Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-09T17:08:12.347Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

13 - Watching not waiting: surveillance and epidemiological intelligence

Penny Webb
Affiliation:
Queensland Institute of Medical Research
Chris Bain
Affiliation:
University of Queensland
Get access

Summary

Box 13.1 A timeline of events during the identification of the 2002–3 SARS epidemic

November 2002: two GOARN (Global Alert and Response Network) partners, the WHO Global Influenza Surveillance Network and the US Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System, noted media reports of influenza in China.

December 2002: an influenza B epidemic was virologically confirmed by Chinese authorities. In retrospect those early media reports were probably also the first indication of SARS, which also erupted at that time as seemingly unrelated clusters of atypical pneumonia in the south of China (atypical pneumonia is common in that region each winter).

20 February, 2003: Hong Kong confirmed two human cases of much-feared avian influenza (H5N1). This was soon after the Chinese government had reported that the atypical pneumonia had been unusually lethal in many cases.

21 February, 2003: just as the WHO prepared for an influenza pandemic, a Chinese doctor was admitted to a local Hong Kong hospital; staff adopted strict precautions against bird influenza but he had already infected several people at the hotel he occupied the night before. They spread the virus to other hospitals, the Hong Kong community, Canada, Vietnam and Singapore.

12 March, 2003: GOARN had gathered enough data from those countries and Hong Kong for the WHO to issue its first global alert.

15 March, 2003: the disease was given the name severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). GOARN then linked laboratory scientists, clinicians and epidemiologists all over the world.

July 2003: the causative agent, incubation period, infectious period and usual modes of transmission had been determined, good diagnostic tests and surveillance and control programmes had been devised and implemented, and human transmission ceased.

(From Heyman and Rodier, 2003.)
Type
Chapter
Information
Essential Epidemiology
An Introduction for Students and Health Professionals
, pp. 307 - 322
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

,Anonymous. (2004). Progress toward poliomyelitis eradication – India, 2003. Morbidity Mortality Weekly Report, 53: 238–241.Google Scholar
Beresford, J., Colin-Jones, D. G., Flind, A. C. et al. (1998). Postmarketing surveillance of the safety of cimetidine: 15-year mortality report. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 7: 319–322.Google Scholar
,CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). (2001). Updated guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems: recommendations from the guidelines working group. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 50 (No. RR-13): page 2.Google Scholar
Doll, R. (1974). Surveillance and monitoring. International Journal of Epidemiology, 3: 305–313.Google Scholar
Heyman, D. L. and Rodier, G. (2003). Global surveillance, national surveillance, and SARS. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 10: 173–175. Available from www.cdc.gov/ncidod/EID/ vol10no2/03–1038.htm.Google Scholar
Jimenez, S. A. and Varga, J. (1991). The eosinophilia–myalgia syndrome and eosinophilic fasciitis. Current Opinion in Rheumatology, 3: 986–994.Google Scholar
Samaan, G., Patel, M., Lolwokure, B., Roces, M. C., Oshitani, H. and the World Health Organization Outbreak Response Team. (2005). Rumor surveillance and avian influenza H5N1. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 11: 463–466.Google Scholar
Vyse, A. J., Gay, N. J., White, M. E. et al. (2002). Evolution of surveillance of measles, mumps and rubella in England and Wales: providing the platform for evidence-based vaccination policy. Epidemiologic Reviews, 24: 125–136.Google Scholar
,WHO (World Health Organization). (2002). The World Health Report 2002. Reducing Risks, Promoting Healthy Life. Geneva: World Health Organization.
,WHO (World Health Organization). (2008). International Health Regulations (2005). Second Edition. Geneva: World Health Organization.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×