Book contents
- Escaping From PredatorsAn Integrative View of Escape Decisions
- Escaping From Predators
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Book part
- Part I Overview and behaviors preceding and following initiation of escape
- 1 Escape behavior: importance, scope, and variables
- Part II Escape and refuge use: theory and findings for major taxonomic groups
- Part III Related behaviors and other factors influencing escape
- Part IV The application and study of escape
- Index
- References
1 - Escape behavior: importance, scope, and variables
from Part I - Overview and behaviors preceding and following initiation of escape
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2015
Book contents
- Escaping From PredatorsAn Integrative View of Escape Decisions
- Escaping From Predators
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Book part
- Part I Overview and behaviors preceding and following initiation of escape
- 1 Escape behavior: importance, scope, and variables
- Part II Escape and refuge use: theory and findings for major taxonomic groups
- Part III Related behaviors and other factors influencing escape
- Part IV The application and study of escape
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Escaping From PredatorsAn Integrative View of Escape Decisions, pp. 3 - 14Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
Camp, R. J., Sinton, D. T. & Knight, R. L. (1997). Viewsheds: A complementary management approach to buffer zones. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 25, 612–615.Google Scholar
Caro, T. M. (2005). Antipredator Defenses in Birds and Mammals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Endler, J. A. (1986). Defense against predators. In Predator–prey Relationships: Perspectives and Approaches from the Study of Lower Vertebrates. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 109–134.Google Scholar
Fernández-Juricic, E., Jimenez, M. D. & Lucas, E. (2002). Factors affecting intra- and inter-specific variations in the difference between alert distances and flight distances for birds in forested habitats. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 80, 1212–1220.Google Scholar
Gehlbach, F. R. & Leverett, J. S. (1995). Mobbing of eastern screech-owls: Predatory cues, risks to mobbers, and degree of threat. Condor, 97, 831–834.Google Scholar
Lima, S. L. & Dill, L. M. (1990). Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 68, 619–640.Google Scholar
Owings, D. H. (1977). Snake mobbing by California ground squirrels: Adaptive variation and ontogeny. Behaviour, 62, 50–69.Google Scholar
Robinson, M. J., Abele, L. G. & Robinson, B (1970). Attack autotomy: A defense against predators. Science, 169, 300–301.Google Scholar
Ruxton, G. D., Sherratt, T. N. & Speed, M. (2004). Avoiding Attack: The Evolutionary Ecology of Crypsis, Warning Signals and Mimicry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stevens, M. & Merilaita, S. (2011). Animal Camouflage: Mechanisms and Function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. R. & Knight, R. L. (2003). Behavioral responses of wildlife to human activity: Terminology and methods. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 32, 1263–1271.Google Scholar
Ydenberg, R. C. & Dill, L. M. (1986). The economics of fleeing from predators. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 16, 229–249.Google Scholar
- 21
- Cited by