Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of illustrations
- List of maps
- Acknowledgments
- List of abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 The empire of liberty: American ideology and foreign interventions
- 2 The empire of justice: Soviet ideology and foreign interventions
- 3 The revolutionaries: anticolonial politics and transformations
- 4 Creating the Third World: the United States confronts revolution
- 5 The Cuban and Vietnamese challenges
- 6 The crisis of decolonization: Southern Africa
- 7 The prospects of socialism: Ethiopia and the Horn
- 8 The Islamist defiance: Iran and Afghanistan
- 9 The 1980s: the Reagan offensive
- 10 The Gorbachev withdrawal and the end of the Cold War
- Conclusion: Revolutions, interventions, and great power collapse
- Notes
- Index
2 - The empire of justice: Soviet ideology and foreign interventions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 December 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of illustrations
- List of maps
- Acknowledgments
- List of abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 The empire of liberty: American ideology and foreign interventions
- 2 The empire of justice: Soviet ideology and foreign interventions
- 3 The revolutionaries: anticolonial politics and transformations
- 4 Creating the Third World: the United States confronts revolution
- 5 The Cuban and Vietnamese challenges
- 6 The crisis of decolonization: Southern Africa
- 7 The prospects of socialism: Ethiopia and the Horn
- 8 The Islamist defiance: Iran and Afghanistan
- 9 The 1980s: the Reagan offensive
- 10 The Gorbachev withdrawal and the end of the Cold War
- Conclusion: Revolutions, interventions, and great power collapse
- Notes
- Index
Summary
Like the United States, the Soviet state was founded on ideas and plans for the betterment of humanity, rather than on concepts of identity and nation. Both were envisaged by their founders to be grand experiments, on the success of which the future of humankind depended. As states, both were universalist in their approaches to the world and the majority of their leaders believed that friends or enemies on the international stage were defined by proximity or nonproximity to the specific ideological premises on which each of these Powers had been founded. During the Cold War both Soviet and American leaders came to define the potential for such proximity by any country's distance from the other superpower in its foreign policy and domestic political agenda.
In historical terms, much of the twentieth century can be seen as a continuous attempt by other states to socialize Russia and America into forms of international interaction based on principles of sovereignty. In these efforts there were some successes, but many failures. The successes have mainly been connected to crises within the international system that could directly threaten Moscow or Washington themselves. For the United States, as we have seen, the Great Depression, the Second World War, and the end of the Vietnam War all led to a greater degree of accommodation to the interests of other states. For Russia, the period between the 1905 and 1917 revolutions, the aftermath of the German attack in 1941, and the Gorbachev–Yeltsin era signaled such accommodation.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Global Cold WarThird World Interventions and the Making of Our Times, pp. 39 - 72Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2005
- 1
- Cited by