Ackerman, Bruce. We the People, vol. 1, Foundations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Ackerman, Bruce. We the People, vol. 2, Transformations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Adair, Douglas. “Experience Must Be Our Only Guide.” In Adair, Douglas and Colbourn, Trevor, eds. Fame and the Founding Fathers. Virginia: Institute of Early American History and Culture, 1974.Google Scholar

Adair, Douglas. “‘That Politics May Be Reduced to a Science’: David Hume, James Madison and the Tenth Federalist.” In Adair, Douglas and Colbourn, Trevor, eds. Fame and the Founding Fathers, 93–106. Virginia: Institute of Early American History and Culture, 1974.Google Scholar

Adams, John. “A Defence of the Constitutions of Government of the United States of America.” In The Works of John Adams, vol. 4, 469–588, vol. 5, 3–478. Boston: Charles C. Little and James Brown, 1851.Google Scholar

Adams, John. Declaration of the Rights of the Inhabitants of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. In The Works of John Adams, vol. 4, 213–18. Boston: Charles C. Little and James Brown, 1851.Google Scholar

Adams, John. Novanglus. In The Works of John Adams, vol. 4, 15–177. Boston:Charles C. Little and James Brown, 1851.Google Scholar

Adams, John. The Report of a Constitution or Form of Government for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Preamble. In The Works of John Adams, vol. 4, 219–67. Boston: Charles C. Little and James Brown, 1851.Google Scholar

Adams, John. Thoughts on Government. In The Works of John Adams, vol. 4 , 189–207. Boston: Charles C. Little and James Brown, 1851.Google Scholar

Adams, Samuel. “The Rights of the Colonists: Report of the Committee of Correspondence to the Boston Town Meeting.” In Old South Leaflets, No. 173 (Boston: Directors of the Old South Work, 1906).Google Scholar

Allen, Danielle. Our Declaration: A Reading of the Declaration of Independence in Defense of Equality. New York: Norton 2014.Google Scholar

Amar, Akhil Reed. America’s Unwritten Constitution: The Precedents and Principles We Live By. New York: Basic Books, 2012.Google Scholar

Amar, Akhil Reed. The Bill of Rights: Creation and Reconstruction. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Amar, Akhil Reed. “The Creation, Reconstruction and Interpretation of the Bill of Rights.” In Shain, Barry Alan, ed. The Nature of Rights at the American Founding and Beyond, 163–80. Charlottesville and London: University of Virginia Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Alféri, Pierre. Guillaume d’Ockham: le singulier. Paris: Minuit, 1989.Google Scholar

American Philosophical Society. Aspects of American Liberty, Philosophical, Historical and Political. Philadelphia: The American Philosophical Society ed., 1977.Google Scholar

Anderson, Alexis J. “The Formative Period of First Amendment Theory.” The American Journal of Legal History 24 (1980), 56–75.Google Scholar

Anderson, David. “The Origins of the Press Clause.” University of California Los Angeles Law Review 30 (1983), 455–541.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah. On Revolution. London: Penguin Books, 1990 [1963].Google Scholar

Aristotle, . The Nicomachean Ethics. Revised Oxford translation, vol. 2. Edited by Barnes, Jonathan. Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . Politics. Revised Oxford translation, vol. 2. Edited by Barnes, Jonathan. Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Armitage, David. The Declaration of Independence: A Global History. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Arneil, Barbara. John Locke and America: The Defence of English Colonialism. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Aron, Raymond. Essai sur les libertés. Paris: Hachette, 1998 [1967].Google Scholar

Ashcraft, Richard and Goldsmith, M. M.. “Locke, Revolution Principles and the Formation of Whig Ideology.” The Historical Journal 26, no. 4 (1983), 773–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Assemblée Nationale, Archives parlementaires de 1787 à 1860, vol. 8.Google Scholar

Assemblée Nationale, Rapport d’information fait en application de l’article 145 du réglement, no. 2262 (2010).Google Scholar

Aubenque, Pierre. “La loi chez Aristote.” Archives de Philosophie du Droit 25 (1980), 147–57.Google Scholar

Aubenque, Pierre. Le problème de l’être chez Aristote: essai sur la problématique aristotélicienne. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1962.Google Scholar

Aulard, François Alphonse. Le culte de la raison et le culte de l’être suprême (1793–1794): essai historique. Paris: F. Alcan, 1892.Google Scholar

Aulard, François Alphonse. “Les philosophes et la Révolution.” In Dide, Auguste, ed. La Révolution française: revue historique, 193–203. Paris: Siège de la Société de l’Histoire de la Révolution Française, 1892.Google Scholar

Aumètre, Jacques. “La Révolution: réalisation et révélation de la raison.” In Boulad-Ayoub, Josiane and Aumètre, Jacques, eds. Les Lumières et la Déclaration des droits de l’homme: rupture ou continuité?, 11–29. Québec: Presses de l’Université de Québec, 1990.Google Scholar

Austin, John. How to Do Things with Words? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Azouvi, François. Descartes et la France: histoire d’une passion nationale. Paris: Fayard, 2002.Google Scholar

Azouvi, François and Beyssade, Jean-Marie. “Descartes.” In Raynaud, Philippe et Rials, Stéphane, eds. Dictionnaire de philosophie politique, 155–59. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2003.Google Scholar

Babeuf, Gracchus. Oeuvres de Babeuf, vol. 1, Babeuf avant la révolution. Edited by Daline, V., Saitta, A., and Soboul, A.. Paris: Bibliothèque Nationale, 1977.Google Scholar

Babeuf, Gracchus. Pages choisies de Babeuf. Edited by Dommanget, Maurice. Paris: Armand Colin, 1935.Google Scholar

Casali de Babot, Judith and Salvatierra, Guillermo. “Mably: utopie ou réalisme dans la pensée pré-révolutionnaire?” In Friedemann, Peter, Gauthier, Florence, Malvache, Jean-Luc, and Pepe, Fernanda Mazzani, eds. Colloque Mably: la politique comme science morale, vol. 1, 85–99. Bary: Palomar Casa Editrice, 1995.Google Scholar

Bailyn, Bernard. The Ideological Origins of The American Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Baker, C. Edwin. “Scope of the First Amendment Freedom of Speech.” University of California Law Review 25 (1978), 964–1040.Google Scholar

Baker, Keith Michael. “The Idea of a Declaration of Rights.” In Kley, Dale Van, ed. The French Idea of Freedom: The Old Regime and the Declaration of Rights of 1789,154–98. Stanford University Press, 1994,Google Scholar

Balibar, Étienne. “Dissonances dans la laïcité.” In Nordmann, Charlotte, ed. Le foulard islamique en questions, 5–27. Paris: ed. Amsterdam, 2004.Google Scholar

Balkin, Jack. Living Originalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Barber, Benjamin R. “The Compromised Republic: Public Purposelessness in America.” In Horwitz, Robert H., ed. The Moral Foundations of the American Republic, 19–38. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1979.Google Scholar

Barker, Ernest. “Edmund Burke et la Révolution française.” In Barker, E. et al., eds. La Révolution de 1789 et la pensée moderne, 1–32. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1940.Google Scholar

Barnett, Randy E. “James Madison’s Ninth Amendment.” In Barnett, Randy E., ed. The Rights Retained by the People: The History and Meaning of the Ninth Amendment, 1–49. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Barnett, Randy E. Restoring the Lost Constitution: The Presumption of Liberty. Princeton University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Barny, Roger. Les contradictions de l’idéologie révolutionnaire des droits de l’homme, droit naturel et histoire. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1993.Google Scholar

Barny, Roger. Le droit naturel à l’épreuve de l’histoire: Jean Jacques Rousseau dans la Révolution (débats politiques et sociaux). Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1995.Google Scholar

Barny, Roger. Prélude idéologique à la Révolution française: le rousseauisme avant 1789. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1985.Google Scholar

Barny, Roger. Le triomphe du droit naturel: La constitution de la doctrine révolutionnaire des droits de l’homme (1787–1789). Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1997.Google Scholar

Barret-Kriegel, Blandine. Les droits de l’homme et le droit naturel. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1989.Google Scholar

Barret-Kriegel, Blandine. L’État et les esclaves. Paris, Payot, 1989 [1979].Google Scholar

Beard, Charles. The Economic Interpretation of the Constitution. New York, MacMillan, 1913.Google Scholar

Bebchuk, Lucian and Jackson, Robert, Jr. “Corporate Political Speech: Who Decides?” Harvard Law Review 124 (2010), 83–117.Google Scholar

Becker, Carl. The Declaration of Independence. New York: Vintage Books, 1958.Google Scholar

Benhabib, Seyla. Another Cosmopolitanism. Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Bentham, Jeremy. “Anarchical Fallacies: Being an Examination of the Declaration of Rights Issued during the French Revolution.” In Waldron, Jeremy, ed. Nonsense Upon Stilts: Bentham, Burke and Marx on the Rights of Man, 46–76. London and New York: Methuen, 1987Google Scholar

Berghausen, Mark E. and Albertson, Skylar. “The Rise and Fall of the Separation of Powers.” Northwestern University Law Review 106 (2012), 527–50.Google Scholar

Berlin, Isaiah. , “John Stuart Mill and the Ends of Life.” In Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Berlin, Isaiah. “Two Concepts of Freedom.” In Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford University Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Berns, Walter. “Religion and the Founding Principle.” In Horwitz, Robert H., ed. The Moral Foundations of the American Republic, 178–79. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1979.Google Scholar

Bilder, Mary Sarah. The Transatlantic Constitution: Colonial Legal Culture and the Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Black, Jr., Charles L. “Foreword: State Action, Equal Protection, and California’s Proposition. Harvard Law Review 69 (1967), 69–262.Google Scholar

Bland, Richard. An Inquiry into the Rights of the British Colonies, Intended as an Answer to the Regulations Lately Made concerning the Colonies, and the Taxes Imposed upon Them Considered. Williamsburg: Alexander Purdie & Co., 1766.Google Scholar

Bloch, Ernst. Droit naturel et dignité humaine. Translated by Denis Authier and Jean Lacoste. Paris: Payot, 2002.Google Scholar

Böckenforde, Ernst-Wolfgang. “La naissance de l’État: processus de sécularisation.” In Le droit, l’État, et la constitution démocratique. Translated by Olivier Jouanjan, Willy Zimmer, and Olivier Beaud. Paris: Bruyland LGDJ, 2000.Google Scholar

Bodéüs, Richard. Le philosophe et la cité: recherches sur les rapports entre morale et politique dans la pensée d’Aristote. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1982.Google Scholar

Bodin, Jean. Les six livres de la république. Paris: Jacques du Puys, Librairie Juré, 1576.Google Scholar

Bok, Sissela. Secrets: On the Ethics of Concealment and Revelation. New York: Vintage, 1998.Google Scholar

Bollinger, Lee C. Images of a Free Press. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Boudon, Julien. Les Jacobins: une traduction des principes de Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Paris: LGDJ, 2006.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. Ce que parler veut dire: l’économie des échanges linguistiques. Paris: Fayard, 1982.Google Scholar

Bouretz, Pierre. “Egalité et liberté.” Droits 8 (1988), 71–82.Google Scholar

Bouretz, Pierre. La république et l’universel. Paris: Gallimard, 2000.Google Scholar

Bourgeois, Bernard. “Hegel.” In Raynaud, Philippe and Rials, Stéphane, eds. Dictionnaire de philosophie politique, 267–74. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2003.Google Scholar

Bourgeois, Bernard. Philosophie et droits de l’homme, de Kant à Marx. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1990.Google Scholar

Bourgeois, Bernard. La raison moderne et le droit politique. Paris, Vrin, 2000.Google Scholar

Boutmy, Émile. “La Déclaration des droits de l’homme et du citoyen et M. Jellinek.” Annales des Sciences Politiques 17 (1902), 415–43.Google Scholar

Boutmy, Émile. Etudes de droit constitutionnel: France, Angleterre, Etats-Unis. Paris: Plon, 1888.Google Scholar

Bowen, John R. Why the French Don’t Like Headscarves. Princeton University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

BrennanJr., William. “The Constitution of the United States: Contemporary Ratification.” University of California Davis Law Review 19 (1985), 2–15.Google Scholar

Brest, Paul. “The Fundamental Rights Controversy: The Essential Contradictions of Normative Constitutional Scholarship.” Yale Law Journal 90 (1908–1981), 1063–109.Google Scholar

Burke, Edmund. On Conciliation with America. In The Writings and Speeches of Edmund Burke, vol. 3. Edited by Langford., Paul Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Burke, Edmund. Reflections on the Revolution of France. In The Writings and Speeches of Edmund Burke, vol. 8. Edited by Mitchell, L. G.. Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Burke, Edmund. Second Speech on Conciliation, 16 November 1775. In The Writings and Speeches of Edmund Burke, vol. 3. Edited by Langford, Paul. Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Campbell, Jud. “Natural Rights and the First Amendment.” Yale Law Journal 127 (2017), 246–321.Google Scholar

Cassirer, Ernst. The Question of Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Translated by Peter Gay. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Castoriadis, Cornelius. L’institution imaginaire de la société. Paris: Seuil, 1975.Google Scholar

Canavan, S. J., Francis, . “Thomas Paine.” In Strauss, Leo and Cropsey, Joseph, eds. History of Political Philosophy, 3rd ed., 685–86. University of Chicago Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Cayla, Olivier. “La notion de signification en droit: contribution à une theorie du droit naturel de la communication.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University Paris II, 1992.Google Scholar

Cayla, Olivier. “Rousseau Jean-Jacques, Du contrat social.” In Cayla, Olivier and Halpérin, Jean-Louis, eds. Dictionnaire des grandes oeuvres juridiques, 495–505. Paris: Dalloz, 2008.Google Scholar

Censer, Jack R. and Hunt, Lynn. Liberty, Equality, Fraternity: Exploring the French Revolution. Pennsylvania State University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Chafee, Jr., Zechariah. “Freedom of Speech in Wartime.” Harvard Law Review 32 (1919), 932–73.Google Scholar

Chafee, Jr., Zechariah. Free Speech in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1941.Google Scholar

Chafee, Jr., Zachariah. How Human Rights Got into the Constitution. Boston University Press, 1952.Google Scholar

Cobban, Alfred. The Social Interpretation of the French Revolution. Cambridge University Press, 1964.Google Scholar

Cohen, Joshua. “Freedom of Expression.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 22 (1993), 207–63.Google Scholar

Coisne, Martine and Collin, Jean. “Le droit de réponse dans la communication audiovisuelle.” In Jean-Yves, Dupeux and Alain, Lacabarats, eds. Liberté de la presse et droits de la personne, 17–30. Paris: Dalloz, 1997.Google Scholar

Commager, Henry Steele. The Empire of Reason. New York: Anchor Press and Doubleday, 1977.Google Scholar

Condorcet, Marie-Jean-Antoine-Nicolas de Caritat, Marquis de. Esquisse d’un tableau historique des progrès de l’ésprit humain. Edited by Monique, and Hincker, François. Paris: Editions Sociales, 1966.Google Scholar

Constant, Benjamin. “De la liberté des Anciens comparée à celle des Modernes” [1819]. In Écrits politiques. Edited by Gauchet, Marcel. Paris: Gallimard, 1997.Google Scholar

Constant, Benjamin. Manuscrit des principes. In De la liberté chez les modernes. Edited by Gauchet, Marcel. Paris: Pluriel, 1980.Google Scholar

Corwin, Edward S. “The ‘Higher Law’ Background of American Constitutional Law.” In Barnett, Randy E., ed. The Rights Retained by the People: The History and Meaning of the Ninth Amendment, 67–106. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Courtney, Cecil P. “Burke et les Lumières.” In La Révolution française entre Lumières et Romantisme, 53–64. Cahiers de philosophie politique et juridique, no. 16. Centre de Publications de l’Université de Caen, 1989.Google Scholar

Cowie, Jefferson. The Great Exception: The New Deal and The Limits of American Politics Princeton University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Curry, Thomas. The First Freedoms: Church and State in America to the Passage of the First Amendment. Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert A. “On Removing Certain Impediments to Democracy in the United States.” In Horwitz, Robert H., ed. The Moral Foundations of the American Republic., 234–56. University Press of Virginia, 1979.Google Scholar

DeCew, Judith Wagner. “The Scope of Privacy in Law and Ethics.” Law and Philosophy 5 (1986), 145–73.Google Scholar

Delgado, Richard and Stefancic, Jean. Must We Defend Nazis? Hate Speech, Pornography and the New First Amendment. New York University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Dellannoi, Gil. Éloge de la prudence. Paris: Berg International Editeurs, 1993.Google Scholar

Delannoy, Benjamin. Burke et Kant: interprètes de la Révolution française. Paris: L’Harmattan, 2004.Google Scholar

Dérathé, Robert. Jean-Jacques Rousseau et la pensée politique de son temps. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1950.Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. “Declarations of Independence.” In Negotiations: Interventions and Interviews 1971–2001, 46–54. Stanford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. De la grammatologie. Paris: Minuit, 1967.Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. Otobiographies: l’enseignement de Nietzsche et la politique du nom propre. Paris: Galilée, 1984.Google Scholar

Descartes, René. Discours de la méthode. In Oeuvres et lettres. Collection Bibliothèque de la Pléiade. Paris: Gallimard, 1937.Google Scholar

Dewey, John. Characters and Events: Popular Essays in Social and Political Philosophy, vol. 2. Edited by Ratner., Joseph New York: Henry Holt and Company, 1929.Google Scholar

Dewey, John. “Liberalism and Civil Liberties.” The Social Frontier (February 1936), 137–38.Google Scholar

Dewey, John. Liberalism and Social Action. New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 1935.Google Scholar

Dewey, John. “Philosophy and Democracy.” In Political Writings, 38–47. Edited by Morris, D. and Shapiro, Ian. New York: Hackett, 1993.Google Scholar

Dewey, John. “Philosophies of Freedom.” In On Experience, Nature and Freedom, 271–72. Edited by Bernstein, Richard J.. Indianapolis/New York: Bobbs-Merrill, 1960.Google Scholar

Diamond, Martin. “Ethics and Politics: The American Way.” In Horwitz, Robert H, ed. The Moral Foundations of the American Republic, 39–72. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1979.Google Scholar

Dinan, John J. The American State Constitutional Tradition. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2006.Google Scholar

Drury, S. B. “John Locke: Natural Law and Innate Ideas.” In Ashcraft, Richard, ed. John Locke, Critical Assessments, vol. 2, 84–97. London and New York: Routledge 1991.Google Scholar

Duguit, Léon. Traité de droit constitutionnel, vols. 1 and 2. Paris: Ed. de Boccard, 1921.Google Scholar

Dumont, Louis. Essais sur l’individualisme. Paris: Seuil, 1985.Google Scholar

Dunn, John. Locke. Oxford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Durkheim, Émile. The Division of Labor in Society. Translated by Lewis A. Coser. New York: The Free Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Durkheim, Émile. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Translated by Karen E. Fields. New York: The Free Press 1995.Google Scholar

Durkheim, Émile. Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse: le système totémique en Australie. Paris: F. Alcan, 1912.Google Scholar

Duverger, Maurice. Les constitutions de la France. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1944.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Edelman, Peter B. “Free Press v. Privacy: Haunted by the Ghost of Justice Black.” Texas Law Review 68 (1989–90), 1195–234.Google Scholar

Edling, Max. A Revolution in Favor of Government: Origins of the U.S. Constitution and the Making of the American State. Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Elliot, Jonathan, ed. Debates in Several State Conventions On The Adoption Of The Federal Constitution, 5 vols. US Congress, 1836.Google Scholar

Emerson, Thomas. The System of Freedom of Expression. New York: Random House, 1970.Google Scholar

Emerson, Thomas. “The Affirmative Side of the First Amendment.” Georgia Law Review 15 (1981), 795–849.Google Scholar

Epstein, Richard. “A Taste for Privacy? Evolution and the Emergence of a Naturalistic Ethic.” Journal of Legal Studies 9 (1980), 665–81.Google Scholar

Eskridge, William and Ferejohn, John. A Republic of Statutes: The New American Constitution. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Ewald, William. “Comparative Jurisprudence (I): What Was it Like to Try a Rat?” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 143 (1995), 1898–2251.Google Scholar

Fallon, Jr., Richard. The Nature of Constitutional Rights: The Invention and Logic of Strict Judicial Scrutiny. Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Farber, Daniel A. Retained by the People: The Silent Ninth Amendment and the Constitutional Rights Americans Don’t Know they Have. New York: Basic Books, 2007.Google Scholar

Farrand, Max, ed. The Records of The Federal Convention of 1787. 3 vols. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1911.Google Scholar

Favoureu, Louis. “La Déclaration de 1789 et le juge: une problématique américaine?” La Revue Tocqueville 14 (1993), 147–55Google Scholar

Favoureu, Louis. “La jurisprudence du Conseil constitutionnel et le droit de propriété proclamé par la Déclaration de 1789.” In La Déclaration des droits de l’homme et du citoyen et la jurisprudence. 125–50. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1989.Google Scholar

Favoureu, Louis and Philip, Loïc. Les grandes décisions du Conseil constitutionnel. 10th ed. Paris: Dalloz, 1999.Google Scholar

Faye, Emmanuel. Philosophie et perfection de l’homme: de la Renaissance à Descartes. Paris: Vrin, 1998.Google Scholar

Felcher, Peter L. and Rubin, Edward L.. “Privacy, Publicity, and the Portrayal of Real People by the Media.” Yale Law Journal 88 (1979), 1577–622.Google Scholar

Ferguson, Adam. “Of the Principles of Union among Mankind.” In Schneider, Louis, ed. The Scottish Moralists on Human Nature and Society, 77–89. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Ferry, Jean-Marc. “La rationalisation habermassienne de la prudence.” In Raynaud, Philippe et Rials, Stéphane, eds. Une prudence moderne. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1992.Google Scholar

Ferry, Luc. “Actualité de la querelle de l’Aufklärung et du romantisme.” In La Révolution française entre Lumières et romantisme, 195–209. Cahiers de Philosophie Politique et Juridique, no. 16. Centre de Publications de l’Université de Caen, 1989.Google Scholar

Ferry, Luc. Le droit: la nouvelle querelle des Anciens et des Modernes. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2007.Google Scholar

Ferry, Luc. “Kant.” In Furet, François et Ozouf, Mona, eds. Dictionnaire critique de la Révolution française: interprètes et historiens, 157–64. Paris: Flammarion, 2007.Google Scholar

Ferry, Luc and Renaut, Alain. Philosophie politique 3: des droits de l’homme à l’idée républicaine. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1992.Google Scholar

Ferry, Luc and Renaut, Alain. Système et critique: essais sur la critique de la raison dans la philosophie contemporaine. Bruxelles: Ousia, 1984.Google Scholar

Fichte, Johann Gottlieb. Considérations destinées à rectifier les jugements du public sur la Révolution française, Translated by Jules Barni. Paris: F. Chamerot, 1859.Google Scholar

Fichte, Johann Gottlieb. Foundations of Natural Rights According to the Principles of the Wissenschaftslehre Translated by Michael Baur. Edited by Neuhouser, Frederick. Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Finnis, John. Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Finnis, John. “Natural Law: The Classical Tradition.” In Coleman, Jules L., Himma, Kenneth Einar, and Shapiro, Scott J., eds. The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law, 1–60. Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Fleischacker, Samuel. “Adam Smith’s Reception among the American Founders, 1776–1790.” The William and Mary Quarterly 59 (2002), 897–924.Google Scholar

Forbath, William E. “Constitutional Welfare Rights: A History, Critique, and Reconstruction.” Fordham Law Review 69 (2001), 1821–91.Google Scholar

Forbath, William E. “The New Deal Constitution in Exile.” Duke Law Journal 51 (2001), 165–222.Google Scholar

Franz, Paul. “Unconstitutional and Outlawed Political Parties: A German-American Comparison.” Boston College International and Comparative Law Review 5 (1982), 51–89.Google Scholar

Fraser, Steve. “The Labor Question.” In Fraser, Steve and Gerstle, Gary, eds. The Rise and Fall of the New Deal Order, 1930–1980, 55–84. Princeton University Press,1990.Google Scholar

Frazer, Michael. The Enlightenment of Sympathy. Oxford University Press 2010.Google Scholar

Fried, Charles. Modern Liberty and the Limits of Government. New York: Norton and Company, 2007.Google Scholar

Friedman, Michel. Les droits de réponse. Paris: Editions du Centre de formation et de perfectionnement des journalistes, 1994.Google Scholar

Friedrich, Carl J. and McCloskey, Robert G.. From the Declaration of Independence to the Constitution: The Roots of American Constitutionalism. New York: The Liberal Arts Press, 1954.Google Scholar

Fuller, Timothy. “Jeremy Bentham and James Mill.” In Strauss, Leo and Cropsey, Joseph, ed. History of Political Philosophy. 3rd ed., 710–31. University of Chicago Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Fuller, Timothy. “Thomas Hobbes and Emergent Modernity.” In McLean, Edward, ed. An Uncertain Legacy: Essays on the Pursuit of Liberty, 73–90. Wilmington, DE: Intercollegiate Studies Institute 1997.Google Scholar

Furet, François. “Ancien Régime.” In Furet, François and Ozouf, Mona, eds. Dictionnaire critique de la Révolution française: idées, 39–40. Paris: Flammarion, 1992.Google Scholar

Furet, François. “Babeuf.” In Furet, François and Ouzouf, Mona, eds. Dictionnaire critique de la Révolution française: acteurs, 25–35. Paris: Flammarion, 1992.Google Scholar

Furet, François. “L’idée de république et l’histoire de France au XIXe siècle.” In Furet, François and Ozouf, Mona, eds. Le siècle de l’avènement républicain, 289–312. Paris: Gallimard, 1993.Google Scholar

Furet, François. “Jacobinisme.” In Furet, François and Ouzouf, Mona, eds. Dictionnaire critique de la Révolution française: idées, 241. Paris: Flammarion, 1992.Google Scholar

Furet, François. Penser la Révolution française. 2nd ed. Paris: Gallimard, 1978.Google Scholar

Furet, François. Marx et la Révolution française. Paris: Flammarion, 1986.Google Scholar

Furet, François and Ozouf, Mona, eds. Dictionnaire critique de la Révolution française: acteurs. 2nd ed. Paris: Flammarion, 2007.Google Scholar

Furet, François and Ouzouf, Mona, eds. Dictionnaire critique de la Révolution française: interprètes et historiens. Paris: Flammarion, 2007.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. “Hegel’s Philosophy and Its Aftereffects until Today.” In Reason in the Age of Science,21–37. Translated by Frederick G. Lawrence. Cambridge, MA: MIT University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Vérité et méthode. Translated by Pierre Fruchon, Jean Grondin, and Gilbert Merlio. Paris: Seuil, 1976.Google Scholar

Gardner, James A. Interpreting State Constitutions: A Jurisprudence of Function in a Federal System. University of Chicago Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Gauchet, Marcel. L’avènement de la démocratie, vol. 1, La révolution moderne. Paris: Gallimard, 2007.Google Scholar

Gauchet, Marcel. Le désenchantement du monde: une histoire politique de la religion. Paris: Gallimard, 1985.Google Scholar

Gauchet, Marcel. La religion dans la démocratie. Paris: Gallimard, 1998.Google Scholar

Gauchet, Marcel. La révolution des droits de l’homme. Paris: Gallimard, 1989.Google Scholar

Gauchet, Marcel. La révolution des pouvoirs: la souveraineté, le peuple et la représentation 1789–1799 Paris: Gallimard, 1995.Google Scholar

Gauthier, Florence. Triomphe et mort du droit naturel en Révolution, 1789–1795–1802. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1992.Google Scholar

Geer LeBoutillier, Cornelia. American Democracy and Natural Law. New York: Columbia University Press, 1950.Google Scholar

Gengembre, Gerard. “Burke.” In Furet, François and Ouzouf, Mona, eds. Dictionnaire critique de la Révolution française: interprètes et historiens, 51–61. Paris: Flammarion, 2007.Google Scholar

Gengembre, Gérard. “La Contre-révolution et le refus de la Constitution.” In Troper, Michel and Jaume, Lucien, eds. 1789 et L’Invention de la Constitution, 55–74. Paris: LGDJ and Bruylant, 1994.Google Scholar

Gerber, Scott D. “Whatever Happened to the Declaration of Independence? A Commentary on the Republican Revisionism in the Political Thought of the American Revolution.” Polity 26 (1993), 207–31.Google Scholar

Gerstle, Gary. Liberty and Coercion: The Paradox of American Government from the Founding to the Present. Princeton University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Gewirtz, Paul. “Privacy and Speech.” Supreme Court Review (2001), 139–200Google Scholar

Gierke, Otto Friedrich von. Natural Law and the Theory of Society 1500 to 1800. Translated by Ernest Barker. Cambridge University Press, 1934.Google Scholar

Glendon, Mary Ann. Rights Talk: The Impoverishment of Political Discourse. New York: Free Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Robert, Glennon and Novak, John E. “A Functional analysis of the Fourteenth Amendment ‘State Action’ Requirement.” Supreme Court Review (1976), 221–61.Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Penguin 1990.Google Scholar

Goldsmith, M. M. “Liberty, Luxury and the Pursuit of Happiness.” In Pagden, Antony, ed. The Languages of Political Theory in Early-Modern Europe, 225–52. Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Goldschmidt, Victor. Anthropologie et politique: les principes du système de Rousseau. Paris: Vrin, 1974.Google Scholar

Gordon, Thomas and Trenchard, John. Cato’s Letters, or Essays on Liberty, Civil and Religious, and other Important Subjects. 4 vols. New York: Da Capo Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Gouhier, Henri. Les méditations métaphysiques de Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Paris: Vrin, 1984.Google Scholar

Goyard-Fabre, Simone. “La Déclaration des droits ou le devoir d’humanité: une philosophie de l’espérance.” Droits 8 (1988), 41–54.Google Scholar

Goyard-Fabre, Simone. John Locke et la raison raisonnable. Paris: Vrin, 1986.Google Scholar

Goyard-Fabre, Simone. “Les Lumières ont-elles préparé la Révolution?” La Révolution française entre Lumières et romantisme, 23–43. Cahiers de philosophie politique et luridique, no. 16. Centre de Publications de l’Université de Caen, 1989.Google Scholar

Goyard-Fabre, Simone. Politique et philosophie dans l’oeuvre de Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2001.Google Scholar

Graber, Mark. Transforming Free Speech: The Ambiguous Legacy of Civil Libertarianism. Oakland: University of California Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Greenawalt, Kent. Fighting Words, Individuals, Communties and Liberties of Speech. Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Greenawalt, Kent. “Free Speech Justifications.” Columbia Law Review 89 (1989), 125–29.Google Scholar

Grey, Thomas. “Constitution as Scripture.” Stanford Law Review 37 (1984), 1–25.Google Scholar

Grey, Thomas. “Do We Have an Unwritten Constitution?” Stanford Law Review 27 (1974–75), 703–18.Google Scholar

Gross, Hyman. “The Concept of Privacy.” New York University Law Review 42 (1967), 34–54Google Scholar

Guenée, Bernard. States and Rulers in Later Medieval Europe. Translated by Juliet Vale. Oxford: Blackwell, 1985.Google Scholar

Gusdorf, Georges. Naissance de la conscience romantique au siècle des Lumières. Paris: Payot, 1976.Google Scholar

Gusdorf, Georges. Les révolutions de France et d’Amérique: la violence et la sagesse. Paris: Librairie Académique Perrin, 1988.Google Scholar

Gusdorf, Georges. Les sciences humaines et la pensée occidentale, vol. 8, La conscience révolutionnaire des idéologues. Paris: Payot, 1978.Google Scholar

Haakonssen, Knud. The Science of a Legislator: The Natural Jurisprudence of David Hume and Adam Smith. Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Haarscher, Guy. “Droits de l’homme.” In Raynaud, Philippe and Rials, Stéphane, eds. Dictionnaire de philosophie politique, 190–97. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2003.Google Scholar

Haarscher, Guy. “Paradoxes de la liberté d’expression.” In Haarscher, Guy, ed. Les médias entre droit et pouvoir, 103–14. Brussels: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles, 1995.Google Scholar

Haarscher, Guy. Philosophie des droits de l’homme. 4th ed. Brussels: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles, 1993.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. Between Facts and Norms. Translated by William Rehg. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. De l’éthique de la discussion. Translated by Mark Hunyadi. Paris: Flammarion, 1991.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. Morale et communication. Translated by Christian Bouchindhomme. Paris: Cerf, 1989.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, Theory and Practice. Translated by John Viertel. Boston: Beacon Press, 1973.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. Theory of Communicative Action. Translated by Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Hamburger, Philip. “Constitutional Right of Religious Exemption: An Historical Perspective.” George Washington Law Review 60 (1992), 914–48.Google Scholar

Hamilton, Alexander, Jay, John, and Madison, James. The Federalist. Edited by Carey, George W and McClellan, James. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 2001.Google Scholar

Hamowy, Ronald. “Jefferson and the Scottish Enlightenment: A Critique of Garry Wills’s Inventing America: Jefferson’s Declaration of Independence.” William and Mary Quarterly 36 (1979), 503–23.Google Scholar

Hampson, Norman. Will and Circumstance: Montesquieu, Rousseau and the French Revolution. London: Duckworth, 1983.Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A. “Are There Any Natural Rights?” Philosophical Review 64 (1955), 175–91.Google Scholar

Hartz, Louis. The Liberal Tradition in America. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1955.Google Scholar

Hassner, Pierre. “Georg W. F. Hegel.” In Strauss, Leo and Cropsey, Joseph, eds. History of Political Philosophy. 3rd ed., 732–60. University of Chicago Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Hauriou, Maurice. Précis de droit constitutionnel. Paris: Sirey 1929.Google Scholar

Hayek, Friedrich The Constitution of Liberty. University of Chicago Press, 1960.Google Scholar

Hayek, Friedrich. The Road to Serfdom. University of Chicago Press, 1944.Google Scholar

Hayek, Friedrich. “Social or Distributive Justice.” In Nishiyame, Chiaki, Leube, Kurt R., eds. The Essence of Hayek, 62–99. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. Elements of Philosophy of Right. Translated by H. B. Nisbet. Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. Introduction to the Philosophy of History. Translated by Leo Rauch. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett, 1988.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. Phenomenology of Spirit. Translated by A. V. Miller. Oxford University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. The Philosophy of History. Translated by J. Sibree. New York: Dover, 1956.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. Being and Time. Translated by John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. New York: Harper and Row, 1962.Google Scholar

Henkin, Louis. “Human Dignity and Constitutional Rights.” In Meyer, Michael and Parent, William, eds. The Constitution of Rights: Human Dignity and American Values, 210–28. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Henkin, Louis. “Rights: American and Human.” Columbia Law Review 79 (1979), 405–25.Google Scholar

Heinze, Eric. Hate Speech and Democratic Citizenship. Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Hennette, Vauchez, Stéphanie. Disposer de soi. Paris: L’Harmattan, 2004.Google Scholar

Higonnet, Patrice. Sister Republics: The Origins of French and American Republicanism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Hinsley, F. H. Sovereignty. London: C. A. Watts and Co. Ltd., 1966.Google Scholar

Hirshleifer, Jack. “Privacy: Its Origin, Function and Future.” Journal of Legal Studies 9 (1980), 649–64.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. The Elements of Law: Human Nature and De Corpore Politico. Edited by Gaskin, J. C. A.. Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan. Edited by Tuck, Richard. Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Hofstader, Richard. “The Founding Fathers: An Age of Realism.” In Horwitz, Robert H., ed. The Moral Foundations of the American Republic, 73–85 Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1979.Google Scholar

Holmes, Oliver Wendell. “The Path of the Law.” Harvard Law Review 10 (1897), 457–78.Google Scholar

D’Hondt, Jacques. De Hegel à Marx. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1972.Google Scholar

D’Hondt, Jacques. “Hegel et Napoléon.” In d’Hondt, Jacques, ed. Hegel et les Français,. New York: Georg Olms Verlag Hildesheim, 1998.Google Scholar

D’Hondt, Jacques. “Le Parcours hégélien de la Révolution française.” In d’Hondt, Jacques. Hegel et les Français, 139–54. New York: Georg Olms Verlag Hildesheim, 1998.Google Scholar

Horwitz, Morton J. The Transformation of American Law, 1870–1960. Oxford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Horwitz, Robert. “John Locke and the Preservation of Liberty: A Perennial Problem of Civic Education.” In Horwitz, Robert H., ed. The Moral Foundations of the American Republic, 129–56. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1979.Google Scholar

Howe, Daniel Walker. The Political Culture of the American Whigs. University of Chicago Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Hume, David. “Of the Liberty of the Press.” In Political Essays, 1–3. Edited by Haakonssen, Knud. Cambridge University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hume, David. “That Politics May Be Reduced to a Science.” In Political Essays, 4–15. Edited by Haakonssen, Knud. Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Hutcheson, Francis. A System of Moral Philosophy. London: Continuum, 2005.Google Scholar

Hutson, James H. “The Emergence of the Modern Concept of a Right in America: The Contribution of Michel Villey.” In Shain, Barry Alan, ed. The Nature of Rights at the American Founding and Beyond, 25–42. Charlottesville and London: University of Virginia Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Huyler, Jerome. Locke in America: The Moral Philosophy of The Founding Era. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1995.Google Scholar

Hyppolite, Jean. “La signification de la Révolution française dans la “phénoménologie” de Hegel.” In Barker, E., et al., eds. La Révolution de 1789 et la pensée moderne, 193–224. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1940.Google Scholar

Jainchill, Andrew. Reigmagining Politics after the Terror: The Republican Origins of French Liberalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Jaume, Lucien. “Préface aux droits de l’homme.” In Jaume, Lucien, ed. Les déclarations des droits de l’homme (Du débat 1789–1793 au préambule de 1946), 27–65. Paris: Flammarion, 1989.Google Scholar

Jaume, Lucien. Le discours jacobin et la démocratie. Paris: Fayard, 1989.Google Scholar

Jaume, Lucien. L’individu effacé ou le paradoxe du libéralisme français. Paris: Fayard, 1997.Google Scholar

Jaume, Lucien. La liberté et la loi: les origines philosophiques du libéralisme. Paris: Fayard, 2000.Google Scholar

Jaurès, Jean. Histoire socialiste de la Révolution française. Paris: Jules Rouff, 1900.Google Scholar

Ingber, Stanley. “The Marketplace of Ideas: A Legitimizing Myth.” Duke Law Journal (1984), 1–91.Google Scholar

Issacharoff, Samuel. “On Political Corruption.” Harvard Law Review 124 (2010), 118–42.Google Scholar

Jefferson, Thomas. The Papers of Thomas Jefferson. Edited by Boyd, Julian P., et al. Princeton University Press, 1950.Google Scholar

Jefferson, Thomas. Political Writings. Edited by Appleby, Joyce and Ball, Terence. Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Jefferson, Thomas. The Works of Thomas Jefferson. 12 vols. Edited by Ford, Paul Leicester. New York and London: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1904–5.Google Scholar

Jellinek, Georg, La Déclaration des droits de l’homme et du citoyen: contribution à l’histoire du droit constitutionnel moderne. Translated by Georges Fardis. Paris: Albert Fontemoing, 1902.Google Scholar

Jennings, Jeremy. Revolution and the Republic: A History of Political Thought in France since the Eighteenth Century. Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Jones, H. S. The French State in Question: Public Law and Political Argument in the Third Republic. Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Jouvenel, Bertrand de. De la souveraineté: à la recherche du bien politique. Paris: Génin, Librairie de Médicis, 1955.Google Scholar

Jourard, Sidney. “Some Psychological Aspects of Privacy.” Law and Contemporary Problems 31 (1966), 307–18.Google Scholar

Judt, Tony. “Rights in France.” La Revue Tocqueville 1 (1993), 67–108.Google Scholar

Kahn, Robert. Holocaust Denial and the Law: A Comparative Study. New York: Palgrave, 2004.Google Scholar

Kairys, David, ed. The Politics of the Law. New York: Basic Books, 1998.Google Scholar

Kalven, Harry. The Negro and the First Amendment. University of Chicago Press, 1966.Google Scholar

Kalven, Harry. “The New York Times Case: A Note on the Central Meaning of the First Amendment.” Supreme Court Review (1964), 191–221.Google Scholar

Kammen, Michael. A Machine That Would Go of Itself: The Constitution in American Culture. New York: Knopf, 1987.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. “An Answer to the Question: ‘What is Enlightenment?’” In Political Writings, 54–60. Translated by H. B. Nisbet. Edited by Reiss, H.. Cambridge University Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. “On the Common Saying: ‘This May be True in Theory, but it does not Apply in Practice.’” In Political Writings, 61–92. Translated by H. B. Nisbet. Edited by Reiss, H.. Cambridge University Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Kant, Emmanuel. Le conflit des facultés en trois sections. Translated by J. Gibelin. Paris: Vrin, 1935.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Fondements de la métaphysique des moeurs. Translated by J. Barni. Paris: Librairie philosophique de Lagrange, 1848.Google Scholar

Kant, Emmanuel. Métaphysique des moeurs: deuxième partie: Doctrine de la vertu. Translated by Philonenko, Alexis. Paris: Vrin, 1996.Google Scholar

Kant, Emmanuel. Projet de paix perpétuelle. Translated by Jean Darbellay. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1958.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. On Perpetual Peace. Translated by H. B. Nisbet. Cambridge University Press 1970.Google Scholar

Kant, Emmanuel, Théorie et pratique. Translated by Françoise Proust. Paris: GF-Flammarion, 1994.Google Scholar

Kantorowicz, Ernst H. The King’s Two Bodies: A Study in Mediaeval Political Theology. Princeton University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Katz, Stanley N. “The American Constitution: A Revolutionary Interpretation.” In Beeman, Richard, Botein, Stephen, and Carter, Edward C. II, eds. Beyond Confederation: Origins of the Constitution and American National Identity, 23–37. Chapel Hill and London: University of North Carolina Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Katznelson, Ira. Fear Itself: The New Deal and the Making of Our Time. New York: Norton, 2014.Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans. General Theory of Law and State. Translated by Anders Wedberg. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1949.Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans. “Justice et droit naturel.” In Le droit naturel: annales de philosophie politique III. Paris: Pressses Univeritaires de France, 1959.Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans. Reine Rechtslehre. Translated by Charles Eisenmann. Paris: LGDJ, 1999.Google Scholar

Kennedy, Duncan. The Rise and Fall of Classical Legal Thought. Washington, DC: Beard Books, 2006.Google Scholar

Kenyon, Cecelia M. “Constitutionalism in Revolutionary America.” In Pennock, J. Roland and Chapman, John W, eds. Constitutionalism, NOMOS xx (1979), 84–120Google Scholar

Kenyon, Cecelia M. “The Declaration of Independence: Philosophy of Government in a Free Society.” In Aspects of American Liberty: Philosophical, Historical and Political, 114–25. Philadelphia: The American Philosophical Society 1977.Google Scholar

Keohane, Nannerl O. Philosophy and the State in France: The Renaissance to the Enlightenment. Princeton University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Kessler, Jeremy. “The Early Years of First Amendment Lochnerism.” Columbia Law Review 116 (2016), 1915–2004.Google Scholar

Klarman, Michael. The Framers’ Coup: The Making of the United States Constitution. Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Kloppenberg, James. Toward Democracy: The Struggle for Self-Rule in European and American Thought. Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Kloppenberg, James. Uncertain Victory: Social Democracy and Progressivism in European and American Thought 1870–1920. New York: Oxford University Press 1986.Google Scholar

Kloppenberg, James. “The Virtues of Liberalism: Christianity, Republicanism, and Ethics in Early American Political Discourse.” The Journal of American History 74 (1987), 9–33.Google Scholar

Κοndylis, Panayotis. Περί Αξιοπρέπειας. Translation of the text “Würde” in Historisches Lexicon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland Geschichliche Grundbegriffe. Athens: Ίνδικτος,2000.Google Scholar

Krotoszynski, Ron. Privacy Revisited: A Global Perspective on the Right to be Left Alone. New York: Oxford University Press 2016.Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Lacorne, Denis. “Le débat des droits de l’homme en France et aux Etats-Unis.” La Revue Tocqueville 14 (1993), 5–31.Google Scholar

Langton, Rae. “Speech Acts and Unspeakable acts.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 22 (1993), 293–330.Google Scholar

Langton, Rae. “Whose Right? Ronald Dworkin, Women and Pornographers.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 19 (1990), 311–59.Google Scholar

Larrère, Catherine. “Rousseau.” In Raynaud, Philippe et Rials, Stéphane, eds. Dictionnaire de philosophie politique, 687–95. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2003.Google Scholar

Laurence, Jonathan and Vaisse, Justin. Integrating Islam: Political and Religious Challenges in Contemporary France. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Lawrence, Charles R. “The Id, the Ego and Equal Protection: Reckoning with Unconscious Racism.” Stanford Law Review 39 (1987), 317–88.Google Scholar

Lebovic, Sam. Free Speech and Unfree News: The Paradox of Press Freedom in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Lecomte, Catherine. “Des dignités à la dignité.” In Fondations et naissances des droits de l’homme, vol. 1, L’odyssée des droits de l’homme. 159–66. Paris: L’Harmattan, 2003.Google Scholar

Lefort, Claude. L’Invention démocratique. Paris: Fayard, 1981.Google Scholar

Legros, Robert. “Hegel entre Lumières et romantisme.” In La Révolution française entre Lumières et romantisme. Cahiers de philosophie politique et juridique, no. 16, 143–57. Centre de Publications de l’Université de Caen, 1989.Google Scholar

Leibniz Gottfried, Wilhelm. La monadologie. Paris: C. Delagrave, 1881.Google Scholar

Lerner, Ralph. “The Constitution of the Thinking Revolutionary.” In Beeman, Richard, Botein, Stephen, and Carter, Edward C. II, eds. Beyond Confederation: Origins of the Constitution and American National Identity, 38–68. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, 1987.Google Scholar

Lessay, Franc. “Burke et la nationalisation de la raison.” La Révolution française entre Lumières et Romantisme. Cahiers de philosophie politique et juridique, no. 16. 65–82. Centre de Publications de l’Université de Caen, 1989.Google Scholar

Levinson, Sanford. Constitutional Faith. Princeton University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Levy, Jean-Paul. “Pratique du droit de réponse dans la presse écrite et la communication audiovisuelle.” In Dupeux, Jean-Yves and Lacabarats, Alain, eds. Liberté de la presse et droits de la personne, 31–35. Paris: Dalloz, 1997.Google Scholar

Levy, Leonard. Emergence of a Free Press. New York: Oxford University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Levy, Leonard. Origins of the Bill of Rights. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Lewis, Antony. Make No Law: The Sullivan Case and the First Amendment. New York: Vintage, 1991.Google Scholar

Lincoln, Anthony Handley. Some Political and Social Ideas of English Dissent, 1763–1800. Cambridge, 1938.Google Scholar

Lipset, Seymour Martin. American Exceptionalism: A Double-Edged Sword. New York: W. W. Norton and Company, 1996.Google Scholar

Lock, Geoffrey. “The 1689 Bill of Rights.” Political Studies 37 (1989), 540–61.Google Scholar

Locke, John. Essay on Human Understanding. Edited by Woolhouse, Roger. London: Penguin Books, 1997.Google Scholar

Locke, John. First Treatise of Government. In Two Treatises of Government. London: Thomas Tegg, 1823.Google Scholar

Locke, John. Letter concerning Toleration. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2010.Google Scholar

Locke, John. Questions Concerning the Law of Nature. Translated by Robert Horwitz and Jenny Strauss Clay. Edited by Diskin Clay. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Locke, John. The Second Treatise of Government. Edited by Wootton, David. London: Penguin Books, 1993.Google Scholar

Loughlin, Martin. The British Constitution: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Loughlin, Martin. “The Constitutional Imagination.” The Modern Law Review 78 (2015), 1–25.Google Scholar

Loughlin, Martin. Foundations of Public Law. Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Loughlin, Martin. The Idea of Public Law. Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Luchaire, François. Le juge constitutionnel en France et aux Etats-Unis: étude compare. Paris: Economica, 2002.Google Scholar

Mably, Gabriel Bonnot de. Des droits et des devoirs du citoyen. Paris: Librairie Marcel Didier, 1972.Google Scholar

Machiavelli, Nicolo. Discourses. In The Historical, Political and Diplomatic Writings. Boston: James R. Osgood and Company, 1881.Google Scholar

MacKinnon, Catharine. Only Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

MacKinnon, Catharine. Towards A Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Macpherson, C. B. The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke. Oxford University Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Madison, James. “Amendments to the Constitution” (speech of June 8, 1789). In A Century of Lawmaking for a New Nation: U.S. Congressional Documents and Debates, 1774 – 1875, Annals of Congress, House of Representatives, 1st Congress, 1st Session.Google Scholar

Madison, James. The Writings of James Madison. 9 vols. Edited by Hunt, Gaillard. New York and London: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1900–10.Google Scholar

Madison, James. The Papers of James Madison. Edited by Rutland, R. and Rachal, W.. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Maier, Pauline. American Scripture: Making the Declaration of Independence. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1997.Google Scholar

Maier, Pauline. Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution, 1787–1788. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2010.Google Scholar

Maistre, Joseph-Marie De. Considerations on France. Translated by Richard A. Lebrun. Montreal and London: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Malberg, Raymond Carré de. Théorie générale du droit et de l’Etat, vol. 1. Paris: Sirey, 1920.Google Scholar

Manent, Pierre. Cours familier de philosophie politique. Paris: Gallimard, 2001.Google Scholar

Manent, Pierre. Naissances de la politique moderne: Machiavel-Hobbes-Rousseau. Paris: Payot, 1977.Google Scholar

Mansfield, Harvey. “Les formes de la liberté: le constitutionnalisme dans la pensée politique classique et moderne.” In Marshall, Terence, ed. Théorie et pratique du gouvernement constitutionnel: la France et les Etats-Unis, 23–33. La Garenne Colombes: Editions de l’Espace Européen, 1992.Google Scholar

Marcaggi, Vincent. Les origines de la Déclaration des droits de l’homme de 1789. Paris: Fontemoing, 1912.Google Scholar

Maron, Eugène. Histoire littéraire de la convention nationale. Paris: Poulet Malassis et de Broise, 1860.Google Scholar

Marshall, Terence. “Les droits de l’homme et la politique constitutionnelle: un dialogue franco-américain à l’époque révolutionnaire.” In Bourgeois, Bernard et D’Hondt, Jacques, eds. La philosophie et la Révolution française, 29–48. Paris: Vrin, 1993.Google Scholar

Marx, Karl. Capital, vol. 1. Translated by Ben Fowkes. New York: Vintage, 1977.Google Scholar

Marx, Karl. “The Jewish Question.” In The Marx-Engels Reader, 26–52. Edited by Tucker, Robert. New York: Norton, 1978.Google Scholar

Marx, Karl. “The German Ideology.” In The Marx-Engels Reader, 146–200. Edited by Tucker, Robert. New York: Norton, 1978.Google Scholar

Mason, George. “Opposition to a Unitary Executive.” In Farrand, Max, ed. The Records of The Federal Convention of 1787, vol. 1. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1911.Google Scholar

Massey, Calvin R. The Ninth Amendment and the Constitution’s Unenumerated Rights Philadelphia. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Matsuda, Mari J. , et al., eds. Words that Wound: Critical Race Theory, Assaultive Speech and the First Amendment. London and New York: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar

Matthews, Richard K. If Men Were Angels: James Madison and the Heartless Empire of Reason. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1995.Google Scholar

Mayaud, Yves. “L’abus de droit en matière de droit de réponse.” In Dupeux, Jean-Yves and Lacabarats, Alain, eds. Liberté de la presse et droits de la personne, 5–16. Paris: Dalloz, 1997.Google Scholar

Mazo, Eugene. “Regulating Campaign Finance through Legislative Recusal Rules.” In Kuhner, Timothy K. and Mazo, Eugene D., eds. Democracy by the People: Reforming Campaign Finance in America. Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Mazauric, Claude. Babeuf et la conspiration pour l’égalité. Paris: Editions Sociales, 1962.Google Scholar

Mazzanti Pepe, Fernanda. “Mably pour une démocratie à la mesure de l’homme.” In Friedemann, Peter, Gauthier, Florence, Malvache, Jean-Luc, and Mazzani Pepe, Fernanda, eds. Colloque Mably: la politique comme science morale, vol. 1, 65–83. Bary: Palomar Casa Editrice, 1995.Google Scholar

McCloskey, H. J. “The Political Ideal of Privacy.” Philosophical Quarterly 21 (1971), 303–14.Google Scholar

McConnell, Michael W. “The Origins and Historical Understanding of Free Exercise of Religion.” Harvard Law Review 103 (1990), 1409–507.Google Scholar

McDonald, Forrest. Novus Ordo Seclorum: The Intellectual Origins of the Constitution. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1985.Google Scholar

McWilliams, Wilson Carey. “On Equality as the Moral Foundation for Community.” In Horwitz, Robert H., ed. The Moral Foundations of the American Republic, 183–213. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1979.Google Scholar

Meckstroth, Christopher. The Struggle for Democracy: Paradoxes of Progress and the Politics of Change. Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Meiklejohn, Alexander. “The First Amendment is an Absolute.” Supreme Court Review (1961), 245–66.Google Scholar

Meiklejohn, Alexander. “Free Speech and Its Relation to Self-Government.” In Political Freedom: The Constitutional Powers of the People. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press Publishers, 1979.Google Scholar

Meyer, Michael and Parent, William, eds. The Constitution of Rights: Human Dignity and American Values. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Michel, Alain. “La dignité humaine chez Cicéron.” In Magnard, Pierre, ed. La dignité de l’homme,17–24. Actes du Colloque tenu à la Sorbonne (Paris-IV). Paris: Honoré Champion, 1995.Google Scholar

Michelman, Frank. “Possession v. Distribution in the Constitutional Idea of Property.” Iowa Law Review 72 (1987), 1319–50.Google Scholar

Mill, John Stuart. “On Liberty.” In On Liberty and Other Essays. Edited by Gray, John. Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Milton, John. Areopagitica. Cambridge University Press, 1918.Google Scholar

Minow, Martha, “Equality and the Bill of Rights.” In Meyer, Michael and Parent, William, eds. The Constitution of Rights: Human Dignity and American Values, 118–28. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Montesquieu, Charles Louis de Secondat Baron de. Oeuvres complètes de Montesquieu. Edited by Oster, D.. Paris: Seuil, 1964.Google Scholar

Morelly, Étienne-Gabriel. Code de la nature. Paris: Paul Masgana, 1841.Google Scholar

Mornet, Daniel. Les origines intellectuelles de la Révolution française 1715–1787. Paris: Armand Colin 1954.Google Scholar

Moyn, Samuel. Not Enough: Human Rights in an Unequal World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Murrin, John M. “A Roof without Walls: The Dilemma of American National Identity.” In Beeman, Richard, Botein, Stephen, and Carter, Edward C. ii, eds. Beyond Confederation: Origins of the Constitution and American National Identity. Chapel Hill and London: University of North Carolina Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Nelson, Eric. The Royalist Revolution: Monarchy and the American Founding. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Nicolet, Claude. L’idée républicaine en France, 1789–1924. Paris: Gallimard, 1982.Google Scholar

Nietzsche, Friedrich. Zur Genealogie der Moral. Translated by Eric Blondel, Ole Hansen Love, Théo Levdenbach, and Pierre Pénisson. Paris: GF Flammarion, 2000.Google Scholar

Oakeshott, Michael. Morality and Politics in Modern Europe. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Ossipow, William and Gerber, Dominik. “The Reception of Vattel’s Law of Nations in the American Colonies: From James Otis and John Adams to the Declaration of Independence.” American Journal of Legal History 57 (2017), 521–55.Google Scholar

Otis, James. “A Vindication of the British Colonies.” In Samuelson, Richard, ed. Collected Political Writings of James Otis, 183–208. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2015.Google Scholar

Otis, James. “Essay on the Writs of Assistance Case” (Boston Gazette, January 4, 1762). In Collected Political Writings of James Otis, 15–18. Indianapolis, Liberty Fund, 2015.Google Scholar

Otis, James. The Rights of the British Colonies: Asserted and Proved. Boston and London:J. Almon, 1764.Google Scholar

Ozouf, Mona. L’homme régénéré. Paris: Gallimard, 1989.Google Scholar

Paine, Thomas. “The Rights of Man, Part I.” In Political Writings. Edited by Kuklick, Bruce. Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Paine, Thomas. “The Rights of Man, Part II.” In Political Writings. Edited by Kuklick, Bruce. Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Paine, Thomas. Common Sense. New York: Alfred Knopf, 1994.Google Scholar

Palmer, Robert R. The Age of the Democratic Revolution: A Political History of Europe and America, 1760–1800. Princeton University Press, 1959.Google Scholar

Palmer, Robert R. “The European Enlightenment in Its American Setting.” In Aspects of American Liberty: Philosophical, Historical and Political, 47–55. Philadelphia: The American Philosophical Society, 1977.Google Scholar

Pangle, Thomas L. The Spirit of Modern Republicanism: The Moral Vision of the American Founders and the Philosophy of Locke. University of Chicago Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Parent, William. “Constitutional Values and Human Dignity.” In Meyer, Michael and Parent, William, eds. The Constitution of Rights: Human Dignity and American Values, 47–72. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Parent, William. “A New Definition of Privacy for the Law.” Law and Philosophy 2 (1983), 305–38.Google Scholar

Patel, Kiran Klaus. The New Deal: A Global History. Princeton University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Pech, Lauren. La liberté d’expression et sa limitation: les enseignements de l’expérience américaine au regard d’expériences européennes (Allemagne, France et Convention européenne des droits de l’homme). Presses Universitaires de la Faculté de Droit de Clermont Ferrand, LGDJ, 2003.Google Scholar

Pellegrin, Pierre. “Aristote.” In Raynaud, Philippe et Rials, Stéphane, eds. Dictionnaire de Philosophie Politique, 28–36. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2003.Google Scholar

Peller, Gary. “The Metaphysics of American Law.” California Law Review 73 (1985), 1152–290.Google Scholar

Pettit, Philip. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Philonenko, Alexis. Jean-Jacques Rousseau et la pensée du malheur, 3 vols. Paris: Vrin, 1984.Google Scholar

Philonenko, Alexis. Théorie et praxis dans la pensée morale et politique de Kant et de Fichte en 1793. Paris: Vrin, 1968.Google Scholar

Pico della Mirandola, Giovanni. De la dignité de l’homme. Translated by Yves Hersant. Paris : Editions de l’Eclat, 1993.Google Scholar

Pincus, Steve. 1688: The First Modern Revolution. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Pincus, Steve. The Heart of the Declaration: The Founders’ Case for an Activist Government. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Pocock, J. G. A. The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. Princeton University Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Pocock, J. G. A. “1776: The Revolution Against Parliament.” In Pocock, J. G. A., ed. Three British Revolutions: 1641, 1689, 1776. Princeton University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Polanyi, Karl. The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Polin, Raymond. La politique de la solitude: essai sur la philosophie politique de Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Paris: Sirey, 1971.Google Scholar

Polin, Raymond. La politique morale de John Locke. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1960.Google Scholar

Popper, Karl. “Epistemology without a Knowing Subject.” In Objective Knowledge,. Clarendon Press: Oxford University Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Post, Robert. Citizens Divided: Campaign Finance Reform and the Constitution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Post, Robert and Molnar, Peter. “Interview with Robert Post.” In Herz, Michael and Molnar, Peter, eds. The Content and Context of Hate Speech: Rethinking Regulation and Responses, 11–36. Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Post, Robert and Shanor, Amanda. “Adam Smith’s First Amendment.” Harvard Law Review Forum 128 (2015), 165–82.Google Scholar

Pound, Roscoe. “Mechanical Jurisprudence.” Columbia Law Review 8 (1908). 605–23Google Scholar

Pound, Roscoe. “Liberty of Contract.” Yale Law Journal 18 (1909), 454–87Google Scholar

Powe, Lucas A. The Warren Court and American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Price, Richard. A Discourse on the Love of Country 2nd ed. London: T. Cadell, 1789.Google Scholar

Primus, Richard. The American Language of Rights. Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Primus, Richard. “An Introduction to the Nature of American Rights.” In Shain, Barry Alan, ed. The Nature of Rights at the American Founding and Beyond, 15–24. Charlottesville and London: University of Virginia Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Proudhon, Pierre Joseph. De la justice dans la Révolution et dans l’Eglise, vol. 1. Paris: Libraire de Garnier Frères, 1858.Google Scholar

Purdy, Jedediah. A Tolerable Anarchy: Rebels, Reactionaries and the Making of American Freedom. New York: Vintage, 2010.Google Scholar

Rabban, David. Free Speech in Its Forgotten Years. Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Rabban, David. “The Ahistorical Historian: Leonard Levy and Freedom of Expression in Early American History.” Stanford Law Review 37 (1985), 795–856.Google Scholar

Rakove, Jack N. Original Meanings: Politics and Ideas in the Making of the Constitution. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1996.Google Scholar

Raynaud, Phillippe. “Anciens et Modernes.” In Raynaud, Philippe and Rials, Stéphane, eds. Dictionnaire de philosophie politique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2003.Google Scholar

Raynaud, Philippe. “Locke et les limites de la raison libérale.” In Raynaud, Philippe and Rials, Stéphane, eds. Une prudence moderne?, 21–33. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1992.Google Scholar

Raynaud, Philippe. “Lumières et Anti-lumières: de la Révolution française au romantisme politique.” In La Révolution française entre Lumières et romantisme. Cahiers de philosophie politique et juridique, no. 16. 179–92. Centre de Publications de l’Université de Caen, 1989.Google Scholar

Raynaud, Philippe. “Révolution américaine.” In Raynaud, Philippe et Rials, Stéphane, eds. Dictionnaire de philosophie politique, 669–76. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2003.Google Scholar

Raynaud, Philippe. “Révolution française.” In Raynaud, Philippe and Rials, Stéphane, eds. Dictionnaire de philosophie politique, 669–76. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2003.Google Scholar

Raynaud, Philippe. Trois révolutions de la liberté: Angleterre, Amérique, France. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2009.Google Scholar

Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Rawls, John. Political Liberalism. Columbia University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Redlich, Norman. “Are there ‘Certain Rights retained by the People?’” In Barnett, Randy E., ed. The Rights Retained by the People: The History and Meaning of the Ninth Amendment, 127–47. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Reid, John Phillip. “The Authority of Rights at the American Founding.” In Shain, Barry Alan, ed. The Nature of Rights at the American Founding and Beyond, 258–79. Charlottesville and London: University of Virginia Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Reid, John Philip. The Concept of Liberty in the Age of the American Founding. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Reid, John Phillip. Constitutional History of the American Revolution: The Authority of Rights. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Renaut, Alain. Le système du droit: philosophie et droit dans la pensée de Fichte. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1986.Google Scholar

Rials, Stéphane. “La Déclaration de 1789: le mystère des origins.” Droits 8 (1988), 3–21.Google Scholar

Rials, Stéphane. La Déclaration des droits de l’homme et du citoyen. Paris: Hachette, 1988.Google Scholar

Rials, Stéphane. “Ouverture: généalogie des droits de l’homme.” Droits 2 (1985), 3–12.Google Scholar

Richards, David A. J. “Constitutional Liberty, Dignity, and Reasonable Justification.” In Meyer, Michael and Parent, William, eds. The Constitution of Rights, Human Dignity and American Values, 73–101. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Richards, David A. J. Foundations of American Constitutionalism. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Richards, David A. J. “Free Speech as Toleration.” In Waluchow, W. J., ed. Free Expression, Essays in Law and Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Ricoeur, Paul. “The Erosion of Tolerance and the Resistance of the Intolerable.” In Ricoeur, Paul, ed. Tolerance Between Intolerance and the Intolerable, 189–201. Providence, RI: Bergahn Books, 1996.Google Scholar

Ritter, Joachim. Hegel et la Révolution française. Translated by Xavier Tilliette. Paris: Beauchesne, 1970.Google Scholar

Rivero, Jean. “Intervention in the Debate on ‘Les Libertés.’” In Favoureux, Louis, ed. La continuité constitutionnelle en France, de 1789 à 1989. Paris: Presses Universitaires d’Aix-Marseille, 1990.Google Scholar

Robbins, Caroline. The Eighteenth Century Commonwealthman: Studies in the Transmission, Development and Circumstance of English Liberal Thought from the Restoration of Charles III till the War with the Thirteen Colonies. New York: Atheneum, 1969.Google Scholar

Robbins, Caroline. “‘When It Is That Colonies May Turn Independent’: An Analysis of the Environment and Politics of Francis Hutcheson (1694–1746).” William and Mary Quarterly 11 (1954), 214–51.Google Scholar

Robespierre, Maximilien. Discours sur la liberté de la presse, prononcé à la Société des amis de la constitution le 11 Mai 1791. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale, 1791.Google Scholar

Robespierre, Maximilien. “Discours sur la liberté de la presse.” In Oeuvres de Maximilien Robespierre, vol. 8. Edited by Bouloiseau, Marc, Lefebvre, Georges, and Soboul, Albert. Paris: Centre Nationale des Recherches Scientifiques, 2007.Google Scholar

Robespierre, Maximilien. “Discours sur les subsistances et le droit à l’existence.” In Discours pour le bonheur et pour la liberté. Edited by Bosc, Yannick, Gauthier, Florence, and Wahnich, Sophie. Paris: La Fabrique, 2000.Google Scholar

Robespierre, Maximilien. Oeuvres de Maximilien Robespierre. 10 vols. Edited by Bouloiseau, Marc, Lefebvre, Georges, and Soboul, Albert. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1958.Google Scholar

Rosanvallon, Pierre. La démocratie inachevée: histoire de la souveraineté du peuple en France. Paris: Gallimard, 2000.Google Scholar

Rosanvallon, Pierre. Le modèle politique français: la société civile contre le jacobinisme, de 1789 à nos jours. Paris: Seuil 2004.Google Scholar

Rosenberg, Norman L. “Another World.” Reviews in American History 16 (1988), 554–59.Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Discours sur l’économie politique. In Oeuvres complètes, vol. 3. Paris: Gallimard, 1964.Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Discours sur l’origine et les fondements de l’inégalité parmi les hommes. In Oeuvres complètes, vol. 3. Paris: Gallimard, 1964.Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Discours sur les sciences et les arts. In Oeuvres complètes, vol. 3. Paris: Gallimard, 1964.Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Du contrat social (première version, manuscrit de Genève). In Oeuvres complètes, vol. 3, 281–346. Paris: Gallimard, 1964.Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Du contrat social. In Oeuvres complètes, vol. 3. Paris: Gallimard, 1964.Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Emile. In Oeuvres complètes, vol. 4. Paris: Gallimard, 1969.Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Lettres écrites de la montagne. In Oeuvres complètes, vol. 3. Paris: Gallimard, 1964.Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Oeuvres complètes. 5 vols. Paris: Gallimard, 1959–95.Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. “On the Social Contract.” The Basic Political Writings. Translated by Donald A. Cress. Edited by Peter Gay. Indianapolis, Hackett, 1987.Google Scholar

Roy, Jean. “La ‘prérogative’ chez Locke.” In Goyard-Fabre, Simone, ed. La Pensée Libérale de John Locke, 149–55. Cahiers de philosophie politique et juridique, no. 5. Centre de Publications de l’Université de Caen. 1984.Google Scholar

Rumble, Wilfrid E. “James Madison on the Value of Bills of Rights.” In Pennock, J. Roland and Chapman, John W, eds. Constitutionalism: NOMOS xx (1979), 122–62.Google Scholar

Sadoun, Marc, ed. La démocratie en France 1: idéologies. Paris: Gallimard, 2000.Google Scholar

Saint-Just, Louis Antoine de. “Ésprit de la Révolution et de la Constitution de France.” In Oeuvres complètes, vol. 1. Paris: Charpentier et Fasquelle, 1908.Google Scholar

Saint-Just, Louis Antoine de. “Fragments sur les institutions républicaines.” In Oeuvres complètes, vol. 2. Paris: Charpentier et Fasquelle, 1908.Google Scholar

Sandel, Michael. Democracy’s Discontent: America in Search of a Public Philosophy Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Sartorius, Rolf, ed. Paternalism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Sartori, Giovanni. Théorie de la démocratie. Paris: Armand Colin, 1973.Google Scholar

Scanlon, Thomas. “A Theory of Freedom of Expression.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 1, no. 2 (1972) 204–226.Google Scholar

Schauer, Frederick. “Categories and the First Amendment: A Play in Three Acts.” Vanderbilt Law Review 34 (1981), 265–307.Google Scholar

Schauer, Frederick. “Free Speech and The Social Construction of Privacy.” Social Research 68 (2001), 221–31Google Scholar

Schauer, Frederick. Free Speech: A Philosophical Inquiry. Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Schauer, Frederick. “Uncoupling Free Speech.” Columbia Law Review 92 (1992), 1321–57.Google Scholar

Schauer, Frederick. “The Exceptional First Amendment.” In Ignatieff, Michael, ed. American Exceptionalism and Human Rights, 29–56. Princeton University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Schivelbusch, Wolfgang. Three New Deals: Reflections on Roosevelt’s America, Mussolini’s Italy, and Hitler’s Germany, 1933–1939. New York: Metropolitan Books, 2006.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl. The Concept of the Political. Translated by George Schwab. University of Chicago Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl. Political Theology. Translated by George Schwab. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Schneider, Louis, ed. The Scottish Moralists on Human Nature and Society. University of Chicago Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Schwartz, Bernard, ed. The Bill of Rights: A Documentary History. New York: Chelsea House Publishers, 1971.Google Scholar

Schwartz, Paul M. “The EU-US Privacy Collision: A Turn to Institutions and Procedures.” Harvard Law Review 126 (2013), 1966–2009.Google Scholar

Schwartz, Paul M. and Solove, Daniel J. “Reconciling Personal Information in the United States and European Union.” California Law Review 102 (2014), 877–916.Google Scholar

Schwoerer, Lois G. “The Bill of Rights: Epitome of the Revolution of 1688–89.” In Pocock, J. G. A., ed. Three British Revolutions: 1641, 1688, 1776, 225–43. Princeton University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Scott, Austin. “Holmes v. Walton: The New Jersey Precedent.” American Historical Review 4 (1899), 456–60.Google Scholar

Seidman, Louis Michael and Tushnet, Mark V. “The State Action Paradox.” In Remnants of Belief, Contemporary Constitutional Issues, 49–71. Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Sellers, M. N. American Republicanism: Roman Ideology in the United States Constitution. London: MacMillan, 1994.Google Scholar

Sellers, M. N. The Sacred Fire of Liberty: Republicanism, Liberalism and the Law. London: MacMillan, 1998.Google Scholar

Shain, Barry. The Myth of American Individualism: The Protestant Origins of American Political Thought. Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Shain, Barry A. “Rights Natural and Civil in the Declaration of Independence.” In Shain, Barry Alan, ed. The Nature of Rights at the American Founding and Beyond, 116–62. Charlottesville and London: University of Virginia Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Shiffrin, Seana. Speech Matters: On Lying, Morality, and the Law. Princeton University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Shklar, Judith. “Liberté positive: liberté négative en Amérique.” In Les usages de la liberté, 107–35. Neuchâtel: Ed. De la Baconnière, 1990.Google Scholar

Shklar, Judith. Men and Citizens: A Study of Rousseau’s Political Theory. Cambridge University Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Sieyès, Joseph Emmanuel. Ecrits politiques. Edited by Zapperi, Roberto. Paris: Editions des archives Contemporaines, 1985.Google Scholar

Sieyès, Joseph Emmanuel. Political Writings. Edited by Sonenscher, Michael. Indianapolis, Cambridge: Hackett, 2003.Google Scholar

Silier, Yildiz. Freedom: Political, Metaphysical, Negative and Positive. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. The Foundations of Modern Political Thought, vol. 2. Cambridge University Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. Liberty before Liberalism. Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Smith, Adam. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1982.Google Scholar

Smith, Adam. The Wealth of Nations, vol. 1. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1981.Google Scholar

Smith, Joseph Henry. Appeals to the Privy Council from the American Plantations. New York: Columbia University Press, 1950.Google Scholar

Smith, Rogers M. Liberalism and American Constitutional Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Soboul, Albert. “Babeuf et le Babouvisme.” In Oeuvres de Babeuf, vol. 1, Babeuf avant la Révolution, 7–22. Edited by Daline, V., Saitta, A., Soboul, A.. Paris: Bibliothèque Nationale, 1977.Google Scholar

Solomon, Stephen D. Revolutionary Dissent: How the Founding Generation Created the Freedom of Speech. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Somos, Mark. American States of Nature: The Origins of Independence, 1761–1775. Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Spinoza, Benedict. Tractatus Theologicophilosophicus. Translated by Jonathan Israel and Michael Silverthorne. Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Spitz, Jean-Fabien. “Jean-Jacques Rousseau et les droits de l’individu.” In Cazzaniga, Gian Mario–Zarka, Yves Charles, eds. L’individu dans la pensée moderne XVIe–XVIIIe siècles, 659–74 Pisa: Edizioni, 1995.Google Scholar

Staël, Madame de. Considérations sur les principaux évenements de la Révolution Ffançaise. Paris: Delaunay Libraire, 1818.Google Scholar