnton, C. (2014). Rivalry and alliance politics in cold war Latin America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Da Rosa, , , J. E. (1983). Economics, politics, and hydroelectric power: The Paraná river basin. Latin American Research Review, 18(3), 77107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Andrade, A. M. R., & dos Santos, T. L. (2013). A dinâmica política da criação da Comissão Nacional de Energia Nuclear, 1956–1960 (Political dynamics of the creation of the Brazilian National Commission for Nuclear Energy, 1956–1960). Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas, 8(1), 113128.Google Scholar
De Ferranti, D. M. (2003). Closing the gap in education and technology. Washington DC: World Bank Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Grip, A., & Van Loo, J. (2002). The economics of skills obsolescence: A review. Research in Labor Economics, 21, 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ericsson, K. A. (Ed.). (2006). The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erten, B., & Ocampo, J. A. (2013). Super cycles of commodity prices since the mid-nineteenth century. World Development, 44, 1430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escobar-Lemmon, M. C., & Taylor-Robinson, M. M. (2014). Representation: The case of women. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estévez-Abe, M. (2012). Gendered consequences of vocational training. In Busemeyer, M. R. & Trampusch, C. (Eds.), The political economy of collective skill formation (pp. 259283). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Estevez-Abe, M., Iversen, T., & Soskice, D. (2001). Social protection and the formation of skills: A reinterpretation of the welfare state. In Hall, P. A. & Soskice, D. (Eds.), Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage (pp. 145183). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evangelista, M. (1993). Internal and external constraints on grand strategy: The Soviet case. In Rosecrance, R. N. & Stein, A. A. (Eds.), The domestic bases of grand strategy (pp. 154178). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Evangelista, M. (2002). Unarmed forces: The transnational movement to end the Cold War. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, P. B. (1995). Embedded autonomy: States and industrial transformation. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, P. B., Rueschemeyer, D., & Skocpol, T. (1985). Bringing the state back in. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evetts, J., Mieg, H. A., & Felt, U. (2006). Professionalization, scientific expertise, and elitism: A sociological perspective. In Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P. J., & Hoffman, R. R. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 105123). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falleti, T. G. (2011). Varieties of authoritarianism: The organization of the military state and its effects on federalism in Argentina and Brazil. Studies in Comparative International Development, 46(2), 137162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan, S., & Rao, N. (2003). Public spending in developing countries: Trends, determination and impact. International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
Fredriksson, P. G., & Gaston, N. (2000). Ratification of the 1992 climate change convention: What determines legislative delay? Public Choice, 104(3–4), 345368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frieden, J. A. (1991). Debt, development, and democracy: Modern political economy and Latin America, 1965–1985. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gailmard, S. (2002). Expertise, subversion, and bureaucratic discretion. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 18(2), 536555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gailmard, S., & Patty, J. W. (2013). Learning while governing: Expertise and accountability in the executive branch. Chicago: University of Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, A. A. (1999). Africa's overgrown state reconsidered: Bureaucracy and economic growth. World Politics, 51(04), 520546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodliffe, J., & Hawkins, D. G. (2006). Explaining commitment: States and the convention against torture. Journal of Politics, 68(2), 358371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, A., & Sakamoto, A. (2005). Models of high skills in national competition strategies. In Brown, P., Green, A., & Lauder, H. (Eds.), High skills: Globalization, competitiveness and skill formation (pp. 56161). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Guadalupe, M. (2007). Product market competition, returns to skill, and wage inequality. Journal of Labor Economics, 25(3), 439474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez, R. A., & Isuani, F. J. (2014). The emergence of state and social environmentalism in Argentina. Revista de Administração Pública, 48(2), 295332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, P. M. (1989). Do regimes matter? Epistemic communities and Mediterranean pollution control. International Organization, 43(03), 377403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, P. M. (1992a). Banning chlorofluorocarbons: Epistemic community efforts to protect stratospheric ozone. International Organization, 46(01), 187224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, P. M. (1992b). Introductions: Epistemic communities and international policy co-ordination. International Organization, 46(1), 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadden, J. (2015). Networks in contention: The divisive politics of climate change. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haggard, S., & Kaufman, R. (1995). The political economy of democratic transitions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, P. A. (1986). Governing the economy: The politics of state intervention in Britain and France. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, P. A. (Ed.). (1989). The political power of economic ideas: Keynesianism across nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heclo, H. (1978). Issue networks and the executive establishment. In King, A. (Ed.), The new American political system. Washington DC: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Helbling, T., Mercer-Blackman, V., & Cheng, K. (2008). Riding a wave. Finance and Development, 45(1), 1015.Google Scholar
Hellwig, T. (2014). Globalization and mass politics: Retaining the room to maneuver. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrera, Y. M. (2010). Mirrors of the economy: National accounts and international norms in Russia and beyond. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hicks, R. L., Parks, B. C., Roberts, J. T., & Tierney, M. J. (2008). Greening aid? Understanding the environmental impact of development assistance. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochstetler, K. (2002). After the boomerang: Environmental movements and politics in the La Plata River basin. Global Environmental Politics, 2(4), 3557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochstetler, K., & Keck, M. E. (2007). Greening Brazil: Environmental activism in state and society: Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Hoel, M. (1992). International environment conventions: The case of uniform reductions of emissions. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2(2), 141159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffer, A. J. (2013). Bureaucratic behavior: Budget cuts, imperfect information, and the 2013 sequester. Social Science Research Network.Google Scholar
Huber, E., & Solt, F. (2004). Successes and failures of neoliberalism. Latin American Research Review, 39(3), 150164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, E., & Stephens, J. D. (2012). Democracy and the left: Social policy and inequality in Latin America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, J. D., & Shipan, C. R. (2002). Deliberate discretion? The institutional foundations of bureaucratic autonomy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, J. D., & Shipan, C. R. (2006). Politics, delegation, and bureaucracy. In Weingast, B. R. & Wittman, D. A. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political economy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jordana, J., Levi-Faur, D., & i Marín, X. F. (2011). The global diffusion of regulatory agencies: Channels of transfer and stages of diffusion. Comparative Political Studies, 44(10), 13431369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahler, M. (1992). Multilateralism with small and large numbers. International Organization, 46(03), 681708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamelarczyk, K. B. F., & Smith-Hall, C. (2014). REDD herring: Epistemic community control of the production, circulation and application of deforestation knowledge in Zambia. Forest Policy and Economics, 46, 1929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, S. B. (2013). Globalization and austerity politics in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapstein, E. B. (1992). Between power and purpose: Central bankers and the politics of regulatory convergence. International Organization, 46(01), 265287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kassenova, T. (2014). Brazil's nuclear kaleidoscope: An evolving identity. Washington DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
Kauffman-Zeh, A. (1998). Brazil forced to cut back science funding. Nature, 395(6705), 831835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Keiser, L. R., Wilkins, V. M., Meier, K. J., & Holland, C. A. (2002). Lipstick and logarithms: Gender, institutional context, and representative bureaucracy. American Political Science Review, 96(03), 553564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1974). Transgovernmental relations and international organizations. World Politics, 27(01), 3962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinne, B. J. (2013). Network dynamics and the evolution of international cooperation. American Political Science Review, 107(04), 766785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krook, M. L. (2009). Quotas for women in politics: Gender and candidate selection reform worldwide. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurtz, M. J. (2004). Free market democracy and the Chilean and Mexican countryside. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machin, S. (1996). Changes in the relative demand for skills. In Booth, A. & Snower, D. J. (Eds.), Acquiring skills: Market failures, their symptoms and policy responses (pp. 127146). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madero, C. C., & Takacs, E. A. (1991). Política nuclear argentina: Avance o retroceso? Buenos Aires: Instituto de Publicaciones Navales.Google Scholar
Maggetti, M. (2014). Institutional change and the evolution of the regulatory state: Evidence from the Swiss case. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 80(02), 276297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, E. D., Milner, H. V., & Rosendorff, B. P. (2000). Free to trade: Democracies, autocracies, and international trade. American Political Science Review, 94(02), 305321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maoz, Z. (2012). Preferential attachment, homophily, and the structure of international networks, 1816–2003. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 29(3), 341369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsden, P. V. (1983). Restricted access in networks and models of power. American Journal of Sociology, 88(04), 686717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, C. J. (2012). Political institutions and the origins of collective skill formation systems. In Busemeyer, M. R. & Trampusch, C. (Eds), The political economy of collective skill formation (pp. 4167). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maxfield, S., & Schneider, B. R. (1997). Business and the state in developing countries. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mayer, K. U., & Solga, H. (2008). Skill formation: Interdisciplinary and cross-national perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarty, N. (2014). Complexity, capacity, and capture. In Carpenter, D. and Moss, D. A. (Eds), Preventing regulatory capture: Special interest influence and how to limit it (pp. 99123). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(01), 415444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, K. M. (2009). Oil, nontax revenue, and the redistributional foundations of regime stability. International Organization, 63(01), 107138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murillo, M. V. (2000). From populism to neoliberalism: Labor unions and market reforms in Latin America. World Politics, 52(02), 135168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murillo, M. V. (2009). Political competition, partisanship, and policy making in Latin American public utilities. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murillo, M. V., & Mangonnet, J. (2013). La economía política de la Argentina exportadora en el nuevo milenio: Proponiendo una nueva agenda de investigación. Desarrollo Económico, 53(209–210), 223240.Google Scholar
Neumayer, E. (2001). How regime theory and the economic theory of international environmental cooperation can learn from each other. Global Environmental Politics, 1(1), 122147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niskanen, W. A. (2007). Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago: Aldine Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
O'Connell, P. J., & Jungblut, J.-M. (2008). What do we know about training at work? In Mayer, K. U. & Solga, H. (Eds), Skill formation: Interdisciplinary and cross-national perspectives (pp. 109125). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donnell, G. (1978). State and alliances in Argentina, 1956–1976. The Journal of Development Studies, 15(1), 333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2008). The challenge of common-pool resources. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 50(4), 821.Google Scholar
Pavnick, N. (2000). What explains skill upgrading in less developed countries? NBER Working Paper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pernetta, J. C., & Bewers, J. M. (2012). Transboundary diagnostic analysis in international waters interventions funded by the global environment facility. Ocean & Coastal Management, 55, 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pielke, R. A. (2007). The honest broker: Making sense of science in policy and politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, P. (1993). When effect becomes cause: Policy feedback and political change. World Politics, 45(04), 595628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, P. (2000). The limits of design: Explaining institutional origins and change. Governance, 13(4), 475499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, P. (2001). The new politics of the welfare state. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, K. T. (2005). Spatial models of parliamentary voting. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raleigh, C. (2010). Political marginalization, climate change, and conflict in African Sahel states. International Studies Review, 12(1), 6986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rauch, J. E., & Evans, P. B. (2000). Bureaucratic structure and bureaucratic performance in less developed countries. Journal of Public Economics, 75(1), 4971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raustiala, K. (2002). Architecture of international cooperation: Transgovernmental networks and the future of international law. The Virginia Journal of International Law, 43(1), 192.Google Scholar
Roett, R. (1983). Democracy and debt in South America: A continent's dilemma. Foreign Affairs, 62(03), 695720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohrschneider, R., & Dalton, R. J. (2002). A global network? Transnational cooperation among environmental groups. The Journal of Politics, 64(02), 510533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudra, N., & Jensen, N. M. (2011). Globalization and the politics of natural resources. Comparative Political Studies, 44(6), 639661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (1999). The advocacy coalition framework: An assessment. In Sabatier, P. A. (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (Vol. 118, p. 188). Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Sarkar, J. (2012). Big state, big science, big projects: The nuclear energy programme and state (un)-managerialism in India. Paper presented at the “Rising Powers and the Future of Global Governance” International Conference, University of Sussex.Google Scholar
Schiebinger, L. (1999). Has feminism changed science? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schiff, M., & Winters, L. A. (2002). Regional cooperation, and the role of international organizations and regional integration. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper (2872).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, B. R. (1999). The Desarrollista State in Brazil and Mexico. In Woo-Cumings, M. (Ed.), The developmental state (pp. 276305). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, B. R. (2013). Hierarchical capitalism in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, B. R., & Heredia, B. (2003). Reinventing Leviathan: The politics of administrative reform in developing countries. Miami: North-South Center Press.Google Scholar
Scholz, J. T., Berardo, R., & Kile, B. (2008). Do networks solve collective action problems? Credibility, search, and collaboration. The Journal of Politics, 70(02), 393406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrank, A. (2009). Professionalization and probity in a patrimonial state: Labor inspectors in the Dominican Republic. Latin American Politics and Society, 51(2), 91115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrank, A. (2014). The German roots of Latin American vocational training institution. Paper presented at the Red para el Estudio de la Economía Política de América Latina (REPAL), Santiago, Chile.Google Scholar
Schrank, A., & Whitford, J. (2011). The anatomy of network failure. Sociological Theory, 29(3), 151177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartzman, S. (1994). Brazil scientists and the state-evolving models and the “Great leap forward.” In Solingen, E. (Ed.), Scientists and the state: Domestic structures and the international context (pp. 171188). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Scott, J. (2000). Social network analysis: A handbook. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
Sikkink, K. (1991). Ideas and institutions: Developmentalism in Brazil and Argentina. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Simmons, B. A., & Hopkins, D. J. (2005). The constraining power of international treaties: Theory and methods. American Political Science Review, 99(04), 623631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slaughter, A.-M. (2004). A new world order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Slaughter, M. J. (2002). Skill upgrading in developing countries: Has inward foreign direct investment played a role? Working Paper 192. OECD Development Center, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Solingen, E. (1994). Scientists and the state: Domestic structures and the international context. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solingen, E. (1996). Industrial policy, technology, and international bargaining: Designing nuclear industries in Argentina and Brazil. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Stephenson, P. J., & Baharani, M. L. (2012). Evaluation techniques applied to large-scale regional projects. In De Lombaerde, P., Flores, R., Iapadre, L., & Schulz, M. (Eds.), The regional integration manual: Quantitative and qualitative methods (pp. 270296). New York: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
Streeck, W. (2012). Skills and politics: General and specific. In Busemeyer, M. R. & Trampusch, C. (Eds.), The political economy of collective skill formation (pp. 317352). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tarrow, S. (2005). The new transnational activism. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor-Robinson, M. M., & Heath, R. M. (2003). Do women legislators have different policy priorities than their male colleagues? A critical case test. Women & Politics, 24(4), 77101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teodoro, M. P. (2011). Bureaucratic ambition: Careers, motives, and the innovative administrator. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, K. (2004). How institutions evolve: The political economy of skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, K. (2009). Institutional change in advanced political economies. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 47(3), 471498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, K. (2014). Varieties of liberalization and the new politics of social solidarity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, K., Longstreth, F., & Steinmo, S. (1992). Structuring politics: Historical institutionalism in comparative analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thurner, P. W., & Binder, M. (2009). European Union transgovernmental networks: The emergence of a new political space beyond the nation‐state? European Journal of Political Research, 48(1), 80106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treier, S., & Jackman, S. (2008). Democracy as a latent variable. American Journal of Political Science, 52(1), 201217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulph, D. (1996). Dynamic competition for market share and the failure of the market for skilled labour. In Booth, A. L. & Snower, D. J. (Eds.), Acquiring skills: Market failures, their symptoms and policy responses (pp. 81108). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velho, L. (2005). S&T institutions in Latin America and the Caribbean: An overview. Science and Public Policy, 32(2), 95108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Videras, J. (2013). Social networks and the environment. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 5(1), 211226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Bülow, M. (2010). Building transnational networks: Civil society and the politics of trade in the Americas. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vreeland, J. R. (2003). The IMF and economic development. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walton, M. (2004). Neoliberalism in Latin America: Good, bad, or incomplete? Latin American Research Review, 39(3), 165183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasmer, E. (2006). General versus specific skills in labor markets with search frictions and firing costs. The American Economic Review, 96(3), 811831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, M. (1958). From Max Weber: Essays in sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Webster, F. (2006). The Information Society revisited. In Lievrouw, L. A. & Livingstone, S. (Eds.), Handbook of new media: Social shaping and consequences of ICTs (pp. 443457). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Weyland, K. G. (2002). The politics of market reform in fragile democracies: Argentina, Brazil, Peru, and Venezuela. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyland, K. G., Madrid, R. L., & Hunter, W. (2010). Leftist governments in Latin America: Successes and shortcoming. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wibbels, E. (2006). Dependency revisited: International markets, business cycles, and social spending in the developing world. International Organization, 60(02), 433468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank (2012). World Development Indicators 2012. Washington DC: World Bank Publications.Google Scholar
Wrobel, P. S., & Redick, J. R. (1998). Nuclear cooperation in South America: The role of scientists in the Argentine‐Brazilian rapprochement. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 866(1), 165181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, Z. (2002). A new green order? The World Bank and the politics of the Global Environment Facility. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Isabella Alcañiz, University of Maryland, College Park
  • Book: Environmental and Nuclear Networks in the Global South
  • Online publication: 05 August 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316576717.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Isabella Alcañiz, University of Maryland, College Park
  • Book: Environmental and Nuclear Networks in the Global South
  • Online publication: 05 August 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316576717.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Isabella Alcañiz, University of Maryland, College Park
  • Book: Environmental and Nuclear Networks in the Global South
  • Online publication: 05 August 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316576717.011
Available formats
×