Book contents
- Escaping From PredatorsAn Integrative View of Escape Decisions
- Escaping From Predators
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Book part
- Part I Overview and behaviors preceding and following initiation of escape
- Part II Escape and refuge use: theory and findings for major taxonomic groups
- Part III Related behaviors and other factors influencing escape
- 10 Vigilance, alarm calling, pursuit deterrence, and predation inspection
- 11 Determinants of lizard escape performance: decision, motivation, ability, and opportunity
- 12 Sensory systems and escape behavior
- 13 The physiology of escape
- 14 Maternal and genetic effects on escape: a prospective review
- 15 The personality of escape
- Part IV The application and study of escape
- Index
- References
12 - Sensory systems and escape behavior
from Part III - Related behaviors and other factors influencing escape
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2015
Book contents
- Escaping From PredatorsAn Integrative View of Escape Decisions
- Escaping From Predators
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Book part
- Part I Overview and behaviors preceding and following initiation of escape
- Part II Escape and refuge use: theory and findings for major taxonomic groups
- Part III Related behaviors and other factors influencing escape
- 10 Vigilance, alarm calling, pursuit deterrence, and predation inspection
- 11 Determinants of lizard escape performance: decision, motivation, ability, and opportunity
- 12 Sensory systems and escape behavior
- 13 The physiology of escape
- 14 Maternal and genetic effects on escape: a prospective review
- 15 The personality of escape
- Part IV The application and study of escape
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Escaping From PredatorsAn Integrative View of Escape Decisions, pp. 322 - 342Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
Beauchamp, G. (2014). Social Predation: How Group Living Benefits Predators and Prey. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, G. & Ruxton, G. D. (2007). False alarms and the evolution of antipredator vigilance. Animal Behaviour, 74, 1199–1206.Google Scholar
Bisley, J. W. (2011). The neural basis of visual attention. Journal of Physiology, 589, 49–57.Google Scholar
Blackwell, B. F., Fernández-Juricic, E., Seamans, T. W. & Dolan, T. (2009). Avian visual system configuration and behavioural response to object approach. Animal Behaviour, 77, 673–684.Google Scholar
Blumstein, D. T. (2010). Flush early and avoid the rush: a general rule of antipredator behavior? Behavioral Ecology, 21, 440–442.Google Scholar
Blumstein, D. T., Fernández-Juricic, E., Zollner, P. A. & Garity, S. C. (2005). Inter-specific variation in avian responses to human disturbance. Journal of Applied Ecology, 42, 943–953.Google Scholar
Bowmaker, J. K. (1990). Visual pigments of fishes. In Douglas, R. H. & Djamgoz, M. B. A. (eds.) The Visual System of Fish. London: Chapman and Hall, pp. 81–104.Google Scholar
Camhi, J. M., Tom, W. & Volman, S. (1978). The escape behavior of the cockroach Periplaneta americana. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 12, 203–212.Google Scholar
Carlile, P. A., Peters, R. A. & Evans, C. S. (2006). Detection of a looming stimulus by the Jacky dragon: Selective sensitivity to characteristics of an aerial predator. Animal Behaviour, 72, 553–562.Google Scholar
Caro, T. (2005). Antipredator Defenses in Birds and Mammals. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, W. E. Jr. (2008). Visual monitoring of predators: occurrence, cost and benefit for escape. Animal Behaviour, 76, 1365–1372.Google Scholar
Cooper, W. E. Jr. & Blumstein, D. T. (2014). Novel effects of monitoring predators on costs of fleeing and not fleeing explain flushing early in economic escape theory. Behavioral Ecology, 25, 44–52.Google Scholar
Cooper, W. E. Jr. & Frederick, W. G. (2007). Optimal flight initiation distance. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 244, 59–67.Google Scholar
Cresswell, W., Quinn, J. L., Whittingham, M. J. & Butler, S. (2003). Good foragers can also be good at detecting predators. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 270, 1069–1076.Google Scholar
Cresswell, W., Butler, S., Whittingham, M. J. & Quinn, J. L. (2009). Very short delays prior to escape from potential predators may function efficiently as adaptive risk-assessment periods. Behaviour, 146, 795–813.Google Scholar
Cronin, T. W. (2005). The visual ecology of predator–prey interactions. In Barbosa, P. & Castellanos, I. (eds.) Ecology of Predator–prey Interactions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 105–138.Google Scholar
Devereux, C. L., Whittingham, M. J., Fernández-Juricic, E., Vickery, J. A. & Krebs, J. R. (2006). Predator detection and avoidance by starlings under differing scenarios of predation risk. Behavioral Ecology, 17, 303–309.Google Scholar
Dolan, T. & Fernández-Juricic, E. (2010). Retinal ganglion cell topography of five species of ground-foraging birds. Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 75, 111–121.Google Scholar
Dukas, R. (2002). Behavioural and ecological consequences of limited attention. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 357, 1539–1547.Google Scholar
Dukas, R. & Kamil, A. C. (2000). The cost of limited attention in blue jays. Behavioral Ecology, 11, 502–506.Google Scholar
Dumont, F., Pasquaretta, C., Réale, D., Bogliani, G. & von Hardenberg, A. (2012). Flight initiation distance and starting distance: Biological effect or mathematical artefact? Ethology, 118, 1051–1062.Google Scholar
Engelage, J. & Bischof, H.-J. (1988). Enucleation enhances ipsilateral flash evoked respones in the ectostriatum of the zebra finch (Taeniopyia guttata castanotis Gould). Experimental Brain Research, 70, 79–89.Google Scholar
Fernández-Juricic, E. (2012). Sensory basis of vigilance behavior in birds: Synthesis and future prospects. Behavioural Processes, 89, 143–152.Google Scholar
Fernández-Juricic, E. & Schroeder, N. (2003). Do variations in scanning behavior affect tolerance to human disturbance? Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 84, 219–234.Google Scholar
Fernández-Juricic, E., Erichsen, J. T. & Kacelnik, A. (2004). Visual perception and social foraging in birds. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 19, 25–31.Google Scholar
Fernández-Juricic, E., Gall, M. D., Dolan, T., Tisdale, V. & Martin, G. R. (2008). The visual fields of two ground-foraging birds, house finches and house sparrows, allow for simultaneous foraging and anti-predator vigilance. Ibis, 150, 779–787.Google Scholar
Fernández-Juricic, E., Gall, M. D., Dolan, T. et al. (2011a). Visual systems and vigilance behaviour of two ground-foraging avian prey species: White-crowned sparrows and California towhees. Animal Behaviour, 81, 705–713.Google Scholar
Fernández-Juricic, E., Beauchamp, G., Treminio, R. & Hoover, M. (2011b). Making heads turn: Association between head movements during vigilance and perceived predation risk in brown-headed cowbird flocks. Animal Behaviour, 82, 573–577.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, T. H. & Butler, B. K. (2005). Color vision of the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus): Hue matches, tetrachromacy, and intensity discrimination. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 191, 933–951.Google Scholar
Green, R., Carr, W. J. & Green, M. (1968). The hawk-goose phenomenon: Further confirmation and a search for the releaser. Journal of Psychology, 69, 271–276.Google Scholar
Guillemain, M., Martin, G. R. & Fritz, H. (2002). Feeding methods, visual fields and vigilance in dabbling ducks (Anatidae). Functional Ecology, 16, 522–529.Google Scholar
Hart, N. S. (2001a). The visual ecology of avian photoreceptors. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research, 20, 675–703.Google Scholar
Hart, N. S. (2001b). Variations in cone photoreceptor abundance and the visual ecology of birds. Journal Of Comparative Physiology A, 187, 685–698.Google Scholar
Hart, N., Partridge, J. & Cuthill, I. (1998). Visual pigments, oil droplets and cone photoreceptor distribution in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris). Journal of Experimental Biology, 201, 1433–1446.Google Scholar
Hassenstein, B. & Hustert, R. (1999). Hiding responses of locusts to approaching objects. Journal of Experimental Biology, 202, 1701–1710.Google Scholar
Hasson, O. (2000). Knowledge, information, biases and signal assemblages. In Espmark, Y., Amundsen, T. & Rosenqvist, G. (eds.) Animal Signals: Signalling and Signal Design in Animal Communication. Trondheim: Tapir Academic Press, pp. 445–463.Google Scholar
Healy, K., McNally, L., Ruxton, G. D., Cooper, N. & Jackson, A. L. (2013). Metabolic rate and body size are linked with perception of temporal information. Animal Behaviour, 86, 685–696.Google Scholar
Hughes, A. (1977). The topography of vision in mammals of contrasting life style: Comparative optics and retinal organisation. In Crescittelli, F. (ed.) Handbook of Sensory Physiology. New York: Springer, pp. 613–756.Google Scholar
Jones, K. A., Krebs, J. R. & Whittingham, M. J. (2007). Vigilance in the third dimension: Head movement not scan duration varies in response to different predator models. Animal Behaviour, 74, 1181–1187.Google Scholar
Kaby, U. & Lind, J. (2003). What limits predator detection in blue tits (Parus caeruleus): Posture, task or orientation? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 54, 534–538.Google Scholar
Kastner, S. & Ungerleider, L. G. (2000). Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23, 315–341.Google Scholar
Kiltie, R. A. (2000). Scaling of visual acuity with body size in mammals and birds. Functional Ecology, 14, 226–234.Google Scholar
Land, M. F. (1999). Motion and vision: Why animals move their eyes. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 185, 341–352.Google Scholar
Lappin, J. S., Tadin, D., Nyquist, J. B. & Corn, A. L. (2009). Spatial and temporal limits of motion perception across variations in speed, eccentricity, and low vision. Journal of Vision, 9, 1–14.Google Scholar
Legge, G. E. (1978). Sustained and transient mechanisms in human vision: Temporal and spatial properties. Vision Research, 18, 69–81.Google Scholar
Lima, S. L. (1987). Vigilance while feeding and its relation to the risk of predation. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 124, 303–316.Google Scholar
Lima, S. L. & Bednekoff, P. A. (1999). Back to the basics of antipredatory vigilance: Can nonvigilant animals detect attack? Animal Behaviour, 58, 537–543.Google Scholar
Lima, S. L. & Dill, L. M. (1990). Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 68, 619–634.Google Scholar
Lima, S. L., Wiebe, K. L. & Dill, L. M. (1987). Protective cover and the use of space by finches: is closer better? Oikos, 50, 225–230.Google Scholar
Magal, C., Dangles, O., Caparroy, P. & Casas, J. (2006). Hair canopy of cricket sensory system tuned to predator signals. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 241, 459–66.Google Scholar
Magurran, A. E. & Girling, S. L. (1986). Predator model recognition and response habituation in shoaling minnows. Animal Behaviour, 34, 510–518.Google Scholar
Martin, G. R. (2014). The subtlety of simple eyes: The tuning of visual fields to perceptual challenges in birds. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 369, 20130040.Google Scholar
McIlwain, J. T. (1996). An Introduction to the Biology of Vision. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Milinski, M. (1990). Information overload and food selection. In Hughes, R. N. (ed.) Behavioural Mechanisms of Food Selection. Berlin: Springer, pp. 721–737.Google Scholar
Misslin, R. (2003). The defense system of fear: behavior and neurocircuitry. Clinical Nerophysiology, 33, 55–66.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, J. D., Dreher, B., Hopkins, C. S., McCall, M. J. & Brown, M. (1988). Peak density and distributions of ganglion cells in the retinae of microchiropteran bats: Implications for visual acuity. Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 32, 39–56.Google Scholar
Phelps, S. M. (2007). Sensory ecology and perceptual allocation: New prospects for neural networks. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 362, 355–367.Google Scholar
Quinn, J. & Cresswell, W. (2005). Escape response delays in wintering redshank, Tringa totanus, flocks: Perceptual limits and economic decisions. Animal Behaviour, 69, 1285–1292.Google Scholar
Randolet, J., Lucas, J. R. & Fernández-Juricic, E. (2014). Non-redundant social information use in avian flocks with multisensory stimuli. Ethology, 120, 375–387.Google Scholar
Regan, D. & Vincent, A. (1995). Visual processing of looming and time to contact throughout the visual field. Vision Research, 35, 1845–1857.Google Scholar
Roth, T. C. & Lima, S. L. (2007). The predatory behavior of wintering Accipiter hawks: Temporal patterns in activity of predators and prey. Oecologia, 152, 169–178.Google Scholar
Schaller, G. B. & Emlen, J. T. (1962). The ontogeny of avoidance behaviour in some precocial birds. Animal Behaviour, 10, 370–381.Google Scholar
Schiff, W. (1965). Perception of impending collision: A study of visual directed avoidant behavior. Psychological Monographs, 79, 1–26.Google Scholar
Tisdale, V. & Fernández-Juricic, E. (2009). Vigilance and predator detection vary between avian species with different visual acuity and coverage. Behavioral Ecology, 20, 936–945.Google Scholar
Tyrrell, L. P., Butler, S. R., Yorzinski, J. L. & Fernández-Juricic, E. (2014). A novel system for bi-ocular eye-tracking in vertebrates with laterally placed eyes. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 5, 1070–1077.Google Scholar
Von Campenhausen, M. & Kirschfeld, K. (1998). Spectral sensitivity of the accessory optic system of the pigeon. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 183, 1–6.Google Scholar
Voss, J. & Bischof, H.-J. (2003). Regulation of ipsilateral visual information within the tectofugal visual system in zebra finches. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 189, 545–553.Google Scholar
Ydenberg, R. C. & Dill, L. M. (1986). The economics of fleeing from predators. Advances in the Study of Behaviour, 16, 229–249.Google Scholar
Yorzinski, J. L. & Platt, M. L. (2014). Selective attention in peacocks during predator detection. Animal Cognition, 17, 767–777.Google Scholar
Zani, A. & Proverbio, A. M. (2012). Is that a belt or a snake? Object attentional selection affects the early stages of visual sensory processing. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 8, 6.Google Scholar
- 11
- Cited by