Telling right from wrong often requires appeal to a set of values. Some values are general or global, and they range across the spectrum of human endeavor. Identifying and ranking such values, and being clear about their conflicts and exceptions, is an important philosophical undertaking. Other values are particular or local. They may be special cases of the general values. So when “freedom from pain” is offered in the essay by Professors Bynum and Fodor as a medical value, it is conceptually linked to freedom, a general value. Local values apply within and often among different human actions: law, medicine, engineering, journalism, computing, education, business, and so forth. To be consistent, a commitment to a value in any of these domains should not contradict global values. To be sure, tension between and among local and global values is the stuff of exciting debate in applied ethics. And sometimes a particular local value will point to consequences that are at odds with a general value. Debates over these tensions likewise inform the burgeoning literature in applied or professional ethics. In this chapter, Bynum and Fodor apply the seminal work of James H. Moor in an analysis of the values that apply in the health professions. What emerges is a straightforward perspective on the way to think about advancing health computing while paying homage to those values.