Aitchison, Jean 1995. Tadpoles, Cuckoos, and Multiple Births: Language Contact and Models of Change. In J. Fisiak (ed.), Linguistic Change under Contact Conditions, 1–13. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter

Aitchison, Jean 2001. Language Change: Progress or Decay? 3rd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

August, Eugene R. 1992. Real Men Don't: Anti-Male Bias in English. In G. Goshgarian (ed.), Exploring Language, 6th edn, 238–48. New York: HarperCollins

Bäck, Hilding 1934. The Synonyms for ‘Child’, ‘Boy’, ‘Girl’ in Old English: An Etymological-Semasiological Investigation. In E. Ekwall (ed.), Lund Studies in English II. Lund: A.-B. Ph. Lindstedts Univ.-Bokhandel

Bäcklund, Ingegerd 1996. Males and Females in Jane Austen's World: A Study of Terms. In G. Persson and M. Rydén (eds.), Male and Female Terms in English: Proceedings of the Symposium at Umeå University, May 18–19, 1994, 9–28. Umeå: Umeå University; Uppsala: Distributed by Swedish Science Press

Bailey, Charles J. and Karl Maroldt 1977. The French Lineage in English. In J. M. Meisel (ed.), Langues en Contact – Pidgins – Creoles – Languages in Contact, 21–53. Tübingen: TBL Verlag Gunter Narr

Bailey, Richard 1991. Images of English: A Cultural History of the Language. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press

Bailey, Richard 1996. Nineteenth-Century English. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press

Bain, Alexander 1879. A Higher English Grammar. New edn. London: Longmans

Barber, Charles 1993. The English Language: A Historical Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Barlow, Michael 1992. A Situated Theory of Agreement. New York: Garland

Baron, Dennis 1986. Grammar and Gender. New Haven: Yale University Press

Baron, Naomi S. 1971. A Reanalysis of English Grammatical Gender. Lingua 27: 113–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Batliner, Anton 1984. The Comprehension of Grammatical and Natural Gender: a Cross-Linguistic Experiment. Linguistics 22: 831–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baugh, Albert C. and Thomas Cable 1978. A History of the English Language. 3rd edn. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul

Beardsmore, H. Baetens 1971. A Gender Problem in a Language Contact Situation. Lingua 27: 141–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beattie, James 1968 [1788]. Theory of Language. Reprint. Menston: Scolar Press

Bebout, Linda 1984. Asymmetries in Male-Female Word Pairs. American Speech 59.1: 13–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bebout, Linda 1995. Asymmetries in Male/Female Word Pairs: A Decade of Change. American Speech 70.2: 163–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bennett-Kastor, Tina L. 1996. Anaphora, Nonanaphora, and the Generic Use of Pronouns by Children. American Speech 71: 285–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benson, Larry D. (ed.) 1987. The Riverside Chaucer. 3rd edn. Boston: Houghton Mifflin

Bergvall, Victoria L., Janet M. Bing, and Alice F. Freed (eds.) 1996. Rethinking Language and Gender Research: Theory and Practice. London; New York: Longman

Bing, Janet B. and Victoria L. Bergvall 1998. The Question of Questions: Beyond Binary Thinking. In J. Coates (ed.), Language and Gender: A Reader, 495–510. Oxford; Malden, MA: Blackwell

Björkman, Erik 1969 [1900]. Scandinavian Loanwords in Middle English. New York: Greenwood Press

Bloomfield, Morton W. and Leonard Newmark 1963. A Linguistic Introduction to the History of English. New York: Alfred A. Knopf

Bodine, Ann 1975. Androcentrism in Prescriptive Grammar: Singular ‘they,’ Sex-indefinite ‘he,’ and ‘he or she.’ Language in Society 4: 129–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bourcier, Georges 1981. An Introduction to the History of the English Language. (English adaptation by Cecily Clark.) Cheltenham: Stanley Thornes

Bradley, Henry 1924 [1904]. The Making of English. London: Macmillan

Bresnan, Joan, and Sam Mchombo 1986. Grammatical and Anaphoric Agreement. In A. M. Farley, P. T. Farley, and K. McCullough (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Theory at the Twenty-Second Regional Meeting (Chicago Linguistics Society, 22), 278–97

Britton, Derek 1991. On Middle English She, Sho: A Scots Solution to an English Problem. North-Western European Language Evolution 17: 3–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, Goold 1982 [1828]. The Institutes of English Grammar. New York: Scholars’ Facsimiles & Reprints

Bryson, Bill 1990. Our Mother Tongue: English and How It Got to Be That Way. London: Penguin

Buccini, Anthony F. Southern Middle English Hise and the Question of Pronominal Transfer in Language Contact. Unpublished paper

Bullions, Peter 1983 [1846]. The Principles of English Grammar. New York: Scholars’ Facsimiles & Reprints

Burgschmidt, Ernst 1988. Gender in Modern English – Sub-systems and Variation. Historical English: on the Occasion of Karl Brunner's 100th Birthday, 219–30. Innsbruck: Institut für Anglistik, Universität Innsbruck

Butler, Judith 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge

Cameron, Deborah 1990. Feminism and Linguistic Theory. 2nd edn. London: Macmillan

Cameron, Deborah 1995. Verbal Hygiene. London: Routledge

Cameron, Deborah and Coates, Jennifer 1985. Some Problems in the Sociolinguistic Explanation of Sex Differences. Language & Communication 5: 143–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, Alistair 1959. Old English Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon

Cassidy, Frederic G. (chief ed.) 1985–. Dictionary of American Regional English. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press

Cawdrey, Robert 1966 [1604]. A Table Alphabeticall of Hard Usual English Words. New York: Scholars’ Facsimiles & Reprints. http://www.library.utoronto.ca/utel/ret/cawdrey/cawdrey0.html

Champneys, A. C. 1893. History of English. London: Percival

Christy, Craig 1983. Uniformitarianism in Linguistics. (Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science, Series III;, Studies in the History of Linguistics, 31.) Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins

Claiborne, Robert 1983. Our Marvelous Native Tongue: The Life and Times of the English Language. New York: Times Books

Clancy, Steven J. 1999. The Ascent of guy. American Speech 74.3: 282–97Google Scholar

Clark, C. 1957. Gender in the ‘Peterborough Chronicle.’ English Studies 38: 109–15Google Scholar

Clark, C. 1970. The Peterborough Chronicle, 1070–1154. 2nd edn. Oxford: Clarendon

Clark Hall, J. R. 1960. A Concise Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. 4th edn. (With a Supplement by Herbert D. Meritt.) Toronto: University of Toronto Press

Classen, E. 1919. On the Origin of Natural Gender in Middle English. Modern Language Review 14: 97–103Google Scholar

Classen, E. 1919. Outlines of the History of the English Language. London: Macmillan

Coates, Jennifer 1996. Women Talk: Conversation between Women Friends. Oxford: Blackwell

Cobbett, William 1986 [1832]. A Grammar of the English Language. New York: Scholars’ Facsimiles & Reprints

Cockayne, Thomas Oswald 1961 [1864]. Leechdoms, Wortcunning and Starcraft of Early England. London: Holland Press

Comrie, Bernard 1999. Grammatical Gender Systems: A Linguist's Assessment. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 28.5: 457–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corbett, Greville G. 1991. Gender. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press

Cornish, Francis 1986. Anaphoric Relations in English and French: A Discourse Perspective. London; Sydney; Dover: Croom Helm

Crawford, Mary 1995. Talking Difference: On Gender and Language. London: Sage

Crystal, David 1995. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Curme, George O. 1931. Syntax. Boston: D. C. Heath

Curzan, Anne 1998. When It Became All Things: A Study of the Rise of Natural Gender in English Anaphoric Pronouns. Unpublished dissertation

Curzan, Anne 1999. Gender Categories in Early English Grammars: Their Message to the Modern Grammarian. In B. Unterbeck and M. Rissanen (eds.), Gender in Grammar and Cognition, 561–76. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter

Dahl, Östen 1999. Animacy and the Notion of Semantic Gender. In B. Unterbeck and M. Rissanen (eds.), Gender in Grammar and Cognition, 99–115. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter

Dalton-Puffer, Christiane 1995. Middle English is a Creole and Its Opposite: On the Value of Plausible Speculation. In J. Fisiak (ed.), Linguistic Change under Contact Conditions, 35–50. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter

Daly, Mary, conjurer, in cahoots with Jane Caputi 1987. Websters’ First New Intergalactic Wickedary of the English Language. Boston: Beacon Press

Danchev, Andrei 1997. The Middle English Creolization Hypothesis Revisited. In J. Fisiak (ed.), Studies in Middle English Linguistics, 79–108. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter

Daniel, Neil 1992. A Guide to Style and Mechanics. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich

Dekeyser, X. 1980. The Diachrony of Gender Systems in English and Dutch. In J. Fisiak (ed.), Historical Morphology, 97–111. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter

Devis, Ellin 1801. The Accidence or First Rudiments of English Grammar. London

Diensberg, Bernhard 1981. The Etymology of Modern English Boy: A New Hypothesis. Medium Ævum 50.1: 79–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diensberg, Bernhard 1985. The Lexical Fields Boy/Girl-Servant-Child in Middle English. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 86: 328–36Google Scholar

Diller, Hans-Jürgen 1991. Pronoun and Reference in Old English Poetry. In D. Kastovsky (ed.), Historical English Syntax, 125–40. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter

Dobson, E. J. 1940. The Etymology and Meaning of Boy. Medium Ævum 9.3: 121–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Domingue, Nicole Z. 1977. Middle English: Another Creole?Journal of Creole Studies 1: 89–100Google Scholar

Dunayer, Joan 1995. Sexist Words, Speciesist Roots. In C. J. Adams and J. Donovan (eds.), Animals and Women: Feminist Theoretical Explorations, 11–31. Durham; London: Duke University Press

Dykema, Karl W. 1960–61. Where Our Grammar Came From. College English 22: 455–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eckert, Penelope and Sally McConnell-Ginet 1998. Communities of Practice: Where Language, Gender, and Power All Live. In J. Coates (ed.), Language and Gender: A Reader, 484–94. Oxford; Malden, MA: Blackwell

Emerson, O. F. 1895. The History of the English Language. New York: Macmillan

Erades, P. A. 1956. Contributions to Modern English Syntax: A Note on Gender. Moderna Sprak 50: 2–11Google Scholar

Ervin, Susan 1962. The Connotations of Gender. Word 18: 249–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farmer, J. S. and W. E. Henley (eds.) 1970 [1890–1904]. Slang and Its Analogues. Reprint. New York: Arno Press

Fell, Christine, Cecily Clark, and Elizabeth Williams 1984. Women in Anglo-Saxon England and the Impact of 1066. London: British Museum Publications

Fennell, Barbara 2001. A History of English: A Sociolinguistic Approach. Oxford; Malden, MA: Blackwell

Fillmore, Charles J. 1978. On the Organization of Semantic Information in the Lexicon: Chicago Linguistic Society April 14–15, 1978. In D. Farkas, W. M. Jacobsen and K. W. Todrys (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on the Lexicon, 148–73. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society

Fisher, John H. 1977. Chancery and the Emergence of Standard Written English in the Fifteenth Century. Speculum 52: 870–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fisiak, Jacek 1977. Sociolinguistics and Middle English: Some Socially Motivated Changes in the History of English. Kwartalnik Neofilologiczny 24: 247–59Google Scholar

Fodor, István 1959. The Origin of Grammatical Gender I & II. Lingua 8: 1–41, 186–214Google Scholar

Fowler, Henry W. 1926. A Dictionary of Modern English Usage. Oxford: Clarendon Press

Fowler, Henry W. and Francis G. Fowler 1906. The King's English. Oxford: Clarendon Press

Frank, Francine and Frank Anshen 1983. Language and the Sexes. New York: State University of New York Press

Gazdar, G., E. Klein and G. K. Pullum 1983. Order, Concord and Constituency. Dordrecht: Foris

Geeraerts, Dirk 1997. Diachronic Prototype Semantics: A Contribution to Historical Lexicology. Oxford: Clarendon Press; New York: Oxford University Press

Geipel, John 1971. The Viking Legacy: The Scandinavian Influence on the English and Gaelic Languages. Devon: David & Charles

Gibbens, V. E. 1955. Shifts in Gender and Meaning of Nouns Designating the Sexes. American Speech 30: 296–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goatly, Andrew 1997. The Language of Metaphors. London; New York: Routledge

Goldstein, Norm (ed.) 1998. The Associated Press Stylebook and Libel Manual. Updated and Revised. Reading, MA: Perseus Books

Görlach, Manfred 1986. Middle English – A Creole? In D. Kastovsky and A. Szwedek (eds.), Linguistics Across Historical and Geographical Boundaries, Vol. 1, 329–44. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Gouëffic, Louise 1996. Breaking the Patriarchal Code. Manchester, CT: Knowledge, Ideas & Trends

Green, Jonathon 1996. Chasing the Sun: Dictionary Makers and the Dictionaries They Made. New York: Henry Holt

Greenbaum, Sidney 1996. The Oxford English Grammar. London: Oxford University Press

Greene, Samuel S. 1983 [1874]. An Analysis of the English Language. New York: Scholars’ Facsimiles & Reprints

Grimm, Jakob Karl Ludwig 1984. On the Origin of Language. Trans. by Raymond A. Wiley. Leiden: E. J. Brill

Grossman, Ellie 1997. The Grammatically Correct Handbook. New York: Hyperion

Hall, R. A. Jr. 1951. Sex Reference and Grammatical Gender in English. American Speech 26: 170–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halliday, Frank E. 1975. The Excellency of the English Tongue. London: Gollancz

Harris, Alice C. and Lyle Campbell 1995. Historical Syntax in Cross-linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Harris, James 1765 [1751]. Hermes, or a Philosophical Inquiry Concerning Universal Grammar. 2nd edn. London

Harvey, Thomas W. 1987 [1878]. A Practical Grammar of the English Language. New York: Scholars’ Facsimiles & Reprints

Heltveit, Trygve 1958. Attribute and Anaphora in the Gender System of English. Norsk Tidskrift for Sprogvidenskap 18: 357–69Google Scholar

Henley, Nancy 1987. This New Species that Seeks a New Language: On Sexism in Language and Language Change. In J. Penfield (ed.), Women and Language in Transition, 3–27. New York: State University of New York Press

Hines, Caitlin 1994. “Let me call you sweetheart”: The woman as dessert metaphor. In M. Bucholtz, A. C. Liang, L. A. Sutton, and C. Hines (eds.), Cultural Performances: Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Women and Language Conference, 295–303. Berkeley: Women and Language Group

Hines, Caitlin 1999. Foxy Chicks and Playboy Bunnies: A Case Study in Metaphorical Lexicalization. In M. K. Hiraga, C. Sinha, S. Wilcox (eds.), Cultural, Psychological, and Typological Issues in Cognitive Linguistics, 9–23. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Hines, John 1991. Scandinavian English: A Creole in Context. In P. S. Ureland and G. Broderick (eds.), Language Contact in the British Isles: Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Language Contact, 403–27. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag

Hooks, Julius N. and Ernst G. Mathews 1956. Modern American Grammar and Usage. New York: Roland Press

Horn, Lawrence R. and Steven R. Kleinedler 2000. Parasitic Reference versus R-based Narrowing: Lexical Pragmatics Meets He-Man. Linguistic Society of America Convention, Chicago, 6 January. Unpublished paper

Howe, Stephen 1996. The Personal Pronouns in the Germanic Languages. (Studia Linguistica Germanica, 43.) Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter

Huddleston, Rodney D. 1984. Introduction to the Grammar of English. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press

Hughes, Geoffrey 1988. Words in Time: A Social History of the English Vocabulary. Oxford; New York: Blackwell

Hughes, Geoffrey 1991. Swearing: A Social History of Foul Language, Oaths, and Profanity in English. Oxford: Basil Blackwell

Ibrahim, M. H. 1973. Grammatical Gender, Its Origin and Development. Paris: La-Hay

Jakobson, Roman 1966. On Linguistic Aspects of Translation. In R. A. Brower (ed.), On Translation, 232–39. New York: Oxford University Press

James, Deborah 1998. Gender-Linked Derogatory Terms and Their Use by Women and Men. American Speech 73.4: 399–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jespersen, Otto 1912. Growth and Structure of the English Language. 2nd edn. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner

Jespersen, Otto 1924. The Philosophy of Grammar. London: G. Allen & Unwin; New York: H. Holt and Co

Jespersen, Otto 1933. Essentials of English Grammar. New York: Henry Holt

Johnson, Samuel 1882. A Dictionary of the English Language. Ed. Rev. H. J. Todd. Revised by Robert G. Latham. London

Joly, André 1975. Toward a Theory of Gender in Modern English. In A. Joly and T. Fraser (eds.), Studies in English Grammar, 229–87. Paris: Editions Universitaires

Jones, Charles 1967a. The Functional Motivation of Linguistic Change: a Study in the Development of the Grammatical Category of Gender in the late Old English Period. English Studies 4: 97–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, Charles 1967b. The Grammatical Category of Gender in Early Middle English. English Studies 48: 289–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, Charles 1988. Grammatical Gender in English: 950–1250. London; New York; Sydney: Croom Helm

Jones, Richard F. 1953. The Triumph of the English Language. Stanford: Stanford University Press

Jonson, Ben 1972 [1640]. The English Grammar. A Scolar Press Facsimile. Menston: Scolar Press

Kanekiyo, T. 1965. Notes on Gender in English. Philologica Pragensia 8: 234–37Google Scholar

Kastovsky, Dieter 1999. Inflectional Classes, Morphological Restructuring, and the Dissolution of Old English Grammatical Gender. In B. Unterbeck and M. Rissanen (eds.), Gender in Grammar and Cognition, 709–28. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter

Keller, Rudi 1994. On Language Change: The Invisible Hand in Language. Trans. by Brigitte Nerlich. London; New York: Routledge

Kerl, Simon 1985 [1878]. A Common-School Grammar of the English Language. New York: Scholars Facsimiles & Reprints

Kirkham, Samuel 1833. English Grammar in Familiar Lectures. New York: McElrath, Bangs, & Herbert

Kitson, Peter 1990. On Old English Nouns of More Than One Gender. English Studies 71: 185–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kittredge, George L. and Frank E. Farley 1913. An Advanced English Grammar. Boston: Ginn and Co.

Klaeber, Friedrich (ed.) 1950. Beowulf and the Fight at Finnsburg. 3rd edn. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath

Kleparski, Grzegorz A. 1996. Semantic Change in an Onomasiological Perspective. In G. Persson and M. Rydén (eds.), Male and Female Terms in English: Proceedings of the Symposium at Umeå University, May 18–19, 1994, 41–91. Umeå: Umeå University; Uppsala: Distributed by Swedish Science Press

Kleparski, Grzegorz A. 1997. Theory and Practice of Historical Semantics: The Case of Middle English and Early Modern English Synonyms of girl/young woman. Lublin: University Press of the Catholic University of Lublin

Kolln, Martha 1999. Rhetorical Grammar: Grammatical Choices, Rhetorical Effects. 3rd edn. Boston: Allyn and Bacon

Kytö, Merja (compiler) 1991. Manual to the Diachronic Part of the Helsinki Corpus of English Texts: Coding Conventions and Lists of Source Texts. Helsinki: Department of English, University of Helsinki

Labov, William 1978. On the Use of the Present to Explain the Past. In P. Baldi and R. Werth (eds.), Readings in Historical Phonology, 275–312. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press

Labov, William 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change: Internal Factors. Oxford; Malden, MA: Blackwell

Labov, William 2001. Principles of Linguistic Change: External Factors. Oxford; Malden, MA: Blackwell

Lakoff, George 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press

Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books

Lakoff, Robin 1975. Language and Woman's Place. New York: Octagon Books

Langenfelt, Gösta 1951. She and Her Instead of It and Its. Anglia 70: 90–101Google Scholar

Laqueur, Thomas 1990. Making Sex: Body and Gender from the Greeks to Freud. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Lass, Roger 1987. The Shape of English: Structure and History. London: Dent

Lass, Roger 1992. Phonology and Morphology. In N. Blake (ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. 2 (1066–1476), 23–155. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Lehmann, Winfred P. 1958. On Earlier Stages of Indo-European Influence. Language 34: 179–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Le Page, Robert 1987. The Need for a Multidimensional Model. In G. Gilbert (ed.), Pidgin and Creole Languages, 113–29. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press

Lévi-Strauss, Claude 1967. Le Sexe des Astres. To Honor Roman Jakobson: Essays on the Occasion of His Seventieth Birthday, Vol. 2, 1163–70. The Hague: Mouton

Liberman, Anatoly 1998. English Girl under the Asterisked Sky of the Indo-Europeans. In A. della Volpe and E. C. Polomé (eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh Annual UCLA Indo-European Conference, Los Angeles, 1995, 150–172. Journal of Indo-European Studies Monograph Number Twenty-Seven. Washington, DC: Institute for the Study of Man

Liberman, Anatoly 2000. The Etymology of English Boy, Beacon, and Buoy. American Journal of Germanic Linguistics and Literatures 12.2: 201–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lighter, J. E. (ed.) 1994–. Random House Historical Dictionary of American Slang. New York: Random House

Lightfoot, David W. 1979. Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Lippi-Green, Rosina 1997. English with an Accent: Language, Ideology, and Discrimination in the United States. London; New York: Routledge

Lipton, Jack P. and Hershaft, Alan M. 1984. “Girl,” “Woman,” “Guy,” “Man”: The Effects of Sexist Labeling. Sex Roles 10: 183–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liske, Holly Bea 1994. The Status of the Sexes: A View Through Language. In K. Hall, M. Bucholtz, B. Moonwomon (eds.), Locating Power: Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Women and Language Conference, Vol. 2, 356–361. Berkeley: Berkeley Women and Language Group

Livia, Anna 2001. Pronoun Envy: Literary Uses of Linguistic Gender. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Lounsbury, T. R. 1891. History of the English Language. New York: Henry Holt

Lüdtke, Helmut 1995. On the Origin of Middle and Modern English. In J. Fisiak (ed.), Linguistic Change under Contact Conditions, 51–53. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter

Lunsford, Andrea and Robert Connors 1997. The Everyday Writer. New York: St. Martin's Press

MacKay, Donald 1983. Prescriptive Grammar and the Pronoun Problem. In B. Thorne, C. Kramarae, and N. Henley (eds.), Language, Gender and Society, 38–53. Rowley: Newbury House

Major, Clarence (ed.) 1994. Juba to Jive: A Dictionary of African-American Slang. New York: Penguin Books

Malone, Joseph L. 1985. On the Feminine Pronominalization of Irish and English Boat Nouns. General Linguistics 25: 189–98Google Scholar

Marckwardt, Albert H. and Fred G. Walcott 1938. Facts about Current English Usage. A Publication of the National Council of Teachers of English. New York: D. Appleton-Century Co.

Marcoux, Dell 1973. Deviation in English Gender. American Speech 48: 98–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Markey, Thomas L. 1982. Afrikaans: Creole or Non-Creole?Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 49: 169–207Google Scholar

Markus, Manfred 1988. Reasons for the Loss of Gender in English. In D. Kastovsky and G. Bauer (eds.), Luick Revisited: Papers Read at the Luick-Symposium at Schloß Liechtenstein, 15–18.9.1985, 241–58. Tübingen: Gunter Narr

Markus, Manfred 1995. On the Growing Role of Semantic and Pragmatic Features in Middle English. In J. Fisiak (ed.), Linguistic Change under Contact Conditions, 161–78. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter

Martyna, Wendy 1978. What Does ‘He’ Mean? Use of the Generic Masculine. Journal of Communication 28.1: 131–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martyna, Wendy 1980a. Beyond the ‘He/Man’ Approach: The Case for Nonsexist Language. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 5: 482–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martyna, Wendy 1980b. The Psychology of the Generic Masculine. In S. McConnell-Ginet, R. Borker, and N. Furman (eds.), Women and Language in Literature and Society, 69–78. New York: Praeger

Martyna, Wendy 1983. Beyond the He/Man Approach: The Case for Nonsexist Language. In B. Thorne, C. Kramarae, and N. Henley (eds.), Language, Gender and Society, 25–37. Rowley: Newbury House

Mathiot, Madeleine 1979. Sex Roles as Revealed Through Referential Gender in American English. In M. Mathiot (ed.), Ethnolinguistics: Boas, Sapir and Whorf Revisited, 1–47. The Hague: Mouton

Mausch, Hanna 1986. A Note on LME Gender. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 18: 89–100Google Scholar

Mausch, Hanna 1989. Personal Pronouns and Markedness: An Interpretation of Grammatically Conditioned Changes. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 22: 81–90Google Scholar

McConnell-Ginet, Sally 1979. Prototypes, Pronouns and Persons. In M. Mathiot (ed.), Ethnolinguistics: Boas, Sapir and Whorf Revisited, 63–83. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter

McConnell-Ginet, Sally 1988. Language and Gender. In F. J. Newmeyer (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, 75–99. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988

McConnell-Ginet, Sally 1989. The Sexual (Re)Production of Meaning: A Discourse-Based Theory. In F. W. Frank and P. A. Treichler (eds.), Language, Gender, and Professional Writing; Theoretical Approaches and Guidelines for Nonsexist Usage, 35–50. New York: Modern Language Association

McIntosh, Angus 1956. The Analysis of Written Middle English. Transactions of the Philological Society 54: 26–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McIntosh, Angus 1989. Middle English Word-Geography: Its Potential Role in the Study of the Long-Term Impact of the Scandinavian Settlements upon English. In M. Laing (ed.), Middle English Dialectology, 98–105. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press

McIntosh, Angus, M. L. Samuels, Michael Benskin, et al. 1987. Linguistic Atlas of Late Mediaeval English. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press

McMahon, April 1994. Understanding Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

McWhorter, John 1998. Word on the Street: Debunking the Myth of a “Pure” Standard English. Cambridge, MA: Perseus

Megginson, David 1994. He (pl) and Other New Old English Pronouns. ANQ: A Quarterly Journal of Short Articles, Notes & Reviews 7: 6–13Google Scholar

Middle English Dictionary 1952–. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. http://ets.umdl.umich.edu/m/med/

Miller, Casey and Kate Swift 1977. Words and Women. New York: Anchor Books

Miller, Casey 1980. The Handbook on Nonsexist Writing. New York: Lippincott and Crowell

Miller, Thomas (ed.) 1959 [1890]. The Old English Version of Bede's Ecclesiastical History of the English People. (EETS, 95.) Oxford: Oxford University Press

Mills, Jane 1989. Womanwords. London: Virago Press

Millward, C. M. 1996. Biography of the English Language. 2nd edn. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich

Milroy, James 1992. Linguistic Variation and Change. Oxford: Blackwell

Milroy, James 2000. Historical Description and the Ideology of the Standard Language. In L. Wright (ed.), The Development of Standard English, 1300–1800, 11–28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Milroy, Lesley 1980. Language and Social Networks. Oxford: Blackwell

Mitchell, Bruce 1986. Old English Syntax. Oxford: Clarendon Press

Modern English Collection, Humanities Text Initiative, University of Michigan. http://www.hti.umich.edu/p/pd-modeng/

Moe, Albert F. 1963. “Lady” and “Woman”: The Terms’ Use in the 1880s. American Speech 38: 295Google Scholar

Moore, Samuel 1921. Grammatical and Natural Gender in Middle English. Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 36: 79–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morris, Lori 1993. Gender in Modern English: The System and Its Uses. Unpublished dissertation

Moulton, Janice 1977. The Myth of Neutral ‘Man.’ In M. Vetterling-Braggin, F. Elliston, and J. English (eds.), Feminism and Philosophy, 124–137. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield

Moulton, Janice 1981. The Myth of the Neutral ‘Man.’ In M. Vetterling-Braggin (ed.), Sexist Language: A Modern Philosophical Analysis, 100–115. New Jersey: Littlefield, Adams, & Co

Mugglestone, Lynda (ed.) 2000. Lexicography and the OED: Pioneers in the Untrodden Forest. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Mühlhäusler, Peter 1986. Pidgin and Creole Linguistics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell

Mühlhäusler, Peter and Rom Harré 1990. Pronouns and People: The Linguistic Construction of Social and Personal Identity. Oxford: Blackwell

Murray, K. M. Elizabeth 1977. Caught in the Web of Words: James Murray and the Oxford English Dictionary. New Haven; London: Yale University Press

Murray, Lindley 1981 [1824]. English Grammar. New York: Scholars’ Facsimiles & Reprints

Mustanoja, Tauno F. 1960. A Middle English Syntax Part I. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique

Namai, Kenichi 2000. Gender Features in English. Linguistics 38.4: 771–79Google Scholar

Naro, Anthony J. and Miriam Lemle 1976. Syntactic Diffusion. In S. Steever, C. Walker, S. Mufwene (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Diachronic Syntax, 221–40. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society

Nevalainen, Terttu and Helena Raumolin-Brunberg 1994. Its Strength and the Beauty of It: The Standardization of the Third Person Neuter Possessive in Early Modern English. In D. Stein and I. Tieken-Boon van Ostade (eds.), Towards a Standard English, 1600–1800, 171–216. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter

Newman, Michael 1997. Epicene Pronouns: The Linguistics of a Prescriptive Problem. New York, London: Garland

Ng, Sik Hung, Chan, Kam Kuen, Weatherall, Ann, and Moody, Joanna 1993. Polarized Semantic Change of Words Associated with Females and Males. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 12: 66–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norberg, Catherine 1996. Chaucer's Women: Female Occupational Terms in The Canterbury Tales. In G. Persson and M. Rydén (eds.), Male and Female Terms in English: Proceedings of the Symposium at Umeå University, May 18–19, 1994, 115–34. Umeå: Umeå University; Uppsala: Distributed by Swedish Science Press

Ogilvie, John 1882. The Imperial Dictionary, English, Technological, and Scientific. New edn. Ed. Charles Annandale. London: Blackie & Son

Oxford English Dictionary 1989. 2nd edn. Oxford: Clarendon. Oxford English Dictionary Online: http://dictionary.oed.com

Pauwels, Anne 1998. Women Changing Language. London; New York: Longman

Penelope, Julia and McGowan, Cynthia 1979. Woman and Wife: Social and Semantic Shifts in English. Papers in Linguistics 12: 491–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Persson, Gunnar 1990. Meanings, Models and Metaphors: A Study in Lexical Semantics in English. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International

Persson, Gunnar 1996. Invectives and Gender in English. In G. Persson and M. Rydén (eds.), Male and Female Terms in English: Proceedings of the Symposium at Umeå University, May 18–19, 1994, 157–73. Umeå: Umeå University; Uppsala: Distributed by Swedish Science Press

Persson, Gunnar and Mats Rydén 1995. The Project “Male and Female Terms in English”: A Diachronic Study of a Semantic Field. In H. Kardela and G. Persson (eds.), New Trends in Semantics and Lexicography, 145–50. Umeå: Acta Universitatis Umensis

Peyton, V. J. 1771. The History of the English Language. Reprint. Menston: Scolar Press

Plag, Ingo 1994. Creolization and Language Change: A Comparison. In D. Adone and I. Plag (eds.), Creolization and Language Change, 3–19. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag

Poussa, Patricia 1982. The Evolution of Early Standard English: The Creolization Hypothesis. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 14: 69–85Google Scholar

Robbins, Susan and Stanley, Julia 1978. Going Through the Changes: The Pronoun She in Middle English. Papers in Linguistics 11.1–2: 71–88Google Scholar

Roberts, Jane A. 1970. Traces of Unhistorical Gender Congruence in a Late Old English Manuscript. English Studies 51: 30–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robins, R. H. 1971 [1951]. Ancient and Mediaeval Grammatical Theory in Europe. Reprint. New York: Kennikat

Robinson, Fred 1968. European Clothing Names and the Etymology of Girl. In W. Arndt, P. Brosman, F. Loenen, W. Friederich (eds.), Studies in Historical Linguistics in Honor of George Sherman Lane, 233–40. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press

Rodgers, Bruce 1972. The Queens’ Vernacular: A Gay Lexicon. San Francisco: Straight Arrow Books

Romaine, Suzanne 1982. Sociohistorical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Romaine, Suzanne 1988. Pidgin and Creole Languages. New York: Longman

Romaine, Suzanne 1999. Communicating Gender. New Jersey; London: Lawrence Erlbaum

Ross, A. S. C. 1936. Sex and Gender in the Lindisfarne Gospels. Journal of English and Germanic Philology 35: 321–30Google Scholar

Rot, Sandor 1984. Inherent Variability and Linguistic Interference of Anglo-Old-Scandinavian and Anglo-Norman French Language Contacts in the Formation of Grammatical Innovations in Late Old English and Middle English. In N. F. Blake and C. Jones (eds.), English Historical Linguistics: Studies in Development, 67–86. Sheffield: Centre for English Cultural Tradition and Language, University of Sheffield

Rudskoger, A. 1955. A Note on the Use of she for Inanimate Things in Australian. Moderna Sprak 49: 264–5Google Scholar

Ruud, Martin 1926. She Once More. Review of English Studies 2: 201–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rydén, Mats 1996. Aspects of Language Use. In G. Persson and M. Rydén (eds.), Male and Female Terms in English: Proceedings of the Symposium at Umeå University, May 18–19, 1994, 1–7. Umeå: Umeå University; Uppsala: Distributed by Swedish Science Press

Safire, William 1999. Genderese: Looking for a Masterful Webmistress?New York Times Magazine, 16 MayGoogle Scholar

Sampson, Gloria P. 1979. Sociolinguistic Aspects of Pronoun Usage in Middle English. In W. C. McCormack and S. A. Wurm (eds.), Language and Society: Anthropolgical Issues, 61–69. The Hague: Mouton

Samuels, M. L. 1963. Some Applications of Middle English Dialectology. English Studies 44: 81–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Samuels, M. L. 1969. The Role of Functional Selection in the History of English. In R. Lass (ed.), Approaches to English Historical Linguistics, 325–44. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston

Samuels, M. L. 1972. Linguistic Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Samuels, M. L. 1988. Dialect and Grammar. In J. A. Alford (ed.), A Companion to Piers Plowman, 201–21. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley University Press

Samuels, M. L. 1989. The Great Scandinavian Belt. In M. Laing (ed.), Middle English Dialectology, 106–15. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press

Sandred, Karl Inge 1991. Nominal Inflection in the Old English of the Anglo-Saxon Land Charters: Change of Gender or Analogy?Studia Neophilologica 63: 3–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sandström, Caroline 1999. The Changing System of Grammatical Gender in Swedish Dialects of Nyland, Finland. In B. Unterbeck and M. Rissanen (eds.), Gender in Grammar and Cognition, 793–806. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter

Sankis, Lizabeth M., Corbitt, Elizabeth M., and Widiger, Thomas A. 1999. Gender Bias in the English Language?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77.6: 1289–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schaffner, Paul. A Brief History of ‘Man and Woman.’ Unpublished Paper

Schultz, Muriel R. 1975. The Semantic Derogation of Women. In B. Thorne and N. Henley (eds.), Language and Sex: Difference and Dominance, 64–75. Rowley, MA: Newbury

Seppänen, Aimo 1985. The who/what Contrast in Germanic Languages. Zeitschrift für Phonetik Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 38: 387–97Google Scholar

Sigley, Robert and Holmes, Janet 2002. Looking at girls in Corpora of English. Journal of English Linguistics 30.2: 138–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simon, John 1980. The Corruption of English. In L. Michaels and C. Ricks (eds.), The State of the Language, 35–42. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press

Sklar, Elizabeth S. 1983. Sexist Grammar Revisited. College English 45: 348–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Jeremy 1992. The Use of English: Language Contact, Dialect Variation, and Written Standardisation During the Middle English Period. In T. W. Machan and C. T. Scott (eds.), English in Its Social Contexts, 47–68. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press

Smitherman, Geneva 2000. Black Talk: Words and Phrases from the Hood to the Amen Corner. Revised edn. Boston: Houghton Mifflin

Spender, Dale 1985. Man Made Language. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul

Stanley, Julia (Penelope) 1977a. Gender-Marking in American English: Usage and Reference. In A. P. Nilsen, H. Bosmajian, H. L. Gershuny, and J. Stanley (eds.), Sexism and Language, 43–76. Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English

Stanley, Julia (Penelope) 1977b. Paradigmatic Woman: The Prostitute. In D. L. Shores and C. P. Hines (eds.), Papers in Language Variation: SAMLA-ADS Collection, 303–21. University: University of Alabama Press

Stanley, Julia (Penelope) 1978. Sexist Grammar. College English 39.7: 800–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar

State of Washington Voters Pamphlet: General Election November 2, 1999, Edition 12. Published by the Office of the Secretary of State, King County Records and Elections, and the City of Seattle

Stein, Dieter 1986. Old English Northumbrian Verb Inflection Revisited. In D. Kastovsky and A. Szwedek (eds.), Linguistics Across Historical and Geographical Boundaries, Vol. 1, 637–50. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Stevick, Robert 1963. The Biological Model and Historical Linguistics. Language 39: 159–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strang, Barbara 1970. A History of English. London: Methuen

Sutton, Laurel A. 1995. Bitches and Skankly Hobags: The Place of Women in Contemporary Slang. In K. Hall and M. Bucholtz (eds.), Gender Articulated: Language and the Socially Constructed Self, 279–86. New York; London: Routledge

Svartengren, T. Hilding 1927. The Feminine Gender for Inanimate Things in Anglo-American. American Speech 3: 83–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Svartengren, T. Hilding 1928. The Use of Personal Gender for Inanimate Things. Dialect Notes 6: 7–56Google Scholar

Svartengren, T. Hilding 1954. The Use of Feminine Gender for Inanimate Things in American Colloquial Speech. Moderna Sprak 48: 261–92Google Scholar

Swanton, Michael (ed.) 1996. The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle. London: J. M. Dent

Sweet, Henry 1871. King Alfred's West-Saxon Version of Gregory's Pastoral Care. (EETS 45, 50.) London: Oxford University Press

Sweet, Henry 1931 [1891]. A New English Grammar: Logical and Historical. 2 vols. Reprint. Oxford: Clarendon Press

Talbot, Mary M. 1998. Language and Gender: An Introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press

Thomas of Erfurt 1972. Grammatica Speculativa. With translation and commentary by G. L. Bursill-Hall. London: Longman

Thomason, Sarah G. and Terrence Kaufman 1988. Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. California: University of California Press

Toon, Thomas 1985. The Politics of Early Old English Sound Change. New York: Academic Press

Toon, Thomas 1992. The Social and Political Contexts of Language Change in Anglo-Saxon England. In T. W. Machan and C. T. Scott (eds.), English in Its Social Contexts, 28–47. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press

Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1972. A History of English Syntax: A Transformational Approach to the History of English Sentence Structure. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston

Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1973. Some Thoughts on Natural Syntactic Processes. In C. J. N. Bailey and R. W. Shuy (eds.), New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English, 313–22. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press

Treichler, Paula A. 1989. From Discourse to Dictionary: How Sexist Meanings Are Authorized. In F. W. Frank and P. A. Treichler (eds.), Language, Gender, and Professional Writing; Theoretical Approaches and Guidelines for Nonsexist Usage, 51–79. New York: Modern Language Association

Trench, Richard Chevenix 1870 [1855]. English, Past and Present. 7th edn. London: Macmillian

Trudgill, Peter 1983. On Dialect: Social and Geographical Perspectives. New York: New York University Press

Trudgill, Peter 1992. Dialect Typology and Social Structure. In E. H. Jahr (ed.), Language Contact: Theoretical and Empirical Studies, 195–212. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Twain, Mark 1921. The Awful German Language. In A Tramp Abroad, Vol. 2, 267–84. New York; London: Harper & Bros

Vachek, J. 1976. Notes on Gender in Modern English. Selected Writings in English and General Linguistics, 386–92. The Hague: Mouton

van Marle, Jaap and Caroline Smits 1995. On the Impact of Language Contact on Inflectional Systems: The Reduction of Verb Inflection in American Dutch and American Frisian. In J. Fisiak (ed.), Linguistic Change under Contact Conditions, 179–206. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter

Verstegan, Richard 1605. A Restitution of decayed intelligence: in antiquities. Concerning the most nobel and renowned English nation. Antwerp

Visser, F. 1963. An Historical Syntax of the English Language. Leiden: E. J. Brill

Fleischhacker, R. 1888. On the Old English Nouns of More than One Gender. Transactions of the Philological Society 21: 235–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vorlat, Emma 1975. The Development of English Grammatical Theory, 1586–1737. Leuven: Leuven University Press

Wales, Katie 1996. Personal Pronouns in Present-Day English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Wallin-Ashcroft, Anna-Lena 1996. Male and Female Terms in 18th Century English Novels. In G. Persson and M. Rydén (eds.), Male and Female Terms in English: Proceedings of the Symposium at Umeå University, May 18–19, 1994, 175–95. Umeå: Umeå University; Uppsala: Distributed by Swedish Science Press

Weber, Doris 1999. On the Function of Gender. In B. Unterbeck and M. Rissanen (eds.), Gender in Grammar and Cognition, 495–510. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter

Webster, Noah 1864. An American Dictionary of the English Language. Edited by Chauncey A. Gooderich and Noah Porter. Springfield, MA: G. & C. Merriam

Welna, Jerzy 1980. On Gender Change in Linguistic Borrowing. In J. Fisiak (ed.), Historical Morphology, 399–420. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter

Werner, Otmar 1991. The Incorporation of Old Norse Pronouns into Middle English. In P. S. Ureland and G. Broderick (eds.), Language Contact in the British Isles: Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Language Contact, 369–401. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag

Wescott, Roger W. 1978 [1974]. Women, Wife-men, and Sexist bias. In Verbatim: Volumes I and II, 15–16. Essex, CT: Verbatim

Whaley, C. Robert and Antonelli, George 1983. The Birds and the Beasts: Woman as Animal. Maledicta 7: 219–29Google Scholar

Whitney, William Dwight (ed.) 1889–1891. The Century Dictionary. New York: The Century Co

Whorf, Benjamin 1956. Grammatical Categories. In J. B. Carroll (ed.), Language, Thought, and Reality, 87–101. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Winchester, Simon 1998. The Professor and the Madman. New York: HarperCollins

Wolfe, Susan 1980a. Constructing and Reconstructing Patriarchy: Sexism and Diachronic Semantics. Papers in Linguistics 13.1–2: 321–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wolfe, Susan 1980b. Gender and Agency in Indo-European Languages. Papers in Linguistics 13.1–2: 773–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wolfe, Susan 1989. The Reconstruction of Word Meanings: A Review of the Scholarship. In F. W. Frank and P. A. Treichler (eds.), Language, Gender, and Professional Writing; Theoretical Approaches and Guidelines for Nonsexist Usage, 80–94. New York: Modern Language Association