Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-gtgcz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-18T07:48:20.635Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Climate change, global environmental justice and international environmental law

from Part IV - North–South concerns in global contexts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2009

By
Jutta Brunnée
Edited by
Jonas Ebbesson  and
Phoebe Okowa
Jonas Ebbesson
Affiliation:
Stockholms Universitet
Phoebe Okowa
Affiliation:
Queen Mary University of London
Get access

Summary

[W]e need to be constantly skeptical of the universalist ‘we’ who talks loftily about the principles of global justice.

Andrew Hurrell

I don't find justice either a useful decision-making tool or a recognizable objective for international law.

Judge Rosalyn Higgins

[I]nternational law exists as a promise of justice.

Martti Koskenniemi

[T]he future will see increasing efforts to form international [environmental] regimes, often with profound effects on nonparticipants…Principles of global justice…are going to be among the most important topics of the new world.

Christopher D. Stone

Introduction

Climate change is a global problem. The emission of greenhouse gases or destruction of carbon sinks anywhere in the world affects the Earth's climate. Similarly, while the nature and severity of impacts may vary geographically, no state can insulate itself from the consequences of global climate change. Climate change is also an inter-temporal problem. The actions and omissions of the present will have implications for climatic conditions in the future, just as activities undertaken in the past have had impacts on today's climate. Historically, emissions of greenhouse gases have been far greater in the industrialized countries. The emissions of Northern countries still significantly exceed those of developing countries, although the emissions share of the developing world and the emissions of some large developing countries are projected to rise sharply over the next two decades. The impacts of climate change are likely to disproportionately affect Southern, developing countries, many of which are especially vulnerable to such impacts.

Type
Chapter
Information
Environmental Law and Justice in Context , pp. 316 - 332
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adger, W. N., 2001. ‘Scales of Governance and Environmental Justice for Adaptation and Mitigation of Climate Change’. 13 Journal of International Development921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adger, W. N., Paavola, J., Huq, S., and Mace, M. J. (eds.), 2006. Fairness in Adaptation to Climate Change. Boston: MIT Press.
Anand, R., 2002. ‘International Environmental Justice: A North–South Dimension’. 1 International Journal of Politics and Ethics241.Google Scholar
Barnett, K., and Duvall, J. (eds.), 2005. Power in Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barry, B., 1998. ‘International Society from a Cosmopolitan Perspective’, in Mapel, David R. and Nardin, Terry (eds.), International Society: Diverse Ethical Perspectives. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Baumert, K., and Pershing, J., 2004. Climate Data: Insights and Observations. Washington, DC: Pew Center on Global Climate Change.Google Scholar
Beitz, C., 1979 and 1999. Political Theory and International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Beitz, C., 1999. ‘International Liberalism and Distributive Justice: A Survey of Recent Thought’. 51 World Politics269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biermann, F., 1999. ‘Justice in the Greenhouse: Perspectives from International Law’, in Tóth, F. (ed.), Fair Weather? Equity Concerns in Climate Change. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Biniaz, S., 2002. ‘Common But Differentiated Responsibility – Remarks’, in Proceedings of the Annual Meeting. American Society of International Law.Google Scholar
Brunnée, J., 2002. ‘Coping with Consent: Lawmaking under Multilateral Environmental Agreements’. 15 Leiden Journal of International Law1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunnée, J., and Toope, S. J., 1997. ‘Environmental Security and Freshwater Resources: Ecosystem Regime Building’. 91 American Journal of International Law26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunnée, J., and Toope, S. J., 2000. ‘International Law and Constructivism: Elements of an Interactional Theory of International Law’. 39 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law19.Google Scholar
Brunnée, J., and Toope, S. J., 2001. ‘Interactional International Law’. 3 International Law FORUM de droit international186.
Buchanan, A., 2004. Justice, Legitimacy and Self-Determination: Moral Foundations for International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Caney, S., 2005. ‘Cosmopolitan Justice, Responsibility, and Global Climate Change’. 18 Leiden Journal of International Law747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, M., 1985. ‘Moral Skepticism and International Relations’, in Beitz, Charles R., Cohen, Marshall and Simmons, A. John (eds.), International Ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cullet, P., 2003. Differential Treatment in International Environmental Law. Brookfield, VT: Ashgate Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Franck, T. M., 1995. Fairness in International Law and Institutions. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
French, D., 2000. ‘Developing States and International Environmental Law: The Importance of Differentiated Responsibilities’. 49 International and Comparative Law Quarterly35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, L. L., 1969. The Morality of Law. revised edn, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gardiner, S. M., 2004. ‘Ethics and Global Climate Change’. 114 Ethics555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, J., 2000a. ‘North–South Aspects of the Climate Change Issue: Towards a Negotiating Theory and Strategy for Developing Countries’. 3 International Journal of Sustainable Development115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, J., 2000b. Climate Change: Regime Development and Treaty Implementation in the Context of Unequal Power Relations. Amsterdam: Institute for Environmental Studies.Google Scholar
Hall, S., 2001. ‘The Persistent Spectre: Natural Law, International Order and the Limits of Legal Positivism’. 12 European Journal of International Law269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanqin, X., 2003. Transboundary Damage in International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harper, K., and Rajan, S. R., 2004. ‘International Environmental Justice: Building the Natural Assets of the World's Poor’, Working Paper No. 87, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts Amherst.Google Scholar
Higgins, R., 2006. Plenary Address to the 2006 Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law (Theme: ‘A Just World Under Law’), Washington, DC, 31 March 2006 (notes on file with author).Google Scholar
Hurrell, A., 2001. ‘Global Inequality and International Institutions’. 32 Metaphilosophy34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikeme, J., 2003. ‘Equity, Environmental Justice and Sustainability: Incomplete Approaches in Climate Change Policies’. 13 Global Environmental Politics195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, M., 2003. ‘What Is International Law For?’, in Evans, Malcolm D. (ed.), International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 89–114.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M., 2005. From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument. Reissue with a new Epilogue, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Krisch, N., 2005. ‘International Law in Times of Hegemony: Unequal Power and the Shaping of the International Legal Order’. 16 European Journal of International Law369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kukathas, C., 2006. ‘The Mirage of Global Justice’. 23 Social Philosophy and Policy1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kütting, G., 2004. ‘Environmental Justice. Book Review Essay’. 4 Global Environmental Politics115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linklater, A., 1999. ‘The Evolving Spheres of International Justice’. 75 International Affairs473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linnerooth-Bayer, J., 1999. ‘Climate Change and Multiple Views of Fairness’, in Toth, F. (ed.), Fair Weather? Equity Concerns in Climate Change. London, Earthscan.Google Scholar
Melkas, E., 2002. ‘Sovereignty and Equity within the Framework of the Climate Change Regime’. 11 Review of European Community and International Environmental Law115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mickelson, K., 2000. ‘South, North, International Environmental Law, and International Environmental Lawyers’. 11 Yearbook International Environmental Law52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mickelson, K., 2007. ‘Critical Approaches’, in Bodansky, Daniel, Brunnée, Jutta and Hey, Ellen (eds.), Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, D., 1999. ‘Justice and Global Inequality’, in Andrew, Hurrell and Ngaire, Woods (eds.), Inequality, Globalization and World Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, C., 2005. ‘Lon Fuller and the Moral Value of the Rule of Law’. 24 Law and Philosophy239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Najam, S., 2004. ‘The View from the South: Developing Countries in Global Environmental Politics’, in Axelrod, Regina S., Downie, David Leonard and Vig, Norman J. (eds.), The Global Environment: Institutions, Law and Policy. 2nd edn, Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Paavola, J., and Adger, W. N., 2002. ‘Justice and Adaptation to Climate Change’, Tyndall Centre Working Paper 23.
Pallemaerts, M., 2003. ‘International Law and Sustainable Development: Any Progress in Johannesburg?’. 12 Review of European Community and International Environmental Law1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pogge, T., 2002. World Poverty and Human Rights. Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Rajamani, L., 2000. ‘The Principle of Common But Differentiated Responsibility and the Balance of Commitments under the Climate Regime’. 9 Review of European Community and International Environmental Law120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajamani, L., 2003. ‘From Stockholm to Johannesburg: The Anatomy of Dissonance in the International Environmental Regime’. 12 Review of European Community and International Environmental Law23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J., 1971/1999. A Theory of Justice. Revised edn, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J., 1999. The Law of People. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J., 2001. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. T., and Parks, B. C., 2007. A Climate of Injustice, Global Inequality, North South Politics and Climate Policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Shelton, D., 2007. ‘Equity’, in Daniel, Bodansky, Jutta, Brunnée and Ellen, Hey (eds.), Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 639.Google Scholar
Shue, H., 1992. ‘The Unavoidability of Justice’, in Hurrell, Andrew and Kingsbury, Benedict (eds.), The International Politics of the Environment: Actors, Interests, and Institutions. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 373.Google Scholar
Shue, H., 1999. ‘Global Environment and International Inequality’. 75 International Affairs531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shukla, P. R., 1999. ‘Justice, Equity and Efficiency in Climate Change: A Developing Country Perspective’, in Tóth, F. (ed.), Fair Weather? Equity Concerns in Climate Change. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Stone, C. D., 1993. The Gnat Is Older Than Man: Global Environment and Human Agenda. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stone, C. D., 2004. ‘Common But Differentiated Responsibilities in International Law’. 98 American Journal of International Law276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walzer, M., 1983. Spheres of Justice. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wight, M., 1966. ‘Why Is There No International Theory?’, in Herbert, Butterfield and Martin, Wight (eds.), Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Young, I. M., 2006. ‘Responsibility and Global Justice: A Social Connection Model’. 23 Social Philosophy and Policy102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×