ABSTRACT

Currently, questions around Internet jurisdiction – in a general sense – are gaining an unprecedented level of attention. Yet, progress is both slow and limited. This chapter argues that the most significant obstacle for progress is found in the fact that our current thinking on jurisdiction is largely dominated by, and rooted in, notions of territoriality. The problem is that it is not always easy – or indeed possible – to determine where (in real-space geographical terms) events take place online. Thus, this chapter advances an alternative. More broadly, this chapter aims to bring attention to several themes of central importance for digital contracts in global surroundings. Apart from the already mentioned reliance on territoriality, those themes are: (i) that the Internet cannot be allowed to be a lawless space; (ii) that cross-border online interaction fulfils a valuable function; (iii) that we presently are experiencing a state of ‘hyper-regulation’ and (iv) that the role of contracts has increased with our use of the Internet. This chapter is also aimed at bringing attention to important considerations of the extent to which we uphold party autonomy in the context of choice of forum and choice of law clauses online. In addition, the prevalent ‘targeting’ focus is discussed and analysed in detail.

INTRODUCTION

The world is changing dramatically and rapidly due to advances in information technology, in particular the Internet. But despite these changes, the central role of contracts remains. In fact, it seems the role contracts play in our lives is increasing. And arguably, this trend is particularly clear in the context of crossborder interactions raising questions of which court(s) may claim jurisdiction, and which (country's) substantive law will govern the interaction.

This chapter commences by examining this theme and four other clear themes discernible in digital contracts in global surroundings, namely: