Aljaafreh, A. & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the Zone of Proximal Development. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 465–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Atkinson, D. (2010). Sociocognition: what it can mean for second language acquisition. In Batstone, R. (Ed.), Sociocognitive Perspectives on Language Use and Language Learning (pp. 24–39). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Atkinson, D., Churchill, E., Nishino, T. & Okada, H. (2007). Alignment and interaction in a sociocognitive approach to second language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 91, 169–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barcelos, A. M. F. (2003). Research beliefs about SLA: A critical review. In Kalaja, P., & Barcelos, A. M. F. (Eds.), Beliefs about SLA: New Research approaches (pp. 7–33). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Batstone, R. (2010). Issues and options in sociocognition. In Batstone, R. (Ed.), Sociocognitive Perspectives on Language Use and Language Learning (pp. 3–23). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bitchener, J. (2012). A reflection on ‘the language learning potential’ of written CF. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 348–63.Google Scholar

Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L. & Wylie, C. (Eds.) (2012). The Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Ellis, R. (2010). A framework for investigating oral and written corrective feedback. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 335–49.Google Scholar

Ferris, D. R. (2004). The ‘grammar correction’ debate in L2 writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime …?). Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 49–62.Google Scholar

Ferris, D. (2006). Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction. In Hyland, K. & Hyland, F. (Eds.), Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues, (pp. 81–104). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferris, D. R. (2010). Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 181–201.Google Scholar

Ferris, D. R. & Kurzer, K. (2018). Does error feedback help L2 writers? Latest evidence on the efficacy of written corrective feedback. In Hyland, K. & Hyland, F. (Eds.), Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues (2nd ed.) (page number to be assigned). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ferris, D. R., Liu, H., Sinha, A. & Senna, M. (2013). Written corrective feedback for individual L2 writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 307–29.Google Scholar

Ferris, D. R. & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 161–184.Google Scholar

Goldstein, L. (2006). Feedback and revision in second language writing: Contextual, teacher, and student variables. In Hyland, K. & Hyland, F. (Eds.), Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues (pp. 185–205). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Goldstein, L. & Conrad, S. (1990). Input and the negotiation of meaning in ESLl writing conferences. TESOL Quarterly, 24, 443–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Han, Y. (2017). Mediating and being mediated: Learner beliefs and learner engagement with written corrective feedback. System, 69, 133–42. doi:10.1016/j.system.2017.07.003Google Scholar

Han, Y. & Hyland, F. (in press). Academic emotions in written corrective feedback situations. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2018.12.003Google Scholar

Han, Y. & Hyland, F. (2017). Oral corrective feedback on L2 writing from a sociocultural perspective: A case study on two writing conferences in a Chinese university. Writing and Pedagogy, 8, 433–59. doi:10.1558/wap.27165CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Han, Y. & Hyland, F. (2015). Exploring learner engagement with written corrective feedback in a Chinese tertiary EFL classroom. Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, 31–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2015.08.002Google Scholar

Hyland, F. (1998). The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 255–86.Google Scholar

Hyland, F. (2000). ESL writers and feedback: Giving more autonomy to students. Language Teaching Research, 4, 33–54.Google Scholar

Hyland, F. (2003). Focus on form: student engagement with teacher feedback. System, 31, 217–30.Google Scholar

Hyland, F. & Hyland, K. (2001). Sugaring the pill: Praise and criticism in written feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 185–212.Google Scholar

Hyland, K. & Hyland, F. (2006a). Context and issues in feedback on L2 writing: An introduction. In Hyland, K. & Hyland, F. (Eds.), Feedback in Second Language Writing (pp. 1–20). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hyland, K. & Hyland, F. (2006b). Interpersonal aspects of response: Constructing and interpreting teacher written feedback. In Hyland, K. & Hyland, F. (Eds.), Feedback in Second Language Writing (pp. 206–24). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lantolf, J. P. & Appel, G. (1994). Theoretical framework: An introduction to Vygotskian Approaches to second language research. In Lantolf, J. P. & Appel, A. (Eds.), Vygotskian Approaches to Second Language Research (pp. 1–32). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar

Lee, I. (2008a). Understanding teachers’ written feedback practices in Hong Kong secondary classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, I. (2008b). Student reactions to teacher feedback in two Hong Kong secondary classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 144–64.Google Scholar

Lee, I. (2014). Revisiting teacher feedback in EFL writing from sociocultural perspectives. TESOL Quarterly, 48, 201–13. doi: 10.1002/tesq.153Google Scholar

Qi, D. S. & Lapkin, S. (2001). Exploring the role of noticing in a three-stage second language writing task. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 277–303.Google Scholar

Semke, H. (1984). Effects of the red pen. Foreign Language Annals, 17, 195–202.Google Scholar

Storch, N. & Wigglesworth, G. (2010). Learners’ processing, uptake, and retention of corrective feedback on writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 303–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing class. Language Learning, 46, 327–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Truscott, J. (2007). The effect of error correction on learners’ ability to write accuracy. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 255–72.Google Scholar

van Lier, L. (2004). The Ecology and Semiotics of Language Learning: A Sociocultural Perspective. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Villamil, O. S. & Guerrero, M. C. M. de (2006). Sociocultural theory: A framework for understanding the social-cognitive dimensions of peer feedback. In Hyland, K. & Hyland, F. (Eds.), Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues (pp. 23–41). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zhang, Z. & Hyland, K. (2018). Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing. Assessing Writing, 36: 90–102.Google Scholar

Zheng, Y., & Yu, S. (2018). Student engagement with teacher written corrective feedback in EFL writing: A case study of Chinese lower-proficiency students. Assessing Writing, 37, 13–24.Google Scholar

Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 102–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bloxham, S. & Boyd, P. (2007) Developing Effective Assessment in Higher Education. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Carless, D. (2006). Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education, 32(2), 219–33.Google Scholar

Christie, F. & Derewianka, B. (2008). School Discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Davison, C. (2007). Views from the chalkface: English language school-based assessment in Hong Kong. Language Assessment Quarterly, 4(1), 37–68.Google Scholar

Ferris, D. (2006). Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction. In Hyland, K. & Hyland, F. (Eds.) Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues. (pp. 81–104). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1971) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Hattie, J. & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirvela, A. (2011). Writing to learn in content areas. In Manchón, R. (Ed.), Learning-to-Write and Writing-to-Learn in an Additional Language. Amsterdam: BenjaminsGoogle Scholar

Hu, G. W. (2005). Contextual influences on instructional practices: A Chinese case for an ecological approach to ELT. TESOL Quarterly, 394, 635–60Google Scholar

Hyland, F. (2010). Future directions in feedback on second language writing: Overview and research agenda. International Journal of English Studies, 10(2), 171–82.Google Scholar

Hyland, K. (2013). Faculty feedback: Perceptions and practices in L2 disciplinary writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 240–53.Google Scholar

Hyland, F. & Hyland, K. (2001). ‘Sugaring the pill’: Praise and criticism in written feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10( 3), 185–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langer, J. & Applebee, A. (1987). How writing shapes thinking: A study of teaching and learning. NCTE Research Report, 22. Available at: http://eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED286205.pdf [Accessed June 4, 2012].Google Scholar

Lee, I. (2008). Understanding teachers’ written feedback practices in Hong Kong secondary classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

National Student Survey (2014). Available at: www.timeshighereducation.com/news/national-student-survey-2014-results-show-record-levels-of-satisfaction/2015108.article.Google Scholar

Orsmond, P. & Merry, S. (2011) Feedback alignment: effective and ineffective links between tutors’ and students’ understanding of coursework feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(2), 125–36.Google Scholar

Pokorny, H. & Pickford, P. (2010). Complexity, cues and relationships: Student perceptions of feedback. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11(1), 21–30Google Scholar

Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J. & O’Donovan, B. (2010). Feedback: All that effort, but what is the effect? Assessment and Evaluation in higher Education, 35(3), 277–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scott, J., Badge, J. & Cann, A. (2009). Perceptions of feedback one year on: A comparative study of the views of first and second year biological sciences students. Bioscience Education, 13. Available at: www.bioscience.heacademy.ac.uk/journal/vol13/beej-13-2.pdfGoogle Scholar

Simard, D., Guénette, D. & Bergeron, A. (2015). L2 learners’ interpretation and understanding of written corrective feedback: Insights from their metalinguistic reflections. Language Awareness, 24(3), 233–54.Google Scholar

Unsworth, M. (2014). Students’ views on feedback: insights into conceptions pf effectiveness, areas of dissatisfaction and emotional consequences. Innovations in Practice, 9(1), 23–31Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Walker, M. (2009). An investigation into written comments on assignments: do students find them usable? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(1), 47–78.Google Scholar

Watty, K, Carr, R, De Lange, P, O’Connell, B and Howieson, B. (2011), Student perceptions of feedback in Australian University accounting education. In Potter, Brad and De Lange, Paul (Eds.), Proceedings of 2011 AFAANZ Conference. Carlton: Australia, 2–5 July 2011, pp. 1–33.Google Scholar

Weaver, M. (2006). Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors’ written responses. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(3), 379–94.Google Scholar

Yorke, M. (2003) Formative assessment in higher education: moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice. Higher Education, 45(4), 471–501.Google Scholar

Zhang, V. & Hyland, K. (2018). Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing. Assessing Writing, 36, 90–103.Google Scholar

Bikowski, D. & Vithanage, R. (2016). Effects of web-based collaborative writing on individual L2 writing development. Language Learning & Technology, 20(1), 79–99.Google Scholar

Black, R. W. (2005). Access and affiliation: The literacy and composition practices of English language learners in an online fanfiction community. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 49(2), 118–28.Google Scholar

Boyd, M. & Maloof, V. M. (2000). How teachers can build on student-proposed intertextual links to facilitate student talk in the ESL classroom. In Hall, J. K. & Verplaetse, L S. (Eds.), Second and Foreign Language Learning through Classroom Interaction (pp. 163–82). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Brodahl, C., Hadjerrouit, S., & Hansen, N. K. (2011). Collaborative writing with web 2.0 technologies: education students’ perceptions. Journal of Information Technology Education, 10, IIP73–IIP103.Google Scholar

Cazden, C. (1988). Classroom Discourse: The Language of Teaching and Learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar

Chen, S., Diao, Y. & Zhang, J. (2011, September). Social media: Communication characteristics and application value in distance education. In Electrical and Control Engineering (ICECE), 2011 International Conference on (pp. 6774–6777). IEEE.Google Scholar

Damon, W. & Phelps, E. (1989). Strategic uses of peer learning in children’s education. In Berndt, T.. & Ladd, G. (Eds.), Peer Relationships in Child Development, (pp. 135–57). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In Kirschner, P. A. (Ed.), Three Worlds of CSCL: Can We Support CSCL? (pp. 69–91). Open Universiteit, Nederland: Heerlen.Google Scholar

Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. Vygotskian Approaches to Second Language Research, 33456.Google Scholar

Ellis, C. A., Gibbs, S. J. & Rein, G. L. (1991). Groupware: Some issues and experiences. Communications of the ACM, 34(1), 39–58.Google Scholar

Guardado, M. & Shi, L. (2007). ESL students’ experiences of online peer feedback. Computers and Composition, 24(4), 443–61.Google Scholar

Guerrero, M. C. M. de & Villamil, O. S. (1994). Social‐cognitive dimensions of interaction in L2 peer revision. The Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 484–496.Google Scholar

Guerrero, M. C. M. de & Villamil, O. S. (2000). Activating the ZPD: Mutual scaffolding in L2 peer revision. The Modern Language Journal, 84(1), 51–68.Google Scholar

Harrison, R. & Thomas, M. (2009). Identity in online communities: Social networking sites and language learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society, 7(2), 109.Google Scholar

Hedgcock, J. & Ferris, D. R. (2013). Teaching L2 Composition: Purpose, Process, and Practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ho, M. C. & Savignon, S. J. (2007). Face-to-face and computer-mediated peer review in EFL writing. CALICO Journal, 269–90.Google Scholar

Hsieh, H. F. & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–88.Google Scholar

Jenkins, H., Purushotma, R., Weigel, M., Clinton, K. & Robison, A. J. (2009). Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education For the 21st Century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kasper, G. (2009). L2 pragmatic development. The New Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, 2, 259–84.Google Scholar

Kessler, G., Bikowski, D. & Boggs, J. (2012). Collaborative writing among second language learners in academic web-based projects. Language Learning & Technology, 16(1), 91–109.Google Scholar

Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–91.Google Scholar

Lidz, C. S. (1991). Practitioner’s Guide to Dynamic Assessment. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Liu, J. & Sadler, R. (2003). The effect and affect of peer review in electronic versus traditional modes on L2 writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2, 193–227.Google Scholar

Mehisto, P. (2012). Excellence in Bilingual Education: A Guide for School Principals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Olson, J. S., Wang, D., Zhang, J. & Olson, G. M. (2017). How people write together now: Beginning the investigation with advanced undergraduates in a project course. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 24(1), 1–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Posner, I. & Baecker, R. (1992). How People Write Together. Proceedings 25th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Vol IV, 1992, 127–38.Google Scholar

Richardson, W. (2010). Blogs, Wikis, Podcasts, and Other Powerful Web Tools for Classrooms. New York: Corwin Press.Google Scholar

Rommetveit, R. (1985). Language acquisition as increasing linguistic structuring of experience and symbolic behavior control. Culture, Communication, and Cognition: Vygotskian Perspectives, 183–204.Google Scholar

Saddler, B. & Graham, S. (2005). The effects of peer-assisted sentence-combining instruction on the writing performance of more and less skilled young writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(1), 43.Google Scholar

Sengupta, S. (2001). Exchanging ideas with peers in network-based classrooms: An aid or a pain? Language Learning & Technology, 15(1), 103–34.Google Scholar

Sinclair, J. M. & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Stevenson, M. P. & Liu, M. (2013). Learning a language with Web 2.0: Exploring the use of social networking features of foreign language learning websites. CALICO Journal, 27(2), 233–59.Google Scholar

Storch, N. (2002). Relationships formed in dyadic interaction and opportunity for learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(3), 305–22.Google Scholar

Strobl, C. (2014). Affordances of web 2.0 technologies for collaborative advanced writing in a foreign language. CALICO Journal, 1, 1–18.Google Scholar

Sun, Y. C. & Chang, Y. J. (2012). Blogging to learn- Becoming EFL academic writers through collaborative dialogues. Language Learning & Technology, 16(1), 43–61.Google Scholar

Thorne, S. L. (2003). Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 38–67.Google Scholar

Thorne, S. L. & Black, R. W. (2007). Language and literacy development in computer-mediated contexts and communities. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 27, 133–60.Google Scholar

Trentin, G. (2009). Using a wiki to evaluate individual contribution to a collaborative learning project. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(1), 43–55.Google Scholar

van Lier, L. (2000). From input to affordance: Social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning, 245.Google Scholar

Villamil, O. S. & Guerrero, M. C. M. de (1996). Peer revision in the L2 classroom: Social-cognitive activities, mediating strategies, and aspects of social behavior. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5(1), 51–75.Google Scholar

Villamil, O. S. & Guerrero, M. C. M. de (2006). Sociocultural theory: A framework for understanding the social-cognitive dimensions of peer feedback. In Hyland, K. & Hyland, F. (Eds.). Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues. (pp. 246–65). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Warschauer, M. (1997). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and practice. The Modern Language Journal, (81)4, Special Issue: Interaction, Collaboration, and Cooperation: Learning Languages and Preparing Language Teachers. (Winter, 1997), 470–81.Google Scholar

Weissberg, R. (2006). Scaffolded feedback: Tutorial conversations with advanced L2 writers. In Hyland, K. & Hyland, F. (Eds.). Feedback in Second Language Writing. Contexts and Issues. (pp. 246–65). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wood, D., Bruner, J. S. & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100.Google Scholar

Yim, S. (2017). Digital literacy in academic settings: Synchronous collaborative writing among linguistically diverse students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Irvine. U.S.A.Google Scholar

Yim, S., Wang, D., Olson, J., Vu, V., & Warschauer, M. (2017). Synchronous Collaborative Writing in the Classroom: Undergraduates’ Collaboration Practices and their Impact on Writing Style, Quality, and Quantity. Proceedings of the 20th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yim, S., & Warschauer, M. (2017). Web-based collaborative writing in L2 contexts- Methodological insights from text mining. Language Learning & Technology, 21(1), 146–65.Google Scholar