Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T16:08:11.828Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Assisted reproductive technologies

from Part III - Controversies in health care ethics: treatment choices at the beginning and at the end of life

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2016

John C. Moskop
Affiliation:
Wake Forest University, North Carolina
Get access

Summary

Case example

Thirty-year-old Mr. Edward Dawson, an investment manager in a large bank, collapses one afternoon in his office. His assistant immediately calls 911. Emergency medical technicians respond rapidly, recognize that Mr. Dawson is in cardiac arrest, begin cardiopulmonary resuscitation, intubate Mr. Dawson, and transport him to nearby Downtown Medical Center, where he is placed on a ventilator and admitted to the medical intensive care unit. Physical examination and diagnostic imaging reveal that he has suffered a severe anoxic brain injury, and he does not regain consciousness. Eight weeks later, Mr. Dawson's medical condition is unchanged. A consulting neurologist informs his wife that, although he does not satisfy all of the neurologic criteria for the determination of death, his brain injury is extensive and irreversible. The neurologist explains that it is highly unlikely that Mr. Dawson will ever regain consciousness or the ability to breathe on his own.

Mr. Dawson had been married just four months before this accident. Dr. Milam, his attending physician, offers Mrs. Dawson the option that ventilator support be withdrawn and Mr. Dawson be allowed to die. Mrs. Dawson agrees with this treatment plan, but requests that, before the ventilator is withdrawn, her husband's sperm be recovered for artificial insemination at a later date. She reports that they had intended to have children in the course of the marriage, and that she would like to fulfill that goal. How should Dr. Milam respond?

Overcoming infertility

Reproduction is, of course, a natural process essential for the survival of any biological species, but not all individual organisms have the ability or the opportunity to reproduce. For most human beings, reproduction is also a life-changing event with great personal and moral significance. People who desire children and who experience difficulty reproducing may therefore seek medical assistance in achieving that goal. Human infertility is, in fact, a relatively common condition. According to a US National Survey of Family Growth conducted between 2006 and 2010, 6 percent of all married women aged 15–44 (1.5 million women) were infertile, where infertility was defined as having been sexually active without using contraceptive measures over the past twelve months and not having become pregnant. In the same survey, 11.5 percent of all men aged 25–44 who were not surgically sterile reported inability or difficulty fathering a child.

Type
Chapter
Information
Ethics and Health Care
An Introduction
, pp. 163 - 178
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arras, John D. 2003. Reproductive technology. In Frey, R.G. and Wellman, Christopher Heath (eds.) A Companion to Applied Ethics. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing: 342–355.Google Scholar
Caplan, Arthur L. 1997. And baby makes – moral muddles. In Am I My Brother's Keeper?Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press: 3–21.Google Scholar
Furger, Franco and Fukuyama, Francis. 2007. A proposal for modernizing the regulation of human biotechnologies. Hastings Center Report 37(4): 16–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robertson, John A. 2007. The virtues of muddling through. Hastings Center Report 37(4): 26–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, Gladys B. 1998. Crisis in assisted conception: the British approach to an American dilemma. Journal of Women's Health 7: 321–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×