Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Print publication year: 2005
  • Online publication date: September 2009

19 - Regime effects: ethnicity, social mobility, and public policy in the USA and Britain



What accounts for the social mobility of racial and ethnic groups in liberal capitalist democracies? How do polities, consciously or not, accelerate or retard these groups' advancement? And how might these polities differentially affect the opportunities of various groups to “get ahead”? Drawing on a broader understanding of social mobility than is traditionally employed, this paper compares contemporary racial and ethnic groups in the USA and Great Britain on three crucial aspects of social mobility. In doing so, we emphasize what might be called the regime effect: the consequences for different ethnic groups inhabiting polities that differ in their mix of political institutions and policy instruments. After outlining below our understanding of social mobility, we proceed by tackling in turn three essential, if underappreciated, aspects of social mobility: wealth accumulation; crime; and health.

Scholars have traditionally conceived of social mobility in terms of an individual's position in the labor market, whether measured by occupational strata or income level (Blau and Duncan 1978, Duncan 1984, Erikson and Goldthorpe 1992). “Mobility” refers either to individuals over the course of their life cycle, or across generations. By generating income and by securing status benefits that accompany various employment categories, individuals are conceived of as climbing up, slipping down, or remaining on the same rung of a social ladder common to all in the polity.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Ethnicity, Social Mobility, and Public Policy
  • Online ISBN: 9780511489228
  • Book DOI:
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

D. P. Andrulis , 1998, “Access to Care is the Centerpiece in the Elimination of Socioeconomic Disparities in Health,” Annals of Internal Medicine, 129: 412–16

M. Benin and V. M. Keith , 1995, “The Social Support of Employed African American and Anglo Mothers,” Journal of Family Issues 16, 275–97

T. J. Biblarz and A. E. Raftery , 1993, “The Effects of Family Disruption on Social Mobility,” American Sociological Review 58: 97–109

C. Collins and D. Williams , 1999, “Segregation and Mortality: The Deadly Effects of Racism?” Sociological Forum 14: 495–523

R. W. Hodge , 1981, “The Measurement of Occupational Status,” Social Science Research 10: 396–415

D. P. Hogan , D. J. Eggebeen , and C. C. Clogg , 1993, “The Structure of Intergenerational Exchanges in American Families,” American Journal of Sociology 98: 1428–58

L. F. Katz , J. R. Kling , and J. B. Liebman , 2001, “Moving to Opportunity in Boston: Early Results of a Randomized Mobility Experiment,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 116: 607–54

J. R. Logan and R. H. Alba , 1993, “Locational Returns to Human Capital: Minority Access to Suburban Community Resources,” Demography 30: 243–68

D. S. Massey , A. B. Gross , and K. Shibuya , 1994, “Migration, Segregation, and the Geographic Concentration of Poverty,” American Sociological Review 59: 425–45

C. Peach , 1998, “South Asians and Caribbean Ethnic Minority Housing Choice in Britain,” Urban Studies 35: 1657–80

C. Schoen , K. Davis , C. DesRoches , K. Donelan , R. Blendon , and E. Strumpf , 2000, “Health Insurance Markets and Income Inequality: Findings from an International Health Policy Survey,” Health Policy 51: 67–85

E. N. Wolff , 1998, “Recent Trends in the Size Distribution of Household Wealth,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 12: 131–50