Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T15:28:21.935Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Simple experiments comparing the means of two populations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

A. J. Underwood
Affiliation:
University of Sydney
Get access

Summary

The logic and procedures used in the mensurative or goodness-of-fit tests described in the previous chapter can be used in much more useful and less contrived circumstances. The procedures of t-tests underpin a variety of different topics and tests (including, for example, analyses of regressions). Here, the usefulness of t-distributions and their underlying theory are discussed in comparisons of two populations where there are hypotheses about their means. These occur in a great variety of biological experiments and are one of the most widespread forms of experimentation used. The simplest cases concern what are known as paired data.

Paired comparisons

The classical case of paired comparisons is known as a ‘before–after’ contrast. This sort of experiment involves knowing something about a population before the application of an experimental treatment and then measuring it again after the treatment to test the hypothesis that the treatment makes some predicted difference. The same elements in the population are measured before and after the experiment.

Other situations involve naturally paired data. For example, the eldest male and eldest female siblings are naturally paired data – they must come from the same family. Another case involves measurements on the right-and left-hand side of an animal's body to test a null hypothesis in which one side of the animal has been experimentally treated in some way. A final situation where paired data can be used to test hypotheses about means is when there are two analytical procedures to be compared, for example a new and a previously standard method for determining the concentration of chlorophyll in leaves.

Type
Chapter
Information
Experiments in Ecology
Their Logical Design and Interpretation Using Analysis of Variance
, pp. 100 - 139
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×