Book contents
- Experiments in Public Management Research
- Experiments in Public Management Research
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface and Acknowledgements
- Part I Context
- Part II Methods
- Part III Substantive Contributions
- Part IV Issues and Implications
- 21 Replication of Experimental Research: Implications for the Study of Public Management
- 22 The Experimental Turn in Public Management: How Methodological Preferences Drive Substantive Choices
- 23 Changing How Government Works: The Transformative Potential of an Experimental Public Management*
- 24 Conclusions – Towards an Experimental Public Management
- Appendix Recommended Reporting Guidelines for Experiments in Public Management, a Checklist1
- Index
- References
21 - Replication of Experimental Research: Implications for the Study of Public Management
from Part IV - Issues and Implications
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 July 2017
Book contents
- Experiments in Public Management Research
- Experiments in Public Management Research
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface and Acknowledgements
- Part I Context
- Part II Methods
- Part III Substantive Contributions
- Part IV Issues and Implications
- 21 Replication of Experimental Research: Implications for the Study of Public Management
- 22 The Experimental Turn in Public Management: How Methodological Preferences Drive Substantive Choices
- 23 Changing How Government Works: The Transformative Potential of an Experimental Public Management*
- 24 Conclusions – Towards an Experimental Public Management
- Appendix Recommended Reporting Guidelines for Experiments in Public Management, a Checklist1
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Experiments in Public Management ResearchChallenges and Contributions, pp. 439 - 460Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Berman, E. M., Moon, M. J., and Choi, H. S., ed. 2010. Public Administration in East Asia: Mainland China, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Bozeman, B. 1993. ‘A theory of government “red tape”’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 3(3): 273–304.Google Scholar
Bozeman, B. 2012. ‘Multidimensional red tape: a theory coda’, International Public Management Journal 15(3): 245–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartwright, N. and Hardie, J. 2012. Evidence-Based Policy: A Practical Guide to Doing It Better. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, T., Dong, Lisheng, P., M., and Walker, R. M. 2012. ‘Imitating the West? Evidence on administrative reform from the upper echelons of Chinese provincial government’, Public Administration Review 72(6): 798–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., and Ryan, R. M. 1999. ‘A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation’, Psychological Bulletin 125(6): 627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Francis, G. 2012. ‘The psychology of replication and the replication of psychology’, Perspectives on Psychological Sciences 7(6): 585–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freese, J. 2007. ‘Replication standards for quantitative social sciences. Why not sociology?’, Sociological Methods & Research 36(2): 153–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, B. S. Reto, J. and Jengen, R. 2001. ‘Motivation crowding theory’, Journal of Economic Surveys 15(5): 589–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ioannidis, J. P. A. 2005. ‘Why most published research findings are false’, PLoS Medicine 2(8): e124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, O. 2011. ‘Performance measures and democracy: Information effects on citizens in field and laboratory experiments.’ Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(3): 399–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jilke, S., Van Ryzin, G. G., and Van de Walle, S., 2015. ‘Responses to decline in marketized public services: an experimental evaluation of choice overload’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory doi: 10.1093/jopart/muv021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jilke, S., Van Ryzin, G. G., and Van de Walle, S. 2016. ‘Responses to decline in marketized public services: An experimental evaluation of choice overload.’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 26(3): 421–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, W. and Feeney, M. K. 2014. ‘Beyond the rules: the effect of outcome favourability on red tape perceptions’, Public Administration 92(1): 178–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewin, K. 1943. ‘Defining the “field at a given time”’, Psychological Review 50(2): 292–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrell, K. and Lucas, J. W. 2012. ‘The replication problem and its implications for policy studies’, Critical Policy Studies 6(2): 182–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, R. B. and Williams, K. C. 2010. Experimental Political Science and the Study of Causality: From Nature to the Lab. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nosek, B. A. and Lakens, D. 2014. ‘Registered reports: a method to increase the credibility of published results’, Social Psychology 45(3): 137–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, B. Z. and Schmidt, W. H. 1994. ‘An updated look at the values and expectations of federal-government executives’, Public Administration Review 54(1): 20–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, R. 1991. ‘Replication in behavioral research’. In Neuliep, J. W. (Ed.), Replication Research in the Social Sciences, 1–30. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Sargent, C. L. 1981. ‘The repeatability of significance and the significance of repeatability’, European Journal of Parapsychology 3(4): 423–43.Google Scholar
Schmidt, S. 2009. ‘Shall we really do it again? The powerful concept of replication is neglected in the social sciences’, Review of General Psychology 13(2): 90–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shangraw, R. F. Jr. and Crow, M. M. 1989. ‘Public administration as a design science’, Public Administration Review 49: 153–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsang, E. W. K. and Kwan, K.-M. 1999. ‘Replication and theory development in organizational science: a critical realist perspective’, Academy of Management Review 24(4): 759–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Wal, Z. and Yang, L. 2015. ‘Confucius meets Weber or “managerialism takes all”? Comparing civil servants’ values in China and the Netherlands’, International Public Management Journal 18(3): 411–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Ryzin, G. G. 2006. ‘Testing the expectancy disconfirmation model of citizen satisfaction with local government’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16: 599–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Witteloostuijn, A. 2015. What Happened to Popperian Falsification? A Manifesto to Create a Healthier Business and Management Scholarship – Towards a Scientific Wikipedia. The Netherlands: Tilburg University.Google Scholar
Vandenabeele, W., Brewer, G. A., and Ritz, A. 2014. ‘Past, present, and future of public service motivation research’, Public Administration 92(4): 779–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4
- Cited by