Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 September 2014
The exercise of the foreign relations power within the constitution
In public international law, the state is a unitary concept, since
The conduct of any State organ shall be considered an act of that State under international law, whether the organ exercises legislative, executive, judicial or any other functions, whatever position it holds in the organization of the State, and whatever its character as an organ of the central Government or of a territorial unit of the State.
But an account of foreign relations law within Commonwealth states must consider the distribution of the foreign relations power between the three primary organs of government – executive, legislature and judiciary. That is the purpose of Part II of this work.
Traditionally the British constitution concentrated the foreign relations power on the executive, as an exercise of the prerogative power of the Crown. The decision to leave the exercise of the foreign relations power with the King at the time of the Bill of Rights 1688 has proved a remarkably durable Grundnorm in the constitutional arrangements of the Anglo-Commonwealth states. The contemporary scope of this principle will fall to be considered in this chapter. But the central proposition of Part II as a whole is that modern Anglo-Commonwealth constitutions have witnessed a considerable redistribution of the foreign relations power towards greater supervision and control both by Parliament and by the courts. This is so both under the largely unwritten constitutions of the United Kingdom and New Zealand and under the largely written constitutions of Australia and Canada. Indeed, for the most part, the developments have not been mandated by constitutional text, but instead represent an important evolution in living constitutional practice. This development has been engendered by two interrelated factors, each of which reflects the impossibility of maintaining a strict distinction between the international and the national spheres. Parliament in each of the relevant Commonwealth states has extended its role in the light of the impact of foreign relations decisions on the domestic polity. At the same time the courts have increasingly reconsidered their deference to the executive in foreign relations matters, especially in cases where the exercise of the foreign relations power has a direct impact on the civil rights of private persons.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.