References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 October 2018
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- A Gentle Course in Local Class Field TheoryLocal Number Fields, Brauer Groups, Galois Cohomology, pp. 290 - 291Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Alperin, J. L.. Local representation theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1986.Google Scholar
Arason, J. K.. Cohomologische invarianten quadratischer Formen. J. Algebra, 36(3):448–491, 1975.Google Scholar
Blanchard, A.. Les corps non commutatifs. Presses Universitaires de France, Vendôme, 1972.Google Scholar
Cassels, J. W. S. and Fröhlich, A., editors. Algebraic number theory. London Mathematical Society, London, 2010. Papers from the conference held at the University of Sussex, Brighton, September 1–17, 1965, including a list of errata.Google Scholar
Connell, I. G.. Elementary generalizations of Hilbert’s Theorem 90. Canad. Math. Bull., 8:749–757, 1965.Google Scholar
Curtis, C. W. and Reiner, I.. Representation theory of finite groups and associative algebras. AMS Chelsea Publishing, Providence, RI, 2006. Reprint of the 1962 original.Google Scholar
Dixon, J. D., du Sautoy, M. P. F., Mann, A., and Segal, D.. Analytic pro-p groups. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, second edition, 1999.Google Scholar
Gow, R.. Construction of some wreath products as Galois groups of normal real extensions of the rationals. J. Number Theory, 24(3):360–372, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gille, P. and Szamuely, T.. Central simple algebras and Galois cohomology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006.Google Scholar
Koblitz, N.. p-adic numbers, p-adic analysis, and zeta-functions. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1977.Google Scholar
Lenstra, H. W. and Stevenhagen, P.. Chebotarëv and his density theorem. Math. Intelligencer, 18(2):26–37, 1996.Google Scholar
Neukirch, J., Schmidt, A., and Wingberg, K.. Cohomology of number fields. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2008.Google Scholar
Rousseau, G.. On the quadratic reciprocity law. J. Austral. Math. Soc. Ser. A, 51(3):423–425, 1991.Google Scholar
Serre, J.-P.. A course in arithmetic. Springer-Verlag, New York-Heidelberg, 1973. Translated from the French.Google Scholar
Stein, W.. Algebraic number theory, a computational approach. Available online. https://wstein.org/books/ant/ant.pdf.Google Scholar
Stevenhagen, P.. Number rings. Available online. http://websites.math.leidenuniv.nl/algebra/ant.pdf.Google Scholar
Voevodsky, V.. On motivic cohomology with Z/l-coefficients. Ann. Math., 174(1):401–438, 2011.Google Scholar
Waterhouse, W. C.. The normal closures of certain Kummer extensions. Canad. Math. Bull., 37(1):133–139, 1994.Google Scholar
Weibel, C. A.. An introduction to homological algebra. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weibel, C.. 2007 Trieste lectures on the proof of the Bloch–Kato conjecture. In Some recent developments in algebraic K-theory, pp. 277–305. Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste, 2008.Google Scholar