Altick, Richard. The English Common Reader. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1957.Google Scholar

Austin, J. L.How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon, 1962.Google Scholar

Beowulf. See Kiernan, Beowulf project.

Bickerton, Derek. Roots of Language. Ann Arbor: Karoma Publishers, 1981.Google Scholar

Binder, Henry., ed. Red Badge of Courage. New York: W. W. Norton, 1979.Google Scholar

Blake. See Viscomi, Blake Archive.

Bornstein, George. Material Modernism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Bowers, Fredson. Bibliography and Textual Criticism. Oxford: Clarendon, 1964.Google Scholar

Bowers, FredsonEssays in Bibliography, Text, and Editing. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1975.Google Scholar

Bowers, Fredson Textual preface and “Textual Introduction” to The Scarlet Letter and The House of Seven Gables in The Centenary Edition of the Works of Nathaniel Hawthorne. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1962, 1964.Google Scholar

Bowers, Fredson “Textual Criticism,” in The Aims and Methods of Scholarship in Modern Languages and Literatures, ed. Thorpe, James. New York: Modern Language Association, 1970, pp. 23–42.Google Scholar

Braun-Rau, Alexandra. King Lear project. www.textkritik.uni-muenchen.de/abraun-rau/lear/King_Lear/startseite.html (accessed 15 November 2004).

Bryant, John. The Fluid Text: A Theory of Revision and Editing for Book and Screen.Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burton, Anthony. “Thackeray's Collaborations with Cruikshank, Doyle, and Walker.” Costerus n.s.2 (1974), 141–84.Google Scholar

CSE Guidelines for Scholarly Editions. www.jefferson.village.virginia.edu/∼jmu2m/cse/CSEguidelines.html; and www.sunsite.berkeley.edu/MLA/intro.html.

Caldwell, T. Price. “Molecular Sememics: A Progress Report.” Meisei Review 4 (1989), 65–86.Google Scholar

Caldwell, T. Price “Whorf, Orwell, and Mentalese.” Meisei Review 19 (2004), 91–106.Google Scholar

Calvin, William H.Conversations With Neil's Brain: The Neural Nature of Thought and Language. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1994.Google Scholar

Cambridge, Ada. A Woman's Friendship. Ed. Morrison, Elizabeth. Kensington, NSW: University of New South Wales Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Chaucer. See Robinson, Chaucer.

Chesnutt, David, Susan Hockey, and Michael Sperberg-McQueen. Model Editions Project. www.adh.sc.edu.

Cohen, Morton, and Gondolfo, Anita, eds. Lewis Carroll and the House of Macmillan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Colby, R. A. and J. Sutherland. “Thackeray's Manuscripts: A Preliminary Census of Library Locations.” Costerus n.s.2 (1974); and Lange, T. V. “Appendix: The Robert H. Taylor Collection.” Costerus n.s. 2 (1974).

Cross, Nigel. The Common Writer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Dedner, Burghard. “Editing Fragments as Fragments.” TEXT 16 (2004), 97–111.Google Scholar

Deppman, Jed, Ferrer, Daniel, and Groden, Michael, eds. Genetic Criticism: Texts and Avant-Textes. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Smedt, Marcel, and Vanhoutte, Edward. Stijn Streuvels, De Teleurgang van den Waterhoek. Elektronisch-kritische editie/electronic-critical edition. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press/KANTL, 2000(CD-Rom).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dickinson. See Smith. Dickinson.

Dijksterhuis, E. J.Mechanization of the World Picture. Oxford: Clarendon, 1961.Google Scholar

D'Iorio, Paolo, et al. HyperNietzsche Project http://www.hypernietzsche.org accessed 28 October 2004.

“Draft Guidelines for Electronic Scholarly Editions.” Committee on Scholarly Editions http://www.iath.virginia.edu/∼jmu2m/cse/Editors.rpt.htm.

Duggan, Hoyt, et al. Piers Plowman Archive. www.iath.virginia.edu/piers/archive.goals.html.

Eco, Umberto. The Limits of Interpretation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Eco, UmbertoThe Open Work. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1989 (first published as Opera aperta in 1962).Google Scholar

Eco, UmbertoSerendipities: Language and Lunacy. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eco, Umberto “After Secret Knowledge.” TLS (22 June 1990), 666.Google Scholar

Eggert, Paul. “Document or Process as the Site of Authority: Establishing Chronology of Revisions in Competing Typescripts of Lawrence's The Boy in the Bush.” Studies in Bibliography 44 (1991), 364–76.Google Scholar

Eggert, Paul “The Golden Stain of Time.” Books and Bibliography: Essays in Commemoration of Don McKenzie, ed. Thomson, John. Wellington: Victoria University Press, 2002, pp. 116–28.Google Scholar

Eggert, Paul “Textual Product or Textual Process: Procedures and Assumptions of Critical Editing” in Editing in Australia. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press, 1990, pp. 19–40; rept. in Cohen, Phil, ed. Devils and Angels. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1991, pp. 124–33.Google Scholar

Eggert, Paul, Phill Berrie, Graham Barwell, and Chris Tiffin. jitm (Just In Time Markup). www.unsw.adfa.edu.au/ASEC/PWB_REPORT/JITM/.pdf; and www3.iath.virginia.edu/sds/Eggert-Berry.html.

Eliot, Simon. Some Patterns and Trends in British Publishing, 1800–1919. Occasional Papers of the Bibliographical Society, No. 8, 1994, sections A and C.

Faulkner, William. Go Down, Moses. New York: Random House, 1942.Google Scholar

Feltes, N. N.Literary Capital and the Late Victorian Novel. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Feltes, N. N.Modes of Production of Victorian Novels. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986. [See my review in JEGP 87 (1988), 262–5.]Google Scholar

Fiormonte, Domenico, and Pusceddu, Cinzia. “The Text as a Product and as a Process. History, Genesis, Experiments.” Verslagen en Mededelingen van de KANTL (forthcoming, 2006).Google Scholar

Fiormonte, Domenico, and Cinzia Pusceddu. Digital Variants. Digital Variants. http://www.selc.ed.ac.uk/italian/digitalvariants/.

Flanagan, Richard. Gould's Book of Fish: A Novel in Twelve Fish. London: Atlantic Books, 2001.Google Scholar

Flanders, Julia, et al. Women Writers Project. www.wwp.brown.edu.

Frankel, Nicholas. Oscar Wilde's Decorated Books. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gabler, Hans Walter, Bornstein, George, and Pierce, Gillian Borland, eds. Contemporary German Editorial Theory. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaskell, Philip. A New Introduction to Bibliography. Oxford: Clarendon, 1972.Google Scholar

Gatrell, Simon. Hardy the Creator: A Textual Biography. Oxford: Clarendon, 1988.Google Scholar

Geisel, Theodore Seuss (Dr. Seuss). The 500 Hats of Bartholomew Cubbins. New York: Vangard, 1938.Google Scholar

Goethe, Wolfgang. “Venetian Epigrams”. MSS at the Goethe Archive. Weimar, Germany.

Google. www.google.com.

Greetham, David C.Theories of the Text. London: Oxford University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greg, W. W. “The Rationale of Copy-Text.” Studies in Bibliography 3 (1950–1), 19–36.Google Scholar

“Guidelines for Scholarly Editions.” Committee on Scholarly Editions. http://sunsite.berkeley.edu/MLA/guidelines.html and http://jefferson.village.virginia.edu/∼jmu2m/cse/CSEguidelines.html.

Hagen, June Steffensen. Tennyson and his Publishers. London: Macmillan, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haight, Gordon, ed. George Eliot, The Mill on the Floss. Oxford: Clarendon, 1980.Google Scholar

Harden, Edgar. A Checklist of Contributions by William Makepeace Thackeray to Newspapers, Periodicals, Books, and Serial Part Issues, 1828–1864. No. 68 ELS Monograph Series. Victoria, B.C.: English Literary Studies, University of Victoria, 1996.Google Scholar

Harris, Margaret. A Checklist of the “Three-Decker” Collection in the Fisher Library, University of Sydney. Department of English, University of Sydney, 1980.Google Scholar

Harvey, J. R.Victorian Novelists and their Illustrators. New York: New York University Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Hernadi, Paul. “Literary Theory,” in Introduction to Scholarship in Modern Languages and Literatures, ed. Gibaldi, Joseph. New York: Modern Language Association, 1981, pp. 98–115.Google Scholar

Hill, W. Speed. [Review of Dave Oliphant and Robin Bradford's New Directions in Textual Studies (1990).] TEXT 6 (1994), 370–81.

Hirsch, E. D.Cultural Literacy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1987.Google Scholar

Hirsch, E. DValidity in Interpretation. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Holdeman, David. “The Editor as Artist.” Presented at the Society for Textual Scholarship, New York, April 2001; revised, Annual Faculty Lecture, English Department, University of North Texas, November 2001.

Housman, A. E. “The Application of Thought to Textual Criticism.” Proceedings of the Classical Association 18 (1922), 67–84; rpt. in Selected Prose, ed. John Carter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1961, pp. 131–50.Google Scholar

Institute for Advanced Technology in the Humanities. www.iath.virginia.edu/.

Jackendoff, Ray. Patterns in the Mind: Language and Human Nature. New York: Harvester / Wheatsheaf, 1993.Google Scholar

Johnson, Samuel. “On the Character and Duty of an Academic,” first published in “J. D. Fleeman: A Memoir,” David Fairer. Studies in Bibliography 48 (1995), 1–24.

Jonson, Ben. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Ben Jonson. http://uk.cambridge.org/literature/features/cwbj/project/ accessed 15 November 2004.

Joyce, James. Ulysses, ed. Gabler, Hans Walter. New York: Random House, 1987.Google Scholar

Kamuf, Peggy. “Preface,” A Derrida Reader: Between the Blinds. New York: Columbia University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Karlsson, Lina, and Malm, Linda. “Revolution or Remediation?: A Study of Electronic Scholarly Editions on the Web.” HumanIT 7.1 (2004), 1–46.Google Scholar

Katz, Joseph, ed. [Reviews of paperback editions.] Proof 2–4, 1970–72.

Keane, Robert. Dante Gabriel Rossetti: The Poet as Craftsman. New York: Peter Lang, 2002.Google Scholar

Kiernan, Kevin. Beowulf. www.uky.edu/∼kiernan/eBeowulf/guide.htm accessed 15 November 2004.

Kiernan, Kevin [Probable location for] Boethius project. www.uky.edu/∼kiernan/eBoethius/pubs.htm accessed 15 November 2004.

Landow, George. See Victorian Web.

Law, Graham. Serializing Fiction in the Victorian Press. London: Palgrave, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lawrence, T. E.The Mint. London: Jonathan Cape and Garden City, New York: Doubleday, 1955. (Limited edition unexpurgated; trade editions expurgated until 1973.)Google Scholar

Lochard, Eric-Olivier, and Dominique Taurisson. “‘The World According to Arcane.’ An Operating Instrumental Paradigm for Scholarly Editions” in Perspectives of Scholarly Editing / Perspektiven der Textedition, ed. Plachta, Bodo and Vliet, H. T. M. (Berlin: Weidler Buchverlag, 2002), pp. 151–62.Google Scholar

Lougy, Robert E. “The Structure of Vanity Fair.” PMLA 90 (1975), 256–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lowry, Malcolm. The Collected Poetry of Malcolm Lowry. Ed. Scherf, Kathleen. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Lowry, Malcolm. Selected Poems. Ed. Birney, Earle, with assistance. from Margerie Lowry. San Francisco: City Lights Books, 1962.Google Scholar

Luke, Hugh J. “The Publishing of Byron's Don Juan.” PMLA, 80 (June 1965), 199–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mailloux, Steven. Interpretive Conventions: The Reader in the Study of American Fiction. Cornell University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Martens, Gunter. “(De)Constructing the Text by Editing: Reflections on the Receptional Significance of Textual Apparatuses,” in Contemporary German Editorial Theory, ed. Gabler, Hans Walter, Bornstein, George, and Pierce, Gillian Borland. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1995, pp. 125–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martens, Gunter “What Is a Text? Attempts at Defining a Central Concept in Editorial Theory,” in Contemporary German Editorial Theory, ed. Gabler, Hans Walter, Bornstein, George, and Pierce, Gillian Borland. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1995, pp. 209–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marx, Karl. Communist Manifesto. Translated by MacFarland, Helen in volume with George Julian Harney, Red Republican. London, 1850.Google Scholar

Marx, Karl, and Frederick Engels. Manifesto of the Communist Partywww.anu.edu.au/polsci/marx/classics/manifesto.html accessed 19 November 2004.

Matthiessen, F. O.American Renaissance. New York: Oxford University Press, 1941.Google Scholar

McGann, Jerome J.. Black Riders. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

McGann, Jerome J.A Critique of Modern Textual Criticism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983.Google Scholar

McGann, JeromeRadiant Textuality: Literature After the World Wide Web. New York: Palgrave, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGann, JeromeThe Textual Condition. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

McGann, Jerome J. “The Gutenberg Variations.” TEXT 14 (2002), 1–13.Google Scholar

McGann, Jerome “Imagining What You Don't Know,” in Voice, Text, and HyperText, ed. Modiano, Raimonda, Searle, Leroy, and Shillingsburg, Peter. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2003, pp. 378–97.Google Scholar

McGann, Jerome “Literary Pragmatics and the Editorial Horizon,” in Devils and Angels: Textual Editing and Literary Theory. ed., Cohen, Philip. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1991, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar

McGann, Jerome The Rossetti Archive. www.iath.virginia.edu/rossetti/fullarch.html.

McGann, Jerome “The Rossetti Hypermedia Archive: An Introduction.” Journal of Pre-Raphaelite Studies 8 (Spring 1997), 5–21.Google Scholar

McGann, Jerome “Rossetti's Iconic Page,” in The Iconic Page, ed. Tinkle, Theresa and Bornstein, George. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1998, pp. 123–40.Google Scholar

McGann, Jerome “Theories of the Text.” London Review of Books. (18 February 1988), 20–1.Google Scholar

McKenzie, D. F.The Sociology of Bibliography (Panizzi Lectures, 1985). London: British Library, 1986.Google Scholar

McKerrow, R. B. “The Treatment of Shakespeare's Text by His Earlier Editors, 1709–1768.” Proceedings of the British Academy 19 (1933), 89–122.Google Scholar

McLaverty, James. Pope, Print, and Meaning. London: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Mehl, Dieter. “Editorial Theory and Practice in English Studies in Germany.” Problems of Editing biehefte zu editio, ed. Christa Jansohn (1999).

Modiano, Raimonda, Searle, Leroy, and Shillingsburg, Peter, eds. Voice, Text, and HyperText. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Myers, Gary. “For Now and Always.” New Yorker (28 October 1985).Google Scholar

Nichol, John W. “Melville's ‘“Soiled” Fish of the Sea.’” American Literature 21 (November 1949), 338–9.Google Scholar

Nietzsche. See D'Iorio.

Nowell-Smith, Simon. International Copyright Law and the Publisher in the Reign of Queen Victoria. London: Oxford University Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Parker, Hershel. Flawed Texts and Verbal Icons. Evansville: Northwestern University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Patten, Robert. Charles Dickens and his Publishers. Oxford: Clarendon, 1978.Google Scholar

Pickwoad, Nicholas. “Commentary on Illustrations,” in Vanity Fair, ed. Peter Shillingsburg. New York: Garland, 1989 and in The History of Pendennis, ed. Peter Shillingsburg. New York: Garland, 1991.

Pizer, Donald. [Review of the Pennsylvania Sister Carrie,] American Literature 53 (January 1982), 731–7.

Plachta, Bodo. “In Between the ‘Royal Way’ of Philology and ‘Occult Science’: Some Remarks About German Discussion on Text Constitution in the Last Ten Years.” TEXT 12 (1999), 31–47.Google Scholar

Plachta, Bodo “Teaching Editing–Learning Editing.” Problems of Editing biehefte zu editio, ed. Christa Jansohn (1999).

Plato. “Ion,” Translated by. Saunders, Trevor J.. in Plato: Early Socratic Dialogues. London: Penguin, 1987.Google Scholar

Plato Phaedras. Translated by Hackforth, R.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1952.Google Scholar

Plato Republic. Translated by Waterfield, Robin. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Postal, Paul M. Skeptical Linguistic Essays. www.nyu.edu/gsas/dept/lingu/people/faculty/postal/papers/skeptical.pdf (downloaded 4 July 2003).

Purdy, R. L.Thomas Hardy: A Bibliographical Study. London: Oxford University Press, 1954.Google Scholar

Ray, Gordon N.Bibliographical Resources for the Study of Nineteenth Century Fiction. Los Angeles: Clark Library, 1964.Google Scholar

Ray, Gordon N ed. The Letters and Private Papers of William Makepeace Thackeray. 4 vols. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1946.Google Scholar

Ray, Gordon N “The Importance of Original Editions.” Nineteenth Century English Books. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1952.

Reiman, Donald. The Study of Modern Manuscripts: Public, Confidential, and Private. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Reiman, Donald “‘Versioning’: The Presentation of Multiple Texts.” Romantic Texts and Contexts. Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1987, pp. 167–80.

Renear, Alan. “Literal Transcription – Can the Text Ontologist Help?” in New Media and the Humanities: Research and Applications, ed. Fiormonte, Domenico and Usher, Jonathan. Oxford: Humanities Computing Unit, on behalf of Instituto Italiano di cultura per la Scozia e l'Irlanda del Nord, 2001, pp. 23–30.Google Scholar

Robinson, Peter. ‘Collation, Textual Criticism, Publication and the Computer.’ text 7 (1995), 77–94.Google Scholar

Robinson, Peter Chaucer: The Wife of Bath's Prologue on CD-ROM. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. [Canterbury Tales project, demonstration] http://www.cta.dmu.ac.uk/projects/ctp/desc2.html (accessed 19 December 2003). See also Robinson's work in Elizabeth Solopova, ed., The General Prologue on CD-ROM. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000 [CD-ROM].Google Scholar

Robinson, Peter Scholarly Digital Editions. www.sd-editions.com/.

Robinson, Peter “Where We Are With Electronic Scholarly Editions, and Where We Want To Be.” Jahrbuchs für Computerphilogie 5 (2003), 126–46; also at http://computerphilologie. uni-muenchen.de/jg03/robinson.html (accessed 26 June 2004).

Roethke, Theodore. Collected Poems of Theodore Roethke. New York: Doubleday [1966].Google Scholar

Rossetti. See McGann, Rossetti Archive.

Sacks, Oliver. The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat. London: Picador, 1985.Google Scholar

Scheibe, Siegfried. “Theoretical Problems of Authorization and Constitutions of Texts” 1990–1; translated in Gabler, Hans Walter, Bornstein, George, and Peirce, Gillian Borland, eds. Contemporary German Editorial Theory. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1995, pp. 171–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schulze, Robin, ed. Becoming Marianne Moore: The Early Poems, 1907–1924. Berkeley: UCLA Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Searle, John R.Expression and Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Seuss, Dr. See Geisel, Theodore Seuss.

Shillingsburg, Miriam. “Computer Assistance to Scholarly Editing.” Bulletin of Research in the Humanities 81 (Winter 1978), 448–63.Google Scholar

Shillingsburg, Peter. Pegasus in Harness: Victorian Publishing and W. M. Thackeray. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1992.Google Scholar

Shillingsburg, PeterResisting Texts: Authority and Submission in Constructions of Meaning. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Shillingsburg, PeterScholarly Editing in the Computer Age, 3rd edn. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shillingsburg, Peter “A Resistance to German Editorial Theory.” editio 12 (1998), 138–50.Google Scholar

Shillingsburg, Peter “Anglo-amerikanische Editionwissenschaft: Ein knapper Überblick,” in Nutt-Kofoth, Rüdiger, Plachta, Bodo, Vliet, H. T. M., and Zwerchina, Hermann, eds. Text und Edition: Positionen und Perspektiven. Berlin: Erich Schmidt, 2000.Google Scholar

Shillingburg, Peter “Authority and Authorization in American Editing,” Autor–Authorisation–Authentizität, ed. Bein, Thomas, Nuttkofoth, Rüdiger and Plachta, Bodo. Special issue of editio. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag 2004, pp. 73–81.

Shillingsburg, Peter “The Computer as Research Assistant in Scholarly Editing.” Literary Research Newsletter 5 (1980), 31–45.Google Scholar

Shillingsburg, Peter “Editing Thackeray: A History.” Studies in the Novel 27 (Fall 1995), 363–74; reprinted in Textual Criticism and the Common Reader, ed. Alexander Pettit. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1999.

Shillingsburg, Peter “The Faces of Victorian Fiction,” in The Iconic Page, ed. Bornstein, George and Tinkle, Theresa (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1998), 141–56.Google Scholar

Shillingsburg, Peter “Orientations to Texts.” editio 15 (2001), 1–16.Google Scholar

Shillingsburg, Peter “Principles for Electronic Archives, Scholarly Editions, and Tutorials,” in The Literary Text in the Digital Age, ed., Finneran, Richard J.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1996, pp. 23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shillingsburg, Peter “Thackeray Bibliography.” Cambridge Bibliography of English Literature, 3rd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. “Conventions and the Understanding of Speech Acts.” Philosophical Quarterly 20 (1970), 118–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Barry. “Towards a History of Speech Act Theory,” in Burkhardt, A., ed., Speech Acts, Meanings and Intentions: Critical Approaches to the Philosophy of John R. Searle. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter, 1990, pp. 29–61. Posted at URL http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith//articles/speechact.html (accessed 8 November 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Martha Nell. Emily Dickinson, http://www.iath.virginia.edu/dickinson/about_the_site.html.

Sperberg-McQueen, Michael. “New TA Software: Some Characteristics, and a Proposed Architecture.” http://pigeon.cch.kcl.ac.uk/ta-dev/notes/design.htm (accessed 26 June 2004).

Sperberg-McQueen, Michael “Textual Criticism and tei.” http://xml.coverpages.org/sperb-mla94.html.

Sperberg-McQueen, Michael ‘Trip Report’ on the ‘Text Analysis Software Planning Meeting’ held at Princeton, 17–19 May 1996, at http://tigger.uic.edu/∼cmsmcq/trips/ceth9505.html (accessed 19 December 2003).

Stillinger, Jack. Multiple Authorship and the Myth of Solitary Genius. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Stoker, Bram. Dracula. London: Constable, 1897.Google Scholar

Stubbs, Estelle and Peter Robinson. The Hengwrt Chaucer Digital Facsimile CD Leicester: Scholarly Digital Editions (www.sd-editions.com), 2000.

Sutherland, John. The Stanford Companion to Victorian Fiction. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Sutherland, John. “Victorian Novelists: Who Were They?” Victorian Writers, Publishers, Readers. New York: St. Martin's, 1995.Google Scholar

Sweeney, Patricia Runk. “Thackeray's Best Illustrator.” Costerus n.s.2 (1974), 84–111.Google Scholar

Tanselle, G. Thomas. Literature and Artifacts. Charlottesville: Bibliographical Society of the University of Virginia, 1998.Google Scholar

Tanselle, G. Thomas. The Rationale of Textual Criticism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Thackeray, W. M. Letters (see Ray, Gordon).

Thackeray, W. MPendennis. Leipzig: Tauchnitz, 1849–50.Google Scholar

Thackeray, W. MVanity Fair. London: Bradbury and Evans, 1847. (Peter Shillingsburg's edition. New York: Garland, 1989.)Google Scholar

Thackeray, W. M [Scholarly Editions of] Henry Esmond, ed. Edgar Harden (1989), Pendennis, ed. Peter Shillingsburg (1991), Yellowplush and Gahagan, ed. Peter Shillingsburg (1991), Newcomes, ed. Peter Shillingsburg (1996), Barry Lyndon, ed. Edgar Harden (1998), Catherine, ed. Sheldon Goldfarb (1998) – the first four published by Garland; the latter three by University of Michigan Press.

Thorpe, James. Principles of Textual Criticism. San Marino: Huntington Library, 1972.Google Scholar

Thorpe, James. “The Aesthetics of Textual Criticism.” PMLA 80 (1965),: 465–82. Reprinted in Thorpe, Principles of Textual Criticism, pp. 3–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thorpe, James “The Treatment of Accidentals,” in James Thorpe, Principles of Textual Criticism, San Marino: Huntingdon Library, 1972, pp. 141–51.Google Scholar

Timperley, C. H.The Printers' Manual. London: H. Johnson, 1838.Google Scholar

Todd, William, and Bowden, Ann. The Tauchnitz International Editions in English 1841–1955: A Bibliographical History. New York: Bibliographical Society of America, 1988.Google Scholar

Tuchman, Gaye, and Fortin, Nina. Edging Women Out: Victorian Novelists, Publishers, and Social Change. London: Routledge, 1989.Google Scholar

Unsworth, John. “Reconsidering and Revising the MLA Committee on Scholarly Editions' Guidelines for Scholarly Editions.” http://www.iath.virginia.edu/∼jmu2m/sts2001.html (accessed 7 September 2004).

Vanhoutte, Edward. “A Linkemic Approach to Textual Variation: Theory and Practice of the Electronic-Critical Editions of Stijn Streuvels' De teleurgang van den Waterhoek.” Human IT 1 (2000), www.hb.se/bhs/ith/1-00/ev.htm (accessed 3 December 2004).Google Scholar

Victorian Web. www.victorianweb.org (accessed 3 December 2004).

Viscomi, Joseph, et al. Blake Archive. www.blakearchive.org/main.html.

Warren, Michael, and Taylor, Gary. The Divisions of the Kingdom. London: Oxford University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Wimsatt, W. K., and Beardsley, Monroe. “The Intentional Fallacy.” Sewanee Review (1946), 468–88. Reprinted in Wimsatt, W. K., The Verbal Icon. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press, 1954.Google Scholar

Zeller, Hans. “A New Approach to the Critical Constitution of Literary Texts.” Studies in Bibliography 28 (1975), 231–64.Google Scholar

Zeller, Hans “Structure and Genesis in Editing: On German and Anglo-American Textual Criticism,” in Contemporary German Editorial Theory, ed. Gabler, Hans Walter, Bornstein, George, and Pierce, Gillian Borland. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1995, pp. 95–123.