Alberto Alesina and Roberto Perotti, Fiscal Discipline and the Budget Process, 86 am. econ. rev. 401 (1996).

James E. Alt, Three Simple Tests of Ferejohn's Model: Transparency and Accountability in U.S. States (2005) (paper prepared for NYU Colloquium on Law, Economics, and Politics).

David P. Baron, Service-Induced Campaign Contributions and the Electoral Equilibrium, 104 q.j. econ. 45 (1989).

Jill Barshay, “Temporary” Tax Breaks Usually a Permanent Reality, congressional quarterly weekly 2831 (Nov. 15, 2003).

David Baumann, Begin the Endgame, 15 nat'l j. 1126 (2000).

Timothy Besley, Political Selection, 19 j. econ. persp. 43 (2005).

Cheryl D. Block, Congress and Accounting Scandals: Is the Pot Calling the Kettle Black? 82 neb. l. rev. 365 (2003).

Jon R. Blöndal, Budget Reform in OECD Member Countries: Common Trends, 2 oecd j. budgeting 7 (2003).

Willem H. Buiter, Ten Commandments for a Fiscal Rule in the E(M)U, 19 oxf. rev. econ. pol'y 84 (2003).

Karen C. Burke and Grayson M. P. McCouch, Lipstick, Light Beer, and Back-Loaded Savings Accounts, 25 va. tax rev. 1101 (2006).

Marco Buti and Paul van den Noord, Discretionary Fiscal Policy and Elections: The Experience of the Early Years of EMU (OECD Economics Department Working Paper No. 351, 2003).

Marco Buti and Paul van den Noord, Fiscal Policy in EMU: Rules, Discretion, and Political Incentives, 206 eur. comm'n econ. papers (2004).

Jay S. Bybee, Advising the President: Separation of Powers and the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 104 yale l.j. 51 (1994).

Fabio Canova and Paraskevi (Evi) Pappa, The Elusive Costs and the Immaterial Gains of Fiscal Constraints [Innocenzo Gasparini Inst. for Econ. Res. (IGIER), Bocconi Univ. Working Paper No. 295, 2004].

Cary Coglianese, Richard Zeckhauser, and Edward Parson, Seeking Truth for Power: Informational Strategy and Regulatory Policymaking, 89 minn. l. rev. 277 (2004).

Steven P. Croley and William F. Funk, The Federal Advisory Committee Act and Good Government, 14 yale j. on reg. 451 (1997).

Kenneth W. Dam, The American Fiscal Constitution, 44 u. chi. l. rev. 271 (1977).

William G. Dauster, Budget Emergencies, 18 j. legis. 249 (spring 1992).

Bill Dauster, The Day the Senate Died: Budget Measure Weakens Minority, roll call, May 30, 1996, at 5.

Bill Dauster, The Monster That Ate the United States Senate, 18 pub. budgeting & fin. 87 (summer 1998).

Helen Dewar, Stockman Issues Blunt Warning; Budget Agreement Called Vital, wash. post, Apr. 19, 1983, at A1.

Ousmane Doré and Paul R. Masson, Experience with Budgetary Convergence in the WAEMU [Int'l Monetary Fund (IMF) Working Paper No. 02/108, 2002].

Jon Elster, Arguing and Bargaining in Two Constituent Assemblies, 2 u. penn. j. constl. law 345 (2000).

Carl Emmerson, Chris Frayne, and Sarah Love, The Government's Fiscal Rules (The Inst. For Fiscal Stud. Briefing Note No. 16, 2001).

Michael W. Evans, The Budget Process and the “Sunset” Provisions of the 2001 Tax Law, tax notes, Apr. 21, 2003.

Brian Fletcher, Case Comment, Cheney v. United States District Court for the District of Columbia, 28 harv. envtl. l. rev. 605 (2004).

Alan Fram, Washington Today: Whatever Happened to Gramm-Rudman?associated press, Nov. 29, 1991.

Maurice Frankel, Freedom of Information: Some International Characteristics 9 (2001) (paper from the Campaign for Freedom of Information).

William G. Gale and Peter R. Orszag, An Economic Assessment of Tax Policy in the Bush Administration, 2001–2004, 45 b.c. l. rev. 1157 (2004).

William G. Gale and Peter R. Orszag, Sunsets in the Tax Code, 99 tax notes 1553 (2003).

Elizabeth Garrett, Harnessing Politics: The Dynamics of Offset Requirements in the Tax Legislative Process, 65 u. chi. l. rev. 501 (1998).

Elizabeth Garrett, Rethinking the Structures of Decisionmaking in the Federal Budget Process, 35 harv. j. on legis. 387 (1998).

Elizabeth Garrett, The Congressional Budget Process: Strengthening the Party-in-Government, 100 colum. l. rev. 702 (2000).

Elizabeth Garrett, Attention to Context in Statutory Interpretation: Applying the Lessons of Dynamic Statutory Interpretation to Omnibus Legislation, inissues in legal scholarship 9 (Robert Cooter, Daniel Farber, Philip Frickey, and James Gordley eds., 2002), available at http://www.bepress.com/ils/iss3/art1.

Elizabeth Garrett, The Purposes of Framework Legislation, 14 J. contemp. legal iss. 717 (2005).

Heidi Glenn, Frenzel Criticizes Sunshine Law Governing Tax Panel, tax notes 1126, Nov. 28, 2005.

Heidi Glenn, Perspectives on Tax Reform From Connie Mack, tax notes 26, Jan. 9, 2006.

Michael J. Graetz, Paint by Numbers Tax Lawmaking, 95 colum. l. rev. 609 (1995).

Richard L. Hall and Frank W. Wayman, Buying Time: Moneyed Interests and the Mobilization of Bias in Congressional Committees, 84 am. pol. sci. rev. 797 (1990).

Mark Hallerberg, Rolf R. Strauch, and Jürgen von Hagen, The Use and Effectiveness of Budgetary Rules and Norms in EU Member States (Dutch Ministry of Finance Working Paper, 2001).

Mark Hallerberg, Rolf R. Strauch, and Jürgen von Hagen, Budgeting in Europe After Maastricht: Patterns of Reform and Their Effectiveness, hacienda publica espanola monografia, 2004a, at 201.

Mark Hallerberg, Rolf R. Strauch, and Jürgen von Hagen, The Design of Fiscal Rules and Forms of Governance in European Union Countries, eur. j. pol. econ. (forthcoming).

John C. Harsanyi, Cardinal Utility in Welfare Economics and in the Theory of Risk Taking, 61 j. pol. econ. 434 (1953).

David Heald, Fiscal Transparency: Concepts, Measurement and UK Practice, 81 pub. admin. 723 (2003).

Richard Hemming and Michael Kell, Promoting Fiscal Responsibility – Transparency, Rules and Independent Fiscal Authorities, 3 banca d'italia workshop on fiscal rules 433 (2001).

Andrew Hughes-Hallett, Rolf R. Strauch, and Jürgen von Hagen, Budgetary Consolidations in Europe, 16 j. japanese & int'l econ. 512 (2002).

Otmar Issing, Communication, Transparency, Accountability: Monetary Policy in the Twenty-First Century, fed. res. bank of st. louis rev. 65 (Mar./Apr. 2005).

Andrew Jackson, pocket veto message (Dec. 4, 1833), insen. j. 20, 30 (Dec. 5, 1833).

Suzanne Kennedy and Janine Robbins, The Role of Fiscal Rules in Determining Fiscal Performance (Dept. of Finance Working Paper No. 2001–16, 2001).

George Kopits and Steven A. Symansky, Fiscal Policy Rules (IMF Occasional Paper No. 162, 1998).

Rebecca M. Kysar, The Sun Also Rises: The Political Economy of Sunset Provisions in the Tax Code, 40 ga. l. rev. 335 (2006).

Kanokpan Lao-Arayo, The Effect of Budget Structure on Fiscal Performance: A Study of Selected Asian Countries (IMF Working Paper, 1997).

Robert C. Lowry, James E. Alt, and Karen E. Ferree, Fiscal Policy Outcomes and Electoral Accountability in American States, 92 am. pol. sci. rev. 759 (1998).

Carlos José Fonseca Marinheiro, Has the Stability and Growth Pact Stabilised? Evidence from a Panel of 12 European Countries and Some Implications for the Reform of the Pact (CESifo Working Paper Series No. 1411, 2005).

Dan R. Mastromarco, Improving the Revenue Estimating Process: Introduction to a Series, 105 tax notes 1141 (2004).

Mathew D. McCubbins and Thomas Schwartz, Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrol Versus Fire Alarms, 28 am. j. pol. sci. 165 (1984).

Ellen E. Meade and David Stasavage, Publicity of Debate and the Incentive to Dissent: Evidence from the U.S. Federal Reserve (June 21, 2005) (unpublished paper), available at http://www.nyu.edu/gsas/dept/politics/faculty/stasavage/feddeliberation11.pdf.

Manfred J. M. Neumann, Transparency in Monetary Policy, 4 atlantic econ. j. 353, 358 (2002).

Brendan O'Flaherty and Jagdish Bhagwati, Will Free Trade with Political Science Put Normative Economics Out of Work?, 9 econ. & pol. 207 (1996).

James T. O'Reilly, “Access to Records” Versus “Access to Evil”: Should Disclosure Laws Consider Motives as a Barrier to Records Release?, 12 kan. j.l. & pub. pol'y 559 (2003).

Richard Peach, The Evolution of the Federal Budget and Fiscal Rules, 3 banca d'italia workshop on fiscal rules 217 (2001).

Christopher J. Puckett, Is the Experiment Over? The OMB's Decision to Change the Game Through a Shortening of the Forecast, 11 geo. j. poverty law & pol'y 169 (2004).

Andrea Prat, The Wrong Kind of Transparency, 95 am. econ. rev. 862 (2005).

Teresa Dabán Sánchez, Enrica Detragiache, C. Gabriel di Bella, Gian Maria Milesi-Ferretti, and Steven A. Symansky, Rules-Based Fiscal Policy in France, Germany, Italy, and Spain (IMF Occasional Paper No. 225, 2003).

Alan Schick, The Role of Fiscal Rules in Budgeting, 3 oecd j. on budgeting 8 (2003).

Daniel N. Shaviro, Rethinking Tax Expenditures and Fiscal Language, 57 tax l. rev. 187 (2004).

Marsha Jean Simon, The Real Rules of the Budget Game: Minority Fiscal Decision Making in the United States Senate (June 2005) (unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).

Rolf R. Strauch, Budget Processes and Fiscal Discipline: Evidence from the US States (Zentrum für Europäische Integrationsforschung Bonn Working Paper, 1998).

Joseph E. Stiglitz, On Liberty, the Right to Know, and Public Discourse: The Role of Transparency in Public Life, oxford amnesty lecture 22 (Jan. 27, 1999), available at http://www2.gsb.columbia.edu/faculty/jstiglitz/download/2001_On_Liberty_the_ Right_to_Know_and_Public.pdf.

Kate Stith, Congress' Power of the Purse, 97 yale l.j. 1343 (1988).

Cass R. Sunstein, Government Control of Information, 74 cal. l. rev. 889 (1986).

Dennis F. Thompson, Democratic Secrecy, 114 pol. sci. q. 181 (1999).

Adrian Vermeule, The Constitutional Law of Congressional Procedure, 71 u. chi. l. rev. 361 (2004).

Adrian Vermeule, Introduction: Political Constraints on Supreme Court Reform, 90 minn. l. rev. 1154 (2006).

Adrian Vermeule, Selection Effects in Constitutional Law, 91 va. l. rev. 953 (2005).

Adrian Vermeule, Veil of Ignorance Rules in Constitutional Law, 111 yale l.j. 399 (2001).

Bjorn Volkerink and Jakob de Haan, Fragmented Government Effects on Fiscal Policy: New Evidence, 109 pub. choice 221 (2001).

Jürgen von Hagen, Fiscal Discipline and Growth in Euroland: Experiences with the Stability and Growth Pact (Center for European Integration Studies Working Paper No. B06-2003, 2003).

Jürgen von Hagen, Budgeting Procedures and Fiscal Performance in the European Communities (Commission of the European Communities DG II Economic Papers 96, 1992).

Jürgen von Hagen, Fiscal Rules, Fiscal Institutions, and Fiscal Performance, 33 econ. & social rev. 263 (2002).

Jürgen von Hagen, Fiscal Rules and Fiscal Performance in the European Union and Japan, 24 monetary & econ. stud. 25 (2006).

Jürgen von Hagen and Barry Eichengreen, Fiscal Policy and Monetary Union: Federalism, Fiscal Restrictions, and the No-Bailout Rule (Centre for Econ. Pol'y Res. Discussion Paper No. 1247, 1995).

Jürgen von Hagen and Ian J. Harden, Budget Processes and Commitment to Fiscal Discipline, 39 eur. econ. rev. 771 (1995).

Jürgen von Hagen and Ian H. Harden, National Budget Processes and Fiscal Performance, 3 eur. econ.: rep. & stud. 311 (1994).

Jürgen von Hagen, Andrew Hughes-Hallett, and Rolf R. Strauch, Budgetary Consolidation in EMU, 148 eur. comm'n econ. papers (2001).

The Final Word,congress daily, May 18, 1992.

The Problem Is the Problem, wash. post, July 18, 1984, at A14 (editorial).

Letter from Dan L. Crippen, Congressional Budget Office director, to Hon. John M. Spratt, Jr., ranking Dem. member, House Budget Comm. (Aug. 26, 1999), reprinted intax notes today, Sept. 14, 1999.

European Commission, Specifications on the Implementation of the Stability and Growth Pact and Guidelines on the Format and Content of Stability and Convergence Programs 23 (European Commission DG Economic and Financial Affairs Mimeo, 2002).

European Commission DG Economic and Financial Affairs, 1999–2000 (March, 27, 2007), available athttp://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/about/activities/sgp/year/year19992000_en.htm.

Bruce Ackerman and Ian Ayres, voting with dollars: a new paradigm for campaign finance (2002).

R. Douglas Arnold, the logic of congressional action (1990).

Geoffrey Brennan and James M. Buchanan, the reason of rules (1985).

Richard Briffault, balancing acts: the reality behind state balanced budget amendments (1996).

Anne Brunila and Carlos Martinez-Mongay, The Challenge for Fiscal Policy in the Early Years of EMU, inemu and economic policy in europe: the challenge of the early years 150–169 (Marco Buti and Andre Sapir eds., 2002).

James M. Buchanan and Gordon Tullock, the calculus of consent: logical foundations of constitutional democracy (1962).

Antonio J. Cabral, The Stability and Growth Pact: Main Aspects and Some Considerations on Its Implementation, inthe euro-zone: a new economic entity? (1999).

Robert A. Dahl, a preface to democratic theory (1956).

William G. Dauster, budget process law annotated (1993).

Douglas Dion, turning the legislative thumbscrew: minority rights and procedural change in legislative politics (1997).

Jon Elster, Legislatures as Constituent Assemblies, inthe least examined branch: the role of legislatures in the constitutional state 181 (Richard W. Bauman & Tsvi Kahana eds., 2006).

John Ferejohn, Accountability and Authority: Toward a Theory of Political Accountability, indemocracy, accountability and representation 131 (Adam Przeworski, Susan C. Stokes, and Bernard Manin eds., 1999).

Alan S. Frumin, riddick's senate procedure (1992).

Elizabeth Garrett, Ronald M. Levin, and Theodore Ruger, Constitutional Issues Raised by the 1995 Lobbying Disclosure Act, inthe lobbying manual 143 (W. V. Luneberg and T. M. Susman eds., 3d ed. 2005).

Mark Hallerberg, Rolf Strauch, and Jürgen von Hagen, the use and effectiveness of fiscal norms in the european union (2002).

Mark Hallerberg and Jürgen von Hagen, Electoral Institutions, Cabinet Negotiations, and Budget Deficits in the EU, infiscal institutions and fiscal performance (Jim Poterba and Jürgen von Hagen eds., 1999).

Yianos Kontopoulos and Roberto Perotti, Government Fragmentation and Fiscal Policy Outcomes: Evidence from OECD Countries, infiscal institutions and fiscal performance 81–102 (James M. Poterba and Jürgen von Hagen eds., 1999).

James Madison, the federalist No. 58, (Clinton Rossiter ed., 1961).

Richard Munson, the cardinals of capitol hill; the men and women who control government spending (1993).

Walter J. Oleszek, congressional procedures and the policy process (5th ed., 2001).

Allen Schick, the federal budget: politics, policy, process (2000).

Jürgen Stark, Genesis of a Pact, inthe stability and growth pact: the architecture of fiscal policy in emu 77–105 (Anne Brunila, Marco Buti, and Daniele Franco eds., 2001).

Ernesto Stein, Alejandro Grisanti, and Ernesto Talvi, Institutional Arrangements and Fiscal Performance: The Latin American Experience, infiscal institutions and fiscal performance 103–134 (James M. Poterba and Jürgen von Hagen eds., 1999).

Thomas Stratmann, Logrolling, inperspectives on public choice: a handbook (Dennis C. Mueller ed., 1997).

Andrei Velasco, Debts and Deficits with Fragmented Fiscal Policymaking, infiscal institutions and fiscal performance 37–58 (James M. Poterba and Jürgen von Hagen eds., 1999).

Jürgen von Hagen, Political Economy of Fiscal Institutions, inoxford handbook of political economy 464–478 (Barry R. Weingast and Donald Wittman eds., 2006).

respectfully quoted: a dictionary of quotations, no. 996 (1989).

center on budget and policy priorities, tax cuts: myths and realities (Sept. 27, 2006).

Bowsher v. Synar, 478 U.S. 714 (1986).

City of New Haven, Conn. v. United States, 809 F. 2d 900 (D.C. Cir. 1987).

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Lynn, 501 F.2d 848 (D.C. Cir. 1974).

Federal Open Market Committee v. Merrill, 443 U.S. 340 (1979).

I.N.S. v. Chadha, 462 U.S. 919 (1983).

Merrill v. Federal Open Market Committee of the Federal Reserve, 516 F. Supp. 1028 (1981).

Train v. Campaign Clean Water, Inc., 420 U.S. 136 (1975).

Train v. City of New York, 420 U.S. 35 (1975).

State Highway Comm'n of Missouri v. Volpe, 479 F.2d 1099 (8th Cir. 1973).

The Balanced Budget Amendment: Hearings Before the House Comm. on the Budget, 2. 102d Cong., 2d Sess. 151–152 (1992) (serial no. 42).

128 Cong. Rec. S5506 (May 19, 1982).

127 Cong. Rec. 12,692 (June 17, 1981).

127 Cong. Rec. S6664 (daily ed. June 22, 1981).

131 Cong. Rec. S5863 (May 9, 1985).

131 Cong. Rec. S14,034 (daily ed., Oct. 24, 1985).

135 Cong. Rec. S12,589 (daily ed. Oct. 4, 1989).

136 Cong. Rec. S15,771 (daily ed., Oct. 18, 1990).

139 Cong. Rec. S7920 (daily ed., June 24, 1993).

139 Cong. Rec. S7921 (daily ed. June 24, 1993).

139 Cong. Rec. S10,675–78 (daily ed., Aug. 6, 1993).

141 Cong. Rec. S14,135 (daily ed., Sept. 22, 1995).

141 Cong. Rec. S16,016 (daily ed., Oct. 27, 1995).

142 Cong. Rec. S5415–20 (daily ed., May 21, 1996).

142 Cong. Rec. S5418 (daily ed., May 21, 1996).

142 Cong. Rec. S5516 (daily ed., May 23, 1996).

143 Cong. Rec. S6177–80 (daily ed., June 24, 1997).

143 Cong. Rec. S6291, S6308 (daily ed., June 25, 1997).

146 Cong. Rec. S4172–77 (daily ed., May 18, 2000) (remarks of Sens. Feingold and Wellstone).

147 Cong. Rec. S12, 118 (daily ed., Nov. 29, 2001).

149 Cong. Rec. S13,352–57 (daily ed., Oct. 28, 2003).

149 Cong. Rec. S13,435 (daily ed., Oct. 29, 2003).

151 Cong. Rec. S10,006 (daily ed., Sept. 14, 2005).

151 Cong. Rec. S10,072–73 (daily ed., Sept. 15, 2005).

Adoption of Procedure for Disclosing Policy Decisions by the Federal Open Market Committee, 81 fed. res. bull. 265 (Mar. 1995).

congressional budget office, u.s. cong.,the budget and economic outlook: fiscal years 2007 to 2016 (2006).

congressional budget office, u.s. cong.,the budget and economic outlook: fiscal years 2001–2010 (Jan. 1, 2000).

congressional budget office, u.s. cong.,the budgetary treatment of leases and public/private ventures (Feb. 2003).

congressional budget office, u.s. cong.,how cbo forecasts income (Aug. 2006).

congressional budget office, u.s. cong.,computation of on-budget surplus for fiscal year 2000 (2001).

congressional budget office, u.s. cong.,the uncertainty of budget projections: a discussion of data and methods (Feb. 2003).

Cong. Res. Service, report on tax extenders, RL32367, Doc. 2006–16512 (Aug. 4, 2006).

CRS Appropriations Team, earmarks in appropriation acts: fy1994, fy1996, fy1998, fy2000, fy2002, fy2004, fy2005 (Jan. 26, 2006).

Lewis Deschler, 16 deschler's precedents of the united states house of representatives, H.R. Doc. No. 94–661 (1976).

documentary history of the first federal congress of the united states of america (Charlene Bangs Bickford and Helen E. Veit eds., 1986).

office of mgm't and budget, circular no. a-11, app. a (July 2004).

u.s. gen. accounting office, understanding the primary components of the annual financial report of the united states government, GAO-05–958SP (2005).

Jane G. Gravelle and Maxim Shvedov, Proposed Savings Accounts: Economic and Budgetary Effects, Rep. No. RL32228 incong. res. service report for congress 2–4 (June 30, 2006).

Thomas L. Hungerford, Savings Incentives: What May Work, What May Not, Rep. No. RL33482 incong. res. service report for congress 9–12 (June 20, 2006).

Joint Committee on Taxation, estimated revenue effects of the conference agreement for the “tax increase prevention and reconciliation act of 2005” (May 9, 2006) (JCX-18–06).

Robert Keith, deficit impact of reconciliation legislation enacted in 1990, 1993, and 1997 (Sept. 21, 2005) (CRS rep. no. RS22098).

Robert Keith, submission of the president's budget in transition years (July 31, 2001) (CRS rep. no. RS20752).

Robert Keith, omnibus appropriations acts: overview of recent practices (Apr. 27, 2005) (CRS rep. no. RL32473).

Robert Keith and Bill Heniff Jr., the budget reconciliation process: house and senate procedures (2005) (CRS rep. no. RL33030).

Robert Keith and Allen Schick, introduction to the federal budget process (2004) (CRS rep. no. 98-721).

Donald R. Kennon and Rebecca M. Rogers, the committee on ways and means: a bicentennial history: 1789–1989 (1989) (H. Doc. 244, 100th Cong., 2d Sess.).

Office of Management and Budget, analytical perspectives, budget of the united states government, fiscal year 2007 (2006).

Office of Management and Budget, circular a-11; preparation, submission, and execution of the budget, § 10 (2006).

Office of Management and Budget, Memorandum M-01–17, Memorandum for Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies, Confidentiality of Pre-Decisional Budget Information (Apr. 25, 2001), available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/memoranda/m01–17.html.

President's Advisory Panel on Federal Tax Reform, simple, fair, and pro-growth: proposals to fix america's tax system (2005).

James V. Saturno, emergency spending: statutory and congressional rules (May 11, 2005) (CRS rep. no. RS21035).

James V. Saturno, points of order in the congressional budget process (May 19, 2005) (CRS rep. no. 97–865).

Allen Schick, legislation, appropriations, and budgets: the development of spending decision-making in congress (May 1984) (CRS rep. no. 84–106).

Staff of S. Comm. on Appropriations, 109th Cong., united states senate committee on appropriations; 138th anniversary; 1867–2005 (2005).

Staff of S. Comm. on the Budget, 105th Cong., the congressional budget process; an explanation (1998).

Staff of S. Comm. on the Budget, 108th Cong., budget bulletin, Sept. 17, 2003.

Staff of S. Comm. on Finance, 97th Cong., history of the committee on finance (1981).

The Treasury Department's annual financial report of the united states government.

u.s. dep't of treas., financial report of the united states government (2005).

Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, Pub. L. No. 99–177, tit. II, 99 Stat. 1037, 1038 (1985).

Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Reaffirmation Act of 1987, Pub. L. No. 100–119, tit. I-II, 101 Stat. 754 (1987).

Balanced Budget Act of 1997, Pub. L. No. 105-33, 111 Stat. 251 (1997).

Budget Enforcement Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-508, tit. XIII, 104 Stat. 1388, 1388-573–1388-630 (1990).

12 C.F.R. § 281.1 (2006) 31. Pub. L. No. 104-65, 109 Stat. 691 (1995).

C.F.R. § 102-3.35(a).

C.F.R. § 102-3.160.

41 C.F.R. pt. 102-3, subpt. D, app. A.

41 C.F.R. § 102-3.75, subpt. B, app. A.

Congressional Budget Act § 301(b)(4), 2 U.S.C. § 632(b)(4).

Congressional Budget Act § 310(a), 2 U.S.C. § 641(a).

Congressional Budget Act § 313, 2 U.S.C. § 644.

Defense Authorization Amendments and Base Closure and Realignment Act, Pub. L. No. 100-526, 102 Stat. 2623 (1988).

Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Pub. L. No. 109-171, 120 Stat. 4 (2006).

Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-16, 115 Stat. 38 (2001).

66 Fed. Reg. 37728, 37729, 37740 (July 19, 2001).

Fiscal Responsibility for a Sound Future Act, S. 851, 109th Cong. (introduced Apr. 19, 2005).

H.R. Con. Res. 32, 1st Cong., 1st Sess. (1789).

H.R. Con. Res. 67, 104th Cong., 1st Sess., § 202 (1995).

H.R. Con. Res. 95, 108th Cong., 1st Sess., § 505 (1999).

H.R. Con. Res. 218, 103d Cong., 2d Sess., § 23 (1994).

H.R. Rep. No. 92-1017 (1972), reprinted in 1972 U.S.C.C.A.N. 3491, 3500.

House Rule XI, cl. 2(g)(1).

Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003, Pub. L. No. 108-27, 117 Stat. 752 (2003).

Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003, Pub. L. No. 108-173, 117 Stat. 2066 (2003).

Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993, §§ 13131, 13301–13303, 13901–13971, Pub. L. No. 103-66, 107 Stat. 312 (1993).

Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-193, 110 Stat. 2105 (1996).

Pub. L. No. 67-13, 42 Stat. 20 (codified as amended in scattered sections of 31 U.S.C.).

Pub. L. No. 93-344, 88 Stat. 297 (1974) (codified as amended at 2 U.S.C. §§ 601–688).

Pub. L. No. 101-508, tit. XIII, 104 Stat. 1388, 1388-573–1388-630 (1990) (codified as amended in scattered sections of 2 U.S.C., 15 U.S.C. § 1022, 31 U.S.C §§ 1105, 1341, 1342).

Pub. L. No. 107-90, 115 Stat. 878, 887 (2001).

Senate Standing Rule XVI(4).

Senate Standing Rule XXII(2)

Senate Standing Rule XXVI, ¶ 5(b).

Senate Standing Rule XXX (Dec. 19, 1850).

Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997, Pub. L. No. 105-34, 111 Stat. 788 (1997).

Tax Increase Prevention and Reconciliation Act of 2005, Pub. L. No. 109-222 (2006).

U.S. Const. art. II, § 1, cl. 1.

U.S. Const., art. I, § 5, cl. 3.

2 U.S.C. §601(f).

2 U.S.C. § 1604(b)(2)(B).

5 U.S.C. App. 2. (2006).

31 U.S.C. § 1105(a).

Working Families Tax Relief Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-311, 118 Stat. 1166 (2004).

24 Stat. 373 (1887).

Alberto Alesina and Roberto Perotti, Fiscal Discipline and the Budget Process, 86 am. econ. rev. 401 (1996).

James E. Alt, Three Simple Tests of Ferejohn's Model: Transparency and Accountability in U.S. States (2005) (paper prepared for NYU Colloquium on Law, Economics, and Politics).

David P. Baron, Service-Induced Campaign Contributions and the Electoral Equilibrium, 104 q.j. econ. 45 (1989).

Jill Barshay, “Temporary” Tax Breaks Usually a Permanent Reality, congressional quarterly weekly 2831 (Nov. 15, 2003).

David Baumann, Begin the Endgame, 15 nat'l j. 1126 (2000).

Timothy Besley, Political Selection, 19 j. econ. persp. 43 (2005).

Cheryl D. Block, Congress and Accounting Scandals: Is the Pot Calling the Kettle Black? 82 neb. l. rev. 365 (2003).

Jon R. Blöndal, Budget Reform in OECD Member Countries: Common Trends, 2 oecd j. budgeting 7 (2003).

Willem H. Buiter, Ten Commandments for a Fiscal Rule in the E(M)U, 19 oxf. rev. econ. pol'y 84 (2003).

Karen C. Burke and Grayson M. P. McCouch, Lipstick, Light Beer, and Back-Loaded Savings Accounts, 25 va. tax rev. 1101 (2006).

Marco Buti and Paul van den Noord, Discretionary Fiscal Policy and Elections: The Experience of the Early Years of EMU (OECD Economics Department Working Paper No. 351, 2003).

Marco Buti and Paul van den Noord, Fiscal Policy in EMU: Rules, Discretion, and Political Incentives, 206 eur. comm'n econ. papers (2004).

Jay S. Bybee, Advising the President: Separation of Powers and the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 104 yale l.j. 51 (1994).

Fabio Canova and Paraskevi (Evi) Pappa, The Elusive Costs and the Immaterial Gains of Fiscal Constraints [Innocenzo Gasparini Inst. for Econ. Res. (IGIER), Bocconi Univ. Working Paper No. 295, 2004].

Cary Coglianese, Richard Zeckhauser, and Edward Parson, Seeking Truth for Power: Informational Strategy and Regulatory Policymaking, 89 minn. l. rev. 277 (2004).

Steven P. Croley and William F. Funk, The Federal Advisory Committee Act and Good Government, 14 yale j. on reg. 451 (1997).

Kenneth W. Dam, The American Fiscal Constitution, 44 u. chi. l. rev. 271 (1977).

William G. Dauster, Budget Emergencies, 18 j. legis. 249 (spring 1992).

Bill Dauster, The Day the Senate Died: Budget Measure Weakens Minority, roll call, May 30, 1996, at 5.

Bill Dauster, The Monster That Ate the United States Senate, 18 pub. budgeting & fin. 87 (summer 1998).

Helen Dewar, Stockman Issues Blunt Warning; Budget Agreement Called Vital, wash. post, Apr. 19, 1983, at A1.

Ousmane Doré and Paul R. Masson, Experience with Budgetary Convergence in the WAEMU [Int'l Monetary Fund (IMF) Working Paper No. 02/108, 2002].

Jon Elster, Arguing and Bargaining in Two Constituent Assemblies, 2 u. penn. j. constl. law 345 (2000).

Carl Emmerson, Chris Frayne, and Sarah Love, The Government's Fiscal Rules (The Inst. For Fiscal Stud. Briefing Note No. 16, 2001).

Michael W. Evans, The Budget Process and the “Sunset” Provisions of the 2001 Tax Law, tax notes, Apr. 21, 2003.

Brian Fletcher, Case Comment, Cheney v. United States District Court for the District of Columbia, 28 harv. envtl. l. rev. 605 (2004).

Alan Fram, Washington Today: Whatever Happened to Gramm-Rudman?associated press, Nov. 29, 1991.

Maurice Frankel, Freedom of Information: Some International Characteristics 9 (2001) (paper from the Campaign for Freedom of Information).

William G. Gale and Peter R. Orszag, An Economic Assessment of Tax Policy in the Bush Administration, 2001–2004, 45 b.c. l. rev. 1157 (2004).

William G. Gale and Peter R. Orszag, Sunsets in the Tax Code, 99 tax notes 1553 (2003).

Elizabeth Garrett, Harnessing Politics: The Dynamics of Offset Requirements in the Tax Legislative Process, 65 u. chi. l. rev. 501 (1998).

Elizabeth Garrett, Rethinking the Structures of Decisionmaking in the Federal Budget Process, 35 harv. j. on legis. 387 (1998).

Elizabeth Garrett, The Congressional Budget Process: Strengthening the Party-in-Government, 100 colum. l. rev. 702 (2000).

Elizabeth Garrett, Attention to Context in Statutory Interpretation: Applying the Lessons of Dynamic Statutory Interpretation to Omnibus Legislation, inissues in legal scholarship 9 (Robert Cooter, Daniel Farber, Philip Frickey, and James Gordley eds., 2002), available at http://www.bepress.com/ils/iss3/art1.

Elizabeth Garrett, The Purposes of Framework Legislation, 14 J. contemp. legal iss. 717 (2005).

Heidi Glenn, Frenzel Criticizes Sunshine Law Governing Tax Panel, tax notes 1126, Nov. 28, 2005.

Heidi Glenn, Perspectives on Tax Reform From Connie Mack, tax notes 26, Jan. 9, 2006.

Michael J. Graetz, Paint by Numbers Tax Lawmaking, 95 colum. l. rev. 609 (1995).

Richard L. Hall and Frank W. Wayman, Buying Time: Moneyed Interests and the Mobilization of Bias in Congressional Committees, 84 am. pol. sci. rev. 797 (1990).

Mark Hallerberg, Rolf R. Strauch, and Jürgen von Hagen, The Use and Effectiveness of Budgetary Rules and Norms in EU Member States (Dutch Ministry of Finance Working Paper, 2001).

Mark Hallerberg, Rolf R. Strauch, and Jürgen von Hagen, Budgeting in Europe After Maastricht: Patterns of Reform and Their Effectiveness, hacienda publica espanola monografia, 2004a, at 201.

Mark Hallerberg, Rolf R. Strauch, and Jürgen von Hagen, The Design of Fiscal Rules and Forms of Governance in European Union Countries, eur. j. pol. econ. (forthcoming).

John C. Harsanyi, Cardinal Utility in Welfare Economics and in the Theory of Risk Taking, 61 j. pol. econ. 434 (1953).

David Heald, Fiscal Transparency: Concepts, Measurement and UK Practice, 81 pub. admin. 723 (2003).

Richard Hemming and Michael Kell, Promoting Fiscal Responsibility – Transparency, Rules and Independent Fiscal Authorities, 3 banca d'italia workshop on fiscal rules 433 (2001).

Andrew Hughes-Hallett, Rolf R. Strauch, and Jürgen von Hagen, Budgetary Consolidations in Europe, 16 j. japanese & int'l econ. 512 (2002).

Otmar Issing, Communication, Transparency, Accountability: Monetary Policy in the Twenty-First Century, fed. res. bank of st. louis rev. 65 (Mar./Apr. 2005).

Andrew Jackson, pocket veto message (Dec. 4, 1833), insen. j. 20, 30 (Dec. 5, 1833).

Suzanne Kennedy and Janine Robbins, The Role of Fiscal Rules in Determining Fiscal Performance (Dept. of Finance Working Paper No. 2001–16, 2001).

George Kopits and Steven A. Symansky, Fiscal Policy Rules (IMF Occasional Paper No. 162, 1998).

Rebecca M. Kysar, The Sun Also Rises: The Political Economy of Sunset Provisions in the Tax Code, 40 ga. l. rev. 335 (2006).

Kanokpan Lao-Arayo, The Effect of Budget Structure on Fiscal Performance: A Study of Selected Asian Countries (IMF Working Paper, 1997).

Robert C. Lowry, James E. Alt, and Karen E. Ferree, Fiscal Policy Outcomes and Electoral Accountability in American States, 92 am. pol. sci. rev. 759 (1998).

Carlos José Fonseca Marinheiro, Has the Stability and Growth Pact Stabilised? Evidence from a Panel of 12 European Countries and Some Implications for the Reform of the Pact (CESifo Working Paper Series No. 1411, 2005).

Dan R. Mastromarco, Improving the Revenue Estimating Process: Introduction to a Series, 105 tax notes 1141 (2004).

Mathew D. McCubbins and Thomas Schwartz, Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrol Versus Fire Alarms, 28 am. j. pol. sci. 165 (1984).

Ellen E. Meade and David Stasavage, Publicity of Debate and the Incentive to Dissent: Evidence from the U.S. Federal Reserve (June 21, 2005) (unpublished paper), available at http://www.nyu.edu/gsas/dept/politics/faculty/stasavage/feddeliberation11.pdf.

Manfred J. M. Neumann, Transparency in Monetary Policy, 4 atlantic econ. j. 353, 358 (2002).

Brendan O'Flaherty and Jagdish Bhagwati, Will Free Trade with Political Science Put Normative Economics Out of Work?, 9 econ. & pol. 207 (1996).

James T. O'Reilly, “Access to Records” Versus “Access to Evil”: Should Disclosure Laws Consider Motives as a Barrier to Records Release?, 12 kan. j.l. & pub. pol'y 559 (2003).

Richard Peach, The Evolution of the Federal Budget and Fiscal Rules, 3 banca d'italia workshop on fiscal rules 217 (2001).

Christopher J. Puckett, Is the Experiment Over? The OMB's Decision to Change the Game Through a Shortening of the Forecast, 11 geo. j. poverty law & pol'y 169 (2004).

Andrea Prat, The Wrong Kind of Transparency, 95 am. econ. rev. 862 (2005).

Teresa Dabán Sánchez, Enrica Detragiache, C. Gabriel di Bella, Gian Maria Milesi-Ferretti, and Steven A. Symansky, Rules-Based Fiscal Policy in France, Germany, Italy, and Spain (IMF Occasional Paper No. 225, 2003).

Alan Schick, The Role of Fiscal Rules in Budgeting, 3 oecd j. on budgeting 8 (2003).

Daniel N. Shaviro, Rethinking Tax Expenditures and Fiscal Language, 57 tax l. rev. 187 (2004).

Marsha Jean Simon, The Real Rules of the Budget Game: Minority Fiscal Decision Making in the United States Senate (June 2005) (unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).

Rolf R. Strauch, Budget Processes and Fiscal Discipline: Evidence from the US States (Zentrum für Europäische Integrationsforschung Bonn Working Paper, 1998).

Joseph E. Stiglitz, On Liberty, the Right to Know, and Public Discourse: The Role of Transparency in Public Life, oxford amnesty lecture 22 (Jan. 27, 1999), available at http://www2.gsb.columbia.edu/faculty/jstiglitz/download/2001_On_Liberty_the_ Right_to_Know_and_Public.pdf.

Kate Stith, Congress' Power of the Purse, 97 yale l.j. 1343 (1988).

Cass R. Sunstein, Government Control of Information, 74 cal. l. rev. 889 (1986).

Dennis F. Thompson, Democratic Secrecy, 114 pol. sci. q. 181 (1999).

Adrian Vermeule, The Constitutional Law of Congressional Procedure, 71 u. chi. l. rev. 361 (2004).

Adrian Vermeule, Introduction: Political Constraints on Supreme Court Reform, 90 minn. l. rev. 1154 (2006).

Adrian Vermeule, Selection Effects in Constitutional Law, 91 va. l. rev. 953 (2005).

Adrian Vermeule, Veil of Ignorance Rules in Constitutional Law, 111 yale l.j. 399 (2001).

Bjorn Volkerink and Jakob de Haan, Fragmented Government Effects on Fiscal Policy: New Evidence, 109 pub. choice 221 (2001).

Jürgen von Hagen, Fiscal Discipline and Growth in Euroland: Experiences with the Stability and Growth Pact (Center for European Integration Studies Working Paper No. B06-2003, 2003).

Jürgen von Hagen, Budgeting Procedures and Fiscal Performance in the European Communities (Commission of the European Communities DG II Economic Papers 96, 1992).

Jürgen von Hagen, Fiscal Rules, Fiscal Institutions, and Fiscal Performance, 33 econ. & social rev. 263 (2002).

Jürgen von Hagen, Fiscal Rules and Fiscal Performance in the European Union and Japan, 24 monetary & econ. stud. 25 (2006).

Jürgen von Hagen and Barry Eichengreen, Fiscal Policy and Monetary Union: Federalism, Fiscal Restrictions, and the No-Bailout Rule (Centre for Econ. Pol'y Res. Discussion Paper No. 1247, 1995).

Jürgen von Hagen and Ian J. Harden, Budget Processes and Commitment to Fiscal Discipline, 39 eur. econ. rev. 771 (1995).

Jürgen von Hagen and Ian H. Harden, National Budget Processes and Fiscal Performance, 3 eur. econ.: rep. & stud. 311 (1994).

Jürgen von Hagen, Andrew Hughes-Hallett, and Rolf R. Strauch, Budgetary Consolidation in EMU, 148 eur. comm'n econ. papers (2001).

The Final Word,congress daily, May 18, 1992.

The Problem Is the Problem, wash. post, July 18, 1984, at A14 (editorial).

Letter from Dan L. Crippen, Congressional Budget Office director, to Hon. John M. Spratt, Jr., ranking Dem. member, House Budget Comm. (Aug. 26, 1999), reprinted intax notes today, Sept. 14, 1999.

European Commission, Specifications on the Implementation of the Stability and Growth Pact and Guidelines on the Format and Content of Stability and Convergence Programs 23 (European Commission DG Economic and Financial Affairs Mimeo, 2002).

European Commission DG Economic and Financial Affairs, 1999–2000 (March, 27, 2007), available athttp://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/about/activities/sgp/year/year19992000_en.htm.

Bruce Ackerman and Ian Ayres, voting with dollars: a new paradigm for campaign finance (2002).

R. Douglas Arnold, the logic of congressional action (1990).

Geoffrey Brennan and James M. Buchanan, the reason of rules (1985).

Richard Briffault, balancing acts: the reality behind state balanced budget amendments (1996).

Anne Brunila and Carlos Martinez-Mongay, The Challenge for Fiscal Policy in the Early Years of EMU, inemu and economic policy in europe: the challenge of the early years 150–169 (Marco Buti and Andre Sapir eds., 2002).

James M. Buchanan and Gordon Tullock, the calculus of consent: logical foundations of constitutional democracy (1962).

Antonio J. Cabral, The Stability and Growth Pact: Main Aspects and Some Considerations on Its Implementation, inthe euro-zone: a new economic entity? (1999).

Robert A. Dahl, a preface to democratic theory (1956).

William G. Dauster, budget process law annotated (1993).

Douglas Dion, turning the legislative thumbscrew: minority rights and procedural change in legislative politics (1997).

Jon Elster, Legislatures as Constituent Assemblies, inthe least examined branch: the role of legislatures in the constitutional state 181 (Richard W. Bauman & Tsvi Kahana eds., 2006).

John Ferejohn, Accountability and Authority: Toward a Theory of Political Accountability, indemocracy, accountability and representation 131 (Adam Przeworski, Susan C. Stokes, and Bernard Manin eds., 1999).

Alan S. Frumin, riddick's senate procedure (1992).

Elizabeth Garrett, Ronald M. Levin, and Theodore Ruger, Constitutional Issues Raised by the 1995 Lobbying Disclosure Act, inthe lobbying manual 143 (W. V. Luneberg and T. M. Susman eds., 3d ed. 2005).

Mark Hallerberg, Rolf Strauch, and Jürgen von Hagen, the use and effectiveness of fiscal norms in the european union (2002).

Mark Hallerberg and Jürgen von Hagen, Electoral Institutions, Cabinet Negotiations, and Budget Deficits in the EU, infiscal institutions and fiscal performance (Jim Poterba and Jürgen von Hagen eds., 1999).

Yianos Kontopoulos and Roberto Perotti, Government Fragmentation and Fiscal Policy Outcomes: Evidence from OECD Countries, infiscal institutions and fiscal performance 81–102 (James M. Poterba and Jürgen von Hagen eds., 1999).

James Madison, the federalist No. 58, (Clinton Rossiter ed., 1961).

Richard Munson, the cardinals of capitol hill; the men and women who control government spending (1993).

Walter J. Oleszek, congressional procedures and the policy process (5th ed., 2001).

Allen Schick, the federal budget: politics, policy, process (2000).

Jürgen Stark, Genesis of a Pact, inthe stability and growth pact: the architecture of fiscal policy in emu 77–105 (Anne Brunila, Marco Buti, and Daniele Franco eds., 2001).

Ernesto Stein, Alejandro Grisanti, and Ernesto Talvi, Institutional Arrangements and Fiscal Performance: The Latin American Experience, infiscal institutions and fiscal performance 103–134 (James M. Poterba and Jürgen von Hagen eds., 1999).

Thomas Stratmann, Logrolling, inperspectives on public choice: a handbook (Dennis C. Mueller ed., 1997).

Andrei Velasco, Debts and Deficits with Fragmented Fiscal Policymaking, infiscal institutions and fiscal performance 37–58 (James M. Poterba and Jürgen von Hagen eds., 1999).

Jürgen von Hagen, Political Economy of Fiscal Institutions, inoxford handbook of political economy 464–478 (Barry R. Weingast and Donald Wittman eds., 2006).

respectfully quoted: a dictionary of quotations, no. 996 (1989).

center on budget and policy priorities, tax cuts: myths and realities (Sept. 27, 2006).

Bowsher v. Synar, 478 U.S. 714 (1986).

City of New Haven, Conn. v. United States, 809 F. 2d 900 (D.C. Cir. 1987).

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Lynn, 501 F.2d 848 (D.C. Cir. 1974).

Federal Open Market Committee v. Merrill, 443 U.S. 340 (1979).

I.N.S. v. Chadha, 462 U.S. 919 (1983).

Merrill v. Federal Open Market Committee of the Federal Reserve, 516 F. Supp. 1028 (1981).

Train v. Campaign Clean Water, Inc., 420 U.S. 136 (1975).

Train v. City of New York, 420 U.S. 35 (1975).

State Highway Comm'n of Missouri v. Volpe, 479 F.2d 1099 (8th Cir. 1973).

The Balanced Budget Amendment: Hearings Before the House Comm. on the Budget, 2. 102d Cong., 2d Sess. 151–152 (1992) (serial no. 42).

128 Cong. Rec. S5506 (May 19, 1982).

127 Cong. Rec. 12,692 (June 17, 1981).

127 Cong. Rec. S6664 (daily ed. June 22, 1981).

131 Cong. Rec. S5863 (May 9, 1985).

131 Cong. Rec. S14,034 (daily ed., Oct. 24, 1985).

135 Cong. Rec. S12,589 (daily ed. Oct. 4, 1989).

136 Cong. Rec. S15,771 (daily ed., Oct. 18, 1990).

139 Cong. Rec. S7920 (daily ed., June 24, 1993).

139 Cong. Rec. S7921 (daily ed. June 24, 1993).

139 Cong. Rec. S10,675–78 (daily ed., Aug. 6, 1993).

141 Cong. Rec. S14,135 (daily ed., Sept. 22, 1995).

141 Cong. Rec. S16,016 (daily ed., Oct. 27, 1995).

142 Cong. Rec. S5415–20 (daily ed., May 21, 1996).

142 Cong. Rec. S5418 (daily ed., May 21, 1996).

142 Cong. Rec. S5516 (daily ed., May 23, 1996).

143 Cong. Rec. S6177–80 (daily ed., June 24, 1997).

143 Cong. Rec. S6291, S6308 (daily ed., June 25, 1997).

146 Cong. Rec. S4172–77 (daily ed., May 18, 2000) (remarks of Sens. Feingold and Wellstone).

147 Cong. Rec. S12, 118 (daily ed., Nov. 29, 2001).

149 Cong. Rec. S13,352–57 (daily ed., Oct. 28, 2003).

149 Cong. Rec. S13,435 (daily ed., Oct. 29, 2003).

151 Cong. Rec. S10,006 (daily ed., Sept. 14, 2005).

151 Cong. Rec. S10,072–73 (daily ed., Sept. 15, 2005).

Adoption of Procedure for Disclosing Policy Decisions by the Federal Open Market Committee, 81 fed. res. bull. 265 (Mar. 1995).

congressional budget office, u.s. cong.,the budget and economic outlook: fiscal years 2007 to 2016 (2006).

congressional budget office, u.s. cong.,the budget and economic outlook: fiscal years 2001–2010 (Jan. 1, 2000).

congressional budget office, u.s. cong.,the budgetary treatment of leases and public/private ventures (Feb. 2003).

congressional budget office, u.s. cong.,how cbo forecasts income (Aug. 2006).

congressional budget office, u.s. cong.,computation of on-budget surplus for fiscal year 2000 (2001).

congressional budget office, u.s. cong.,the uncertainty of budget projections: a discussion of data and methods (Feb. 2003).

Cong. Res. Service, report on tax extenders, RL32367, Doc. 2006–16512 (Aug. 4, 2006).

CRS Appropriations Team, earmarks in appropriation acts: fy1994, fy1996, fy1998, fy2000, fy2002, fy2004, fy2005 (Jan. 26, 2006).

Lewis Deschler, 16 deschler's precedents of the united states house of representatives, H.R. Doc. No. 94–661 (1976).

documentary history of the first federal congress of the united states of america (Charlene Bangs Bickford and Helen E. Veit eds., 1986).

office of mgm't and budget, circular no. a-11, app. a (July 2004).

u.s. gen. accounting office, understanding the primary components of the annual financial report of the united states government, GAO-05–958SP (2005).

Jane G. Gravelle and Maxim Shvedov, Proposed Savings Accounts: Economic and Budgetary Effects, Rep. No. RL32228 incong. res. service report for congress 2–4 (June 30, 2006).

Thomas L. Hungerford, Savings Incentives: What May Work, What May Not, Rep. No. RL33482 incong. res. service report for congress 9–12 (June 20, 2006).

Joint Committee on Taxation, estimated revenue effects of the conference agreement for the “tax increase prevention and reconciliation act of 2005” (May 9, 2006) (JCX-18–06).

Robert Keith, deficit impact of reconciliation legislation enacted in 1990, 1993, and 1997 (Sept. 21, 2005) (CRS rep. no. RS22098).

Robert Keith, submission of the president's budget in transition years (July 31, 2001) (CRS rep. no. RS20752).

Robert Keith, omnibus appropriations acts: overview of recent practices (Apr. 27, 2005) (CRS rep. no. RL32473).

Robert Keith and Bill Heniff Jr., the budget reconciliation process: house and senate procedures (2005) (CRS rep. no. RL33030).

Robert Keith and Allen Schick, introduction to the federal budget process (2004) (CRS rep. no. 98-721).

Donald R. Kennon and Rebecca M. Rogers, the committee on ways and means: a bicentennial history: 1789–1989 (1989) (H. Doc. 244, 100th Cong., 2d Sess.).

Office of Management and Budget, analytical perspectives, budget of the united states government, fiscal year 2007 (2006).

Office of Management and Budget, circular a-11; preparation, submission, and execution of the budget, § 10 (2006).

Office of Management and Budget, Memorandum M-01–17, Memorandum for Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies, Confidentiality of Pre-Decisional Budget Information (Apr. 25, 2001), available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/memoranda/m01–17.html.

President's Advisory Panel on Federal Tax Reform, simple, fair, and pro-growth: proposals to fix america's tax system (2005).

James V. Saturno, emergency spending: statutory and congressional rules (May 11, 2005) (CRS rep. no. RS21035).

James V. Saturno, points of order in the congressional budget process (May 19, 2005) (CRS rep. no. 97–865).

Allen Schick, legislation, appropriations, and budgets: the development of spending decision-making in congress (May 1984) (CRS rep. no. 84–106).

Staff of S. Comm. on Appropriations, 109th Cong., united states senate committee on appropriations; 138th anniversary; 1867–2005 (2005).

Staff of S. Comm. on the Budget, 105th Cong., the congressional budget process; an explanation (1998).

Staff of S. Comm. on the Budget, 108th Cong., budget bulletin, Sept. 17, 2003.

Staff of S. Comm. on Finance, 97th Cong., history of the committee on finance (1981).

The Treasury Department's annual financial report of the united states government.

u.s. dep't of treas., financial report of the united states government (2005).

Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, Pub. L. No. 99–177, tit. II, 99 Stat. 1037, 1038 (1985).

Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Reaffirmation Act of 1987, Pub. L. No. 100–119, tit. I-II, 101 Stat. 754 (1987).

Balanced Budget Act of 1997, Pub. L. No. 105-33, 111 Stat. 251 (1997).

Budget Enforcement Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-508, tit. XIII, 104 Stat. 1388, 1388-573–1388-630 (1990).

12 C.F.R. § 281.1 (2006) 31. Pub. L. No. 104-65, 109 Stat. 691 (1995).

C.F.R. § 102-3.35(a).

C.F.R. § 102-3.160.

41 C.F.R. pt. 102-3, subpt. D, app. A.

41 C.F.R. § 102-3.75, subpt. B, app. A.

Congressional Budget Act § 301(b)(4), 2 U.S.C. § 632(b)(4).

Congressional Budget Act § 310(a), 2 U.S.C. § 641(a).

Congressional Budget Act § 313, 2 U.S.C. § 644.

Defense Authorization Amendments and Base Closure and Realignment Act, Pub. L. No. 100-526, 102 Stat. 2623 (1988).

Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Pub. L. No. 109-171, 120 Stat. 4 (2006).

Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-16, 115 Stat. 38 (2001).

66 Fed. Reg. 37728, 37729, 37740 (July 19, 2001).

Fiscal Responsibility for a Sound Future Act, S. 851, 109th Cong. (introduced Apr. 19, 2005).

H.R. Con. Res. 32, 1st Cong., 1st Sess. (1789).

H.R. Con. Res. 67, 104th Cong., 1st Sess., § 202 (1995).

H.R. Con. Res. 95, 108th Cong., 1st Sess., § 505 (1999).

H.R. Con. Res. 218, 103d Cong., 2d Sess., § 23 (1994).

H.R. Rep. No. 92-1017 (1972), reprinted in 1972 U.S.C.C.A.N. 3491, 3500.

House Rule XI, cl. 2(g)(1).

Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003, Pub. L. No. 108-27, 117 Stat. 752 (2003).

Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003, Pub. L. No. 108-173, 117 Stat. 2066 (2003).

Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993, §§ 13131, 13301–13303, 13901–13971, Pub. L. No. 103-66, 107 Stat. 312 (1993).

Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-193, 110 Stat. 2105 (1996).

Pub. L. No. 67-13, 42 Stat. 20 (codified as amended in scattered sections of 31 U.S.C.).

Pub. L. No. 93-344, 88 Stat. 297 (1974) (codified as amended at 2 U.S.C. §§ 601–688).

Pub. L. No. 101-508, tit. XIII, 104 Stat. 1388, 1388-573–1388-630 (1990) (codified as amended in scattered sections of 2 U.S.C., 15 U.S.C. § 1022, 31 U.S.C §§ 1105, 1341, 1342).

Pub. L. No. 107-90, 115 Stat. 878, 887 (2001).

Senate Standing Rule XVI(4).

Senate Standing Rule XXII(2)

Senate Standing Rule XXVI, ¶ 5(b).

Senate Standing Rule XXX (Dec. 19, 1850).

Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997, Pub. L. No. 105-34, 111 Stat. 788 (1997).

Tax Increase Prevention and Reconciliation Act of 2005, Pub. L. No. 109-222 (2006).

U.S. Const. art. II, § 1, cl. 1.

U.S. Const., art. I, § 5, cl. 3.

2 U.S.C. §601(f).

2 U.S.C. § 1604(b)(2)(B).

5 U.S.C. App. 2. (2006).

31 U.S.C. § 1105(a).

Working Families Tax Relief Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-311, 118 Stat. 1166 (2004).

24 Stat. 373 (1887).