Pregnancy, Labor, and Delivery Complications Causing Brain Injury

Section 2 - Pregnancy, Labor, and Delivery Complications Causing Brain Injury

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 December 2017

Edited by

Susan R. Hintz and

David K. Stevenson: Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
William E. Benitz: Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Philip Sunshine: Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Susan R. Hintz: Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Maurice L. Druzin: Affiliation:
Stanford University, California

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: Fetal and Neonatal Brain Injury , pp. 67 - 246

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316275498 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

World Health Organization. Prevention of perinatal morbidity. In Public Health Papers 42. Geneva: WHO, 1969.Google Scholar

Nelson, KB, Ellenberg, JH. Antecedents of cerebral palsy: multivariate analysis of risk. N Engl J Med 1986; 315: 81–6.Google Scholar

Martin, JA, Hamilton, BE, Osterman, MJK, et al. Births: Final Data for 2013. National Vital Statistic Reports, vol. 64, no. 1. Hyattsvill, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 2015.Google Scholar

Spong, CY. Prediction and prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110: 404–15.Google Scholar

Cooper, RK, Goldenberg, RL, Creasy, RK, et al. A multicenter study of preterm birth weight and gestational age specific mortality. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 168: 78–84.Google Scholar

Ferrara, TB, Hoekstra, RE, Couser, RS, et al. Survival and follow-up of infants born at 23–26 weeks’ gestational age: effects of surfactant therapy. J Pediatr 1994; 124: 119–24.Google Scholar

Hack, M, Fanaroff, AA. Outcomes of children of extremely low birth weight and gestational age in the 1990s. Early Hum Dev 1999; 53: 193–218.Google Scholar

Gunn, AJ, Quaedackers, JS, Guan, J, et al. The premature fetus: not as defenseless as we thought, but still paradoxically vulnerable? Dev Neurosci 2001; 23: 175–9.Google Scholar

Fedrick, J, Anderson, ABM. Factors associated with spontaneous preterm birth. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1976; 83: 342–50.Google Scholar

US Department of Health and Human Services. Report of the Secretary’s Task Force on Black and Minority Health (Publication 0-487-637 [QL3]), vol. 6: Infant Mortality and Low Birth Weight. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 1985.Google Scholar

Bakketeig, LS, Hoffman, HJ. Epidemiology of preterm birth: results from longitudinal study of births in Norway. In Elder, MG, Dendricks, CH, eds., Preterm Labour. London: Butterworths, 1981: 17–46.Google Scholar

Abrams, B, Newman, V, Key, T, et al. Maternal weight gain and preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 74: 577–83.Google Scholar

MacGregor, SW, Keith, LG, Chasnoff, IJ, et al. Cocaine use during pregnancy: adverse perinatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 57: 686–90.Google Scholar

Shiono, PH, Klebanoff, MA, Rhoads, GG. Smoking and drinking during pregnancy. JAMA 1986; 255: 82–4.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Keirse, M, Rush, R, Anderson, A, et al. Risk of pre-term delivery in patients with previous preterm delivery and/or abortion. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1978; 85: 81–5.Google Scholar

Linn, S, Schoenbaum, S, Monson, R, et al. The relationship between induced abortion and outcome of subsequent pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983; 146: 136–40.Google Scholar

Wilson-Costello, D, Friedman, H, Minich, N, et al. Improved survival rates with increased neurodevelopmental disability for extremely low birth weight infants in the 1990s. Pediatrics 2005; 115: 997–1003.Google Scholar

Back, SA, Rivkees, SA. Emerging concepts in periventricular white matter injury. Semin Perinatol 2004; 28: 405–14.Google Scholar

Leviton, A, Paneth, N. White matter damage in preterm newborns: an epidemiologic perspective. Early Hum Dev 1990; 24: 1–22.Google Scholar

Barrett, RD, Bennet, L, Davidson, J, et al. Destruction and reconstruction: hypoxia and the developing brain. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today 2007; 81: 163–76.Google Scholar

Meis, PJ, MacErnest, J, Moore, ML. Causes of low birth weight births in public and private patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 156: 1165–8.Google Scholar

Bobbitt, JR, Ledger, WJ. Unrecognized amnionitis and prematurity: a preliminary report. J Reprod Med 1977; 19: 8–12.Google Scholar

Bobbitt, JR, Ledger, WJ. Amniotic fluid analysis: its role in maternal and neonatal infection. Obstet Gynecol 1978; 51: 56–62.Google Scholar

Leigh, J, Garite, TJM. Amnionitis and the management of premature labor. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 67: 500–6.Google Scholar

Gravett, MG, Hummel, D, Eschenbach, DA, et al. Preterm labor associated with subclinical amniotic infection and with bacterial vaginosis. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 67: 229–37.Google Scholar

Hameed, C, Teiane, N, Verma, UL, et al. Silent chorioamnionitis as a cause of preterm labor refractory to tocolytic therapy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 149: 726–30.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Duff, P, Kopelman, JN. Subclinical intraamniotic infection in asymptomatic patients with refractory preterm labor. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 69: 756–69.Google Scholar

Kaltreider, DF, Kohl, S. Epidemiology of preterm delivery. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1980; 23: 17–31.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Taylor, J, Garite, TJ. Premature rupture of membranes before fetal viability. Obstet Gynecol 1984; 64: 615–20.Google Scholar

Mead, PB. Management of the patient with premature rupture of the membranes. Clin Perinatol 1980; 7: 243–55.Google Scholar

Kennedy, KA, Clark, SL. Premature rupture of the membranes: management controversies. Clin Perinatol 1992; 19: 385–97.Google Scholar

Artal, JP, Sokol, RJ, Newman, M, et al. The mechanical properties of prematurely and non-prematurely ruptured membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1976; 125: 655–9.Google Scholar

Lavery, JP, Miller, CE, Knight, RD. The effect of labor on the rheologic response of chorioamniotic membranes. Obstet Gynecol 1982; 60: 87–91.Google Scholar

Naeye, RL. Factors that predispose to premature rupture of the fetal membranes. Obstet Gynecol 1982; 60: 93–8.Google Scholar PubMed

Lonky, NN, Hayashi, RH. A proposed mechanism for premature rupture of membranes. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1988; 43: 22–8.Google Scholar

Minkoff, H, Grunebaum, AN, Schwarz, RH, et al. Risk factors for prematurity and premature rupture of membranes: a prospective study of vaginal flora in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 150: 965–72.Google Scholar

Iams, JD, McGregor, JA. Cervicovaginal microflora and pregnancy outcome: results of a double blind, placebo-controlled trial of erythromycin treatment. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163: 1580–91.Google Scholar

Garite, TJ, Freeman, RK, Linzy, EM, et al. Prospective randomized study of corticosteroids in the management of premature rupture of membranes and the premature gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981; 141: 508–15.Google Scholar

Gibbs, RS, Blanco, JD, St Clair, PJ, et al. Quantitative bacteriology of amniotic fluid from patients with clinical intraamniotic infection at term. J Infect Dis 1982; 145: 1–8.Google Scholar

Yoder, PR, Gibbs, RS, Blanco, JD, et al. A prospective controlled study of maternal and perinatal outcome after intra-amniotic infection at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983; 145: 695–701.Google Scholar

Garite, TJ, Freeman, RK. Chorioamnionitis in the preterm gestation. Obstet Gynecol 1982; 54: 539–45.Google Scholar

Gabbe, SG, Ettinger, BB, Freeman, RK, et al. Umbilical cord compression associated with amniotomy: laboratory observations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1976; 126: 353–6.Google Scholar

Wilson, JC, Levy, DC, Wilds, PL. Premature rupture of membranes prior to term: consquences of non-intervention. Obstet Gynecol 1982; 60: 601–6.Google Scholar

Morretti, M, Sibai, BM. Maternal and perinatal outcome of expectant management of premature rupture of membranes in the mid-trimester. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 159: 390–6.Google Scholar

Major, CA, Kitzmiller, JL. Perinatal survival with expectant management of mid-trimester rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163: 838–44.Google Scholar

Lindner, W, Pohlandt, F, Grab, D, et al. Acute respiratory failure and short-term outcome after premature rupture of the membranes and oligohydramnios before 20 weeks of gestation. J Pediatr 2002; 140(2): 177–182.Google Scholar

Resch, B, Resch, E, Maurer-Fellbaum, U, et al. The whole spectrum of cystic periventricular leukomalacia of the preterm infant: results from a large consecutive case series. Childs Nerv Syst 2015; 31(9):1527–32.Google Scholar

Ekin, A, Gezer, C, Taner, CY, et al. Risk factors and perinatal outcomes associated with latency in preterm premature rupture of membranes between 24 and 34 weeks of gestation. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2014; 290: 449–55.Google Scholar

Iams, JD. Prevention of preterm parturition. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 254–61.Google Scholar

Zemlyn, S. The length of the uterine cervix and its significance. J Clin Ultrasound 1981; 9: 267–9.Google Scholar

Rush, RLO. Incidence of preterm delivery in patients with previous preterm delivery and/or abortion. S Afr Med J 1979; 56: 1085–7.Google Scholar

Rust, OA, Atlas, RO, Jones, KJ, et al. A randomized trial of cerclage versus no cerclage among patients with ultrasonographically detected second-trimester preterm dilatation of the internal os. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183: 830–5.Google Scholar

Berghella, V, Odibo, AO, Tolosa, JE. Cerclage for prevention of preterm birth in women with a short cervix found on transvaginal ultrasound examination: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 1311–17.Google Scholar

To, MS, Alfirevic, Z, Heath, VCF, et al. Cervical cerclage for prevention of preterm delivery in women with short cervix: randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2004; 363: 1849–53.Google Scholar

Althusius, SM, Dekker, GA, Hummel, P, et al. Final results of the cervical incompetence prevention randomized cerclage trial (CIPRACT): therapeutic cerclage with bed rest versus bed rest alone. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185: 1106–12.Google Scholar

Owen, J, Hankins, G, Iams, JD, et al. Multicenter randomized trial of cerclage for preterm birth prevention in high-risk women with shortened midtrimester cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201(375): e1–8.Google Scholar

Meis, PJ, Klebanoff, M, Thom, E, et al. Prevention of recurrent preterm delivery by 17α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate. N Eng J Med 2003; 384: 2379–85.Google Scholar

Althuisius, SM, Dekker, GA, Hummel, P, et al. Cervical incompetence prevention randomized cerclage trial: emergency cerclage with bed rest versus bed rest alone. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189: 907–10.Google Scholar

Hassan, SS, Romero, R, Vidyadhari, D, et al. Vaginal progesterone reduces the rate of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 38: 18–31.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Herbst, AL, Hubby, MM, Blough, RR, et al. A comparison of pregnancy experiment in DES-exposed and DES-unexposed daughters. J Reprod Med 1980; 24: 62–9.Google Scholar

Kaufman, RH, Noller, K, Adam, E, et al. Upper genital tract abnormalities and pregnancy outcome in diethylstilbestrol-exposed progeny. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 148: 973–84.Google Scholar

Iams, JD, Goldenberg, RL, Mercer, BM, et al. The preterm prediction study: recurrence risk of spontaneous preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 178: 1035–40.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Papiernik, E, Kaminski, M. Multifactorial study of the risk of prematurity at 32 weeks of gestation. J Perinat Med 1974; 2: 30–6.Google Scholar

Chung, C, Smith, R, Steinhoff, P, et al. Induced abortion and spontaneous fetal loss in subsequent pregnancies. Am J Public Health 1982; 72: 548–54.Google Scholar

US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. Vital Statistics of the United States, 1982, vol. 1: Natality. Hyattsville, MD: Department of Health, 1986.Google Scholar

Neilson, JP, Verkuyl, DAA, Crowther, CA, et al. Preterm labor in twin pregnancies: prediction by cervical assessment. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 72: 719–23.Google Scholar

Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Clinic Summary Report: All SART Member Clinics. Available at www.sartcorsonline.com/rptCSR_PublicMultYear.aspx?ClinicPKID=0.Google Scholar

Elliot, JP. High order multiple gestations. Semin Perinatol 2005; 5: 305–11.Google Scholar

Dunietz, GL, Holzman, C, McKane, P, et al. Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of preterm birth among primiparas. Fertil Steril, 2015; 103(4): 974–9.Google Scholar

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare National Perinatal Statistics Unit. Assisted Conception in Australia and New Zealand. Sydney: AIHW, 1992.Google Scholar

Williams, MA, Millendorf, R, Liererman, E, et al. Adverse infant outcomes associated with first trimester vaginal bleeding. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 78: 14–8.Google Scholar

Roberts, G. Unclassified antepartum haemorrhage incidence and perinatal mortality in a community. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonwlth 1970; 77: 492–5.Google Scholar

Peaceman, AM, Andrews, WW, Thorp, JM, et al. Fetal fibronectin as a predictor of preterm birth in patients with symptoms: a multicenter trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 13–18.Google Scholar

Iams, JD, Goldenberg, RL, Meis, PJ, et al. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous preterm delivery. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 567–72.Google Scholar

Mercer, BM, Arheart, KL. Antimicrobial therapy in expectant management of preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Lancet 1995; 346: 1271–9.Google Scholar

Mercer, BM, Miodovnik, M, Thurnau, GR, et al. Antibiotic therapy for reduction of infant morbidity after preterm premature rupture of the membranes: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1997; 278: 989–95.Google Scholar

Usher, R. Changing mortality rates with perinatal intensive care and regionalization. Semin Perinatol 1977; 1: 309–19Google Scholar

Gortmaker, S, Sobol, A, Clark, C, et al. The survival of very low-birth weight infants by level of hospital of birth: a population study of perinatal systems in four states. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 152: 517–24.Google Scholar

Kitchen, W, Ford, G, Orgill, A, et al. Outcome in infants with birth weight 500–999 grams: a regional study of 1979 and 1980 births. J Pediatr 1984; 104: 921–7.Google Scholar

Hadlock, FP, Harrist, RB, Carpenter, RJ, et al. Sonographic estimation of fetal weight: the value of fetal length in addition to head and abdominal measurements. Radiology 1984; 152: 497–501.CrossRef Google Scholar

Seeds, JW, Cefalo, RL, Bowes, WA. Femur lengths in the estimation of fetal weight less than 1500 grams. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 149: 233–5.Google Scholar

National Institutes of Health. Consensus Statement: Effect of Antenatal Steroids for Fetal Maturation on Perinatal Outcomes. Bethesda, MD: NIH, 1994: 1–24.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Antenatal corticosteroid therapy for fetal maturation. Committee Opinion No. 677. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128: e187–94.Google Scholar

Rouse, D, Hirtz, DG, Thom, E, et al. A randomized controlled trial of magnesium sulfate for the prevention of cerebral palsy. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 895–905.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Constantine, MM, Weiner, SJ. Effects of antenatal exposure to magnesium sulfate on neuroprotection and mortality in preterm infants: a meta-analysis. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114: 354–64.Google Scholar

Little, WJ. On the influence of abnormal parturition, difficult labors, premature birth, and asphyxia neonatorum on the mental and physical condition of the child, especially in relation to deformities. Trans Obstet Soc Lond 1862; 2: 293–344.Google Scholar

Freud, S. Die infantile Cerebrallähmung. Vienna: Hölder, 1897.Google Scholar

Blair, E, Stanley, FJ. Intrapartum asphyxia: a rare cause of cerebral palsy. J Pediatr 1988; 112: 515–19.Google Scholar

Committee on Obstetrics, Maternal and Fetal Medicine. Fetal and neonatal neurologic injury. ACOG Technical Bulletin 163. ACOG, Washington, DC, 1992.Google Scholar

Naeye, RL, Peters, EC, Bartholomew, M, et al. Origins of cerebral palsy. Am J Dis Child 1989; 143: 1154–6.Google Scholar

Myers, RE, Myers, SE. Use of sedative, analgesic and anesthetic drugs during labor and delivery: bane or boon. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979; 133: 83–108.Google Scholar

Low, JA, Gallbraith, RS, Muir, DW, et al. Factors associated with motor and cognitive deficits in children after intrapartum fetal hypoxia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 148: 533–9.Google Scholar

Bowes, WA, Gabbe, S, Bowes, C. Fetal heart rate monitoring in premature infants weighing 1500 grams or less. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980; 137: 791–6.Google Scholar

Westgren, LMR, Malcus, P, Sveningsen, NW. Intrauterine asphyxia and longterm outcome in preterm fetuses. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 67: 512–16.Google Scholar

Low, JA, Killen, H, Derrick, J. The prediction of asphyxia in preterm pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 186: 279–82.Google Scholar

Low, JA, Killen, H, Derrick, J. Antepartum fetal asphyxia in the preterm pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 188: 461–5.Google Scholar

Low, JA. Determining the contribution of asphyxia to brain damage in the neonate. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2004; 30: 276–86.Google Scholar

Low, JA, Boston, RW, Pancham, FR. Fetal asphyxia during the intrapartum period in intrauterine growth retarded infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1972; 113: 351–7.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Westgran, LMR, Malcus, P, Svenningsen, NW. Intrauterine asphyxia and long-term outcome in preterm fetuses. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 67: 512–16.Google Scholar

Nageotte, MP, Freeman, RK, Garite, TJ, et al. Prophylactic intrapartum amnioinfusion in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 153: 557–62.Google Scholar

Goldenberg, RL, Huddlestone, JF, Nelson, KG. Apgar scores and umbilical arterial pH in preterm newborn infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 149: 651–4.Google Scholar

Olshan, AF, Shy, KK, Luthy, DA. Cesarean birth and neonatal mortality in very low birth weight infants. Obstet Gynecol 1984; 64: 267–70.Google Scholar

Yu, VYH, Bajak, B, Cutting, D, et al. Effect of mode of delivery on outcome of very low birth weight infants. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1984; 91: 633–9.Google Scholar

Kithen, W, Ford, GW, Doyle, LW, et al. Cesarean section or vaginal delivery at 24 to 28 weeks’ gestation: comparison of survival and neonatal and two year morbidity. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 66: 149–57.Google Scholar

Alfirevic, Z, Milan, SJ, Livio, S. Caesarean section versus vaginal delivery for preterm birth in singletons. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 9: CD000078.Google Scholar

Goldenberg, RL, Davis, RO. En caul delivery of the very premature infant. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983; 145: 645–6.Google Scholar

Hannah, ME, Hannah, WJ, Hewson, SA, et al. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 2000; 356: 1375–83.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Bergenhenegouwen, LA, Meertens, LJ, Schaaf, J, et al. Vaginal delivery versus caesarean section in preterm breech delivery: a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2014; 172: 1–6.Google Scholar

Richmond, JR, Morin, L, Benjamin, A. Extremely preterm vaginal breech delivery en caul. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 99: 1025–30.Google Scholar

Tucker Edmonds, B, McKenzie, F, Macheras, M, et al. Morbidity and mortality associated with mode of delivery for breech periviable deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213(1): e1–12.Google Scholar

Tejani, N, Verma, U, Hameed, C, et al. Method and route of delivery in the low birth weight vertex presentation correlated with early periventricular/intraventricular hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 69: 1–4.Google Scholar

Schwarz, DB, Miodovnik, MK, Lavin, JP Jr. Neonatal outcome among low birth weight infants delivered spontaneously or by low forceps. Obstet Gynecol 1983; 62: 283–6.Google Scholar

Kriewall, TJ. Structural, mechanical, and material properties of fetal cranial bone. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 143: 707–14.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lee, HC, Gould, JB. Survival advantage associated with cesarean delivery in very low birth weight vertex neonates. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 97–105.Google Scholar

Lee, HC, Gould, JB. Survival rates and mode of delivery for vertex preterm neonates according to small- or appropriate-for-gestational-age status. Pediatrics 2007; 1118: e1836–44.Google Scholar

Druzin, ML. Atraumatic delivery in cases of malpresentation of the very low birth weight fetus at cesarean section: the splint technique. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 154: 941–2.Google Scholar

Barzilay, E, Mazaki-Tovi, S, Amikam, U, et al. Mode of delivery of twin gestation with very low birth weight: is vaginal delivery safe? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213:219.e1–8.Google Scholar

Sentilhes, L, Oppenheimer, A, Bouhours, A-C, et al. Neonatal outcome of very preterm twins: policy of planned vaginal or cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213(73): e1–7.Google Scholar

Barret, JFR, Hannah, ME, Hutton, EK et al. A randomized trial of planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 1295–1305.Google Scholar

Rabe, H, Diaz-Rossello, JL, Duley, L, Dowswell, T. Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping and other strategies to influence placental transfusion at preterm birth on maternal and infant outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 8: CD003248.Google Scholar

Rabe, H, Reynolds, G, Diaz-Rossello, J. A systematic review and meta-analysis of a brief delay in clamping the umbilical cord of preterm infants. Neonatology 2008; 93(2): 138–144.Google Scholar

Glass, HC, Costarino, AT, Stayer, SA, et al. Outcomes for extremely premature infants. Anesth Anag 2015; 120: 1337–51.Google Scholar

References

Martin, JA, Hamilton, BE, Osterman, MJ, et al. Births: final data for 2013. National Vital Statistics Reports: From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System 2015; 64(1): 1–65.Google Scholar

March of Dimes. Peri Stats, 2008. Available at www.marchofdimes.com/peristats.Google Scholar

Alberman, ED. Cerebral palsy in twins. Guy’s Hosp Rep 1964; 113: 285–95.Google Scholar

Goodman, R. Cerebral palsy in twins. Dev Med Child Neurol 1993; 35(4): 370.Google Scholar

Livinec, F, Ancel, PY, Marret, S, et al. Prenatal risk factors for cerebral palsy in very preterm singletons and twins. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105(6): 1341–7.Google Scholar

Petterson, B, Nelson, KB, Watson, L, Stanley, F. Twins, triplets, and cerebral palsy in births in Western Australia in the 1980s. BMJ 1993; 307(6914): 1239–43.Google Scholar

Pharoah, PO. Twins and cerebral palsy. Acta Paediatr 2001; 90(436): 6–10.Google Scholar

Thorngren-Jerneck, K, Herbst, A. Perinatal factors associated with cerebral palsy in children born in Sweden. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108(6): 1499–1505.Google Scholar

Cunningham, FG. Williams obstetrics, 24th edn. New York: McGraw-Hill Medical, 2014.Google Scholar

Sadler, TW. Langman’s Medical Embryology, 13th edn. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer, 2015.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Multifetal gestations: twin, triplet, and higher-order multifetal pregnancies (ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 144). Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123(5): 1118–32.Google Scholar

Monteagudo, A, Timor-Tritsch, IE, Sharma, S. Early and simple determination of chorionic and amniotic type in multifetal gestations in the first fourteen weeks by high-frequency transvaginal ultrasonography. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170(3): 824–9.Google Scholar

Scardo, JA, Ellings, JM, Newman, RB. Prospective determination of chorionicity, amnionicity, and zygosity in twin gestations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 173(5): 1376–80.Google Scholar

Blumenfeld, YJ, Momirova, V, Rouse, DJ, et al. Accuracy of sonographic chorionicity classification in twin gestations. J Ultrasound Med 2014; 33(12): 2187–92.Google Scholar

Gardner, MO, Goldenberg, RL, Cliver, SP, et al. The origin and outcome of preterm twin pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 85(4): 553–7.Google Scholar

Newman, RB, Iams, JD, Das, A, et al. A prospective masked observational study of uterine contraction frequency in twins. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195(6): 1564–70.Google Scholar

Romero, R, Espinoza, J, Kusanovic, JP, et al. The preterm parturition syndrome. BJOG 2006; 113(Suppl. 3): 17–42.Google Scholar

Nassar, AH, Usta, IM, Rechdan, JB, et al. Pregnancy outcome in spontaneous twins versus twins who were conceived through in vitro fertilization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189(2): 513–18.Google Scholar

Goldenberg, RL, Iams, JD, Das, A, et al. The Preterm Prediction Study: sequential cervical length and fetal fibronectin testing for the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182(3): 636–43.Google Scholar

Lockwood, CJ, Senyei, AE, Dische, MR, et al. Fetal fibronectin in cervical and vaginal secretions as a predictor of preterm delivery. N Engl J Med 1991; 325(10): 669–74.Google Scholar

Gibson, JL, Macara, LM, Owen, P, et al. Prediction of preterm delivery in twin pregnancy: a prospective, observational study of cervical length and fetal fibronectin testing. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 23(6): 561–6.Google Scholar

Goldenberg, RL, Iams, JD, Miodovnik, M, et al. The preterm prediction study: risk factors in twin gestations. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 175(4 Pt 1): 1047–53.Google Scholar

Ruiz, RJ, Fullerton, J, Brown, CE. The utility of fFN for the prediction of preterm birth in twin gestations. JOGNN 2004; 33(4): 446–54.Google Scholar

Fox, NS, Saltzman, DH, Klauser, CK, et al. Prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in asymptomatic twin pregnancies with the use of combined fetal fibronectin and cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201(3):e313–15.Google Scholar

Berghella, V, Odibo, AO, To, MS, et al. Cerclage for short cervix on ultrasonography: meta-analysis of trials using individual patient-level data. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106(1): 181–9.Google Scholar

Dor, J, Shalev, J, Mashiach, S, et al. Elective cervical suture of twin pregnancies diagnosed ultrasonically in the first trimester following induced ovulation. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1982; 13(1): 55–60.Google Scholar

MRC/RCOG Working Party on Cervical Cerclage. Interim report of the Medical Research Council/Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists multicentre randomized trial of cervical cerclage. BJOG 1988; 95(5): 437–45.Google Scholar

Eskandar, M, Shafiq, H, Almushait, MA, et al. Cervical cerclage for prevention of preterm birth in women with twin pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2007; 99(2): 110–12.Google Scholar

Roman, AS, Rebarber, A, Pereira, L, et al. The efficacy of sonographically indicated cerclage in multiple gestations. J Ultrasound Med 2005; 24(6): 763–8; quiz 770.Google Scholar

Newman, RB, Krombach, RS, Myers, MC, McGee, DL. Effect of cerclage on obstetrical outcome in twin gestations with a shortened cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186(4): 634–40.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Roman, A, Rochelson, B, Fox, NS, et al. Efficacy of ultrasound-indicated cerclage in twin pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212(6): e781–6.Google Scholar

Meis, PJ, Klebanoff, M, Thom, E, et al. Prevention of recurrent preterm delivery by 17α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate. N Engl J Med 2003; 348(24): 2379–85.Google Scholar

Rouse, DJ, Caritis, SN, Peaceman, AM, et al. A trial of 17α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate to prevent prematurity in twins. N Engl J Med 2007; 357(5): 454–61.Google Scholar

Fonseca, EB, Celik, E, Parra, M, et al. Fetal Medicine Foundation second trimester screening G: progesterone and the risk of preterm birth among women with a short cervix. N Engl J Med 2007; 357(5): 462–9.Google Scholar

Brubaker, SG, Pessel, C, Zork, N, et al. Vaginal progesterone in women with twin gestations complicated by short cervix: a retrospective cohort study. BJOG 2015; 122(5): 712–18.Google Scholar

Goya, M, Pratcorona, L, Merced, C, et al. Cervical pessary in pregnant women with a short cervix (PECEP): an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012; 379(9828): 1800–6.Google Scholar

Hales, KA, Matthews, JP, Rayburn, WF, Atkinson, BD. Intravenous magnesium sulfate for premature labor: comparison between twin and singleton gestations. Am J Perinatol 1995; 12(1): 7–10.Google Scholar

O’Leary, JA. Prophylactic tocolysis of twins. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 154(4): 904–5.Google Scholar

Lyell, DJ, Pullen, K, Campbell, L, et al. Magnesium sulfate compared with nifedipine for acute tocolysis of preterm labor: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110(1): 61–7.Google Scholar

Milki, AA, Jun, SH, Hinckley, MD, et al. Incidence of monozygotic twinning with blastocyst transfer compared to cleavage-stage transfer. Fertil Steril 2003; 79(3): 503–6.Google Scholar

Moayeri, SE, Behr, B, Lathi, RB, et al. Risk of monozygotic twinning with blastocyst transfer decreases over time: an 8-year experience. Fertil Steril 2007; 87(5): 1028–32.Google Scholar

Adegbite, AL, Castille, S, Ward, S, Bajoria, R. Neuromorbidity in preterm twins in relation to chorionicity and discordant birth weight. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190(1): 156–63.Google Scholar

Bejar, R, Vigliocco, G, Gramajo, H, et al. Antenatal origin of neurologic damage in newborn infants. II. Multiple gestations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162(5): 1230–6.Google Scholar

Bahtiyar, MO, Dulay, AT, Weeks, BP, et al. Prevalence of congenital heart defects in monochorionic/diamniotic twin gestations: a systematic literature review. J Ultrasound Med 2007; 26(11): 1491–8.Google Scholar

Pettit, KE, Merchant, M, Machin, GA, et al. Congenital heart defects in a large, unselected cohort of monochorionic twins. J Perinatol 2013; 33(6): 457–61.Google Scholar

Okumura, A, Hayakawa, F, Kato, T, et al. Brain malformation of the surviving twin of intrauterine co-twin demise. J Child Neurol 2007; 22(1): 85–8.Google Scholar

Morokuma, S, Tsukimori, K, Anami, A, et al. Brain injury of the survivor diagnosed at 18 weeks of gestation after intrauterine demise of the co-twin: a case report. Fetal Diagn Ther 2008; 23(2): 146–8.Google Scholar

Righini, A, Salmona, S, Bianchini, E, et al. Prenatal magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of ischemic brain lesions in the survivors of monochorionic twin pregnancies: report of 3 cases. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004; 28(1): 87–92.Google Scholar

Ezra, Y, Shveiky, D, Ophir, E, et al. Intensive management and early delivery reduce antenatal mortality in monoamniotic twin pregnancies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005; 84(5): 432–5.Google Scholar

Minakami, H, Sato, I. Reestimating date of delivery in multifetal pregnancies. JAMA 1996; 275(18): 1432–4.Google Scholar

Kahn, B, Lumey, LH, Zybert, PA, et al. Prospective risk of fetal death in singleton, twin, and triplet gestations: implications for practice. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102(4): 685–92.Google Scholar

Hack, KE, Derks, JB, Elias, SG, et al. Increased perinatal mortality and morbidity in monochorionic versus dichorionic twin pregnancies: clinical implications of a large Dutch cohort study. BJOG 2008; 115(1): 58–67.Google Scholar

Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Simpson, LL. Twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 208(1): 3–18.Google Scholar

Bajoria, R, Wigglesworth, J, Fisk, NM. Angioarchitecture of monochorionic placentas in relation to the twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172(3): 856–63.Google Scholar

Lutfi, S, Allen, VM, Fahey, J, et al. Twin-twin transfusion syndrome: a population-based study. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104(6): 1289–97.Google Scholar

Quintero, RA, Morales, WJ, Allen, MH, et al. Staging of twin-twin transfusion syndrome. J Perinatol 1999; 19(8 Pt 1): 550–5.Google Scholar

Rychik, J, Tian, Z, Bebbington, M, et al. The twin-twin transfusion syndrome: spectrum of cardiovascular abnormality and development of a cardiovascular score to assess severity of disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197(4): e391–8.Google Scholar

Chescheir, NC, Seeds, JW. Polyhydramnios and oligohydramnios in twin gestations. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 71(6 Pt 1): 882–4.Google Scholar

Luks, FI, Carr, SR, Plevyak, M, et al. Limited prognostic value of a staging system for twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. Fetal Diagn Ther 2004; 19(3): 301–4.Google Scholar

Mari, G, Roberts, A, Detti, L, et al. Perinatal morbidity and mortality rates in severe twin-twin transfusion syndrome: results of the International Amnioreduction Registry. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185(3): 708–15.Google Scholar

Senat, MV, Deprest, J, Boulvain, M, et al. Endoscopic laser surgery versus serial amnioreduction for severe twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. N Engl J Med 2004; 351(2): 136–44.Google Scholar

Crombleholme, TM, Shera, D, Lee, H, et al. A prospective, randomized, multicenter trial of amnioreduction vs selective fetoscopic laser photocoagulation for the treatment of severe twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197(4): e391–9.Google Scholar

Ruano, R, Rodo, C, Peiro, JL, et al. Fetoscopic laser ablation of placental anastomoses in twin-twin transfusion syndrome using ‘Solomon technique’. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42(4): 434–9.Google Scholar

Papanna, R, Block-Abraham, D, Mann, LK, et al. Risk factors associated with preterm delivery after fetoscopic laser ablation for twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 43(1): 48–53.Google Scholar

Degani, S, Leibovitz, Z, Shapiro, I, et al. Instability of Doppler cerebral blood flow in monochorionic twins. J Ultrasound Med 2006; 25(4): 449–54.Google Scholar

Lopriore, E, Nagel, HT, Vandenbussche, FP, Walther, FJ. Long-term neurodevelopmental outcome in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189(5): 1314–19.Google Scholar

Graef, C, Ellenrieder, B, Hecher, K, et al. Long-term neurodevelopmental outcome of 167 children after intrauterine laser treatment for severe twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194(2): 303–8.Google Scholar

Lopriore, E, Middeldorp, JM, Sueters, M, et al. Long-term neurodevelopmental outcome in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome treated with fetoscopic laser surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 196(3): e231–4.Google Scholar

Lopriore, E, Ortibus, E, Acosta-Rojas, R, et al. Risk factors for neurodevelopment impairment in twin-twin transfusion syndrome treated with fetoscopic laser surgery. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113(2 Pt 1): 361–6.Google Scholar

Masheer, S, Maheen, H, Munim, S. Perinatal outcome of twin pregnancies according to chorionicity: an observational study from tertiary care hospital. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015; 28(1): 23–5.Google Scholar

Amaru, RC, Bush, MC, Berkowitz, RL, et al. Is discordant growth in twins an independent risk factor for adverse neonatal outcome? Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103(1): 71–6.Google Scholar

Branum, AM, Schoendorf, KC. The effect of birth weight discordance on twin neonatal mortality. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 101(3): 570–4.Google Scholar

Demissie, K, Ananth, CV, Martin, J, et al. Fetal and neonatal mortality among twin gestations in the United States: the role of intrapair birth weight discordance. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 100(3): 474–80.Google Scholar

Gratacos, E, Carreras, E, Becker, J, et al. Prevalence of neurological damage in monochorionic twins with selective intrauterine growth restriction and intermittent absent or reversed end-diastolic umbilical artery flow. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 24(2): 159–63.Google Scholar

Gulmezoglu, AM, Hofmeyr, GJ. Bed rest in hospital for suspected impaired fetal growth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000(2): CD000034.Google Scholar

Chasen, ST, Spiro, SJ, Kalish, RB, Chervenak, FA. Changes in fetal presentation in twin pregnancies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2005; 17(1): 45–48.Google Scholar

Yang, Q, Wen, SW, Chen, Y, et al. Neonatal death and morbidity in vertex-nonvertex second twins according to mode of delivery and birth weight. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192(3): 840–7.Google Scholar

Barrett, JF, Hannah, ME, Hutton, EK, et al. A randomized trial of planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy. N Engl J Med 2013; 369(14): 1295–1305.Google Scholar

Fox, NS, Silverstein, M, Bender, S, et al. Active second-stage management in twin pregnancies undergoing planned vaginal delivery in a U.S. population. Obstet gynecol. 2010; 115(2 Pt 1): 229–233.Google Scholar

Davison, L, Easterling, TR, Jackson, JC, Benedetti, TJ. Breech extraction of low-birth-weight second twins: can cesarean section be justified? Am j obstet gynecol 1992; 166(2): 497–502.Google Scholar

Morales, WJ, O’Brien, WF, Knuppel, RA, Gaylord, S, Hayes, P. The effect of mode of delivery on the risk of intraventricular hemorrhage in nondiscordant twin gestations under 1500 g. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 73(1): 107–10.Google Scholar

Ford, AA, Bateman, BT, Simpson, LL. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in twin gestations: a large, nationwide sample of deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195(4): 1138–42.Google Scholar

Miller, DA, Mullin, P, Hou, D, Paul, RH. Vaginal birth after cesarean section in twin gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 175(1): 194–8.Google Scholar

Sansregret, A, Bujold, E, Gauthier, RJ. Twin delivery after a previous caesarean: a twelve-year experience. J Obstet Gynaecol Canada 2003; 25(4): 294–8.Google Scholar

References

Rozance, PJ, Brown, LD, Thorn, SR, et al. Intrauterine growth restriction and the small-for-gestational-age infant. In MacDonald, MG, Seshia, MMK, eds., Avery’s Neonatology: Pathophysiology and Management of the Newborn, 7th edn. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health, 2015.Google Scholar

Smart, J. Undernutrition, learning and memory: review of experimental studies. In Taylor, TG, Jenkins, NK, eds. Proceedings of XII International Congress of Nutrition. London: John Libbey, 1986: 74.Google Scholar

Cruz-Martínez, R, Figueras, F, Hernandez-Andrade, E, et al. Fetal brain Doppler to predict cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal status in term small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117: 618–26.Google Scholar

Simmons, RA, Gounis, AS, Bangalore, SA, Ogata, ES. Intrauterine growth retardation: fetal glucose transport is diminished in lung but spared in brain. Pediatr Res 1992; 32: 59–63.Google Scholar

Poudel, R, McMillen, IC, Dunn, SL, et al. Impact of chronic hypoxemia on blood flow to the brain, heart, and adrenal gland in the late-gestation IUGR sheep fetus. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2015; 308: R151–62.Google Scholar

Castillo-Melendez, M, Yawno, T, Allison, BJ, et al. Cerebrovascular adaptations to chronic hypoxia in the growth restricted lamb. Int J Dev Neurosci 2015; 29:ii.Google Scholar

Toft, PB, Leth, H, Ring, PB, et al. Volumetric analysis of the normal infant brain and in intrauterine growth retardation. Early Hum Dev 1995; 43: 15–29.Google Scholar

Østgård, HF, Løhaugen, GC, Bjuland, KJ, et al. Brain morphometry and cognition in young adults born small for gestational age at term. J Pediatr 2014; 165: 921–7.Google Scholar

Lager, S, Powell, TL. Regulation of nutrient transport across the placenta. J Pregnancy 2012; 2012: 179827.Google Scholar

Gaccioli, F, Aye, IL, Roos, S, et al. Expression and functional characterisation of system L amino acid transporters in the human term placenta. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2015; 9(13):57.Google Scholar

Lepercq, J, Hauguel De Mouzo, SJ. Leptin during pregnancy. Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2002; 31: 167–72.Google Scholar

Symonds, ME, Pope, M, Sharkey, D, Budge, H. Adipose tissue and fetal programming. Diabetologia 2012; 55: 1597–606.Google Scholar

Rosario, FJ, Schumacher, MA, Jiang, J, et al. Chronic maternal infusion of full-length adiponectin in pregnant mice down-regulates placental amino acid transporter activity and expression and decreases fetal growth. J Physiol 2012; 15(590): 1495–509.Google Scholar

Limesand, SW, Jensen, J, Hutton, JC, Hay, WW Jr. Diminished beta-cell replication contributes to reduced beta-cell mass in fetal sheep with intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2005; 288: R1297–305.Google Scholar

Rozance, PJ, Anderson, M, Martinez, M, et al. Placental insufficiency decreases pancreatic vascularity and disrupts hepatocyte growth factor signaling in the pancreatic islet endothelial cell in fetal sheep. Diabetes 2015; 64: 555–64.Google Scholar

Andrews, SE, Brown, LD, Thorn, SR, et al. Increased adrenergic signaling is responsible for decreased glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in the chronically hyperinsulinemic ovine fetus. Endocrinology 2015; 156: 367–76.Google Scholar

Fowden, Al. The insulin-like growth factors and feto-placental growth. Placenta 2003; 24(8–9): 803–12.Google Scholar

Ye, P, Carson, J, D’Ercole, AJ. In vivo actions of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) on brain myelination: studies of IGF-I and IGF binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1) transgenic mice. J Neurosci 1995; 15: 7344.Google Scholar

Abuzzahab, MJ, Schneider, A, Goddard, A, et al. Intrauterine Growth Retardation (IUGR) Study Group. IFG-I receptor mutations resulting in intrauterine and postnatal growth retardation. N Engl J Med 2003; 349(23): 2211–22.Google Scholar

Baumann, MU, Schneider, H, Malek, A, et al. Regulation of human trophoblast GLUT1 glucose transporter by insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I). PLoS One 2014; 9(8):e106037.Google Scholar

Sferruzzi-Perri, AN, Vaughan, OR, Forhead, AJ, Fowden, AL. Hormonal and nutritional drivers of intrauterine growth. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2013; 16: 298–309.Google Scholar

Gressens, P, Hill, JM, Paindaveine, B, et al. Severe microcephaly induced by blockade of vasoactive intestinal peptide function in the primitive neuroepithelium of the mouse. J Clin Invest 1994; 94: 2020–7.Google Scholar

Nicolaides, KH, Economides, DL, Soothill, PW. Blood gases, pH, and lactate in appropriate- and small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 996–1001.Google Scholar

Scholl, TO, Hediger, ML, Schall, JI, et al. Maternal growth during pregnancy and the competition for nutrients. Am J Clin Nutr 1994; 60: 183–8.Google Scholar

Klein, JO, Baker, CJ, Remington, JS, et al. Current concepts of infection of the fetus and newborn infants. In Remington, JS, Klein, JO, Wilson, CB, Baker, CJ, eds., Infectious Diseases of the Fetus and Newborn Infant, 6th edn. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders, 2006: 1–25.Google Scholar

Kleigman, RM. Intrauterine growth restriction. In Fanaroff, AA, Martin, RJ, Walsh, MC, eds., Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine: Diseases of the Fetus and Infant, 5th edn. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier, 2006: 221–306.Google Scholar

Ananth, CV, Friedman, AM. Ischemic placental disease and risks of perinatal mortality and morbidity and neurodevelopmental outcomes. Semin Perinatol 2014; 38: 151–8.Google Scholar

Roos, S, Powell, TL, Jansson, T. Placental mTOR links maternal nutrient availability to fetal growth. Biochem Soc Trans 2009; 37: 295–8.Google Scholar

Lumey, LH. Decreased birth weights in infants after maternal in utero exposure to the Dutch famine of 1944–1945. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 1992; 6: 240–53.Google Scholar

Catalano, PM, McIntyre, HD, Cruickshank, JK, et al. HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group. The hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcome study: associations of GDM and obesity with pregnancy outcomes. Diabetes Care 2012; 35: 780–6.Google Scholar

Hernandez, TL, Van Pelt, RE, Anderson, MA, et al. A higher-complex carbohydrate diet in gestational diabetes mellitus achieves glucose targets and lowers postprandial lipids: a randomized crossover study. Diabetes Care 2014; 37: 1254–62.Google Scholar

Crume, TL, Shapiro, AL, Brinton, JT, et al. Maternal fuels and metabolic measures during pregnancy and neonatal body composition: the healthy start study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2015; 100: 1672–80.Google Scholar

Ota, E, Mori, R, Middleton, P, et al. Zinc supplementation for improving pregnancy and infant outcome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 2(2):CD000230.Google Scholar

Butterworth, RF. Maternal thiamine deficiency: still a problem in some world communities. Am J Clin Nutr 2001; 74: 712–13.Google Scholar

Conti, J, Abraham, S, Taylor, A. Eating behavior and pregnancy outcome. J Psychosom Res 1998; 44: 465–77.Google Scholar

Many, A, Fattal, A, Leitner, Y, et al. Neurodevelopmental and cognitive assessment of children born growth restricted to mothers with and without preeclampsia. Hypertens Pregnancy 2003; 22: 25–9.Google Scholar

Manuck, T, Branch, DW, Lai, Y, et al. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Antiphospholipid antibodies and pregnancy outcomes in women heterozygous for factor V Leiden. J Reprod Immunol 2010; 85: 180–5.Google Scholar

Triche, EW, Hossain, N. Environmental factors implicated in the causation of diverse pregnancy outcome. Semin Perinatol 2007; 31: 240–2.Google Scholar

Blatt, K, Moore, E, Chen, A, et al. Association of reported trimester-specific smoking cessation with fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 125: 1452–9.Google Scholar

Kallen, K. Maternal smoking during pregnancy and infant head circumference at birth. Early Hum Dev 2000; 58: 197–204.Google Scholar

Carter, RC, Jacobson, JL, Sokol, RJ, et al. Fetal alcohol-related growth restriction from birth through young adulthood and moderating effects of maternal prepregnancy weight. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2013; 37: 452–62.Google Scholar

Little, BB, Snell, LM. Brain growth among fetuses exposed to cocaine in utero: asymmetrical growth retardation. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 77: 361–4.Google Scholar

Frank, DA, Bauchner, H, Parker, S, et al. Neonatal body proportionality and body composition after in utero exposure to cocaine and marijuana. J Pediatr 1990; 117: 622–6.Google Scholar

Christian, MS, Brent, RL. Teratogen update: evaluation of the reproductive and developmental risks of caffeine. Teratology 2001; 64: 51–78.Google Scholar

Giussani, DA, Salinas, CE, Villena, M. The role of oxygen in prenatal growth: studies in the chick embryo. J Physiol 2007; 585: 911–17.Google Scholar

Milley, JR. Ovine fetal leucine kinetics and protein metabolism during decreased oxygen availability. Am J Physiol 1998; 274:e618–26.Google Scholar

Illsley, NP, Caniggia, I, Zamudio, S. Placental metabolic reprogramming: do changes in the mix of energy-generating substrates modulate fetal growth? Int J Dev Biol 2010; 54: 409–19.Google Scholar

Soria, R, Julian, CG, Vargas, E, et al. Graduated effects of high-altitude hypoxia and highland ancestry on birth size. Pediatr Res 2013; 74: 633–8.Google Scholar

Wilson, MJ, Lopez, M, Vargas, M, et al. Greater uterine artery blood flow during pregnancy in multigenerational (Andean) than shorter-term (European) high-altitude residents. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2007; 293: R1313–24.Google Scholar

Bennett, A, Sain, SR, Vargas, E, Moore, LG. The effect of heavy maternal workload on fetal growth retardation and preterm delivery: a study among southern Thai women. J Occup Environ Med 1998; 40: 1013–21.Google Scholar

Tuntiseranee, P, Geater, A, Chongsuvivatwong, V, Kor-anantakul, O. The effect of heavy maternal workload on fetal growth retardation and preterm delivery: a study among southern Thai women. J Occup Environ Med 1998; 40: 1013–21.Google Scholar

Koos, BJ, Longo, LD. Mercury toxicity in the pregnant woman, fetus, and newborn infant: a review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1976; 126: 390–409.Google Scholar

Albu, AR, Horhoianu, IA, Dumitrascu, MC, Horhoianu, V. Growth assessment in diagnosis of fetal growth restriction. J Med Life 2014; 5(7): 150–4.Google Scholar

Grivell, RM, Wong, L, Bhatia, V. Regimens of fetal surveillance for impaired fetal growth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 6:CD007113.Google Scholar

Businelli, C, de Wit, C, Visser, GH, Pistorius, LR. Ultrasound evaluation of cortical brain development in fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2014; 10: 1–6.Google Scholar

Hershkovitz, R, Kingdom, JC, Geary, M, Rodeck, CH. Fetal cerebral blood flow redistribution in late gestation: identification of compromise in small fetuses with normal umbilical artery Doppler. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 15: 209–12.Google Scholar

Flood, K, Unterscheider, J, Daly, S, et al. The role of brain sparing in the prediction of adverse outcomes in intrauterine growth restriction: results of the multicenter PORTO Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211(288):e1–5.Google Scholar

Cruz-Martinez, R, Tenorio, V, Padilla, N, et al. Risk of neonatal brain ultrasound abnormalities in intrauterine growth restricted fetuses born between 28 and 34 weeks: relationship with gestational age at birth and fetal Doppler. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 46:389–90.Google Scholar

Girardi, G. MRI-based methods to detect placental and fetal brain abnormalities in utero. J Reprod Immunol 2015; 2:pii: S0165–0378(15)00094–7.Google Scholar

Marconi, AM, Ronzoni, S, Vailati, S, et al. Neonatal morbidity and mortality in intrauterine growth restricted (IUGR) pregnancies is predicated upon prenatal diagnosis of clinical severity. Reprod Sci 2009; 16: 373–9.Google Scholar

Marconi, AM, Paolini, CL, Zerbe, G, Battaglia, FC. Lactacidemia in intrauterine growth restricted (IUGR) pregnancies: relationship to clinical severity, oxygenation and placental weight. Pediatr Res 2006; 59: 570–4.Google Scholar

Regnault, TR, de Vrijer, B, Galan, HL, et al. Development and mechanisms of fetal hypoxia in severe fetal growth restriction. Placenta 2007; 28: 714–23.Google Scholar

Salihagić-Kadić, A, Medić, M, Jugović, D, et al. Fetal cerebrovascular response to chronic hypoxia: implications for the prevention of brain damage. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2006; 19: 387–96.Google Scholar

Figueras, F, Eixarch, E, Meler, E, et al. Small-for-gestational-age fetuses with normal umbilical artery Doppler have suboptimal perinatal and neurodevelopmental outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008; 136: 34–8.Google Scholar

Bendapudi, P, Rao, GG, Greenough, A. Diagnosis and management of persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2015; 16: 157–61.Google Scholar

Harris, DL, Weston, PJ, Harding, JE. Incidence of neonatal hypoglycemia in babies identified as at risk. J Pediatr 2012; 161: 787–91.Google Scholar

Hawdon, JM, Aynsley-Green, A, Ward Platt, MP. Neonatal blood glucose concentrations: metabolic effects of intravenous glucagon and intragastric medium chain triglyceride. Arch Dis Child 1993; 68: 255–61.Google Scholar

Limesand, SW, Rozance, PJ, Smith, D, Hay, WW Jr. Increased insulin sensitivity and maintenance of glucose utilization rates in fetal sheep with placental insufficiency and intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2007; 293: E1716–25.Google Scholar

van Kempen, AA, Ackermans, MT, Endert, E, et al. Glucose production in response to glucagon is comparable in preterm AGA and SGA infants. Clin Nutr 2005; 24: 727–36.Google Scholar

Arya, VB, Flanagan, SE, Kumaran, A, et al. Clinical and molecular characterization of hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia in infants born small-for-gestational age. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2013; 98: F356–8.Google Scholar

Macko, AR, Yates, DT, Chen, X, et al. Elevated plasma norepinephrine inhibits insulin secretion, but adrenergic blockade reveals enhanced β-cell responsiveness in an ovine model of placental insufficiency at 0.7 of gestation. J Dev Orig Health Dis 2013; 4: 402–10.Google Scholar

Gatford, KL, Simmons, RA. Prenatal programming of insulin secretion in intrauterine growth restriction. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2013; 56: 520–8.Google Scholar

Law, TL, Korte, JE, Katikaneni, LD, et al. Ultrasound assessment of intrauterine growth restriction: relationship to neonatal body composition. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205(255):e1–6.Google Scholar

Thorn, SR, Regnault, TRH, Brown, LD, et al. Intrauterine growth restriction increases fetal hepatic gluconeogenic capacity and reduces hepatic and skeletal muscle mRNA translation initiation and nutrient sensing. Endocrinology 2009; 150: 3021–30.Google Scholar

Thorn, SR, Brown, LD, Rozance, PJ, et al. Increased hepatic glucose production in fetal sheep with intrauterine growth restriction is not suppressed by insulin. Diabetes 2013; 62: 65–73.Google Scholar

Jain, A, Agarwal, R, Sankar, MJ, et al. Hypocalcemia in the newborn. Ind J Pediatr 2010; 77: 1123–8.Google Scholar

Bauer, J, Masin, M, Brodner, K. Resting energy expenditure and metabolic parameters in small for gestational age moderately preterm infants. Horm Res Paediatr 2011; 76: 202–7.Google Scholar

Glasser, I, Sutten, N, Schmeling, M, Machan, JT. A comprehensive study of umbilical cord blood cell developmental changes and reference ranges by gestation, gender and mode of delivery. J Perinatol 2015; 35: 469–75.Google Scholar

Basha, S, Surendran, N, Pichichero, M. Immune responses in neonates. Exp Rev Clin Immunol 2014; 10: 1171–84.Google Scholar

Kempley, S, Gupta, N, Linsell, L, et al. Feeding infants below 29 weeks’ gestation with abnormal antenatal Doppler: analysis from a randomised trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2014; 99: F6–11.Google Scholar

Abdelmaaboud, M, Mohammed, A. Early versus late minimal enteral feeding in weeks preterm growth-restricted neonates with abnormal antenatal Doppler studies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012 (epub ahead of print).Google Scholar

Leaf, A, Dorling, J, Kempley, S, et al. Abnormal Doppler Enteral Prescription Trial Collaborative Group. Early or delayed enteral feeding for preterm growth-restricted infants: a randomized trial. Pediatrics 2012; 129: e1260–8.Google Scholar

Pettigrew, AG, Edwards, DA, Henderson-Smart, DJ. The influence of intra-uterine growth retardation on brainstem development of preterm infants. Dev Med Child Neurol 1985; 27: 467–72.Google Scholar

Stanley, OH, Fleming, PJ, Morgan, MH. Development of visual evoked potentials following intrauterine growth retardation. Early Hum Dev 1991; 27: 79–91.Google Scholar

Scherjon, S, Briët, J, Oosting, H, Kok, J. The discrepancy between maturation of visual-evoked potentials and cognitive outcome at five years in very preterm infants with and without hemodynamic signs of fetal brain-sparing. Pediatrics 2000; 105: 385–91.Google Scholar

Nijhuis, IJ, ten Hof, J, Nijhuis, JG, et al. Temporal organization of fetal behavior from 24-weeks gestation onwards in normal and complicated pregnancies. Dev Psychobiol 1999; 34: 257–68.Google Scholar

Leventhal, JM, Berg, A, Egerter, SA. Is intrauterine growth retardation a risk factor for child abuse? Pediatrics 1987; 79: 515–19.Google Scholar

Watt, J. Interaction and development in the first year. II. The effects of intrauterine growth retardation. Early Hum Dev 1986; 13: 211–23.Google Scholar

Pallotto, EK, Killbride, HW. Perinatal outcome and later implications of intrauterine growth restriction. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2006; 49: 257–69.Google Scholar

Ortibus, E, Lopriore, E, Deprest, J, et al. The pregnancy and long-term neurodevelopmental outcome of monochorionic diamniotic twin gestations: a multicenter prospective cohort study from the first trimester onward. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 200(494):e1–8.Google Scholar

von Beckerath, AK, Kollmann, M, Rotky-Fast, C, et al. Perinatal complications and long-term neurodevelopmental outcome of infants with intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 208(130):e1–6.Google Scholar

Levine, TA, Grunau, RE, McAuliffe, FM, et al. Early childhood neurodevelopment after intrauterine growth restriction: a systematic review. Pediatrics 2015; 135: 126–41.Google Scholar

Wang, Y, Fu, W, Liu, J. Neurodevelopment in children with intrauterine growth restriction: adverse effects and interventions. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2015; 23: 1–9.Google Scholar

Murray, E, Fernandes, M, Fazel, M, et al. Differential effect of intrauterine growth restriction on childhood neurodevelopment: a systematic review. BJOG 2015; 122: 1062–72.Google Scholar

Casey, PH. Growth of low birth weight preterm children. Semin Perinatol 2008; 32: 20–7.Google Scholar

Rogne, T, Engstrøm, AA, Jacobsen, GW, et al. Fetal growth, cognitive function, and brain volumes in childhood and adolescence. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 125: 673–82.Google Scholar

McIntyre, S, Blair, E, Badawi, N, et al. Antecedents of cerebral palsy and perinatal death in term and late preterm singletons. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122: 869–77.Google Scholar

Hack, M. Effects of intrauterine growth retardation on mental performance and behavior outcomes during adolescence and adulthood. Eur J Clin Nutr 1998; 52: S65–70.Google Scholar

Yerushalmy-Feler, A, Marom, R, Peylan, T, et al. Electroencephalographic characteristics in preterm infants born with intrauterine growth restriction. J Pediatr 2014; 164: 756–61.Google Scholar

Simić Klarić, A, Kolundžić, Z, Galić, S. Language development inpreschool children born after asymmetrical intrautering growth retardation. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2012; 16: 132–7.Google Scholar

Ortigosa Rocha, C, Bittar, RE, Zugaib, M. Neonatal outcomes of late-preterm birth associated or not with intrauterine growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol Int 2010; 2010: 231842.Google Scholar

Fattal-Valevski, A, Leitner, Y, Kutai, M, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome in children with intrauterine growth retardation: a 3-year follow-up. J Child Neurol 1999; 14: 724–7.Google Scholar

De Jesus, LC, Pappas, A, Shankaran, S, et al. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Outcomes of small for gestational age infants born at <27 weeks’ gestation. J Pediatr 2013; 163(55–60):e1–3.Google Scholar

Guellec, I, Lapillonne, A, Renolleau, S, et al. Neurologic outcomes at school age in very preterm infants born with severe or mild growth restriction. Pediatrics 2011; 127: e883–91.Google Scholar

Aucott, SW, Donohue, PK, Northington, FJ. Increased morbidity in severe early intrauterine growth restriction. J Perinatol 2004; 24: 435–40.Google Scholar

Christian, P. Fetal growth restriction and preterm as determinants of child growth in the first two years and potential interventions. Nestle Nutr Inst Workshop Ser 2014; 78: 81–91.Google Scholar

Baker, J, Workman, M, Bedrick, E, et al. Brains versus brawn: an empirical test of Barker’s brain sparing model. Am J Hum Biol 2010; 22: 206–15.Google Scholar

Basilious, A, Yager, J, Fehlings, MG. Neurological outcomes of animal models of uterine artery ligation and relevance to human intrauterine growth restriction: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol 2015; 57: 420–30.Google Scholar

Piorkowska, K, Thompson, J, Nygard, K, et al. Synaptic development and neuronal myelination are altered with growth restriction in fetal guinea pigs. Dev Neurosci 2014; 36: 465–76.Google Scholar

Hack, M, Breslau, N, Weissman, B, et al. Effect of very low birth weight and subnormal head size on cognitive abilities at school age. N Engl J Med 1991; 325: 231–7.Google Scholar

Lundgren, EM, Tuvemo, T. Effects of being born small for gestational age on long-term intellectual performance. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008; 22: 477–88.Google Scholar

Paz, I, Seidman, DS, Danon, YL, et al. Are children born small for gestational age at increased risk of short stature? Am J Dis Child 1993; 147: 337–9.Google Scholar

Bergvall, N, Iliadou, A, Johansson, S, et al. Risks for low intellectual performance related to being born small for gestational age are modified by gestational age. Pediatrics 2006; 117: e460–7.Google Scholar

Monset-Couchard, M, de Bethmann, O. Catch-up growth in 166 small-forgestational age premature infants weighing less than 1,000 g at birth. Biol Neonate 2000; 78: 161–7.Google Scholar

de Bie, HM, de Ruiter, MB, Ouwendijk, M, et al. Using fMRI to investigate memory in young children born small for gestational age. PLoS One 2015; 1(10):e0129721.Google Scholar

Spinillo, A, Gardella, B, Preti, E, et al. Rates of neonatal death and cerebral palsy associated with fetal growth restriction among very low birth weight infants: a temporal analysis. BJOG 2006; 113: 775–80.Google Scholar

MacLennan, AH, Thompson, SC, Gecz, J. Cerebral palsy: causes, pathways, and the role of genetic variants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213: 779–88.Google Scholar

Blair, EM, Nelson, KB. Fetal growth restriction and risk of cerebral palsy in singletons born after at least 35 weeks’ gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212(520):e1–7.Google Scholar

O’Callaghan, ME, MacLennan, AH, Gibson, CS, et al. Epidemiologic associations with cerebral palsy. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 118: 576–82.Google Scholar

Spence, D, Alderdice, FA, Stewart, MC, et al. Does intrauterine growth restriction affect quality of life in adulthood? Arch Dis Child 2007; 92: 700–3.Google Scholar

Geva, R, Eshel, R, Leitner, Y, et al. Neuropsychological outcome of children with intrauterine growth restriction: a 9-year prospective study. Pediatrics 2006; 118: 91–100.Google Scholar

Bergvall, N, Iliadou, A, Tuvemo, T, Cnattingius, S. Birth characteristics and risk of low intellectual performance in early adulthood: are the associations confounded by socioeconomic factors in adolescence or familial effects? Pediatrics 2006; 117: 714–21.Google Scholar

Leonard, H, Nassar, N, Bourke, J, et al. Relation between intrauterine growth and subsequent intellectual disability in a ten-year population cohort of children in Western Australia. Am J Epidemiol 2008; 167: 103–11.Google Scholar

Leitner, Y, Fattal-Valevski, A, Geva, R, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome of children with intrauterine growth retardation: a longitudinal, 10-year prospective study. J Child Neurol 2007; 22: 580–7.Google Scholar

Barker, DJ, Gluckman, PD, Godfrey, KM, et al. Fetal nutrition and cardiovascular disease in adult life. Lancet 1993; 341: 938–41.Google Scholar

Gortner, L. Intrauterine growth restriction and risk for arterial hypertension: a causal relationship? J Perinat Med 2007; 35: 361–5.Google Scholar

Ong, TP, Ozanne, SE. Developmental programming of type 2 diabetes: early nutrition and epigenetic mechanisms. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2015; 18: 354–60.Google Scholar

Duque-Guimarães, DE, Ozanne, SE. Nutritional programming of insulin resistance: causes and consequences. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2013; 245: 525–35.Google Scholar

Forsén, T, Eriksson, J, Tuomilehto, J, et al. The fetal and childhood growth of persons who develop type 2 diabetes. Ann Intern Med 2000; 133: 176–82.Google Scholar

Gluckman, PD, Hanson, MA, Cooper, C, Thornburg, KL. Effect of in utero and early-life conditions on adult health and disease. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 61–73.Google Scholar

Sayer, AA, Syddall, H, Martin, H, et al. The developmental origins of sarcopenia. J Nutr Health Aging 2008; 12: 427–32.Google Scholar

Koklu, E, Ozturk, MA, Kurtoglu, S, et al. Aortic intima-media thickness, serum IGF-I, IGFBP-3, and leptin levels in intrauterine growth-restricted newborns of healthy mothers. Pediatr Res 2007; 62: 704–9.Google Scholar

Skilton, MR, Evans, N, Griffiths, KA, et al. Aortic wall thickness in newborns with intrauterine growth restriction. Lancet 2005; 365: 1484–6.Google Scholar

Bloomfield, FH, Oliver, MH, Harding, JE. The late effects of fetal growth patterns. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2006; 91: F299–304.Google Scholar

Barker, DJ, Eriksson, JG, Forsen, T, Osmond, C. Fetal origins of adult disease: strength of effects and biological basis. Int J Epidemiol 2002; 31: 1235–9.Google Scholar

Bujold, E, Roberge, S, Lacasse, Y, et al. Prevention of preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction with aspirin started in early pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116: 402–14.Google Scholar

Satterfield, MC, Bazer, FW, Spencer, TE, Wu, G. Sildenafil citrate treatment enhances amino acid availability in the conceptus and fetal growth in an ovine model of intrauterine growth restriction. J Nutr 2010; 140: 251–8.Google Scholar

de Boo, HA, Eremia, SC, Bloomfield, FH, et al. Treatment of intrautere growth restriction with maternal growth hormone supplementation in sheep. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199(599):e1–9.Google Scholar

Rozance, PJ, Limesand, SW, Barry, JS, et al. Glucose replacement to euglycemia causes hypoxia, acidosis, and decreased insulin secretion in fetal sheep with intrauterine growth restriction. Pediatr Res 2009; 65: 72–8.Google Scholar

Rush, D, Stein, Z, Susser, M. A randomized controlled trial of prenatal nutritional supplementation in New York City. Pediatrics 1980; 65: 683–97.Google Scholar

Ceesay, SM, Prentice, AM, Cole, TJ, et al. Effects on birth weight and perinatal mortality of maternal dietary supplements in rural Gambia: 5 year randomised controlled trial. BMJ 1997; 315: 786–90.Google Scholar

Gulmezoglu, AM, Hofmeyr, GJ. Maternal nutrient supplementation for suspected impaired fetal growth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; 2: CD000148.Google Scholar

Catalano, PM, Thomas, AJ, Huston, LP, Fung, CM. Effect of maternal metabolism on fetal growth and body composition. Diabetes Care. 1998; 21(Suppl. 2):B85–90.Google Scholar

Fernandez-Twinn, DS, Ozanne, SE. Mechanisms by which poor early growth programs type-2 diabetes, obesity and the metabolic syndrome. Physiol Behav 2006; 88: 234–43.Google Scholar

Gulmezoglu, AM, Hofmeyr, GJ. Plasma volume expansion for suspected impaired fetal growth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; 2: CD000167.Google Scholar

Gulmezoglu, AM, Hofmeyr, GJ. Bed rest in hospital for suspected impaired fetal growth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; 2: CD000034.Google Scholar

Kinzler, WL, Kaminsky, L. Fetal growth restriction and subsequent pregnancy risks. Semin Perinatol 2007; 31: 126–34.Google Scholar

Brenner, B, Aharon, A. Thrombophilia and adverse pregnancy outcome. Clin Perinatol 2007; 34: 527–41.Google Scholar

Brown, LD, Green, AS, Limesand, SW, Rozance, PJ. Maternal amino acid supplementation for intrauterine growth restriction. Front Biosci (Schol Ed) 2011; 3: 428–44.Google Scholar

Dusick, AM, Poindexter, BB, Ehrenkranz, RA, Lemons, JA. Growth failure in the preterm infant: can we catch up? Semin Perinatol 2003; 27: 302–10.Google Scholar

References

Figueras, F, Cruz-Martinez, R, Sanz-Cortes, M, et al. Neurobehavioral outcomes in preterm, growth-restricted infants with and without prenatal advanced signs of brain-sparing. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 38: 288–94.Google Scholar

Levine, TA, Grunau, RE, McAuliffe, FM, et al. Early childhood neurodevelopment after intrauterine growth restriction: a systematic review. Pediatrics 2015; 135: 126–41.Google Scholar

Murray, E, Fernandes, M, Fazel, M, et al. Differential effect of intrauterine growth restriction on childhood neurodevelopment: a systematic review. BJOG 2015; 122: 1062–72.Google Scholar

Johnson, S, Evans, TA, Draper, ES, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcomes following late and moderate prematurity: a population-based cohort study. Arch Dis Childhood Fetal Neonatal Ed 2015; 100: F301–8.Google Scholar

Serenius, F, Kallen, K, Blennow, M, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome in extremely preterm infants at 2.5 years after active perinatal care in Sweden. JAMA 2013; 309: 1810–20.Google Scholar

Wu, YW, Colford, JM Jr. Chorioamnionitis as a risk factor for cerebral palsy: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2000; 284: 1417–24.Google Scholar

Banach, R, Boskovic, R, Einarson, T, Koren, G. Long-term developmental outcome of children of women with epilepsy, unexposed or exposed prenatally to antiepileptic drugs: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Drug Safety 2010; 33: 73–9.Google Scholar

Vajda, FJ, Hitchcock, AA, Graham, J, et al. The teratogenic risk of antiepileptic drug polytherapy. Epilepsia 2010; 51: 805–10.Google Scholar

Bromley, R, Weston, J, Adab, N, et al. Treatment for epilepsy in pregnancy: neurodevelopmental outcomes in the child. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 10: CD010236.Google Scholar

Meador, KJ, Baker, GA, Browning, N, et al. Fetal antiepileptic drug exposure and cognitive outcomes at age 6 years (NEAD study): a prospective observational study. Lancet Neurol 2013; 12: 244–52.Google Scholar

Cohen, MJ, Meador, KJ, Browning, N, et al. Fetal antiepileptic drug exposure: adaptive and emotional/behavioral functioning at age 6 years. Epilepsy Behav 2013; 29: 308–15.Google Scholar

Marchenko, A, Etwel, F, Olutunfese, O, et al. Pregnancy outcome following prenatal exposure to triptan medications: a meta-analysis. Headache 2015; 55:490–501.Google Scholar

Stewart, DE. Clinical practice: depression during pregnancy. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 1605–11.Google Scholar

Mei-Dan, E, Ray, JG, Vigod, SN. Perinatal outcomes among women with bipolar disorder: a population-based cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212(367): e1–8.Google Scholar

Eriksen, HL, Kesmodel, US, Pedersen, LH, Mortensen, EL. No association between prenatal exposure to psychotropics and intelligence at age five. Acta Obstet Gynaecol Scand 2015; 94: 501–7.Google Scholar

Streissguth, AP, Aase, JM, Clarren, SK, et al. Fetal alcohol syndrome in adolescents and adults. JAMA 1991; 265: 1961–7.Google Scholar

Patra, J, Bakker, R, Irving, H, et al. Dose-response relationship between alcohol consumption before and during pregnancy and the risks of low birthweight, preterm birth and small for gestational age (SGA): a systematic review and meta-analyses. BJOG 2011; 118: 1411–21.Google Scholar

Falgreen Eriksen, HL, Kesmodel, US, et al. Effects of tobacco smoking in pregnancy on offspring intelligence at the age of 5. J Pregnancy 2012; 2012:945196.Google Scholar

Gilman, SE, Gardener, H, Buka, SL. Maternal smoking during pregnancy and children’s cognitive and physical development: a causal risk factor? Am J Epidemiol 2008; 168: 522–31.Google Scholar

Behnke, M, Smith, VC, Committee on Substance A, Committee on F, Newborn. Prenatal substance abuse: short- and long-term effects on the exposed fetus. Pediatrics 2013; 131:e1009–24.Google Scholar

Creasy, R, Resnik, R, Iams, J, et al. Creasy and Resnik’s Maternal-Fetal Medicine: Principles and Practice, 7th edn. New York: Elsevier Saunders, 2014.Google Scholar

Kronenberg, ME, Raz, S, Sander, CJ. Neurodevelopmental outcome in children born to mothers with hypertension in pregnancy: the significance of suboptimal intrauterine growth. Dev Med Child Neurol 2006; 48: 200–6.Google Scholar

Ehrenstein, V, Rothman, KJ, Pedersen, L, et al. Pregnancy-associated hypertensive disorders and adult cognitive function among Danish conscripts. Am J Epidemiol 2009; 170: 1025–31.Google Scholar

Walker, CK, Krakowiak, P, Baker, A, et al. Preeclampsia, placental insufficiency, and autism spectrum disorder or developmental delay. JAMA Pediatrics 2015; 169: 154–62.Google Scholar

Bortolus, R, Ricci, E, Chatenoud, L, Parazzini, F. Nifedipine administered in pregnancy: effect on the development of children at 18 months. BJOG 2000; 107: 792–4.Google Scholar

Chan, WS, Koren, G, Barrera, M, et al. Neurocognitive development of children following in-utero exposure to labetalol for maternal hypertension: a cohort study using a prospectively collected database. Hypertension in Pregnancy 2010; 29: 271–83.Google Scholar

Sawhney, H, Suri, V, Vasishta, K, et al. Pregnancy and congenital heart disease: maternal and fetal outcome. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 38: 266–71.Google Scholar

Kallen, B, Rydhstroem, H, Aberg, A. Asthma during pregnancy: a population based study. Eur J Epidemiol 2000; 16: 167–71.Google Scholar

Lyall, K, Ashwood, P, Van de Water, J, Hertz-Picciotto, I. Maternal immune-mediated conditions, autism spectrum disorders, and developmental delay. J Autism Dev Disord 2014; 44: 1546–55.Google Scholar

Patel, EM, Swamy, GK, Heine, RP, et al. Medical and obstetric complications among pregnant women with cystic fibrosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212(98):e1–9.Google Scholar

Morreale de Escobar, G, Obregon, MJ, Escobar del Rey, F. Role of thyroid hormone during early brain development. Eur J Endocrinol 2004; 151(Suppl. 3):U25–37.Google Scholar

Lavado-Autric, R, Auso, E, Garcia-Velasco, JV, et al. Early maternal hypothyroxinemia alters histogenesis and cerebral cortex cytoarchitecture of the progeny. J Clin Invest 2003; 111: 1073–82.Google Scholar

Gyamfi, C, Wapner, RJ, D’Alton, ME. Thyroid dysfunction in pregnancy: the basic science and clinical evidence surrounding the controversy in management. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113: 702–7.Google Scholar

Pharoah, PO, Buttfield, IH, Hetzel, BS. Neurological damage to the fetus resulting from severe iodine deficiency during pregnancy. Lancet 1971; 1: 308–10.Google Scholar

Haddow, JE, Palomaki, GE, Allan, WC, et al. Maternal thyroid deficiency during pregnancy and subsequent neuropsychological development of the child. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 549–55.Google Scholar

Schaefer-Graf, UM, Buchanan, TA, Xiang, A, et al. Patterns of congenital anomalies and relationship to initial maternal fasting glucose levels in pregnancies complicated by type 2 and gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182: 313–20.Google Scholar

Clausen, TD, Mortensen, EL, Schmidt, L, et al. Cognitive function in adult offspring of women with type 1 diabetes. Diabetic Med 2011; 28: 838–44.Google Scholar

Fraser, A, Almqvist, C, Larsson, H, et al. Maternal diabetes in pregnancy and offspring cognitive ability: sibling study with 723,775 men from 579,857 families. Diabetologia 2014; 57: 102–9.Google Scholar

Clausen, TD, Mortensen, EL, Schmidt, L, et al. Cognitive function in adult offspring of women with gestational diabetes–the role of glucose and other factors. PloS One 2013; 8: e67107.Google Scholar

Tam, EW, Haeusslein, LA, Bonifacio, SL, et al. Hypoglycemia is associated with increased risk for brain injury and adverse neurodevelopmental outcome in neonates at risk for encephalopathy. J Pediatr 2012; 161: 88–93.Google Scholar

American Academy of Pediatrics CoG. Maternal phenylketonuria. Pediatrics 2008; 122: 445–9.Google Scholar

Cetin, I, Corbetta, C, Sereni, LP, et al. Umbilical amino acid concentrations in normal and growth-retarded fetuses sampled in utero by cordocentesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 253–61.Google Scholar

Lenke, RR, Levy, HL. Maternal phenylketonuria and hyperphenylalaninemia: an international survey of the outcome of untreated and treated pregnancies. N Engl J Med 1980; 303: 1202–8.Google Scholar

Rouse, B, Azen, C, Koch, R, et al. Maternal Phenylketonuria Collaborative Study (MPKUCS) offspring: facial anomalies, malformations, and early neurological sequelae. Am J Med Genet 1997; 69:89–95.Google Scholar

Pacheco, LD, Berkowitz, RL, Moise, KJ Jr, et al. Fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: a management algorithm based on risk stratification. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 118: 1157–63.Google Scholar

Pearson, HA, Shulman, NR, Marder, VJ, Cone, TE Jr. Isoimmune neonatal thrombocytopenic purpura: clinical and therapeutic considerations. Blood 1964; 23: 154–77.Google Scholar

Tiller, H, Kamphuis, MM, Flodmark, O, et al. Fetal intracranial haemorrhages caused by fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: an observational cohort study of 43 cases from an international multicentre registry. BMJ Open 2013; 3.Google Scholar

Weisz, B, Rosenbaum, O, Chayen, B, et al. Outcome of severely anaemic fetuses treated by intrauterine transfusions. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2009; 94: F201–4.Google Scholar

Copel, JA, Bahtiyar, MO. A practical approach to fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123: 1057–69.Google Scholar

Tong, M, Viall, CA, Chamley, LW. Antiphospholipid antibodies and the placenta: a systematic review of their in vitro effects and modulation by treatment. Hum Reprod Update 2015; 21: 97–118.Google Scholar

Smyth, A, Oliveira, GH, Lahr, BD, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of pregnancy outcomes in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2010; 5: 2060–8.Google Scholar

Ostensen, M, Clowse, M. Pathogenesis of pregnancy complications in systemic lupus erythematosus. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2013; 25: 591–6.Google Scholar

Friedman, DM, Kim, MY, Copel, JA, et al. Prospective evaluation of fetuses with autoimmune-associated congenital heart block followed in the PR Interval and Dexamethasone Evaluation (PRIDE) study. Am J Cardiol 2009; 103: 1102–6.Google Scholar

Hirvikoski, T, Nordenstrom, A, Lindholm, T, et al. Cognitive functions in children at risk for congenital adrenal hyperplasia treated prenatally with dexamethasone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007; 92: 542–8.Google Scholar

Khandaker, GM, Zimbron, J, Lewis, G, Jones, PB. Prenatal maternal infection, neurodevelopment and adult schizophrenia: a systematic review of population-based studies. Psychol Med 2013; 43: 239–57.Google Scholar

Atladottir, HO, Henriksen, TB, Schendel, DE, Parner, ET. Autism after infection, febrile episodes, and antibiotic use during pregnancy: an exploratory study. Pediatrics 2012; 130: e1447–54.Google Scholar

Zerbo, O, Iosif, AM, Walker, C, et al. Is maternal influenza or fever during pregnancy associated with autism or developmental delays? Results from the CHARGE (CHildhood Autism Risks from Genetics and Environment) study. J Autism Dev Disord 2013; 43:25–33.Google Scholar

Roizen, N, Swisher, CN, Stein, MA, et al. Neurologic and developmental outcome in treated congenital toxoplasmosis. Pediatrics 1995; 95:11–20.Google Scholar

Demmler, GJ, Infectious Diseases Society of America and Centers for Disease Control. Summary of a workshop on surveillance for congenital cytomegalovirus disease. Rev Infect Dis 1991; 13: 315–29.Google Scholar

Foulon, I, Naessens, A, Foulon, W, et al. A 10-year prospective study of sensorineural hearing loss in children with congenital cytomegalovirus infection. J Pediatr 2008; 153: 84–8.Google Scholar

Lanari, M, Lazzarotto, T, Venturi, V, et al. Neonatal cytomegalovirus blood load and risk of sequelae in symptomatic and asymptomatic congenitally infected newborns. Pediatrics 2006; 117: e76–83.Google Scholar

Fowler, KB, Stagno, S, Pass, RF, et al. The outcome of congenital cytomegalovirus infection in relation to maternal antibody status. N Engl J Med 1992; 326: 663–7.Google Scholar

Sauerbrei, A, Wutzler, P. The congenital varicella syndrome. J Perinatol 2000; 20: 548–54.Google Scholar

Chau, V, McFadden, DE, Poskitt, KJ, Miller, SP. Chorioamnionitis in the pathogenesis of brain injury in preterm infants. Clin Perinatol 2014; 41: 83–103.Google Scholar

Meeraus, WH, Petersen, I, Gilbert, R. Association between antibiotic prescribing in pregnancy and cerebral palsy or epilepsy in children born at term: a cohort study using the health improvement network. PloS One 2015; 10: e0122034.Google Scholar

Manuck, TA, Varner, MW. Neonatal and early childhood outcomes following early vs later preterm premature rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211(308): e1–6.Google Scholar

References

Reddy, UM, Abuhamad, AZ, Levine, D, Saade, GR; Fetal Imaging Workshop Invited Participants. Fetal imaging: executive summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for MaternalFetal Medicine, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of Radiology, Society for Pediatric Radiology, and Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Fetal Imaging workshop. J Ultrasound Med 2014; 33: 745–57.Google Scholar

Iyasu, S, Saftlas, AK, Rowley, DL, et al. The epidemiology of placenta previa in the United States, 1979 through 1987. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 168: 1424–9.Google Scholar

Cresswell, JA, Ronsmans, C, Calvert, C, Filippi, V. Prevalence of placenta praevia by world region: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Trop Med Int Health 2013; 18: 712–24.Google Scholar

Clark, SL, Koonings, PP, Phelan, JP. Placenta previa/accreta and prior cesarean sections. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 66:89–92.Google Scholar

Ananth, CV, Smulian, JC, Vintzileos, AM. The association of placenta previa with history of cesarean delivery and abortion: a metaanlysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 1071–8.Google Scholar

Babinszki, A, Kerenyi, T, Torok, O, et al. Perinatal outcome in grand and great grand multiparity: effects of parity on obstetric risk factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181: 669–74.Google Scholar

Ananth, CV, Smulian, JC, Vintzileos, AM. The association of placenta previa with history of cesarean delivery and abortion: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 1071–8.Google Scholar

Williams, MA, Mittendorf, R, Lieberman, E, et al. Cigarette smoking during pregnancy in relation to placenta previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165:28–32.Google Scholar

Handler, AS, Mason, ED, Rosenberg, DL, et al. The relationship between exposure during pregnancy to cigarette smoking and cocaine use and placenta previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170: 884–9.Google Scholar

Schachter, M, Torbin, Y, Arieli, S, et al. In vitro fertilization is a risk factor for vasa previa. Fertil Steril 2002; 78: 642–3.Google Scholar

Love, CD, Wallace, EM. Pregnancies complicated by placenta previa: what is appropriate management? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996; 103: 864–7.Google Scholar

Farine, D, Fox, HE, Jakobson, S, et al. Is it really a placenta previa? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1989; 31: 103–8.Google Scholar

Smith, RS, Lauria, MR, Comstock, CH, et al. Transvaginal ultrasonography for all placentas that appear to be low lying or over the internal cervical os. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997; 9: 22–4.Google Scholar

Hertzberg, BS, Bowie, JD, Carroll, BA, et al. Diagnosis of placenta previa during the third trimester: role of transperineal sonography. AJR Am J Roetgenol 1992; 159: 83–7.Google Scholar

Dawson, WB, Dumas, MD, Romano, WM, et al. Translabial ultrasonography and placenta previa: does measurement of the os-placenta distance predict outcome? Ultrasound Med 1996; 15: 441–6.Google Scholar

McShane, PM, Heyl, PS, Epstein, MF. Maternal and perinatal morbidity resulting from placenta previa. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 65: 176–82.Google Scholar

Cotton, DB, Read, JA, Paul, RH, et al. The conservative aggressive management of placenta previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980; 137: 687–95.Google Scholar

Besinger, RE, Moniak, CW, Paskiweicz, LS, et al. The effect of tocolytic use in the management of symptomatic placenta previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172: 1770–5.Google Scholar

Chamberlain, G, Steer, P. ABC of labour care: obstetric emergencies. BMJ 1999; 318: 1342–5.Google Scholar

D’Angelo, LJ, Irwin, LF. Conservation management of placenta previa: a cost-benefit analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 149: 320–6.Google Scholar

Wing, DA, Paul, RH, Millar, LK. Management of the symptomatic placenta previa: a randomized, controlled trial of inpatient versus outpatient expectant management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 175: 806–11.Google Scholar

Brar, HS, Platt, LD, De Vore, GR, et al. Fetal umbilical velocimetry for the surveillance of pregnancies complicated by placenta previa. Reprod Med 1988; 33: 741–4.Google Scholar

Wolf, EJ, Mallozi, A, Rodis, JF, et al. Placenta previa is not an independent risk factor for a small for gestational age infant. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 77: 707–9.Google Scholar

Ananth, CV, Demisse, K, Smulian, JC, Vintzileos, AM. Placenta previa in singleton and twin births in the United States, 1989 through 1998: a comparison of risk factor profiles and associated conditions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188: 275–81.Google Scholar

Ananth, CV, Smulian, JC, Vintzileos, AM. The effect of placenta previa on neonatal mortality: a population-based study in the United States, 1989 through 1997. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188: 1299–304.Google Scholar

Crane, JM, van den Hof, MC, Dodds, L, et al. Neonatal outcomes with placenta previa. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 93: 541–4.Google Scholar

Kåregård, M, Gennser, G. Incidence and recurrence rate of abruptio placentae in Sweden. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 67: 523–8.Google Scholar

Ananth, CV, Smulian, JC, Vintzileos, AM. Incidence of placental abruption in relation to cigarette smoking and hypertensive disorders during pregnancy: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 93: 622–8.Google Scholar

Ananth, CV, Wilcox, AJ. Placental abruption and perinatal mortality in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 2001; 153: 332–7.Google Scholar

Abdella, TN, Sibai, BM, Hays, JM, et al. Perinatal outcome in abruptio placentae. Obstet Gynecol 1984; 63: 365–70.Google Scholar

Pritchard, JA, Cunningham, FG, Pritchard, SA, et al. On reducing the frequency of severe abruptio placentae. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 1345–51.Google Scholar

Kramer, MS, Usher, RH, Pollack, R, et al. Etiologic determinants of abruptio placentae. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89: 221–6.Google Scholar

Krohn, M, Voig, L, McKnight, B, et al. Correlates of placental abruption. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1987; 94: 333–40.Google Scholar

Toohey, JS, Keegan, KA, Morgan, MA, et al. The “dangerous multipara”: fact or fiction? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172: 683–6.Google Scholar

Ananth, CV, Savitz, DA, Williams, MA. Placental abruption and its association with hypertension and prolonged rupture of membranes: a methodologic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 88: 309–18.Google Scholar

Ananth, CV, Savitz, DA, Bowes, WA, et al. Influence of hypertensive disorders and cigarette smoking on placental abruption and uterine bleeding during pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 572–8.Google Scholar

Sibai, BM, Lindheimer, M, Hauth, J, et al. Risk factors for preeclampsia, abruptio placentae and adverse neonatal outcomes among women with chronic hypertension. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development network of maternal–fetal medicine units. N Engl J Med 1998; 339: 667–71.Google Scholar

Ananth, CV, Berkowitz, GS, Savitz, DA, et al. Placental abruption and adverse perinatal outcomes. JAMA 1999; 282: 1646–51.Google Scholar

Misra, DP, Ananth, CV. Risk factor profiles of placental abruption in first and second pregnancies: heterogeneous etiologies. J Clin Epidemiol 1999; 52: 453–61.Google Scholar

Gonen, R, Hannah, ME, Milligan, JE. Does prolonged premature rupture of the membranes predispose to abruptio placentae? Obstet Gynecol 1989; 74: 347–50.Google Scholar

Major, CA, de Veciana, M, Lewis, DF, et al. Preterm premature rupture of membranes and abruptio placentae: is there an association between these pregnancy complications? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172: 672–6.Google Scholar

Bingol, N, Fuchs, M, Diaz, V, et al. Teratogenicity of cocaine in humans. J Pediatr 1987; 110: 93–6.Google Scholar

Hoskins, IA, Friedman, DM, Frieden, FJ, et al. Relationship between antepartum cocaine abuse, abnormal umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry, and placental abruption. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 78: 279–82.Google Scholar

Slutsker, L. Risks associated with cocaine use during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 79: 778–89.Google Scholar

Kupferminc, MJ, Eldor, A, Steinman, N, et al. Increased frequency of genetic thrombophilia in women with complications of pregnancy. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 50–2.Google Scholar

Gherman, RB, Goodwin, TM. Obstetric implications of activated protein C resistance and factor V Leiden mutation. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2000; 55: 117–22.Google Scholar

Kettel, LM, Branch, DW, Scott, JR. Occult placental abruption after maternal trauma. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 71: 449–53.Google Scholar

Stafford, PA, Biddinger, PW, Zumwalt, RE. Lethal intrauterine fetal trauma. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 159: 485–9.Google Scholar

Rice, JP, Kay, HH, Mahony, BS. The clinical significance of uterine leiomyomas in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 160: 1212–16.Google Scholar

Nimrod, CA, Oppenheimer, LW. Medicine of the Fetus and Mother, 2nd edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1999: 1498–501.Google Scholar

Hurd, WW, Miodovnik, M, Hertzberg, V, et al. Selective management of abruptio placentae: a prospective study. Obstet Gynecol 1983; 61: 467–73.Google Scholar

Combs, CA, Nyberg, DA, Mack, LA, et al. Expectant management after sonographic diagnosis of placental abruption. Am J Perinatol 1992; 9: 170–4.Google Scholar

Towers, CV, Pircon, RA, Heppard, M. Is tocolysis safe in the management of third trimester bleeding? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 180: 1572–8.Google Scholar

Grunfeld, JP, Pertuiset, N. Acute renal failure in pregnancy: 1987. Am J Kidney Dis 1987; 9: 359–62.Google Scholar

Shaw, KJ. Abruptio placentae. In Mishell, DR, Brenner, DR, eds., Management of Common Problems in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 3rd edn. Boston: Blackwell, 1994: 211–15.Google Scholar

Spinillo, A, Fazzi, E, Stronati, I, et al. Early morbidity and neurodevelopmental outcome in low birth weight infants born after third trimester bleeding. Am J Perinatol 1994; 11:85–90.Google Scholar

Oyelese, Y, Catanzarite, V, Prefumo, F, et al. Vasa previa: the impact of prenatal diagnosis on outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103: 937–42.Google Scholar

Englert, Y, Imbert, MC, Van Rosendael, E, et al. Morphological anomalies in the placentae of IVF pregnancies: preliminary report of a multicentric study. Hum Reprod 1987; 2: 155–7.Google Scholar

Burton, G, Saunders, DM. Vasa praevia: another cause of concern in in vitro fertilization pregnancies. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 1988; 28: 180–1.Google Scholar

Oyelese, KO, Schwarzler, P, Coates, S, et al. A strategy for reducing the mortality rate from vasa previa using transvaginal sonography with color Doppler. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998; 12: 377–9.Google Scholar

Carp, HJ, Mashiach, S, Serr, DM. Vasa previa: a major complication and its management. Obstet Gynecol 1979; 53: 273–5.Google Scholar

Cordero, DR, Helfgoftt, AW, Landy, HJ, et al. A non-hemorrhagic manifestation of vasa previa: a clinico-pathologic case report. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 82:698–700.Google Scholar

Antoine, C, Young, BK, Silverma, F, et al. Sinusoidal fetal heart rate pattern with vasa previa in twin pregnancy. J Reprod Med 1982; 27: 295–300.Google Scholar

Oyelese, KO, Turner, M, Lees, C, et al. Vasa previa: an avoidable obstetric tragedy. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1999; 54: 138–45.Google Scholar

Harding, JA, Lewis, DF, Major, CA, et al. Color flow Doppler: a useful instrument in the diagnosis of vasa previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163: 1566–8.Google Scholar

Meyer, WJ, Blumenthal, L, Cadkin, A, et al. Vasa previa: prenatal diagnosis with transvaginal color Doppler flow imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169: 1627–9.Google Scholar

Hata, K, Hata, T, Fujiwaki, R, et al. An accurate antenatal diagnosis of vasa previa with transvaginal color Doppler ultrasonography. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171: 265–7.Google Scholar

Clerici, G, Burnelli, L, Lauro, V, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of vasa previa presenting as amniotic band: “a not so innocent amniotic band.” Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 7: 61–3.Google Scholar

Lee, W, Kirk, JS, Comstock, CH, et al. Vasa previa: prenatal detection by three-dimensional ultrasonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 16: 384–7.Google Scholar

Oyelese, Y, Chavez, MR, Yeo, I, et al. Three-dimensional sonographic diagnosis of vasa previa. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 24: 211–5.Google Scholar

Robinson, BK, Grobman, WA. Effectiveness of timing strategies for delivery of individuals with vasa previa. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117: 542–9.Google Scholar

Schellpfeffer, MA. Improved neonatal outcome of vasa previa with aggressive intrapartum management: a report of two cases. J Reprod Med 1995; 40: 327–32.Google Scholar

Publications Committee, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203: 430–9.Google Scholar

Gyamfi-Bannerman, C, Gilbert, S, Landon, MB, et al. Risk of uterine rupture and placenta accreta with prior uterine surgery outside of the lower segment. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120: 1332–7.Google Scholar

Norwitz, ER, Stern, HM, Grier, H, Lee-Parritz, A. Placenta percreta and uterine rupture associated with prior whole body radiation therapy. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 98: 929–31.Google Scholar

Hare, AA, Olah, KS. Pregnancy following endometrial ablation: a review article. J Obstet Gynaecol 2005; 25: 108–14.Google Scholar

Wu, S, Kocherginsky, M, Hibbard, JU. Abnormal placentation: twenty-year analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192: 1458–61.Google Scholar

Wax, JR, Seiler, A, Horowitz, S, Ingardia, CJ. Interpregnancy interval as a risk factor for placenta accreta. Conn Med 2000; 64: 659–61.Google Scholar

Esh-Broder, E, Ariel, I, Abas-Bashir, N, et al. Placenta accreta is associated with IVF pregnancies: a retrospective chart review. BJOG 2011; 118: 1084–9.Google Scholar

Silver, RM, Landon, MB, Rouse, DJ, et al. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 1226–32.Google Scholar

Berkley, EM, Abuhamad, AZ. Prenatal diagnosis of placenta accrete: is sonography all we need? J Ultrasound Med 2013; 32: 1345–50.Google Scholar

Comstock, CH, Bronsteen, RA. The antenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta. BJOG 2014; 121: 171–81.Google Scholar

D’Antonio, F, Iacovella, C, Palacios-Jarquemada, J, et al. Prenatal identification of invasive placentation using magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 44: 8–16Google Scholar

Silver, RM, Fox, KA, Barton, JR, et al. Center of excellence for placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212: 561–8.Google Scholar

Robinson, BK, Grobman, WA. Effectiveness of timing strategies for delivery of individuals with placenta previa and accreta. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116: 835–42.Google Scholar

Sentilhes, L, Ambroselli, C, Kayem, G, et al. Maternal outcome after conservative management of placenta accreta. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 115: 526–34.Google Scholar

Riggs, JC, Jahshan, A, Schiavello, HJ. Alternative conservative management of placenta accreta: a case report. J Reprod Med 2000; 45: 595–8.Google Scholar

Grobman, WA, Gersnoviez, R, Landon, MB, et al. Pregnancy outcomes for women with placenta previa in relation to the number of prior cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110: 1249–55.Google Scholar

Naeye, RL. Umbilical cord length: clinical significance. J Pediatr 1985; 107: 278–81.Google Scholar

Krakowiak, P, Smith, EN, de Bruyn, G, et al. Risk factors and outcomes associated with a short umbilical cord. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103: 119–27.Google Scholar

Rolschau, J. The relationship between some disorders of the umbilical cord and intrauterine growth retardation. Acta Obstet Gynaecol Scand Suppl 1978; 72:15–21.Google Scholar

Liu, CC, Pretorious, DH, Scioscia, AL, et al. Sonographic prenatal diagnosis of marginal placental cord insertion: clinical importance. J Ultrasound Med 2002; 21: 627–32.Google Scholar

Heinonen, S, Ryynaenen, M, Kirkinen, P, et al. Perinatal diagnostic evaluation of velamentous and umbilical cord insertion: clinical, Doppler, and ultrasonic findings. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 87: 112–17.Google Scholar

Hasegawa, J, Matsuoka, R, Ichizuka, K, et al. Velamentous cord insertion into the lower third of the uterus is associated with intrapartum fetal heart rate abnormalities. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 425–9.Google Scholar

References

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. 2013 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Summary of National Findings (NSDUH Series H-48, HHS Publication No. [SMA] 14–4863). Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2014.Google Scholar

Tan, CH, Denny, CH, Cheal, NE, et al. Alcohol use and binge drinking among women of childbearing age – United States, 2011–2013. MMWR 2015; 64(37): 1042–6.Google Scholar

Kelly, RH, Zatzick, DF, Anders, TF. The detection and treatment of psychiatric disorders and substance use among pregnant women cared for in obstetrics. Am J Psychiatry 2014; 158(2): 213–9.Google Scholar

Briggs, GG, Freeman, RK,Yaffe, SJ. Introduction. In Drugs in Pregnancy and Lactation, 9th edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2011: xv–xxii.Google Scholar

Kraemer, K. Placental transfer of drugs. Neonatal Netw 1997; 16: 65–7.Google Scholar

Mahone, PR, Scott, K, Sleggs, G, et al. Cocaine and metabolites in amniotic fluid may prolong fetal drug exposure. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171: 465–9.Google Scholar

Brent, RL. Environmental causes of human congenital malformations: the pediatrician’s role in dealing with these complex clinical problems caused by a multiplicity of environmental and genetic factors. Pediatrics 2004; 113: 957–68.Google Scholar

Konijnenberg, C. Methodological issues in assessing the impact of prenatal drug exposure. Substance Abuse Res Treat 2015; 9(S2): 39–44.Google Scholar

Snodgrass, SR. Cocaine babies: a result of multiple teratogenic influences. J Child Neurol 1994; 9: 227–33.Google Scholar

Lemoine, P, Harousseau, H, Borteyru, JP, et al. Les enfants des parents alcoholiques: anomolies observees a propos de 127 cas (The children of alcoholic parents: anomalies observed in 127 cases). Quest Med 1968; 25: 476–82.Google Scholar

Jones, KL, Smith, DW, Ulleland, CN, Streissguth, AP. Pattern of malformation in offspring of chronic alcoholic mothers. Lancet 1973; 301(7815): 1267–71.Google Scholar

Stratton, K, Howe, C, Battaglia, F, eds. Institute of Medicine Fetal Alcohol Syndrome: Diagnosis, Epidemiology, Prevention, and Treatment. Washington: National Academy Press; 1996.Google Scholar

May, PA, Keaster, C, Bozeman, R, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of fetal alcohol syndrome and partial fetal alcohol syndrome in a Rocky Mountain region city. Drug Alcohol Depend 2015; 155: 118–27.Google Scholar

May, PA, Baete, A, Russo, J, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. Pediatrics 2014; 134(5): 855–66.Google Scholar

May, PA, Blankenship, J, Marais, AS, et al. Approaching the prevalence of the full spectrum of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders in a South African population-based study. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2013; 37(5): 818–30.Google Scholar

Centre for Addiction and Mental Health C. Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders: how widespread are they in Canada? Available at: www.camh.ca/en/hospital/about_camh/newsroom/news_releases_media_advisories_and_backgrounders/current_year/Pages/Fetal-Alcohol-Spectrum-Disorders-How-Widespread-Are-They-in-Canada.aspx (accessed March 29, 2016).Google Scholar

Abel, EL, Sokol, RJ. A revised conservative estimate of the incidence of FAS and its economic impact. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1991; 15(3): 514–24.Google Scholar

Harwood, H. Updating Estimates of the Economic Costs of Alcohol Abuse in the United States: Estimates, Updated Methods and Data. Report Prepared by the Lewin Group. Bethesda, MD:National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 2000.Google Scholar

Stade, BC, Ali, A, Bennett, D, et al. The burden of prenatal exposure to alcohol: revised measurement of cost. J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol 2009; 16: e91–102.Google Scholar

Williams, JF, Smith, VC; Committee on Substance Abuse. Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. Pediatrics 2015; 136(5): e1395–406.Google Scholar

Hoyme, HE, May, PA, Kalberg, WO, et al. A practical clinical approach to diagnosis of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders: clarification of the 1996 institute of medicine criteria. Pediatrics 2005; 115: 39–47.Google Scholar

Astley, SJ, Clarren, SK. Diagnosing the full spectrum of fetal alcohol-exposed individuals: introducing the 4-digit diagnostic code. Alcohol Alcohol 2000; 35: 400–10.Google Scholar

World Health Organization. The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioral Disorders: Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines. Geneva: WHO, 1992.Google Scholar

American Psychiatric Association. A Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edn. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing, 2013: 798–801.Google Scholar

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders: Guidelines for Referral and Diagnosis. Atlanta:CDC, 2004.Google Scholar

Chudley, AE, Conry, J, Cook, JL, et al. Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder: Canadian guidelines for diagnosis. CMAJ 2005; 172: S1–21.Google Scholar

Cook, JL, Green, CR, Lilley, CM, et al. Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder: a guideline for diagnosis across the lifespan. CMAJ 2015; 188(3): 191–7.Google Scholar

Hoyme, HE, Kalberg, WO, Elliott, AJ, et al. Updated clinical guidelines for diagnosing fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. Pediatrics 2016; 138(2):pii: e20154256.Google Scholar

Swayze, VW, Johnson, VP, Hanson, JW, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of brain anomalies in fetal alcohol syndrome. Pediatrics 1997; 99: 232–40.Google Scholar

Mattson, SN, Schoenfeld, AM, Riley, EP. Teratogenic effects of alcohol on brain and behavior. Alcohol Res Health 2001; 25(3): 185–91.Google Scholar

Spadoni, AD, McGee, CL, Fryer, SL, Riley, EP. Neuroimaging and fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2007; 31(2): 239–45.Google Scholar

Jacobson, JL, Jacobson, SW, Sokol, RJ, et al. Effects of alcohol use, smoking and illicit drug use on fetal growth in black infants. J Pediatr 1994; 124: 757–64.Google Scholar

Charness, ME, Safran, RM, Perides, G. Ethanol inhibits neural cell-cell adhesion. J Biol Chem 1994; 269: 9304–9.Google Scholar

DeJonge, MH, Zachman, RD. The effect of maternal ethanol ingestion on fetal rat heart vitamin A: a model for fetal alcohol syndrome. Pediatr Res 1995; 37: 418–23.Google Scholar

Naus, CCG, Bechberger, JF. Effect of prenatal ethanol exposure on postnatal neural gene expression in the rat. Dev Genet 1991; 12: 293–8.Google Scholar

Miller, MW. Prenatal exposure to ethanol delays the schedule and rate of migration of neurons to rat somatosensory cortex. In Fifth Congress of the International Society for Biomedical Research on Alcoholism (ISBRA). Denver: ISBRA, 1990.Google Scholar

Holzman, C, Paneth, N, Little, R, et al. Perinatal brain injury in premature infants born to mothers using alcohol in pregnancy. Pediatrics 1995; 95: 66–73.Google Scholar

Armant, DR, Saunders, DE. Exposure of embryonic cells to alcohol: contrasting effects during preimplantation and postimplantation development. Semin Perinatol 1996; 20: 127–39.Google Scholar

Ahlgren, SC, Thakur, V, Bronner-Fraser, M. Sonic hedgehog rescues cranial neural crest from cell death induced by ethanol exposure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99: 10476–81.Google Scholar

Peng, Y, Yang, PH, Ng, SSM, et al. A critical role of Pax6 in alcohol induced fetal microcephaly. Neurobiol Dis 2004; 16: 370–6.Google Scholar

Chrisman, K, Kenney, R, Comin, J, et al. Gestational ethanol exposure disrupts the expression of Fgf8 and Sonic hedgehog during limb patterning. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2004; 70: 163–71.Google Scholar

Veazey, KJ, Parnell, SE, Miranda, RC, Golding, MC. Dose-dependent alcohol-induced alterations in chromatin structure persist beyond the window of exposure and correlate with fetal alcohol syndrome birth defects. Epigenet Chromatin 2015; 8: 39.Google Scholar

Kleiber, ML, Diehl, EJ, Laufer, BI, et al. Long-term genomic and epigenomic dysregulation as a consequence of prenatal alcohol exposure: a model for fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. Front Genet 2014; 5: 161.Google Scholar

Mead, EA, Sarkar, DK. Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders and their transmission through genetic and epigenetic mechanisms. Front Genet 2014; 5: 154.Google Scholar

Druse, MJ, Kuo, A, Tajuddin, N. Effects of in utero ethanol exposure on the developing serotonergic system. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1991; 15: 678–84.Google Scholar

Pinazo-Duran, MD, Renau-Piqueras, J, Guerri, C. Developmental changes in the optic nerve related to ethanol consumption in pregnant rats: analysis of the ethanol-exposed optic nerve. Teratology 1993; 48: 305–22.Google Scholar

Church, MW, Gerkin, KP. Hearing disorders in children with fetal alcohol syndrome: findings from case reports. Pediatrics 1988; 82: 147–54.Google Scholar

Syslak, PH, Nathaniel, EJH, Novak, C, et al. Fetal alcohol effects on the postnatal development of the rat myocardium:an ultrastructural and morphometric analysis. Exp Mol Pathol 1994; 60: 158–72.Google Scholar

Gage, JC, Sulik, KK. Pathogenesis of ethanol-induced hydronephrosis and hydroureter as demonstrated following in vivo exposure of mouse embryos. Teratology 1991; 44: 299–312.Google Scholar

Autti-Rämö, I, Fagerlund, A, Ervalahti, N, et al. Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders in Finland: clinical delineation of 77 older children and adolescents. Am J Med Genet A 2006; 140: 137–43.Google Scholar

Day, NL, Richardson, G, Robles, N, et al. Effect of prenatal alcohol exposure on growth and morphology of offspring at 8 months of age. Pediatrics 1990; 85: 748–52.Google Scholar

Breese, CR, D’Costa, A, Ingram, RL, et al. Long-term suppression of insulin-like growth factor-1 in rats after in utero ethanol exposure:relationship to somatic growth. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1993; 264: 448–57.Google Scholar

Mauceri, HJ, Lee, W, Conway, S. Effect of ethanol on insulin-like growth factor-II release from fetal organs. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1994; 18: 35–41.Google Scholar

Guo, W, Gregg, JP, Fonkalsrud, EW. Effect of maternal ethanol intake on fetal rabbit gastrointestinal development. J Pediatr Surg 1994; 29: 1030–4.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Breastfeeding: Maternal and Infant Aspects (Educational Bulletin Number 258). Washington, DC: ACOG, 2000.Google Scholar

Little, RE, Anderson, KW, Ervin, CH, et al. Maternal alcohol use during breast-feeding and infant mental and motor development at one year. N Engl J Med 1989; 321: 425–30.Google Scholar

Graham, JM, Hanson, JW, Darby, BL, et al. Independent dysmorphology evaluations at birth and 4 years of age for children exposed to varying amounts of alcohol in utero. Pediatrics 1988; 81: 772–8.Google Scholar

Streissguth, AP. The behavioral teratology of alcohol: performance, behavioral, and intellectual deficits in prenatally exposed children. In West, JR, ed., Alcohol and Brain Development. New York:Oxford University Press, 1986: 3–44.Google Scholar

Streissguth, AP, Aase, JM, Clarren, SK, et al. Fetal alcohol syndrome in adolescents and adults. JAMA 1991; 265: 1961–7.Google Scholar

Kirkland, SA, Dodds, LA, Brosky, G. The natural history of smoking during pregnancy among women in Nova Scotia. CMAJ 2000; 163: 281–2.Google Scholar

Tong, VT, England, LJ, Dietz, PM, Asare, LA. Smoking patterns and use of cessation interventions during pregnancy. Am J Prevent Med 2008; 35: 327–33.Google Scholar

Tong, VT, Jones, JR, Dietz, PM, et al. Trends in smoking before, during, and after pregnancy: pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system (PRAMS), United States, 31 Sites, 2000–2005. MMWR Surveill Summ 2009; 58: 1–29.Google Scholar

Lee, LJ, Lupo, PJ. Maternal smoking during pregnancy and the risk of congenital heart defects in offspring: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Pediatr Cardiol 2013; 34: 398–407.Google Scholar

Secker-Walker, RH, Vacek, PM, Flynn, BS, et al. Smoking in pregnancy, exhaled carbon monoxide, and birth weight. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89: 648–53.Google Scholar

Visnjevac, V, Mikov, M. Smoking and carboxyhemoglobin concentrations in mothers and their newborn infants. Toxicology 1986; 5: 175–7.Google Scholar

Jazayeri, A, Tsibris, JCM, Spellacy, WN. Umbilical cord plasma erythropoietin levels in pregnancies complicated by maternal smoking. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 178: 433–5.Google Scholar

Jordanov, JS. Cotinine concentrations in amniotic fluid and urine of smoking, passive smoking and non-smoking pregnant women at term and in the urine of their neonates on the 1st day of life. Eur J Pediatr 1990; 149: 734–7.Google Scholar

Bernstein, IM, Plocienik, K, Stahle, S, et al. Impact of maternal cigarette smoking on fetal growth and body composition. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183: 883–6.Google Scholar

Law, KL, Stroud, LR, LaGasse, LL, et al. Smoking during pregnancy and newborn neurobehavior. Pediatrics 2003; 111: 1318–23.Google Scholar

Bardy, AH, Seppälä, T, Lillsunde, P, et al. Objectively measured tobacco exposure during pregnancy: neonatal effects and relation to maternal smoking. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993; 100: 721–6.Google Scholar

Bernstein, IM, Mongeon, JA, Badger, GJ, et al. Maternal smoking and its association with birth weight. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106: 986–91.Google Scholar

Cliver, SP, Goldenberg, RL, Cutter, GR, et al. The effect of cigarette smoking on neonatal anthropometric measurements. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 85: 625–30.Google Scholar

Hermann, M, King, K, Weitzman, M. Prenatal tobacco smoke and postnatal secondhand smoke exposure and child neurodevelopment. Curr Opin Pediatr 2008; 20: 184–90.Google Scholar

Bada, HS, Das, A, Bauer, CR, et al. Low birth weight and preterm births: etiologic fraction attributable to prenatal drug exposure. J Perinatol 2005; 25: 631–7.Google Scholar

Resnik, R, Brink, GW, Wilkes, M. Catecholamine-mediated reduction in uterine blood flow after nicotine infusion in the pregnant ewe. J Clin Invest 1979; 63: 1133–6.Google Scholar

Burton, GJ, Palmer, ME, Dalton, KJ. Morphometric differences between the placental vasculature of non-smokers, smokers and ex-smokers. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989; 96: 907–15.Google Scholar

Larsen, LG, Clausen, HV, Jonsson, L. Stereologic examination of placentas from mothers who smoke during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: 531–7.Google Scholar

Gabrial, R, Alsat, E, Evain-Brion, D. Alteration of epidermal growth factor receptor in placental membranes of smokers: relationship with intrauterine growth retardation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170: 1238–43.Google Scholar

Slotkin, TA, McCook, EC, Lappi, SE, et al. Altered development of basal and forskolin-stimulated adenylate cyclase activity in brain regions of rats exposed to nicotine prenatally. Dev Brain Res 1992; 68: 233–9.Google Scholar

Khoury, MJ, Gomez-Frias, M, Mulinare, J. Does maternal cigarette smoking during pregnancy cause cleft lip and palate in offspring? Am J Dis Child 1989; 143: 333–7.Google Scholar

Sullivan, PM, Dervan, LA, Reiger, S, et al. Risk of congenital heart defects in the offspring of smoking mothers: a population-based study. J Pediatr 2015; 166: 978–84.Google Scholar

Hacksaw, A, Rodeck, C, Boniface, S. Maternal smoking in pregnancy and birth defects: a systematic review based on 173 687 malformed cases and 11.7 million controls. Hum Reprod Update 2011; 17: 589–604.Google Scholar

Ananth, CV, Savitz, DA, Luther, ER. Maternal cigarette smoking as a risk factor for placental abruption, placenta previa, and uterine bleeding in pregnancy. Am J Epidemiol 1996; 144: 881–9.Google Scholar

Castles, A, Adams, K, Melvin, CL, et al. Effects of smoking during pregnancy: five meta-analyses. Am J Prevent Med 1999; 16: 208–15.Google Scholar

Naeye, RL. Abruptio placentae and placenta previa: frequency, perinatal mortality, and cigarette smoking. Obstet Gynecol 1980; 55: 701–4.Google Scholar

Ananth, CV, Getahun, D, Peltier, MR, et al. Placental abruption in term and preterm gestations: evidence for heterogeneity in clinical pathways. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 785–92.Google Scholar

Zdravkovic, T, Genbacev, O. McMaster, MT, Fisher, SJ. The adverse effects of maternal smoking on the human placenta: a review. Placenta 2005; 26A: S81–6.Google Scholar

Usta, IM, Hobeika, EM, Musa, AA, et al. Placenta previa-accreta: risk factors and complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193: 1045–9.Google Scholar

Nabet, C, Ancel, PY, Burguet, A, et al. Smoking during pregnancy and preterm birth according to obstetric history: French national perinatal surveys. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2005; 19: 88–96.Google Scholar

Salihu, HM, Sharma, PP, Getahun, G. Prenatal tobacco use and risk of stillbirth: a case-control and bidirectional case–crossover study. Nicotine Tobac Res 2008; 10: 159–66.Google Scholar

Varner, MW, Silver, RM, Rowland, CJ, et al. Association between stillbirth and illicit drug use and smoking during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123: 113–25.Google Scholar

Marufu, TC, Ahankari, A, Coleman, T, Lewis, S. Maternal smoking and the risk of stillbirth: systemic review and meta-analysis. BMS Public Health 2015; 15: 239–53.Google Scholar

Flenady, V, Koopmans, L, Middleton, P, et al. Major risk factors for stillbirth in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2011; 377: 1331–40.Google Scholar

Arbeille, P, Bosc, M, Vaillant, MC, et al. Nicotine-induced changes in the cerebral circulation in ovine fetuses. Am J Perinatol 1992; 79: 645–8.Google Scholar

Lei, F, Yan, X, Zhao, F. Impairment of central chemoreception in neonatal rats induced by maternal cigarette smoke exposure during pregnancy. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0137362.Google Scholar

Franco, P, Groswasser, J, Hassid, S, et al. Prenatal exposure to cigarette smoking is associated with a decrease in arousal in infants. J Pediatr 1999; 135: 34–8.Google Scholar

Hoffman, HJ, Hillman, LS. Epidemiology of the sudden infant death syndrome: maternal, neonatal, and postneonatal risk factors. Clin Perinatol 1992; 19: 717–37.Google Scholar

Takashima, S, Armstrong, D, Becker, LE, et al. Cerebral hypoperfusion in the sudden infant death syndrome, brainstem gliosis and vasculature. Ann Neurol 1978; 4: 257–62.Google Scholar

Mezzacappa, E, Buckner, JC, Earls, F. Prenatal cigarette exposure and infant learning stimulation as predictors of cognitive control in childhood. Dev Sci 2011; 14: 881–91.Google Scholar

Drews, CD, Murphy, CC, Yeargin-Allsop, M, et al. The relationship between idiopathic mental retardation and maternal smoking during pregnancy. Pediatrics 1996; 97: 547–53.Google Scholar

Olds, DL, Henderson, CR, Tatelbaum, R. Intellectual impairment in children of women who smoke cigarettes during pregnancy. Pediatrics 1994; 93: 221–7.Google Scholar

Cornelius, MD, De Genna, NM, Leech, SL, et al. Effects of prenatal cigarette smoke exposure on neurobehavioral outcomes in 10-year-old children of adolescent mothers. Neurotoxicol Teratol 2011; 33: 137–44.Google Scholar

Cornelius, MD, Goldschmidt, L, De Genna, NM, Larkby, C. Long-term effects of prenatal cigarette smoke exposure on behavior dysregulation among 14-year-old offspring of teenage mothers. Matern Child Health J 2012; 16: 694–705.Google Scholar

Cornelius, MD, Goldschmidt, L, Day, NL. Prenatal cigarette smoking: long term effects on young adult behavior problems and smoking behavior. Neurotoxicol Teratol 2012; 34: 554–9.Google Scholar

Ernst, M, Moolchan, ET, Robisnon, ML. Behavioral and neural consequences of prenatal exposure to nicotine. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2001; 40: 630–41.Google Scholar

Polanska, K, Jurewicz, J, Hanke, W. Smoking and alcohol drinking during pregnancy as the risk factors for poor child neurodevelopment: a review of epidemiological studies. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2015; 28: 419–43.Google Scholar

John, EM, Savitz, DA, Sandler, DP. Prenatal exposure to parents’ smoking and childhood cancer. Am J Epidemiol 1991; 133: 123–32.Google Scholar

Charlton, A. Children and passive smoking: a review. J Fam Pract 1994; 38: 267–77.Google Scholar

Paulson, RB, Shanfeld, J, Mullet, D, et al. Prenatal smokeless tobacco effects on the rat fetus. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol 1994; 14: 16–25.Google Scholar

Inamdar, AS, Croucher, RE, Chokhandre, MK, et al. Maternal smokeless tobacco use in pregnancy and adverse heatlh outcomes in newborns: a systematic review. Nicotine Tobac Res 2015; 17: 1058–66.Google Scholar

England, LJ, Kim, SY, Shapiro-Mendoza, CK, et al. Effects of maternal smokeless tobacco use on selected pregnancy outcomes in Alaska Native women: a case-control study. Acta Obstet Gynaecol Scand 2013; 92: 648–55.Google Scholar

Gunnerbeck, A, Edstedt Bonamy, AK, Wikstrom, AK, et al. Maternal snuff use and smoking and the risk of oral cleft malformations: a population-based cohort study. PLoS One 2014; 9: e84715.Google Scholar

Gunnerbeck, A, Wikstrom, AK, Edstedt Bonamy, AK, et al. Relationship of maternal snuff and cigarette smoking with neonatal apnea. Pediatrics 2011; 128: 503–9.Google Scholar

Weaver, M, Breland, A, Spindle, T, Eissenberg, T. Clinical case conference electronic cigarettes: a review of safety and clinical issues. J Addict Med 2014; 8: 234–40.Google Scholar

Breland, A, Spindle, T, Weaver, M, Eissenberg, T. Science and electronic cigarettes: current data, future needs. J Addict Med 2014; 8: 223–33.Google Scholar

Suter, MA, Mastrobattista, J, Sachs, M, Aagaard, K. Is there evidence for potential harm of electronic cigarette use in pregnancy? Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2015; 103: 186–95.Google Scholar

Mark, KS, Farquhar, B, Chisolm, MS, et al. Knowledge, attitudes, and practice of electronic cigarette use among pregnant women. J Addict Med 2015; 9: 266–72.Google Scholar

Ostrea, EM, Knapp, DK, Romera, A, et al. Meconium analysis to assess fetal exposure to nicotine by active and passive maternal smoking. J Pediatr 1994; 124: 471–6.Google Scholar

Lee, BO, Hong, YC, Park, H, et al. Secondhand smoke exposure during pregnancy and infantile development. Environ Res 2011; 111: 539–44.Google Scholar

Makin, J, Fried, PA, Watkinson, B. A comparison of active and passive smoking during pregnancy: long-term effects. Neurotoxicol Teratol 1991; 13: 5–12.Google Scholar

Liu, J, Leung, PW, McCauley, L, et al. Mother’s environmental tobacco smoke exposure during pregnancy and externalizing behavior problems in children. Neurotoxicology 2013; 34: 167–74.Google Scholar

Witschi, H, Lundgaard, SM, Rajini, P, et al. Effects of exposure to nicotine and to sidestream smoke on pregnancy outcome in rats. Toxicol Lett 1994; 71: 279–86.Google Scholar

Davis, DL. Paternal smoking and fetal health. Lancet 1991; 337: 123.Google Scholar

Klonoff-Cohen, HS, Edelstein, SL, Lefkowitz, ES, et al. The effect of passive smoking and tobacco exposure through breast milk on sudden infant death syndrome. JAMA 1995; 273: 795–8.Google Scholar

Zhou, S, Rosenthal, DG, Sherman, S, et al. Physical, behavioral, and cognitive effects of prenatal tobacco and postnatal secondhand smoke exposure. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care 2014; 44: 219–41.Google Scholar

Selden, BS, Clark, RF, Curry, SC. Marijuana. Emerg Med Clin North Am 1990; 8: 8527–39.Google Scholar

Wu, TC, Tashkin, DP, Djahed, B, et al. Pulmonary hazards of smoking marijuana as compared with tobacco. N Engl J Med 1988; 318: 347–51.Google Scholar

Cornelius, MD, Taylor, PM, Geva, D, et al. Prenatal tobacco and marijuana use among adolescents: effects on offspring gestational age, growth, and morphology. Pediatrics 1995; 95: 738–43.Google Scholar

English, DR, Hulse, GK, Milne, E, et al. Maternal cannabis use and birth weight: a meta-analysis. Addiction 1997; 92: 1553–60.Google Scholar

Fried, PA, Watkinson, B, Gray, R. Growth from birth to early adolescence in offspring prenatally exposed to cigarettes and marijuana. Neurotoxicol Teratol 1999; 21: 513–25.Google Scholar

Fried, PA, Makin, JE. Neonatal behavioral correlates of prenatal exposure to marijuana, cigarettes and alcohol in a low risk population. Neurotoxicol Teratol 1987; 9: 1–7.Google Scholar

Dahl, RE, Scher, MS, Williamson, DE, et al. A longitudinal study of prenatal marijuana use: effects on sleep and arousal at age 3 years. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1995; 149: 145–50.Google Scholar

Fried, PA. Prenatal exposure to marijuana and tobacco during infancy, early and middle childhood: effects and an attempt at synthesis. Arch Toxicol Suppl 1995; 17: 233–60.Google Scholar

Fried, PA. The Ottawa Prenatal Prospective Study (OPPS): methodologic issues and findings. It’s easy to throw the baby out with the bathwater. Life Sci 1995; 56: 2159–68.Google Scholar

Campolongo, P, Trezza, V, Palmery, M, et al. Developmental exposure to cannabinoids causes subtle and enduring neurofunctional alterations. Int Rev Neurobiol 2009; 85: 117–33.Google Scholar

Schneider, M. Cannabis use in pregnancy and early life and its consequences: animal models. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2009; 259: 383–93.Google Scholar

DiNieri, JA, Wang, X, Szutorisz, H, et al. Maternal cannabis use alters ventral striatal dopamine D2 gene regulation in the offspring. Biol Psychiatry 2011; 70: 763–9.Google Scholar

Spano, MS, Ellgren, M, Wang, X, Hurd, YL. Prenatal cannabis exposure increases heroin seeking with allostatic changes in limbic enkephalin systems in adulthood. Biol Psychiatry 2007; 61: 554–63.Google Scholar

Farrar, HC, Kearns, GL. Cocaine: clinical pharmacology and toxicology. J Pediatr 1989; 115: 665–75.Google Scholar

Bailey, DN. Cocaine and cocaethylene binding to human placenta in vitro. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 527–31.Google Scholar

Jones, KL. Developmental pathogenesis of defects associated with prenatal cocaine exposure: fetal vascular disruption. Clin Perinatol 1991; 18: 139–46.Google Scholar

Singer, LT, Arendt, R, Minnes, S, et al. Cognitive and motor outcomes of cocaine-exposed infants. JAMA. 2002; 287(15): 1952–60.Google Scholar

Frank, DA, Augustyn, M, Knight, WG, et al. Growth, development, and behavior in early childhood following prenatal cocaine exposure: a systematic review. JAMA. 2001; 285(12): 1613–25.Google Scholar

Bandstra, ES, Morrow, CE, Anthony, JC, et al. Intrauterine growth of full-term infants: impact of prenatal cocaine exposure. Pediatrics 2001; 108: 1309–19.Google Scholar

Bateman, DA, Chiriboga, CA. Dose-response effect of cocaine on newborn head circumference. Pediatrics 2000; 106: e33.Google Scholar

Kuhn, L, Kline, J, Ng, S, et al. Cocaine use during pregnancy and intrauterine growth retardation: new insights based on maternal hair tests. Am J Epidemiol 2000; 152: 112–19.Google Scholar

Dinsmoor, MJ, Irons, SJ, Christmas, JT. Preterm rupture of the membranes associated with recent cocaine use. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171: 305–9.Google Scholar

Kliegman, RM, Madura, D, Kiwi, R, et al. Relation of maternal cocaine use to the risks of prematurity and low birth weight. J Pediatr 1994; 124: 751–6.Google Scholar

Iriye, BK, Bristow, RE, Hsu, CD, et al. Uterine rupture associated with recent antepartum cocaine abuse. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 83: 840–1.Google Scholar

Macones, GA, Sehdev, HM, Parry, S, et al. The association between maternal cocaine use and placenta previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 1097–100.Google Scholar

Czyrko, C, Del Pin, CA, O’Neill, JA, et al. Maternal cocaine abuse and necrotizing enterocolitis: outcome and survival. J Pediatr Surg 1991; 26: 414–18.Google Scholar

Büyükünal, C, Kiliç, N, Dervisoglu, S, et al. Maternal cocaine abuse resulting in necrotizing enterocolitis: an experimental study in a rat model. Acta Paediatr 1994; 396: 91–3.Google Scholar

Chasnoff, IJ, Bussey, ME, Savich, R, et al. Perinatal cerebral infarction and maternal cocaine use. J Pediatr 1986; 108: 456–9.Google Scholar

Singer, LT, Yamashita, TS, Hawkins, S, et al. Increased incidence of intraventricular hemorrhage and developmental delay in cocaine-exposed, very low birth weight infants. J Pediatr 1994; 124: 765–71.Google Scholar

Sims, ME, Walther, FJ. Antenatal brain injury and maternal cocaine use. J Perinatol 1989; 9: 349–50.Google Scholar

Behnke, M, Eyler, FD, Conlon, M, et al. Incidence and description of structural brain abnormalities in newborns exposed to cocaine. J Pediatr 1998; 132: 291–4.Google Scholar

Mott, SH, Packer, RJ, Soldin, SJ. Neurologic manifestations of cocaine exposure in childhood. Pediatrics 1994; 93: 557–60.Google Scholar

Chen, C, Duara, S, Neto, GS, et al. Respiratory instability in neonates with in utero exposure to cocaine. J Pediatr 1991; 119: 111–13.Google Scholar

Tronick, EZ, Frank, DA, Cabral, H, et al. Late dose-response effects of prenatal cocaine exposure on newborn neurobehavioral performance. Pediatrics 1996; 98: 76–83.Google Scholar

Chan, K, Dodd, PA, Day, L, et al. Fetal catecholamine, cardiovascular, and neurobehavioral responses to cocaine. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 167: 1616–23.Google Scholar

Knapp, S, Mandell, AJ. Narcotic drugs: effect on the serotonin biosynthetic systems of the brain. Science 1972; 177: 1209–11.Google Scholar

Durand, DJ, Espinoza, AM, Nickerson, BG. Association between prenatal cocaine exposure and sudden infant death syndrome. J Pediatr 1990; 117: 909–11.Google Scholar

Bauchner, H, Zuckerman, B, McClain, M, et al. Risk of sudden infant death syndrome among infants with in utero exposure to cocaine. J Pediatr 1988; 113: 831–4.Google Scholar

Mayes, LC, Granger, RH, Frank, MA, et al. Neurobehavioral profiles of neonates exposed to cocaine prenatally. Pediatrics 1993; 91: 778–83.Google Scholar

Eisen, LN, Field, TM, Bandstra, ES, et al. Perinatal cocaine effects on neonatal stress behavior and performance on the Brazelton scale. Pediatrics 1991; 88: 477–80.Google Scholar

Eyler, FD, Behnke, M, Conlon, M, et al. Birth outcome from a prospective, matched study of prenatal crack/cocaine use. I. Interactive and dose effects on health and growth. Pediatrics 1998; 101: 229–37.Google Scholar

Eyler, FD, Behnke, M, Conlon, M, et al. Birth outcome from a prospective, matched study of prenatal crack/cocaine use. II. Interactive and dose effects on neurobehavioral assessment. Pediatrics 1998; 101: 237–41.Google Scholar

Frank, DA, Augustyn, M, Knight, WG, et al. Growth, development, and behavior in early childhood following prenatal cocaine exposure: a systematic review. JAMA 2001; 285: 1613–25.Google Scholar

Roland, EH, Volpe, JJ. Effect of maternal cocaine use on the fetus and newborn: review of the literature. Pediatr Neurosci 1989; 15: 88–94.Google Scholar

Oro, A, Dixon, S. Perinatal cocaine and methamphetamine exposure: maternal and neonatal correlates. J Pediatr 1987; 111: 571–8.Google Scholar

Chasnoff, IJ, Lewis, DE, Squires, L. Cocaine intoxication in a breast-fed infant. Pediatrics 1987; 80: 836–8.Google Scholar

Chaney, NE, Franke, J, Waddington, WB. Cocaine convulsions in a breast-feeding baby. J Pediatr 1988; 112: 134–5.Google Scholar

Hulse, GK, Milne, E, English, DR, et al. The relationship between maternal use of heroin and methadone and infant birth weight. Addiction 1997; 92: 1571–9.Google Scholar

Barg, J, Rius, A, Bem, WT, et al. Differential development of beta-endorphin and mu-opioid binding sites in mouse brain. Dev Brain Res 1992; 66: 71–6.Google Scholar

Suguihara, C, Bancalari, E. Substance abuse during pregnancy: effects on respiratory function in the infant. Semin Perinatol 1991; 15: 302–9.Google Scholar

Olson, GD, Lees, MH. Ventilatory response to carbon dioxide of infants following chronic prenatal methadone exposure. J Pediatr 1980; 96: 983–9.Google Scholar

Bunikowski, R, Grimmer, I, Heiser, A, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome after prenatal exposure to opiates. Eur J Pediatr 1998; 157: 724–30.Google Scholar

Smialek, JE, Monforte, JR, Aronow, R, et al. Methadone deaths in children: a continuing problem. JAMA 1977; 238: 2516–17.Google Scholar

Committee on Drugs, American Academy of Pediatrics. Transfer of drugs and other chemicals into human milk. Pediatrics 1989; 84: 924–36.Google Scholar

Guo, X, Spencer, JW, Suess, PE, et al. Cognitive brain potential alterations in boys exposed to opiates: in utero and lifestyle comparisons. Addict Behav 1994; 19: 429–41.Google Scholar

Hunt, RW, Tzioumi, D, Collins, E, Jeffery, HE. Adverse neurodevelopmental outcome of infants exposed to opiate in-utero. Early Hum Dev 2008; 84: 29–35.Google Scholar

Hickey, JE, Suess, PE, Newlin, DB, et al. Vagal tone regulation during sustained attention in boys exposed to opiates in utero. Addict Behav 1995; 20: 43–59.Google Scholar

Ornoy, A, Michailevskaya, V, Lukashov, I, et al. The developmental outcome of children born to heroin-dependent mothers, raised at home or adopted. Child Abuse Negl 1996; 20: 385–96.Google Scholar

Ornoy, A, Segal, J, Bar-Hamburger, R, Greenbaum, C. Developmental outcome of school-age children born to mothers with heroin dependency: importance of environmental factors. Dev Med Child Neurol 2001; 43: 668–75.Google Scholar

Idänpäan-Heikkilä, JE, Jouppila, PI, Puolakka, JO, et al. Placental transfer and fetal metabolism of diazepam in early pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1971; 109: 1011–16.Google Scholar

Laegreid, L, Olegärd, R, Walström, J, et al. Teratogenic effects of benzodiazepine use during pregnancy. J Pediatr 1989; 114: 126–31.Google Scholar

Wikner, BN, Stiller, C-O, Bergman, U, et al. Use of benzodiazepines and benzodiazepine receptor agonists during pregnancy: neonatal outcome and congenital malformations. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2007; 16: 1203–10.Google Scholar

Eros, E, Czeizel, AE, Rockenbauer, M, et al. A population-based case control teratologic study of nitrazepam, medazepam, tofisopam, alprazolum and clonazepam treatment during pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2002; 101: 147–54.Google Scholar

Bellantuono, C, Tofani, S, Di Sciascio, G, Santone, G. Benzodiazepine exposure in pregnancy and risk of major malformations: a critical overview. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2013; 35: 3–8.Google Scholar

Ban, L, West, J, Gibson, JE, Fiaschi, L, et al. First trimester exposure to anxiolytic and hypnotic drugs and the risks of major congenital anomalies: a United Kingdom population-based cohort study. PLoS One 2014; 9: e100996.Google Scholar

Okun, ML, Ebert, R, Saini, B. A review of sleep-promoting medications used in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212: 428–41.Google Scholar

Iqbal, MM, Sobhan, T, Ryals, T. Effects of commonly used benzodiazepines on the fetus, the neonate, and the nursing infant. Psychiatr Serv 2002; 53: 39–49.Google Scholar

Kallen, B, Reis, M. Neonatal complications after maternal concomitant use of SSRI and other central nervous system active drugs during the second or third trimester of pregnancy. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2012; 32: 608–14.Google Scholar

Dessens, AB, Cohen-Kettenis, PT, Mellenbergh, GJ, et al. Association of prenatal phenobarbital and phenytoin exposure with small head size at birth and with learning problems. Acta Paediatr 2000; 89: 533–41.Google Scholar

Verrotti, A, Scaparrotta, A, Cofini, M, et al. Developmental neurotoxicity and anticonvulsant drugs: a possible link. Reprod Toxicol 2014; 48: 72–80.Google Scholar

Browne, ML, Van Zutphen, AR, Botto, LD, et al. Maternal butalbital use and selected defects in the national birth defects prevention study. Headache 2014; 54: 54–66.Google Scholar

Rementeria, JL, Bhatt, K. Withdrawal symptoms in neonates from intrauterine exposure to diazepam. J Pediatr 1977; 90: 123–6.Google Scholar

Izquierdo, LA, Yonke, N. Fetal surveillance in late pregnancy and during labor. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 2014; 41: 307–15.Google Scholar

Ladhani, NN, Shah, PS, Murphy, KE. Prenatal amphetamine exposure and birth outcomes: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gyncol 2011; 205(219): e1–7.Google Scholar

Stek, AM, Baker, RS, Fisher, BK, et al. Fetal responses to maternal and fetal methamphetamine administration in sheep. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 173: 1592–8.Google Scholar

Shah, R, Diaz, SD, Arria, A, et al. Prenatal methamphetamine exposure and short-term maternal and fetal outcomes. Am J Perinatol 2012; 29: 391–400.Google Scholar

Plessinger, MA. Prenatal exposure to amphetamines: risks and adverse outcomes in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1998; 25: 119–38.Google Scholar

Ganapathy, V, Ramamoorthy, S, Leibach, FH. Transport and metabolism of monoamines in the human placenta. Trophoblast Res 1993; 7: 35–51.Google Scholar

Ganapathy, VV, Prasad, PD, Ganapathy, ME, Leibach, FH. Drugs of abuse and placental transport. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 1999; 38: 99–110.Google Scholar

Wright, TE, Schuetter, R, Tellei, J, Sauvage, L. Methamphetamines and pregnancy outcome. J Addict Med 2015; 9: 111–17.Google Scholar

Bottalico, B, Larson, I, Brodszicki, J, et al. Norepinephrine transporter (NET), serotonin transporter (SERT), vesicular monoamine transporter (VMAT2) and organic cation transporters (OCT1, 2 and EMT) in human placenta from pre-eclamptic and normotensive pregnancies. Placenta 2004; 25: 518–29.Google Scholar

Ganapathy, V. Drugs of abuse and human placenta. Life Sci 2011; 88: 926–30.Google Scholar

Gorman, MC, Orme, KS, Nguyen, NT, et al. Outcomes in pregnancies complicated by methamphetamine use. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211(429): e1–7.Google Scholar

Geary, FH, Turnquest Wells, MA. Management of the patient in labor who has abused substances. Clin Obstet Gynecol 56: 166–72.Google Scholar

Ericksson, M, Larsson, C, Zetterström, R. Amphetamine addiction and pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynaecol Scand 1981; 60: 253–9.Google Scholar

Arria, AM, Derauf, C, LaGasse, LL, et al. Methamphetamine and other substance use during pregnancy: preliminary estimates from the infant development, environment, and lifestyle (IDEAL) study. Matern Child Health J 2006; 10: 293–302.Google Scholar

Nasif, FJ, Cuadra, GR, Ramirez, OA. Permanent alteration of cerebral noradrenergic system by prenatally administered amphetamine. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 1999; 112: 181–8.Google Scholar

Tavares, MA, Silva, MC. Differential effects of prenatal exposure to cocaine and amphetamine on growth parameters and morphometry of the prefrontal cortex in the rat. Ann NY Acad Sci 1996; 801: 256–73.Google Scholar

Tavares, MA, Silva, MC, Silva-Araujo, A, et al. Effects of prenatal exposure to amphetamine in the medial prefrontal cortex of the rat. Int J Dev Neurosci 1996; 14: 585–96.Google Scholar

Chang, L, Smith, LM, LoPresti, C, et al. Smaller subcortical volumes and cognitive deficits in children with prenatal methamphetamine exposure. Psychiatry Res 2004; 132: 95–106.Google Scholar

Dixon, SD, Bejar, R. Echoencephalographic findings in neonates associated with maternal cocaine and methamphetamine use: incidence and clinical correlates. J Pediatr 1989; 115: 770–8.Google Scholar

McElhatton, PR, Pughe, KR, Evans, C, et al. Is exposure to amphetamine-like drugs in pregnancy associated with malformations? J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2000; 38: 195–6.Google Scholar

Torfs, CP, Velie, EM, Oechsli, FW, et al. A population-based study of gastroschisis: demographic, pregnancy, and lifestyle risk factors. Teratology 1994:50: 44–53.Google Scholar

Holbrook, BD, Rayburn, WF. Teratogenic risks from exposure to illicit drugs. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2014; 41: 229–39.Google Scholar

Forrester, MB, Merz, RD. Risk of selected birth defects with prenatal illicit drug use, Hawaii, 1986–2002. J Toxicol Environ Health A 2007; 70: 7–18.Google Scholar

Little, BB, Snell, LM, Gilstrap, LC. Methamphetamine abuse during pregnancy: outcome and fetal effects. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 72: 541–4.Google Scholar

Oei, J, Abdel-Latif, ME, Clark, R, et al. Short-term outcomes of mothers and infants exposed to antenatal amphetamines. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2010; 95: F36–41.Google Scholar

Nguyen, D, Smith, LM, LaGasse, LL, et al. Intrauterine growth of infants exposed to prenatal methamphetamine: results from the infant development, environment, and lifestyle study. J Pediatr 2010; 157: 337–9.Google Scholar

Smith, LM, LaGasse, LL, Derauf, C, et al. The infant development, environment, and lifestyle study: effects of prenatal methamphetamine exposure, polydrug exposure, and poverty on intrauterine growth. Pediatrics 2006; 118: 1149–56.Google Scholar

Oro, AS, Dixon, SP. Perinatal cocaine and methamphetamine exposure: maternal and neonatal correlates. J Pediatr 1987; 111: 571–8.Google Scholar

Smith, LM, Diaz, S, LaGasse, LL, et al. Developmental and behavioral consequences of prenatal methamphetamine exposure: a review of the infant development, environment, and lifestyle (IDEAL) study. Neurotoxicol Teratol 2015; 51: 35–44.Google Scholar

Kiblawi, ZN, Smith, LM, Diaz, SD, et al. Prenatal methamphetamine exposure and neonatal and infant neurobehavioral outcome: results from the IDEAL study. Subst Abus 2014; 35: 68–73.Google Scholar

Behnke, M, Smith, VC. Prenatal substance abuse: short- and long-term effects on the exposed fetus. Pediatrics 2013; 131: e1009–24.Google Scholar

Zabaneh, R, Smith, LM, LaGasse, LL, et al. The effects of prenatal methamphetamine exposure on childhood growth patterns from birth to 3 years of age. Am J Perinatol 2012; 29: 203–10.Google Scholar

Diaz, SD, Smith, LM, LaGasse, LL, et al. Effects of prenatal methamphetamine exposure on behavioral and cognitive findings at 7.5 years of age. J Pediatr 2014; 164: 1333–8.Google Scholar

Cernerud, L, Eriksson, M, Jonsson, B, et al. Amphetamine addiction during pregnancy: 14-year follow-up of growth and school performance. Acta Paediatr 1996; 85: 204–8.Google Scholar

LaGasse, LL, Derauf, C, Smith, LL, et al. Prenatal methamphetamine exposure and childhood behavior problems at 3 and 5 years of age. Pediatrics 2012; 129: 681–8.Google Scholar

Kwiatkowski, MA, Roos, A, Stein, DJ, et al. Effects of prenatal methamphetamine exposure: a review of cognitive and neuroimaging studies. Metab Brain Dis 2014; 29: 245–54.Google Scholar

Holbrook, BD, Rayburn, WF. Teratogenic risks from exposure to illicit drugs. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2014; 41: 229–39.Google Scholar

Anderson, CE, Loomis, GA. Recognition and prevention of inhalant abuse. Am Fam Physician 2003; 68: 869–74.Google Scholar

Linden, CH. Volatile substances of abuse. Emerg Med Clin North Am 1990; 8: 559–78.Google Scholar

Scheeres, JJ, Chudley, AE. Solvent abuse in pregnancy: a perinatal perspective. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2001; 24: 22–6.Google Scholar

Geary, FH, Turnquist Wells, MA. Management of the patient in labor who has abuse substances. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2013; 56: 166–72.Google Scholar

Jones, HE, Balster, RL. Inhalant abuse in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1998; 25: 153–67.Google Scholar

Hannigan, JH, Bowen, SE. Reproductive toxicology and teratology of abused toluene. Syst Biol Reprod Med 2010; 56: 184–200.Google Scholar

Ghantous, H, Danielsson, BRG. Placental transfer and distribution of toluene, xylene, and benzene and their metabolites during gestation in mice. Biol Res Pregnancy 1986; 7: 98–105.Google Scholar

Stoltenbeurg-Didinger, G, Altenkirch, H, Wagner, M. Neurotoxicity of organic solvent mixtures: embryotoxicity and fetotoxicity. Neurotoxicol Teratol 1990; 12: 585–9.Google Scholar

Gospe, SM, Zhou, SS. Prenatal exposure to toluene results in abnormal neurogenesis and migration in rat somatosensory cortex. Pediatr Res 2000; 47: 362–8.Google Scholar

Gospe, SM, Zhou, SS. Toluene abuse embryopathy: longitudinal neurodevelopmental effects of prenatal exposure to toluene in rats. Reprod Toxicol 1998; 12: 119–26.Google Scholar

Bowen, SE, Hannigan, JH. Developmental toxicity of prenatal exposure to toluene. AAPS J 2006; 8: E419–24.Google Scholar

Bowen, SE, Batis, JC, Mohammadi, MH, Hannigan, JH. Abuse pattern of gestational toluene exposure and early postnatal development in rats. Neurotoxicol Teratol 2005; 27: 105–16.Google Scholar

Pearson, MA, Hoyme, HE, Seaver, LH, et al. Toluene embryopathy: delineation of the phenotype and comparison with fetal alcohol syndrome. Pediatrics 1994; 93: 211–15.Google Scholar

Arnold, GL, Kirby, RS, Langendoerfer, S, Wilkins-Haug, L. Toluene embryopathy: clinical delineation and developmental follow-up. Pediatrics 1994; 93: 216–20.Google Scholar

Bowen, SE. Two serious and challenging medical complications associated with volatile substance misuse: sudden sniffing death and fetal solvent syndrome. Subst Use Misuse 2011; 46: 68–72.Google Scholar

Boynukalin, FK, Baykal, C. Prenatal diagnosis of multiple fetal anomalies in naphthalene-addicted pregnant women: a case report. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2014; 41: 217–18.Google Scholar

Schutzman, DL, Frankenfield-Chernicoff, M, Clatterbaugh, HE, et al. Incidence of intrauterine cocaine exposure in a suburban setting. Pediatrics 1991; 88: 825–7.Google Scholar

Chasnoff, IJ, Landres, HJ, Barrett, ME. The prevalence of illicit-drug or alcohol use during pregnancy and discrepancies in mandatory reporting in Pinellas County, Florida. N Engl J Med 1990; 322: 1202–6.Google Scholar

Farrar, HC, Kearns, GL. Cocaine: clinical pharmacology and toxicology. J Pediatr 1989; 115: 665–75.Google Scholar

Ryan, RM, Wagner, CL, Schultz, JM, et al. Meconium analysis for improved identification of infants exposed to cocaine in utero. J Pediatr 1994; 125: 435–40.Google Scholar

Saitoh, M, Uzuka, M, Sakamoto, M. Rate of hair growth. Adv Biol Skin 1969; 9: 183–201.Google Scholar

Baumgartner, WA, Hill, VA, Bland, WH. Hair analysis for drug abuse. J Forensic Sci 1989; 34: 1433–53.Google Scholar

Marques, PR, Tippetts, AS, Branch, DG. Cocaine in the hair of mother-infant pairs: quantitative analysis and correlations with urine measurements and self report. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 1993; 19: 159–75.Google Scholar

References

Walker, JJ. Pre-eclampsia. Lancet 2000; 356: 1260–5.Google Scholar

Main, EK, McCain, CL, Morton, CH, et al. Pregnancy related mortality in California: causes, characteristics, and improvement opportunities. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 125: 938–47.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy. Hypertension in pregnancy: report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122(5): 1122–31.Google Scholar

National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Pregnancy. Report of the National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183: S1–22.Google Scholar

Rogers, LK, Velten, M. Maternal inflammation, growth retardation, and preterm birth: insights into adult cardiovascular disease. Life Sci 2011; 89: 417–21.Google Scholar

Markham, KB, Funai, EF. Pregnancy-related hypertension. In Creasy, RK, Resnik, R, Iams, JD, et al., eds., Maternal-Fetal Medicine: Principles and Practice, 7th edn. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2014: 856–81.Google Scholar

American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Diagnosis and Management of Preeclampsia and Eclampsia (American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Practice Bulletin Number 33), ACOG, Washington, DC, 2002 (reaffirmed 2012).Google Scholar

Spong, CY, Mercer, BM, D’Alton, M, et al. Timing of indicated late-preterm and early-term birth. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 118: 323–33.Google Scholar

Abalos, A, Duley, L, Steyn, DW. Antihypertensive drug therapy for mild to moderate hypertension during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 2: CD002252Google Scholar

Magee, L.A., Elran, E., Bull, S.B., et al: Risks and benefits of beta receptor blockers for pregnancy hypertension: overview of the randomized trials. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2000; 88: 15–26.Google Scholar

Magee, LA, von Dadelszen, P, Rey, E, et al. The control of hypertension in pregnancy study (CHIPS) randomized controlled trial. Pregnancy Hypertens 2015; 5: 2.Google Scholar

Buchbinder, A, Sibai, BM, Caritis, S, et al. Adverse perinatal outcomes are significantly higher in severe gestational hypertension than in mild preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: 66–71.Google Scholar

Saudan, P, Brown, MA, Buddle, ML, et al. Does gestational hypertension become pre-eclampsia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 105: 1177–84.Google Scholar

Wu, Y, Xiong, X, Fraser, WD, et al. Association of uric acid with progression to preeclampsia and development of adverse conditions in gestational hypertensive pregnancies. Am J Hypertens 2012; 25: 711–17.Google Scholar

Sibai, BM. Eclampsia. VI. Maternal-perinatal outcome in 254 consecutive cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163: 1049–54.Google Scholar

North, RA, Taylor, RS, Schellenberg, JC. Evaluation of a definition of preeclampsia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 106: 767–73.Google Scholar

Woelkers, D, Barton, J, von Dadelszen, P, et al. Rates of adverse outcomes are elevated in preterm patients with suspected hypertensive disorders without diagnostic criteria for preeclampsia. Pregnancy Hypertens 2015; 5: 39.Google Scholar

Abalos, E, Cuesta, C, Grosso, AL, et al. Global and regional estimates of preeclampsia and eclampsia: a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2013; 170: 1–7.Google Scholar

Sibai, BM, Barton, JR. Expectant management of severe preeclampsia remote from term: patient selection, treatment, and delivery indications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 196: 514.e1–9.Google Scholar

Sibai, BM. Pre-eclampsia. Lancet 2005; 365: 785–99.Google Scholar

Wang, A, Rana, S, Karumanchi, SA. Preeclampsia: the role of angiogenic factors in its pathogenesis. Physiology 2009; 24: 147–58.Google Scholar

Ness, RB, Sibai, BM. Shared and disparate components of the pathophysiologies of fetal growth restriction and preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gyncol 2006; 195: 40–9.Google Scholar

Sibai, BM. Management of late preterm and early-term pregnancies complicated by mild gestational hypertension/pre-eclampsia. Semin Perinatol 2011; 35: 292–6.Google Scholar

Bombrys, AE, Barton, JR, Nowacki, EA, et al. Expectant management of severe pre-eclampsia at less than 27 weeks’ gestation: maternal and perinatal outcomes according to gestational age by weeks at onset of expectant management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199: 247.e1–6.Google Scholar

Sibai, BM. Magnesium sulfate prophylaxis in preeclampsia: lessons learned from recent trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190: 1520–6.Google Scholar

Altman, D, Carroli, G, Duley, L, et al. Do women with pre-eclampsia, and their babies, benefit from magnesium sulfate? The Magpie Trial: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2002; 1: 1877–90.Google Scholar

Resnik, R, Creasy, RK. Intrauterine growth restriction. In Creasy, RK, Resnik, R, Iams, JD, et al., eds., Maternal-Fetal Medicine: Principles and Practice, 7th edn. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2014: 743–55.Google Scholar

Friedman, SA, Schiff, E, Kao, L, et al. Neonatal outcome after preterm delivery for preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172: 1785–92.Google Scholar

Mendola, P, Mumford, SL, Mannisto, TI, et al. Controlled direct effects of preeclampsia on neonatal health after accounting for mediation by preterm birth. Epidemiology 2015; 26: 17–26.Google Scholar

Riaz, M, Porat, R, Brodsky, NL, et al. The effects of maternal magnesium sulfate treatment on newborns: a prospective controlled study. J Perinatol 1998; 18: 449–54.Google Scholar

Greenberg, MB, Penn, AA, Whitaker, KR, et al. Effect of magnesium sulfate exposure on term neonates. J Perinatol 2013; 33: 188–93.Google Scholar

Rouse, D, Hirtz, DG, Thom, E, et al. A randomized controlled trial of magnesium sulfate for the prevention of cerebral palsy. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 895–905.Google Scholar

Duley, L, Meher, S, Jones, L. Drugs for treatment of very high blood pressure during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 7: CD001449.Google Scholar

Cooper, WO, Hernandez-Diaz, S, Arbogast, PG, et al. Major congenital malformations after first-trimester exposure to ACE inhibitors. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 2443–51Google Scholar

Magee, LA, Cham, C, Waterman, EJ, et al. Hydralazine for treatment of severe hypertension in pregnancy: meta-analysis. BMJ 2003; 327: 955–64.Google Scholar

References

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Executive summary: Neonatal encephalopathy and neurologic outcome (2nd edn.) Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Task Force on Neonatal Encephalopathy. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123(4): 896–901.Google Scholar

Births: Final data for 2013. National Vital Statistics Reports. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 2014. Available at www.cdc.gov/nchs/data (accessed July 2015).Google Scholar

Martin, JA, Hamilton, BE, Osterman, MJK, et al. Births: Final data for 2012. In National Vital Statistics Reports; vol 62, no 9. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 2013. Available from www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr62/nvsr62_09.pdf (accessed July 2015).Google Scholar

March of Dimes. Peri stats: births by method of delivery, 1994–2004. 2006. Available at www.marchofdimes.com/peristats/ (accessed January 2008).Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Caughey, AB, Cahill, AG, Guise, JM, Rouse, DJ. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210(3): 179–93.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Cesarean delivery on maternal request (Committee Opinion No. 559). Obstet Gynecol 2013; 121(4): 904–7.Google Scholar

Villar, J, Carroli, G, Zavaleta, N, et al. Maternal and neonatal individual risks and benefits associated with caesarean delivery: multicentre prospective study. BMJ 2007; 335: 1025–35.Google Scholar

Deneux-Tharaux, C, Carmona, E, Bouvier-Colle, MH, Breart, G. Postpartum maternal mortality and cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108: 541–8.Google Scholar

Nisenblat, V, Barak, S, Griness, OB, et al. Maternal complications associated with multiple cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108: 21–6.Google Scholar

Gilbert, SA, Grobman, WA, Landon, MB. Cost-effectiveness of trial of labor after previous cesarean in a minimally biased cohort. Am J Perinatol 2013; 30(1): 11–20.Google Scholar

Liu, S, Liston, RM, Joseph, KS, et al. Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term. Maternal Health Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System. CMAJ 2007; 176: 455–60.Google Scholar

Kennare, R, Tucker, G, Heard, A, et al. Risks of adverse outcomes in the next birth after a first cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109: 270–6.Google Scholar

Gregory, KD, Jackson, S, Korst, L, Fridman, M. Cesarean versus vaginal delivery: whose risks? Whose benefits? Am J Perinatol 2012; 29:7–18.Google Scholar

Cunningham, FG, Bangdiwala, SI, Brown, SS, et al. NIH consensus development conference draft statement on vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. NIH Consens State Sci Statements 2010; 27(3): 1–42.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery (Practice Bulletin No. 115). Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116(2 Pt 1): 450–63.Google Scholar

Grobman, WA, Lai, Y, Landon, MB, et al. Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109: 806–12.Google Scholar

Peaceman, AM, Gersnoviez, R, Landon, MB, et al. The MFMU Cesarean Registry: impact of fetal size on trial of labor success for patients with previous cesarean for dystocia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195: 1127–31.Google Scholar

Landon, MB, Spong, CY, Thom, E, et al. Risk of uterine rupture with a trial of labor in women with multiple and single prior cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108: 12–20.Google Scholar

Miller, ES, Grobman, WA. Obstetric outcomes associated with induction of labor after two prior cesarean deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213(1): 89.Google Scholar

Gyamfi, C, Juhasz, G, Gyamfi, P, et al. Single- versus double-layer uterine incision closure and uterine rupture. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2006; 19: 639–43.Google Scholar

Bujold, E, Goyet, M, Marcoux, S, Brassard, N, et al. The role of uterine closure in the risk of uterine rupture. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116(1): 43–50.Google Scholar

Roberge, S, Chaillet, N, Boutin, A, et al. Single- versus double-layer closure of the hysterotomy incision during cesarean delivery and risk of uterine rupture. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2011; 115(1): 5–10.Google Scholar

Cahill, AG, Stamilio, DM, Odibo, AO, et al. Does a maximum dose of oxytocin affect risk for uterine rupture in candidates for vaginal birth after cesarean delivery? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197: 495.e1–5.Google Scholar

Harper, LM, Cahill, AG, Boslaugh, S, et al. Association of induction of labor and uterine rupture in women attempting vaginal birth after cesarean: a survival analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206(1): 51.e1–5.Google Scholar

Kok, N, Wiersma, IC, Opmeer, BC, et al. Sonographic measurement of lower uterine segment thickness to predict uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with previous Cesarean section: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42(2): 132–9.Google Scholar

Guise, JM, Denman, MA, Emeis, C, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 115(6): 1267–78.Google Scholar

Fisler, RE, Cohen, A, Ringer, SA, Lieberman, E. Neonatal outcome after trial of labor compared with elective repeat cesarean section. Birth 2003; 30: 83–8.Google Scholar

Spong, CY, Landon, MB, Gilbert, S, et al. Risk of uterine rupture and adverse perinatal outcome at term after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110: 801–7.Google Scholar

Chen, HY, Chauhan, SP, Grobman, WA, et al. Association of labor induction or stimulation with infant mortality in women with failed versus successful trial of labor after prior cesarean. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013; 26(12): 1162–5.Google Scholar

Rossi, AC, D’Addario, V. Maternal morbidity following a trial of labor after cesarean section vs elective repeat cesarean delivery: a systematic review with metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 199(3): 224–31.Google Scholar

Knight, HE, Gurol-Urganci, I, van der Meulen, JH, et al. Vaginal birth after caesarean section: a cohort study investigating factors associated with its uptake and success. BJOG. 2014; 121(2): 183–92.Google Scholar

Uddin, SF, Simon, AE. Rates and success rates of trial of labor after cesarean delivery in the United States, 1990–2009. Matern Child Health J. 2013; 17(7): 1309–14.Google Scholar

Landon, MB, Leindecker, S, Spong, CY, et al. The MFMU Cesarean Registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193: 1016–23.Google Scholar

Cahill, AG, Stamilio, DM, Odibo, AO, et al. Is vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) or elective repeat cesarean safer in women with a prior vaginal delivery? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195: 1143–7.Google Scholar

Macario, A, El-Sayed, YY, Druzin, ML. Cost-effectiveness of a trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery depends on the a priori chance of success. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2004; 47: 378–85.Google Scholar

Costantine, MM, Fox, K, Byers, BD, et al. Validation of the prediction model for success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 114(5): 1029–33.Google Scholar

Marshall, NE, Fu, R, Guise, J-M. Impact of multiple cesarean deliveries on maternal morbidity: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205: 262.e1–8.Google Scholar

Pare, E, Quinones, JN, Macones, GA. Vaginal birth after caesarean section versus elective repeat caesarean section: assessment of maternal downstream health outcomes. BJOG 2006; 113: 75–85.Google Scholar

Gilbert, SA, Grobman, WA, Landon, MB, et al. Lifetime cost-effectiveness of trial of labor after cesarean in the United States. Value Health 2013; 16(6): 953–64.Google Scholar

Guiliano, M, Closset, E, Therby, D, et al. Signs, symptoms and complications of complete and partial uterine ruptures during pregnancy and delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014; 179: 130–4.Google Scholar

Cahill, AG, Odibo, AO, Allsworth, JE, et al. Frequent epidural dosing as a marker for impending uterine rupture in patients who attempt vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 202(4): 355.e1–5.Google Scholar

Catanzarite, V, Cousins, L, Dowling, D, et al. Oxytocin-associated rupture of an unscarred uterus in a primigravida. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108 (3 Pt 2): 723–5.Google Scholar

Gibbins, KJ, Weber, T, Holmgren, CM, et al. Maternal and fetal morbidity associated with uterine rupture of the unscarred uterus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213(3): 382.e1–6.Google Scholar

Walsh, CA, Baxi, LV. Rupture of the primigravid uterus: a review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2007; 62: 327–34.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Operative vaginal delivery: clinical management guidelines for obstetrician–gynecologists. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2001; 74: 69–76 (reaffirmed 2012).Google Scholar

O’Mahony, F, Hofmeyr, GJ, Menon, V. Choice of instruments for assisted vaginal delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; 10(11): CD005455.Google Scholar

Johnson, JH, Figueroa, R, Garry, D, et al. Immediate maternal and neonatal effects of forceps and vacuum-assisted deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103: 513–18.Google Scholar

Caughey, AB, Sandberg, PL, Zlatnik, MG, et al. Forceps compared with vacuum: rates of neonatal and maternal morbidity. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106: 908–12.Google Scholar

Schot, MJ, Halbertsma, FJ, Katgert, T, et al. Development of children with symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage born after vacuum extraction. J Child Neurol 2013; 28(4): 520–3.Google Scholar

Kolderup, LB, Laros, RK, Musci, TJ. Incidence of persistent birth injury in macrosomic infants: association with mode of delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 37–41.Google Scholar

Aiken, AR, Aiken, CE, Alberry, MS. Management of fetal malposition in the second stage of labor: a propensity score analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212(3): 355.e1–7.Google Scholar

Tempest, N, Hart, A, Walkinshaw, S, et al. A re-evaluation of the role of rotational forceps: retrospective comparison of maternal and perinatal outcomes following different methods of birth for malposition in the second stage of labour. BJOG 2013; 120(10): 1277–84.Google Scholar

Bhide, A, Guven, M, Prefumo, F, et al. Maternal and neonatal outcome after failed ventouse delivery: comparison of forceps versus cesarean section. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2007; 20(7): 541–5.Google Scholar

Lurie, S, Glezerman, M, Baider, C, et al. Decision-to-delivery interval for instrumental vaginal deliveries: vacuum extraction versus forceps. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2006; 274(1): 34–6.Google Scholar

Towner, D, Castro, MA, Eby-Wilkens, E, et al. Effect of mode of delivery in nulliparous women on neonatal intracranial injury. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 1709–14.Google Scholar

Gardella, C, Taylor, M, Benedetti, T, et al. The effect of sequential use of vacuum and forceps for assisted vaginal delivery on neonatal and maternal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185(4):896–902.Google Scholar

Carmody, F, Grant, A, Mutch, L, et al. Follow up of babies delivered in a randomized controlled comparison of vacuum extraction and forceps delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1986; 65: 763–6.Google Scholar

Johanson, RB, Heycock, E, Carter, J, et al. Maternal and child health after assisted vaginal delivery: five-year follow up of a randomized, controlled study comparing forceps and ventouse. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 106(6): 544–9.Google Scholar

Wesley, BD, van den Berg, BJ, Reece, EA. The effect of forceps delivery on cognitive development. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169: 1091–5.Google Scholar

Ngan, HY, Miu, P, Ko, L, et al. Long-term neurological sequelae following vacuum extractor delivery. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 1990; 30: 111–14.Google Scholar

Sokol, RJ, Blackwell, SC. Shoulder dystocia (ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 40). Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2003; 80: 87–92 (reaffirmed 2015).Google Scholar

Paris, AE, Greenberg, JA, Ecker, JL, McElrath, TF. Is an episiotomy necessary with a shoulder dystocia? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205(217): e1–3.Google Scholar

Boulvain, M, Senat, MV, Perrotin, F, et al. Induction of labour versus expectant management for large-for-date fetuses: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2015; 385(9987): 2600–5.Google Scholar

Dajani, NK, Magann, EF. Complications of shoulder dystocia. Semin Perinatol 2014; 38(4): 201–4.Google Scholar

Spain, JE, Frey, HA, Tuuli, MG, et al. Neonatal morbidity associated with shoulder dystocia maneuvers. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212(3): 353.e1–5.Google Scholar

Fong, A, Chau, CT, Pan, D, et al. Amniotic fluid embolism: antepartum, intrapartum and demographic factors. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2015; 28(7): 793–8.Google Scholar

Clark, SL, Hankins, GD, Dudley, DA, et al. Amniotic fluid embolism: analysis of the national registry. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172: 1158–67.Google Scholar

Kramer, MS, Rouleau, J, Liu, S, et al. Amniotic fluid embolism: incidence, risk factors, and impact on perinatal outcome. BJOG 2012; 119(7): 874–9.Google Scholar

Clark, SL, Montz, FJ, Phelan, JP. Hemodynamic alterations associated with amniotic fluid embolism: a reappraisal. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 151: 617–21.Google Scholar

Kanayama, N, Tamura, N. Amniotic fluid embolism: pathophysiology and new strategies for management. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2014; 40(6): 1507–17.Google Scholar

Shen, F, Wang, L, Yang, W, et al. From appearance to essence: 10 years review of atypical amniotic fluid embolism. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2015; 292(2): 329–34.Google Scholar

Benson, MD, Kobayashi, H, Silver, RK, et al. Immunologic studies in presumed amniotic fluid embolism. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 97: 510–14.Google Scholar

Conde-Agudelo, A, Romero, R. Amniotic fluid embolism: an evidence-based review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201(5): 445.e1–13.Google Scholar

O’Shea, A, Eappen, S. Amniotic fluid embolism. Int Anesthesiol Clin 2007; 45(1): 17–28.Google Scholar

Cunningham, FG, Williams, JW. Williams Obstetrics, 21st edn. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2001.Google Scholar

Czikk, MJ, McCarthy, FP, Murphy, KE. Chorioamnionitis: from pathogenesis to treatment. Clin Microbiol Infect 2011; 17(9): 1304–11.Google Scholar

Grether, JK, Nelson, KB. Maternal infection and cerebral palsy in infants of normal birth weight. JAMA 1997; 278: 207–11.Google Scholar

Wu, YW, Escobar, GJ, Grether, JK, et al. Chorioamnionitis and cerebral palsy in term and near-term infants. JAMA 2003; 290(20): 2677–84.Google Scholar

Nasef, N, Shabaan, AE, Schurr, P, et al. Effect of clinical and histological chorioamnionitis on the outcome of preterm infants. Am J Perinatol 2013; 30(1): 59–68.Google Scholar

Malloy, MH. Chorioamnionitis: epidemiology of newborn management and outcome United States 2008. J Perinatol 2014; 34(8): 611–5.Google Scholar

Fishman, SG, Gelber, SE. Evidence for the clinical management of chorioamnionitis. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2012; 17(1): 46–50.Google Scholar

Chapman, E, Reveiz, L, Illanes, E, et al. Antibiotic regimens for management of intra-amniotic infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014 19(12): CD010976.Google Scholar

Lyell, DJ, Pullen, K, Fuh, K, et al. Daily compared with 8-hour gentamicin for the treatment of intrapartum chorioamnionitis: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 115(2 Pt 1): 344–9.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Management of late-term and postterm pregnancies (Practice Bulletin No. 146). Obstet Gynecol 2014; 124(2 Pt 1): 390–6.Google Scholar

Romero, R, Yoon, BH, Chaemsaithong, P, et al. Bacteria and endotoxin in meconium-stained amniotic fluid at term: could intra-amniotic infection cause meconium passage? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2014; 27: 775–88.Google Scholar

Beligere, N, Rao, R. Neurodevelopmental outcome of infants with meconium aspiration syndrome: report of a study and literature review. J Perinatol 2008; 28(Suppl. 3):S93–101.Google Scholar

Hofmeyr, GJ, Xu, H, Eke, AC. Amnioinfusion for meconium-stained liquor in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 1: CD000014.Google Scholar

Katz, VL, Seeds, JW. Malpresentations other than breech. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1986; 29(2): 329–38.Google Scholar

Chou, MR, Kreiser, D, Taslimi, MM, et al. Vaginal versus ultrasound examination of fetal occiput position during the second stage of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 521–4.Google Scholar

Zahalka, N, Sadan, O, Malinger, G, et al. Comparison of transvaginal sonography with digital examination and transabdominal sonography for the determination of fetal head position in the second stage of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193(2): 381–6.Google Scholar

Cruikshank, DP, White, CA. Obstetric malpresentations: twenty years’ experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1973; 116: 1097–104.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee on Practice Bulletins: Obstetrics (Practice Bulletin No. 161: External Cephalic Version). Obstet Gynecol 2016; 127(2): e54–61.Google Scholar

Hannah, ME, Hannah, WJ, Hewson, SA, et al. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet 2000; 356: 1375–83.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Mode of term single breech delivery (Committee Opinion No. 265). Obstet Gynecol 2001; 98: 1189–90.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Mode of term singleton breech delivery (Committee Opinion No. 340). Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108: 235–7.Google Scholar

Whyte, H, Hannah, ME, Saigal, S, et al. Outcomes of children at 2 years after planned cesarean birth versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the International Randomized Term Breech Trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 864–71.Google Scholar

Berhan, Y, Haileamlak, A. The risks of planned vaginal breech delivery versus planned caesarean section for term breech birth: a meta-analysis including observational studies. BJOG 2016; 123(1): 49–57.Google Scholar

Caughey, AB, Sharshiner, R, Cheng, YW. Fetal malposition: impact and management. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2015; 58(2): 241–5.Google Scholar

Lieberman, E, Davidson, K, Lee-Parritz, A, et al. Changes in fetal position during labor and their association with epidural analgesia. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105(5 Pt 1): 974–82.Google Scholar

Cheng, YW, Shaffer, BL, Caughey, AB. The association between persistent occiput posterior position and neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107(4): 837–44.Google Scholar

Reichman, O, Gdansky, E, Latinsky, B, et al. Digital rotation from occipito-posterior to occipito-anterior decreases the need for cesarean section. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008; 136(1): 25–8.Google Scholar

Cluver, C, Hofmeyr, GJ, Gyte, GM, et al. Interventions for helping to turn term breech babies to head first presentation when using external cephalic version. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 1: CD000184.Google Scholar

Hofmeyr, GJ, Kulier, R, West, HM. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 4: CD000083.Google Scholar

Kaymak, O, Iskender, C, Ibanoglu, M, et al. Retrospective evaluation of risk factors and perinatal outcome of umbilical cord prolapse during labor. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2015; 19(13): 2336–9.Google Scholar

Hartigan, L, Hehir, M, McHugh, A, et al. Analysis of incidence and outcomes of umbilical cord prolapse over 20 years at a large tertiary referral center (abstract no. 431). Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 208(Suppl. 1): S188.Google Scholar

Gibbons, C, O’Herlihy, C, Murphy, JF. Umbilical cord prolapsed – changing patterns and improved outcomes: a retrospective cohort study. BJOG 2014; 121(13): 1705–8.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Dystocia and augmentation of labor (Practice Bulletin No. 49). Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102: 1445–54.Google Scholar

Friedman, EA. Primigravid labor: a graphicostatistical analyis. Obstet Gynecol 1955; 6(6): 567–89.Google Scholar

Kilpatrick, SJ, Laros, RK. Characteristics of normal labor. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 74: 85–7.Google Scholar

Cheng, YW, Shaffer, BL, Nicholson, JM, et al. Second stage of labor and epidural use: a larger effect than previously suggested. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123(3): 527–35.Google Scholar

Myles, TD, Santolaya, J. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in patients with a prolonged second stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102: 52–8.Google Scholar

Rouse, DJ, Weiner, SJ, Bloom, SL, et al. Second-stage labor duration in nulliparous women: relationship to maternal and perinatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201(4): 357.e1–7.Google Scholar

Sung, JF, Daniels, KI, Brodzinsky, L, et al. Cesarean delivery outcomes after a prolonged second stage of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197: 306.e1–5.Google Scholar

Benfield, N, Young-Lin, N, Kimona, C, et al. Fistula after attended delivery and the challenge of obstetric care capacity in the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2015; 130(2): 157–60.Google Scholar

Chen, HY, Chauhan, SP, Ananth, CV, et al. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and its relationship to neonatal and infant mortality in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 204(6): 491.e1–10.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Management of intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings (Practice Bulletin No. 116). Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116(5): 1232–40.Google Scholar

Alfirevic, Z, Devane, D, Gyte, GM. Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 5: CD006066.Google Scholar

Nielsen, PV, Stigsby, B, Nickelsen, C, et al. Intra- and inter-observer variability in the assessment of intrapartum cardiotocograms. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1987; 66: 421–4.Google Scholar

Hruban, L, Spilka, J, Chudáček, V, et al. Agreement on intrapartum cardiotocogram recordings between expert obstetricians. J Eval Clin Pract 2015; 21(4): 694–702.Google Scholar

Chauhan, SP, Klauser, CK, Woodring, TC, et al. Intrapartum nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracing and prediction of adverse outcomes: interobserver variability. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199(6): 623.e1–5.Google Scholar

Macones, GA, Hankins, GD, Spong, CY, et al. The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Workshop Report on Electronic Fetal Monitoring: update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2008; 37(5): 510–5.Google Scholar

Liu, L, Tuuli, MG, Roehl, KA, et al. Electronic fetal monitoring patterns associated with respiratory morbidity in term neonates. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213(5): 681.e1–6.Google Scholar

Cahill, AG, Caughey, AB, Roehl, KA, et al. Terminal fetal heart decelerations and neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122(5): 1070–6.Google Scholar

Nelson, KB, Dambrosia, JM, Ting, TY, et al. Uncertain value of electronic fetal monitoring in predicting cerebral palsy. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 613–18.Google Scholar

Amer-Wahlin, I, Kwee, A. Combined cardiotocographic and ST event analysis: a review. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2016; 30: 48–61.Google Scholar

Clark, SL, Hankins, GD. Temporal and demographic trends in cerebral palsy: fact and fiction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188: 628–33.Google Scholar

Graham, EM, Adami, RR, McKenney, SL, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fetal heart rate monitoring in the identification of neonatal encephalopathy. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 124(3): 507–13.Google Scholar

Graham, EM, Ruis, KA, Hartman, AL, et al. A systematic review of the role of intrapartum hypoxia-ischemia in the causation of neonatal encephalopathy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199(6): 587–95.Google Scholar

References

Stoknes, M, Andersen, GL, Dahlseng, MO, et al. Cerebral palsy and neonatal death in term singletons born small for gestational age. Pediatrics 2012; 130: e1629–35.Google Scholar

Garfinkle, J, Wintermark, P, Shevell, MI, et al. Cerebral palsy after neonatal encephalopathy: how much is preventable? J Pediatr 2015; 167: 58–63.Google Scholar

Westgate, JA, Wibbens, B, Bennet, L, et al. The intrapartum deceleration in center stage: a physiological approach to interpretation of fetal heart rate changes in labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197: e1–e11.236.Google Scholar

Nelson, KB, Dambrosia, JM, Ting, TY, Grether, JK. Uncertain value of electronic fetal monitoring in predicting cerebral palsy. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 613–8.Google Scholar

Low, JA, Lindsay, BG, Derrick, EJ. Threshold of metabolic acidosis associated with newborn complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 1391–4.Google Scholar

Westgate, JA, Gunn, AJ, Gunn, TR. Antecedents of neonatal encephalopathy with fetal acidaemia at term. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 106: 774–82.Google Scholar

Cowan, F, Rutherford, M, Groenendaal, F, et al. Origin and timing of brain lesions in term infants with neonatal encephalopathy. Lancet 2003; 361: 736–42.Google Scholar

Hellstrom-Westas, L, Rosen, I, Svenningsen, NW. Predictive value of early continuous amplitude integrated EEG recordings on outcome after severe birth asphyxia in full term infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1995; 72: F34–8.Google Scholar

Roth, SC, Baudin, J, Cady, E, et al. Relation of deranged neonatal cerebral oxidative metabolism with neurodevelopmental outcome and head circumference at 4 years. Dev Med Child Neurol 1997; 39: 718–25.Google Scholar

Edwards, AD, Brocklehurst, P, Gunn, AJ, et al. Neurological outcomes at 18 months of age after moderate hypothermia for perinatal hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy: synthesis and meta-analysis of trial data. BMJ 2010; 340: c363.Google Scholar

Robertson, CM, Finer, NN. Long-term follow-up of term neonates with perinatal asphyxia. Clin Perinatol 1993; 20: 483–500.Google Scholar

Jonsson, M, Agren, J, Norden-Lindeberg, S, et al. Neonatal encephalopathy and the association to asphyxia in labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211(667): e1–8.Google Scholar

Johnston, MV. Excitotoxicity in perinatal brain injury. Brain Pathol 2005; 15: 234–40.Google Scholar

Wassink, G, Gunn, ER, Drury, PP, et al. The mechanisms and treatment of asphyxial encephalopathy. Front Neurosci 2014; 8: 40.Google Scholar

Deng, W, Yue, Q, Rosenberg, PA, et al. Oligodendrocyte excitotoxicity determined by local glutamate accumulation and mitochondrial function. J Neurochem 2006; 98: 213–22.Google Scholar

Niquet, J, Seo, DW, Allen, SG, Wasterlain, CG. Hypoxia in presence of blockers of excitotoxicity induces a caspase-dependent neuronal necrosis. Neuroscience 2006; 141: 77–86.Google Scholar

Boddy, K, Dawes, GS, Fisher, R, et al. Foetal respiratory movements, electrocortical and cardiovascular responses to hypoxaemia and hypercapnia in sheep. J Physiol 1974; 243: 599–618.Google Scholar

Blood, AB, Hunter, CJ, Power, GG. Adenosine mediates decreased cerebral metabolic rate and increased cerebral blood flow during acute moderate hypoxia in the near-term fetal sheep. J Physiol 2003; 553: 935–45.Google Scholar

Hunter, CJ, Bennet, L, Power, GG, et al. Key neuroprotective role for endogenous adenosine A1 receptor activation during asphyxia in the fetal sheep. Stroke 2003; 34: 2240–5.Google Scholar

Li, J, Takeda, Y, Hirakawa, M. Threshold of ischemic depolarization for neuronal injury following four-vessel occlusion in the rat cortex. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2000; 12: 247–54.Google Scholar

Fisher, DJ, Heymann, MA, Rudolph, AM. Fetal myocardial oxygen and carbohydrate consumption during acutely induced hypoxemia. Am J Physiol 1982; 242: H657–61.Google Scholar

Turbow, RM, Curran-Everett, D, Hay, WW Jr, Jones, MD Jr. Cerebral lactate metabolism in near-term fetal sheep. Am J Physiol 1995; 269: R938–42.Google Scholar

Harris, DL, Weston, PJ, Harding, JE. Lactate, rather than ketones, may provide alternative cerebral fuel in hypoglycaemic newborns. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2015; 100: F161–4.Google Scholar

Gunn, AJ, Bennet, L. Fetal hypoxia insults and patterns of brain injury: insights from animal models. Clin Perinatol 2009; 36: 579–93.Google Scholar

McIntosh, GH, Baghurst, KI, Potter, BJ, Hetzel, BS. Foetal brain development in the sheep. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 1979; 5: 103–14.Google Scholar

Longo, LD, Koos, BJ, Power, GG. Fetal myoglobin: quantitative determination and importance for oxygenation. Am J Physiol 1973; 224: 1032–6.Google Scholar

Guiang, SF 3rd, Widness, JA, Flanagan, KB, et al. The relationship between fetal arterial oxygen saturation and heart and skeletal muscle myoglobin concentrations in the ovine fetus. J Dev Physiol 1993; 19: 99–104.Google Scholar

Reuss, ML, Rudolph, AM, Heymann, MA. Selective distribution of microspheres injected into the umbilical veins and inferior venae cavae of fetal sheep. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981; 141: 427–32.Google Scholar

Wilkening, RB, Meschia, G. Fetal oxygen uptake, oxygenation, and acid-base balance as a function of uterine blood flow. Am J Physiol 1983; 244: H749–55.Google Scholar

Giussani, DA, Spencer, JA, Moore, PJ, et al. Afferent and efferent components of the cardiovascular reflex responses to acute hypoxia in term fetal sheep. J Physiol 1993; 461: 431–49.Google Scholar

Peeters, LL, Sheldon, RE, Jones, MD Jr, et al. Blood flow to fetal organs as a function of arterial oxygen content. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979; 135: 637–46.Google Scholar

Green, LR, Bennet, L, Hanson, MA. The role of nitric oxide synthesis in cardiovascular responses to acute hypoxia in the late gestation sheep fetus. J Physiol 1996; 497: 271–7.Google Scholar

Giussani, DA, Spencer, JAD, Hanson, MA. Fetal and cardiovascular reflex responses to hypoxaemia. Fetal Maternal Med Rev 1994; 6: 17–37.Google Scholar

Jensen, A, Garnier, Y, Berger, R. Dynamics of fetal circulatory responses to hypoxia and asphyxia. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1999; 84: 155–72.Google Scholar

Cohn, HE, Sacks, EJ, Heymann, MA, Rudolph, AM. Cardiovascular responses to hypoxemia and acidemia in fetal lambs. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1974; 120: 817–24.Google Scholar

Fletcher, AJ, Gardner, DS, Edwards, CM, et al. Development of the ovine fetal cardiovascular defense to hypoxemia towards full term. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2006; 291: H3023–34.Google Scholar

Itskovitz, J, Rudolph, AM. Denervation of arterial chemoreceptors and baroreceptors in fetal lambs in utero. Am J Physiol 1982; 242: H916–20.Google Scholar

Giussani, DA, McGarrigle, HH, Spencer, JA, et al. Effect of carotid denervation on plasma vasopressin levels during acute hypoxia in the late-gestation sheep fetus. J Physiol 1994; 477: 81–7.Google Scholar

Bartelds, B, van Bel, F, Teitel, DF, Rudolph, AM. Carotid, not aortic, chemoreceptors mediate the fetal cardiovascular response to acute hypoxemia in lambs. Pediatr Res 1993; 34: 51–5.Google Scholar

Jensen, A, Hanson, MA. Circulatory responses to acute asphyxia in intact and chemodenervated fetal sheep near term. Reprod Fertil Dev 1995; 7: 1351–9.Google Scholar

Barcroft, J. Researches in Prenatal Life. London: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1946.Google Scholar

Caldeyro-Barcia, R, Medez-Bauer, C, Poseiro, J, et al. Control of the human fetal heart rate during labour. In Cassels, D, ed., The Heart and Circulation in the Newborn and Infant. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1966: 7–36.Google Scholar

Hanson, MA. Do we now understand the control of the fetal circulation? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1997; 75: 55–61.Google Scholar

Dawes, GS. The central control of fetal breathing and skeletal muscle movements. J Physiol 1984; 346: 1–18.Google Scholar

Gluckman, PD, Johnston, BM. Lesions in the upper lateral pons abolish the hypoxic depression of breathing in unanaesthetized fetal lambs in utero. J Physiol 1987; 382: 373–83.Google Scholar

Koos, BJ, Chau, A, Matsuura, M, et al. Thalamic locus mediates hypoxic inhibition of breathing in fetal sheep. J Neurophysiol 1998; 79: 2383–93.Google Scholar

Natale, R, Clewlow, F, Dawes, GS. Measurement of fetal forelimb movements in the lamb in utero. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981; 140: 545–51.Google Scholar

Richardson, BS. The effect of behavioral state on fetal metabolism and blood flow circulation. Semin Perinatol 1992; 16: 227–33.Google Scholar

Iwamoto, HS, Rudolph, AM, Mirkin, BL, Keil, LC. Circulatory and humoral responses of sympathectomized fetal sheep to hypoxemia. Am J Physiol 1983; 245: H767–72.Google Scholar

Reuss, ML, Parer, JT, Harris, JL, Krueger, TR. Hemodynamic effects of alpha-adrenergic blockade during hypoxia in fetal sheep. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 142: 410–5.Google Scholar

Giussani, DA, Riquelme, RA, Sanhueza, EM, et al. Adrenergic and vasopressinergic contributions to the cardiovascular response to acute hypoxemia in the llama fetus. J Physiol 1999; 515: 233–41.Google Scholar

Green, LR, McGarrigle, HH, Bennet, L, Hanson, MA. Angiotensin II and cardiovascular chemoreflex responses to acute hypoxia in late gestation fetal sheep. J Physiol 1998; 507: 857–67.Google Scholar

Jensen, EC, Bennet, L, Fraser, M, et al. Adenosine A1 receptor mediated suppression of adrenal activity in near-term fetal sheep. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2010; 298: R700–6.Google Scholar

Tangalakis, K, Lumbers, ER, Moritz, KM, et al. Effect of cortisol on blood pressure and vascular reactivity in the ovine fetus. Exp Physiol 1992; 77: 709–17.Google Scholar

Comline, RS, Silver, IA, Silver, M. Factors responsible for the stimulation of the adrenal medulla during asphyxia in the foetal lamb. J Physiol 1965; 178: 211–38.Google Scholar

Cheung, CY. Direct adrenal medullary catecholamine response to hypoxia in fetal sheep. J Neurochem 1989; 52: 148–53.Google Scholar

Richardson, BS, Bocking, AD. Metabolic and circulatory adaptations to chronic hypoxia in the fetus. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 1998; 119: 717–23.Google Scholar

Danielson, L, McMillen, IC, Dyer, JL, Morrison, JL. Restriction of placental growth results in greater hypotensive response to alpha-adrenergic blockade in fetal sheep during late gestation. J Physiol 2005; 563: 611–20.Google Scholar

Kitanaka, T, Alonso, JG, Gilbert, RD, et al. Fetal responses to long-term hypoxemia in sheep. Am J Physiol 1989; 256: R1348–54.Google Scholar

Gleason, CA, Hamm, C, Jones, MD Jr. Effect of acute hypoxemia on brain blood flow and oxygen metabolism in immature fetal sheep. Am J Physiol 1990; 258: H1064–9.Google Scholar

Iwamoto, HS, Kaufman, T, Keil, LC, Rudolph, AM. Responses to acute hypoxemia in fetal sheep at 0.6–0.7 gestation. Am J Physiol 1989; 256: H613–20.Google Scholar

Matsuda, Y, Patrick, J, Carmichael, L, et al. Effects of sustained hypoxemia on the sheep fetus at midgestation: endocrine, cardiovascular, and biophysical responses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 167: 531–40.Google Scholar

Fletcher, AJ, Gardner, DS, Edwards, M, et al. Development of the ovine fetal cardiovascular defense to hypoxemia towards term. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2006; 291: H3023–34.Google Scholar

Jensen, A. The brain of the asphyxiated fetus–basic research. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1996; 65: 19–24.Google Scholar

Shelley, HJ. Glycogen reserves and their changes at birth and in anoxia. Br Med Bull 1961; 17: 137–43.Google Scholar

Drury, PP, Bennet, L, Booth, LC, et al. Maturation of the mitochondrial redox response to profound asphyxia in fetal sheep. PLoS One 2012; 7: e39273.Google Scholar

Bennet, L, Peebles, DM, Edwards, AD, et al. The cerebral hemodynamic response to asphyxia and hypoxia in the near-term fetal sheep as measured by near infrared spectroscopy. Pediatr Res 1998; 44: 951–7.Google Scholar

de Haan, HH, van Reempts, JL, Vles, JS, et al. Effects of asphyxia on the fetal lamb brain. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169: 1493–501.Google Scholar

Parer, JT. Effects of fetal asphyxia on brain cell structure and function: limits of tolerance. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 1998; 119: 711–6.Google Scholar

Jensen, A, Hohmann, M, Kunzel, W. Dynamic changes in organ blood flow and oxygen consumption during acute asphyxia in fetal sheep. J Dev Physiol 1987; 9: 543–59.Google Scholar

Booth, LC, Malpas, SC, Barrett, CJ, et al. Renal sympathetic nerve activity during asphyxia in fetal sheep. Am J Physiol, Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2012; 303: R30–8.Google Scholar

Jensen, A, Hohmann, M, Kunzel, W. Redistribution of fetal circulation during repeated asphyxia in sheep: effects on skin blood flow, transcutaneous PO₂, and plasma catecholamines. J Dev Physiol 1987; 9: 41–55.Google Scholar

Galinsky, R, Jensen, EC, Bennet, L, et al. Sustained sympathetic nervous system support of arterial blood pressure during repeated brief umbilical cord occlusions in near-term fetal sheep. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2014; 306: R787–95.Google Scholar

Mendez-Bauer, C, Poseiro, JJ, Arellano-Hernandez, G, et al. Effects of atropine of the heart rate of the human fetus during labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1963; 85: 1033–53.Google Scholar

Itskovitz, J, LaGamma, EF, Rudolph, AM. Heart rate and blood pressure responses to umbilical cord compression in fetal lambs with special reference to the mechanism of variable deceleration. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983; 147: 451–7.Google Scholar

Baan, J Jr, Boekkooi, PF, Teitel, DF, Rudolph, AM. Heart rate fall during acute hypoxemia: a measure of chemoreceptor response in fetal sheep. J Dev Physiol 1993; 19: 105–11.Google Scholar

de Haan, HH, Gunn, AJ, Williams, CE, et al. Magnesium sulfate therapy during asphyxia in near-term fetal lambs does not compromise the fetus but does not reduce cerebral injury. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 176: 18–27.Google Scholar

Bennet, L, Westgate, JA, Lui, YC, et al. Fetal acidosis and hypotension during repeated umbilical cord occlusions are associated with enhanced chemoreflex responses in near-term fetal sheep. J Appl Physiol 2005; 99: 1477–82.Google Scholar

Wassink, G, Bennet, L, Booth, LC, et al. The ontogeny of hemodynamic responses to prolonged umbilical cord occlusion in fetal sheep. J Appl Physiol 2007; 103: 1311–7.Google Scholar

Giussani, DA, Unno, N, Jenkins, SL, et al. Dynamics of cardiovascular responses to repeated partial umbilical cord compression in late-gestation sheep fetus. Am J Physiol 1997; 273: H2351–60.Google Scholar

Gunn, AJ, Maxwell, L, de Haan, HH, et al. Delayed hypotension and subendocardial injury after repeated umbilical cord occlusion in near-term fetal lambs. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183: 1564–72.Google Scholar

Costa, S, Zecca, E, De Rosa, G, et al. Is serum troponin T a useful marker of myocardial damage in newborn infants with perinatal asphyxia? Acta Paediatr 2007; 96: 181–4.Google Scholar

Parer, JT. The effect of acute maternal hypoxia on fetal oxygenation and the umbilical circulation in the sheep. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1980; 10: 125–36.Google Scholar

Westgate, J, Wassink, G, Bennet, L, Gunn, AJ. Spontaneous hypoxia in multiple pregnancy is associated with early fetal decompensation and greater T wave elevation during brief repeated cord occlusion in near-term fetal sheep. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193: 1526–33.Google Scholar

de Haan, HH, Gunn, AJ, Gluckman, PD. Fetal heart rate changes do not reflect cardiovascular deterioration during brief repeated umbilical cord occlusions in near-term fetal lambs. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 176: 8–17.Google Scholar

Janbu, T, Nesheim, BI. Uterine artery blood velocities during contractions in pregnancy and labour related to intrauterine pressure. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1987; 94: 1150–5.Google Scholar

Li, H, Gudmundsson, S, Olofsson, P. Acute increase of umbilical artery vascular flow resistance in compromised fetuses provoked by uterine contractions. Early Hum Dev 2003; 74: 47–56.Google Scholar

Wiberg, N, Kallen, K, Olofsson, P. Physiological development of a mixed metabolic and respiratory umbilical cord blood acidemia with advancing gestational age. Early Hum Dev 2006; 82: 583–9.Google Scholar

Modanlou, H, Yeh, SY, Hon, EH. Fetal and neonatal acid-base balance in normal and high-risk pregnancies: during labor and the first hour of life. Obstet Gynecol 1974; 43: 347–53.Google Scholar

Peebles, DM, Spencer, JA, Edwards, AD, et al. Relation between frequency of uterine contractions and human fetal cerebral oxygen saturation studied during labour by near infrared spectroscopy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994; 101: 44–8.Google Scholar

Katz, M, Lunenfeld, E, Meizner, I, et al. The effect of the duration of the second stage of labour on the acid-base state of the fetus. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1987; 94: 425–30.Google Scholar

Huch, A, Huch, R, Schneider, H, Rooth, G. Continuous transcutaneous monitoring of fetal oxygen tension during labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1977; 84: 1–39.Google Scholar

Winkler, M, Rath, W. A risk-benefit assessment of oxytocics in obstetric practice. Drug Saf 1999; 20: 323–45.Google Scholar

de Haan, HH, Gunn, AJ, Williams, CE, Gluckman, PD. Brief repeated umbilical cord occlusions cause sustained cytotoxic cerebral edema and focal infarcts in near-term fetal lambs. Pediatr Res 1997; 41: 96–104.Google Scholar

Westgate, JA, Bennet, L, de Haan, HH, Gunn, AJ. Fetal heart rate overshoot during repeated umbilical cord occlusion in sheep. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 97: 454–9.Google Scholar

Westgate, JA, Bennet, L, Brabyn, C, et al. ST waveform changes during repeated umbilical cord occlusions in near-term fetal sheep. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 184: 743–51.Google Scholar

Hokegard, KH, Eriksson, BO, Kjellmer, I, et al. Myocardial metabolism in relation to electrocardiographic changes and cardiac function during graded hypoxia in the fetal lamb. Acta Physiol Scand 1981; 113: 1–7.Google Scholar

Lear, CA, Galinsky, R, Wassink, G, et al. Sympathetic neural activation does not mediate heart rate variability during repeated brief umbilical cord occlusions in near-term fetal sheep. J Physiol 2016; 594:1265–77.Google Scholar

Keunen, H, Blanco, CE, van Reempts, JL, Hasaart, TH. Absence of neuronal damage after umbilical cord occlusion of 10, 15, and 20 minutes in midgestation fetal sheep. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 176: 515–20.Google Scholar

George, S, Gunn, AJ, Westgate, JA, et al. Fetal heart rate variability and brainstem injury after asphyxia in preterm fetal sheep. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2004; 287: R925–33.Google Scholar

Bennet, L, Rossenrode, S, Gunning, MI, et al. The cardiovascular and cerebrovascular responses of the immature fetal sheep to acute umbilical cord occlusion. J Physiol 1999; 517: 247–57.Google Scholar

Bennet, L, Quaedackers, JS, Gunn, AJ, et al. The effect of asphyxia on superior mesenteric artery blood flow in the premature sheep fetus. J Pediatr Surg 2000; 35: 34–40.Google Scholar

Quaedackers, JS, Roelfsema, V, Hunter, CJ, et al. Polyuria and impaired renal blood flow after asphyxia in preterm fetal sheep. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2004; 286: R576–83.Google Scholar

Mallard, EC, Gunn, AJ, Williams, CE, et al. Transient umbilical cord occlusion causes hippocampal damage in the fetal sheep. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 167: 1423–30.Google Scholar

Myers, RE. Experimental models of perinatal brain damage: relevance to human pathology. In Intrauterine Asphyxia and the Developing Fetal Brain. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, 1977: 37–97.Google Scholar

Barkovich, AJ, Sargent, SK. Profound asphyxia in the premature infant: imaging findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1995; 16: 1837–46.Google Scholar

Quaedackers, JS, Roelfsema, V, Heineman, E, et al. The role of the sympathetic nervous system in post-asphyxial intestinal hypoperfusion in the preterm sheep fetus. J Physiol 2004; 557: 1033–44.Google Scholar

Jensen, EC, Bennet, L, Hunter, CJ, et al. Post-hypoxic hypoperfusion is associated with suppression of cerebral metabolism and increased tissue oxygenation in near-term fetal sheep. J Physiol 2006; 572: 131–9.Google Scholar

Bennet, L, Booth, LC, Drury, PP, et al. Preterm neonatal cardiovascular instability: does understanding the fetus help evaluate the newborn? Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2012; 39: 965–72.Google Scholar

Bennet, L, Booth, L, Malpas, SC, et al. Acute systemic complications in the preterm fetus after asphyxia: the role of cardiovascular and blood flow responses. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2006; 33: 291–9.Google Scholar

Soothill, PW, Ajayi, RA, Campbell, S, et al. Fetal oxygenation at cordocentesis, maternal smoking and childhood neuro-development. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1995; 59: 21–4.Google Scholar

Blair, EM, Nelson, KB. Fetal growth restriction and risk of cerebral palsy in singletons born after at least 35 weeks’ gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212(520): e1–7.Google Scholar

Block, BS, Llanos, AJ, Creasy, RK. Responses of the growth-retarded fetus to acute hypoxemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 148: 878–85.Google Scholar

Gardner, DS, Fletcher, AJ, Bloomfield, MR, et al. Effects of prevailing hypoxaemia, acidaemia or hypoglycaemia upon the cardiovascular, endocrine and metabolic responses to acute hypoxaemia in the ovine fetus. J Physiol 2002; 540: 351–66.Google Scholar

Wassink, G, Bennet, L, Davidson, JO, et al. Pre-existing hypoxia is associated with greater EEG suppression and early onset of evolving seizure activity during brief repeated asphyxia in near-term fetal sheep. PLoS One 2013; 8: e73895.Google Scholar

Wassink, G, Galinsky, R, Drury, PP, et al. Does maturity affect cephalic perfusion and T/QRS ratio during prolonged umbilical cord occlusion in fetal sheep? Obstet Gynecol Int 2014; 2014: 314159.Google Scholar

McMillen, IC, Robinson, JS. Developmental origins of the metabolic syndrome: prediction, plasticity, and programming. Physiol Rev 2005; 85: 571–633.Google Scholar

Hawkins, P, Steyn, C, McGarrigle, HH, et al. Effect of maternal nutrient restriction in early gestation on responses of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis to acute isocapnic hypoxaemia in late gestation fetal sheep. Exp Physiol 2000; 85: 85–96.Google Scholar

Bennet, L, Davidson, JO, Koome, M, Gunn, AJ. Glucocorticoids and preterm hypoxic-ischemic brain injury: the good and the bad. J Pregnancy 2012; 2012: 751694.Google Scholar

Koome, ME, Davidson, JO, Drury, PP, et al. Antenatal dexamethasone after asphyxia increases neural injury in preterm fetal sheep. PLoS One 2013; 8: e77480.Google Scholar

Lear, CA, Koome, MM, Davidson, JO, et al. The effects of dexamethasone on post-asphyxial cerebral oxygenation in the preterm fetal sheep. J Physiol 2014; 592: 5493–505.Google Scholar

Heald, A, Abdel-Latif, ME, Kent, AL. Insulin infusion for hyperglycaemia in very preterm infants appears safe with no effect on morbidity, mortality and long-term neurodevelopmental outcome. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012; 25: 2415–8.Google Scholar

LeBlanc, MH, Huang, M, Vig, V, et al. Glucose affects the severity of hypoxic-ischemic brain injury in newborn pigs. Stroke 1993; 24: 1055–62.Google Scholar

Di Renzo, GC, Rosati, A, Sarti, RD, et al. Does fetal sex affect pregnancy outcome? Gend Med 2007; 4: 19–30.Google Scholar

Hurn, PD, Vannucci, SJ, Hagberg, H. Adult or perinatal brain injury: does sex matter? Stroke 2005; 36: 193–5.Google Scholar

Nijboer, CH, Groenendaal, F, Kavelaars, A, et al. Gender-specific neuroprotection by 2-iminobiotin after hypoxia-ischemia in the neonatal rat via a nitric oxide independent pathway. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2007; 27: 282–92.Google Scholar

McCarthy, MM. Estradiol and the developing brain. Physiol Rev 2008; 88: 91–134.Google Scholar

Hussein, MH, Daoud, GA, Kakita, H, et al. The sex differences of cerebrospinal fluid levels of interleukin 8 and antioxidants in asphyxiated newborns. Shock 2007; 28: 154–9.Google Scholar

Dawes, NW, Dawes, GS, Moulden, M, Redman, CWG. Fetal heart rate patterns in term labor vary with sex, gestational age, epidural analgesia, and fetal weight. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 180: 181–7.Google Scholar

Thorngren-Jerneck, K, Herbst, A. Low 5-Minute Apgar score: a population-based register study of 1 million term births. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 98: 65–70.Google Scholar

Mittwoch, U. The elusive action of sex-determining genes: mitochondria to the rescue? J Theor Biol 2004; 228: 359–65.Google Scholar

Greenough, A, Lagercrantz, H, Pool, J, Dahlin, I. Plasma catecholamine levels in preterm infants: effect of birth asphyxia and Apgar score. Acta Paediatr Scand 1987; 76: 54–9.Google Scholar

Bennet, L, Booth, LC, Ahmed-Nasef, N, et al. Male disadvantage? Fetal sex and cardiovascular responses to asphyxia in preterm fetal sheep. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2007; 293: R1280–6.Google Scholar

Joseph, KS, Wilkins, R, Dodds, L, et al. Customized birth weight for gestational age standards: perinatal mortality patterns are consistent with separate standards for males and females but not for blacks and whites. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2005; 5: 3.Google Scholar

Simchen, MJ, Weisz, B, Zilberberg, E, et al. Male disadvantage for neonatal complications of term infants, especially in small-for-gestational age neonates. J Matern Fetal Neona 2014; 27: 839–43.Google Scholar

Jansson, T, Lambert, GW. Effect of intrauterine growth restriction on blood pressure, glucose tolerance and sympathetic nervous system activity in the rat at 3–4 months of age. J Hypertens 1999; 17: 1239–48.Google Scholar

Nomura, RM, Ortigosa, C, Fiorelli, LR, et al. Gender-specific differences in fetal cardiac troponin T in pregnancies complicated by placental insufficiency. Gender Med 2011; 8: 202–8.Google Scholar

Gunn, AJ, Gunn, TR, de Haan, HH, et al. Dramatic neuronal rescue with prolonged selective head cooling after ischemia in fetal lambs. J Clin Invest 1997; 99: 248–56.Google Scholar

Gunn, AJ, Parer, JT, Mallard, EC, et al. Cerebral histologic and electrocorticographic changes after asphyxia in fetal sheep. Pediatr Res 1992; 31: 486–91.Google Scholar

Torvik, A. The pathogenesis of watershed infarcts in the brain. Stroke 1984; 15: 221–3.Google Scholar

Ikeda, T, Murata, Y, Quilligan, EJ, et al. Physiologic and histologic changes in near-term fetal lambs exposed to asphyxia by partial umbilical cord occlusion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 178: 24–32.Google Scholar

Rees, S, Mallard, C, Breen, S, et al. Fetal brain injury following prolonged hypoxemia and placental insufficiency: a review. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol IntegrPhysiol 1998; 119: 653–60.Google Scholar

Mallard, EC, Williams, CE, Johnston, BM, et al. Repeated episodes of umbilical cord occlusion in fetal sheep lead to preferential damage to the striatum and sensitize the heart to further insults. Pediatr Res 1995; 37: 707–13.Google Scholar

Miller, SP, Ramaswamy, V, Michelson, D, et al. Patterns of brain injury in term neonatal encephalopathy. J Pediatr 2005; 146: 453–60.Google Scholar

Cook, CJ, Gluckman, PD, Williams, C, Bennet, L. Precocial neural function in the growth-retarded fetal lamb. Pediatr Res 1988; 24: 600–4.Google Scholar

Stanley, OH, Fleming, PJ, Morgan, MH. Abnormal development of visual function following intrauterine growth retardation. Early Hum Dev 1989; 19: 87–101.Google Scholar

Kramer, MS, Olivier, M, McLean, FH, et al. Impact of intrauterine growth retardation and body proportionality on fetal and neonatal outcome. Pediatrics 1990; 86: 707–13.Google Scholar

Gunn, AJ, Gunn, TR. The “pharmacology” of neuronal rescue with cerebral hypothermia. Early Hum Dev 1998; 53: 19–35.Google Scholar

Gunn, AJ, Bennet, L. Is temperature important in delivery room resuscitation? Semin Neonatol 2001; 6: 241–9.Google Scholar

Lieberman, E, Eichenwald, E, Mathur, G, et al. Intrapartum fever and unexplained seizures in term infants. Pediatrics 2000; 106: 983–8.Google Scholar

Thornhill, J, Asselin, J. Increased neural damage to global hemispheric hypoxic ischemia (GHHI) in febrile but not nonfebrile lipopolysaccharide Escherichia coli injected rats. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 1998; 76: 1008–16.Google Scholar

Low, JA. Intrapartum fetal asphyxia: definition, diagnosis, and classification. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 176: 957–9.Google Scholar

Westgate, JA, Gunn, AJ, Bennet, L, et al. Do fetal electrocardiogram PR-RR changes reflect progressive asphyxia after repeated umbilical cord occlusion in fetal sheep? Pediatr Res 1998; 44: 297–303.Google Scholar

Westgate, JA, Bennet, L, Gunn, AJ. Fetal heart rate variability changes during brief repeated umbilical cord occlusion in near term fetal sheep. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 106: 664–71.Google Scholar

Mallard, EC, Williams, CE, Gunn, AJ, et al. Frequent episodes of brief ischemia sensitize the fetal sheep brain to neuronal loss and induce striatal injury. Pediatr Res 1993; 33: 61–5.Google Scholar

References

MacDorman, MF, Gregory, ECW. Fetal and perinatal mortality: United States, 2013. National Vital Statistics Reports 2015; 64(8).Google Scholar

Gregory, ECW, MacDorman, MF, Martin, JA. Trends in fetal and perinatal mortality in the United States, 2006–2012 (NCHS data brief, no 169), National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD, 2014.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Perinatal and Infant Mortality Statistics: Committee Opinion 167. Washington, DC: ACOG, 1995.Google Scholar

Osterman, MJ, Kochanek, KD, MacDorman, MF, et al. Annual summary of vital statistics: 2012–2013. Pediatrics 2015; 135(6): 1115–25.Google Scholar

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Trends in infant mortality attributable to birth defects: United States, 1980–1995. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1998; 47: 773–8.Google Scholar

Mathews, TJ, MacDorman, MF. Infant mortality statistics from the 2007 period linked birth/infant death data set. National Vital Statistics Reports 2011; 59(6).Google Scholar

Fretts, RC, Boyd, ME, Usher, RH, et al. The changing pattern of fetal death, 1961–1988. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 79: 35–9.Google Scholar

Fretts, RC, Schmittdiel, J, McLean, FH, et al. Increased maternal age and the risk of fetal death. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 953–7.Google Scholar

Naeye, RL. Causes of perinatal mortality in the United States Collaborative Perinatal Project. JAMA 1977; 238: 228–9.Google Scholar

Lammer, EJ, Brown, LE, Anderka, MR, et al. Classification and analysis of fetal deaths in Massachussetts. JAMA 1989; 261: 1757–62.Google Scholar

Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network Writing Group. Causes of death among stillbirths. JAMA 2011; 306: 2459–68.Google Scholar

Grant, A, Elbourne, D. Fetal movement counting to assess fetal well-being. In Chalmers, I, Enkin, M, Keirse, MJNC, eds., Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth. Oxford University Press, 1989:440.Google Scholar

Cotzias, CS, Paterson-Brown, S, Fisk, NM. Prospective risk of unexplained stillbirth in singleton pregnancies at term: population based analysis. BMJ 1999; 319: 282–8.Google Scholar

Manning, FA. Assessment of fetal condition and risk: analysis of single and combined biophysical variable monitoring. Semin Perinatol 1985; 9: 168–83.Google Scholar

Van Woerden, EE, VanGeijn, HP. Heart-rate patterns and fetal movements. In Nijhuis, J, ed., Fetal Behaviour. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992:41.Google Scholar

Antepartum fetal surveillance. ACOG Technical Bulletin Number 188: January 1994. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1994; 44: 289–94.Google Scholar

Huddleston, JF, Sutliff, G, Robinson, D. Contraction stress test by intermittent nipple stimulation. Obstet Gynecol 1984; 63: 669–73.Google Scholar

Braly, P, Freeman, R, Garite, T, et al. Incidence of premature delivery following the oxytocin challenge test. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981; 141:5–8.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Antepartum fetal surveillance (ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 145; replaces ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 9, October 1999). Obstet Gynecol 2014; 124: 182–92Google Scholar

Nageotte, MP, Towers, CV, Asrat, T, et al. The value of a negative antepartum test: contraction stress test and modified biophysical profile. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 84: 231–4.Google Scholar

Freeman, R, Anderson, G, Dorchester, W. A prospective multi-institutional study of antepartum fetal heart rate monitoring. I. Risk of perinatal mortality and morbidity according to antepartum fetal heart rate test results. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 143: 771–7.Google Scholar

Freeman, R, Garite, T, Mondanlou, H, et al. Postdate pregnancy: utilization of contraction stress testing for primary fetal surveillance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981; 140: 128–35.Google Scholar

Druzin, ML, Karver, ML, Wagner, W, et al. Prospective evaluation of the contraction stress test and non-stress tests in the management of post-term pregnancy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1992; 174: 507–12.Google Scholar

Merrill, PM, Porto, M, Lovett, SM, et al. Evaluation of the non-reactive positive contraction stress test prior to 32 weeks: the role of the biophysical profile. Am J Perinatol 1995; 12: 229–37.Google Scholar

Hammacher, K. The clinical significance of cardiotocography. In Huntingford, P, Huter, K, Saling, E, eds., Perinatal Medicine: 1st European Congress, Berlin. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1969:80.Google Scholar

Parer, JT. Fetal heart rate. In Creasy, RK, Resnick, R, eds., Maternal-Fetal Medicine: Principles and Practice, 3rd edn. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1994.Google Scholar

Lemons, JA, Bauer, CR, Oh, W. Very low birth weight outcomes of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network, January 1995 through December 1996. Pediatrics 2001; 107: 1.Google Scholar

Graca, LM, Cardoso, CG, Clode, N, et al. Acute effects of maternal cigarette smoking on fetal heart rate and fetal body movements felt by the mother. J Perinat Med 1991; 19: 385–90.Google Scholar

Lavery, J. Nonstress fetal heart rate testing. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1982; 25: 689–705.Google Scholar

Schifrin, B, Foye, G, Amato, J, et al. Routine fetal heart rate monitoring in the antepartum period. Obstet Gynecol 1979; 54: 21–5.Google Scholar

Miller, DA, Rabello, YA, Paul, RH. The modified biophysical profile: antepartum testing in the 1990s. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 174: 812–7.Google Scholar

Druzin, ML, Fox, A, Kogut, E, et al. The relationship of the nonstress test to gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 153: 386–9.Google Scholar

Dashow, EE, Read, JA. Significant fetal bradycardia during antepartum heart rate testing. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 148: 187–90.Google Scholar

Druzin, ML. Fetal bradycardia during antepartum testing. J Reprod Med 1989; 34:1.Google Scholar

Phelan, JP. The nonstress test: a review of 3000 tests. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981; 139: 7–10.Google Scholar

Brown, VA, Sawers, RS, Parsons, RJ, et al. The value of antenatal cardiotocography in the management of high risk pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1982; 89: 716–22.Google Scholar

Flynn, A, Kelly, J, Mansfield, H, et al. A randomized controlled trial of non-stress antepartum cardiotocography. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1982; 89: 427–33.Google Scholar

Kidd, L, Patel, N, Smith, R. Non-stress antenatal cardiotocography: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1985; 92: 1156–9.Google Scholar

Lumley, J, Lester, A, Anderson, I, et al. A randomised trial of weekly cardiotocography in high risk obstetric patients. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993; 90: 1018–26.Google Scholar

Grivell, RM, Alfirevic, Z, Gyte, GM, Devane, D. Antenatal cardiotocography for fetal assessment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 12: CD007863.Google Scholar

Thornton, JG, Lilford, RJ. Do we need randomised trials of antenatal tests of fetal wellbeing? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993; 100: 197–200.Google Scholar

Schneider, EP, Hutson, JM, Petrie, RH. An assessment of the first decade’s experience with antepartum fetal heart rate testing. Am J Perinatol 1988; 5: 134.Google Scholar

Smith, CV, Phelan, JP, Nguyen, HN, et al. Continuing experience with the fetal acoustic stimulation test. J Reprod Med 1988; 33: 365–8.Google Scholar

Sarno, AP, Bruner, JP. Fetal acoustic stimulation as a possible adjunct to diagnostic ultrasound: a preliminary report. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 76: 668–90.Google Scholar

Tan, KH, Smyth, RD, Wei, X. Fetal vibroacoustic stimulation for facilitation of tests of fetal wellbeing. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 12:CD002963.Google Scholar

Serafini, P, Lindsay, MBJ, Nagey, DA, et al. Antepartum fetal heart rate response to sound stimulation, the acoustic stimulation test. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 148: 41–5.Google Scholar

Divon, MY, Platt, LD, Cantrell, CJ. Evoked fetal startle response: a possible intrauterine neurological examination. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 153: 454–6.Google Scholar

Ohel, G, Simon, A, Linder, N, et al. Anencephaly and the nature of fetal response to vibroacoustic stimulation. Am J Perinatol 1986; 3: 345–6.Google Scholar

Birnholz, JC, Benacerraf, BR. The development of fetal hearing. Science 1983; 148: 41–5.Google Scholar

Crade, M, Lovett, S. Fetal response to sound stimulation: preliminary report exploring use of sound stimulation in routine obstetrical ultrasound examination. J Ultrasound Med 1988; 7: 499–503.Google Scholar

Druzin, ML, Edersheim, TG, Hutson, JM. The effect of vibroacoustic stimulation on the nonstress test at gestational ages of thirty-two weeks or less. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 1476–8.Google Scholar

Pietrantoni, M, Angel, JL, Parsons, MT, et al. Human fetal response to vibroacoustic stimulation as a function of stimulus duration. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 78: 807–11.Google Scholar

Patrick, J, Campbell, K, Carmichael, L, et al. Patterns of gross fetal body movements over 24-hour observation intervals during the last 10 weeks of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 142: 363–71.Google Scholar

Pearson, JF, Weaver, JB. Fetal activity and fetal wellbeing: an evaluation. Br Med J 1976; 1: 1305–7.Google Scholar

Laventhal, NT, Dildy, GA, Belfort, MA. Fetal tachyarrhythmia associated with vibroacoustic stimulation. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 101: 1116–18.Google Scholar

Tan, KH, Sabapathy, A, Wei, X: Fetal manipulation for facilitating tests of fetal wellbeing. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 4: CD003396.Google Scholar

Piyamongkol, W, Trungtawatchai, S, Chanprapaph, P, et al. Comparison of the manual stimulation test and the nonstress test: a randomized controlled trial. J Med Assoc Thai 2006; 89: 1999–2002.Google Scholar

Manning, FA, Snijders, R, Harman, CR, et al. Fetal biophysical profile score. VI. Correlation with antepartum umbilical venous pH. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169: 755–63.Google Scholar

Neldam, S. Fetal movements as an indicator of fetal well being. Dan Med Bull 1983; 30: 274–8.Google Scholar

Moore, TR, Piacquadio, K. A prospective evaluation of fetal movement screening to reduce the incidence of antepartum fetal death. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 160: 1075–80.Google Scholar

Elbourne, D, Grant, A. Study results vary in count-to-10 method of fetal movement screening. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163: 264–5.Google Scholar

Grant, A, Valentin, L, Elbourne, D. Routine formal fetal movement counting and risk of antepartum late death in normally formed singletons. Lancet 1989; 2: 345–9.Google Scholar

Sorokin, Y, Kierker, L. Fetal movement. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1982; 25: 719–34.Google Scholar

Johnson, TR, Jordan, ET, Paine, LL. Doppler recordings of fetal movement. II. Comparison with maternal perception. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 76: 42–3.Google Scholar

Rayburn, W, Barr, M. Activity patterns in malformed fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 142: 1045–8.Google Scholar

Phelan, JP, Kester, R, Labudovich, ML. Nonstress test and maternal glucose determinations. Obstet Gynecol 1982; 60: 437–9.Google Scholar

Druzin, ML, Foodim, J. Effect of maternal glucose ingestion compared with maternal water ingestion on the nonstress test. Obstet Gynecol 1982; 67: 425–6.Google Scholar

Holden, K, Jovanovic, L, Druzin, M, et al. Increased fetal activity with low maternal blood glucose levels in pregnancies complicated by diabetes. Am J Perinatol 1984; 1: 161–4.Google Scholar

Schwartz, RM, Luby, AM, Scanlon, JW, et al. Effect of surfactant on morbidity, mortality and resource use in newborn infants weighing 500–1,500 grams. N Engl J Med 1994; 330: 1476–80.Google Scholar

Draper, J, Field, S, Thomas, H. Women’s views on keeping fetal movement charts. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1986; 93: 334–8.Google Scholar

Mikhail, MS, Freda, MC, Merkatz, RB, et al. The effect of fetal movement counting on maternal attachment to fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 988–91.Google Scholar

Rurak, DW, Gruber, NC. Effect of neuromuscular blockade on oxygen consumption and blood gases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983; 145: 258–62.Google Scholar

Nabhan, AF, Abdelmoula, YA: Amniotic fluid index versus single deepest vertical pocket as a screening test for preventing adverse pregnancy outcome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; 16:CD006593Google Scholar

Inglis, SR, Druzin, ML, Wagner, WE, et al. The use of vibroacoustic stimulation during the abnormal or equivocal biophysical profile. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 82: 371–4.Google Scholar

Vintzileos, AM, Gaffrey, SE, Salinger, IM, et al. The relationship between fetal biophysical profile score and cord pH in patients undergoing cesarean section before the onset of labour. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 70: 196–201.Google Scholar

Manning, F. Fetal assessment by evaluation of biophysical variables: fetal biophysical profile score. In Creasy, R, Resnik, R, eds., Maternal-Fetal Medicine, 3rd edn. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1999.Google Scholar

Manning, FA. Fetal biophysical profile. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1999; 26: 557–77.Google Scholar

Manning, FA, Morrison, I, Lange, IR, et al. Fetal biophysical profile scoring: selective use of the nonstress test. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 156: 709–12.Google Scholar

Kelly, MK, Schneider, EP, Petrikovsky, BM, et al. Effect of antenatal steroid administration on the fetal biophysical profile. J Clin Ultrasound 2000; 28: 224–6.Google Scholar

Deren, O, Karaer, C, Onderoglu, L, et al. The effect of steroids on the biophysical profile and Doppler indices of umbilical and middle cerebral arteries in healthy preterm fetuses. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2001; 99: 72–6.Google Scholar

Lalor, JG, Fawole, B, Alfirevic, Z, Devane, D. Biophysical profile for fetal assessment in high risk pregnancies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008; 1: CD000038Google Scholar

Nageotte, MP, Towers, CV, Asrat, T, et al. Perinatal outcome with the modified biophysical profile. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170: 1672–6.Google Scholar

McCowan, LME, Harding, JE, Stewart, AW, et al. Umbilical artery Doppler studies in small for gestational age babies reflect disease severity. BJOG 2000; 107: 916–25.Google Scholar

Pollack, RN, Divon, MY. Intrauterine growth retardation: diagnosis. In Copel, JA, Reed, KL, eds., Doppler Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. New York: Raven Press, 1995: 171.Google Scholar

Itskovitz, J. Maternal-fetal hemodynamics. In Maulik, D, McNellis, D, eds., Reproductive and Perinatal Medicine (VIII): Doppler Ultrasound Measurement of Maternal-Fetal Hemodynamics. Ithaca, NY: Perinatology Press, 1987: 13.Google Scholar

Morrow, R, Ritchie, K. Doppler ultrasound fetal velocimetry and its role in obstetrics. Clin Perinatol 1989; 16: 771.Google Scholar

Copel, JA, Schlafer, D, Wentworth, R, et al. Does the umbilical artery systolic/diastolic ratio reflect flow or acidosis? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163: 751.Google Scholar

Farine, D, Kelly, EN, Ryan, G, et al. Absent and reversed umbilical artery end-diastolic velocity. In Copel, JA, Reed, KL, eds., Doppler Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. New York: Raven Press, 1995: 187.Google Scholar

Divon, MY, Ferber, A. Evidence-based antepartum fetal testing. Prenat Neonatal Med 2000; 5: 3–8.Google Scholar

Turan, S, Turan, OM, Berg, C, et al. Computerized fetal heart rate analysis, Doppler ultrasound and biophysical profile score in the prediction of acid-base status of growth-restricted fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 30: 750–6.Google Scholar

Alfirevic, Z, Stampalija, T, Gyte, GM. Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 11: CD007529Google Scholar

Alfirevic, Z, Stampalija, T, Gyte, GM: Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in normal pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010; 8: CD001450Google Scholar

Rizzo, G, Arduini, D, Romanini, C. First trimester fetal and uterine Doppler. In Copel, JA, Reed, KL, eds., Doppler Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. New York: Raven Press, 1995: 105.Google Scholar

Signore, C, Freeman, RK, Spong, CY: Antenatal testing: a reevaluation. Executive summary of a Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113:687.Google Scholar

Scifres, CM, Macones, GA: Antenatal testing: benefits and costs. Semin Perinatol 2008; 32: 318.Google Scholar

Kontopoulos, EV, Vintzileos, AM: Condition-specific antepartum fetal testing. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 1546.Google Scholar

References

Hon, EH. The electronic evaluation of the fetal heart rate: preliminary report. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1958; 75(6): 1215–30.Google Scholar

Hon, EH, Hess, OW. Instrumentation of fetal electrocardiography. Science 1957; 125(3247): 553–4.Google Scholar

Benson, RC, et al. Fetal heart rate as a predictor of fetal distress: a report from the collaborative project. Obstet Gynecol 1968; 32(2): 259–66.Google Scholar

Lilien, AA. Term intrapartum fetal death. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1970; 107(4): 595–603.Google Scholar

Jepson, JH. Factors influencing oxygenation in mother and fetus. Obstet Gynecol 1974; 44(6): 906–14.Google Scholar

Quilligan, EJ, Paul, RH. Fetal monitoring: is it worth it? Obstet Gynecol 1975; 45(1): 6–100Google Scholar

Yeh, SY, DIaz, F, Paul, RH. Ten-year experience of intrapartum fetal monitoring in Los Angeles County/University of Southern California Medical Center. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 143(5): 496–500.Google Scholar

MacDonald, D, et al. The Dublin randomized controlled trial of intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 152(5): 524–39.Google Scholar

Parer, JT. Roundtable: Part I. The Dublin trial of fetal heart rate monitoring: the final word? Birth 1986; 13(2): 119–21.Google Scholar

Grant, A, et al. Cerebral palsy among children born during the Dublin randomised trial of intrapartum monitoring. Lancet 1989; 8674(2): 1233–6.Google Scholar

Banta, HD, Thacker, SB. Electronic fetal monitoring. Lessons from a formative case of health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2002; 18(4): 762–70.Google Scholar

Centers for Disease Control. Rates of cesarean delivery–United States, 1991. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1993; 42(15): 285–9.Google Scholar

Chez, BF, Baird, SM. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: where are we now? J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 2011; 25(2): 180–92.Google Scholar

Maso, G, et al. Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring interpretation in labour: a critical appraisal. Minerva Ginecol 2015; 67(1): 65–79.Google Scholar

Redman, C. 45 years of fetal heart rate monitoring in BJOG. BJOG 2015; 122(4): 536.Google Scholar

Little, WJ. On the influence of abnormal parturition, difficult labours, premature birth, and asphyxia neonatorum, on the mental and physical condition of the child, especially in relation to deformities. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1966; 46: 7–22.Google Scholar

Hon, EH. Apparatus for continuous monitoring of the fetal heart rate. Yale J Biol Med 1960; 32(5): 397–9.Google Scholar

Haverkamp, AD, et al. The evaluation of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in high-risk pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1976; 125(3): 310–20.Google Scholar

Parer, JT. Fetal heart-rate monitoring. Lancet 1979; 2(8143): 632–3.Google Scholar

Thacker, SB, Stroup, DF, Peterson, HB. Efficacy and safety of intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring: an update. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 86(4 Pt 1): 613–20.Google Scholar

Larma, JD, et al. Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and the identification of metabolic acidosis and hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197(3): 301.e1–8.Google Scholar

Nelson, KB, et al. Uncertain value of electronic fetal monitoring in predicting cerebral palsy. N Engl J Med 1996; 334(10): 613–8.Google Scholar

Spong, CY. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: another look. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112(3): 506–7.Google Scholar

Grivell, RM, et al. Antenatal cardiotocography for fetal assessment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 9: CD007863.Google Scholar

Finnemore, A, Groves, A. Physiology of the fetal and transitional circulation. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2015; 20(4): 210–6.Google Scholar

Thornburg, KL, Louey, S. Uteroplacental circulation and fetal vascular function and development. Curr Vasc Pharmacol 2013; 11(5): 748–57.Google Scholar

Zhang, L. Uteroplacental circulation and maternal/fetal health. Curr Vasc Pharmacol 2013; 11(5): 543.Google Scholar

Richardson, BS. Fetal adaptive responses to asphyxia. Clin Perinatol 1989; 16(3): 595–611.Google Scholar

Sadovsky, G, Nicolaides, KH. Reference ranges for fetal heart rate patterns in normoxaemic nonanaemic fetuses. Fetal Ther 1989; 4(2–3): 61–8.Google Scholar

Martin, CB, Gingerich, B. Uteroplacental physiology. JOGN Nurs 1976; 5(5 Suppl.):16s–25s.Google Scholar

Anderson, PA, et al. In utero right ventricular output in the fetal lamb: the effect of heart rate. J Physiol 1987; 387: 297–316.Google Scholar

Anderson, PA, et al. The effect of heart rate on in utero left ventricular output in the fetal sheep. J Physiol 1986; 372: 557–73.Google Scholar

National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: research guidelines for interpretation. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Research Planning Workshop. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177(6): 1385–90.Google Scholar

Parer, JT, Ikeda, T, King, TL. The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development report on fetal heart rate monitoring. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114(1): 136–8.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists. Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpretation, and general management principles (ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 106). Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114(1): 192–202.Google Scholar

Soncini, E, et al. Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: evaluation of a standardized system of interpretation for prediction of metabolic acidosis at delivery and neonatal neurological morbidity. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2014; 27(14): 1465–9.Google Scholar

Parer, JT, Ikeda, T. A framework for standardized management of intrapartum fetal heart rate patterns. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197(1): 26.e1–6.Google Scholar

Park, YS, et al. Difference of fetal heart rate accelerations based on 10 and 15 beats per minute. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2010; 36(2): 291–5.Google Scholar

Salamalekis, E, et al. Computerized analysis of fetal heart rate variability using the matching pursuit technique as an indicator of fetal hypoxia during labor. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2006; 19(3): 165–9.Google Scholar

Ross, MG, et al. Correlation of arterial fetal base deficit and lactate changes with severity of variable heart rate decelerations in the near-term ovine fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 208(4): 285.e1–6.Google Scholar

Paul, RH, et al. Clinical fetal monitoring. VII. The evaluation and significance of intrapartum baseline FHR variability. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1975; 123(2): 206–10.Google Scholar

Parer, JT, et al. Fetal acidemia and electronic fetal heart rate patterns: is there evidence of an association? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2006; 19(5): 289–94.Google Scholar

Ozden, S, Demirci, F. Significance for fetal outcome of poor prognostic features in fetal heart rate traces with variable decelerations. Arch Gynecol Obstet 1999; 262(3–4): 141–9.Google Scholar

Pillai, M, James, D. The development of fetal heart rate patterns during normal pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 76(5 Pt 1): 812–6.Google Scholar

Honjo, S, Yamaguchi, M. Umbilical artery blood acid-base analysis and fetal heart rate baseline in the second stage of labor. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2001; 27(5): 249–54.Google Scholar

Reddy, A, Moulden, M, Redman, CW. Antepartum high-frequency fetal heart rate sinusoidal rhythm: computerized detection and fetal anemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 200(4): 407.e1–6.Google Scholar

Egley, C. The clinical significance of intermittent sinusoidal fetal heart rate. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181(4): 1041–2.Google Scholar

Frasch, MG, et al. Correlating multidimensional fetal heart rate variability analysis with acid-base balance at birth. Physiol Meas 2014; 35(12): L1–12.Google Scholar

Uccella, S, et al. Interobserver reliability to interpret intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: does a standardized algorithm improve agreement among clinicians? J Obstet Gynaecol 2015; 35(3): 241–5.Google Scholar

Torres, J, De Vries, R, Low, LK. Consumer information on fetal heart rate monitoring during labor: a content analysis. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 2014; 28(2): 135–43.Google Scholar

Yudkin, PL, et al. Assessing the contribution of birth asphyxia to cerebral palsy in term singletons. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 1995; 9(2): 156–70.Google Scholar

Nelson, KB, Blair, E. Prenatal factors in singletons with cerebral palsy born at or near term. N Engl J Med 2015; 373(10): 946–53.Google Scholar

Macones, GA, et al. The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring: update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112: 661–6.Google Scholar

Skupski, DW, Eglington, GS. Intrapartum fetal stimulation tests: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 100(4): 830.Google Scholar

Lazebnik, N, et al. Response of fetal heart rate to scalp stimulation related to fetal acid-base status. Am J Perinatol 1992; 9(4): 228–32.Google Scholar

East, CE, et al. Vibroacoustic stimulation for fetal assessment in labour in the presence of a nonreassuring fetal heart rate trace. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 1: CD004664.Google Scholar

Westgren, M, et al. Lactate compared with pH analysis at fetal scalp blood sampling: a prospective randomised study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 105(1): 29–33.Google Scholar

East, CE, et al. Intrapartum fetal scalp lactate sampling for fetal assessment in the presence of a non-reassuring fetal heart rate trace. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 5: CD006174.Google Scholar

Garite, TJ, et al. A multicenter controlled trial of fetal pulse oximetry in the intrapartum management of nonreassuring fetal heart rate patterns. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183(5): 1049–58.Google Scholar

Yam, J, Chua, S, Arulkumaran, S. Intrapartum fetal pulse oximetry. I. Principles and technical issues. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2000; 55(3): 163–72.Google Scholar

Bloom, SL, et al. Fetal pulse oximetry and cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2006; 355(21): 2195–202.Google Scholar

Amer-Wahlin, I, et al. Cardiotocography only versus cardiotocography plus ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram for intrapartum fetal monitoring: a Swedish randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2001; 358(9281): 534–8.Google Scholar

Potti, S, Berghella, V. ST waveform analysis versus cardiotocography alone for intrapartum fetal monitoring: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am J Perinatol 2012; 29(8): 657–64.Google Scholar

Salmelin, A, et al. Fetal monitoring with computerized ST analysis during labor: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2013; 92(1): 28–39.Google Scholar

Kessler, J, Moster, D, Albrechtsen, S. Delay in intervention increases neonatal morbidity in births monitored with cardiotocography and ST-waveform analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2014; 93(2): 175–81.Google Scholar

Olofsson, P, et al. A critical appraisal of the evidence for using cardiotocography plus ECG ST interval analysis for fetal surveillance in labor. I. the randomized controlled trials. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2014; 93(6): 556–68.Google Scholar

Westerhuis, ME, et al. Identification of cases with adverse neonatal outcome monitored by cardiotocography versus ST analysis: secondary analysis of a randomized trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2012; 91(7): 830–7.Google Scholar

Belfort, MA, et al. A randomized trial of intrapartum fetal ECG ST-segment analysis. N Engl J Med 2015; 373(7): 632–41.Google Scholar

Neilson, JP. Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) for fetal monitoring during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 5: CD000116.Google Scholar

Sletten, J, Kessler, J. QRS abnormalities of the fetal electrocardiogram, and their implications for ST-interval analysis during labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2015; 94(10): 1128–35.Google Scholar

Stampalija, T, et al. Fetal and maternal heart rate confusion during intra-partum monitoring: comparison of trans-abdominal fetal electrocardiogram and Doppler telemetry. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012; 25(8): 1517–20.Google Scholar

Signorini, MG, Fanelli, A, Magenes, G. Monitoring fetal heart rate during pregnancy: contributions from advanced signal processing and wearable technology. Comput Math Methods Med, 2014; 2014: 707581.Google Scholar

Adam, J. The future of fetal monitoring. Rev Obstet Gynecol 2012; 5: 132e–136e.Google Scholar

Hamilton, EF, Warrick, PA. New perspectives in electronic fetal surveillance. J Perinat Med 2013; 41(1): 83–92.Google Scholar

Chakladar, A, Adams, H. Dangers of listening to the fetal heart at home. BMJ 2009; 339: b4308.Google Scholar

Book contents

Section 2 - Pregnancy, Labor, and Delivery Complications Causing Brain Injury

Summary

Access options

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive