Amabile, T. M. 1993. ‘Motivational synergy: toward new conceptualizations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace’, Human Resource Management Review 3(3): 185–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A. and Tighe, E. M. 1994. ‘The work preference inventory: assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66(5): 950.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Arieli, S., Grant, A. M. and Sagiv, L. 2014. ‘Convincing yourself to care about others: an intervention for enhancing benevolence values’, Journal of Personality 82(1): 15–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ariely, D., Bracha, A. and Meier, S. 2009. ‘Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially’, The American Economic Review 99: 544–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Belle, N. 2013. ‘Experimental evidence on the relationship between public service motivation and job performance’, Public Administration Review 73(1): 143–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Belle, N. 2015. ‘Performance-related pay and the crowding out of motivation in the public sector: a randomized field experiment’, Public Administration Review 75(2): 230–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Belle, N. and Cantarelli, P. 2015. ‘Monetary incentives, motivation, and job effort in the public sector: an experimental study with Italian government executives’, Review of Public Personnel Administration 35(2): 99–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bénabou, R. and Tirole, J. 2006. ‘Incentives and prosocial behavior’, American Economic Review 96(5): 1652–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyne, G. 2002. ‘Public and private management: what’s the difference?’ Journal of Management Studies 39: 97–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyne, G., Meier, K. J., O’Toole, L. J. and Walker, R. M. 2005. ‘Where next? Research directions on performance in public organizations’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15(4): 633–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brief, A. P. and Aldag, R. J. 1977. ‘The intrinsic-extrinsic dichotomy: toward conceptual clarity’, Academy of Management Review 2(3): 496–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deci, E. L. and Ryan, R. M. 1985. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fryer, R. G. Jr., Levitt, S. D., List, J. and Sadoff, S. 2012. ‘Enhancing the efficacy of teacher incentives through loss aversion: a field experiment’, National Bureau of Economic Research, No. w18237.Google Scholar

Gagné, M. and Deci, E. L. 2005. ‘Self-determination theory and work motivation’, Journal of Organizational Behavior 26(4): 331–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gneezy, U. and Rustichini, A. 2000. ‘Pay enough or don’t pay at all’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 115(3): 791–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grant, A. M. 2007. ‘Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference’, Academy of Management Review 32(2): 393–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grant, A. M. 2008a. ‘Employees without a cause: the motivational effects of prosocial impact in public service’, International Public Management Journal 11(1): 48–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grant, A. M. 2008b. ‘The significance of task significance: job performance effects, relational mechanisms, and boundary conditions’, Journal of Applied Psychology 93(1): 108–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Grant, A. M. 2008c. ‘Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity’, Journal of Applied Psychology 93(1): 48–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Grant, A. M. and Berry, J. W. 2011. ‘The necessity of others is the mother of invention: intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity’, Academy of Management Journal 54: 73–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grant, A. M., Campbell, E. M., Chen, G., Cottone, K., Lapedis, D. and Lee, K. 2007. ‘Impact and the art of motivation maintenance: the effects of contact with beneficiaries on persistence behavior’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 103: 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grant, A. M. and Hofmann, D. A. 2011. ‘Outsourcing inspiration: the performance effects of ideological messages from leaders and beneficiaries’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 116(2): 173–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grant, A. M. and Shin, J. 2012. ‘Work motivation: directing, energizing, and maintaining effort (and research)’, in Ryan, R. M. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Human Motivation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mellström, C. and Johannesson, M. 2008. ‘Crowding out in blood donation: was Titmuss right?’ Journal of the European Economic Association 6(4): 845–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perry, J. L. 2012. ‘How can we improve our science to generate more usable knowledge for public professionals?’ Public Administration Review 72(4): 479–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perry, J. L., Hondeghem, A. and Wise, L. Recascino 2010. ‘Revisiting the motivational bases of public service: twenty years of research and an agenda for the future’, Public Administration Review 79(5): 681–90.Google Scholar

Perry, J. L., Mesch, D. and Paarlberg, L. 2006. ‘Motivating employees in a new governance era: the performance paradigm revisited’, Public Administration Review 66(4): 505–14.Google Scholar

Ritz, A., Brewer, G. A. and Neumann, O. 2016. ‘Public service motivation: a systematic literature review and outlook’, Public Administration Review. Early view. doi: 10.1111/puar.12505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ryan, R. M. and Deci, E. L. 2000. ‘Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being’, American Psychologist 55(1): 68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Vandenabeele, W. 2007. ‘Toward a public administration theory of public service motivation: an institutional approach’, Public Management Review 9(4): 545–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weibel, A., Rost, K. and Osterloh, M. 2010. ‘Pay for performance in the public sector. Benefits and (hidden) costs’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 20(2): 387–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wright, B. E., Christensen, R. K. and Pandey, S. K. 2013. ‘Measuring public service motivation: exploring the equivalence of existing global measures’, International Public Management Journal 16(2): 197–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adamowicz, W., Louviere, J., and Williams, M. 1994. ‘Combining revealed and stated preference methods for valuing environmental amenities’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26(3), 271–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, D. M. and Edwards, B. C. 2014. ‘Unfulfilled promise: laboratory experiments in public management research, Public Management Review, DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2014.943272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Antonakis, J., Bendahan, S., Jacquart, P., and Lalive, R. 2010. ‘On making causal claims: a review and recommendations’, The Leadership Quarterly 21(6), 1086–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Antonakis, J., d’Adda, G., Weber, R., and Zehnder, C. 2014. ‘Just words? Just speeches? On the economic value of charismatic leadership’. Working paper. Department of Organizational Behavior, University of Lausanne.Google Scholar

Arthur, C. A. and Hardy, L. 2014. ‘Transformational leadership: a quasi-experimental study’, Leadership & Organization Development Journal 35(1), 38–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barling, J., Weber, T., and Kelloway, E. K. 1996. ‘Effects of transformational leadership training on attitudinal and financial outcomes: a field experiment’, Journal of Applied Psychology 81(6), 827–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bellé, N. 2014. ‘Leading to make a difference: a field experiment on the performance effects of transformational leadership, perceived social impact, and public service motivation’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 24, 109–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bellé, N. 2015. ‘Performance-related pay and the crowding-out of motivation in the public sector: a randomized field experiment’, Public Administration Review 75(2), 230–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blom-Hansen, J., Morton, R., and Serritzlew, S. 2015. ‘Experiments in public management research’, International Public Management Journal. Posted online 11 March 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bono, J. E. and Judge, T. A. 2003. ‘Self-concordance at work: toward understanding the motivational effects of transformational leaders’, Academy of Management Journal 46, 554–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Choudhury, P. and Khanna, T. 2014. ‘Do leaders matter? Natural experiment and quantitative case study of Indian state owned laboratories’. Harvard Business School Working Paper 14–077. www.hbs.edu/faculty/Publication%20Files/14–077_49ce3a1b-0f07-4bb0-9d8b-70bbaa7590ec.pdf Accessed 24 May 2015.Google Scholar

Chreim, S., Williams, B. E., Janz, L., and Dastmalchian, A. 2010. ‘Change agency in a primary health care context: the case of distributed leadership’, Health Care Management Review 35(2), 187–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collignon, B. and Detrain, C. 2010. ‘Distributed leadership and adaptive decision-making in the ant Tetramorium caespitum’, Proceedings: Biological Sciences 277, 1267–73.Google ScholarPubMed

Day, D. V. 2013. ‘Training and developing leaders: theory and research’, in Rumsey, M. G. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Leadership (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 76–93.Google Scholar

Deluga, R. J. and Souza, J. 1991. ‘The effects on transformational and transactional leadership styles on the influencing behavior of subordinate police officers’, Journal of Occupational Psychology 64, 49–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doh, J. P. 2003. ‘Can leadership be taught? Perspectives from management educators’, Academy of Management Learning and Education 2(1), 54–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dvir, T., Eden, D., Avolio, B. J., and Shamir, B. 2002. ‘Impact of transformational leadership on follower development and performance: a field experiment’, The Academy of Management Journal 45(4), 735–44.Google Scholar

Favero, N. and Bullock, J. B. 2015. ‘How (not) to solve the problem: an evaluation of scholarly responses to common source bias’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25(1), 285–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Green, P. E. and Rao, V. R., 1971. ‘Conjoint measurement for quantifying judgemental data’, Journal of Marketing Research 8, 355–63.Google Scholar

Green, P. E. and Srinivasan, V. 1978. ‘Conjoint analysis in consumer research: issues and outlook’, Journal of Consumer Research 5, 103–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hardy, L., Arthur, C. A. et al. 2010. ‘The relationship between transformational leadership behaviors, psychological, and training outcomes in elite military recruits’, The Leadership Quarterly 21(1), 20–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, A. 2008. ‘Distributed leadership: according to the evidence’, Journal of Educational Administration, 46(2), 172–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hassan, R. A., Fuwad, B. A., and Rauf, A. I. 2010. ‘Pre-training motivation and the effectiveness of transformational leadership training: an experiment’, Academy of Strategic Management Journal 9(2), 123–31.Google Scholar

Holten, A. L., Bøllingtoft, A., and Wilms, I. 2015. ‘Leadership in a changing world: developing managers through a teaching and learning programme’, Management Decision 53(5), 1107–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacobsen, C. B. and Andersen, L. B. 2015. ‘Is leadership in the eye of the beholder? A study of intended and perceived leadership practices and organizational performance’, Public Administration Review 75(6), 829–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacobsen, C. B., Bøllingtoft, A., and Andersen, L. B. 2015. ‘Can leadership training teach leaders to LEAP? Experimenting with leadership training and leadership strategies’. Paper presented at APPAM conference, 12–14 November 2015, Miami, USA.Google Scholar

Kelloway, E. K., Barling, J., and Helleur, J. 2000. ‘Enhancing transformational leadership: the roles of training and feedback’, Leadership & Organization Development Journal 21(3), 145–9.Google Scholar

Kelloway, K. E., Barling, J., Kelley, E., Comtois, J., and Gatien, B. 2003. ‘Remote transformational leadership’, Leadership & Organization Development Journal 24(3), 163–71.Google Scholar

Kirkpatrick, S. A. and Locke, E. A. 1996. ‘Direct and indirect effects of three core charismatic leadership components on performance and attitudes’, Journal of Applied Psychology 81, 36–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kjeldsen, A. M, Jonasson, C., and Oversen, M. S. 2015. ‘Distributed leadership in organizational change processes: a qualitative study in public hospital units’. Paper prepared for the 2015 IRSPM Conference. Panel B102: Contemporary Leadership Issues.Google Scholar

Knippenberg, D. V. and Sitkin, S. B. 2013. ‘A critical assessment of charismatic-transformational leadership research: back to the drawing board?’, The Academy of Management Annals 7(1), 1–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kovjanic, S., Schuh, S. C., and Jonas, K. 2013. ‘Transformational leadership and performance: an experimental investigation of the mediating effects of basic needs satisfaction and work engagement’, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 86, 543–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuhfeld, W. 2010. Marketing research methods in SAS: Experimental design, choice, conjoint and graphical techniques (Cary, NC: SAS Institute).Google Scholar

Lancaster, K. J. 1966. ‘A new approach to consumer theory’, Journal of Political Economy 74, 132–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levy, P. E., Cober, R. T., and Miller, T. 2002. ‘The effect of transformational and transactional leadership perceptions on feedback-seeking intentions’, Journal of Applied Social Psychology 32(8), 1703–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Louviere, J. J. and Woodworth, G. 1983. ‘Design and analysis of simulated consumer choice or allocation experiments: an approach based on aggregate data’, Journal of Marketing Research 20, 350–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luce, D. R. and Turkey, J. W. 1964. ‘Simultaneous conjoint measurement: a new type fundamental measurement’, Journal of Mathematical Psychology 1, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marvel, J. D. 2015. ‘Unconscious bias in citizens’ evaluations of public sector performance’. Online before print in Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGuire, M. and Silvia, C. 2009. ‘Does leadership in networks matter? Examining the effect of leadership behaviors on managers’ perceptions of network effectiveness’, Public Performance and Management Review 33(1), 34–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moynihan, D. P., Pandey, S. K., and Wright, B. E. 2012. ‘Setting the table: how transformational leadership fosters performance information use’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 22(1), 143–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nielsen, P. A. and Jacobsen, C. B. 2014. ‘The role of performance information in explaining employee acceptance of leadership’. Paper presented at the Public Administration Review 75th Anniversary International Conference, ‘Next Steps for Public Administration in Theory and Practice: Looking Backward and Moving Forward’. 16–18 November, 2014, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.Google Scholar

Park, S. M. and Rainey, H. G. 2008. ‘Leadership and public service motivation in U.S. federal agencies’, International Public Management Journal 11(1), 109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parry, K. W. and Sinha, P. N. 2005. ‘Researching the trainability of transformational organizational leadership’, Human Resource Development International 8(2), 165–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pedersen, M. J. and Stritch, J. M. 2015. ‘Effects of internal management on managerial trustworthiness’, Paper presented at the Public Management Research Association (PMRA) Conference, Minneapolis, MN, 11–13 June 2015.Google Scholar

Propper, C. 1990. ‘Contingent valuation of time spent on NHS waiting lists’, The Economic Journal 100(400), 193–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rainey, H. G. 1997. Understanding and Managing Public Organizations (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass).Google Scholar

Rosen, S. 1974. ‘Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition’, Journal of Political Economy 82, 34–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silins, H. and Mulford, W. 2002. ‘Leadership and school results’, in Leithwood, K. and Hallinger, P. (eds.), Second International Handbook of Educational Leadership and Administration (Kluwer: Dordrecht), pp. 561–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Timperley, H. 2005. ‘Distributed leadership: developing theory from practice’, Journal of Curriculum Studies 37(4), 395–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Train, K. 1998. ‘Recreation demand models with taste differences over people’, Land Economics 74(2), 230–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Train, K. 2003. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trottier, T., Van Wart, M., and Wang, X. H. 2008. ‘Examining the nature and significance of leadership in government organizations’, Public Administration Review 68(2), 319–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Wart, M. 2003. ‘Public-sector leadership theory: an assessment’, Public Administration Review 63, 214–28.Google Scholar

Van Wart, M. 2013. ‘Administrative leadership theory: a reassessment after 10 Years’, Public Administration 91(3), 521–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vogel, R. and Masal, D. 2014. ‘Public leadership: a review of the literature and framework for future research’, Public Management Review. Published online 20 March 2014 DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2014.895031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wofford, J. C., Whittington, J. L., and Goodwin, V. L. 2001. ‘Follower motive patterns as situational moderators for transformational leadership effectiveness’, Journal of Managerial Issues 13, 196–211.Google Scholar

Wright, B. E., Moynihan, D. P., and Pandey, S. K. 2012. ‘Pulling the levers: transformational leadership, public service motivation, and mission valence’, Public Administration Review 72, 206–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wright, B. E. and Pandey, S. K. 2010. ‘Transformational leadership in the public sector: does structure matter?’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 20(1), 75–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baldwin, J. N. 1990. ‘Perceptions of public versus private sector personnel and informal red tape: their impact on motivation’, The American Review of Public Administration, 20(1), 7–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Borry, E. 2016. ‘A new measure of red tape: introducing the three-item red tape (TIRT) scale’, International Public Management Journal. DOI: 10.1080/10967494.2016.1143421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bozeman, B. 1993. ‘A theory of government “red tape”’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3(3), 273–304.Google Scholar

Bozeman, B. 2000. Bureaucracy and Red Tape. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Bozeman, B. 2012. ‘Multidimensional red tape: a theory coda’, International Public Management Journal, 15(3), 245–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bozeman, B. and Feeney, M. K. 2011. Rules and Red Tape: A Prism for Public Administration Theory and Research. ME Sharpe.Google Scholar

Bozeman, B. and Scott, P. 1996. ‘Bureaucratic red tape and formalization: untangling conceptual knots’, The American Review of Public Administration, 26(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bretschneider, S. 1990. ‘Management information systems in public and private organizations: an empirical test’, Public Administration Review, 50(5), 536–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brewer, G. A. and Walker, R. M. 2010. ‘Red tape: the bane of public organizations?’ In Walker, R. M., Boyne, G. A., and Brewer, G. A. (eds.), Public Management and Performance: Research Directions. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 110–26.Google Scholar

Buchanan, B. 1975. ‘Red-tape and the service ethic: some unexpected differences between public and private managers’, Administration & Society, 6(4), 423–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coursey, D. H. and Pandey, S. K. 2007. ‘Content domain, measurement, and validity of the red tape concept: a second-order confirmatory factor analysis’, The American Review of Public Administration, 37(3), 342–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Jong, G. and Van Witteloostuijn, A. 2015. ‘Regulatory red tape and private firm performance’, Public Administration, 93(1), 34–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeHart-Davis, L. 2017. Creating effective Rules in Public Sector Organizations. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

DeHart-Davis, L., Chen, J., and Little, T. D. 2013. ‘Written versus unwritten rules: the role of rule formalization in green tape’, International Public Management Journal, 16(3), 331–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeHart-Davis, L. and Pandey, S. K. 2005. ‘Red tape and public employees: does perceived rule dysfunction alienate managers?’ Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(1), 133–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dickson, E. S. 2011. ‘Economics vs. psychology experiments: stylization, incentives, and deception’. In Druckmen, J. N., Green, D. P., Kuklinski, J. H., and Lupia, A. (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 58–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Druckmen, J. N., Green, D. P., Kuklinski, J. H., and Lupia, A. 2011. ‘Experimentation in political science’. In Druckmen, J. N., Green, D. P., Kuklinski, J. H., and Lupia, A. (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feeney, M. K. 2012. ‘Organizational red tape: a measurement experiment’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(3), 427–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feeney, M. K. and Rainey, H. G., 2010. ‘Personnel flexibility and red tape in public and nonprofit organizations: distinctions due to institutional and political accountability’. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(4), 801–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giauque, D., Ritz, A., Varone, F., and Anderfuhren-Biget, S. 2012. ‘Resigned but satisfied: the negative impact of public service motivation and red tape on work satisfaction’, Public Administration, 90(1), 175–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodsell, C. T. 1983. The Case for Bureaucracy. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.Google Scholar

Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Pandey, S. K., and Deat, F. 2015. ‘Defending inflexible rules: an experiment on the effect of counter attitudinal behavior on work-related perceptions of public managers’, Paper presented at the 2015 Public Management Research Association Conference, Minneapolis, MN, June 11–13, 2015.Google Scholar

Hall, R. H. 1996. Organizations: structures, processes, and outcomes, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Heintze, T. and Bretschneider, S. 2000. ‘Information technology and restructuring in public organizations: does adoption of information technology affect organizational structures, communications, and decision making?’ Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(4), 801–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hood, C. 1991. ‘A public management for all seasons’, Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufman, H. 1977. Red Tape: Its Origins, Uses, and Abuses. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar

Kaufmann, W. and Feeney, M. K. 2012. ‘Objective formalization, perceived formalization and perceived red tape: sorting out concepts’, Public Management Review, 14(8), 1195–1214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufmann, W. and Feeney, M. K. 2014. ‘Beyond the rules: the effect of outcome favourability on red tape perceptions’, Public Administration, 92(1), 178–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufmann, W. and Tummers, L. 2014. ‘More than words: experimental evidence on the negative effects of red tape on quality and procedural justice’, Paper presented at the IRSPM Conference, Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar

Kelman, Steven. 2008. ‘The “Kennedy school” of research on innovation in government’, In Borins, S. (ed.), Innovations in Government: Research, Recognition, and Replication. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, pp. 28–52.Google Scholar

Lambert, E. G., Paoline, E. A. III, and Hogan, N. L. 2006. ‘The impact of centralization and formalization on correctional staff job satisfaction and organizational commitment: an exploratory study’, Criminal Justice Studies, 19(1), 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

List, J. A., Sadoff, S., and Wagner, M. 2011. ‘So you want to run an experiment, now what? Some simple rules of thumb for optimal experimental design’, Experimental Economics, 14(4), 439–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luton, L. S. 2007. ‘Deconstructing public administration empiricism’, Administration and Society, 39(4), 527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merton, R. K. 1995. ‘The Thomas theorem and the Matthew effect’, Social Forces, 74(2): 379–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moynihan, D. and Herd, P. 2010. ‘Red tape and democracy: how rules affect citizenship rights’, The American Review of Public Administration, 40(6), 654–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moynihan, D. P. and Pandey, S. K. 2006. ‘Creating desirable organizational characteristics: how organizations create a focus on results and managerial authority’, Public Management Review, 8(1), 119–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moynihan, D. P. and Pandey, S. K. 2007. ‘The role of organizations in fostering public service motivation’, Public Administration Review, 67(1), 40–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Osborne, D. and Gaebler, T. 1992. Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming Government. Reading, MA: Adison Wesley.Google Scholar

Pandey, S. K. 1995. ‘Managerial perceptions of red tape’, Unpublished PhD dissertation, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY.Google Scholar

Pandey, S. 2012. ‘E-government and small business activity’. In Shareef, M. A. et al. (eds.), Transformational Government through Egov Practice: Socio-economic, Cultural, and Technological Issues. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 369–86.Google Scholar

Pande, S. and Bretschneider, S. 1997. ‘The impact of red tape’s administrative delay on public organizations’ interest in new information technology’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7(1), 113–30.Google Scholar

Pandey, S. K., Coursey, D. H., and Moynihan, D. P. 2007. ‘Organizational effectiveness and bureaucratic red tape: a multimethod study’, Public Performance & Management Review, 30(3), 398–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pandey, S. K., Dwivedi, Y. K., Shareef, M. A., and Kumar, V. 2014. ‘Introduction: markets and public administration’. In Dwivedi, Y. K., Shareef, M. A., Pandey, S. K., and Kumar, V. (eds.), Public Administration Reformation: Market Demand from Public Organizations. Routledge/Taylor and Francis, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar

Pandey, S. K. and Kingsley, G. A. 2000. ‘Examining red tape in public and private organizations: alternative explanations from a social psychological model’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(4), 779–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pandey, S. K. and Marlowe, J. 2015. ‘Assessing survey-based measurement of personnel red tape with anchoring vignettes’, Review of Public Personnel Administration, 35(3), 215–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pandey, S. K. and Moynihan, D. P. 2006. ‘Bureaucratic red tape and organizational performance: testing the moderating role of culture and political support’. In Boyne, G. A., Meier, K. J., O’Toole, L. J. Jr., and Walker, R. M. (eds.), Public Services Performance: Perspectives on Measurement and Management. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pandey, S. K., Pandey, S., Breslin, R., and Broadus, E. 2017. Public Service Motivation Research Program: Key Challenges and Future Prospects. In Raadschelders, J. and Stillman, R. (eds.), Foundations of Public Administration. Irvine, CA: Melvin and Leigh, Chapter 19, pp. 314–332.Google Scholar

Pandey, S. K. and Scott, P. G. 2002. ‘Red tape: a review and assessment of concepts and measures’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12(4), 553–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pandey, S. K. and Welch, E. W. 2005. ‘Beyond stereotypes a multistage model of managerial perceptions of red tape’, Administration & Society, 37(5), 542–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pollitt, C. and Bouckaert, G. 2011. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis – New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Quratulain, S. and Khan, A. K. 2013. ‘Red tape, resigned satisfaction, public service motivation, and negative employee attitudes and behaviors: testing a model of moderated mediation’, Review of Public Personnel Administration, 0734371X13511646.Google Scholar

Rainey, H. G., 1979. ‘Perceptions of incentives in business and government: implications for civil service reform’, Public Administration Review, 39(5), pp. 440–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rainey, H. G. and Bozeman, B. 2000. ‘Comparing public and private organizations: empirical research and the power of the a priori’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 447–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rainey, H. G., Pandey, S., and Bozeman, B. 1995. ‘Research note: public and private managers’ perceptions of red tape’, Public Administration Review 55(6): 567–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scott, P. G. and Pandey, S. K. 2000. ‘The influence of red tape on bureaucratic behavior: an experimental simulation’, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 19(4), 615–33.3.0.CO;2-U>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, R. S. 1999. ‘Contested memory: notes on Robert K. Merton’s “the Thomas theorem and the Matthew effect”’, The American Sociologist, 30(2), 62–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stazyk, E. C., Pandey, S. K., and Wright, B. E. 2011. ‘Understanding affective organizational commitment: the importance of institutional context’, The American Review of Public Administration, 41(6), 603–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomas, W. I. and Thomas, D. S. 1928. The Child in America: Behavior Problems and Programs. Knopf.Google Scholar

Thompson, F. J. and Riccucci, N. M. 1998. ‘Reinventing government’, Annual Review of Political Science, 1(1), 231–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Torenvlied, R. and Akkerman, A. 2012. ‘Effects of managers’ work motivation and networking activity on their reported levels of external red tape’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(3): 445–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tummers, L., Weske, W., Bouwman, R., and Grimmelikhuijsen, S. 2016. ‘The impact of red tape on citizen satisfaction: an experimental study’, International Public Management Journal, 19(3), 320–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van den Bekerom, P., Torenvlied, R., and Akkerman, A. 2015. ‘Managing all quarters of the compass? How internally oriented managerial networking moderates the impact of environmental turbulence on organizational performance’, The American Review of Public Administration, 46(6), 639–59.Google Scholar

Walker, R. M. and Brewer, G. A. 2008. ‘An organizational echelon analysis of the determinants of red tape in public organizations’, Public Administration Review, 68(6), 1112–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Welch, E. and Pandey, S. K. 2007. ‘E-government and bureaucracy: toward a better understanding of intranet implementation and its effect on red tape’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(3), 379–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andersen, S. and Moynihan, D. 2016a. ‘How leaders respond to diversity: the moderating role of organizational culture on performance information use’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 26(3): 448–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andersen, S. and Moynihan, D. 2016b. ‘Bureaucratic investments in expertise: evidence from a randomized controlled field trial’, Journal of Politics 78(4): 1032–1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Askim, J. 2007. ‘How do politicians use performance information? An analysis of the Norwegian local government experience’, International Review of Administrative Sciences 73(3): 453–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Askim, J. 2009. ‘The demand side of performance measurement: explaining councillors’ utilization of performance information in policymaking’, International Public Management Journal 12(1): 24–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bourdeaux, C. 2008. ‘Integrating performance information into legislative budget processes’, Public Performance and Management Review 31(4): 547–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bourdeaux, C. and Chikoto, G. 2008. ‘Legislative influences on performance management reform’, Public Administration Review 68(2): 253–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyne, G., James, O., John, P., and Petrovsky, N. 2009. ‘Democracy and government performance: holding incumbents accountable in English local governments’, Journal of Politics 71(4): 1273–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chun, Y. and Rainey, H. 2005. ‘Goal ambiguity and organizational performance in U.S. federal agencies’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15(4): 529–57.Google Scholar

Cyert, R. and March, J. 1963. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Hoboken, NJ: Willey-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Gailmard, S. and Patty, J. 2012. Learning while Governing: Information, Accountability, and Executive Branch Institutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

George, B., Deschmidt, S., Nielsen, P., and Bækgaard, M. 2016. ‘Rational planning and politicians’ attitudes to spending and reform: replication and extension of a survey experiment’, forthcoming in Public Management Review.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilmour, J. and Lewis, D. 2006. ‘Assessing performance budgeting at OMB: the influence of politics, performance, and program size’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16(2): 169–86.Google Scholar

Greve, H. 2003. Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback: A Behavioral Perspective on Innovation and Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heinrich, C. 2012. ‘How credible is the evidence, and does it matter? An analysis of the program assessment rating tool’, Public Administration Review 72(1): 123–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

James, O. 2009. ‘Evaluating the expectations, disconfirmation and expectations anchoring approaches to citizen satisfaction with public services’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19(1): 107–23.Google Scholar

James, O. 2011. ‘Performance measures and democracy: information effects on citizens in field and laboratory experiments’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21(3): 399–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

James, O. and Moseley, A. 2014. ‘Does performance information about public services affect citizens’ perceptions, satisfaction and voice behaviour? Field experiments with absolute and relative performance information’, Public Administration 92(2): 493–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, C. and Talbot, C. 2007. ‘The UK Parliament and performance: challenging or challenged?’, International Review of Administrative Sciences 73(1): 113–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jung, C. 2012. ‘Developing and validating new concepts and measures of program goal ambiguity in the U.S. federal government’, Administration and Society 44: 675–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kogan, V, Laverty, S. and Peskowitz, Z. 2015. ‘Performance federalism and local democracy: theory and evidence from school tax referenda’, American Journal of Political Science 60(2): 418–35.Google Scholar

Kroll, A. 2013. ‘The other type of performance information: nonroutine feedback, its relevance and use’, Public Administration Review 73(2): 265–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kroll, A. 2014. ‘Why performance information use varies among public managers: testing manager-related explanations’, International Public Management Journal 17(2): 174–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kroll, A. 2015a. ‘Drivers of performance information use: systematic literature review and directions for future research’, Public Performance and Management Review 38(3): 459–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kroll, A. 2015b. ‘Explaining the use of performance information by public managers: a planned-behavior approach’, American Review of Public Administration 45(2): 201–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lavertu, S., Lewis, D., and Moynihan, D. 2013. ‘Administrative reform, ideology, and bureaucratic effort: performance management in the Bush era’, Public Administration Review 73(6): 845–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meier, K. and O’Toole, L. 2013. ‘Subjective organizational performance and measurement error: common source bias and spurious relationships’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 23(2): 429–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moynihan, D. 2008. The Dynamics of Performance Management: Constructing Information and Reform. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Moynihan, D. 2013. ‘Advancing the empirical study of performance management: what we learned from the program assessment rating tool’, American Review of Public Administration 43(5): 499–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moynihan, D. 2015. ‘Uncovering the circumstances of performance information use’, Public Performance and Management Review 39(1): 33–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moynihan, D., Fernandez, S., Kim, S., LeRoux, K., Piotrowski, S., Wright, B. and Yang, K. 2011. ‘Performance regimes amidst governance complexity’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21 (suppl 1): i141–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moynihan, D. and Kroll, A. 2015. ‘Performance management routines that work? An early assessment of the GPRA Modernization Act’, Public Administration Review 76(2): 314–23.Google Scholar

Moynihan, D. and Pandey, S. 2010. ‘The big question for performance management: why do managers use performance information?’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 20(4): 849–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moynihan, D. and Soss, J. 2014. ‘Policy feedback and the politics of administration’, Public Administration Review 74(3): 320–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nielsen, P. 2014. ‘Learning from performance feedback: performance information, aspiration levels, and managerial priorities’, Public Administration 92(1): 142–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nielsen, P. and Bækgaard, M. 2015. ‘Performance information, blame avoidance, and politicians’ attitudes to spending and reform: evidence from an experiment’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25(2): 545–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nielsen, P. and Moynihan, D. 2015. ‘How do politicians attribute bureaucratic responsibility for performance? Negativity bias and interest group advocacy.’ Forthcoming in Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Radin, B. 2012. Federal Management Reforms in a World of Contradictions. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rutherford, A. and Meier, K. 2015. ‘Managerial goals in a performance-driven system: theory and empirical tests in higher education’, Public Administration 93(1): 17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Salge, T. 2011. ‘A behavioral model of innovative search: evidence from public hospital services’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21(1): 181–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

ter Bogt, H. 2004. ‘Politicians in search of performance information? Survey research on Dutch aldermen’s use of performance information’, Financial Accountability and Management 20(3): 221–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taber, M. and Lodge, C. 2013. The Rationalizing Voter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tilley, J. and Hobolt, S. 2011. ‘Is government to blame? An experimental test of how partisanship shapes perceptions of performance and responsibility’, The Journal of Politics 73(2): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Dooren, W. 2004. ‘Supply and demand of policy indicators: a cross-sectoral comparison’, Public Management Review 6(4): 511–30.Google Scholar

Van Dooren, W. 2008. ‘Nothing new under the sun? Change and continuity in the twentieth-century performance movements’, in Van Dooren, W. and Van de Walle, S. (eds.), Performance Information in the Public Sector – How is it used?, Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 11–23.Google Scholar

Van Ryzin, G. 2006. ‘Testing the expectancy disconfirmation model of citizen satisfaction with local government’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16(4): 599–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilson, J. Q. 1989. Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It. Jackson: Basic Books Classics.Google Scholar

Yang, K. and Hsieh, J. Y. 2007. ‘Managerial effectiveness of government performance measurement: testing a middle-range model’, Public Administration Review 67(5): 861–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ammons, D. N. and Roenigk, D. J. 2015. ‘Benchmarking and interorganizational learning in local government’. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25(1), 309–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Askim, J. 2007. ‘How do politicians use performance information? An analysis of the Norwegian local government experience’, International Review of Administrative Sciences 73(3): 453–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Askim, J., Johnsen, A., and Christophersen, K. A. 2008. ‘Factors behind organizational learning from benchmarking: experiences from Norwegian municipal benchmarking networks’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18(2): 297–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bækgaard, M. and Serritzlew, S. 2016. ‘Interpreting performance information: motivated reasoning or unbiased comprehension’, Public Administration Review 76(1): 73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bevan, G. and Hood, C. 2006. ‘What’s measured is what matters: targets and gaming in the English healthcare system’, Public Administration 84(3): 517–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyne, G. A., James, O., John, P., and Petrovsky, N. 2009. ‘Democracy and government performance: holding incumbents accountable in English local governments’, Journal of Politics 71(4): 1273–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chanley, V. A., Rudolph, T. J., and Rahn, W. M. 2000. ‘The origins and consequences of public trust in government: a time series analysis’, Public Opinion Quarterly 64(3): 239–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Charbonneau, É. and Van Ryzin, G. G. 2015. ‘Benchmarks and citizen judgments of local government performance: findings from a survey experiment’, Public Management Review 17(2): 288–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dowding, K. M. and John, P. 2012. Exits, Voices and Social Investments: Citizens’ Reaction to Public Services. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Espeland, W. N. and Sauder, M. 2007. ‘Rankings and reactivity: how public measures recreate social worlds’, American Journal of Sociology 133(1): 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerber, A. and Green, D. 1999. ‘Misperceptions about perceptual bias’, Annual Review of Political Science 2(1): 189–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Jilke, S., Olsen, A. L., and Tummers, L. 2017. ‘Behavioral public administration: combining insights from public administration and psychology’, Public Administration Review 77(1): 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G. and Meijer, A. J. 2014. ‘The effects of transparency on the perceived trustworthiness of a government organization: evidence from an online experiment’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 24(1): 137–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hainmueller, J., Hopkins, D., and Yamamoto, T. 2014. ‘Causal inference in conjoint analysis: understanding multidimensional choices via stated preference experiments’, Political Analysis 22(1): 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hansen, K. M., Olsen, A. L., and Bech, M. 2015. ‘Cross-national yardstick comparisons: a choice experiment on a forgotten voter heuristic’, Political Behavior 37(4): 767–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hatry, H. P. 1999. Performance Measurement: Getting Results. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar

Herbst, S. 1993. Numbered Voices: How Opinion Polling Has Shaped American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Hibbing, J. R., Smith, K. B., and Alford, J. R. 2014. ‘Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology’, Behavioral and Brain Science 37: 297–350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hood, C. 2006. ‘Transparency in historical perspective’. In Hood, C. and Heald, D. (Eds.), Transparency: The Key to Better Governance? 3–23. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hood, C. 2010. The Blame Game: Spin, Bureaucracy and Self-Preservation in Government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hvidmand, U. and Andersen, S. 2015. ‘Perceptions of public and private performance: evidence from a survey experiment’, Public Administration Review.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

James, O. 2011a. ‘Performance measures and democracy: information effects on citizens in field and laboratory experiments’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21: 399–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

James, O. 2011b. ‘Managing citizens’ expectations of public service performance: evidence from observation and experimentation in local government’, Public Administration 89(4): 1419–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

James, O., Jilke, S., Petersen, C., and Van de Walle, S. 2016. ‘Citizens’ blame of politicians for public service failure: experimental evidence about blame reduction through delegation and contracting’, Public Administration Review 76(1): 83–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

James, O. and John, P. 2007. ‘Public management at the ballot box: performance information and electoral support for incumbent English local governments’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 17(4): 567–80.Google Scholar

James, O. and Moseley, A. 2014. ‘Does performance information about public services affect citizens’ perceptions, satisfaction, and voice behaviour? Field experiments with absolute and relative performance information’, Public Administration 92(2): 493–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

James, O. and Van Ryzin, G. G. 2017a. ‘Incredibly good performance: an experimental study of source and level effects on the credibility of government’, American Review of Public Administration 47(1): 23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

James, O. and Van Ryzin, G. G. 2017b. ‘Motivated reasoning about public performance: an experimental study of how citizens judge the Affordable Care Act’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 27(1): 197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kroll, A. 2013. ‘The other type of performance information: non-routine feedback, its relevance and use’, Public Administration Review 73(2): 265–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lacetera, N., Pope, D. G., and Sydnor, J. R. 2012. ‘Heuristic thinking and limited attention in the car market’, American Economic Review 102(5): 2206–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lau, R. R. 1982. ‘Negativity in political perception’, Political Behavior 4(4): 353–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lau, R. R. 1985. ‘Two explanations for negativity effects in political behavior’, American Journal of Political Science 29(1): 119–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leeper, T. J. and Slothuus, R. 2014. ‘Political parties, motivated reasoning, and public opinion formation’, Political Psychology 35(S1): 129–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levin, I. P. and Gaeth, G. J. 1988. ‘How consumers are affected by the framing of attribute information before and after consuming the product’, Journal of Consumer Research 16: 374–78.Google Scholar

Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., and Gaeth, G. J. 1998. ‘All frames are not created equal: a typology and critical analysis of framing effects’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 76(2): 149–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lodge, M and Taber, C. S. 2013. The Rationalizing Voter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Malhotra, N. and Margalit, Y. 2010. ‘Short-term communication effects or longstanding dispositions? The public’s response to the financial crisis of 2008’. The Journal of Politics 72(03): 852–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marvel, J. D. 2015. ‘Public opinion and public sector performance: Are individuals’ beliefs about performance evidence-based or the product of anti-public sector bias?’ International Public Management Journal 18(2): 209–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moynihan, D. P. 2008. The Dynamics of Performance Management: Constructing Information and Reform. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Moynihan, D. P. and Pandey, S. K. 2010. ‘The big question for performance management: why do managers use performance information?’ Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 20(4): 849–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mussweiler, T. 2003. ‘Comparison processes in social judgement: mechanisms and consequences’, Psychological Review, (110)3: 472–89.Google Scholar

Olsen, A. L 2013a. ‘Leftmost-digit-bias in an enumerated public sector? An experiment on citizens’ judgment of performance information’, Judgment and Decision Making 8(3): 365–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olsen, A. L. 2013b. ‘The politics of digits: evidence of odd taxation’, Public Choice 154 1–2): 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olsen, A. L. 2015a. ‘Citizen (dis)satisfaction: an equivalence framing study’, Public Administration Review 75(3): 469–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olsen, A. L. 2015b. ‘“Simon said”, we didn’t jump’, Public Administration Review 75(2): 469–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olsen, A. L. 2015c. ‘The numerical psychology of performance information – implications for citizens, managers, and policy makers’, Public Performance & Management Review 39(1): 100–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olsen, A. L. 2015d. ‘Negative performance information causes asymmetrical evaluations and elicits strong responsibility attributions’, 111th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, September 2015.Google Scholar

Olsen, A. L. 2017a. ‘Human interest or hard numbers? Experiments on citizens’ selection, exposure, and recall of performance information’, Public Administration Review http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/puar.12638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olsen, A. L. 2017b. ‘Compared to what? experimental evidence on social and historical reference points in performance evaluation’, Forthcoming in Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perrin, B. 1998. ‘Effective use and misuse of performance measurement’, American Journal of Evaluation 19(3): 367–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Petersen, M. B., Skov, M., Serritzlew, S., and Ramsøy, T. 2012. ‘Motivated reasoning and political parties: evidence for increased processing in the face of party cues’, Political Behavior 35(4): 831–54.Google Scholar

Pope, D. and Simonsohn, U. 2011. ‘Round numbers as goals evidence from baseball, SAT takers, and the lab’, Psychological Science 22(1): 71–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rabin, M. 1998. ‘Psychology and economics’, Journal of Economic Literature 36(1): 11–46.Google Scholar

Rozin, P. and Royzman, E. B. 2001. ‘Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion’, Personality and Social Psychology Review 5(4): 296–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simon, H. A. 1939. ‘The administrator in search of statistics’, Public Management, 21: 106–9.Google Scholar

Simon, H. A. 1955. ‘A behavioral model of rational choice’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 69(1): 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Soroka, S. N. 2006. ‘Good news and bad news: asymmetric responses to economic information’, Journal of Politics 68(2): 372–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stone, D. A. 1997. Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. New York: WW Norton.Google Scholar

Tummers, L., Olsen, A. L., Jilke, S., and Grimmelikhuijsen, S. 2016. ‘Introduction to the virtual issue on behavioral public administration’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Virtual Issue (3): 1–3.Google Scholar

Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. 1991. ‘Loss aversion in riskless choice: a reference-dependent model’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1039–61.Google Scholar

Van Dooren, W., Bouckaert, G. and Halligan, J. 2015. Performance Management in the Public Sector. London, Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Ryzin, G. G. 2011. ‘Outcomes, process, and trust of civil servants’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(4): 745–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Ryzin, G. G. and Lavena, C. F. 2013. ‘The credibility of government performance reporting’, Public Performance & Management Review, 37(1): 87–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weaver, R. K. 1986. ‘The politics of blame avoidance’, Journal of Public Policy 6(4): 371–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bannister, F. and Connolly, R. 2011. ‘The trouble with transparency: a critical review of openness in e-government’, Policy and Internet 3(1): 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bauhr, M. and Grimes, M 2014. ‘Indignation or resignation: the implications of transparency for societal accountability’, Governance 27(2): 291–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, A. L. 2003. How Policies Make Citizens: Senior Political Activism and the American Welfare State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coglianese, C. 2009. ‘The transparency president? The Obama administration and open government’, Governance 22(4): 529–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cucciniello, M. and Nasi, G. 2014. ‘Transparency for trust in government: how effective is formal transparency?’ International Journal of Public Administration 37(13): 911–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cuillier, D. 2010. ‘Honey v. vinegar: testing compliance-gaining theories in the context of freedom of information laws’, Communication Law and Policy 15(3): 203–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Fine Licht, J. 2011. ‘Do we really want to know? The potentially negative effect of transparency in decision making on perceived legitimacy’, Scandinavian Political Studies 34: 183–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Fine Licht, J. 2014. ‘Policy area as a potential moderator of transparency effects: an experiment’, Public Administration Review 74(3): 361–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Fine Licht, J., Naurin, D., Esaiasson, P., and Gilljam, M. 2014. ‘When does transparency generate legitimacy? Experimenting on a context‐bound relationship’, Governance, 27(1): 111–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erkkilä, T. 2012. Government Transparency: Impact and Unintended Consequences. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Etzioni, A. 2010. ‘Is transparency the best disinfectant?’ The Journal of Political Philosophy 18(4): 389–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Florini, A. 2007. ‘Introduction: the battle over transparency’, in Florini, A. (ed.), The Right to Know: Transparency for an Open World, pp. 1–16. New York: Colombia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G. 2011. ‘Being transparent or spinning the message? An experiment into the effects of varying message content on trust in government’, Information Polity 16(1): 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G. 2012. ‘Linking transparency, knowledge and citizen trust in government: an experiment’, International Review of Administrative Sciences 78(1): 50–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grimmelikhuijsen, S. and Kasymova, J. 2015. ‘Not so universal after all: exploring the meaning and use of government transparency in consensual and majoritarian democracies’, Public Integrity 17(4): 389–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grimmelikhuijsen, S. and Klijn, A. 2015. ‘The effects of judicial transparency on public trust: evidence from a field experiment’, Public Administration 93(4): 995–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G. and Meijer, A. J. 2014. ‘The effects of transparency on the perceived trustworthiness of a government organization: evidence from an online experiment’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 24(1): 137–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G., Porumbescu, G., Hong, B., and Im, T. 2013. ‘The effect of transparency on trust in government: a cross‐national comparative experiment’, Public Administration Review 73(4): 575–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G. and Welch, E. W. 2012. ‘Developing and testing a theoretical framework for computer-mediated transparency of local governments’, Public Administration Review 78(1): 562–71.Google Scholar

Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture’s Consequences. International Differences in Work-Related Values. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Hood, C. 1991. ‘A public management for all seasons?’ Public Administration 69(1): 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hood, C. 2006. ‘Transparency in historical perspective’, in Hood, C. and Heald, D. (eds.), pp. 3–23.Google Scholar

Hood, C, and Heald, D. (eds.) 2006. Transparency: The Key to Better Governance? Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keane, J. 2009. The Life and Death of Democracy. Norton: New York.Google Scholar

Lindstedt, C. and Naurin, D. 2010. ‘Transparency is not enough: making transparency effective in reducing corruption’, International Political Science Review 31(3): 301–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meijer, A. J. 2009. ‘Understanding computer-mediated transparency’, International Review of Administrative Sciences 75(2): 255–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meijer, A. J. 2013. ‘Understanding the complex dynamics of transparency’, Public Administration Review 73(3): 429–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meijer, A. ’t Hart, P., and Worthy, B. 2015. ‘Assessing government transparency: an interpretive framework’, Administration and Society. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399715598341CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O’Neill, O. 2002. A Question of Trust: The BBC Reith Lectures 2002. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Peisakhin, L. 2012. ‘Transparency and corruption: evidence from India’, Journal of Law and Economics 55(1): 129–49.Google Scholar

Peisakhin, L. and Pinto, P. 2010. ‘Is transparency an effective anti-corruption strategy? Evidence from a field experiment in India’, Regulation and Governance 4(3): 261–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pina, V., Torres, L., and Royo, S. 2007. ‘Are ICTs improving transparency and accountability in the EU Regional and local governments? An empirical study’, Public Administration 85(2): 449–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Piotrowski, S. J. 2008. Governmental Transparency in the Path of Administrative Reform. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Porumbescu, G. 2015a. ‘Comparing the effects of e-government and social media use on trust in government: evidence from Seoul, South Korea’, Public Management Review. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2015.1100751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Porumbescu, G. 2015b. ‘Linking transparency to trust in government and voice’, American Review of Public Administration. DOI: 10.1177/0275074015607301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Relly, J. E. and Sabharwal, M. 2009. ‘Perceptions of transparency of government policymaking: a cross-national study’, Government Information Quarterly 26(1): 148–57.Google Scholar

Roberts, A. 2006. Blacked Out: Government Secrecy in the Information Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tetlock, P. E., Kristel, O. V., Elson, S., Green, M. C., and Lerner, J. S. 2000. ‘The psychology of the unthinkable: taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78(5): 853–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tolbert, C. J. and Mossberger, K. 2006. ‘The effects of e-government on trust and confidence in government’, Public Administration Review 66(3): 354–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Welch, E. W., Hinnant, C. C., and Moon, M. J. 2005. ‘Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15(3): 371–91.Google Scholar

Welch, E. W. and Wong, W. 2001. ‘Global information technology pressure and government accountability: the mediating effect of domestic context on website openness’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 11(4): 509–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wirtz, B., Piehler, R., Thomas, M., and Daiser, P. 2015. ‘Resistance of public personnel to open government: a cognitive theory view of implementation barriers towards open government data’, Public Management Review. DOI:10.1080/14719037.2015.1103889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Worthy, B. 2010. ‘More open but not more trusted? The effect of the freedom of information act 2000 on the United Kingdom central government’, Governance 23(4): 561–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zyl, A. 2014. ‘How civil society organizations close the gap between transparency and accountability’, Governance 27(2): 347–56.Google Scholar

Aalbert, T. and Todal Jenssen, A. 2007. ‘Gender stereotyping of political candidates: an experimental study of political communication’, Nordicom Review 28(1): 17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andrews, R., Ashworth, R., and Meier, K. J. 2014. ‘Representative bureaucracy and fire service performance’, International Public Management Journal 17: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Atkins, D. N. and Wilkins, V. M. 2013. ‘Going beyond reading, writing, and arithmetic: the effects of teacher representation on teen pregnancy rates’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 23: 771–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bertrand, M. and Mullainathan, S. 2004. ‘Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination’, American Economic Review 94(4): 991–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bradbury, M., and Kellough, J. E. 2011. ‘Representative bureaucracy: assessing the evidence on active representation’, American Review of Public Administration 41:157–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fix, M. and Struyk, R. J. 1993. Clear and Convincing Evidence: Measurement of Discrimination in America. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar

Gade, D. M. and Wilkins, V. M. 2013. ‘Where did you serve? Veteran identity, representative bureaucracy, and vocational rehabilitation’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 23: 267–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Houston, D. J. 2004. ‘“Walking the Walk” of public service motivation: public employees and charitable gifts of time, blood, and money’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16(1): 67–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keiser, L. R., Wilkins, V. M., Meier, K. J., and Holland, C. 2002. ‘Lipstick and logarithms: gender, institutional context, and representative bureaucracy’, American Political Science Review 96: 553–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kellough, J. E. 1990. ‘Integration in the public workplace: determinants of minority and female employment in federal agencies’, Public Administration Review 50: 557–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kellough, J. E. and Euel, E. 1992. ‘Demographic and organizational influences on racial/ethnic and gender integration in federal agencies’, Social Science Quarterly 73: 1–11.Google Scholar

Kingsley, J. D. 1944. Representative Bureaucracy: An Interpretation of the British Civil Service. Yellow Springs, OH: The Antioch Press.Google Scholar

Matland, R. E. 1994. ‘Putting Scandinavian equality to the test: an experimental evaluation of gender stereotyping of political candidates in a sample of Norwegian voters’, British Journal of Political Science 24(2): 273–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meier, K. J. 1975. ‘Representative bureaucracy: an empirical analysis’, American Political Science Review 69(2): 526–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meier, K. J. 1993a. ‘Latinos and representative bureaucracy: testing the Thompson and Henderson hypotheses’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 3: 393–414.Google Scholar

Meier, K. J. 1993b. ‘Representative bureaucracy: a theoretical and empirical exposition’, Research in Public Administration 2: 1–35.Google Scholar

Meier, K. J. and Nicholson-Crotty, J. 2006. ‘Gender, representative bureaucracy and law enforcement: the case of sexual assault’, Public Administration Review 66: 850–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meier, K. J. and Nigro, L. G. 1976. ‘Representative bureaucracy and policy preferences’, Public Administration Review 36: 458–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meier, K. J. and Stewart, J. 1992. ‘The impact of representative bureaucracies: educational systems and public policies’, American Review of Public Administration 22: 157–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morton, R. B. and Williams, K. C. 2008. ‘Experimentation in political science’. In Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., Brady, Henry E., and Collier, David (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 339–56.Google Scholar

Mosher, F. C. 1968. Democracy and the Public Service. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Riccucci, N. M. and Meyers, M. 2004. ‘Linking passive and active representation: the case of front-line workers in welfare agencies’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14: 585–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Riccucci, N. M. and Saidel, J. R. 1997. ‘The representativeness of state-level bureaucratic leaders’, Public Administration Review 57: 423–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Riccucci, N. M., Van Ryzin, G. G., and Li, H. 2016. ‘Representative bureaucracy and the willingness to coproduce: an experimental study’, Public Administration Review 76(1): 121–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Riccucci, N. M., Van Ryzin, G. G., and Lavena, C. F. 2014. ‘Representative bureaucracy in policing: does it increase perceived legitimacy?’ Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 24: 537–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Selden, S. C. 1997. The Promise of Representative Bureaucracy: Diversity and Responsiveness in a Government Agency. Armonk, NY: Sharpe.Google Scholar

Sowa, J. E. and Selden, S. C. 2003. ‘Administrative discretion and active representation: an expansion of the theory of representative bureaucracy’, Public Administration Review 63: 700–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Theobald, N. A. and Haider-Markel, D. P. 2009. ‘Race, bureaucracy, and symbolic representation: interactions between citizens and police’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19: 409–26.Google Scholar

Van Ryzin, G. G. 2008. ‘Validity of an on-line panel approach to citizen surveys’, Public Performance and Management Review 32(2): 236–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Ryzin, G. G., Riccucci, N. M., and Li, H. 2015. ‘Representative bureaucracy and public engagement in emergency preparedness: a replication experiment’, Paper presented at the 2015 Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management (APPAM) Research Conference, Miami, FL.Google Scholar

Wantchekon, L. 2003. ‘Clientelism and voting behavior: evidence from a field experiment in Benin’, World Politics 55(3): 399–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilkins, V. M. 2007. ‘Exploring the causal story: gender, active representation, and bureaucratic priorities’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 17: 77–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilkins, V. M. and Keiser, L. R. 2006. ‘Linking passive and active representation by gender: the case of child support enforcement’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16: 87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alford, J. 2002. ‘Why do public-sector clients coproduce? Toward a contingency theory’, Administration & Society 34(1): 32–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alford, J. 2009. Engaging Public Sector Clients: From Service-Delivery to Co-production. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andersen, S. C., Nielsen, H. S., and Thomsen, M. K.. 2015. ‘Brugernes reaktion når det offentlige øger serviceniveauet. Resultater fra et lodtrækningsforsøg på skoleområdet’, Politica 47(2): 125–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blom-Hansen, J., Morton, R., and Serritzlew, S.. 2015. ‘Experiments in public management research’, International Public Management Journal 18(2): 151–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bovaird, T. 2007. ‘Beyond engagement and participation: user and community coproduction of public services’, Public Administration Review 67(5): 846–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bovaird, T., Van Ryzin, G. G., Loeffler, E. and Parrado, S.. 2015. ‘Activating citizens to participate in collective co-production of public services’, Journal of Social Policy 44(1): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brudney, J. L. 1983. ‘The evaluation of coproduction programs’, Policy Studies Journal 12(2): 376–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, A. L. 2012. ‘Policy makes mass politics’, Annual Review of Political Science 15: 333–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cartwright, N. and Hardie, J.. 2012. Evidence-Based Policy: A Practical Guide to Doing It Better. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Das, J., Dercon, S., Habyarimana, J., Krishnan, P., Muralidharan, K., and Sundararaman, V.. 2013. ‘School inputs, household substitution, and test scores’, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 5(2): 29–57.Google Scholar

Hjortskov, M., Andersen, S. C., and Jakobsen, M.. 2015. ‘Encouraging political voices of underrepresented citizens through coproduction: evidence from a randomized field trial’. Paper presented at the 2015 PMRA Conference, 11–13 June, Minneapolis.Google Scholar

Jakobsen, M. 2013. ‘Can government initiatives increase citizen coproduction? Results of a randomized field experiment’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 23(1): 27–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jakobsen, M. and Andersen, S. C.. 2013. ‘Coproduction and equity in public service delivery’, Public Administration Review 73(5): 704–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jakobsen, M. and Serritzlew, S.. 2016. ‘Effect on knowledge of nudging citizens with information’, International Journal of Public Administration 39(6): 449–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jakobsen, M. and Thomsen, M. K.. 2015. ‘Samproduktion, offentlige tiltag og servicebrugernes motivation til at deltage’, Politica 47(2): 164–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levine, C. H. 1984. ‘Citizenship and service delivery: the promise of coproduction’, Public Administration Review 44(SI): 178–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ostrom, E. 1996. ‘Crossing the great divide: coproduction, synergy, and development’, World Development 24(6): 1073–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parks, R. B., Baker, P. C., Kiser, L. L., Oakerson, R. J., Ostrom, E., Ostrom, V., Percy, S. L., Vandivort, M. B., Whitaker, G. P., and Wilson, R. K.. 1981. ‘Consumers as co-producers of public-services – some economic and institutional considerations’, Policy Studies Journal 9(7): 1001–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pestoff, V. 2012. ‘Co-production and third sector social services in Europe: some concepts and evidence’. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23(4): 1102–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Percy, S. L. 1984. ‘Citizen participation in the coproduction of urban services’, Urban Affairs Review 19(4): 431–46.Google Scholar

Pop-Eleches, C. and Urquiola, M.. 2013. ‘Going to a better school: effects and behavioral responses’, American Economic Review 103(4): 1289–1324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Porter, D. O. 2012. ‘Co-production and network structures in public education’, in Pestoff, V., Brandsen, T., and Verschuere, B. (eds.), New Public Governance, the Third Sector and Co-production, pp. 145–68. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Rosentraub, M. S. and Sharp, E. B.. 1981. ‘Consumers as producers of social services: coproduction and the level of social services’, Southern Review of Public Administration 4(4): 502–39.Google Scholar

Thomas, J. C. 2012. Citizen, Customer, Partner: Engaging the Public in Public Management. Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.Google Scholar

Thomsen, M. K. and Jakobsen, M.. 2015. ‘Influencing citizen coproduction by sending encouragement and advice: a field experiment’, International Public Management Journal 18(2): 286–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vamstad, J. 2012. ‘Co-production and service quality: a new perspective for the Swedish welfare state’, in Pestoff, V., Brandsen, T., and Verschuere, B. (eds.), New Public Governance, the Third Sector and Co-production, pp. 297–316. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Van Eijk, C. J. A. and Steen, T. P. S.. 2014. ‘Why people co-produce: analysing citizens’ perceptions on co-planning engagement in health care services’, Public Management Review 16(3): 358–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilson, R. K. 1981. ‘Citizen coproduction as a mode of participation: conjectures and models’, Journal of Urban Affairs 3(4): 37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andersen, S. C. and Hjortskov, M. (2016). Cognitive biases in performance evaluations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(4), 647–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyne, G. A., James, O., John, P., and Petrovsky, N. (2009). Democracy and government performance: holding incumbents accountable in English local governments. The Journal of Politics, 71(4), 1273–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Charbonneau, E. and Van Ryzin, G. G. (2012). Performance measures and parental satisfaction with New York City schools. The American Review of Public Administration, 42(1), 54–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Favero, N. and Meier, K. J. (2013). Evaluating urban public schools: parents, teachers, and state assessments. Public Administration Review, 73(3), 401–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Filtenborg, A. F., Gaardboe, F. and Sigsgaard-Rasmussen, J. Experimental Replication: An experimental test of the expectancy disconfirmation theory of citizen satisfaction. Public Management Review (forthcoming).Google Scholar

Glaser, M. A. and Hildreth, B. W. (1999). Service delivery satisfaction and willingness to pay taxes: citizen recognition of local government performance. Public Productivity & Management Review, 23(1), 48–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grimmelikhuijsen, S. and Porumbescu, G. Revisiting the Expectancy Disconfirmation Model: Confirmation instead of Disconfirmation? Public Management Review (forthcoming).Google Scholar

Hatry, H. P. (2006). How Effective Are Your Community Services? Procedures for Performance Measurement. Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.Google Scholar

Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Jacobsen, R., Snyder, J. W., and Saultz, A. (2015). Understanding satisfaction with schools: the role of expectations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(3), 831–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

James, O. (2009). Evaluating the expectations disconfirmation and expectations anchoring approaches to citizen satisfaction with local public services. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19, 107–23.Google Scholar

James, O. (2011a). Managing citizens’ expectations of public service performance: evidence from observation and experimentation in local government. Public Administration, 89(4), 1419–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

James, O. (2011b). Performance measures and democracy: information effects on citizens in field and laboratory experiments. Journal of Public Administration Research, 21(3), 399–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

James, O. and John, P. (2007). Public management at the ballot box: performance information and electoral support for incumbent English local governments. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(4), 567–80.Google Scholar

James, O. and Moseley, A. (2014). Does performance information about public services affect citizen’s perceptions, satisfaction, and voice behaviour? Field experiments with absolute and relative performance information. Public Administration, 92(2), 493–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar

Kelly, J. M. and Swindell, D. (2002). A multiple–indicator approach to municipal service evaluation: correlating performance measurement and citizen satisfaction across jurisdictions. Public Administration Review, 62, 610–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Licari, M. J., McLean, W., and Rice, T. W. (2005). The condition of community streets and parks: a comparison of resident and nonresident evaluations. Public Administration Review, 65(3), 360–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lyons, W. E., Lowery, D., and DeHoog, R. H. (1992). The Politics of Dissatisfaction: Citizens, Services, and Urban Institutions. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar

Miller, T. I., Miller, M. A., Kobayashi, M. M., and Hayden, S. E. (2009). Citizen Surveys for Local Government: A Comprehensive Guide to Making Them Matter. Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.Google Scholar

Morgeson, F. V. (2013). Expectations, disconfirmation, and citizen satisfaction with the US federal government: testing and expanding the model. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(2), 289–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morgeson, F. V. (2014). Citizen Satisfaction: Improving Government Performance, Efficiency, and Citizen Trust. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oliver, R. L. (1977). Effect of expectation and disconfirmation on postexposure product evaluations: an alternative interpretation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(4), 480–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oliver, R. L. (2010). Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Olsen, A. L. (2015). Citizen (dis)satisfaction: an experimental equivalence framing study. Public Administration Review, 75(3), 469–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Petrovsky, N., Mok, J., and Cázares, F. L. (2016). Citizen expectations and satisfaction in a young democracy: a test of the expectancy-disconfirmation model. Public Administration Review. Early view, DOI: 10.1111/puar.12623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poister, T. H. and Thomas, J. C. (2011). The effect of expectations and expectancy confirmation/disconfirmation on motorists’ satisfaction with state highways. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(4), 601–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roch, C. H. and Poister, T. H. (2006). Citizens, accountability, and service satisfaction the influence of expectations. Urban Affairs Review, 41(3), 292–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stipak, B. (1979). Citizen satisfaction with urban services: potential misuse as a performance indicator. Public Administration Review, 39(1), 46–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stipak, B. (1980). Using clients to evaluate programs. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 5, 137–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Swindell, D., and Kelly, J. M. (2000). Linking citizen satisfaction data to performance measures: a preliminary evaluation Public Performance & Management Review, 24(1), 30–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Ryzin, G. G. (2004). Expectations, performance, and citizen satisfaction with urban services. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23(3), 433–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Ryzin, G. G. (2006). Testing the expectancy disconfirmation model of citizen satisfaction with local government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(4), 599–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Ryzin, G. G. (2013). An experimental test of the expectancy-disconfirmation theory of citizen satisfaction. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 32(3), 597–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Ryzin, G. G., Immerwahr, S., and Altman, S. (2008). Measuring street cleanliness: a comparison of New York City’s scorecard and results from a citizen survey. Public Administration Review, 68(2), 295–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Ryzin, G. G., Muzzio, D., Immerwahr, S., Gulick, L., and Martinez, E. (2004). Drivers and consequences of citizen satisfaction: an application of the American Customer Satisfaction Index model to New York City. Public Administration Review, 64(3), 331–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., and Parasuraman, A. (1993). The nature and determinants of customer expectations of service. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 21(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alicke, M. D. 2000. ‘Culpable control and the psychology of blame’. Psychological Bulletin 126(4): 556–574. doi: 10.1177/0146167208321594.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Arceneaux, K. and Stein, R. M.. 2006. ‘Who is held responsible when disaster strikes? The attribution of responsibility for a natural disaster in an urban election’. Journal of Urban Affairs 28(1): 43–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartling, B. and Fischbacher, U.. 2012. ‘Shifting the blame: on delegation and responsibility’. Review of Economic Studies 79(1): 67–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyne, G. A., James, O., John, P., and Petrovsky, N.. 2009. ‘Democracy and government performance: holding incumbents accountable in English local governments’. Journal of Politics 71(4): 1273–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeHoog, R. H., Lowery, D., and Lyons, W. E., 1990. ‘Citizen satisfaction with local governance: a test of individual, jurisdictional, and city-specific explanations’. Journal of Politics 52(3): 807–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dowding, K. M. and John, P.. 2012. Exits, Voices and Social Investments: Citizens’ Reaction to Public Services. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar