Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-15T20:55:00.864Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter One - Theorizing Everyday Justice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2019

Sandra Brunnegger
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Justice is endlessly negotiated in everyday life. What motivates the contributors of Everyday Justice is to account for the complexity of justice in the everyday. By using ethnographic studies from various locations and putting into play a range of approaches, the contributors of this volume argue for a view that takes everyday practices of justice as a starting point. The introduction then offers an overarching rationale for teasing out the framework of justice and injustice, justice and law, and relational justice as this has the potential to orient a theoretical account of (everyday) justice. The anthropology of justice in this volume sheds light on how people work every day to bring justice’s future promise – if we accept that justice holds such a promise – into the present.

Type
Chapter
Information
Everyday Justice
Law, Ethnography, Injustice
, pp. 1 - 34
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, Philip. 1988. ‘Notes on the Difficulty of Studying the State (1977)’. Journal of Historical Sociology 1: 5889.Google Scholar
Agnew, John. 2011. ‘Space and Place’. In Agnew, John A. and Livingstone, David N. (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Geographical Knowledge. London: Sage, 316331.Google Scholar
Altamirano, Marco. 2013. Review of Jack Reynolds, Chronopathologies: Time and Politics in Deleuze, Derrida, Analytic Philosophy, and Phenomenology, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. http://ndpr.nd.edu/news/chronopathologies-time-and-politics-in-deleuze-derrida-analytic-philosophy-and-phenomenology/.Google Scholar
Appadurai, Arjun. 1990. ‘Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy’. In Featherstone, Mike (ed.), Global Culture, Nationalism, Globalization and Modernity. London: Sage, 295310.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Ed. Holquist, Michael. Trans. Emerson, Caryl and Holquist, Michael. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Balkin, Jack M. 2009. ‘Critical Legal Theory Today’. In Mootz, Francis J. (ed.), On Philosophy in American Law. New York: Cambridge University Press, 6472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bankovsky, Miriam. 2012. Perfecting Justice in Rawls, Habermas and Honneth: A Deconstructive Perspective. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Besky, Sarah. 2014. The Darjeeling Distinction: Labor and Justice on Fair-Trade Tea Plantations in India. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Biehl, João. 2013. ‘Ethnography in the Way of Theory’. Cultural Anthropology 28(4): 573597.Google Scholar
Borneman, John. 1999. ‘Can Public Apologies Contribute to Peace? An Argument for Retribution’. Anthropology of East Europe Review 17(1): 720.Google Scholar
Borneman, John, and Hammoudi, Abdellah (eds.). 2009. Being There: The Fieldwork Encounter and the Making of Truth. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Nice, Richard, trans. Cambridge Studies in Social Anthropology, 16. London: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyarin, Jonathan (ed.). 1994. Remapping Memory: The Politics of TimeSpace. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Bromberg, Ava, Morrow, Gregory, and Pfeiffer, Deirdre. 2007. ‘Why Spatial Justice?’. Critical Planning 14: 14.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. 2012. ‘Categories of Analysis and Categories of Practice: A Note on the Study of Muslims in European Countries of Immigration’. Ethnic and Racial Studies 36: 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers, and Cooper, Frederick. 2000. ‘Beyond “Identity”’. Theory and Society 29: 147.Google Scholar
Brunnegger, Sandra. 2016. ‘The Craft of Justice-Making through the Permanent Peoples’ Tribunal in Colombia’. In Brunnegger, Sandra and Faulk, Karen A. (eds.), A Sense of Justice: Legal Knowledge and Lived Experience in Latin America. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 123147.Google Scholar
Brunnegger, Sandra. Forthcoming. ‘Ethnographies of Justice: Possibilities of Justice and Law’. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review.Google Scholar
Brunnegger, Sandra, and Faulk, Karen A. (eds.). 2016. A Sense of Justice: Legal Knowledge and Lived Experience in Latin America. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Cahn, Edmond. 1949. The Sense of Injustice: An Anthropocentric View of Law. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Candea, Matei. 2012. ‘Derrida en Corse? Hospitality as Scale-Free Abstraction’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 18: 3448.Google Scholar
Cassatella, Andrea. 2015. ‘Jacques Derrida and the Theologico-Political Complex’. PhD thesis, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Clarke, Kamari M. 2009. Fictions of Justice: The International Criminal Court and the Challenge of Legal Pluralism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, Kamari M., and Goodale, Mark (eds.). 2010. Mirrors of Justice: Law and Power in the Post–Cold War Era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Das, Veena, Jackson, Michael, Kleinman, Arthur, and Singh, Bhrigupati (eds.). 2014. The Ground Between: Anthropologists Engage Philosophy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
De Certeau, Michel. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life, trans. Rendall, Steven. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Demian, Melissa. 2016. ‘Court in Between: The Spaces of Relational Justice in Papua New Guinea’. Australian Feminist Law Journal 42(1): 1330.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1990. ‘Force of Law: The Mystical Foundation of Authority’, trans. Mary Quaintance. Cardozo Law Review 11: 9211046.Google Scholar
Epstein, Andrew. 2008. ‘Critiquing “La Vie Quotidienne”: Contemporary Approaches to the Everyday’. Contemporary Literature 49(3): 4.Google Scholar
Ferguson, James. 2007. ‘Power Topographies’. In Nugent, David and Vincent, Joan (eds.), A Companion to the Anthropology of Politics. Oxford: Blackwell, 383399.Google Scholar
Fortun, Kim. 2012. ‘Ethnography in Late Industrialism’. Cultural Anthropology 27: 446464.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy, and Honneth, Axel. 2003. Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Goodale, Mark. 2017. Anthropology and Law: A Critical Introduction. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
Goodale, Mark, and Clarke, Kamari M.. 2010. ‘Introduction: Understanding the Multiplicity of Justice’. In Clarke, Kamari M. and Goodale, Mark, Mirrors of Justice: Law and Power in the Post–Cold War Era. New York: Cambridge University Press, 127.Google Scholar
Green, Sarah, Penny, Harvey, and Knox, Hannah. 2005. ‘Scales of Place and Networks: An Ethnography of the Imperative to Connect through Information and Communications Technologies’. Current Anthropology 46: 805–26.Google Scholar
Greenhouse, Carol. 1996. A Moment’s Notice: Time Politics across Cultures. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, David. 1973. Social Justice and the City. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, David. 2003. ‘The Right to the City’. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 27 (4): 939941.Google Scholar
Harvey, David, et al. 2011. ‘On territorial justice, human flourishing and geographical strategies of liberation: an interview with David Harvey’ [Justice territoriale, épanouissement humain et stratégies géographiques de libération: un entretien avec David Harvey, translation: Henri Desbois]. Justice spatiale|Spatial Justice, no. 4, December, www.jssj.org.Google Scholar
James, Deborah, and Toren, Christina. 2013. ‘Introduction: Culture, Context and Anthropologists’ Accounts’. In James, Deborah, Plaice, Evelyn, and Toren, Christina (eds.), Culture Wars: Context, Models and Anthropologists’ Accounts. Oxford: Berghahn, 118.Google Scholar
Jennings, Theodore W. 2006. Reading Derrida/Thinking Paul: On Justice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Kearns, Thomas R., and Sarat, Austin. 1998. ‘Legal Justice and Injustice: Toward a Situated Perspective’. In Sarat, Austin and Kearns, Thomas R. (eds.), Justice and Injustice in Law and Legal Theory. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 118.Google Scholar
Kim, Young. 2015. Justice as Right Actions: An Original Theory of Justice in Conversation with Major Contemporary Accounts. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, Henri. [1947] 1991. Critique of Everyday Life. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Litowitz, Douglas. 2009. Review of Derrida and Legal Philosophy. Peter Goodrich, Florian Hoffmann, Michel Rosenfeld, and Cornelia Vismann (eds.), Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, http://Ndpr.Nd.Edu/News/23897-Derrida-And-Legal-Philosophy/.Google Scholar
Marcus, George. 1993. ‘Mass Toxic Torts and the End of Everyday Life’. In Sarat, Austin and Kearns, Thomas (eds.), Law in Everyday Life. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 237274.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally. 1990. Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness among Working-Class Americans. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally E. 2017. ‘Foreword’. In Goodale, Mark (ed.), Anthropology and Law: A Critical Introduction. New York: NYU Press, ixxii.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Don. 2003. The Right for the City: Social Justice and the Fight for Public Space. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Mol, Annemarie. 2014. ‘A Reader’s Guide to the “Ontological Turn” – Part 4’. http://somatosphere.net/2014/a-readers-guide-to-the-ontological-turn-part-4.html/.Google Scholar
Moody-Adams, Michele M. 2014. Review of Das, Veena, Jackson, Michael, Kleinman, Arthur, and Singh, Bhrigupati (eds.), The Ground between: Anthropologists Engage Philosophy, Durham: Duke University Press. https://ndpr.nd.edu/news/the-ground-between-anthropologists-engage-philosophy/.Google Scholar
Munn, Nancy. 1990. ‘Constructing Regional Worlds in Experience: Kula Exchange, Witchcraft and Gawan Local Events’. Man, (n.s.) 25: 117.Google Scholar
Nader, Laura. 2010. ‘Epilogue: The Words We Use: Justice, Human Rights, and the Sense of Injustice’. In Clarke, Kamari Maxine and Goodale, Mark(eds.), Mirrors of Justice: Law and Power in the Post–Cold War Era. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nader, Laura, and Sursock, Andrée. 1986. ‘Anthropology and Justice’. In Cohen, R. L. (ed.), Justice: Views from the Social Science. New York: Plenum Press, 205234.Google Scholar
Orford, Anne. 2012. ‘In Praise of Description’. Leiden Journal of International Law 25(3): 609625.Google Scholar
Paasi, Anssi, and Zimmerbauer, Kaj. 2011. ‘Theory and Practice of the Region: A Contextual Analysis of the Transformation of Finnish Regions’. Treballs de la Societat Catalana de Geografia 71–72: 163178.Google Scholar
Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, Andreas. 2004. ‘Between Law and Justice: A Connection of No-Connection in Luhmann and Derrida’. In Himma, Kenneth Einar (ed.), Law, Morality, and Legal Positivism: Proceedings of the 21st World Congress of the International Association for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy (IVR). Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 175183.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1989. ‘The Domain of the Political and Overlapping Consensus’. New York University Law Review 64: 233255.Google Scholar
Robbins, Joel. 2010. ‘Recognition, Reciprocity, and Justice: Melanesian Reflections on the Rights of Relationships’. In Clarke, Kamari M. and Goodale, Mark (eds.), Mirrors of Justice: Law and Power in the Post–Cold War Era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 171190.Google Scholar
Roohi, Sanam. 2015. ‘Space, Place and the Social Sciences’. Presented at Insights Meeting on SPACE, organized by the NIAS Consciousness Studies Programme, Bangalore, 4 July 2015. http://niasconsciousnesscentre.org/Insights/sroohi-space.pdf.Google Scholar
Rosen, Lawrence. 1989. The Anthropology of Justice: Law as Culture in Islamic Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rosen, Lawrence. 2000. The Justice of Islam: Comparative Perspectives on Islamic Law and Society. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Ross, Fiona C. 2003. Bearing Witness: Women and the South African TRC. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Benedicta. 2008. ‘“This Is a Court of Law, Not a Court of Morality”: Kastom and Custom in Vanuatu State Courts’. Journal of South Pacific Law 12(2): 1527.Google Scholar
Salamanca Villamizar, Carlos, and Francisco Astudillo, Pizarro. 2016. ‘Justicia(s) espacial(es) y tensiones socio-ambientales. Desafíos y posibilidades para la etnografía de un problema transdisciplinario’. Etnografías Contemporáneas 2(3): 2454.Google Scholar
Sapignoli, Marie. 2018. Hunting Justice: Development, Law, and Activism in the Kalahari. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Kearns, Thomas R. (eds.). 1998. Justice and Injustice in Law and Legal Theory. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Kearns, Thomas R. (eds.). 2009. Law in Everyday Life. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya. 1999. Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith N. 1990. The Faces of Injustice. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sieder, Rachel. 2017. Demanding Justice and Security: Indigenous Women and Legal Pluralities in Latin America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Soja, Edward W. 2010. Seeking Spatial Justice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther 2009. ‘Self-Subversive Justice: Contingency or Transcendence Formula of Law’. Modern Law Review 72(1): 123.Google Scholar
Valverde, Mariana. 2003. ‘“Which Side Are You On?” Uses of the Everyday in Sociolegal Scholarship’. POLAR 26(1): 8698.Google Scholar
Valverde, Mariana. 2015. Chronotopes of Law: Jurisdiction, Scale and Governance. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weszkalnys, Gisa. 2010. Berlin, Alexanderplatz: Transforming Place in a Unified Germany. Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Wilson, Richard A. 2000. ‘Reconciliation and Revenge in Post‐Apartheid South Africa: Rethinking Legal Pluralism and Human Rights’. Current Anthropology 41(1): 7598.Google Scholar
Wilson, Richard A. 2001. The Politics of Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa: Legitimising the Post-Apartheid State. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×